The document compares and contrasts Western and Eastern concepts of self. The Western self is defined analytically and individually, focusing on material aspects and rational thinking. It has historically emphasized the soul/mind and evolved to incorporate social and empirical perspectives. The Eastern self is more pluralistic and intertwined with philosophy and religion, viewing the self through cultural and societal lenses rather than individualism. Culture encompasses both material and non-material aspects that shape perspectives and behaviors across societies.
The document compares and contrasts Western and Eastern concepts of self. The Western self is defined analytically and individually, focusing on material aspects and rational thinking. It has historically emphasized the soul/mind and evolved to incorporate social and empirical perspectives. The Eastern self is more pluralistic and intertwined with philosophy and religion, viewing the self through cultural and societal lenses rather than individualism. Culture encompasses both material and non-material aspects that shape perspectives and behaviors across societies.
The document compares and contrasts Western and Eastern concepts of self. The Western self is defined analytically and individually, focusing on material aspects and rational thinking. It has historically emphasized the soul/mind and evolved to incorporate social and empirical perspectives. The Eastern self is more pluralistic and intertwined with philosophy and religion, viewing the self through cultural and societal lenses rather than individualism. Culture encompasses both material and non-material aspects that shape perspectives and behaviors across societies.
The document compares and contrasts Western and Eastern concepts of self. The Western self is defined analytically and individually, focusing on material aspects and rational thinking. It has historically emphasized the soul/mind and evolved to incorporate social and empirical perspectives. The Eastern self is more pluralistic and intertwined with philosophy and religion, viewing the self through cultural and societal lenses rather than individualism. Culture encompasses both material and non-material aspects that shape perspectives and behaviors across societies.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
THE WESTERN AND EASTERN CONCEPTS OF 3.
Western Self as Individualistic
SELF Western individualism exhibits the “One of the most effective ways to learn about coexistence of favorable and unfavorable oneself is by taking seriously the cultures of conditions inherent in personal freedom others. It forces you to pay attention to those 4. Western Self as Materialistic and details of life which differentiate them from you.” Rationalistic - Edward T. Hall The Western way of thinking is focused on WESTERN CONCEPT OF SELF material “things” and favors a rational- Geertz (van Meijl, 2008) defines the Western empirical approach over magical approach concept of Self as “a bounded, unique, more and superstitious explanations of immaterial or less integrated motivational and cognitive “things”. universe, a dynamic center of awareness, THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE emotion, judgment, and action organized WESTERN CONCEPT OF SELF into a distinctive whole and set contrastively both against other such wholes and against 1. Pre-Christian time until 1850 its social and natural background. There were philosophical and theological attempts to characterize the self through the WESTERN CONCEPT OF SELF IS HOLISTICALLY concepts of soul and mind with emphasis on DEFINED IN TERMS OF THE FOLLOWING conscious experience of the individual, ASPECTS: distinction between physical and mental nature of man (mind-body dualism), and 1. Western Self as Analytic thee causality of human behavior. The western of thinking is analytic-deductive 2. 1850 -1940 with emphasis on the casual link (part-to- whole relationships) The establishment of experiment psychology in mid-nineteenth century led to a change in The whole is understood when emphasis from abstract concepts of soul and differentiated into parts. mind to observable and measurable aspect One must categorize and make distinctions of human faculties. to pursue cause. The concept of self-re-emerged within the 2. Western Self as Monotheistic social interactionist framework in the early 1900s The belief in one Supreme Being coexisting with the universe condenses the 3. 1940-present supernatural and human capabilities into There is a multi-directional and continuous bipolarity of qualities of existence (.eg. development of concept of self: Beautiful/ugly: kind/cruel) And categories of identity and existence. a. Sociological and psychological theories of self encompass all three levels of self, namely inner self, interpersonal self and social self. b. Existentialist and phenomenologist, Sociology both in philosophy and psychology, The scientific study of human life, social engaged in holistic approach integrating groups, while societies and the human world the inner, interpersonal, and social whose subject matter is our own behaviour aspects of self. as social beings in relationship with many c. At present, there is convergence in some other people (Giddens, A. & Sutton, conceptualizations of the self among P.W.,2016). psychologists, anthropologist, CULTURE sociologists, philosophers, and linguist whose studies focus on the actual, Anthropology multivariate and situational contest of the self-employing new frameworks and - Understanding man in its cultural context. methodologies. Sociology EASTERN CONCEPT OF SELF - Digs into understanding the self in reference to Philosophy and religion are twisted together, the behaviour of the society. thus the major Eastern religion such as MATERIAL CULTURE Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, and Taoism are also the common representatives Consist of human technology – all the things of Eastern thought. that people make and use It changes from time to time. The fluidity of Eastern thought is described as pluralistic the culture can be ascribed to mans’ distinct (Garcia ,2013) ability to create, transform, and re-create THE SELF IN FOUR GREAT SYSTEMS OF EASTERN culture itself. THOUGHT The evolution of the material culture can be attributed to the technological advances What is the importance of our culture? that humanity was able to make. Culture sets the cultural standards of our NON – MATERIAL CULTURE community. inclusive of the intangible human creations NORMS – dictates our behavior in the society. that include, beliefs, values, norms, and Culture is made up of all the ideas, beliefs, symbols. behaviors, and products common to defining non- material culture helps in shaping our a group’s way of life (Stolley, 2005). perspective of the society, of ourselves and All human beings have these diverse cultures even of the material world. and it contributes on how we were raised in non-material culture could also manifest in the society and affects the way we see the material culture of people. things. material culture changes overtime, non- material culture may or may not change Anthropology depending on outside factors in the society. Is the study of human race, it’s culture and society, and its physical development? Deals on the origin of humanity and the development of its society and culture.