Effects of One-Dose Varicella Vaccination On Disease Severity in Children During Outbreaks in Seoul, Korea
Effects of One-Dose Varicella Vaccination On Disease Severity in Children During Outbreaks in Seoul, Korea
Effects of One-Dose Varicella Vaccination On Disease Severity in Children During Outbreaks in Seoul, Korea
Original Article
Infectious Diseases,
Effects of One-dose Varicella
Microbiology & Parasitology Vaccination on Disease Severity in
Children during Outbreaks in Seoul,
Korea
Young Hwa Lee ,1,2 Young June Choe ,3 Sung-Il Cho ,1,2 HyeKyung Park ,4
Ji Hwan Bang ,2,5 and Jong-koo Lee 2,6
1
Department of Epidemiology, Seoul National University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, Korea
2
Institute of Infectious Disease, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University,
3
https://jkms.org 1/5
Effectiveness of Varicella Vaccination on Disease Severity
Disclosure To our knowledge, there has been no population-based study to assess the disease severity of
The authors have no potential conflicts of varicella cases after adoption of a universal one-dose varicella vaccination to the NIP. In this
interest to disclose.
study, we aimed to investigate the effect of vaccination on the disease severity of varicella.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Lee YH, Choe YJ, Cho SI,
Lee JK. Formal analysis: Lee YH. Methodology: METHODS
Lee YH, Cho SI. Software: Lee YH. Supervision:
Lee JK. Validation: Lee YH, Park H, Bang JH,
Lee JK. Writing - original draft: Lee YH. Writing
Study population and data collection
- review & editing: Lee YH, Choe YJ, Cho SI, In this study, 1,125 cases from 94 varicella outbreaks reported as part of epidemiologic
Park H, Bang JH, Lee JK. investigation of varicella from January 2015 to December 2017 in the Seoul metropolitan
area were used. Data were provided by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(KCDC). According to the KCDC guidelines, an epidemiologic investigation is required if
varicella outbreaks, including index cases, occur in more than 5% of students in a classroom
within a 3-week period in schools, kindergartens, or day care centers. When a varicella
outbreak is reported, public health centers should conduct an epidemiologic investigation
within 3 days, collecting data from the patient's parent with the help of the school health
teacher. The information includes the name, gender, date of birth, date of diagnosis,
vaccination status, and related clinical symptoms such as rash (the number skin lesions),
fever, headache, and arthralgia. Varicella-related symptoms were determined by the clinical
practitioners through a physical examination of the patients. Disease severity of patients was
assessed by the number of skin lesions as used in a previous study.8-11
Mild cases were defined as those having less than or equal to 50 skin lesions; moderate cases
were defined as those having 51–249 skin lesions; and severe cases were defined as those
having more than or equal to 250 skin lesions. We excluded 117 cases: 3 cases were excluded
because the patient was infected before 12 months of age; 12 cases were excluded for having
varicella within 42 days after the vaccination (breakthrough varicella is infection with
varicella-zoster virus occurring in a vaccinated person more than 42 days after vaccination); 4
were excluded for being vaccinated with 2 doses of vaccine; and 98 cases because the patient
was born before 2004.
Statistical analysis
We used t-test and χ2 to compare the difference in distribution in general characteristics, clinical
symptoms, and disease severity in the vaccinated (breakthrough) and unvaccinated groups.
Binary unconditional logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the differences in
disease severity between the two groups, controlling for the factor of age. All statistical analyses
were performed using SAS software, version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). P < 0.05 was
considered significant, and all tests of statistical significance were two-sided.
Ethics statement
The present study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board
(IRB) of Seoul National University (IRB No. E-1808-062-965). Informed consent was waived
by the board because this was a retrospective study.
RESULTS
Among a total of 1,008 varicella cases in Seoul, Korea, 869 cases (86.2%) were breakthrough
cases and 139 (13.8%) were unvaccinated cases. The mean age for the breakthrough cases
was younger than for the unvaccinated cases (7.72 vs. 8.82 years; P < 0.001). No significant
differences were observed in gender and reporting source distributions between the two
groups. Of these cases, about half were male and 83% to 88% cases were elementary school
students (Table 1).
There was no difference in clinical symptoms between the two groups. Among patients,
rash was the most common symptom in both the breakthrough and unvaccinated groups
(99.5% and 100%) and rash onset was on most of the body (54.1% and 43.7%; P = 0.001).
Fever was the second most common symptom (33.8% and 36.7%; P = 0.510); headache was
the third most common (7.3% and 10.1%; P = 0.245); and arthralgia was a rare symptom
(1.2%, only in the breakthrough group). Disease severity differed between the two groups.
In the breakthrough group, the proportion of cases with moderate-to-severe symptoms
was less than that in the unvaccinated group (14.6% vs. 25.8%; P = 0.002). The risk for
occurrence of moderate-to-severe disease in the breakthrough group was less than roughly
half that of the unvaccinated group (odds ratio [OR], 0.570; 95% confidence interval [CI],
0.365–0.890) (Table 2).
Table 2. Comparison of the epidemiology and disease severity between the breakthrough and unvaccinated cases
Variables Breakthrough Unvaccinated P value OR (95% CI)
cases (n = 869) cases (n = 139)
Clinical symptoms, No. (%)a
Rash 865 (99.5) 139 (100.0) - -
Affected part of rash onset
Face and neck 333 (38.5) 56 (40.3)
Body 468 (54.1) 60 (43.2)
Arms and legs 64 (7.4) 23 (16.5)
Fever 294 (33.8) 51 (36.7) 0.510 0.888 (0.602–1.309)
Headache 63 (7.3) 14 (10.1) 0.245 0.975 (0.517–1.838)
Arthralgiab 10 (1.2) 0 (0.0) - -
Severity, No. (%)
Mild (< 50) 742 (85.4) 104 (74.8) 0.002 0.570 (0.365–0.890)
Moderate to severe (≥ 50) 127 (14.6) 35 (25.8) - -
Moderate (50–249) 114 (89.8) 32 (91.4)
Severe (≥ 250) 13 (10.2) 3 (8.6)
OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.
a
Every clinical symptom was detected and recorded; bContinuity-adjusted χ2 test was used because one of the
cell frequencies was equal to zero.
DISCUSSION
The results of the present study showed that a one-dose vaccination was associated with
the attenuation of disease severity in pediatric varicella cases. We found that the risk of
severe illness was significantly decreased in the breakthrough group compared with the
unvaccinated group (14.6% vs. 25.8%; OR, 0.570). In other words, the vaccine effectiveness
(1–OR) of one-dose of varicella vaccine administered at 12–15 months of age was 43% (95%
CI, 11.0%–63.5%) against moderate-to-severe varicella.
This finding is consistent with results from previous studies reported elsewhere. An OR for
illness that was of a severity more than mild in breakthrough cases than in unvaccinated cases
was noted in Germany (12.5% vs. 68.2%; OR, 0.183),10 the United States (14.3% vs. 52.4%;
OR, 0. 273),9 and China (25.6% vs. 44.8%; OR, 0.446).11
Our data may be contrasted with the results from studies on varicella vaccine effectiveness
that suggest an insufficient immunogenicity of the vaccine in Korea. In a clinical-based study,
the effectiveness of one varicella vaccine product (Suduvax, Green Cross, Seoul, Korea) was
estimated as 54% (CI, 0.10–2.05) in a case-control study, and the seroconversion rate was
76.67% by the classical fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen assay.6 In a population-
based study in Seoul, Korea, the effectiveness of the varicella vaccine was 13% (CI, −17.3–35.6)
and the vaccine-induced immunity rapidly decreased three years after the vaccination,
suggesting waning of the immunity.7
From these findings, we could suggest that a universal one-dose varicella vaccination
program may have limited effectiveness to decrease in the incidence rate of varicella, but have
positive effects in attenuating the disease severity in pediatric varicella cases. Two clinical
studies on the severity of varicella in Korea demonstrated that a milder pattern of rash was
observed in the breakthrough group versus the unvaccinated group12 and that the number of
lesions detected were significantly fewer in the breakthrough group than in the unvaccinated
group.13 From the perspective of a vaccinated patient, milder symptoms by attenuation of
the disease severity are benefit. Contrarily, from the perspective of a population health care
management, patients with breakthrough varicella can also transmit varicella to others
despite that they generally have a lower rate of infectivity than those who are unvaccinated.
Mild symptoms often lead to a failure to isolate patients and lead to outbreaks among those
in close contact such as children in kindergarten or elementary school.
Our study has several limitations. A relatively small number of unvaccinated cases were
identified due to a high level of vaccine coverage, which may cause selection bias. A tendency
for a patient who is infected with varicella in their later years and develops severe disease
could be confounded in our study because the mean age of the unvaccinated group is
significantly higher than that of the breakthrough group (8.82 vs. 7.72 years). To alleviate this
selection bias, however, we used age as a confounder in the logistic model. There could be
also recall bias because the reporter would fill out the epidemiological survey depending on
his or her memory. In addition, in the epidemiological survey form, the questionnaire about
the number of lesions only requests the range of the number with a broad bracket (< 50,
50–249, 250–499, ≥ 500) rather than a concrete number of lesions, which makes it impossible
to precisely distinguish disease severity. The exact impact of a universal one-dose varicella
vaccination on disease severity could not be assessed due to a lack of previous population-
based data on varicella vaccination and its effect on disease severity before adoption of the
universal vaccination. Furthermore, we could not estimate changes in disease severity over
time because there was no data on the annual incidence of varicella cases categorized by
disease severity. Despite these limitations, the present study is the first population-based
study to assess a universal one-dose varicella vaccination on disease severity in Korea after
introduction of the national varicella vaccination program.
In conclusion, our study suggests that employing a universal one-dose varicella vaccination
has had a significant effect on attenuating the disease severity in children. Additional
research is necessary to assess the longitudinal effect of the varicella vaccination program on
changing the epidemiology of varicella in Korea.
REFERENCES
1. Seward JF, Watson BM, Peterson CL, Mascola L, Pelosi JW, Zhang JX, et al. Varicella disease after
introduction of varicella vaccine in the United States, 1995–2000. JAMA 2002;287(5):606-11.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
2. Spackova M, Muehlen M, Siedler A. Complications of varicella after implementation of routine childhood
varicella vaccination in Germany. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;29(9):884-6.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
3. Chang LY, Huang LM, Chang IS, Tsai FY. Epidemiological characteristics of varicella from 2000 to 2008
and the impact of nationwide immunization in Taiwan. BMC Infect Dis 2011;11(1):352.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
4. Choe YJ, Yang JJ, Park SK, Choi EH, Lee HJ. Comparative estimation of coverage between national
immunization program vaccines and non-NIP vaccines in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2013;28(9):1283-8.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
5. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System. http://www.cdc.go.kr/npt. Updated 2018. Accessed
August 10, 2018.
6. Oh SH, Choi EH, Shin SH, Kim YK, Chang JK, Choi KM, et al. Varicella and varicella vaccination in South
Korea. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2014;21(5):762-8.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
7. Lee YH, Choe YJ, Cho SI, Kang CR, Bang JH, Oh MD, et al. Effectiveness of varicella vaccination program in
preventing laboratory-confirmed cases in children in Seoul, Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31(12):1897-901.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
8. Chaves SS, Gargiullo P, Zhang JX, Civen R, Guris D, Mascola L, et al. Loss of vaccine-induced immunity to
varicella over time. N Engl J Med 2007;356(11):1121-9.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
9. Vázquez M, LaRussa PS, Gershon AA, Steinberg SP, Freudigman K, Shapiro ED. The effectiveness of the
varicella vaccine in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2001;344(13):955-60.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
10. Liese JG, Cohen C, Rack A, Pirzer K, Eber S, Blum M, et al. The effectiveness of varicella vaccination in
children in Germany: a case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2013;32(9):998-1004.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
11. Zhang X, Yu Y, Zhang J, Kwan EP, Huang S, Wang Z, et al. One-dose vaccination associated with
attenuated disease severity of adolescent and adult varicella cases in Beijing's Fengtai District. Hum Vaccin
Immunother 2014;10(8):2417-20.
PUBMED | CROSSREF
12. Kim DJ, Park HS, Lee SY, Park KS, Kim TK, Song YH, et al. Epidemiology of varicella in Korea based on
pediatrician's office practice. J Korean Pediatr Soc 1997;40(5):620-8.
13. Kim MR, Park JS, Kim DH, Lee HR, Park CY. A clinical and epidemiologic study on varicella in children.
Pediatr Infect Vaccine 1998;5(1):88-95.
Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.
Alternative Proxies: