Clogging Mechanism of Permeable Concrete A Review
Clogging Mechanism of Permeable Concrete A Review
Clogging Mechanism of Permeable Concrete A Review
Abstract: Urbanization results in the conversion of pervious spaces to areas of impervious (paved)
surface which creates numerous problems such as erosion, flash floods, pollution of rivers and hot
island in city. A sustainable solution to this problem is to use permeable pavements which only began
to find application in Australia recently. Permeable pavements can facilitate biodegradation of oils
from cars and trucks, help rainwater infiltrate into soil, replenish groundwater, allow tree roots to
breathe, and reduce flash flooding, but they have not been widely adopted in Australia due to
concerns mainly over reduced structural capabilities and clogging. A research project is being carried
out at USQ aiming at understanding the influence of pore structures features and particle deposition
on clogging resistance and permeability reduction. Clogging is perceived as a major problem for any
type of permeable pavement. Even with vigorous maintenance clogging is common. In the paper,
some common types of clogging are discussed first, followed by the clogging effect on the
performance of porous concrete mainly related to the change of the porosity and the pore structure
properties. Testing methods for measuring porosity and hydraulic conductivity which include both
physical testing and image analysis are reviewed in detail.
1 Introduction
Permeable concrete is a mixture of water, Portland cement, uniformly graded coarse aggregates, and
little or no fine aggregates with some additives (Fig 1). The porous structure allows both water and air
to percolate through the matrix into the subsoil beneath. Because of the interconnected pores,
pervious concrete provides infiltration and evaporation, produces volumetric storage, while providing
the environmentally beneficial leaching of Ca and alkanity, and reducing thermal pollution and
leaching of organic acids and compounds such as phenols, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon and
endocrine disrupting compounds.
Permeable concrete pavements are used for reducing runoff and pollution temperature, and also for
providing load bearing capacity. Moreover, these pavements help increase and purify ground water
storage. However, this operating system has some limitations which restrict its use. Main concern
about permeable concrete pavements is that it is prone to clogging. It has been shown that rapid
decrease in infiltration rate of pervious pavement could occur during the first two years of service due
to the clogging effect. Abbott and Mateos (2) performed in-situ infiltration rate test and showed that
approximately 10% of the initial level exists after 2-3 years of construction or 87% reduction of
permeability happens after 3 years of construction. The clogging developed very rapidly in first few
years, which caused a significant reduction of infiltration rate, for example, 30% to 50% reduction in
country area; 40% to 70% reduction in cities and 60% to 90% reduction in the much polluted areas.
There are three different types of clogging, however, only physical and chemical clogging will be
reviewed in this paper.
2. Clogging
Clogging refers to decrease in permeability due to physical, biological and chemical processes. In the
literature survey conducted for this review, it is seen that 70% of clogging was caused by suspended
solids (SS) and bubbles, 10% by chemical reactions, 15% by microbial growth, and 5% by other
reasons (3), (4) and (5).
As shown in Fig 2, clogging process occurs in three stages. In first stage, particulate matter enters the
surface. In second stage, fine particles flow through substrate with water and coarse particle retain on
surface and form blanket type of layer, which reduces infiltration. In third stage, the blanket-like
deposition layer becomes thick and acts as a barrier to prevent most particles from reaching the
clogging layer. Consequently, the thick and compact clogging layer will sharply reduce the infiltration
rate, which leads to the serious surface ponding.
Studies (14), (15) and (16) have shown that pollutants which are significantly infiltrated in the
permeable pavements are cadmium, lead, copper and zinc. Substantial quantity of dissolved lead and
lesser quantity of zinc are adsorbed on the clogging particles. Copper and cadmium are not
significantly affected by contact with the clogging material (17). Analysis of the materials which are
trapped in pores has been done. It is found (Fig 3) that materials found are fine particles, organic
materials and metals (copper, lead and zinc) sobbed on particles (18, 19).
Figure 3. Heavy metal distribution (19) Figure 4. Size ranges of particles (20)
-7 -4
The diameter of clogging particle ranges from 10 to 10 m. As shown in Figure 4, particles of size
between 0.01 to 10 μm are classified as colloids. Particles at the top range, from 1 to 100 μm, are
referred to as suspended particles. The transition zone from colloid to non-colloids is from 1 to 10 μm.
A term particle refers to solids suspended in water with size of 1 to 100 μm. After measuring the
permeability from 5 different locations having site characteristics like traffic flow, erosion, vegetation
cover, sediments accumulation, maintenance practice, presence of cracking and rainfall, it was
concluded that fine particles (less than 38µ) is an important factor for the reducing the permeability
(20).
2.3.3 Gradation
Permeability depends upon gradation of aggregates. Pervious concrete is a mixture of cement,
aggregates, water with some additives. Coarse aggregates are used instead of fine aggregates to get
good porosity. If gradation of aggregates is not designed properly it can influence porosity as well as
strength of pervious concrete. Very large size of aggregates can make concrete weaker in strength.
On the other hand use of small aggregates can reduce its functional characteristic. Proper gradation
is necessary for pervious concrete. Various studies (12), (22) and (23) used the gradations which
were aimed at the porosity between 15 to 30%. The gradations included #8 (passing of aggregate
from 4.75mm of sieve and retained on 2.36 mm sieve), #4(passing of aggregate through 9.5mm of
sieve and retained on 4.75 mm of sieve) and 3/8”( passing of aggregate through 12.5mm of sieve and
retained on 9.5 mm of sieve). Using single size of aggregates or blending them together with a
percentage of 25, 50 and 75% by their weight can also get the porosity between 15 to 30%. Tan et.al
(24) concluded from their theoretical model and experimental results that by keeping the gradation
narrow and by limiting the number of aggregate sizes, the voids could be larger. This enabled more
clogging materials to be entrapped within the specimens before low permeability was reached.
Figure 5. Device used to clog pervious concrete (25) Figure 6. Falling Head testing setup (13)
Most permeability measurements are based on the theory of Darcy’s Law and the assumption of
laminar flow within the pervious concrete. Coefficient of permeability is expressed as
(1)
Where A1 and A2 are the areas of the cross-section of the sample and the tube, respectively, and l is
the length of the specimen. For a given specimen geometry, h 1 and h2 are initial and final heads, t is
the time taken by water to drop from h1 to h2 and K is the coefficient of permeability. More details can
be found in (23, 26 and 27). The assumption of laminar flow may not be always valid due to the large
pore geometry. When pore size is about 0.6 cm, the flow conditions within specimen moves from
laminar to transition flow. Darcy’s law may not be valid for these cases. Permeability calculated using
Carman-Kozeny equation show fairly good agreement with the measured values. This will be
discussed in detail in a later section.
The functional characteristic of the system was represented using hydraulic conductivity while image
analysis and statistical tools were used to describe the porosity, pore sizes, and their variations. As
indicated in Fig 7, image analysis was conducted to characterize the pore structure of porous
materials (32). Pore area fraction is equivalent to porosity. For Image analysis method 100mm dia
x150mm long specimen was sectioned into 50mm thick slices, 6-18 surfaces were then obtained.
Surfaces were grounded smoothly and painted white. Surfaces were scanned over a clear plastic film
in grey scale model using a flatbed scanner at a resolution of 300dpi. Images without any edge effect
were further processed using an image processing and analysis software. Grey scale images were
cropped into circular images of 570pixels (95mmdia), and from these circular images 400x400pixels
square images are extracted and used for pore structure features. Area of each pore was measured
and summed up and divided by total area of the image which gave the pore area fraction.
where β is the pore connectivity factor, σeff is the effective electric conductivity, σo is the conductivity
of electrolyte and ɸv is the measured porosity.
The pore connectivity factor (β) determined from electrical measurements increased with increasing
porosity and pore sizes. Smaller aggregate sizes (and thus pore sizes) resulted in reduced
connectivities because of the presence of a larger number of apertures or throats in specimens, which
contributed to the reduction of conductivity (33, 34 and 35). Some of the studies had also mentioned
that increasing in porosity did not mean an increase in pore connectivity. When certain aggregate
blends were used, the smaller particles might not be able to fill in the spaces between the larger
particles resulting in higher porosity, but the arrangements of the particles might result in lower pore
connectivity (26).
4.2 Tortuosity
As water flows through permeable concrete, it flows through interconnected path which is tortuous in
nature. It is assumed that all effects arising from pore orientation, connectivity and size variation can
be lumped together as a single tortuosity factor (28).
As indicated in Fig 9, it is the length of the flow path covered by species divided by the straight path.
Therefore, tortuosity is the ratio of the length covered by species to the straight path L of the sample
which is a pure geometrical factor independent of solid and fluid densities. A relationship between
tortuosity and porosity has been found in Eqn. 3 (28):
(3)
where α is the tortuosity and r = ½ for spheres and lies between 0 to 1 for other ellipsoids, and is
the porosity.
As predicted from Eqn. (3), with the increase of porosity, the tortuosity decreases. A general
relationship between porosity and tortuosity might be obtained. The minimum tortuosity is calculated
equal to 0.5 (28, 36).
Permeability increases with increases in pore size, pore connectivity and porosity. However, as
indicated in Fig 10, permeability decreases with increases in tortuosity.
The relationship between permeability, porosity and pore structure features has been developed
based on Kozeny–Carman equation which combines Darcy’s law and pore geometrics as shown in
Eq. 4.
. (4)
{ ⁄}
where pore tortuosity ⁄ , specific surface area of CPP (SSA), and total porosity of CPP (ɸt) ,
shape factor C0 that accounts for the shape of the pores, ranges from 2 to 3 depending on the
assumption of either circular or rectangular pores and for a filter media pore distribution is assumed to
be 2.5.
According to Neithalath (32), intrinsic permeability depends on porosity, pore size distribution, pore
roughness, constrictions of the pore space, the tortuosity and connectivity of the internal pore
channels. Hydraulic conductivity can be related to intrinsic permeability as K=k where ρ = density of
fluid, g = acceleration due to gravity and µ = dynamic viscosity.
(5)
Furthermore, Tan (24) used Konzeny-Carman equation to derivate decreased permeability as a result
of clogging which can be represented as a function of initial permeability, porosity and specific deposit
of clogging material:
k= [ ]
(6)
where k is the permeability of specimen, k 0 is the average initial permeability of specimen, n is the
porosity of the specimen, σ is the specific deposit and it is the ratio of bulk volume of base specimen
and volume of clogging material; α is the empirical constant.
In Eq 6, when clogging materials are able to completely fill up the void spaces, α will be taken as 1.
Theoretically it means that permeability is zero. The value of α indicates the rate of deterioration in
permeability. Higher value of α implies more rapid decrease in permeability.
Another study on the permeability reduction is based on the idealized geometric model of pervious
concrete and on the probability of particle capture to evaluate permeability reduction. Reduction in
pore size because of particle retention as a function of the number of n runs (series of particle and
water addition) could be related to the reduction in flow through the pore channels. Mathematically, it
is stated as in Eq 7.
(7)
where N(ri,aj) is the number of particles of radius aj deposited in a pore radius ri. Q(ri) = flow rate
through a pore radius ri, and p(ri,aj) is the probability of deposition of particles of radius aj in a pore
radius ri and C(aj) is the number of particles of size aj per unit column of water in the pore structure.
Three methods are used to prevent heavy sediment accumulations within the pavement structure by
cleaning debris off from the pavement surface quickly to provide greatest effectiveness of the
pavement. A commonly used method is vacuuming which sucked out clogged particles near the
pavement surface and made the partial surface and interconnected pores open. It should be noted
that only the particles close to the surface can be extracted and the deep portion of pavement could
not be affected. A second method is called pressure washing where the “power head cone nozzle” is
used to concentrate water in a narrow cone (other types of nozzle did not work as well), and loose or
weaken the bonds between the clogged particles and concrete, and push the clogging particles well
inside the core or even to the bottom pavement (28). The third method is called reverse flushing
method where cleaning of porous pavements is done by flushing water from bottom to top by the
water stored beneath the pavement using very low pressure (40). Studies have shown that if
maintenance has not been applied on time or after a clogging phenomenon or after the reduction in
permeability rate to 0.1cm/s there would be no improvement in the infiltration rate with sweeping
followed by vacuuming because of the fully clogging.
6. Conclusion
7. References
1. Yukari, A. , “Development of Pervious Concrete”, University of Technology, Sydney,2009
2. Abbott,C. & Mateos, C., ”In-situ hydraulic performance of a permeable pavement sustainable
urban”, Journal of the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management,2003,
vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 187-90.
3. Dillon, P. , ”Review of International Experience in Injecting Water”,November 1994 pp. 21-5.
4. Henry, M., JP et al., , “Towards a description of particulate fouling: from single particle
deposition to clogging”, Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2012, vol. 185-186, pp. 34-76, item:
23141134
5. Santo,R., Thierry. et al., ”interrelationships betn biological, chemical and physical processes
as an analog to clogging in aquifer storage abd recovery (ASR) wells”, Water Res, 2000 vol.
34, no. 7, pp. 2110-8.
6. Murat, B., “Soil clogging phemomena.”, , Water Sci tech, 1997, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 183-8.
7. Nathalie, R., Richard,V. et al., “Clogging of a limestone fracture by stimulating groundwater
microbes”', Water.Res.,2001 vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 2029-37.
8. Yang, “Study on Clogging Mechanism and Control Methods of Artificial Recharge”,
Proceedings of the International Conference on Challenges in Environmental Science and
Computer Engineering, 2010 pp. 29-32.
9. Hua, GF., Zhu, W. et al., “Clogging pattern in vertical-flow constructed wetlands: Insight from
a laboratory study”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010 vol. 180, no. 1-3, pp. 668-74
10. Kayhanian, M., Anderson, D. et al, “Permeability measurement and scan imaging to assess
clogging of pervious concrete pavements in parking lots”, J Environ Manage, 2012 vol. 95, no.
1, pp. 114-23, item: 22115516
11. Pratt, CJ., Mantle, J. et al., “UK reserach in to the performance of permeable pavement,
reservoir structutes in controllong stormwater discharge quantity and quality”, Water Sci.
Techno,1995 vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 63-9.
12. Deo, O., Samanssoriya,M.et al., ”Permeability Reduction in Pervious Concretes due to
Clogging: Experiments and Modeling”,2010
13. Lundy, Ellis et al., ”Risk prioritisation of stormwater pollutant sources”, Water Res,2012 vol.
46, no. 20, pp. 6589-600, item: 22078253.
14. Kayhanian, M., Fruchtman, BD. et al., “Review of highway runoff characteristics: comparative
analysis and universal implications”, Water Res, 2012 vol. 46, no. 20, pp. 6609-24, item:
22959661
15. Kalmykova,Y., Bjorklund, K. et al., “Partitioning of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,
alkylphenols, bisphenol A and phthalates in landfill leachates and stormwater”, Water Res,
2013 vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1317-28, item: 23295068.
16. Bjorklund, K., “Sources and Fluxes of Organic Contaminants in urban run off”,2011 Chalmers
University of Technology.
17. Legret, M.,Nicollet, M. et al, “Simulation of heavy metal pollution from stromwater infiltration
through a porous pavement with reservoir structute”, Water. Sci. Techno, 1999 ,vol. 39, no. 2,
pp. 119-25.
18. Welker, AL., Gilbert, JK. et al., “Examination of the Material Found in the Pore Spaces of Two
Permeable Pavements”, Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, april 2013
19. Legret, M., Colandini, V. , “Effectsofaporouspavementwithreservoir’', Wat. Sci.Tech, 1999,
vol.39, no. 2, pp. 111-7.
20. Hendrick, A.,”Investigation of clogging processes in unconsolidated aquifers near water
supply wells”, Delft University of Technology, 2007.
21. Yong, CF., Deletic, A., “Factors that Predict Clogging through Porous Pavements.”, 7th
international conference on water sensitive urban design: proceedings of the7th international
conference on water sensitive urban design, Melbourne Cricket ground,2012
22. Neithalath, N., Weiss, J. et al. “Characterizing Enhanced Porosity Concrete using electrical
impedance to predict acoustic and hydraulic performance”, Cement and Concrete Research,
2006, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2074-8
23. Neithalath, N., Weiss, J. et al ,”Predicting the Permeability of Pervious Concrete (Enhanced
Porosity Concrete)”, 2011
24. Tan, S., Fwa, TF. et al, , “Clogging evaluation of permeable bases”, Journal of Transportation
Engineering,2003 vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 309-15
25. Youngmin, J., Grasley, ZC., ”Evaluation and Optimization of Durable Pervious Concrete for
Use in Urban Areas, Texas Transportation Institute”, Texas A&M University System College
Station, Texas 77843-3135, 2008.
26. Low,K., Harz, D. et al, “Statistical Characterization of the Pore Structure of Enhanced Porosity
Concretes.pdf”, concrete technology forum ,2008
27. Schaefer, V.R., Wang, K., et al, “Mix Design Development for Pervious Concrete in Cold
Weather Climates”, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 2006
28. Tong, B., “Clogging_effects_of_portland_cement_pervious_concrete”, Iowa State
University,2011
29. Sumanasooriya, MS., Bentz, DP. et al, “Predicting the Permeability of Pervious Concretes
from Planar Images”
30. Neithalath, N., Weiss, J. et al, “Predicting the Permeability of Pervious Concrete (Enhanced
Porosity Concrete) from Non-Destructive Electrical Measurements”,2008
31. Crouch, LK., Cates, MA. et al 2003, “Measuring the effective air void content of portland
cement pervious pavements”, ASTM International,2003, vol. 25, no. 1
32. Neithalath, N., Sumanasooriya, MS. et al, 'Characterizing pore volume, sizes, and
connectivity in pervious concretes for permeability prediction', Materials Characterization,
2010,vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 802-13
33. Sumanasooriya, MS. & Neithalath, N., 'Pore structure features of pervious concretes
proportioned for desired porosities and their performance prediction', Cement and Concrete
Composites, 2011, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 778-87
34. Narayanan.N, Adam, M. et al, 'Modeling the Influence of Pore Structure on the Acoustic
Absorption of Enhanced Porosity Concrete' 2006
35. Neithalath, N., “Development and characterization of acoustically efficient cementitious
materials”, Purdue University,2004
36. Ahmad, S., Azad, AK. et al , “A study of permeability and tortuosity of concrete”, 30th
Conference on OUR WORLD IN CONCRETE & STRUCTURES,2005
37. Fogler, “Multilayer Deposition of Stable Colloidal Particles during”, Langmuir,1998, vol. 14.
38. Lakshmi .R, ”Particle transport in Soils review of significant processes’', Journal of
Infrastructure system, June 1997
39. Legoff,P., “Flow of Suspensions through Porous Media”, Industrial and engineering chemistry,
May 1970 vol. 62, no. 5
40. Nilesh,A., Scott,S., “Cleaning Porous Pavements Using a Reverse Flush Process”, Journal of
Transportation Engineering, November 2009, vol. 135, pp.832-838