CombinandodutyratioyfrequenceDAB DC AC
CombinandodutyratioyfrequenceDAB DC AC
CombinandodutyratioyfrequenceDAB DC AC
Abstract—This paper presents a combined phase-shift and fre- power quality ac–dc converters is given in [3], whereas [4] sum-
quency modulation scheme of a dual–active-bridge (DAB) ac– marizes single-phase nonisolated PFC topologies based on the
dc converter with power factor correction (PFC) to achieve zero boost converter approach.
voltage switching (ZVS) over the full range of the ac mains voltage.
The DAB consists of a half bridge with bidirectional switches on the A DAB converter topology with a rectified ac line voltage
ac side and a full bridge on the dc side of the isolation transformer to as input is presented in [5]–[7], where modulation schemes for
accomplish single-stage power conversion. The modulation scheme the ac–dc operation under zero voltage switching (ZVS) con-
is described by means of analytical formulas, which are used in an ditions are derived. Approaches where the DAB is connected
optimization procedure to determine the optimal control variables directly to the ac line voltage by applying bidirectional switches
for minimum switch commutation currents. Furthermore, an ac
current controller suitable for the proposed modulation scheme are given in [8]–[10]. In [10], a modulation scheme that guar-
is described. A loss model and measurements on a 3.3-kW elec- antees ac-side zero current switching (ZCS) and dc-side ZVS
tric vehicle battery charger to connect to the 230 Vrms / 50-Hz is presented. The main drawbacks of the modulation are the
mains considering a battery voltage range of 280–420 V validate the high transformer peak currents that substantially limit the effi-
theoretical analysis. ciency of the converter. The operation proposed in [9] allows a
Index Terms—AC–DC Converter, bidirectional, isolated, power three-level pulsewidth modulation on the ac side while achiev-
factor correction, zero voltage switching. ing either ZVS or ZCS conditions for all switching devices in
all points of operation. Nevertheless, through the applied com-
I. INTRODUCTION mutation control, the switching frequency and in turn the power
HE power conversion from ac to dc or vice versa has be- density of the converter is rather limited.
T come a fundamental part of the electricity infrastructure
since many applications demand either a dc source or a dc sink.
In general, several modulation methods like phase-shift mod-
ulation, triangular, and trapezoidal current mode modulation [1],
Even for electrical machines, ac frontend rectifiers are in place [11], [12] have been investigated for the operation of a DAB.
with subsequent inverters driving the machines. In some cases, Besides the commonly used control variables like phase-shifts
also galvanic isolation between ac and dc side is needed or and clamping intervals, also the switching frequency is consid-
even mandatory to be compliant with standards. Isolated ac–dc ered to control a DAB in [7] and [13] to boost the efficiency in
converters are used for instance for charging electric vehicles, light-load operation as well as to maintain ZVS conditions in
interfacing storage batteries for uninterruptible power supplies full ac–dc operation.
or supplying energy from photovoltaic systems to the grid. In This paper focuses on the DAB ac–dc converter presented in
order to keep the conducted electromagnetic interference low, [14], where bidirectional switches are applied on the ac side.
the harmonic content of the ac current has to be limited. Further- The discussed combined phase-shift and frequency modulation
more, to reduce losses in distribution grids, a converter equip- strategy is generalized in this paper so that the control variables
ment should draw mainly active power with a power factor (PF) are found by an optimization to achieve ZVS over the whole ac
close to unity. mains voltage for minimum commutation currents. Especially
For isolated power conversion from ac to dc, the conventional with the use of silicon power MOSFETs, hard switching con-
approach is a two-stage solution with a boost power factor cor- ditions in terms of forced body diode commutations lead to
rection (PFC) rectifier and a subsequent high-frequency isolated relatively high switching losses (high reverse recovery losses),
dc–dc converter such as a dual-active-bridge (DAB) [1] or a res- and therefore, to a reduced efficiency of the converter system.
onant dc–dc converter [2]. Besides this two-stage conversion, Furthermore, hard switching can lead in the worst case to the
several single-stage isolated ac–dc PFC converter topologies destruction of the semiconductor devices. For these reasons, this
have been proposed. A review of state-of-the-art single-phase paper focuses on developing a modulation scheme to allow ZVS
for all switches of the DAB at every time instant of the ac mains
voltage.
Manuscript received April 15, 2015; revised September 17, 2015 and Novem-
ber 25, 2015; accepted December 30, 2015. Date of publication January 08, First, in Section II, the DAB ac–dc converter topology is
2016; date of current version July 08, 2016. This paper was presented at the 15th explained. The operating principle in ac-to-dc and dc-to-ac op-
International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE-PEMC eration including the mathematical analysis of the modulation
2012/ECCE Europe), Novi Sad, Serbia, September 4–6, 2012. Recommended
for publication by Associate Editor B. Wang. scheme is discussed in Section III. There, also the derivation of
The authors are with the Laboratory for High Power Electronic Systems, ETH the optimal control variables and the design of an ac input cur-
Zurich, Zurich 8092, Switzerland (e-mail: jauchf@ethz.ch; jbiela@ethz.ch). rent controller is given. Finally, Section IV shows a hardware
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. prototype system including a detailed loss model and experi-
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TPEL.2016.2515850 mental results for validating the theoretical analysis.
0885-8993 © 2016 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
8388 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 31, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2016
⎪
⎪
2
(τ − τ5 ) + iL σ (τ5 ) τ5 ≤ τ ≤ τ6
⎪
⎪
Lσ
⎪
⎪ |v |
⎪
⎪ − 2 1
⎪
⎪ L σ (τ − τ6 ) + iL σ (τ6 ) τ 6 ≤ τ ≤ τ7
⎪
⎪
⎪
⎩ − |v21 | +n V 2
Lσ (τ − τ7 ) + iL σ (τ7 ) τ7 ≤ τ ≤ τ8
(3)
with the values at the points in time
1
|v1 | + (4g + 2w − 1)nV2
iL σ (τ0 ) = − 2 (4)
4fs Lσ
Fig. 3. Primary and secondary transformer voltages v p , v s and transformer
leakage inductance current iL σ over one switching period T s in ac-to-dc opera-
(2g − 2si − 12 ) |v1 | − (2w + 4si − 1)nV2
iL σ (τ1 ) = (5)
tion. The gate signals of the ac-side switches differ for a positive and a negative 4fs Lσ
ac line voltage.
(2g − 12 ) |v1 | − (2w − 1)nV2
iL σ (τ2 ) = (6)
4fs Lσ
the switching period Ts = 1/fs are introduced. g is the phase
shift between the ac side applied square-wave voltage vp and (2g + 2w − 12 ) |v1 | − (2w − 1)nV2
iL σ (τ3 ) = (7)
the dc side applied square-wave voltage vs as shown in Fig. 3. 4fs Lσ
w represents the length of the dc-side clamping interval. More- 1
|v1 | + (4g + 2w − 1)nV2
2
over, the interlocking interval ti = si Ts is considered, which iL σ (τ4 ) = (8)
4fs Lσ
corresponds to the dead time between the turn-off and the turn-
on of a switch in a half bridge. This time interval is taken into (2g − 2si − 12 ) |v1 | − (2w + 4si − 1)nV2
account since it leads to a substantial contribution to the power iL σ (τ5 ) = − (9)
4fs Lσ
transfer especially at high switching frequencies. In a state
machine realization for generating the gate signals for the (2g − 12 ) |v1 | − (2w − 1)nV2
iL σ (τ6 ) = − (10)
switches, this interval is usually kept constant so that no external 4fs Lσ
control possibilities exist to adjust it. Therefore, the derivation (2g + 2w − 12 ) |v1 | − (2w − 1)nV2
of the power flow equation incorporates the dead time to im- iL σ (τ7 ) = − . (11)
4fs Lσ
prove the converter model from which the control variables g
and w are derived for a given reference power. The points in time τ1 and τ5 are not necessary for the ana-
It is assumed that the resonant transition for a minimum com- lytical determination of the power-flow equation. Nevertheless,
mutation current takes place rather slowly. This means that the they are required for calculating the turn-off currents for stating
voltage change on the transformer winding occurs near the end the ZVS conditions as shown later. The allowed intervals of the
of the interlocking interval. The assumption coincides with the control variables g and w are given by
measurements shown in [15], where the charging behavior of a 1
MOSFETs output capacitance is observed to be not time recip- si ≤ g ≤ (12)
2
rocal to its discharging behavior.
1
In Fig. 3, the resulting transformer leakage inductance cur- 0≤w≤ − g. (13)
rent iL σ and the gate signals of the switches for a positive and a 2
negative mains voltage are given. For the following mathemat- The boundaries for the control variables g and w arise from
ical analysis, the voltages applied to the transformer windings the applied general trapezoidal current mode modulation [12]
8390 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 31, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2016
Fig. 6. Converter efficiencies for the prototype system depending on the trans-
former leakage inductance peak current iL σ (τ 2 ) for different parameterizations
with the switching frequency fs and the power p t . The efficiencies are given at
the ac voltage amplitude v 1 = 325 V and the dc voltage V 2 = 350 V at a given
dc power operating point p t .
Fig. 5. Flow chart of the optimization algorithm to derive optimal control
variables g, w, T s for ZVS conditions for a given set of converter parameters
n, L σ , V 2 and a reference current amplitude Iˆ1∗ . in Figs. 3 and 4) that is required for ZVS is kept minimal what
in turn results in minimal transformer leakage inductance peak
Fig. 3 for ac-to-dc operation are given by currents.
The minimization of the peak current in every switching cycle
iL σ (τ0 ) < −Is (17) leads to the maximum converter efficiency as shown in Fig. 6 for
iL σ (τ1 ) > Is (18) different parameterizations with the switching frequency fs and
the power pt . There, the efficiencies at the ac voltage amplitude
iL σ (τ4 ) > Is (19) v1 = 325 V and the dc voltage V2 = 350 V are evaluated by
iL σ (τ5 ) < −Is (20) iterating over the phase shift g ∈ [si , 1/2] for a constant switch-
ing frequency fs and a given dc power operating point pt for the
where Is is the minimum commutation current required for the prototype system described later. With increasing phase shift g
resonant transition during the interlocking interval. With these the clamping interval w is decreased to keep the power pt con-
conditions, ZVS is inherently guaranteed also for the switching stant. As the phase shift increases also the leakage inductance
instants τ2 , τ3 , τ6 , τ7 in Fig. 3. In the same way, the ZVS condi- peak current iL σ (τ2 ) (see Fig. 3) increases and the converter
tions in dc-to-ac operation can be derived. Introducing energy efficiency drops. The starting point of the phase shift where the
equivalent capacitances Ceq,p , Ceq,s for the parallel connection efficiency exhibits its maximum guarantees that iL σ (τ0 ) < 0 as
of the drain–source capacitances of the ac-/dc-side bridge leg, well as iL σ (τ1 ) > 0.
the minimum commutation current can be determined as The optimization problem is formulated as
⎧ ⎫
⎨ v V ⎬ min (|iL σ (τ0 , x)| , |iL σ (τ1 , x)|) (22)
1 2
Is = max , . (21) x
⎩ Lσ Lσ ⎭
C eq, p C eq, s with respect to
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ 1 ⎤
Compared to [14], where the current points have been fixed to g si 2
⎢ ⎥
the minimum commutation current, a general approach to derive x = ⎣ w ⎦ with xlb = ⎣ 0 ⎦, xub = ⎣ 21 − g ⎦ (23)
the control variables for ZVS conditions using an optimization Ts Ts,min Ts,max
is described. This is presented in the next section.
where x denotes the vector of control variables, which is re-
D. Optimal Control Variables stricted to lower and upper bounds xlb , xub respectively. The
first constraint is given by the power equality constraint
For the combined phase-shift and frequency modulation,
there are three degrees of freedom in the modulation scheme. pt (t, x) = p∗t (t) (24)
These are the phase shift g, the length of the clamping interval
w, and the switching period Ts . At each point of the ac mains with the reference of the instantaneous power p∗t (t) for a given
voltage, these control variables are derived by minimizing the input current amplitude Iˆ1∗
absolute value of the transformer leakage inductance current iL σ ω (C1 + C2 ) 2
at the time instants τ0 and τ1 for a minimal commutation current p∗t (t) = V̂1 Iˆ1∗ sin2 (ωt) − V̂1 sin(ωt) cos(ωt).
4
as shown in Fig. 5. In this way, the reactive power (shaded areas (25)
8392 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 31, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2016
TABLE I
PARAMETERS OF THE HARDWARE PROTOTYPE SYSTEM
TABLE II
COMPONENTS OF THE HARDWARE PROTOTYPE SYSTEM
Fig. 11. Calculated efficiencies of the DAB ac–dc converter applying the pro-
posed combined phase-shift and frequency modulation over the output power
range for battery voltages 280, 350, and 420 V. Additionally, the calculated
efficiency curve for the converter operated with the standard phase-shift modu-
lation and the measured efficiency of the hardware prototype both at a battery
voltage of 350 V are shown.
Fig. 10. 2-D drawing of the transformer including its reluctance model con-
sisting of C-cores forming an E-core with the ac-side winding W p wound around IV. HARDWARE PROTOTYPE
the inner leg and the dc-side winding W s around the inner and the right-hand
sided stray leg. By inserting an air gap of length δσ in the stray leg, the leakage For validating the combined phase-shift and frequency mod-
inductance L σ can be set.
ulation, an electric vehicle battery charger for Lithium-ion bat-
teries with 3.3-kW output power to connect to the single-phase
with GPI being the transfer function of the PI controller ac mains has been built and is shown in Fig. 9. The parameters
of the hardware prototype are given in Table I.
KI KI
GPI = KP + =K K P + . (33) A. Converter Components and Loss Model
s s
In the following, the converter components with their loss
P = 0, the closed-loop transfer function can be models are presented for evaluating the converter efficiencies at
By setting K
different operating points. Table II summarizes the components
simplified to a first-order system
of the hardware prototype, whereas Fig. 11 shows the calculated
1 efficiencies over the output power range for battery voltages of
Gcl = 1 (34) 280, 350, and 420 V. For low output power, the efficiency curves
1+ I
K
s
diverge because of the high transformer leakage inductance peak
where the rise time from 10% to 90% of the steady-state value currents occurring at high output voltages. In low power mode,
in the step response is given by mainly a triangular-like leakage inductance current occurs at
the maximum switching frequency where the peak current is
2.2 directly proportional to the output voltage.
tr = . (35)
I
K Additionally, the efficiency of the converter applying the
standard phase-shift modulation without the use of the dc-side
Since the controller tracks a sinusoidal waveform, the rise time clamping interval (w = 0) is depicted in Fig. 11. The switching
should be kept small in the magnitude of a few switching periods frequency is fixed at 60 kHz, which corresponds to the average
Ts,max at the lowest switching frequency. With a rise time of of the control variable fs depicted in Fig. 7 for an input current
tr = 100 μs, the controller gains are determined to be KP = 0 of 16 Arms and an output voltage of 350 V. The leakage induc-
and KI = 22 000. tance of the transformer is slightly adjusted to 12 μH to allow
8394 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 31, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2016
with i = {1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5, 6}. The hardware prototype ap-
plies two MOSFETs in parallel for all switches (Ns = 2). For
conduction loss calculations, a worst-case junction temperature
of 100 ◦ C is assumed.
2) Transformer: For the proposed modulation to work prop-
erly, the transformer turns ratio has to guarantee vC 3 > V̂1 /2
(with vC 3 referred to the ac side of the transformer), also at
the lowest battery voltage of 280 V. Furthermore, the leakage
inductance Lσ is designed such that the peak of the instanta-
neous power P̂1 [neglecting the reactive power term in (25)] at
full input power of 3.68 kW can be transferred at the lowest
switching frequency of 20 kHz and the lowest battery voltage
Fig. 12. Calculated efficiencies of the DAB ac–dc converter over the out- of 280 V. This can be done by using (16) and solving for Lσ .
put power range for battery voltages 280 and 420 V applying two parallel The transformer is built of two AMCC-4 C-cores [20] made of
STY139N65M5 MOSFETs (R ds, on = 23.8 mΩ at T j = 100 ◦ C) from STMi- VITROPERM 500 [21] material forming an E-core. To increase
croelectronics [18] (solid lines) and three parallel IPW65R019C7 MOSFETs
(R ds, on = 32.5 mΩ at T j = 100 ◦ C) from Infineon [19] (dashed lines). the core area, two of them are stacked. The ac-side winding is
wound around the center leg and the dc-side winding around
the center and an outer stray leg [22]. Fig. 10 depicts a 2-D
drawing of the transformer including its reluctance model with
the flux sources Φp , Φs (driven by the applied winding voltages
vp , vs ) and the magnetic core reluctances Rm 1 , Rm 2 , Rm 3 . An
air gap δσ is inserted in the stray leg to get the desired leak-
age inductance which is modeled by the leakage reluctance
Rσ . In the loss model, the core losses per volume are calcu-
lated by applying the improved generalized Steinmetz equation
Fig. 13. Calculated loss distribution between the converter components at the
(iGSE) [23].
maximum output power of 3.56 kW and a battery voltage of 350 V. For the ac- and dc-side windings, copper foil is used where
the optimal foil thickness is calculated according to [24], which
gives a minimum value of effective ac resistance. These values
the maximum power to be transferred in case of the phase-shift
are 132 and 116 μm. For the hardware prototype, 120-μm copper
modulation. Especially the ac-side MOSFETs are operated un-
foil is chosen, with 10 primary and 13 secondary turns. The skin
der hard switching conditions in the region of low output power
and proximity effect losses per unit length in foil conductors
so that the efficiency drastically drops what in turn can lead in
for each current harmonic are then calculated according to [25].
the worst case to the destruction of the semiconductor devices.
The external magnetic field strength for calculating proximity
The loss distribution between the components at the maxi-
losses is derived by a 1-D approximation based on the Dowell
mum output power of 3.56 kW and a battery voltage of 350 V
method [26] as the air gap in the stray leg is relatively small and
is depicted in Fig. 13.
losses caused by the fringing field can be neglected.
Fig. 12 shows the calculated efficiencies of the DAB ac–dc
3) Inductors: For the ac- and dc-side inductors L1 , L2 two
converter for battery voltages 280 and 420 V for the consid-
stacked E-cores of type Kool Mu 4317 with material 26u from
ered prototype system applying two parallel STY139N65M5
Magnetics [27] are used. Powder cores are ideally suited for
MOSFETs from STMicroelectronics [18] (solid lines) and for a
the hardware prototype because they offer a distributed air gap
converter solution applying three parallel IPW65R019C7 MOS-
and a high saturation flux density. This is advantageous over a
FETs from Infineon [19] (dashed lines).
ferrite core with a large air gap exhibiting considerable fringing
1) Power MOSFETs: Since the proposed modulation
magnetic field. Both inductors are wound with the litz wire with
scheme guarantees ZVS at every switching instant, MOSFET
20 strands of diameter 0.355 mm and a turns number of 27 so
devices with a comparable low on-state resistance are chosen.
that a minimum inductance value of 100 μH is guaranteed at the
The used device is a 650-V MOSFET with an on-state resis-
highest peak current.
tance of 14 mΩ from STMicroelectronics [18]. The losses of the
Again, the core losses per volume are calculated by using the
power MOSFETs are mainly determined by conduction losses.
iGSE, the Steinmetz parameters are obtained from [27]. The
The switching loss energy ESi,sw per MOSFET depending on
skin and proximity effect losses per unit length in the litz wire
the drain–source current is approximated by the turn-off loss
for each current harmonic are calculated according to [25]. Also
curves given in the datasheet as well as measurement data and
for the inductors, the external magnetic field strength is derived
linearly scaled with the drain–source voltage vSi . To reduce con-
by a 1-D approximation [26].
duction losses, Ns number of MOSFETs are paralleled so that
4) Capacitors: For the ac- and dc-side capacitors C1 , C2 ,
the power loss per switch is then approximated by
C3 , paralleled 560-nF ceramic capacitors with dielectric X7R
Rds,on 2 vSi from Syfer [28] are used. For achieving high power densities,
PSi = ISi + Ns fs ESi,sw (36) multilayer ceramic capacitors are ideally suited because they
Ns 400 V
JAUCH AND BIELA: COMBINED PHASE-SHIFT AND FREQUENCY MODULATION OF A DUAL-ACTIVE-BRIDGE 8395
Fig. 18. Experimental ac input current harmonics compared √ to the IEC 61000-
3-2 class A standard for an input current reference Iˆ1∗ = 2 · 8 Arms and an
output voltage of 350 V in ac-to-dc operation for a mains voltage of 230 Vrms .
[5] J. Everts, J. Van den Keybus, and J. Driesen, “Switching control strategy to [24] W. G. Hurley, E. Gath, and J. G. Breslin, “Optimizing the AC resistance of
extend the ZVS operating range of a dual active bridge AC/DC converter,” multilayer transformer windings with arbitrary current waveforms,” IEEE
in Proc. Energy Convers. Congr. Expo., 2011, pp. 4107–4114. Trans. Power Electron., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 369–376, Mar. 2000.
[6] J. Everts, F. Krismer, J. Van den Keybus, J. Driesen, and J. W. Kolar, [25] J. Lammeraner and M. Stafl, Eddy Currents. London, U.K.: Iliffe Books
“Comparative evaluation of soft-switching, bidirectional, isolated AC/DC Ltd., 1966.
converter topologies,” in Proc. 27th Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., [26] P. Dowell, “Effects of eddy currents in transformer windings,” Proc. IEE,
2012, pp. 1067–1074. vol. 113, no. 8, pp. 1387–1394, Aug. 1966.
[7] J. Everts, F. Krismer, J. Van den Keybus, J. Driesen, and J. Kolar, “Optimal [27] (2015). [Online]. Available: http://www.mag-inc.com
ZVS modulation of single-phase single-stage bidirectional DAB AC-DC [28] (2015). [Online]. Available: http://www.syfer.com
converters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 3954–3970, [29] U. Drofenik, A. Stupar, and J. W. Kolar, “Analysis of theoretical limits of
Aug. 2014. forced-air cooling using advanced composite materials with high thermal
[8] K. Vangen, T. Melaa, and A. K. Adnanes, “Soft-switched high-frequency, conductivities,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol., vol. 1, no. 4,
high power DC/AC converter with IGBT,” in Proc. 23rd Power Electron. pp. 528–535, Apr. 2011.
Spec. Conf., 1992, pp. 26–33.
[9] S. Norrga, “Experimental study of a soft-switched isolated bidirectional
AC-DC converter without auxiliary circuit,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron.,
vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1580–1587, Nov. 2006. Felix Jauch (S’11) received the Bachelor’s degree
[10] N. Weise, G. Castelino, K. Basu, and N. Mohan, “A single-stage dual- in electrical engineering and information technol-
active-bridge-based soft switched AC-DC converter with open-loop power ogy from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technol-
factor correction and other advanced features,” IEEE Trans. Power Elec- ogy (ETH) in Zurich, Switzerland, in August 2008,
tron., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 4007–4016, Aug. 2014. and the master’s degree in October 2010, from ETH
[11] F. Krismer, J. Biela, and J. W. Kolar, “A comparative evaluation of iso- Zurich. His master thesis dealt with developing a test
lated bi-directional DC/DC converters with wide input and output voltage environment for high frequency converter for ultra-
range,” in Proc. 40th Ind. Appl. Conf., 2005, vol. 1, pp. 599–606. high-speed electrical drive systems and was carried
[12] F. Jauch and J. Biela, “Generalized modeling and optimization of a bidirec- out with the ETH spin-off company Celeroton. Since
tional dual active bridge DC-DC converter including frequency variation,” January 2011, he has been working toward the Ph.D.
in Proc. Int. Power Electron. Conf., May. 2014, pp. 1788–1795. degree with the Laboratory for High Power Electronic
[13] G. Guidi, M. Pavlovsky, A. Kawamura, T. Imakubo, and Y. Sasaki, “Im- Systems, ETH, focusing on fast charging stations for electric vehicles.
provement of light load efficiency of dual active bridge DC-DC converter During his studies, he focused on power electronics, electrical drives, and
by using dual leakage transformer and variable frequency,” in Proc. Energy electric power systems. After he had received his bachelor’s degree, he worked
Convers. Congr. Expo., 2010, pp. 830–837. at Bombardier Transportation, Switzerland as an Intern, where he developed
[14] F. Jauch and J. Biela, “Single-phase single-stage bidirectional isolated electronic equipment for a test environment for traction converters.
ZVS AC-DC converter with PFC,” in Proc. 15th Int. Power Electron.
Motion Control Conf., 2012, pp. LS5d.1-1–LS5d.1-8.
[15] J. Fedison, M. Fornage, M. Harrison, and D. Zimmanck, “Coss related
energy loss in power MOSFETs used in zero-voltage-switched appli- Jürgen Biela (S’04–M’06) received the Diploma
cations,” in Proc. 29th Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., Mar. 2014, (Hons.) degree from Friedrich-Alexander Universität
pp. 150–156. Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany, in 1999,
[16] F. Rodriguez, E. Bueno, M. Aredes, L. G. B. Rolim, F. Neves, and M. C. and the Ph.D. degree from the Swiss Federal Institute
Cavalcanti, “Discrete-time implementation of second order generalized of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, in
integrators for grid converters,” in Proc. 34th Conf. Ind. Electron., 2008, 2006.
pp. 176–181. He joined the Research Department, Siemens
[17] M. Ciobotaru, R. Teodorescu, and V. Agelidis, “Offset rejection for PLL A&D, Erlangen, Germany, in 2000, where he has
based synchronization in grid-connected converters,” in Proc. 23rd Appl. been involved in inverters with very high switching
Power Electron. Conf. Expo., 2008, pp. 1611–1617. frequencies, SiC components, and EMC. In 2002,
[18] (2015). [Online]. Available: http://www.st.com he joined the Power Electronic Systems Laboratory,
[19] (2015). [Online]. Available: http://www.infineon.com ETH Zurich, focusing on optimized electromagnetically integrated resonant
[20] (2015). [Online]. Available: http://www.hitachimetals.com converters. From 2006 to 2007, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow with the Power
[21] (2015). [Online]. Available: http://www.vacuumschmelze.de Electronic Systems Laboratory, and a Guest Researcher with the Tokyo Institute
[22] U. Badstuebner, J. Biela, and J. W. Kolar, “Power density and efficiency of Technology, Tokyo, Japan. From 2007 to 2010, he was a Senior Research
optimization of resonant and phase-shift telecom DC-DC converters,” in Associate with the Power Electronic Systems Laboratory. Since 2010, he has
Proc. 23rd Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., 2008, pp. 311–317. been an Associate Professor of high-power electronic systems with ETH Zurich.
[23] K. Venkatachalam, C. Sullivan, T. Abdallah, and H. Tacca, “Accurate His current research interests include the design, modeling, and optimization of
prediction of ferrite core loss with nonsinusoidal waveforms using only PFC, dc–dc and multilevel converters with an emphasis on passive components,
Steinmetz parameters,” in Proc. IEEE 8th Workshop Comput. Power Elec- the design of pulsed-power systems, and power electronic systems for future
tron., Jun. 2002, pp. 36–41. energy distribution.