Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Velasco Vs CA Part 3

    Uploaded by

    Hohenheim
    Petitioner Lumanlan claims he is owed P309,187.76 for constructing 20 houses, but his own evidence conflicts, as in a January 1972 letter he claimed only P216,500 was owed. He admits receiving checks from Mrs. Rhody Laigo totaling P124,855 but they were dishonored upon presentation. In a letter, Lumanlan acknowledges the dishonored checks were intended to pay for 8 houses occupied by named home buyers according to his agreement with Laigo. Laigo acknowledged the dishonored checks in December 1970 and promised to make them good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Velasco Vs CA Part 3

    Uploaded by

    Hohenheim
    15 views2 pages
    Petitioner Lumanlan claims he is owed P309,187.76 for constructing 20 houses, but his own evidence conflicts, as in a January 1972 letter he claimed only P216,500 was owed. He admits receiving checks from Mrs. Rhody Laigo totaling P124,855 but they were dishonored upon presentation. In a letter, Lumanlan acknowledges the dishonored checks were intended to pay for 8 houses occupied by named home buyers according to his agreement with Laigo. Laigo acknowledged the dishonored checks in December 1970 and promised to make them good.

    Original Description:

    Part 3 of the Velasco case

    Original Title

    Velasco vs CA part 3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Petitioner Lumanlan claims he is owed P309,187.76 for constructing 20 houses, but his own evidence conflicts, as in a January 1972 letter he claimed only P216,500 was owed. He admits receiving checks from Mrs. Rhody Laigo totaling P124,855 but they were dishonored upon presentation. In a letter, Lumanlan acknowledges the dishonored checks were intended to pay for 8 houses occupied by named home buyers according to his agreement with Laigo. Laigo acknowledged the dishonored checks in December 1970 and promised to make them good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    15 views2 pages

    Velasco Vs CA Part 3

    Uploaded by

    Hohenheim
    Petitioner Lumanlan claims he is owed P309,187.76 for constructing 20 houses, but his own evidence conflicts, as in a January 1972 letter he claimed only P216,500 was owed. He admits receiving checks from Mrs. Rhody Laigo totaling P124,855 but they were dishonored upon presentation. In a letter, Lumanlan acknowledges the dishonored checks were intended to pay for 8 houses occupied by named home buyers according to his agreement with Laigo. Laigo acknowledged the dishonored checks in December 1970 and promised to make them good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    5.

    Petitioner Lumanlan allegedly constructed 20 houses for the


    home buyers and for which he claims a balance of P309,187.76
    from the home buyers and Laigo. This is reflected in Exhibit "X" of
    petitioners. However, in the letter of Lumanlan to the GSIS on
    January 7, 1972, he was collecting only P216,500.00 (Exh. "W"
    evidence of Lumanlan). Thus, even the evidence of Lumanlan on
    what is due him is conflicting.   chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

    6. Out of his claim, petitioner Lumanlan admits that Mrs. Rhody


    Laigo paid him in several checks totalling P124,855.00 but which
    checks were all dishonored when presented for payment. This is
    Exhibit "X" of petitioners.   chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

    7. Thus, on November 7, 1970, petitioner Lumanlan wrote a letter


    to Laigo Realty Corporation (Exh. "Y", evidence of Lumanlan) which
    reads -

    I wish to inform you that I have received from Mrs. Rhody E. Laigo
    several bank checks which were either dishonored by the bank or
    were cancelled at the request of Mrs. Rhody E. Laigo for reasons of
    insufficient funds. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary chanrobles virtual law library

    The following are the checks:

    DATE SER. NO. AMOUNT BANK


    May 20,1970 646371 P36,000.00 Prudential
    Bank
    June 10,1970 659907 9,000.00 "
    June 30, 1970 646397 20,000.00 "
    July 6, 1970 646398 19,800.00 "
    July 3, 1970 464399 11,250.00 "
    Aug. 7,1970 659913 16,200.00 "
    Aug. 14,1970 659914 12,605.00 "
      Total P124,855.00  
    8. In the same letter, Exh, "Y", Lumanlan admits that the checks of
    Laigo that were dishonored were intended to pay 8 houses occupied
    by home buyers, who caused the construction in accordance with
    the Agreement of Laigo and Lumanlan (Exh. "GG"). The letter of
    Lumanlan also admits -

    This amount was intended to pay for eight (8) houses occupied by
    the following home buyers:

    1
    . Liborio Yalung P18,000.00
    2. Caridad Pascua 13,500.00
    3. Antonio Candelaria 15,300.00
    4. Alberto Rarela 11,800.00
    5. Felomena Gonzales 16,200.00
    6. Estelita Manalang 16,200.00
    7. Rogelio Zabala 16,200.00
    8. Wilhelmina Paras 16,200.00
      P123,400.00
    Refund for expenses  

    in the execution of  

    housing plans for the 1 ,455.00


    above houses. P 124,855.00

    It is significant to note that Exhibits "GG", "W" "X" and "Y" are part
    of the evidence of petitioners.

    9. On December 17, 1970, Laigo acknowledged its dishonored


    checks and promised to make good the same. This is reflected in
    Exhibit "Y-l" of petitioners. The dishonored checks were all
    presented by petitioners and marked Exhibits "II-l" to "II-6".

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy