Pascal's Triangle and Binomial Coefficients

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Pascal’s Triangle and Binomial Coefficients

Information for the Mathcamp 2017 Qualifying Quiz

1 Pascal’s Triangle
Pascal’s triangle (named for the mathematician Blaise Pascal, 1623–1662) is an infinite triangular
arrangement of numbers, constructed according to the following two rules:
1. The first and last entry in each row is 1;
2. Each other entry is the sum of the two entries directly above it.

Here are the first few rows of Pascal’s triangle:

Row 0 1

Row 1 1 1

Row 2 1 2 1

Row 3 1 3 3 1

Row 4 1 4 6 4 1

Row 5 1 5 10 10 5 1

Row 6 1 6 15 20 15 6 1
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . .

We number the rows of Pascal’s triangle starting at 0. The nth row has n + 1 entries, which we also
number starting at 0. For example, Rule 1 tells us that the 0th and the nth entry of row n are both 1.
We denote the k th entry of the nth row of Pascal’s triangle by nk . For example, referring to the table


above, we can see that      


3 5 6
= 3, = 10, = 15,
1 2 4

We can now rephrase the two rules for constructing Pascal’s triangle as follows: for each n ≥ 0,
   
n n
1. = 1 and = 1.
0 n
     
n n−1 n−1
2. If 0 < k < n, then = + .
k k−1 k

1
2 Binomial Coefficients
And now for something completely different (or so it seems)... What do you get if you multiply out the
polynomial (x + y)n ? Let’s see:

(x + y)0 = 1

(x + y)1 = x + y

(x + y)2 = x2 + 2xy + y2

(x + y)3 = x3 + 3x2 y + 3xy 2 + y3

(x + y)4 = x4 + 4x3 y + 6x2 y 2 + 4xy 3 + y4

(x + y)5 = x5 + 5x4 y + 10x3 y 2 + 10x2 y 3 + 5xy 4 + y 5

Compare the coefficients in these polynomials to the numbers in Pascal’s triangle, and you will
immediately see a pattern:
 
n
= the coefficient of the monomial xn−k y k in (x + y)n ,
k
or, in other words,
n  
X
n n n−k k
(x + y) = x y
k=0
k

This statement
 is called the binomial theorem (because it is about powers of the binomial x + y), and the
n
numbers k are called binomial coefficients. If you’re curious, you can find a proof of the binomial
theorem HERE.

3 A Pattern in Pascal’s Triangle


One of the reasons Pascal’s triangle is interesting to mathematicians is that there are many surprising
patterns that appear in its entries. Here is one of the most well-known such patterns.
Theorem. The sum of the entries in the nth row of Pascal’s triangle is 2n .

We give two proofs of this theorem: one that relies directly on the rules that generate Pascal’s triangle,
and one that uses the binomial theorem.

Proof. Our first proof proceeds by induction on n: we will check that the theorem is true for n = 0, and
then prove that whenever it holds for n = m, it also holds for n = m + 1.
If you have never seen mathematical induction before, you can find a basic explanation HERE or in many
other places around the web.

2
• Base case: n = 0. When n = 0, our theorem says that the sum of the entries in the 0th row of
Pascal’s triangle is 20 = 1. This is true, since there’s only one entry in the 0th row, and it’s equal to
0

0
= 1.

• Inductive step. Suppose that our result holds for n = m. In other words, we assume that
         
m m m m m
+ + + ··· + + = 2m .
0 1 2 m−1 m

Now, let’s try to prove that the same thing is true for n = m + 1, where we’re dealing with the sum
         
m+1 m+1 m+1 m+1 m+1
S= + + + ··· + + .
0 1 2 m m+1

We know that m+1 m m+1 m


   
0
= 1 = , and = 1 = , by Rule 1. We also know that for any k with
m+1
 m
0 m
 m+1 m
0 < k < m + 1, k = k−1 + k , by Rule 2.
Use both of these rules to replace the terms in the sum S, which are entries of the (m + 1)th row of
Pascal’s triangle, by entries of the mth row. We get
               
m m m m m m m m
S= + + + + + ··· + + + .
0 0 1 1 2 m−1 m m

Now notice that in this sum, every entry m



k
appears exactly twice. So we have
         
m m m m m
S =2· + + + ··· + + .
0 1 2 m−1 k

By our assumption, the sum of the entries in the mth row of Pascal’s triangle is 2m , so we have
S = 2 · 2m = 2m+1 . So the sum of the entries in the (m + 1)th row also matches the theorem, and
our induction is complete.

Our second proof is much shorter, because it relies on the power of the binomial theorem. But the
induction proof was also worth seeing, because similar ideas apply even when the binomial theorem does
not work. In fact, the binomial theorem itself can be proven with a similar argument to our first proof!

Proof. By the binomial theorem, we have


         
n n n n n−1 n n−2 2 n n−1 n n
(x + y) = x + x y+ x y + ··· + xy + y .
0 1 2 n−1 n

This is true for any x and y, so in particular it’s true when x = y = 1. Making this substitution, we get
         
n n n n n n
(1 + 1) = + + + ··· + + .
0 1 2 n−1 n

But (1 + 1)n = 2n , so this is exactly the result we wanted.

3
4 More on Binomial Coefficients
There is a lot more to say about binomial coefficients: they appear absolutely everywhere in
mathematics! Most famously, they come up in counting “combinations” of objects:
 
n
= the number of ways to select k out of n objects, when order does not matter.
k

For example, if we have four objects A, B, C, D, here are all the ways we can select two of them:

AB AC AD BC BD CD

There are 6 different possibilities, and indeed 42 = 6.




From this combinatorial interpretation, one can derive a formula for the binomial coefficients:
 
n n!
= .
k k!(n − k)!

If you are curious, you can find more information about this formula and its connection to Pascal’s
triangle in many places around the web (such as Wikipedia).
However, you do not need to know any of this to solve Problem #2 on the Qualifying Quiz.
The information in the first three sections of this handout should suffice.

Good luck and have fun!

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy