Executive Summary A.Introduction: Comparative Presentation of Total Assets, Liabilities, Equity, Income and Expenses
Executive Summary A.Introduction: Comparative Presentation of Total Assets, Liabilities, Equity, Income and Expenses
Executive Summary A.Introduction: Comparative Presentation of Total Assets, Liabilities, Equity, Income and Expenses
A.INTRODUCTION
The name Sultan Kudarat given to the Province was derived from a Muslim
Ruler, Sultan Muhammad Dipatuan Kudarat who begun to assert his leadership in the
year 1619 and reigned the Sultanate of Maguindanao from 1625 to 1671. He is
considered a national hero, and in his honour the province was named after him.
Mineral reserves are abundant also in the province making it one of the potentials
for investment in Southern Mindanao. Metallic minerals are found mostly in the
mountainous areas of Isulan, Bagumbayan, Sen. Ninoy Aquino, Palimbang and
Columbio. These minerals include copper, gold and silver.
The Province of Sultan Kudarat climbed 14 notches to Top 6 this CY 2016 from
20th place on 2015 for the most competitive provinces by the National Competitiveness
Council. The index measures the province performance on the economic dynamism,
infrastructure, and governance.
B. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Increase (Decrease)
Accounts 2016 2015
Amount %
Increase
Particulars 2016 2015
(Decrease)
Sources:
Tax Revenue 34,914,569.82 31,063,754.01 3,850,815.81
Share from Internal
1,216,785,255.90 1,108,239,836.00 108,545,419.90
Revenue Collections
Service and Business
9,376,272.68 7,678,279.12 1,697,993.56
Income
Share, Grants and
188,085.45 152,808.50 35,276.95
Donations
Other Income 208,849.44 1,433,582.65 (1,224,733.21)
Total 1,261,473,033.29 1,148,568,260.28 112,904,773.01
Application:
Personnel Services 371,994,475.53 344,365,040.73 27,629,434.80
MOOE 597,452,002.68 598,913,729.95 (1,461,727.27)
Financial Expenses 15,550,887.90 17,719,660.65 (2,168,772.75)
Non-Cash Expenses 23,876,241.78 18,957,373.34 4,918,868.44
Total 72,094,068.02 74,856,458.54 28,917,803.22
Deduct: Subsidy to 48,498,218.45 13,318,351.31 35,179,867.14
C.OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS
I. Health Services
II. Education
Provided a counterpart fund for the construction of DepEd MP Building
in the amount of P 1,800,000 at Kenram, Isulan, Sultan Kudarat.
Provided fund support for education and scholarship program for P
8,000,000.
Provided support fund for the Skills Training and Livelihood program
for P10,000,000
V. Governance
Issued with Certification by CIPI as 9001:2008 ISO certified Provincial
Government last November 21,2016.
Funded the purchase of 2 units service vehicles in support to the
National Government Program on Anti-Illegal Drugs Campaign with a
total amount of P2.9M
VI. Civil Works
Funded the concreting of Tibpuan Lebak Road for P3M
Provided financial counterpart for the concreting of Road/FMR along
Columbio-Lutayan Koronadal Road (Blingkong-Palavilla Section)
under the DA-Food Security Program.
Implemented the Asphalting of Dukay-Laguilayan Road for P10M
Implemented the Asphalting of Hwy-Jct Cemetery Road phase 2 funded
under SLRF program for P10M.
D. SCOPE OF AUDIT
A financial and compliance audit was conducted on the accounts and operations
of the Provincial Government of Sultan Kudarat for the calendar year 2016.
The audit consisted of the review and verification of the province’s operating
procedures, interview with concerned officials, and examining on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements to ascertain the
validity of financial transactions and accuracy of financial reports and accounting records
in accordance with generally accepted accounting and auditing standards and adherence
to laws, rules and regulations.
The auditor rendered a qualified opinion on the fairness of the presentation of the
financial statements for the year then ended due to the effects of observation nos. 3, 7, 8,
and 9 on the financial statements. The non-implementation of prior years’
recommendation relative to non-reconciliation of property, plant and equipment and non-
provision of depreciation, affects also the fair presentation of the financial statements.
The following are the deficiencies that constituted drawbacks in the overall
operations requiring immediate remedial measures by management to further improve its
operations.
1. The utilization of the Local Disaster Risk Management Fund could not be verified
and determined the validity and correctness of its charges contrary to the relevant
provisions of Republic Act (RA) 10121 and its Implementing Rules and Regulations
(IRR), thus setting limits in the full attainment of the objectives of the fund.
We recommended the Management to require the LDRRMO submit the Annual LDRRMFIP
and the monthly Report of Sources and Utilization of DRRMF duly certified correct by the
Municipal Accountant on or before the 15th day after the end of each month.
2. The collections by some Collecting Officers were not turned over/ deposited to the
treasurer/authorized depository bank within the period stated on the provisions of
Manual on New Government Accounting System (NGAS) and COA Revised Cash
Examination Manual thereby exposing government funds to risk of loss or
misappropriation.
3. The year-end balances of Real Property Tax (RPT) Receivable and Special Education
Tax (SET) Receivable of P3,081,429.46 and P868,812.50 respectively do not tally
with their corresponding reciprocal accounts Deferred RPT Income and Deferred SET
Income with a balances of P52,524.93 and P868,849.87 respectively, as required
under the Manual on NGAs thus causing doubt on the correctness of these balances in
the financial statements.
4. Various procurements of goods and supplies were not posted in the PhilGEPS website
contrary to the requirement stated under RA 9184 and its IRR-A; thus, resulting to
non-promotion of transparency and efficiency in government procurements.
5. The optimum utilization of the 20% Development Fund in C.Y. 2016 for intended
development projects were not achieved, considering that the
Programs/Activities/Projects under this fund should have been completed and/or
nearing their expected completion contrary to Item No. 5 of DILG-DBM Joint
Circular No. 2011-1 dated April 13,2011.
7. The true cost or booked value of Road Asset Networks in the financial statements
cannot be ascertained due to the non-maintenance of subsidiary ledgers and non-
recognition of depreciation/impairments on the books of accounts. Moreover, the
regular maintenance for the upkeep of the road network system was not properly
charged under COA Circular No. 2015-008 dated November 23, 2015.
Out of the twenty (20) audit recommendations contained in the 2015 Annual Audit
Reports, two (4) were fully implemented, fourteen (14) were partially implemented, and
two (2) were not implemented.