Week 1-3 (Reading Academic Texts)
Week 1-3 (Reading Academic Texts)
Week 1-3 (Reading Academic Texts)
CARMELA G. REYES
T-II SCIENCE CITY OF MUNOZ DIVISION
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Activity
B. Analysis
C. Abstraction
The teacher will ask the students to read the text entitled From Hand to
Mouth by Michael C. Corballis (English for Academic and Professional
Purposes (DepEd Copy)),.
The students will do the Pop-Corn Reading. (One students will be called
to start reading the text, when the teacher said stop the student will stop
reading and another student will be called to continue the reading exactly
where his/her classmate stopped)
D. Application
The teacher will let the students identify the parts of an academic text
in the ‘From Hand to Mouth by Michael C. Corbalis’
IV. Evaluation
V. Assignment
Find one academic text (students may copy it, photocopy or cut).
Paste it on your notebook and identify the parts of the text.
VI. Reflection
2. What new or additional learning have you had after taking up this
lesson in terms of skills, content and attitude?
From Hand to Mouth
By Michael C. Corballis
(1) Imagine trying to teach a child to talk without using your hands or any
other means of pointing of gesturing. The task would surely be impossible.
There can be little doubt that bodily gestures are involved in the
development of language, both in the individual and in the species. Yet,
once the system is up and running, it can function entirely on vocalizations, as
when two friends chat over the phone and create in each other’s minds a
world of events far removed from the actual sounds that emerge from their
lips. My contention is that the vocal element emerged relatively late in
hominid evolution. If the modern chimpanzee is to be our guide, the
common ancestor of 5 or 6 million years ago would have been utterly
incapable of a telephone conversation but would have been able to make
voluntary movements of hands and face that could the least serve as a
platform upon which to build a language.
(2) Evidence suggests that the vocal machinery necessary for autonomous
speech developed quite recently in hominid evolution. Grammatical
language may well have begun to emerge around 2 million years ago but
would at first have been primary gestural, though no doubt punctuated with
grunts and other vocal cries that were at first largely involuntary and
emotional. The complex adjustments necessary to produce speech as we
know it today would have taken some time to evolve, and may not have
been complete until some 170,000 years ago, or even later, when Homo
sapiens emerged to grace, but more often disgrace, the planet. These
adjustments may have been incomplete even in our close relatives the
Neanderthals; arguably, it was this failure that contributed to their demise.
(3) The question now is what were the selective pressures that led to the
eventual dominance of speech? On the face of it, an acoustic medium
seems a poor way to convey information about the world; not for nothing is it
said that a picture is worth a thousand words. Moreover, signed language
has all the lexical and grammatical complexity of spoken language. Primate
evolution is itself a testimony to the primacy of the visual world. We share with
monkeys a highly sophisticated visual system, giving us three- dimension
information in colour about us, and an intricate system for exploring that
world through movement and manipulation. Further, in a hunter- gatherer
environment, where predators and prey are major concern, there are surely.
advantages in silent communication since sound acts as a general alert. And
yet we came to communicate about the world in a medium that in all
primates except ourselves is primitive and stereotyped- and noisy.
(4) Before we consider the pressures that may have favoured vocalization
over gestures, it bears repeating that the switch from hand to mouth was
almost certainly not an abrupt one. In fact, manual gestures still feature
prominently in language; even as fluent speakers gesture almost as much as
they vocalize, and of course deaf communities spontaneously develop
signed language. It has also been proposed that speech itself is in many
respects better conceived as composed of gestures rather than sequences
of these elusive phantoms called phonemes. In this view, language evolved
as a system of gestures based on movements of the hands, arms and face,
including movements of the mouth, lips, and tongue. It would not have been
a big steps to add voicing to the gestural repertoire, at first as mere grunts,
but later articulated so that invisible gestures of the oral cavity could
rendered accessible, but to the ear rather than the eye. There may therefore
have been continuity from the language that was almost exclusively manual
and facial, though perhaps punctuated by involuntary grunts, to one in
which the vocal component has a much more extensive repertoire and is
under voluntary control. The essential feature of modern expressive language
is not that it is purely vocal, but rather that the component can function
autonomously and provide the grammar as well as meaning of linguistics
communication.
(5) What, then, are the advantages of a language that can operate
autonomously through voice and ear, rather than hand and eye? Why
speech? Advantages of Arbitrary Symbols
(7) It may well have been very important for hunter-gatherers to identify and
name a great many similar fruits, plants, trees, animals, birds, and so on, and
attempts at iconic representation would eventually only confuse. Jared
Diamond observes that the people living largely traditional lifestyle in New
Guinea can name hundreds of birds, animals, and plants, along with details
about each of them. These people are illiterate, relying on word of mouth to
pass on information, not only about potential foods, but also about how to
survive dangers, such as crop failures, droughts, cyclones, and raids from
other tribes. Diamond suggests that the main repository of accumulated
information is elderly. He points out that humans are unique among primates
in that they can expect to live to a ripe old age, well beyond the age of child
bearing (although perhaps it was not always so). A slowing down of
senescence may well have been selected in evolution because the
knowledge retained by the elderly enhanced the survival of their younger
relatives. An elderly, knowledgeable granny may help us all live a little longer,
and she can also look after the kids.
In The Dark
Listen to Me!
(14) For humans, visual signals can only attract attention if they occur within a
fairly restricted region of space, whereas the alerting power of sound is more
or less independent of where its source is located relative to listener. And
sound is a better alerting medium in other respects as well. No amount of
gesticulation will wake a sleeping person, whereas a loud yell will usually do
the trick. The alerting power of sound no doubt explains why animals have
evolved vocal signals for sending messages of alarm. Notwithstanding the
peacock’s tail or parrot’s gaudy plumage, even birds prefer to make noises
to attract attention, whether in proclaiming territory or warning of danger.
Visual signals are relatively inefficient because they may elude our gaze, and
in any case we can shut them out by closing our eyes, as we vulnerable to
auditory assault.
Three Hands Better than Two (16) Another reason why vocal language may
have arisen is that it proves an extra medium. We have already seen that
most people gesture with their hands, and indeed their faces, while they talk.
One might argue then, that the addition of vocal channel provides
additional texture and richness to the message.
(17) But perhaps it is not a simply a matter of being better. Susan Golden-
Meadow and David McNeill suggest that speech may have evolved
because it allows the vocal and manual components to serve different and
complimentary purposes. Speech is perfectly adequate to convey syntax,
which has no iconic or mimetic aspect, and can relieve the hands and arms
of this chore. The hands and arms, of course, well adapted to providing the
mimetic aspect of language, indicating in analogue fashion the shapes and
sizes of things, or the direction of movements, as in the gesture that might
accompany any statement “he went that a-way.” By allowing the voice to
take over the grammatical component, the hands are given free rein, as it
were, to provide the mimetic component.
(18) But speech may have evolved, not because it gave the hands freer rein
for mimetic expression, but rather because it freed the hands to do other
activities. Charles Darwin, who seems to have thought of almost everything,
wrote, “We might have used our fingers as efficient instruments, for a person
with practice can report to a deaf man every word of a speech rapidly
delivered at a public meeting, but the loss of our hands, while thus employed,
would have been a serious inconvenience.” It would clearly be difficult to
communicate manually while holding an infant, or driving a car, or carrying a
shopping, yet we can and do talk while doing these things.
(19) Speech has the advantage over manual gestures in that it can be
accomplished in parallel with manual demonstration. Demonstrations might
themselves be considered gestures, of course, but the more explanatory
aspect of pedagogy, involving grammatical structure and symbolic content,
would interfere with manual demonstration if they were too conveyed
manually. Clearly, it is much easier and more informative to talk while
demonstrating than to try to mix linguistic signs in with the demonstration. This
is illustrated by a good TV cooking show, where chefs is seldom at a lost for
either word or ingredients. It may not be far fetch to suppose that the
selective advantages of vocal communication emerged when the hominins
began to develop a more advanced tool technology, and they could
eventually verbally explain what they were doing while they demonstrated
tool-making techniques. Moreover, if vocal language did not become
autonomous until the emergence of Homo sapiens, this might explain why
tools manufacture did not really begin to develop true diversity and
sophistication, and indeed to rival language itself in this respect, until within
the last 100,000 years.
(20) Thus, it was not the emergence of the language itself that gave rise to
the evolutionary explosion that has made our lives so different from our near
relatives, the great apes. Rather, it was the invention of autonomous speech,
freeing the hands for more sophisticated manufacture and allowing
language to disengage from other manual activities, so that people could
communicate while changing the baby’s diapers, and even explain to a
novice what they were doing. The idea that language may have evolved
relatively slow, seems much more in accord with biological reality than the
notion of linguistic “big bang” within the past 200,000 years. Language and
manufacture also allowed cultural transmission to become the dominant
mode of inheritance in human life. That ungainly bird, the jumbo jet, could
not have been created without hundreds, perhaps thousands, of years of
cultural evolution, and the brains that created it were not biologically
superior to the brains that existed in 100,000 years ago in Africa. The invention
of speech may have merely been the first of many developments that have
put us not only on the map, but all over it.
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PUSPOSES (EAPP)
CARMELA G. REYES
T-II SCIENCE CITY OF MUNOZ DIVISION
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Activity
The teacher will as the students to read the text entitled ‘From A
Brief History of English by Paul Roberts’ (the teacher will provide copies to
students)
B. Analysis
C. Abstraction
D. Application
IV. Evaluation
5. Writers also consider opinions and non fact basis in their writings.
V. Assignment
Look for the copy of the text ‘Wrigley’s Chewing Gum’(which will be
used for the next lesson)
VI. Reflection
2. What new or additional learning have you had after taking up this
lesson in terms of skills, content and attitude?
A Brief History of English
By Paul Roberts
(2) The history of our language begins a little after 600 C.E. Everything before
that was pre-history, which means that we can guess at it but can’t prove
much. For a thousand years or so before the birth of Christ, our linguistic
ancestors were savage wandering through the forest of Northern Europe.
Their language was part of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European
family.
(3) At the time of the Roman Empire-say, from the beginning of the Christian
era to around 400 C.E/- the speakers of what was to become English were
scattered along the north coast of Europe. They spoke a dialect of Low
German. More exactly, they spoke several different dialects, since they were
several different tribes. The names given to the tribe who got to English are
Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. For convenience, we can refer to them all as
Anglo-Saxons.
(4) Their first contact with civilization was a rather thin acquaintance with the
Roman Empire on whose borders they lived. Probably some of the Anglo-
Saxons wondered into the empire occasionally, and certainly Roman
merchants and traders travelled among the tribes. At any rate, this period
saw the first if our so many borrowing from Latin. Such words as kettle, wine,
cheese, butter, cheap, plum, gem, bishop, church were borrowed at this
times. They show of the relationships of the Anglo-Saxons with the Romans.
The Anglo-Saxons were learning, getting their first taste of civilization.
(5) They still had a long way to go, however, and their first step was to help
smash the civilization they were learning from. In the fourth century the
Roman power weakened badly. While the Goths were pounding, away at
the Romans in the Mediterranean countries, their relatives, he Anglo-Saxons,
began to attach Britain. (6) The Romans has been the ruling power in Britain
since 43 C.E. They have subjugated the Celts whom they found living there
and had succeeded in settling up a Roman administration. The Roman
influence did not extend to the outlying parts of the British Isles. In Scotland,
Whales, and Ireland the Celts remained free and wild, they made periodic
forays against the Romans in England. Among other defence measures, the
Romans build the famous Roman Walls to ward off the tribes in the north. (7)
Even in England the Roman power was thin. Latin did not become the
language of the country as it did in Gaul and Spain. The mass of people
continued to speak Celtics, with Latin and the Roman civilization it contained
in use as a top dressing.
(8) In the fourth century, troubles multiplied for the Romans in Britain. Not only
did the untamed tribes of Scotland and Whales grow more and more restive,
but also the Anglo-Saxons began to make pirate raids on the eastern coast.
Furthermore, there was growing difficulty everywhere in the Empire, and the
legions in Britain were siphoned off to fight elsewhere. Finally, in 410 C.E. the
last Roman ruler in England, bent on becoming the emperor, left the island
and took the last legions with him. The Celts were left in possession of Britain
but almost defenceless against the impending Anglo-Saxons attack.
(9) Not much is surely known about the arrival of the Anglo-Saxons in England.
According to the best early source, the eighth-century historian Bade, the
Jutes came in 449 in response to a plea from the Celtics king, Vortigern, who
wanted their help against the Picts attacking the north. The Jutes subdue the
Picts, but then quarrelled and fought with Vortigern, and with reinforcement
from the continent, settled permanently in Kent. Somewhat later the Angles
established themselves in the eastern England and the Saxons in the south
and west. Bede’s account is plausible enough, and these were probably the
main lines of the invasion.
(10) We don’t know, however, that the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes were long
time securing themselves in England. Fighting went on for as long as a
hundred years before the Celts in Celts were all killed, driven into Wales, or
reduced to slavery. This is the period of King Arthur, who was not entirely
mythological. He was a Romanized Celt, a general, though probably not a
king. He had some success against the Anglo-Saxons, but it was only
temporary. By 550 or so the Anglo-Saxon were finally established, English was
in England.
(13) When England came into history, it was divided into several more or less
autonomous kingdoms, some of which at times exercised a certain amount
of control over the others. In the century after the conversion the most
advanced kingdom was Northumbrians, the area between the Humber River
and the Scottish border. By 700 C.E the Northumbrians had developed a
respectable civilization, the finest in Europe. It is sometimes called the
Northumbian Renaissance, and it was the first of the several renaissance
through which Europe struggled upward out of the ruins of the Roman
Empire. It was in this period that the best of the Old English literature was
written, including the epic poem Beowulf.
(14) In the Eighth century, Northumbian power declined, and the center of
the influence moved southward to Mercia, the kingdom of Midlands. A
century later center shifted again, and Wessex, the country of the West
Saxons, became the leading power. The most famous king of the West
Saxons was Alfred the Great, who reigned in the second half of the ninth
century, dying in 901. He was famous not only as a military man and
administrator but also as a champion of learning. He founded and supported
schools and translated or caused to be translated many books from Latin into
English. At this time also much of the Northumbian literature of two centuries
earlier was copied in West Saxons. Indeed, the great bulk of Old English
writing which has come down to us is the West Saxon dialect of 900 or later.
(15) In the military sphere, Alfred’s great accomplishment was his successful
opposition to the Viking invasion. In the ninth and tenth centuries, the
Norsemen emerged in their ships from their homeland in Denmark and the
Scandinavian Peninsula. They travelled and attacked and plundered at their
will and almost with impunity. They ravaged Italy and Greece, settled in
France, Russia and Ireland, colonized Iceland and Greenland, and
discovered America several centuries before Columbus. Nor they overlooked
England.
(16) After many years of hit-and-run raids, the Norsemaen landed an army on
the east coast of England in the year 886. There was nothing much to oppose
them except the Wessex power led by Alfred. The long struggle ended in 877
with a treaty by which a line was drawn roughly from the northwest of
England to the southwest. On the eastern side of the line, Norse rule was to
prevail. This was called the Danelaw. The western side was to be governed
by Wessex.
(17) The linguistic result of all this was a considerable injection of Norse into
the English language. Norse was at this time not so different from English as
Norwegian or Danish is now. Probably the speakers of English could
understand, more or less, the language of the new comers who had moved
into eastern England. At any rate, there was considerable interchange and
word borrowing. Examples of Norse words in the English language are sky,
give, law, egg, outlaw, leg, ugly, scant, crawl, scowl, take, thrust. There are
hundreds more. We have even borrowed some pronouns from Norse-they,
their, and them. These words were borrowed first by the eastern and northern
dialects and then in the course of hundreds of years made their way into
English generally.
(19) We may now have an example of Old English. The favourite illustration is
the Lord’s Prayer, since it needs no translation. This has come to us in several
different versions, Here is one:
(20) Some of the differences between this and Modern English are merely
differences in orthography. For instance, the sign æ is what Old English writers
used for a vowel sound like that in modern hat or and. The th sounds of
modern thin or then are represented in Old English by [thorn] or [eth]. But of
course there are many differences in sounds too. Ure is the ancestor of
modern our, but the first vowel was like that in too or ooze. Hlaf is modern
loaf; we have dropped the h sound and changed the vowel, which in half
was pronounce something like the vowel in father. Old English had some
sounds which we do not have. The sound represented by y does not occur in
Modern English. If you pronounced the vowel in bit with your lips rounded,
you may approach it. (21) In grammar, Old English was much more highly
inflected than Modern English is. That is, there were more case endings for
nouns, more person and number ending for verbs, a more complicated
pronoun system, various endings for adjectives, and so on. Old English nouns
had four cases –nominative, genitive, dative, accusative. Adjectives had
five-all these and an instrumental case besides. Present day English has only
two cases from nouns-common case and possessive case. Adjectives now
have no case system at all. On the other hand, we now use more rigid word
order and more structure words (preposition, auxiliaries, and the like) to
express relationships than Old English did.
(22) Some of this grammar we can see in the Lord’s Prayer. Heofonum, for
instance is a dative plural; the nominative singular was heofon. Urne is an
accusative singular; the nominative is ure. In urum gyltendum both words are
dative plural. Forgyfap is the third person plural form of the verb. Word order is
different. “urne gedaeghwamlican half syle us” in place of “Give us our daily
bread.” And so on.
(23) In vocabulary Old English is quite different from Modern English. Most of
the Old English words are what we may call native English; that is, words
which have not been borrowed from other languages but which have been
a part of English ever since English was a part of Indo-European. Old English
did certainly contain borrowed words. We have seen that many borrowing
were coming in from Norse. Rather large numbers had been borrowed from
Latin, too. Some of these were taken while the Anglos-Saxons were still in the
continent (cheese, butter, bishop, kettle, etc.); a large number came into
English after Conversion (angle, candle, priest, martyr, radish, oyster, purple,
school, spend, etc.). But the great majority of Old English words were native
English.
(24) No on the contrary, the majority of words in English are borrowed, taken
mostly from Latin and French. Of the words from The American College
Dictionary only about 14 percent are native. Most of these to be sure, are
common, high frequency words-the, of, I, and because, man, mother, road,
etc.; of the thousand most common words in English, some 62 percent are
native English. Even so, the modern vocabulary is very much Latinized and
Frenchified. The Old English vocabulary was not.
(25) Sometime between the year 1000 and 1200 various important changes
took place in the structure of English, and Old English became Middle English.
The political event which facilitated these changes was the Norman
Conquest. The Normans, as the name shows, came originally from
Scandinavia. In the early tenth century they established themselves in
Northern France, adopted the French language, and developed a vigorous
kingdom and a very passable civilization. In the year 1066, led by Duke
William, they crossed the Channel and made themselves master of England.
For the next several hundred years, England was ruled by kings and whose
first language was French.
(26) One might wonder why, after the Norman Conquest, French did not
become the national language, replacing English entirely. The reason is that
the conquest was not a national migration, as the early Anglo-Saxons
invasion had been. Great numbers of Normans came to England, but they
came as rulers and landlords. French became the language of the court, the
language of nobility, the language of the polite society, the language of
literature. But it did not replace the English language as the language of the
people. There must be hundreds of towns and villages in which French was
never heard except when visitors of high station passed through.
(27) But English, though survived as the national language, was profoundly
changed after the Norman Conquest. Some of the changes-in sound
structure and grammar-would no doubt have taken place whether there
have been a conquest or not. Ever before 1066 the case system of English
nouns and adjectives was becoming simplified; people came to rely more on
word order and prepositions than on inflectional endings to communicate
their meanings. The process was speeded up by sound changes which
caused many of the endings to sound alike. But no doubt the conquest
facilitated the changes. German, which did not experience a Norman
Conquest, is today rather highly inflected compared to its cousin English.
(28) But it is in the vocabulary that the effects of the Conquest are most
obvious. French ceased, after a hundred years or so, to be the native
language of very many people in England, but it continued-and continues
still- to be a zealously cultivated sound language, the mirror of elegance and
civilization. When one spoke English, on introduced not only French ideas and
French things but also their French names. This was not only easy but also
socially useful. To pepper one’s conversation with French expressions was to
show that one was well bred, elegant, au courant. The last sentence shows
that the process was not yet dead. By using au courant instead of, say,
abreast of things, the writer indicates that he is no dull clod who knows only
English but an elegant person aware of how things are done in le haut
monde.
(29) Thus French word came into English, all sorts of them. There were words to
do with government; parliament, majesty, treaty, alliance, tax, government;
church words; parson, sermon, baptism, incense, religion; words for foods;
veal, beef, mutton, bacon, jelly, peach, lemon, cream, biscuit; colours; blue,
scarlet, vermilion, household words; curtain, chair, lamp, towel, blanket,
parlour; play words; dance, chess, music, leisure, conversation; literary words;
story, romance, poet, literary; learned words; study, logic, grammar, noun,
surgeon, anatomy, stomach; just ordinary words of all sorts; nice, second,
very, age, bucket, gentle, final, fault, flower, cry, count, sure, move, surprise,
plain.
(30) All these and thousands more poured into English vocabulary between
1100 and 1500, until at the end of that time, many people must have had
more French words than English at their command. This is not to say that
English became French. English remained English in sound structure and in
grammar, though these also felt the ripples of the French influence. The very
heart of the vocabulary, too, remained English. Most of the high frequency
words-the pronouns, the prepositions, the conjunctions, the auxiliaries, as well
as a great ordinary nouns and verbs and adjectives-were not replaced by
borrowing.
(31) Middle English, then, was still Germanic language, but it differed from Old
English in many ways. The sound system and the grammar change a good
deal. Speakers made less use of case systems and other influencial devices
and relied more on word order and structure words to express their meanings.
This is often said to be simplification, but it isn’t really. Languages don’t
become simpler; they merely exchange one kind of complexity for another.
Modern language is not a simple language, as any foreign speakers who try
to learn it will hasten to tell you.
(32) For us, Middle English is simpler than the Old English just because it is
closer to Modern English. It takes three or four months at least to learn to read
Old English prose and more than that for poetry. But a week of good study
should put one touch with the Middle English poet Chaucer. Indeed you may
be able to make some sense of Chaucer straight off, though you would need
instruction in pronunciation to make it sound like poetry. Here is a famous
passage from the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales, fourteenth
century:
Ther was also a Nonne, a Prioresse. That of hir smyling was ful simple and coy;
Hir gretteste oot was but by Seint Loy; And she was cleped madame
Eglentyne. Ful weel she soong the service dyvyne. Entuned in hir nose ful
seemly, And Frenshe she spak ful faire and fetisly, After the scole of Stratford-
atte-Bowe, For Frenshe of Parys was to hirse unknowe.
(33) Sometime between 1400 and 1600 English underwent a couple of sound
changes which made language of Shakespeare quite different from that of
Chaucer. Incidentally, these changes contributed much to the chaos in
which English spelling now finds itself.
(34) One change was the elimination of a vowel sound in certain unstressed
positions at the end of words. For instance, the words name, stone, wine,
dance were pronounced as two syllables by Chaucer but as just one by
Shakespeare. The e in these words became, as we say, “silent”. But it wasn’t
silent for Chaucer, it represented a vowel sound. So also the words laughed,
seemed, stored would have been pronounced by Chaucer as two-syllable
words. The change was an important one because it affected thousands of
words and gave different aspects to the whole language.
(35) The other change is what is called the Great Vowel Shift. Thus was a
systematic shifting of half a dozen vowels and diphthongs in stressed syllables.
For instance, the word nam had in Middle English a vowel something like that
in the modern word father; wine, had the vowel of modern mean; he was
pronounced something like modern hey; mouse sounded like moose; moon
had the vowel of moan. Again the shift was through going and affected all
the word in which these vowels sounds occurred. Since we still keep the
Middle English system of spelling these words, the differences between
Modern English and Middle English are often more real than apparent.
(36) The vowel shift has meant also that we have come to use an entirely
different set of symbols for representing vowel sounds that is used by the
writers of such languages as French, Italian or Spanish, in which no such vowel
occurred. If you come across a strange word-say, bine-in an English book,
you will announce it according to the English system, with the vowels of wine
or dine. But if you read bine in the French, Italian, or Spanish book, you will
pronounce it with the vowel of mean or seen.
(37) These two changes, then, produced basic differences between Middle
English and Modern English. But there were several other developments that
had an effect upon the language. One was the invention of printing, an
invention introduced to England by William Caxton in the year 1472. Where
before books had been rare and costly, they suddenly become cheap and
common. More and more people learn to read and write. This was the first of
many advances in communication in which have worked to unify languages
and to arrest the development of dialect difference, though of course the
printing affects writing principally rather than speech. Among other things it
hastened the standardization of spelling.
(38) The period of Early Modern English- that is, the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries-was also the period of the English Renaissance, when people
developed, on the other hand, a keen interest in the past and, on the other,
a more daring and imaginative view of the future. New ideas multiplied, and
new ideas meant new languages. Englishmen had grown accustomed to
borrowing words from French as a result of the Norman Conquest; now they
borrowed from Latin and Greek. As we have seen, English have been raiding
Latin from Old English times and before. But now the floodgates really
opened, and thousands of words from the classic languages poured in.
Pedestrian, bonus, anatomy, contradict, climax, dictionary, benefit, multiply,
exist, paragraph, initiate, scene, inspire are random examples. Probably the
average educated American today has more words from French in his
vocabulary than from the native English source and more from Latin than the
French.
(39) The greatest writer of the Early Modern English period is of course
Shakespeare, and the best-known book is the King James Version of the
Bible, published in 1611. The bible (if not Shakespeare) has made many
features of Early Modern English perfectly familiar to many people down to
present time, even though we do not use these features in the present-day
speech and writing. For instance, the old pronounce thou and thee have
dropped out of use now, together with their verb forms, but they are still
familiar to us in prayer and in Biblical quotation. “Whither thou goest, I will go”
Such form as hath and doth have been replaced by has and does, “Goes he
hence tonight? Would now be “Is he going away tonight?” Shakespeare’s
“Fie o’nt, sirrah” would be “Nuts to that, Mac.” Still, all these expressions linger
with us because of the power of the works in which they occur.
(40) It is not always realized, however, that considerable sound changes have
taken place between Early Modern English and the English of the present
day. Shakespearean actors putting on a play speak the words, properly
enough, in their modern pronunciation. But it is very doubtful that this
pronunciation would be understood at all by Shakespeare. In Shakespeare’s
time, the word reason was pronounced raisin; face had the sound of the
modern glass; the l in would, should, palm was pronounce. In these points
and a great many others, the English language has moved a long way from
what it was in 1600.
(41) The history of English since 1700 is filled with many movements and
counter movements, of which we can notice only a couple. One of this is the
vigorous attempt made in the eighteenth century, and rather the half-
hearted attempts made since, to regulate and control the English language.
Many people of the eighteenth century, not understanding very well the
forces which govern the language, proposed to polish and prune and restrict
English, which they felt was proliferating too wildly. There was much talk on an
academy which would rule on what people could and could not say and
write. The academy never came into being, but the eighteenth century did
succeed in establishing certain attitudes which, though they haven’t had
much effect on the development of the language itself, have certainly
changed the native speaker’s feeling about the language.
(42) In part a product of the wish to fix and establish the language was the
development of the dictionary. The first English dictionary was published in
1603; it was a list of 2,500 words briefly defined. Many others were published
with gradual improvement until Samuel Johnson published his English
Dictionary in 1775. This steadily revised, dominated the field in England for
nearly a hundred years. Meanwhile in America, Noah Webster published his
dictionary in 1828, and before long dictionary publishing was a big business in
this country. The last century has seen the publication of one great dictionary;
the twelve volume Oxford English Dictionary, compiled in the course of
seventy-five years through the labour of many scholars. We have also, of
course, numerous commercial dictionaries which are good as the public
wants them to be if not, indeed, rather better.
(43) Another product of the eighteenth century was the invention of “English
Grammar”. As English came to replace Latin as the language of scholarship it
was felt that one should also be able to control and dissect it, parse and
analyse it, as one could Latin. What happened in practice was that the
grammatical description that applied to Latin was removed and
superimposed on English. This was silly, because English is an entirely different
kind of language, with its own forms and signals and ways of producing
meaning. Nevertheless, grammar on the Latin model were worked out and
taught in the schools. In many schools they are still being taught. This activity
is not often popular with school children, but it is sometimes an interesting
and instructive exercise in logic. The principal harm in it is that it has tended to
keep people from being interested in English and has obscured the real
features of English structure.
(44) But probably the most important force in the development of English in
the modern period has been the tremendous expansion of English-speaking
peoples. In 1500 English was minor language, spoken by a few people on a
small island. Now perhaps the greatest language of the world, spoken
natively by over a quarter of a billion people and as a second language by
many millions more. When we speak of English now, we must specify whether
we mean American English, British English, Australian English, Indian English, or
what, since the differences are considerable. The American cannot go to
England, or the Englishman to America confident that he will always
understand and be understood. The Alabaman in Iowa or the Iowan in
Alabama shows himself a foreigner every time he speaks. It is only because
the communication has become fast and easy that English in this period.
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PUSPOSES (EAPP)
CARMELA G. REYES
T-II SCIENCE CITY OF MUNOZ DIVISION
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Activity
B. Analysis
The teacher will discuss the strategies in locating the Topic Sentence.
D. Application
The teacher will post the text entitled Wrigley’s Chewing Gum. Students
will identify the thesis statement of the text.
(2) Wrigley then established his own company; in his company he was selling
soap as a wholesaler, giving baking soda away as a premium, and using a
cook book to promote each deal. Over time, the baking soda and
cookbook became more popular than the soap, so Wrigley began a new
operation selling baking soda, he soon decided on chewing gum. Once
again, when Wrigley realized that the demand for premium was stronger
than the demand for the original product, he created the Wm. Wrigley Jr.
Company to produce and sell chewing gum.
(3) Wrigley started out with two brands of gum, Vassar and Lotta gums, and
soon introduced Juicy Fruit and Spearmint. The latter two brands grew in
popularity, while the first two were phased out. Juicy Fruit and Spearmint are
two of Wrigley’s main brand to this day.
IV. Evaluation
Let the students identify the topic sentence of the following texts:
VI. Reflection
2. What new or additional learning have you had after taking up this
lesson in terms of skills, content and attitude?
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PUSPOSES (EAPP)
CARMELA G. REYES
T-II SCIENCE CITY OF MUNOZ DIVISION
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Activity
2. Randomly, call students, who will read their works in front of the
class. Write the words or academic words students used in their descriptions.
B. Analysis
http://www.screencast.com/users/UniRdg_Library/folders/Study%20Adv
ice/media898c4360-f86d-4808-812a-758d4ef4ac02
D. Application
IV. EVALUATION
VI. Reflection
2. What new or additional learning have you had after taking up this
lesson in terms of skills, content and attitude?
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PUSPOSES (EAPP)
CARMELA G. REYES
T-II SCIENCE CITY OF MUNOZ DIVISION
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Activity
B. Analysis
WHAT IS SUMMARIZING?
3. Select and underline or circle the key ideas and phrases while reading;
another strategy is to annotate the text.
4. Write all key ideas or phrases you identified on the margins or on your
notebook in a bullet or outline form.
5. Without looking at the text, identify the connections of these key ideas and
phrases using a concept map.
8. Ensure that you do not copy a single sentence from the original text.
9. Refrain from adding comments about the text. Stick to the ideas it presents.
11. Compare your output with the original text to ensure accuracy.
12. Record the details of the original source. (author’s name, date of
publication, title, publisher, place of publishing and URL, if online)
FORMATS IN SUMMARIZING
2. Author-Heading Format
In this format, the summarized idea comes after the date when the
material was published.
C. Abstraction
The teacher will present more examples of texts using the three formats
of summarizing.
D. Application
3. After 15minutes students will present their works in front of the class.
IV. Evaluation
In a one half crosswise, the students will explain the following briefly.
1. For you, among the three formats of summarizing, which do you think
is the most applicable of all academic texts? Why?
VI. Reflection
2. What new or additional learning have you had after taking up this
lesson in terms of skills, content and attitude?
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Activity
Let the students brainstorm on the idea below and ask them try
to write the missing letters to complete the words.
B. Analysis
Introduction: Every paper you write have a main point, a main
idea or a central message. The argument(s) you make in your
paper reflect the main idea. The sentence that captures
your position on this main idea is what we call thesis statement.
2. The thesis statement should state just one thing, the one point
you will need to prove. A good paper will often have secondary
purposes but they should not compete with the main
point, the thrust of your research paper.
C. Abstraction
A thesis statement focuses your ideas into one of two sentences.
It should present the topic of your paper and also make a comment about
your position in relation to the topic. Your thesis statement should tell your
reader what the paper is about and also help guide in your writing and keep
your argument focused.
D. Application
Choose two of the subjects listed below and compose a thesis
statement for each.
1. My Favorite Teacher
2. My First Girlfriend/Boyfriend
3. My Family
4. My Failures/Disappointments
5. My Hopes and Fears
Example:
IV. EVALUATION
(1) “The Raven” is a dark and morose poem that leaves the audience
feeling depressed by the last stanza. Poe succeeds in creating that
effect in “The Raven” through the use of repetition and adds to it
through contrast of religious Christian and Greek mythological references.
[Original]
(3) While describing her feelings for her husband in this poem, Anne
Bradstreet uses many symbols to get her point of the love for her
husband across to the reader.
V. ASSIGNMENT
VI. REFLECTION
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Preparation
B. Teaching or Modeling
Aside from summarizing, there are still other skills that can help you
encapsulate the ideas or concepts in a text effectively and one of these is
PARAPHRASING.
The table below lists the similarities and difference between the two
skills:
SUMMARIZING PARAPHRASING
Does not match the source Does not match the source
word for word. word for word.
Involves putting the main idea Involves putting a passage from
into your own words, but a source into your own words.
including only the main points.
Presents a broad overview, so is Changes the words or phrasing
usually much shorter than the of a passage, but retains and
original text fully communicates the original
meaning
Must be attributed to the Must be attributed to the
original source original source
A paraphrase is...
1. Reread the original passage until you understand its full meaning.
2. Set the original aside, and write your paraphrase on a note card.
3. Jot down a few words below your paraphrase to remind you later how
you envision using this material. At the top of the note card, write a key
word or phrase to indicate the subject of your paraphrase.
4. Check your rendition with the original to make sure that your version
accurately expresses all the essential information in a new form.
5. Use quotation marks to identify any unique term or phraseology you
have borrowed exactly from the source.
6. Record the source (including the page) on your note card so that you
can credit it easily if you decide to incorporate the material into your
paper.
Some examples to compare
A legitimate paraphrase:
An acceptable summary:
Students should take just a few notes in direct quotation from sources to help
minimize the amount of quoted material in a research paper (Lester 46-47).
A plagiarized version:
Students often use too many direct quotations when they take notes,
resulting in too many of them in the final research paper. In fact, probably
only about 10% of the final copy should consist of directly quoted material. So
it is important to limit the amount of source material copied while taking
notes.
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/619/1/
North China's Shanxi Province, the country's largest coal supplier and most
polluted region, has the dubious distinction of having 16 cities on the list.
Neither Beijing nor Shanghai appear on the list .The report found that only
22.94 percent of sewage was treated adequately in the cities surveyed and
less than 20 percent of household garbage met with proper handling. It said
178 cities examined had not built any sewage treatment facilities and 130
cities had not been equipped with garbage disposal plants.
Possible answer: The report said that over three-fourths of the total cities
surveyed had inadequate sewage treatment, and 178 had no sewage
treatment plants at all. In addition, 130 cities had no garbage disposal plants,
and indeed, almost 80 percent of household garbage was not treated
according to standards. Shanxi Province, China’s leading coal-producing
area, lead the most polluted list with 16 cities while Beijing and Shanghai
escaped the list entirely
C. Guided Practice
2. It has been reported that the richest one percent of Americans own 40% of
the country's wealth.
3. The judge was relieved when the jury was finally ready to announce its
verdict.
a. When the jury announced its verdict, the judge was relieved.
b. The judge asked the jury to arrive at a verdict.
c. The judge welcomed the prospect of an imminent verdict.
d. The jury welcomed the judge's relief.
4. Research data suggest that girls who witnessed maternal abuse may
tolerate abuse as adults more than girls who did not.
a. Women who witnessed the abuse of their mother as teens are more
likely to become abusive adults.
b. Women who observed the abuse of their mothers when they were
young are more likely to endure abuse themselves.
c. Women who were abused as children are more likely to abuse their
own children.
d. Girls who testify about maternal abuse tolerate abuse as adults more
readily.
Answers: 1. a. 2. c 3. c 4. b 5. b
D. Independent Practice
Using a pen, highlight the keywords or phrases in the original texts and
write your paraphrases. Cite your source properly.
A. “To help practioners integrate skills into the teaching of core academic
subjects, the Partnership has developed a unified, collective vision for
learning known as the Framework for 21st Century Learning. This Framework
describe the skills, knowledge and expertise students must master to succeed
in work and life; it is a blend of content, knowledge, specific skills, expertise
and literacies” (Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2009, p.1).
Reference
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved
from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf
Your paraphrase
B. “Academic writing is best thought of as a circular process. When you begin
your writing, you first need to plan what you are going to write. Your planning
will involve reading sources such as journal articles, books as well as attending
lectures and conferences. While reading and attending lectures, you may
want to take notes, begin to organize all your information and to write a first
draft.” (Institue of Education, 2008 p.10)
Reference
Your paraphrase
Reference
Your paraphrase
IV. EVALUATION
1. A local newspaper claims that 75% of all homeless people do not like
homeless shelters and prefer to live as they do now.
___________________________________________________________________________
___2. Ronny told his aunt that a bear had attacked him, which she found
difficult to believe.
___________________________________________________________________________
___3. Anyone who has ever driven through the Mojave Desert knows that one
should always carry a supply of extra water.
___________________________________________________________________________
___4. Of the 138 million acres of land that Native Americans owned in 1887, 90
million acres were taken away by whites by 1932.
___________________________________________________________________________
___5. A woman who was nominated by the president to head the
department was quickly approved by the board of trustees.
___________________________________________________________________________
___
Possible Answers:
2. Ronny's aunt did not really believe his story about the bear attack.
4. By 1932, Native Americans had less than half of the land they had owned
only 45 years earlier.
5. The board of trustees agreed with the president to appoint a woman head
of the department.
V. ASSIGNMENT
VI. REFLECTION
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Preparation
B. Teaching or Modeling
Outline establishes the “shape” that essay will take. The outline should
be a reflection of an essay’s thesis statement, and in turn, will guide the writer
as to what details are supposed to be included in an essay. It may also help a
writer establish unity and coherence in his or her presentation of ideas. By
unity, we mean that all information found in an essay speak of the thesis
statement, and by coherence, we mean that the ideas in an essay are
logically are logically arranged.
Below is a synopsis of the outline form. The main ideas take roman
numerals. Sub-points under each main idea take capital letters and are
indented. Sub-points under the capital letters, if any, take italic numbers and
are further indented.
I. MAIN IDEA
A. Subsidiary idea or supporting idea to I
B. Subsidiary idea or supporting idea to I
1. Subsidiary idea to B
2. Subsidiary idea to B
a. Subsidiary idea to 2
b. Subsidiary idea to 2
Sample Outline 1
Sample Outline 2
2. Body
A. Weight control
1. Aids self-control
2. Burns calories
3. Encourages a healthy diet
4. Suppresses appetite
B. Muscular Development
1. Improves tone
2. Enhances contours
3. Increases strength
4. Improves endurance
C. Psychological Well-being
1. Aids sleep
2. Inhibits depression
3. Intensifies vitality
D. Cardiovascular Fitness
1. Strengthen heart
2. Lowers blood pressure
3. Changes blood lipids
4. Improves circulation
C. Guided Practice
Direction. Read through the texts. Then, complete the outline for each
text.
Science
A. Solar Energy
1.
_______________________________________________________________
2.
_______________________________________________________________
D. Independent Practice
Direction. Major and minor ideas are mixed together in the lists below.
Put the ideas in logical order by choosing the best idea from the list.
A. Pleasant environment
1. Friendly customers
2. __________________
a. Helpful co-workers
b. Flexible hour
c. Holiday bonus
B. Good schedule
1. Short shifts
2. __________________
a. Helpful co-workers
b. Flexible hour
c. Holiday bonus
C. Good pay
1. Generous Tips
2. ___________________
a. Helpful co-workers
b. Flexible hour
c. Holiday bonus
IV. EVALUATION
Direction. The major and minor details are mixed together in the two
groups that follow. The major details in each group support a given main
idea. Separate the major from the minor details by filling in the outline.
Surprise Quizzes
A great deal of writing
Three major tests
Many tests
Term paper
Several Novels
Several short stories
Extensive reading loads
Frequent writing assignments
Written summaries of articles assigned
Reading magazines and newspapers articles
Comprehensive final exam
Major Detail
1.
______________________________________________________
a.
_________________________________________________
Minor Details
b.
_________________________________________________
c.
_________________________________________________
Major Detail 2.
______________________________________________________
a.
_________________________________________________
Minor Details
b.
_________________________________________________
c.
_________________________________________________
Major Detail 3.
______________________________________________________
a.
_________________________________________________
Minor Details
b.
__________________________________________________
c.
__________________________________________________
V. ASSIGNMENT
Select two or three chapters from other textbooks in natural and social
sciences, and prepare an outline for each. Make sure your output adheres to
the conventions of outlining discussed in the lesson.
VI. REFLECTION
What were your misconceptions about the topic prior to taking up the
lesson?
What new or additional learning have you had other taking up this
lesson in terms of skills, content and attitude?
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Preparation
The teacher will show a short film. Watch the video clip and
make sure to note the details.
Using only three sentences, tell the plot of the story.
B. Teaching or Modeling
Suppose you told your friend that you just watched a great film and
your friend asks what the story is. What would you do? Would you tell the story
as it is from the opening scene to the end credits or would you simply talk
about the essential parts of the movie? You’ll probably agree that the latter is
the more practical choice and you are correct. More often than not, the gist
or the most significant or important part is what is given out to provide a
background, not only in talking about movie plots but also in writing
academic and professional papers.
What is summarizing?
Guidelines in Summarizing
2. Read a text and understand the meaning. Do not stop reading until
you understand the message conveyed by the author. Locate the gist or
main idea of the text, which can usually be found either at the beginning, in
the middle, or in the end.
3. Select and underline or circle the key ideas and phrases while
reading: another strategy is to annotate the text.
8. Ensure that you do not copy a single sentence from the original text.
9. Refrain from adding comments about the text.
13. Format your summary properly. Use different formats to show variety
in writing.
FORMATS IN SUMMARIZING
C. Guided Practice
Text 1
Text 2
D. Independent Practice
Using their understanding about summarizing, the students will choose
a partner and summarize the given academic text.
IV. EVALUATION
V. ASSIGNMENT
Choose your favorite book or movie and write a summary of its plot.
Make sure to follow the format below.
Century Gothic 12
1.5 Spacing
1” margin on all sides
Short bond paper
VI. REFLECTION
What were your misconceptions about the topic prior to taking up the
lesson?
What new or additional learning have you had other taking up this
lesson in terms of skills, content and attitude?
A SEMI-DETAILED LESSON PLAN IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND
PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES
I. OBJECTIVE
III. PROCEDURE
A. Preparation
B. Teaching or Modeling
Rationale
Research Problems (around 10%)
Methodology (around 20%)
Major findings (around 40%)
Conclusion and Implications (around 10%)
1. Read the text at least twice until you fully understand its content.
2. Highlight the key ideas and phrases.
3. Annotate the text.
4. State the author’s name, the title of the passage and the main idea at the
beginning sentence.
5. Use words or phrases indicating that you are presenting an abstract, précis,
or summary. Reporting verbs are the most useful for this purpose.
6. Write the main idea of each paragraph using your own words. In some
cases, you can write one main idea for multiple paragraphs particularly of a
research paper.
7. Never copy in verbatim a single sentence from the original text.
8. Combine the main ideas to form one paragraph. Use appropriate
transitional devices to improve cohesion.
9. Refrain from adding comments about the text. Stick to the ideas presented
in the text.
10. Compare your output with the original text to ensure accuracy.
C. Guided Practice
Original Text
Summarized Text
VGE GE SE LE N
5 4 3 2 1
CONTENT (35%)
Paper accurately reflects the content of the
original text while incorporating only the key
ideas.
Key ideas from the original text are reworded
without compromising accuracy or content.
Proper incorporates the name of the author
and title of the text at the start of the summary.
Specific examples are excluded in the abstract,
précis, or summary
This paper is free from personal comments or
opinions.
Proper uses appropriate length.
ORGANIZATION (25%)
Paper employs an organizational pattern and
structure appropriate for the genre.
Cohesive devices are effectively used.
Ideas are correctly placed which improves the
paper’s organization.
Flow of ideas is smooth and easy to read.
STYLE (20%)
Paper showcases the writer’s voice
Proper uses a variety of sentence structures
Paper eliminates sexist language
Paper uses language appropriate to context
Paper eliminates wordiness.
GRAMMAR AND MECHANICS (10%)
Grammar is accurate.
Spelling, capitalization, and punctuations are
correctly used.
Word Choice is appropriate.
Sentences are well-structured.
D. Independent Practice
Title of text:
________________________________________________________________
Author of the text: _________________________________________________________
Purpose: __________________________________________________________________
Target Outputs: ___________________________________________________________
Audience: ________________________________________________________________
Writer’s Persona: __________________________________________________________
Tone/Formality: ___________________________________________________________
B. Within 15 minutes, read the following text before writing your own abstract,
précis, or summary. Keep the following questions in mind while reading.
__________ 1. Kip adds his own explanations to some of the key ideas he writes
in his summary.
__________ 2. Joey copies in verbatim some of the sentences from the original
text.
__________ 3. Rachel highlights the key ideas in the original text while reading
it.
__________ 4. Monica includes the specific examples that the original text
while reading it.
__________ 5. Janice presents her summary in bullet form.
__________ 6. Mona reads her summary and compares it to the original text.
__________ 7. Emily reads the original text several times until she fully
understands it.
__________ 8. Gunther writes a research abstract without any major findings in
it.
__________ 9. Ross writes in his summary how he feels after reading the text to
be summarized.
__________ 10. Candace write the name of the author, year of publication,
and title of the text at the beginning of the summary.
V. ASSIGNMENT
https://yuwritingcenter.wikispaces.com/file/view/Writing+an+abs
tract_exercise.pdf
VI. REFLECTION
What were your misconceptions about the topic prior to taking up the
lesson?
What new or additional learning have you had other taking up this
lesson in terms of skills, content and attitude?