Equitable PCI Bank v. Ong
Equitable PCI Bank v. Ong
Equitable PCI Bank v. Ong
Ong
G.R. No. 156207, September 15, 2006
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.:
Facts:
Warliza Sarande deposited in her account at Philippine Commercial
International Bank a check in the amount of P225,000.00. Sarande was then
informed that said check has been cleared. Relying on such assurance, she
issued two (2) checks where one was issued to respondent Rowena Ong
Owing to a business transaction. The latter then requested PCI Bank to
convert the proceeds thereof into a manager's check, which the PCI Bank
obliged. When Ong deposited the manager's check in her account with
Equitable Banking Corporation, she received a check return-slip informing her
that PCI Bank had stopped the payment of the said check on the ground of
irregular issuance. Ong then filed a complaint for sum of money against herein
petitioner. Petitioner countered that the check was returned as the account
against which it was drawn was already closed.
Issue:
Is petitioner Bank liable to pay the questioned check?
Held:
Yes.
Since the Bank had certified that check, such certification is equivalent
to acceptance and petitioner bank as drawee bank is bound on the instrument
upon certification and it is immaterial to such liability in favor of the plaintiff
who is a holder in due course whether the drawer had funds or not with the
defendant-bank or the drawer was indebted to the bank for more than the
amount of the check.
The certifying bank has all the liabilities under Sec. 62 of the Negotiable
Instruments Law which refers to liability of acceptor. It may be true that said
check was actually not funded but since plaintiff became a holder in due
course, defendant-bank cannot interpose a defense of want or lack of
consideration because that defense is equitable or personal and cannot
prosper against a holder in due course pursuant to Section 28 of the
Negotiable Instruments Law.
Moreover, what Ong obtained from PCI Bank was not just any ordinary
check but a manager's check.