CDC 19447 DS1
CDC 19447 DS1
CDC 19447 DS1
□
l\ n
U.S. D E PA R TM EN T OF HEAL TH AN D HUMAN SE RVI CE S
P u b lic H ealth Service
C en ters fo r Disease C o n tro l
N ation al In stitu te fo r O ccu p a tio n a l S a fe ty and H ealth
June 1984
The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-596), states
that the purpose of Congress expressed in the Act is "to assure so far as
possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful
working conditions and to preserve our human resources...by," among other
things, "providing for research in the field of occupational safety and
health...and by developing innovative methods, techniques, and approaches
for dealing with occupational safety and health problems." Later in the
Act, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is
charged with carrying out this policy. One method by which NIOSH responds
to this charge is to publish Technical Guidelines.
Concerned by reports that the precast concrete products industry (SIC 3272)
has an injury incidence rate which is consistently at least twice that of
the national average, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH) began developing this document with the intent of providing
recommendations aimed at reducing worker exposure to hazards.
The document characterizes the industry and describes the operations, tasks
and processes required to manufacture precast concrete products. The
magnitude of the occupational safety problem in the precast concrete
products industry is defined through presentation of injury and illness
incidence rates. In support of the document's systematic approach to the
identification of industry hazards, a detailed analysis of 1,319 accident
case histories was performed. This analysis identifies the tasks, tools,
and equipment that are the most hazardous to the worker.
For example, materials handling tasks, both manual and mechanical, accounted
for 28.0% of the total injuries studied. Tasks associated with welding,
burning and cutting accounted for 4.6% of the total injuries. Some of the
specific tools found to be particularly hazardous to precast concrete
workers include: hoists and cranes, which accounted for 4.4% of the total
injuries and 40% of the fatalities; unpowered handtools, which accounted for
5.7% of the total injuries; and powered handtools, which accounted for 5.8%
of total injuries.
Theodore W. Coons
President
Spillman Company
1701 Moler Road
Columbus, Ohio 43207
Steve Cooper
Consultant
Institute of the Iron Working Industry
1750 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
George Krepel
Manager, Production Programs
Prestressed Concrete Institute
201 North Wells Street
Chicago, Illinois 60606
James H. Pals
Executive Director
Western Institute
3100 South Sheridan
Denver, Colorado 80227
Rodney Smith
President
Smith Cattleguard Company
Route 28
Midland, Virginia 22728
v
CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE...................................................... iii
ABSTRACT.................................................... iv
REVIEW CONSULTANTS ...................... v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................ ix
I. Introduction............................ .................... 1
A. Historical Background .............. 1
B. S c o p e .................................................. 1
II. Description of the Precast Concrete Products
Industry.................................................... 3
A. Plant Census and Worker Population .. ................... 3
B. Process and Task Descriptions .................. 5
III. Identification of the Safety Hazards and
Definition of the P r o b l e m s ................................ 25
A. Injury and Illness Incidence Rates ...................... 25
B. Costs of I n j u r i e s ...................................... 27
C. Identification of the Hazards .................. 28
D. New Employee Injury Rates .............. 55
E. Summary of the Prob l e m .................................. 55
IV. Recommendations for Safe Work Practices
for the Precast Concrete Products Industry ................ 57
A. General Safety Recommendations ........ 57
B. Safe Work Practices for Precasting Processes............ 74
C. Safety Recommendations for Accident
Causal Factor P a t t e r n s .............. 87
V. Safety M a n a g e m e n t ........................ 93
A. Pre-Assessment of Present Program . . . ................. 93
B. Basic Elements of a Safety Program . .................. 94
C. Post-Assessment of Program ............ 105
VI. Recommendations for Research Needs ........ 107
REFERENCES.................................................. 109
APPENDIX A. EXAMPLES OF MANUFACTURED CONCRETE PRODUCTS
WITHIN SIC 3272 ................................ 113
APPENDIX B. REVIEW OF STATE, FEDERAL, AND FOREIGN SAFETY
STANDARDS AND TRADE ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES . . . 117
APPENDIX C. SAMPLE SAFETY AUDIT ............................ 125
APPENDIX D. EXAMPLES OF SAFETY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT FORMS . . . 127
GLOSSARY.................................................... 145
vii
FIGURES
TABLES
viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A. Historical Background
Various forms of cement or cement-lime have been used since ancient times.
The Romans used the product in ashlar work (stone and brick) and as concrete
in building harbors, piers, canals, and water supply and sewerage systems.
The remains of ancient structures reveal that building materials progressed
from relatively simple applications of natural materials to cast concrete,
one of the earliest substitutes for natural stone. Despite the ravages of
time, weather, and warfare, many ancient concrete structures remain to give
testimony to their durability.
Following the Roman period, the use of cement and concrete had a long period
of dormancy until the emergence of studies by the early British civil
engineers in the late 18th century. During the 19th century, after the
successful development of the Erie Canal under Governor DeWitt Clinton of
New York, engineering projects increased the need for cement and concrete.
New sources and techniques were developed, transportation improved,
industrial growth expanded, and concern for public health emerged.
Transportation requirements created a demand for railways, highways, storm
drainage, and bridges; buildings required structural and architectural
elements; and improvements in public health called for sewerage, water
storage, and water distribution systems.
B. Scope
2
CHAPTER II
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
3
TABLE II-l
NUMBER OF PLANTS AND EMPLOYEES PRODUCING
PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS, 1980
(SIC 3272)
Number of
Plants 2,004 951 610 236 106 17 6 3,930*
Number of
Employees 7,548 11,113 17,924 14,910 14,341 5,088 11,125 82,049
% of
Employees 9.2 13.5 21.8 18.2 17.5 6.2 13.6 100.0
*Thirty-three additional plants did not report the number of their employees;
the actual total number of plants, therefore, is 3,963.
Compiled from Summary of Dun & Bradstreet Data in NIOSH Industrial Profile,
1980 [1].
TABLE I1-2
SUMMARY OF PLANT CENSUSES (SIC 3272)
Total Number
of Plants 3,916 3,963 —
Number of Plants
with 20 or More
Employees 862 975
Number of Plants
in State of Pa. — 163 165
Number of
Employees in
State of Pa. — 2,400 2,553
Compiled from the Summary of Dun & Bradstreet Data in NIOSH Industrial
Profile, 1980 [1], 1979 Pennsylvania Industrial Directory [2], and 1977
Census of Manufacturers [3],
4
Information supplied by trade associations also verifies the plant census
figures in the NIOSH profile. The American Concrete Pipe Association (ACPA)
[4], the Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) [5] and the National Precast
Concrete Association (NPCA) [6] estimations of worker population corroborate
the NIOSH profile figures. Further, the trade associations estimate that
the precast concrete industry is comprised of approximately 62,500
production workers. This equates well with the aforementioned NIOSH profile
total population of 82,049 workers, and the Department of Commerce Census
estimation that approximately 77% (or 63,178) of the total worker population
in the industry are production workers. Table II-3 presents these trade
association estimates.
For the purposes of this study, the NIOSH Industrial Profile data was used
since it was the latest compilation of data on the industry.
TABLE I1-3
TRADE ASSOCIATION ESTIMATES OF NUMBER OF
PLANTS AND PRODUCTION EMPLOYEES, 1980
(SIC 3272)
Architectural and
Structural Products** 400 18,500
Miscellaneous Precast
Concrete Products*** 3,100 26,000
Forms or molds used for the casting of precast concrete products us
ually are made of steel or wood. However, they may be constructed of
any material that remains stable during casting and is able to withstand
the abuse of preparation, installation of steel reinforcement, oiling,
curing, stripping, and reuse. Wood is commonly used for the
construction of forms expected to have a limited use; that is, forms
built for the casting of fairly unique concrete products. Concrete is
sometimes used as a form because it can be cast into intricate shapes.
With a dense, smooth surface finish and the application of form release
agents, concrete is an excellent form material for products requiring
smooth or curvilinear surfaces. Styrofoam, fiber glass, rubber matting,
and various paperboards are also occasionally used to make forms or form
liners for special surface effects. Because many of the products
manufactured in the industry are produced repetitively, steel forms are
common. Such forms are usually made to design specification by other
departments or are purchased as standard equipment from other form
manufacturers. Occasionally, it is necessary to modify or customize
steel forms; that is, holes, notches, and sections may be burned out or
fillets, boxouts, and seats may be welded in place as needed. Large
forms may be equipped with access ladders, stairways, work platforms,
conveyor connections for receiving concrete, and external vibrators for
consolidation.
Steel forms are hammered, vibrated, modified, and moved, creating dents,
holes, and misalignments that require periodic repair and mainten
ance. In addition to welding shops, many plants have portable welding
equipment for repair and modification of forms too large and unwieldy to
move. Welds and patches are occasionally required to fill in depressed
spots; chipping and grinding operations are used to smooth rough areas.
The form surface against which the concrete will be cast must be clean
and smooth (unless specifically designed otherwise). Forms are cleaned
for reuse by chipping, wire brushing, scraping, scrubbing with water,
sanding, and/or air blowing.
Form assembly follows repair and cleaning. Large forms are moved to the
casting station by overhead hoists or cranes, or by lift truck. Many
products have interior and exterior forms. Often, the interior form is
placed and fixed to a cleaned steel plate, or pallet ring that forms the
bottom of the product. Exterior forms are then locked into place with
various fittings (makeup bolts, tack welding) that both fix its position
and maintain the required dimension between the interior and exterior
form.
6
for driving nails and tacking chamfer strips in wood forms. Sledge
hammers, crowbars, and prybars are used in the alignment of forms as
well as during the placement and removal of bulkheads.
The tasks and equipment used during the construction of the forms are
typical to wood, Styrofoam, or fiber glass assembly/manufacturing pro
cesses. Most companies have carpenters' shops or areas equipped with
hand and power tools for form construction. Larger companies usually
have full-time personnel to use this equipment while smaller companies
usually assign workers the task of making the form as part of their
other routine responsibilities (casting, oiling, mixing, etc.).
2. Oiling
The form surface is coated with a release agent to keep the fresh
concrete from bonding to the form. Form release agents usually have a
kerosene or paraffin base and are applied to the form by swabbing or
spraying before the reinforcing steel is placed.
3. Reinforcing
7
a. Plant Fabricated Steel
b. Prefabricated Steel
8
d. Prestressing Steel Strand
The steel wire strands are laid in the stressing bed (a long form
up to several hundred feet in length with the cross section of the
desired shape) and fixed at the ends (abutments). The stressing
bed is the mold for several precast units along its length. For
example, if 50-foot-long "double tees" are desired and a
610-foot-long stressing bed is used, 12 such units can be produced
in one bed, each separated by a bulkhead. Some beds are designed
as selfstressing forms, eliminating the need for end abutments.
Once the strands are in place they are then stressed. This
operation is the tensioning (stretching) of wire strands previously
positioned in the form. Stressing includes strand vise placement,
jacking, tensioning, harping, and detensioning. The stressing
operation can be done by single strand jacking or multiple strand
jacking where all the strands are tensioned at the same time. The
strands to be stressed (usually 1/2-inch, seven-wire strand [7],
tensioned to approximately 200,000 pounds per square inch (psi) or
a 30,000 pound load) are anchored at one end of the bed with a
strand vise.
The strand vise barrel has a truncated conical hole along its
longitudinal axis that holds the three jaws of a chuck. The chuck
is serrated on the inside surface and conical in shape outside.
The jaws permit free movement of the strand in one direction. In
the other direction, they grip the strand and wedge themselves into
the conical hole in the barrel of the strand vise. A strand vise
is placed over each length of strand at the anchor end abutment,
which fixes it in place. At the jacking abutment, two strand vises
are placed on the strand in opposing directions. One is seated
against the end abutment and allows the strand to be pulled through
as the jack tensions the strand. This strand vise also holds and
anchors the tensioned steel to the abutment. The other strand vise
provides a grip for the jack. Figure II-l shows a rectangular
prestressed beam form with strands stressed and reinforcement in
place.
The steel strand may run straight through the bed and may be
stressed in this position. Alternatively, the strands may be
depressed within the form for each member along the bed to create
9
an upward force that improves structural efficiency [7]. This
technique is called draping or harping.
The term "draping" describes the profile of the steel strand, which
is "draped" from its high point near the ends of each precast
member to the lowpoint at the midspan of each member. Strands can
either be depressed or pulled up. Tine strands are passed through
and over pin and roller fixtures that minimize friction at the
points of change in the steel strand profile. Figure II-2 shows
the strands depressed at the midpoint of a member, thus creating
the appearance of strings on a harp. Some designs may require
other holddown locations for each member.
After the concrete is cast and has gained the specified strength (us
ually 3,500 psi or more [7]), the strand tension is released, or deten-
sioned. In some cases, strands are individually cut by torch; however,
with hydraulic jacks, the tension is gradually released from the header.
10
FIGURE II-2. A "SINGLE TEE" SLAB WITH THE STRANDS HELD DOWN AT THE MIDPOINT
TO "HARP" THE PRETENSIONED STEEL
4. Concrete Mixing
The two most common types of mixers used in the industry are drum mixers
and pan mixers. A drum mixer is a rotating cylinder in which sta
tionary paddles, mounted along the cylinder, mix the concrete (truck
11
mixers are of the drum type, inclined from the horizontal). The pan
mixer consists of a shorter cylinder than the drum mixer and is
vertically oriented; paddles are mounted vertically and rotate to mix
the concrete in the stationarycylinder. The mixer is usually
positioned 10-15 feet above the adjacentworking surface to allow
gravity discharge of the mixed concrete into buckets, trucks, or other
means of conveyance to the casting area. Access for cleaning,
maintenance, or concrete quality control is provided by ladder or steps
to a working platform that will partially or totally encircle the
mixer. Figure II-3 depicts a concrete batching, mixing, discharge, and
transport system.
At the end of each shift or after mixing is completed for the day, the
mixers are cleaned. In addition to daily cleaning andflushing of
concrete mixers, it may be necessary to hammer or chip away built-up en
crustations of concrete on a periodic basis. Mixers also require
maintenance, paddle replacement, and repair. All of these tasks may
require workers to enter the mixers.
As parts of the form are filled with concrete, the truck moves along the
form, placing concrete to the desired level. The process continues,
12
FIGURE II-3. CONCRETE BATCHING, MIXING, DISCHARGE, AND
TRANSPORT SYSTEM
13
using additional ready-mix trucks with loads of concrete, to completely
cast the products being made. During casting, workers will be engaged
in a series of continuous tasks directed at filling the form with
concrete. When a ready-mix truck is used, workers will be working
adjacent to and along with the movement of the delivery truck. Access
(steps or ramps) to low forms (1-3 feet high) is usually limited or
nonexistent. Employees will frequently be working and moving among
multiple form tiedowns, spacers, and spreaders as well as walking on the
reinforcing mats while filling and vibrating the forms. When it is not
possible for a truck to deposit concrete directly into the form,
wheelbarrows, hoisted concrete buckets, or concrete delivery vehicles
are used. Workers may push wheelbarrows along walkways, planks, or
ramps to fill the form with concrete.
14
stepping up and jumping down; it is uncommon for steps or ramps to be
provided•
Most concrete pipe is cast with a relatively dry, low-slump mix that is
mechanically placed and consolidated in the form. Two of the four
mechanical methods use both inner and outer forms, which vibrate with
either tampers or vibrators while the dry-mixed concrete is cast into
the annular space between them. In the tamping method, compaction is
performed directly by vertically operated tampers. In the dry cast
method, consolidation is done by external vibration of the inner or
outer form. The other two mechanical methods use only the outer form
and either spin the pipe horizontally while centrifugal forces
distribute the concrete delivered by conveyor, or spin a mandrel-like
packerhead that is drawn up inside the pipe as concrete is cast from
above, compacting as it goes. These four mechanical, dry-type mix
methods of casting pipe are shown in Figure II--5.
Figure II-6 shows one type of vertical packerhead operation used in the
manufacture of pipe. Metal pipe forms are placed by forklift or man
ual or automated cranes onto openings in a circular casting floor. The
floor rotates (at slow speeds) to position the form in the operational
packerhead area. An employee on an elevated platform controls the
packerhead spinning speeds, the up-and-down motion of the packerhead,
and the flow of concrete into the form. When the casting is complete,
the floor rotates an empty form into place and the forklift removes the
cast pipe and mold to a curing area.
15
CONVEYOR
DRIVE MECHANISM
FOR DISCHARGE CHUTE
ROTATING DISCHARGE
CHUTE
FORM
SCAFFOLD
16
Packerhead
Tamp
Centrifugal
Dry Cast
FIGURE II-5. FOUR MECHANICAL METHODS OF CASTING CONCRETE PIPE [8]
Copyright by the American Concrete Pipe Association.
Reprinted by the Department of Health and Human Services with
permission. Further reproduction without permission of
copyright holder prohibited.
FIGURE II-6. SEMIAUTOMATIC VERTICAL PACKERHEAD PIPE CASTING SYSTEM
per second (rps) while vibrating and depositing concrete, and at speeds
up to 10-12 rps while "throwing" the concrete and compressing it against
the rotating form. In the centrifugal process, excess water is removed,
further lowering the water/cement ratio of the concrete.
6. Finishing
Additional treatment of the formed surface may take place after the form
has been removed and the product has cured. This is particularly true
for architectural panels, when the surface texture is important.
Techniques such as grinding, bush hammering, sand blasting, water
washing of retarded surfaces, or acid etching are used to produce a
variety of desired architectural effects. Bush hammering is the
roughening of the hardened concrete surface with a vibrating hammer, the
head of which is serrated with a series of pointed teeth. Sand blasting
is the high-pressure spraying of sand onto the exterior concrete surface
to clean or smooth it. Water washing (up to 300 psi) is the flushing of
cement paste that purposely has been retarded in setting to expose the
surface of the aggregate. Acid etching serves a similar purpose, but
does not expose as much of the aggregate. This procedure involves the
mixing, dilution, and application of muriatic acid, an industrial grade
of hydrochloric acid.
7. Curing
ft
(
20
I
The curing of many larger precast products is accelerated by radiant
heat, steam, hot water, or hot oil. In some instances, the cast product
is exposed to live, low-pressure steam within an insulated kiln or steam
shed. Pipe or other products to be steam or heat cured will usually be
transferred from the casting area to the heated shed by conveyor, fork-
lift, hoist, or, in some instances, by rolling. The products remain in
the steam shed for 2-8 hours (frequently overnight) before being removed
and the form stripped. In some instances, the form is stripped before
the product is steam cured. Large pipe is frequently enclosed (in the
place where it was cast) by canvas, plastic, or other material into
which steam or warm, moist air is introduced. Steam and hot water for
accelerated curing procedures are usually generated at the plant by a
low-pressure boiler and piped to designated locations prior to release
into the curing shed. Occasionally, a chemical curing compound is
sprayed on the finished surface of the concrete.
8. Form Stripping
Flat products are removed from the mold by means of a vacuum lifter, or
by lifting the product from the mold utilizing "lifting eyes" previous
ly inserted in the product. Girders, beams, or other large, vertical
products may have side forms to be removed before the product is freed
from the forms. Bolts and other connectors are removed, and the side
form panels pulled away or dropped to the ground.
Some concrete products may require dismantling of the forms for re
moval either because the form material will not be used again or because
this is the only practical means of removing the completed product.
Depending on the size and shape of the form, workers may perform the
dismantling from the plant floor, from the elevated casting beds, from
rolling ladder/scaffolds, or from the form itself. Workers will usually
be performing their tasks on and among the equipment and material used
during the form stripping process. Prybars, crowbars, sledge hammers,
21
and wrenches will be used to pull nails and remove the spreaders,
stiffeners, and bulkhead-retaining tie rods. Sledges and prybars will
be used to force the separation of bulkheads from the product and/or
other form structures. This frequently involves workers pushing or
pulling on the bar until the adherence forces release, sometimes
suddenly.
9. Material/Product Storage
Product storage methods vary considerably with the size and shape of the
product. Small miscellaneous products are frequently produced in a
variety of shapes at the same plant. Yard areas are usually limited,
necessitating multilayered stacking of the pieces. Layers may be
separated by cribbing and/or pallets to both protect the finished
surface and to increase the load-bearing surface stability. Larger and
heavier shapes, such as vaults and manholes, are frequently stacked with
cribbing layers between them to provide access for forklifts or rigging
material. Pipes and cylindrical products arestored in the manner
described for rolls and reels. Pipes of the same size are stored in the
same stack. Again, care must be taken to allow adequate access for
materials handling equipment and to prevent stack shifting. Large pipes
are usually stored vertically.
22
tie-wire, wood scrap, nails, chamfer strip, rejected hardware, concrete,
forms, and the remainder of unused raw materials can be found in plants
in this industry. Many plants have a "bone yard" in which such
discarded material is kept, pending burial or removal.
Since precast concrete products and their components are heavy by their
nature, the industry makes use of a variety of mechanical devices to
assist in handling and movement operations.
For the most part, the types and varieties of hoists and cranes
that are used in precasting operations do not differ significantly
from those used in other industries. However, because of the
weight of the material and products being moved, crane and hoist
usage may be more prevalent.
23
rigging responsibilities. Products may be manufactured with
integral picking eyes that facilitate proper rigging and load
balance. In other instances, the rigging and hoisting will be
performed on material necessitating new or single instance handling
procedures. Load weights and balance points must be identified by
the workers as part of the rigging operation.
b. Forklifts
24
CHAPTER III
IDENTIFICATION OF THE SAFETY HAZARDS
AND DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEMS
This chapter is divided into two major areas of emphasis: the development
and presentation of data pertaining to injury incidence rates for the
precast concrete products industry (SIC 3272), and the identification of
those tasks performed that are hazardous to the worker. Additionally, an
estimation of the cost of injuries sustained by workers in the precast
concrete products industry is presented.
TABLE III-l
OCCUPATIONAL INJURY AND ILLNESS INCIDENCE RATES FOR THE
PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS INDUSTRY (SIC 3272)
25
TABLE III-2
OCCUPATIONAL INJURY AND ILLNESS INCIDENCE RATES FOR
ALL DURABLE GOODS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
Average
Annual Total Case Lost Nonfatal Cases Lost Actual
Employment Incidence No. of Workday Without Lost Workday Lost
Year (1,000) Rate* Cases** Cases* Workdays* Rate*** Workdays****
The incidence rates for precast concrete products are among the highest
rates within the manufacturing sector (top 3%). A representative selection
of the manufacturing industries is shown in Table III-3.
Table III-3 demonstrates that the occupational incidence rate per 100
employees in the precast concrete products industry was higher than those
for concrete block and brick manufacturers and ready-mixed concrete, which
exhibited incidence rates of 15.8 and 13.7, respectively. The incidence
rate for concrete products was also substantially higher than for blast
furnaces and steel mills (9.5), which is a heavy industry involving
additional injury potentials attendant to the handling of molten metal.
26
TABLE III-3
EXAMPLES OF OCCUPATIONAL INJURY AND ILLNESS INCIDENCE RATES
FOR SELECTED MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES, 1980
B. Costs of Injuries
27
be made, however, which reveal the magnitude of the problem. Best available
workers' compensation data from 46 States [13-21] reported a total of 9,335
medical and indemnity compensation cases during 1977 (the most current year
reporting reasonably complete data) with actual paid claims totaling
$30,855,454 or an average of about $3,305 per case. This averages about
$595! per production worker in 1977 dollars. Although the estimates of
direct costs of worker injuries are not precise, they do reflect the
magnitude of the problem.
Estimates derived from National Safety Council [22] data indicate that full
costs of work-related accidents are more than 3.4 times the direct wage loss
and medical expense costs. Since the indemnity payments are normally less
than wage loss, the real accident costs for the precast concrete products
industry are estimated to exceed $105 million per year (3.4 x $30.9
million). In addition to medical and indemnity expenses, estimates of the
real cost of accidents include:
The preceding section of this chapter defined the magnitude of the safety
problem in the precast concrete products industry. The next step in a
systematic approach to effectively lowering worker accident/injury exposure
is the identification of how workers are injured while performing the tasks
required to produce precast concrete products.
■
’■Production workers comprise about 77% of the total work force for this
industry [3]. Seventy-seven percent of the reported 1977 employment figure
of 67,300 (Table III-l) is 51,821 production workers. Compensation losses
of $30,855,454 divided by 51,821 production workers yields about $595 per
production worker.
28
is compiled and reported by the BLS Supplementary Data System (SDS) [23,
24]. The SDS is intended to alert users to patterns and relationships
of injury causal factors. The information is entered into each of four
major groupings:
o Source of injury
o Type of accident
o Nature of injury
o Part of body affected.
2. Accident/Injury Analysis
The SDS data are limited when used in the analysis of a specific
industry because the "source of injury" category contains subcategories
which do not apply to the industry under study, and does not contain
subcategories which are related to industry-specific tools and
equipment. Further, the "source of injury" reported is the object most
responsible for causing the injury. Thus, if a worker falls from a
ladder and fractures his leg on the plant floor, the "source of injury"
is the floor, which probably contributed little to the actual cause of
the accident.
Despite the constraints, the SDS data reported by the precast concrete
industry for 1976 - 1979, which included 15,208 injuries, were analyzed
to identify specific industry hazards. The analysis included 37
categories that identified injury sources within precasting operations.
No. of No. of
Accidents (%) Acc ident s (%)
TYPE OF ACCIDENT NATURE OF INJURY
Struck By or Against 5,187 (34.1) Amputation 115 (0.8)
Falls 2,210 (14.5) Burns (Heat) 297 (1.9)
Caught In or Between 1,523 (10.0) Burns (Chemical) 175 (1.1)
Rubbed/Abraded Against 767 (5.0) Contusions, Bruises 2,403 (15.8)
Bodily Reaction 762 (5.0) Cuts, Lacerations 2,133 (14.0)
Overexertion 3,220 (21.2) Fractures 1,647 (10.9)
Contact w/Temp. Extremes 295 (1.9) Scratches, Abrasions 893 (5.9)
Contact w/Caustics 599 (4.0) Sprains, Strains 4,724 (31.1)
Motor Vehicle Accident 162 (1.1) All Other Occ. Diseases 1,376 (9.0)
All Other Classifiable 118 (0.8) All Other Classifiable 212 (1.4)
Nonelassifiable 365 (2.4) Nonelassifiable 1,233 (8.1)
Bodily Motion (no 726 Bodily reaction 689 Sprain, strain 601 Back 283
lifting, pushing, (slips, loss of balance, Ankle 157
pulling) reaching, bending) Knee 99
Chemicals (acids, 307 Contact with caustics 246 Chemical burns 127 Eye 88
alkalis, moist Dermatitis 56 Multiple parts 52
concrete) Systemic poisoning 38 Body System 41
Hand 31
Concrete aggregate 842 Overexertion 203 Sprain, strain 225 Eye 178
(sand, cement, Struck by falling obj. 152 Abrasion 136 Back 151
gravel) Rubbed or abraded by 115 Contusion 131
foreign material
Containers (bags, 714 Overexertion 444 Sprain, strain 410 Back 310
boxes, bundles, Contusion 93 Trunk 102
reels, rolls) Finger 72
Hand tools, non- 345 Struck by 126 Cut, laceration 113 Finger 87
powered (blow Overexertion 87 Sprain, strain 91 Back 41
torches, chisels, Contusion 57 Hand 40
ropes and chains,
saws, screwdrivers)
Lumber and other 589 Overexertion 221 Sprain, strain 219 Back 154
wood items Struck by falling 125 Contusion 114 Finger 87
object Fracture 92 Trunk 85
Struck by 75
Machinery (cage 720 Caught in, under, or 302 Cut, laceration 197 Finger 287
roller, concrete between Contusion 131 Hand 97
extruding, concrete Overexertion 90 Fracture 117
saw, pipe spinning, Struck against moving 75 Sprain, strain 100
press brake, rebar object
bending, rebar
cutting)
Nails 146 Struck against sta 113 Puncture 137 Foot(not toes) 106
tionary object Hand 15
Particles (uniden- 323 Rubbed or abraded by 256 Abrasion 271 Eye 314
tified) foreign material
Welding machines 167 Contact with radiation 127 Welder flash 110 Eye 156
(electric) Radiation effects 37
Working/walking 1,797 Fall to work surface 540 Sprain, strain 776 Back 329
surfaces Fall to level below 307 Contusion 307 Ankle 284
Fall from vehicles 299 Fracture 273 Trunk 230
w Knee 185
Compiledfrom U.S. Department of Labor Supplementary Data System (SDS) unpublished accident andinjury
data for 1976 - 1979 [24].
recent years (1977 to 1981). Of the 2,250 accident/injury reports,
1,319 (about 59%) were included in the analysis. Of these 1,319
injuries, 34 resulted in a fatality. Those reports not included in the
analysis primarily contained injury information, and were found to
contain insufficient data to determine accident causal factors.
The first step in the analysis was the identification of the specific
task, tool, type of material, piece of equipment, or plant area most
closely associated with the accident in each case. This procedure made
possible more precise and industry-specific classification than the
SDS "Source of Injury" category could provide. Then, a causal factor
was identified in each case (e.g. improper tool use, lack of personal
protective equipment, lack of adequate guarding, improper materials
handling procedures). The task/tool/equipment factors and accident
causal factors were then cross-indexed to allow the identification of
problem areas.
Section a covers general accident factors; i.e., tasks, tools and items
of equipment that are not specific to the precast industry. Section b
presents factors that are specific to precasting processes. Section c
describes accident causal factor patterns, groups of factors which may
encompass several task/tool/equipment categories. Essentially, the
organization of sections a, b, and £ is followed in the presentation of
the recommendations in Chapter IV.
38
TABLE III-6
COMPARISON OF SDS ACCIDENT/INJURY CLASSIFICATION WITH
THE ANALYSIS OF ACCIDENT CAUSAL FACTORS FOR THE
PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
No. of No. of
Type of Accident Accidents (%)* Accidents (%)**
39
fingers when the load was set down with inadequate
clearance.
40
(b) Mechanical (8.1%)
41
the accidents occurring to coworkers. Table III-5
indicates that workers suffered injuries to the
fingers and feet by being caught in or struck by the
forklift.
42
areas: guarding, tool usage, and lack of eye protection.
43
load from too great a distance (see Table III-5, "Shovel"
and "Concrete aggregate").
44
worker was "walking" in an unspecified section of the
plant. Almost 29% of these injuries were nail punctures
of the foot. More than 45% were falls to the
working/walking surface caused by slipping on wet,
slippery surfaces or tripping on material, usually pieces
of concrete debris, rebar, welding stubs, or leads.
45
(6) Materials Storage (4.5%)
46
components. Consequently, the accident/causal factors
associated with form assembly primarily fall into the
categories that typify physical procedures; e.g., the
worker's position relative to the task, and gripping and
handling form components. Many of the injuries that
occurred in form assembly tasks were sprains and strains
of the back, and injuries to the fingers. In two
instances, workers were struck by form sections being
turned by overhead hoists. Inadequate chocking and
bracing of form sections during assembly or stripping
contributed to many of the more serious injuries. In the
instances when the form component adhered to the cured
concrete, workers were struck by or caught beneath a
portion of the form that was suddenly released and fell.
Additional information concerning injuries resulting from
form work can be found in Table III-5, "Forms" and
"Lumber".
47
causal patterns from other forming and casting
operations. Additional injury information is contained
in Table III-5, "Reinforcement".
48
(3) Oiling
49
were more task or tool specific (concrete delivery, pipe
machine, scaffolds), yet still operationally part of the
overall casting procedure, were included in the more
specific category.
(7) Curing
50
transport products on or off of the plant premises. More
than 82% of these accidents occurred while workers were
attempting to get onto or off of the vehicle bed
(access). The beds of these vehicles are typically 3 or
more feet above the ground. Adequate foot and hand holds
are seldom provided in places which would assist workers
getting onto or offof the vehicles. Slippery or
cluttered surfaces contributed to these accidents,
resulting in all types of injuries (lacerations,
fractures, contusions) to all parts of the body.
Additionally, the SDS data (Table III-5) indicate that 1%
of the injuries were sustained by occupants of motor
vehicles involved in accidents. The SDS data also
indicate that 2% of the injuries were attributed to
workers falling off vehicles (see Table III-5,
"Working/walking Surfaces").
The method used to analyze the accident case histories allowed the
identification of significant accident patterns by the grouping of
related accident causal factors. For example, injuries attributed
to wet, icy, or slippery surfaces; tripping; or puncture; are
51
discussed below under the general heading "Working/Walking
Surfaces." These accident patterns indicate hazardous activities
or conditions that encompass various tasks, industrial processes,
tools, and items of equipment utilized in the precast concrete
products industry. The arrangement of these patterns by
percentage, in order from highest to lowest, is not intended to
suggest that one accident pattern represents greater hazard to
workers than another pattern, since data clarifying worker exposure
are not available.
There are two major accident types that occur as the result of
improper manual materials handling procedures: overexertion
accidents that cause sprains and strains of the back and
shoulders, and materials movement accidents (dropped load,
load placed on fingers) that usually result in lacerations,
contusions, and fractures of fingers or toes. There is very
little task specificity in manual materials handling
accidents. Workers are required to lift and handle materials
and tools throughout all precasting operations. They appear
to be injured in proportion to the expected amount of manual
materials handling likely to be used in any given task.
52
with some tasks or tools, workers are exposed to hazards
likely to result in injuries. For example, cutting torch
tasks cause metal particles to fly through the air, increasing
the probability of eye injuries; or, mixing and placement of
concrete may result in material splashes that cause eye
injuries; or, loads may fall or be dropped onto workers feet
resulting in toe injuries.
53
workers climbing onto or down from truck beds. Again, the
injuries usually were caused byfalls to below.
The data indicate that most of the accidents that were caused
by inadequate chocking, bracing, or cribbing occurred to
employees engaged in tasks or activities related to partially
assembled or dismantled forms. Form structures may adhere to
concrete surfaces and then release suddenly. In some
instances, employees were working (chipping, cleaning,
welding, rigging) on or from forms that were braced or cribbed
inadequately or not at all. Almost 12% of the fatal accidents
in this industry occurred because of inadequate chocking or
bracing.
54
Employees reaching or climbing into concrete mixing equipment
(pan mixers, drum mixers, ready-mix trucks) without
controlling the energy source accounted for three of the six
fatal accidents.
Analysis of the 1,319 accident case histories shows that 513 (54%) of the
950 reports that included length of employment information involved workers
employed less than 1 year. In fact, 408 (43%) of the injuries were actually
sustained by workers employed for less than 6 months.
Accident and injury statistics for 1980 indicate that the injury and illness
incidence rate for the precast concrete products industry (SIC 3272) was 2.5
times the rate for all private sector industries. Not only does the precast
concrete products industry have the problem of high injury incidence rates
relative to all private sector industries, but within the manufacturing
sector where there are similar tasks and operations, only 8, or 3.4%, of the
235 four-digit SIC code industries had higher incidence rates than this
industry in 1980.
55
CHAPTER IV
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SAFE WORK PRACTICES FOR
THE PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS INDUSTRY
The safe work practices recommended in this chapter are presented as ways to
reduce and control injuries resulting from precasting operations. The
hazardous tasks identified, as well as the patterns of accident causal
factors developed in Chapter III, indicate potential problem areas that have
been given insufficient emphasis by the precasting industry. The solutions
offered in the following safety recommendations may not be entirely suitable
for a specific plant. In some instances, management may even view the
recommendations as counterproductive to their operations. In these
instances, the responsible persons (plant managers, safety managers, and/or
plant owners) should interpret and modify the recommendations to make them
applicable to their specific needs. It is essential that, in any
modification of the recommended safe work practices, a similar quality of
worker protection be provided.
The goal of this study has been to identify hazards in precasting opera
tions and to recommend applicable and manageable means to alleviate them.
The safety recommendations presented are not meant to be all-inclusive or to
supersede the OSHA General Industry Standards, which offer adequate
regulatory guidelines for many of the tasks, tools, and equipment used in
the precast concrete products industry. Emphasis has been placed on
recommendations for safe work practices which address tasks, activities, and
tools commonly associated with injuries.
This preliminary section presents safe work practices for the tasks, acti
vities, and tools that are commonly used throughout precasting operations.
Included in this section are the recommendations for manual and mechanical
57
materials handling, handtools, worker proximity to operations, welding and
cutting, chemical handling, ladders and scaffolding, and chipping/cleaning.
58
b. Assistive Devices
d. Training
59
Training programs are means of conveying information to workers. A
goal of training programs is that workers will alter their work
habits by substituting safer work practices for various unsafe
techniques. This form of behavioral modification usually requires
feedback to the workers. Supervisors and employers must take the
time to positively reinforce safe practices and constructively
criticize unsafe practices. Effective training is approached as an
ongoing interaction among all plant employees and not a one time
exposure to the training material [31].
60
outside the cab with controls easily within reach
of the operator [33]
o A spirit level at the outrigger controls for level
ing [33]
o Adequate lighting for night operation, including
backup lights for mobile units [33]
o Wheel chocks on mobile units to block movement on
slopes when the equipment is left unattended or is
undergoing maintenance [33]
o A fire extinguisher and a first-aid kit [32]
o Rearview mirrors on both sides of mobile equip
ment [33]
o Self-closing filler caps and flame arresters on fuel
tanks [33]
o Slip-resistant material on crane surfaces subject to
foot traffic [33].
61
(d) All capacities listed on the load chart for machine
"on outriggers" and "on tires" are based on the crane
being level and on solid support. The importance of
leveling cannot be overemphasized. The
manufacturers' capacity tables should be referred to
for both outriggers and tires, since lifting capacity
is reduced markedly when the crane is not level [33].
62
o Not back up the machine without first making certain
that no one will be endangered (when vision of the
area behind the crane is blocked, use a signalman)
o Sound an audible alarm (horn) before moving a crane
and whenever the crane is approaching other workers
o Sound an audible alarm whenever a suspended load is
approaching employees to give them time to move
o Never operate the crane within 10 feet of energized
high-voltage powerlines.
63
o Making sure that the hoist rope or chain is never
wrapped around the load or completely wrapped around
a hook
o Attaching the load to the hook by slings or other
rigging devices that are adequate for the load
being lifted
o Securing the unused legs of a multileg sling before
lifting loads with one leg
o Remembering when a bundled load is picked up that
the material will tend to "nest" and create pinch
points, and when a load is landed, it will tend to
roll or spread out
o Making sure wood blocks or short lengths of steel
are not carried loosely on tops of loads
o Making sure wire rope or chain is never allowed to
lie on the ground for any length of time or on damp
or wet surfaces, rusty steel, or near corrosive
substances
o Avoiding draping rope slings from beneath loads
o Keeping all rope or chain clear of flame cutting
and electric welding operations
o Making sure shackles are not rigged with the run
ning rope against the pin, causing it to "spin out"
and drop the load
o Ensuring proper load/shackle alignment by using
spacers such as washers
o Keeping the load under control with guide ropes or
tag lines.
64
(4) Handling of the load
65
b. Straddle Carriers
c. Forklifts
66
industrial truck or between mast uprights or other parts
of a truck where shearing or crushing hazards exist.
(11) When leaving the vehicle, the worker should shut off the
engine, set the brakes, and lower the lifting forks to the
ground.
d. Chain Hoists
67
o Use safety latch hooks
o Chock or block loads before working under them
o Not use "cheaters" on the hoist handles. The handle
length is matched to the safe lifting capacity of the
hoist, and while the cheater extension may temporarily
enable a greater load to be lifted, it may tax the hoist
and lead to failure.
e. Conveyors
f. Front-end Loaders
68
(3) Loader operators should be sure other workers are in the
clear before starting or moving the machine [36].
(A) Operators should not move loads over the heads of other
workmen or over truck cabs [36].
3. Handtools
a. Powered
(3) Abrasive wheels and stones must have a safety guard cover
ing the spindle end, nut, and flange projections. The
safety guard should be mounted to maintain proper
alignment with the wheel; the strength of the fastenings
should exceed the strength of the guard [32].
69
sufficient to prevent excessive pressure from mount
ing and spindle expansion
o All contact surfaces of wheels, blotters, and flang
es are flat and free of foreign matter'
o When a bushing is used in the wheel hole, it does not
exceed the width of the wheel and does not contact
the flanges.
b. Unpowered
(1) Train employees to select the correct tool for the job,
and ensure that the tools are available.
70
(c) Crowbars or prybars of proper size and kind should be
selected for the particular prying task. The crowbar
should have a point or toe that will grip the object
to be moved, and a heel to act as a pivot point.
Sometimes it is necessary to use a block of wood under
the heel to prevent the crowbar from slipping and
injuring the hand. Workers should position themselves
so that their bodies will not be in the path of travel
if the prybar slips. Additionally, they should
brace/position themselves so that they will not fall
if the prying forces are released suddenly.
Guardrails may be necessary to prevent workers from
falling to lower levels.
71
products should be done in accordance with the following safe work
practices:
72
6. Chemical Handling
73
this is not practical, then workers in the vicinity of these op
erations should also wear adequate eye and face protection.
1. Form Work
74
b. Form Stripping
(3) Prying tasks should only be performed with the proper tool
(crowbar or prybar). Shovels should not be used as substi
tute s.
(5) As forms are stripped, all excess material, wood, nails, and
bits of wire should be removed so that the area is clean and
safe. After forms are stripped, all nails should be bent or
pulled immediately.
2. Reinforcing
a. Reinforcing Materials/Assemblies
75
suspension chokers and moved in a balanced horizontal posi
tion. They should not be moved in the vertical plane,
o When bars carried by hand are long, bulky, or heavy, more
than one worker should be utilized,
o Rebar materials used in cutting and bending operations
should be located such as to minimize or eliminate the need
for the worker to lift the bar from ground level to the
cutting or bending height,
o Gloves should be worn during strand stringing, vise plac
ing, rebar tying or handling, mesh placement, and cage
handling tasks [39].
b. Metalworking Equipment
c. Stressing
(1) General safety recommendations for stressing include the
following:
o Nicks
o Kinks
o Broken wires
o Excess corrosion.
76
should be at least 12 diameters of the strand or 6
inches, whichever is greater.
(e) Check that the strands in the form are not crossed or
tangled before tensioning.
77
(2) Bed End Protection
(3) Harping
78
T
♦Min.3l_*j
^ .S H IE L D Min.
A
3'
JACKING __T
BED
AREA —
.SHIELD T
Min.
_JL
3'
JACKING BED
AREA
79
Adapted from PCI Safety and Loss Prevention Manual [39].
(4) Dejacking
(5) Detensioning
80
o A strand should be cut with the torch cutter work
ing from the side, not the rear, of the strand.
3. Oiling
a. Supplied air pressure vessels, used for spraying form release
agents, should have both a visible pressure gauge and a pressure
relief valve in proper operating order. Supplied air sprayers
should be labeled for their maximum safe operating pressure and
this pressure should not be exceeded.
c. Material Safety Data Sheets for all form release agents should
be requested, and all applicable safety and health precautions
should be followed.
81
4. Concrete Mixing and Transport
a. Concrete Mixing
(1) Mixer energy sources should be locked out and tagged before
cleaning, maintenance, or repair procedures.
82
(5) In high-noise areas, the following; recommendations should be
adhered to [32]:
b. Concrete Transport
Casting Concrete
a. General
83
(5) Safe access to the points of concrete placement and consol
idation should be provided by s t a i r s , ramps, or ladders.
Also, a properly guarded walking and working surface must be
available.
(6) Safe work platforms should be provided for elevated casting
operations such as v e rtic a l wet casting of pipe.
(7) Rolling s t a i r scaffolds must be equipped with adequate
guardrails on a l l exposed sides, p a rtic u la rly the ends of
the scaffold and the interface between the form and the
scaffold i f a floor or wall opening e x ists.
(8) Employees should be trained in the proper methods of
shoveling, l i f t i n g , and moving heavy m aterials.
(9) Electric vibrators should be inspected for e le c tric a l
continuity and should be properly grounded.
b. Vertical Casting Pipe Machine
(1) Inadvertent entry onto the moving table of pipe machines
should be prevented by one or more of the following
techniques:
o Provide v isib le and audible alarms to warn employees when
the rotating table is ready to move,
o Use remote control devices so that no employee is required
to be on the table during any ro tational cycle,
o Incorporate a short time delay into the control mechanism
to activate alarms before movement of the table, allowing
workers to get off the table or prepare themselves for i t s
motion.
o Guard the outer edge of the machine to prohibit entry onto
the moving table.
(2) The interface (gap) between the rotating table of v e rtic a l
casting machinery and the adjacent floor should be guarded
or designed to prevent the entrapment of workers' hands and
feet. Holes on v e rtic a l casting tables should be covered
when not occupied by pipe forms.
c. Centrifugal Extruding Pipe Machine
(1) Employees should be protected from the hazards of being
caught in or struck by machine p a rts, or struck by flying
p a rtic le s (aggregate and cement) during centrifugal or
spinning pipemaking processes by the following techniques:
o Guard a l l areas where projections, bolts or nip points,
84
form release clamps, or other nonsmooth, spinning surfaces
create a hazard,
o Use remote control operating devices.
o Interlock a l l removable guards to the remote operating con
tro ls to prevent s ta r t up when guards are not in position,
o Provide a well-drained working surface to minimize the
amount of sp illed concrete and eliminate standing water.
(2) During troweling operations, a proximity detector or t r i p
wire mechanism with a positive stop braking system should be
used to prevent the inadvertent entrapment of the worker in
adjacent moving parts.
(3) Housekeeping and cleanup of discharged aggregate and/or
water should not be performed while spin casting machines
are in motion.
6. Finishing
a. Finishers should neither stand on nor work under suspended loads.
b. Adequate and safe work platforms should be provided for a l l
elevated finishing a c t iv it ie s .
c. Grinders (abrasive stone) should be equipped with properly
adjusted guards. A maximum of one-fourth inch of the working
surface should be exposed. The distance between the guard and
the stone should be no greater then one-fourth inch [32].
d. The exposed blades of concrete saws should be guarded. A
retractable lower-blade guard should be used.
e. Where caustic or acidic m aterials are used, the following pro
tective measures should be provided and used in case of s p ill s
on employees' skin or clothing:
o Employees should be kept informed of the i r r i t a n t m aterials
which they use and instructed in appropriate emergency pro
cedures in case of accidental contamination of skin or cloth
ing.
o Eyewash f a c i l i t i e s and showers must be readily accessible to
finishers.
o Gloves and safety goggles should be worn when workers are using
or chipping epoxy [39].
o Contaminated clothing should be removed immediately and the
affected skin area flushed with water for a minimum of 15
minutes.
7. Curing
a. Employees should be protected against contact with steam and hot
85
water lines used for accelerated curing of concrete products by
insulation, location, or guarding.
o Palletized or strapped
o Individually crated
o Secured to an A-frame
86
o Chocked and chained, or
o Chained and provided with proper dunnage.
2. Working/Walking Surfaces
87
TABLE IV-1
RECOMMENDED PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Foot Steel-toed safety Falling or dropped objects, striking Safety boots should be worn by
boots, covering at against products, ground-level all employees. Boots should have
least the ankle obstacles, spilled concrete, ankle rubber or synthetic composition,
sprains nonslip soles without high or
narrow heels and steel insoles.
Face Face shields Particles thrown off by such Shields should be worn by all
operations as spraying or grinding employees performing spraying or
grinding tasks. Shields should
be replaced when plastic is
cracked, brittle, or badly
scratched.
Skin Clothes suitable Caustic materials, entanglement in Loose sleeves or torn, ragged
for work performed machinery clothing should not be worn.
Buttoned, long-sleeved shirts
and trousers without cuffs
should be worn when casting,
finishing, welding, or burning.
TABLE IV-1
RECOMMENDED PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (Continued)
Rubber gloves Abrasions and caustics resulting from Rubber gloves should be worn, as
handling wet material needed, during some mixing and
finishing tasks.
Safety eyeglasses Small-sized particles thrown off by Welders must also wear safety
with side shields such operations as metal sawing, glasses in addition to a welding
sanding, and chipping of concrete helmet.
Welder's helmet Molten metal splashes; ultraviolet and Helmets must be worn by all
visible radiation depending upon the welders. Helmets protect the
correct type of filter lens for the face, forehead, neck, and ears
exposure from direct exposure to
radiation from the arc
TABLE IV-1
RECOMMENDED PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (Concluded)
Hearing Earplugs Noise levels between 90 and 130 dB(A), All employees exposed to an
depending on the type and quality of 8-hour time-weighted average of
earplug 85 decibels or greater must be
provided with hearing protection.
Ear muffs Noise levels between 90 and 135 dB(A) Employers must administer
depending on the quality and type of effective hearing conservation
earplug used with the ear muff programs to all employees exposed
to noise levels equal to or
exceeding an 8-hour
time-weighted sound level of 85
decibels in accordance with the
provisions of 29 CFR 1910.95.
Respir Respirators, dust Harmful dusts, fumes, mists, and NIOSH/MSHA-approved respirators
atory masks vapors must be worn by employees
exposed to toxic agents. Respir
ators may be required when spray
ing, sand blasting, mixing, or
working in storage silos.
(c) To protect the operator and other employees from in-going nip
points, rotating parts, flying chips, or sparks, one or more of
the following guarding methods should be used:
o Barrier guards
(e) All p< tions of the saw blade on bandsaws must be [32]:
91
blade between the bottom of the guide rolls and the table
(bandsaw wheels should be fully encased)
o Each planing and molding machine must have all cutting heads
and saws covered by a guard,
o Each disk sanding machine should have the exhaust hood or
other guard arranged to enclose the revolving disk, except
for that portion of the disk above the table if a table is
used.
o Belt sanding machines should have guards at each nip point
where the sanding belt enters a pulley. The unused run of
the sanding belt should be guarded against accidental contact.
92
Chapter V
SAFETY MANAGEMENT
93
program, and i t w ill identify the major accident prevention deficiencies
within the program i t s e l f .
Assessment of the following basic elements of the safety program should be
made:
1. Management leadership
2. Assignment of responsibility
3. Id en tificatio n and control of hazards
4. Employee and supervisory training
5. Accident reporting and investigation
6. Emergency plans
7. Employee awareness.
U tilization of pre-assessment tools such as the American Society of Safety
Engineers (ASSE) Safety Audit contained in Appendix C, or the example
assessment forms contained in Appendix D can provide insight into safety
program weaknesses which need management's attention.
B. Basic Elements of a Safety Program
It is d if f ic u lt to outline a safety program that w ill be applicable to a ll
precast concrete plants, since a program must vary with the specific needs
of each company. It is important that a safety program be tailored for the
processes and operations of an individual company. I t becomes the
responsibility of management to design and define a program within the
constraints of a specific p la n t's operation. A safety program should,
however, include aspects of the following basic elements:
1. Management Leadership
Management's in te re st in safety must be sincere and v isib le to
employees. Therefore, senior management must establish achievable
safety program objectives and communicate these to a l l employees. The
safety program objectives should receive the same management scrutiny as
that given for the control of quality, cost, and production. Once the
objectives are established, then management must plan, organize and
control the overall program to meet the objectives.
Management's leadership and support should contain the following key
elements:
a. Written Policy
A written safety policy is management's method of communicating a
direction to be followed. I t is the f i r s t step in organizing to
meet the stated objectives. I t is important that the policy be in
writing to reduce confusion concerning direction and assignment of
responsibility.
94
The written policy should be concise, to the point, and should
address the following areas:
o Management's intent
o Scope of a c tiv itie s covered
o Measurement of safety performance
o Safety sta ff
o Safety committee
o Delegation of authority
o Safety rules and procedures [44].
Policy statements signed by top management are indicative of th eir
concern for employee safety and health. Such concerns by top
management for safety makes i t easier:
o For supervisors to implement and enforce company policy
o For the company to promote safe and healthful work practices
o For employees to observe the stated policy
o To purchase equipment with specified safety features
o To maintain and repair equipment according to good
engineering control and safety practices [45].
Figures V-l and V-2 are shown to provide examples of plant safety
policies. Selection of these examples are not indicative of th e ir
overall quality except that a published safety policy available to
employees is b e tte r than none at a l l .
b. Employee Participation
95
SAFETY AND HEALTH POLICY
Company President
President
97
in v e s tig a tio n s , safety meetings, and safety committees; which
conducts p erio d ic housekeeping in sp e c tio n s; or which observes the
plant safety ru le s while conducting a p la n t sa fe ty walk-through is
seen by the employees as being serio us about the program.
Management thereby communicates i t s concern about the program.
d. Rewarding Performance
Management should e s t a b l is h procedures for rewarding e f f e c t iv e
safety performance. Worker behavior p a tte r n s are strengthened by
p o sitiv e reinforcement rewards. Reinforcing safety performance has
the following advantages:
o I t removes the unwanted side e f f e c t s of d is c i p l i n e , confron
t a t i o n , c o n f l i c t , and f r u s t r a t i o n
o I t increases employee job s a t i s f a c t i o n
o Employees see the foreman or supervisor as a h e lp fu l resource
o I t c re a te s an atmosphere of mutual r e c ip ro c ity between super
v iso r and employee
o I t in c re a se s the p ro b a b ility of an employee continuing the
safe b e h a v io r[45].
2. Assignment of R e sp o n sib ility
Management has the r e s p o n s i b il i ty for c o n tro llin g unsafe a c ts of
employees and unsafe working c o n d ition s. U ltim ately, the p la n t manager
has the o v e ra ll r e s p o n s i b il i ty for meeting the p l a n t 's sa fe ty program
o b je c tiv e s.
Since p la n t size and o rg an iza tio n al s tr u c tu r e vary widely throughout the
p re ca st concrete products in d u stry , assignment of safety
r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s must be app ro p riate for the management s tr u c tu r e w ithin
the p la n t. In very small p la n ts , the owner/operator may have sole
r e s p o n s i b il i ty ; in la r g e r p la n ts , r e s p o n s i b il i ty is assigned to the
p lan t manager, middle managers and f i r s t - l i n e su p e rv iso rs.
A d d ition ally , the employees must also be assigned r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s in
order to meet the sta te d safety program o b je c tiv e s .
a. Plant manager r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s include:
o Adopting and implementing a safety program w ithin a l l p la n t
department s
o E sta b lish in g and communicating the sa fe ty o b je c tiv e s
o Providing managers and supervisors with the time, money,
manpower, and a u th o rity necessary to implement the safety
program
o Motivating a l l subordinate managers to f u l f i l l t h e i r
assigned r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s
o Auditing the sa fe ty program and evaluating i t s e ffe c tiv e n e s s
98
o Ensuring th a t the p la n t complies with the various fe d e r a l,
s t a t e , and local safety standards and codes [47].
b. Middle manager r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s include:
o Supplementing basic formal accident prevention tra in in g
provided subordinate supervisors with personal and group
i n s t r u c t io n
o Conducting sa fe ty meetings with subordinate supervisors
o P a r ti c ip a ti n g in accident in v e s tig a tio n s and implementing
recommended c o r re c tiv e actio n s to prevent recurrence
o Conducting planned safety in sp ectio n s
o Ensuring subordinate supervisors properly o r ie n t and i n
s t r u c t employees assigned to new job p o sitio n s
o Maintaining sa fe ty d is c i p li n e
o Ensuring subordinate supervisors enforce use of personal
p ro te c tiv e equipment where required
o Recommending sa fe ty program improvements [47].
c. F i r s t - l i n e supervisor r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s include:
o Being resp o n sib le fo r the safety of a l l re g u la rly assigned
employees
o Ensuring th a t assigned personnel know p la n t and department
safety ru le s and r e g u la tio n s , e s ta b lis h e d safe job proced
u res, and a l l major hazards a sso c ia ted with t h e i r tasks and
work areas
o Developing cooperative safety a t t i t u d e s of employees through
a p p lic a tio n of approved methods of preventive and c o r re c tiv e
d is c i p li n e
o Conducting planned safety in sp e c tio n s w ith in the assigned
work area
o Maintaining s a t is f a c t o r y standards of housekeeping
o Providing prompt medical treatment fo r a l l i n j u r i e s no m atter
how s l i g h t
o In v e s tig a tin g a l l reported ac cid en ts to personnel and equip
ment w ithin h is assigned area
o Ensuring assigned personnel use the req uired sa fe ty apparel
and equipment
o Knowing sa fe ty standards which apply to the o peratio n s he
supervises
o Knowing how to operate emergency equipment i n s t a l l e d w ithin
his assigned work area
o Recommending sa fe ty program improvements [47].
d. Employee r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s include:
o Obeying p la n t safety ru le s and safe o peratin g procedures
o Reporting hazards to immediate su perviso rs
o Reporting ac cid en ts promptly and fa c tu a l ly to t h e i r immedi
ate su p e rv iso rs.
99
3. I d e n t i f i c a t i o n and C o n tr o l o f H a z a rd s
Whenever management decides to e it h e r implement an accident prevention
program or to overhaul an e x is tin g program, employees are in c lin e d to be
sk e p tic a l of pro jected r e s u l t s and tend to take a "wait and see"
a t t i t u d e . A vigorous management e f f o r t to elim in ate longstanding
hazards and to provide a sa fe r workplace can convince employees th a t
management is tru ly concerned about t h e i r o n -th e -jo b well being.
However, p r io r to e lim in atin g these hazards, management must f i r s t
id e n tify them. I d e n t i f i c a t i o n of hazards re q u ire s a f a i r l y complete
in sp ectio n of a l l p re c a st operating a reas. The in sp e c tio n should be
made by a small group composed of someone from production, someone from
maintenance, and the safety program c o o rd inator. The hazard
i d e n t i f i c a t i o n process should be done in phases to reduce in te rfe re n c e
with normal work ro u tin e s.
Safety in sp ectio n c h e c k li s t s may be h e lp fu l in d ir e c tin g the g roup's
in sp ectio n to the o perating areas with the more hazardous work
exposures. Management can e i t h e r o b ta in c h e c k lis ts from insurance
companies, or develop one s p e c i f i c a l l y fo r t h e i r p la n t a f t e r a n a ly s is of
the inju ry data presented in Chapter I I I , Table I I I - 5 . As an example,
analyze n a ils as a source of in ju ry . The ta b le shows th a t n a i l s mostly
re s u lte d in puncture i n j u r i e s to employee's f e e t. Therefore, i t is
assumed th a t when wooden forms are removed from cured product, the n a i l s
are not bent over or removed, thereby c re a tin g a hazard to workers.
Analysis of the "machinery" source in d ic a te s th a t lack of adequate
guards are c re a tin g a hazard. I f these sources of injury are present
w ithin the p la n t, the c h e c k lis t should address these items.
A fter the i n i t i a l in sp e c tio n has been performed, a program for
c o rre c tin g the noted d e f ic ie n c ie s and performing p erio d ic in sp ectio n s
should be e s ta b lis h e d . Id e n tify in g hazards by means of in sp e c tio n and
promptly elim in ating or c o n tro llin g them i s one of the b est methods
management can use to demonstrate i t s i n t e r e s t and concern fo r accident
prevention to employees.
Periodic inspections are e s s e n t i a l to:
o Id en tify new or re c u rrin g hazards
o Ensure safe o p e ra tio n of equipment
o Detect use of required personal p ro te c tiv e equipment
o Keep check on general housekeeping
o Ensure a v a i l a b i l i t y of f i r s t aid m a te r ia ls
o Ensure f i r e fig h tin g equipment is in proper o perating c o n d ition
o Check on c o n d itio n of storage areas [48].
4. Safety Training
In ranking of importance, employee tr a in in g is of top p r i o r i t y in a
safety management program. Training is necessary to guide and i n s t r u c t
100
both new employees and employees new to a p a r t i c u l a r ta s k . Newly h ired
employees should always receive i n s t r u c t i o n and o r i e n t a t i o n about the
company, the p la n t, the product, o rg a n iz a tio n a l arrangements, lin e s of
a u th o rity , and safety p o l i c i e s and r u le s . S pecific t r a in i n g , including
supervised o n-th e-job t r a in i n g , must be provided to each employee.
During o r i e n t a t i o n to the p la n t, a new employee should be given copies
of the company's safety p o licy , and safety ru le s and re g u la tio n s . If an
employee s t a r t s a new task , changes ta s k s, or uses new or modified
equipment, i t is e s s e n t i a l th a t q u a lity t r a in i n g for t h i s job be
provided. Training may be necessary to develop a p a r t i c u l a r s k i l l th a t
cannot be performed sa fe ly without sp e c ific knowledge; e . g . , working at
a rebar bender, c a stin g concrete, or operating a f o r k l i f t . Safety
tr a in in g is based on the general assumption th a t the development of a
p o s itiv e mental a t t i t u d e predisposes an in d iv id u a l to safe h a b its of
work and conduct. A job should be explained in d e t a i l by breaking i t
down in to manageable p a r ts . If personal p ro te c tiv e equipment is
req uired , employees must understand why i t must be used and what may
happen i f i t i s not used properly. Hazards should be i d e n t i f i e d , and
precautions or safe work p ra c tic e s demonstrated. Training should take a
new employee through each ste p , and each step should be fu lly
demonstrated. In a d d itio n , the supervisor should v e r if y , a t re g u la r
i n t e r v a l s , th at the o r i g i n a l lessons are being followed and th a t the
employee is not developing bad h a b its or taking dangerous s h o r tc u ts .
The type of tra in in g re q u ire d , by employee group, is presented in Table
V-l.
Other t r a in in g , such as f i r s t - a i d courses, cardiopulmonary r e s u s c i t a
tio n (CPR), f i r e e x tin g u ish e r use, and o th er emergency procedures may be
re q u ire d .
Training is a continuous p rocess, and a tt e n t i o n must be paid to a l l
employees. An employee who continues to repeat an unsafe procedure i s
not working s a fe ly , even i f an accident has not occurred. The following
in d ic a to rs might show a need fo r tra in in g or re tra in in g :
o High incidence of injury
o An increase in the number of "near misses" th a t could have r e
su lted in accidents
o A change in a process or in tro d u c tio n of a new process
o A recent upswing in a c tu a l accident experience
o Excessive waste or scrap due to poor housekeeping.
5. Accident In v e s tig a tio n
The in v e s tig a tio n of a ccid en ts is an important p art of the sa fe ty /a c c id e n t
prevention program. I t i d e n t i f i e s accident causes so th a t sim ila r
s i tu a tio n s can be prevented by management a c tio n s such as mechanical im
provements, b e t t e r su pervision , or employee t r a in i n g . I t determines the
"changes" or d ev iatio n th a t produced an "e rro r" r e s u l ti n g in an a c cid en t; i t
101
TABLE V-l
EMPLOYEE TRAINING
Personnel to Receive
Training A ctivity Training Sources of Training
O rie n ta tio n All new employees Personnel department, safety
personnel, su p e rv iso rs, foremen;
PCI sa fe ty o r i e n t a t i o n s l i d e / ta p e
Manual m a te ria ls All employees, National Safety C ouncil's " L ift
handling, including including foremen, Safely" b oo k let, NIOSH's "Work
l i f t i n g , p u llin g , management personnel P ra ctice s Guide for Manual L i f t
pushing in g ," sa fe ty personnel, insurance
companies
Housekeeping, All employees, PCI storage s l i d e / t a p e , sa fe ty
storage including foremen, personnel, foremen
management personnel
Cranes, h o is ts All o p e ra to rs, o i l e r s , Operator c e r t i f i c a t i o n programs,
mechanics, foremen formal t r a in i n g through
equipment manufacturers or
schools, dry runs
Mechanical mater All d r i v e r s , rig g e rs , PCI handling s l i d e / t a p e , equip
i a l s handling, leadmen, supervisors ment m anufacturers, o n-th e-job
rigging tra in in g
F o r k l if ts F o r k l i f t o p e ra to rs, National Safety Council, equip
help ers ment m anufacturers, on-th e-job
and c e r t i f i c a t i o n tra in in g
Road v eh icles Truck d r i v e r s , over- Insurance companies, o n -th e -
the-road v eh icle job t r a in i n g , s t a t e lic e n sin g
operators requirtiments
Personal p ro te c tiv e All employees Safety personnel, foremen
equipment
R e sp ira to r use VTe ld e rs , h e lp e rs, Safety personnel, equipment
f i n i s h e r s , foremen manufacturers
Welding All welders, h elp ers, On-the-job t r a i n i n g , unions,
foremen equipment manufacturers
F i r s t aid Foremen, leadmen, Red Cross, safety/m edical
supervisors department
Plant operations All workers, leadmen, Supervisors, foremen, safety
foremen involved personnel
102
p u b lic iz e s the p a r t i c u l a r hazard among employees and t h e i r su p e rv iso rs; and
i t d i r e c t s a tt e n t i o n to accident prevention in g en eral. Since nothing is
learned from unreported a c cid en ts, even minor i n j u r i e s and near misses
should be in v e stig a te d .
The in v e s tig a tio n of a ccid en ts i s the r e s p o n s i b il i ty of a l l le v e ls of
management. However, the f i r s t l i n e supervisor i s perhaps the b est q u a l i
fie d , since he i s close to the job s, working c o n d itio n s, and workers. The
supervisor must be tra in e d and have the a b i l i t y to recognize the cause of
a c c id e n ts. This e valuation may require the a s s is ta n c e of management,
equipment su p p lie rs , and insurance re p re s e n ta tiv e s . Figure V-3 shows an
example of an accident in v e s tig a tio n form.
The basic problem confronting any supervisor interview ing a person involved
in an accident is obtaining complete f a c ts . Often a worker i s r e lu c ta n t to
cooperate for fe a r of r i d i c u l e , sarcasm, or reprimand. I t i s important to
s t r e s s the need for f a c ts so th a t recurrence can be prevented in the
fu tu re . I t is also h e lp fu l to ask in d iv id u a ls involved in accid en ts fo r
t h e i r ideas on making the job s a fe r.
Witnesses are important sources of accident inform ation. When a f a t a l
in ju ry occurs, a w itness may be the only d i r e c t source of information
a v a ila b le . When a serio us injury occurs, a w itness may be the only means of
v e rify in g incoherent pieces of the i n j u r e d 's account. For minor i n j u r i e s , a
w itness may be able to c l a r i f y some of the circumstances surrounding the
accident b e t t e r than the in ju re d person him self. This i s a lso tru e of near
accid en ts th a t have a p o t e n t i a l for serio us in ju ry .
In a l l cases, a l l le v e ls of management can le a rn how to prevent accid en ts
through in v e s tig a tio n s . By in v e s tig a tin g a c cid en ts, sim ila r unsafe
p r a c tic e s and conditions can be monitored in the fu tu r e . The information
compiled can also help to design b e t t e r t r a in i n g programs, emphasize areas
needing management's a t t e n t i o n , and g en erally prevent fu ture p o te n tia l
problems.
Management's p a r t i c i p a t i o n is highly important to a functioning safety
program in the p recast concrete products in d u stry . E ffo rts should be made
to reduce the unnecessary co sts of worker inju ry and i l l n e s s , loss in
production time, as well as re p a ir and replacement of damaged machinery and
p ro d u c ts.
6. Emergency Plans
Management should have a w r itte n plan of a c tio n o u tlin in g procedures to be
taken in emergency s i t u a t io n s such as employee in ju ry and f i r e . The purpose
of the plan is to e lim in ate as much confusion as p o ssib le in order th a t
immediate p o s itiv e response w ill be taken to minimize the dangers of the
emergency.
103
A C C I D E N T IN V E S T I G A T I O N REP O R T FORM
FOREMAN WITNESSED BY
MEDICAL DISPOSITION
Complete and return to the safety office for
review by top manaqement within two days: SENT OUT RETURNED
Describe what took place, what task
WHAT HAPPENED? and operation was being done.
Management Date
104
o P rovision of f i r s t - a i d treatment
o Provision of medical treatm ent.
C. Post-Assessment of Program
The primary purpose of assessment is to ensure th a t the safety program is
being applied e f f e c t iv e ly and c o r re c tly by a l l le v e ls of management.
The post-assessment of a safety program is performed a f t e r ad d itio n s or
a l t e r a t i o n s have been implemented in to the program. The post-assessm ent of
the program is accomplished to:
o Determine serious weaknesses in a p p lic a tio n s of the program
o Id e n tify c o r re c tiv e a ction s needed to improve the q u a lity of the
program
o Motivate middle managers and supervisors to apply the safety program.
Assessment of the program should be made in the following areas:
o Accident in v e s tig a tio n s
o Control of hazards
o Conduct of safety insp ectio ns
o Safety tra in in g
o Safety a tt i tu d e
o Safe work procedures
o Management p a r t i c i p a t i o n .
The example forms contained in Appendix D can be u t i l i z e d as p o s t- a s s e s s -
ment to o ls . Analysis of the r e s u l t s obtained from the forms can provide
plan t management with in d ic a to rs as to which basic elements of the o v e ra ll
program need management's a tt e n t i o n . Management must make a p p lic a tio n of
the safety program happen. This re q u ire s planned implementation of
c o n tro ls , continuous management involvement, and p erio d ic assessment to
ensure e f f e c tiv e program o p e ra tio n s.
Suggested Reading L ist on Safety Management:
Anton, T .J. Occupational Safety and Health Management. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill, 1979. 295 pp.
Bird, F . E . ; Loftos, R.G. Loss Control Management. L oganville, GA:
I n s t i t u t e Press, 1976. 562 pp.
Chissick, S.S.; D e rric o t, R . , eds. Occupational Health and Safety
Management. New York, NY: Wiley, 1981. 705 pp.
Denton, D.K. Safety Management, Improving Performance. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill, 1982. 304 pp.
105
G r i f f i t h s , R .F ., ed. Dealing with Risk: the Planning, Management, and
A cc e p ta b ility of Technological Risk. New York, NY: Wiley, 1981. 144
pp.
Grimaldi, J . V . ; Simonds, R.H. Safety Management, 3rd. Ed. Homewood,
IL: R. D. Irwin, 1975. 694 pp.
Hammer, W. Occupational Safety Management and Engineering, 2nd. Ed.
Englewood C l if f s , NJ:P r e n t i c e - H a ll , 1981. 494 pp.
H einrich, H.W.; P etersen, D.; Roos, N.R. I n d u s t r i a l Accident
Prevention: A Safety Management Approach. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill,
1980. 468 pp.
Kochan, T.A. ; Dyer, L.; Lipsky, D.B.. The E ffec tiv e n e ss of
Union-Management Safety and Health Committees. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E.
Upjohn I n s t i t u t e for Employment Research, 1977. 127 pp.
P etersen, D. Human Error Reduction and Safety Management. New York,
NY: Garland STPM P ress, 1982. 229 pp.
P etersen, D. Analyzing Safety Performance. New York, NY: Garland STPM
Press, 1980. 328 pp.
P etersen, D. Techniques of Safety Management, 2nd. Ed. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill, 1978. 314 pp.
Schenkelbach, L. The Safety Management Primer. Homewood, IL: Dow
Jones-Irw in, 1975. 150 pp.
T a rra n ts, W.E. The Measurement of Safety Performance. New York, NY:
Garland STPM Press, 1980. 414 pp.
106
CHAPTER VI
RECOMMENDATION FOR RESEARCH NEEDS
107
REFERENCES
1. Pedersen, D. P r o f ile of SIC 3272—P ro f ile Summary of Dun and B ra d stree t
Data in NIOSH I n d u s t r i a l F ile . Unpublished rep ort by National I n s t i t u t e
for Occupational Safety and Health, C in c in n a ti, OH: March 17, 1981. 1 p.
2. Pennsylvania Department of Labor. 1979 Pennsylvania In d u s tr ia l
D irectory, 26th ed. H arrisburg, PA: Bureau of S t a t i s t i c s , Research,
and Planning, O ffice of Management S ervices. 1979. pp. 732-5.
3. U.S. Department of Commerce. Concrete, P la s t e r , and Cut Stone
Products. P u b lic a tio n No. MC77-1-32D. Industry S eries 1977 Census of
Manufacturers. Washington, DC: Bureau of Census. 1977. 45 pp.
4. Duffy, J. J. American Concrete Pipe A sso ciatio n. Unpublished re p o rt.
Vienna, VA: August 5, 1981. 1 p.
5. Freedman, S. P re stresse d Concrete I n s t i t u t e . Unpublished re p o r t.
Chicago, IL: July 21, 1981. 1 p.
6. T ilfo rd , J. E. National Precast Concrete A ssociation. Unpublished
re p o r t. In d ian ap o lis, IN: July 29, 1981. 1 p.
7. Bennett, W. B. J r . P re stre s sin g Improves C oncrete's Competitive
Advantage. Concrete C onstruction. March 1981. pp. 235, 237, 239.
8. American Concrete Pipe A ssociation. Concrete Pipe Handbook. Vienna,
VA: 1980. pp 2-8 to 2-17.
9. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational I n j u r ie s and I l l n e s s e s in the
United S tates by In d ustry , 1978 and 1979. Washington, DC: Bureau of
Labor S t a t i s t i c s .
10. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational I n ju r ie s and I l l n e s s e s in the
United States by In d ustry , 1976. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor
S t a t i s t i c s . 1979. p. 26.
11. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational I n j u r ie s and I l l n e s s e s in the
United S tates by In d ustry , 1977. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor
S t a t i s t i c s . 1980. p. 25.
12. U.S. Department of Labor. Occupational I n j u r ie s and I l l n e s s e s in the
United S tates by In dustry, 1979 and 1980. Washington, DC: Bureau of
Labor S t a t i s t i c s . 1980. p. 3.
109
13. National Council on Compensation Insurance. Workers' Compensation
Experience—Codes 3030 and 4034. New York, NY: 1975-1978. Unpaginated.
14. Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of C a lifo rn ia .
C la s s if ic a ti o n Experience Class Code 4034. San Francisco, CA: 1977. 1 p.
15. Compensation Rating and Insurance Bureau for New Jersey . January 1,
1981 Rate Revision. NJ: 1977. p. 320.
16. New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board. C l a s s if ic a ti o n
Experience—Codes 4034 and 3030. New York, NY: 1977. 1 p.
17. The State of Texas— S ta te Board of Insurance. Raw Data Cards for
C la s s if ic a tio n Codes 3030 and 4034. A ustin, TX: 1977. 1 p.
18. Workmen's Compensation Fund, S ta te of West V irg in ia . Class C-4.
Charleston, WV: State Compensation Commissioner. June 30, 1977. 5 pp.
19. Pennsylvania Compensation Rating Bureau. S ta te s of Pennsylvania and
Delaware for Class 511. P h ila d e lp h ia , PA: 1975-1978. pp. 40, 86.
20. Department of Labor and In d u s trie s , S ta te of Washington. S t a t i s t i c s for
F isc a l Years (June through July) 1976 through 1978. Olympia, WA:
October 1981. 3 pp. Unpublished Report.
21. S tate of Wyoming Workers' Compensation D ivision. Major C l a s s if ic a ti o n
#32— Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products—Total Reported P ay ro ll,
Premium C ollected, No. of I n j u r ie s , Total of Claims Paid. WY: October
1981. 2 pp. Unpublished Report.
22. National Safety Council. Accident Facts, 1979 ed. Chicago, IL: 1979.
pp. 4-5.
23. Root, W. ; McCaffrey, D. Providing More Information on Work Injury and
I l l n e s s . Monthly Labor Review 101(4): 16-21, 1979.
24. U.S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor S t a t i s t i c s . Supplementary
Data System (SDS). Unpublished Accident and Injury Data fo r 1976-1979.
25. Hinze, J. Turnover, new workers, and sa fe ty . J. Const. Div. (ASCE) 104
(C04): 409-17. 1978.
26. Mason, K. Some Aspects of Accident Causation Related to Occupation, Age
and Experience of Worker. Vancouver, Canada: Workers' Compensation
Board of B r i t is h Columbia. 1977. 44 pp.
27. Safety in Manual M aterials Handling. DHEW (NIOSH) Pub. No. 78-185.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Public Health
Service. Centers for Disease Control. National I n s t i t u t e for
Occupational Safety and Health. July 1978.
110
28. Work P ra c tic e s Guide for Manual L iftin g . DHHS (NIOSH) Pub. No. 81-122.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service.
Centers for Disease Control. National I n s t i t u t e for Occupational Health
and Safety. March 1981.
29. How to L ift Safely. U.S. Government P rin tin g O ffice #1980-660-964.
C incinn ati, OH: National I n s t i t u t e fo r Occupational Safety and Health.
1980.
30. Audiovisual Resources in Occupational Safety and Health. DHHS (NIOSH)
Pub. No. 82-102. C in c in n a ti, OH: National I n s t i t u t e for Occupational
Safety and Health. D ivision of Standards Development and Technology
T ransfer. October 1981.
31. Margolis, B. L. ; Kroes, M. H. The Human Side of Accident Prevention.
S p rin g fie ld , IL: Charles C. Thomas. 1975.
32. U.S. Department of Labor. OSHA General Industry Standards—29 CFR
1910. Occupational Safety and Health A dm inistration. 1978. 820 pp.
33. Dickie, D. E. Crane Handbook, 1st ed. Toronto, Canada: Construction
Safety A ssociation of O ntario. 1975. pp. 69, 75, 79-89.
34. Dickie, D. E. Rigging Procedures and P recau tio ns— Chapter 7 of Rigging
Manual, 1st ed. Toronto, Canada: Construction Safety A ssociation of
Ontario. 1975. pp. 169-88.
35. Construction Safety A ssociation of Ontario. "Most i n j u r i e s to dozer
loader and backhoe operators re la te d to poor mounting and dismounting."
The Counsellor. Ontario, Canada: October 1981. pp. 4-5.
36. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Wheel-Type Front End Loaders. EP
385-1-51. July 1979.
37. National Safety Council. Accident Prevention Manual for I n d u s tr ia l
O perations—Engineering and Technology, 8th ed. Chicago, IL: 1980.
38. National Safety Council. S up erviso r's Safety Manual, 5th ed. Chicago,
IL: 1978.
39. P restressed Concrete I n s t i t u t e . PCI Safety and Loss Prevention Manual
Section IV, A through K, M. Chicago, IL: Unpaginaged.
40. C r i t e r i a for a Recommended Standard. . .Working in Confined Spaces.
DHEW (NIOSH) Pub. No. 80-106. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare. Public Health Service. Centers fo r Disease Control. National
I n s t i t u t e for Occupational Safety and Health. December 1979.
Ill
41. TLVs. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical
Agents in the Workroom Environment with Intended Changes fo r 1981.
American Conference of Governmental I n d u s tr ia l H ygienists. C incinn ati,
OH: 1981. 94 pp.
42. Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, U niversity of Waterloo.
Human Factors Engineering Report on Mounting and Dismounting
Construction Equipment. Report prepared for C onstruction Safety
A ssociation of O ntario. September 1980.
43. Guidelines for C ontrolling Hazardous Energy During Maintenance and
Servicing. DHHS (NIOSH) Pub. No. 83-125. Morgantown, WV: N ational
I n s t i t u t e for Occupational Safety and Health. D ivision of Safety
Research. September 1983.
44. Peterson, D. Techniques of Safety Management. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill. 1971. pp. 29-32.
45. Cal./OSHA C onsultation Service. Evaluation of Safety and Health
Program. San F rancisco, CA: C a lifo rn ia Department of I n d u s t r i a l
R elatio n s. 1982.
46. Enviro Control, Inc. Summary Plant Observation Report and Evaluation
(SPORE). (Unpublished report submitted to NIOSH under c o n tra c t No.
210-80-0040). R ockville, MD: October 1981.
47. Euniger, M. Operation Zero Accident Prevention Fundamentals.
P ittsb u rg h , PA: Normax P u b lic a tio n s, Inc. 1972.
48. National Safety Council. Handbook of Occupational Safety and Health.
Chicago, IL: 1976. pp. 2-6.
49. Canadian Standards A ssociation. Precast: Concrete—M aterials and
Construction, 3rd Ed., CAN3-A23.4-M78. O ntario, Canada: 1978. 77 pp.
50. Canadian Standards A ssociation. Q u a lific a tio n Code for Manufacturers of
A rc h ite c tu ra l and S tru c tu ra l P recast Concrete, CSA-A251-1971. O ntario,
Canada: 1971. 121 pp.
51. U.S. Department of Labor. OSHA Construction Industry Standards— 29 CFR
1926. Occupational Safety and Health A dm inistration. 1979. 618 pp.
52. Diekemper, R. F. ; S partz, D.A. A Q u a n titativ e and Q u a lita tiv e Measure
of I n d u s t r i a l Safety A c t i v i t i e s . ASSE J. 15:12-19, December 1970.
112
APPENDIX A
EXAMPLES OF MANUFACTURED CONCRETE PRODUCTS
WITHIN SIC 3272
Appendix A
Examples of Manufactured Concrete
Products w ithin SIC 3272
This appendix contains a l i s t i n g of the v ario u s manufactured concrete
products concerned w ithin the scope of th i s document.
Areaways, basement window: concrete
Art marble: concrete
A rc h ite c tu ra l p recast concrete panels
Ashlar: cast stone
Bathtubs: concrete
Beams and j o i s t s : concrete
Bridge products: p re c a st concrete
Building stone, a r t i f i c i a l : concrete
B urial v a u lts : concrete and p re c a st terra z zo
Catch basin covers: concrete
Ceiling squares: concrete
Chimney caps: concrete
Church fu rn itu re : concrete
Columns: concrete
Conduits: concrete
Copings: concrete
Cribbing: concrete
Doorframes: concrete
Drain t i l e : concrete
F ire p lac e s: concrete
Floor sla b s: p recast concrete
Floor t i l e : p recast concrete
Fountains, wash: p re ca st te rra z z o
Garbage boxes: concrete
Grave markers: concrete
Grease tra p s : concrete
Hollow-core p re stre sse d planks
Housing components, p re fa b ric a te d : concrete
In c in e ra to rs : concrete
I r r i g a t i o n pipe: concrete
Laundry tra y s : concrete
L in te ls : concrete
Manhole covers and frames: concrete
Mantles: concrete
M attresses for r i v e r revetment: concrete a r t i c u l a t e d
Meter boxes: concrete
Monuments: concrete
Panels and se c tio n s, p re fa b ric a te d : concrete
Paving m a te ria ls : p re fa b ric a te d concrete, except blocks
P ie r footings: p re fa b ric a te d concrete
114
P ilin g : p re fa b ric a te d concrete
Pipe: concrete
Poles: concrete
Posts: concrete
Septic tanks: concrete
Shower re c e p to rs: concrete
Siding: p re ca st stone
S ilos: p re fa b ric a te d concrete
Slabs, crossing: concrete
Steps: p re fa b ric a te d concrete
Storage tanks: concrete
S tru c tu ra l p recast p re s tre s s e d concrete products
Tanks: concrete
Thresholds: precast terra z zo
Tombstones: p recast te rra z z o or concrete
Wall base: precast terra z zo
Wall squares: concrete
Well curbing: concrete
Window s i l l s : c a st stone
115
APPENDIX B
REVIEW OF STATE, FEDERAL, AND FOREIGN SAFETY STANDARDS
AND TRADE ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES
APPENDIX B
REVIEW OF STATE, FEDERAL, AND FOREIGN SAFETY STANDARDS
AND TRADE ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES
This appendix contains a review of e x is tin g S ta te , F ederal, and foreign
safety standards as well as trade a s s o c ia tio n g u id elin e s th a t apply to the
p recast concrete products ind u stry.
A. S tate and Foreign Standards
A review of the standards of the S tates th a t adm inister t h e i r own
occupational safety and h e a lth programs shows th a t no S ta te has v e r t i c a l
standards th a t s p e c i f i c a l l y address sa fe ty in the manufacturing of p recast
concrete products. Safety m atters in the remaining S ta tes are re g u la te d by
the OSHA General Industry Standards, 29 CFR 1910 [32].
Occupational safety and h e a lth standards th a t address o perations in the
p re ca st concrete products industry were requested from Germany, the United
Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, A u s tra lia , Canada, and Mexico.
The Canadian standards [49, 50] th a t re g u la te a r c h i t e c t u r a l and s t r u c t u r a l
o perations are included for ev a lu a tio n . A u s tr a lia , France, and Belgium have
standards for the concrete c o n stru c tio n in d u stry , but do not re g u la te
manufacturing o p e ra tio n s. The remaining c o u n trie s do not have safety
standards th at s p e c i f i c a l l y address p recast concrete operatio n s.
B. Trade Association Guidelines
The ACPA has published a "Concrete Pipe Handbook" [8] th a t contains some
suggestions on handling, unloading, and s i t e sto ra g e . The PCI has developed
a "Safety and Loss Prevention Manual" [39] th a t includes se c tio n s on
su bjects such as tr a in in g m otivation, yard s to ra g e , tensioning equipment,
s tre s s in g operatio n s, s t e e l placement, t r a v e l i f t s , chucks, and harping.
These su b je c ts are s p e c i f i c a l l y re la te d to tasks or o perations in the
a r c h i t e c t u r a l and s t r u c t u r a l se c to rs of the ind u stry.
C. Foreign Standards vs. Trade A ssociation Guidelines
In te r n a tio n a l standards and g u id elin e s are incorporated, where appro
p r i a t e , in the comprehensive sa fe ty recommendations presented in Chapter
IV. A comparison of these standards and g u id elin e s are presented t o p i c a l ly ,
by o peratio n , in the following se c tio n .
1. Forming
Canada req uires t h a t , in f a c i l i t i e s for making forms and a c c e sso rie s,
the co n stru c tio n of the forms be w ithin the to le ra n c e s required fo r the
product. They also re q u ire th a t a l l form-making shops have e x its and
118
f i r e f i g h t i n g equipment a p p ro p riate to the work space, m a t e r ia l s , and
expected hazards.
Canada also re q u ire s th a t f a c i l i t i e s for producing p re s tre s s e d con
c r e te elements include measuring equipment for s e t t i n g up and checking
alignments and le v e ls . Canada re q u ire s th a t th e re be adequate d u s t-
c o l l e c t i n g and v e n t i l a t i n g c a p a b i l i t i e s when personnel are in
woodworking shops where wood or p la s t i c forms are made.
2. Reinforcing
Canada re q u ire s th a t work benches or gigs where welding is performed be
arranged so th a t employees are p ro te c te d from welding fla sh e s and th a t
the areas be v e n t il a te d to avoid exposure to excessive welding fumes.
PCI r e f e r s to the OSHA General Industry Standards in 29 CFR 1910.217 and
re q u ire s welding areas to be v e n t il a te d and p ro tected to prevent welding
fla s h .
3. S tressin g
Both Canada and the PCI have sa fe ty requirements fo r s t r e s s i n g opera
t io n s . The PCI re q u ire s th a t a s h ie ld or guard be provided for bed end
p ro te c tio n of the jacking area. There are suggestions fo r the m a te ria ls
for a b a r r i e r , but no s p e c if ic requirements.
4. Oiling
There are no unique sa fe ty standards in any i n t e r n a t i o n a l or consensus
standards th a t address the tasks of t h i s o p e ra tio n , except those
d iscussing walking and working surfaces in the PCI "Safety and Loss P re
vention Manual" [39].
5. Mixing
The PCI has no s p e c if ic s a fe ty standards regarding batching and mixing
th a t r e l a t e to s a fe ty . The Canadian standards re q u ire th a t the batch
p la n t be kept clean a t a l l times.
6. Casting
The PCI recommends th a t gloves, long-sleeved s h i r t s , and long tro u s e rs
be worn when employees are performing any of the v arious tasks re l a t e d
to concrete o p e ra tio n s, such as shoveling, rak in g , v ib r a t in g , and
screeding. The PCI re q u ire s th a t personnel performing the shoveling
tasks be tra in e d in proper procedures to reduce the p o t e n t i a l fo r back
s t r a i n s . They a lso re q u ire th a t ex tru d er hoppers have guards and th a t
a l l e l e c t r i c a l connections be in su la te d or guarded.
The PCI r e f e r s to requirements regarding noise in 29 CFR 1926.52 and CFR
1910.95.
119
7. S trip p in g
There are no s p e c ific requirements in the PCI, ACPA, or Canadian
standards th a t apply to tasks in the s tr ip p in g o p e ra tio n .
8. Curing
The PCI has both recommendations and s p e c if ic requirements concerning
steam, hot o i l , e l e c t r i c , and m oisture curing. They include
requirements for the in s u la tio n of steam, hot: o i l , and hot water lin e s
and for therm ostats, tim ers, and c i r c u i t b reak ers fo r e l e c t r i c curin g .
9. Finishing
The PCI "Safety and Loss Prevention Manual" [39] recommends the use of
rubbersoled shoes where th e re are slip p e ry su rfaces and re q u ire s the use
of hard h a ts , eye p ro te c tio n , knee pads, and gloves in the performance
of c e r t a i n o p e ra tio n s; e . g . , gloves are req uired fo r a l l f i n is h e r s
working with concrete; eye p ro te c tio n is re q u ire d while concrete is
poured; and eye p ro te c tio n is required whenever f i n is h e r s are chipping,
burning, d r i l l l i n g , or grinding.
During sp e cia l fin is h in g processes such as sand b la s t i n g , the PCI r e
q uires adequate exhaust v e n t i l a t i o n and r e s p i r a to r y p ro te c tiv e
equipment. When acid e tch in g i s used as a fin is h in g technique, the PCI
re q u ire s th a t warning signs be posted and v i s i b l e , th a t a l l c a u s tic and
acid products be lab e le d , and th a t employees know the lo c a tio n of the
n e a re st p o rta b le water supply. I t a ls o recommends the use of p ro te c tiv e
face, hand, fo o t, and body clo th in g for employees performing these ta s k s.
10. M aterials Handling
PCI r e f e r s to 29 CFR 1926.600 for c e r t a i n general requirem ents, but also
s p e c ifie s in i t s "Safety and Loss Prevention Manual" [39] th a t o perators
be tra in e d and q u a l if ie d , be able to pass a t l e a s t a verbal examination,
be s p e c i f i c a l l y designated to a p a r t i c u l a r ta s k , and make a d a ily minimum
check of t h e i r equipment. PCI also re q u ire s th a t the grounds be properly
maintained for safe o peratio n s and p r o h ib its the carry in g or holding of
loads over work areas where o th e r employees are p re se n t.
The ACPA re q u ire s th a t product handling conform with the standard
recommendations in i t s handbook.
Canada re q u ire s th a t a l l p hysical production f a c i l i t i e s be la i d o ut,
designed, and con stru cted so th a t there w i l l be adequate space fo r mate
r i a l s , sto ra g e , equipment, and production f a c i l i t i e s , with s u f f i c i e n t
capacity so th a t production can be adequately maintained without
adversely a ffe c tin g the sa fe ty of p la n t, personnel, or products.
The PCI has both general and s p e c i f i c recommendations fo r yard sto ra g e ,
including storage a re a , dunnage, sta ck in g , personnel s a fe ty , s tra n d , and
120
rebar sto ra g e . They a lso have recommendations regarding product t r a n s
p o rta tio n , including o perating ru le s for d rivin g in hazardous weather.
The PCI p ro h ib its the use of drugs and alco ho l; i t a ls o re q u ire s th a t
d riv e rs wear hardhats and sa fe ty shoes.
The OSHA General Industry Standards in 29 CFR 1910 [32] re g u la te sa fe ty and
health in the p re ca st concrete products industry (SIC 3272); however, the
standards do not apply to a l l o p e ra tio n s, ta s k s , and con d ition s s p e c ific to
the in d u stry . Those items in the e x is tin g standards th a t are re l a t e d to the
manufacture and d eliv e ry of p re ca st concrete products are presented in Table
B-l.
Although SIC Code 3272 is reg ulated by OSHA standards under 29 CFR 1910, the
OSHA c o n stru c tio n standards in 29 CFR 1926 con tain elements which are
re la te d to c e r ta i n operatio n s w ithin the p re c a st concrete products
ind u stry. The standards in CFR 1926 th a t impact on working conditions in
the industry are included in Table B-l for inform ational purposes.
E. Summary
OSHA General Industry Standards apply to many of the o p e ra tio n s, ta s k s, and
conditions ty p ic a l of p recast concrete manufacturing o p e ra tio n s. These OSHA
re g u la tio n s address su b je c ts such as walking and working su rfaces,
handtools, v e n t i l a t i o n , n o ise , f i r e prevention, r e s p i r a to r y p ro te c tio n ,
machine guarding, ladders, sc a ffo ld in g , and welding or c u ttin g . OSHA
standards do n o t, however, re g u la te some of the ta s k s , equipment, and opera
tio n s th a t are s p e c ific to the p recast concrete products in d u stry , such as
forming, s t r e s s i n g , detensio n in g, o i l i n g , concrete tra n s p o rt and c a s tin g .
Existing i n te r n a tio n a l standards and tra d e a s s o c ia tio n guid elines address
many of the hazards th a t are unique to tasks in the p re ca st concrete indus
t r y . PCI provides g u id elin e s fo r worker p ro te c tio n in such areas as ten
sioning, a r c h i t e c t u r a l and s t r u c t u r a l product sto ra g e , yard layout and
c le a n lin e s s , product shipping, and s te e l placement. ACPA guid elines address
the areas of pipe handling and unloading.
The recommendations fo r safe work p ra c tic e s in Chapter IV include app licable
standards from OSHA and fo reign sources and from trade a s s o c ia tio n
g u id elin e s. Additional recommendations are presented to include:
o Employee tra in in g
o Manual m a teria ls handling
o Housekeeping
o Personal p ro te c tiv e equipment.
121
TABLE B - l
OSHA STANDARDS THAT IMPACT ON THE MANUFACTURE AND DELIVERY
OF PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS
A p p l ic a b l e
S ta n d a r d A re a o f Im p act
1910
Subpart D Walking and Working Surfaces
. 22 General requirements
.23 Guarding openings & holes
.24 Fixed s t a i r s
.25 Wood ladders
.26 Metal ladders
.27 Fixed ladders
.28 Scaffolding
.29 Mobile sc a ffo ld s
Subpart E Means of Egress
.36 General
.37 Means of egress
Subpart G Occupational Health and Environmental Control
.94 V e n tila tio n
.95 Noise
.97 Nonionizing r a d ia tio n
Subpart H Hazardous M aterials
.101 Compressed gases
(general requirements)
.102 Acetylene
.104 Oxygen
.106 Flammable and combustible
l iq u id s
.1 1 0 Storage and handling of
liq u e f ie d petroleum gases
Subpart I Personal P ro te c tiv e Equipment
.133 Eye and face p ro te c tio n
.134 R espiratory p ro te c tio n
.135 Occupational head
p ro te c tio n
.136 Occupational foot
p ro te c tio n
Subpart J General Environmental Controls
.141 S an ita tio n
.144 Color coding
.145 Signs and tags
122
TABLE B - l
OSHA STANDARDS THAT IMPACT ON THE MANUFACTURE AND DELIVERY
OF PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS ( C o n tin u e d )
A p p l ic a b l e
S ta n d a r d A re a o f Im p act
1910 (Cont.)
Subpart K Medical and F i r s t Aid
.151 Medical se rv ice s and
f i r s t aid
Subpart L F ire P ro te c tio n
.157 P ortable f i r e
e x tin g u ish e rs
.158 Standpipe & hose systems
.159 Automatic sp rin k le r
systems
.160 Fixed dry chemical
exting u ish ing systems
.161 Carbon dioxide
exting u ish ing systems
.163 Local f i r e alarm
sig n alin g systems
Subpart M Compressed Gas and Compressed Air Equipment
.166 Inspection of compressed
gas cy lin d e rs
.169 Air re c e iv e rs
Subpart N M aterials Handling and Storage
.176 Handling m a te r ia ls ,
general
.178 Powered i n d u s t r i a l trucks
.179 Overhead & gantry cranes
.180 Crawler, locomotive, and
truck cranes
Subpart 0 Machinery and Machine Guarding
.212 General requirements for
a l l machines
.213 Woodworking machinery
requirements
.215 Abrasive wheel machinery
.217 Mechanical power presses
.219 Mechanical power-
transm ission apparatus
123
TABLE B - l
OSHA STANDARDS THAT IMPACT ON THE MANUFACTURE AND DELIVERY
OF PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS ( C o n tin u e d )
Applicable
Standard Area of Impact
1910 (Cont.)
Subpart P Tools, Hand and P ortable Powered
.242 Hand & p o rta b le powered
to o ls & equipment, general
.243 Guarding of p o rta b le
powered to o ls
.244 Other p o rta b le to o ls & equipment
Subpart Q Welding, C utting and Brazing
.252 Welding, c u ttin g & brazing
Subpart S E lectrical
.309 National E l e c t r i c a l Code
Subpart Z Toxic and Hazardous Substances
.1000 Air contaminants
1926
Subpart C General Safety and Health
.21 Safety t r a in i n g & education
.25 Housekeeping
Subpart E Personal P ro te c tiv e Equipment
.102 Eye and face p ro te c tio n
.103 R espiratory p ro te c tio n
.104 Safety b e l t s , l i f e l in e s ,
and lanyards
.105 Safety h a ts
Subpart G Signs, S ig nals, and Barricades
.201 Signaling
Subpart H M aterials Handling, Storage, Use, and Disposal
.250 General Storage
.251 Rigging equipment
.252 Disposal of waste m a te ria ls
Subpart K E lectrical
.400 General
.4012 Grounding and bonding
.402 I n s t a l l a t i o n & maintenance
124
TABLE B - l
OSHA STANDARDS THAT IMPACT ON THE MANUFACTURE AND DELIVERY
OF PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS (C o n c lu d e d )
A p p lic a b le
S ta n d a r d A re a o f Im p act
1926 (Cont.)
Subpart N Cranes, D erricks, and Hoists
.550 Cranes and d e rric k s
Subpart 0 Motor Vehicles
.600 Equipment
.601 Motor v eh icle s
.602 M aterials handling equipment
Subpart Q Concrete, Concrete Forms, and Storage
.700 General pro vision s
.701 Forms and sto rin g
Subpart W Rollover P ro te c tiv e S tru c tu re s
.1000 Rollover p ro te c tio n
.1001 Performance c r i t e r i a
.1002 Frame t e s t procedures
.1003 Overhead p ro te c tio n
Adapted from OSHA General Industry Standards, 29 CFR 1910 [32] and OSHA Con-
s t r u c ti o n Industry Standards, 29 CFR 1926 [51].
125
APPENDIX C
SAMPLE SAFETY AUDIT
A. ORGANIZATION & ADMINISTRATION
Activity Poor
5. D i r e c t m a n a g e m e n t No m e a s u r a b l e acti
involvement vity.
SAMPLE SAFETY AUDIT
4. Skin contamination Little attempt at Partial, but incom The majority of All workmen informed
control control or elimina plete program for workmen instructed about skin-irritating
tion of skin irrita protecting workers. concerning skin- materials. Workmen
tion exposures. First-aid reports irritating mate in all cases provided
on skin problems rials. Workmen pro with approved per
are followed up on vided with approved sonal protective
an individual basis personal protective equipment or devices.
for determination equipment or de Use of proper equip
of cause. vices. Use of this ment enforced &
equipment is en facilities available
forced. for maintenance.
Workers are encour
aged to wash skin
frequently. Injury
record indicates good
control.
5. Fire control Do not meet minimum Meets minimum re In addition to In addition to "Good"
measures insurance or munici quirements. "Fair" additional a fire crew is or
pal requirements. fire hoses i/or ex ganized & trained in
tinguishers are pro emergency procedures
vided. Welding per & in the use of fire
mits issued. Extin fighting equipment.
guishers on all
welding carts.
6. Waste— trash col Control measures Some controls exist Most waste disposal Waste disposal haz
lection & disposal, are inadequate. for disposal of problems have been ards are effectively
air/water pollution harmful wastes or identified & control controlled. Air/
trash. Controls programs instituted. water pollution po
exist but are inef There is no room for tential is m i n i m a l .
fective in methods further improvement.
or procedures of
collection & disposal.
Further study is
necessary.
SAMPLE SAFETY AUDIT (Continued)
D. SUPERVISORY PARTICIPATION, MOTIVATION & TRAINING
Activity Poor Fair Good Excellent
1. Line supervisor All supervisors have All shop supervisors All supervisors In addition, special
safety training not received basic have received some participate in divi ized sessions con
safety training. safety training. sion safety training ducted on specific
session a minimum of problems.
twice a year.
3. Job hazard analysis No written program. JHA program being JHA conducted on In addition, job ha
(JHA). implemented on some majority of opera zard analyses per
jobs. tions . formed on a regular
basis & safety pro
cedures written &
posted for all oper
ations .
4. Training for spe Inadequate training An occasional train Safety training is In addition to "Good
cialized operations given for special ing program given given for all spe an evaluation is per
(Fork trucks, grind ized operations. for specialized cialized operations formed annually to
ing, press brakes, operations. on a regular basis determine training
punch presses, sol & retraining given needs.
vent handling, etc.) periodically to re
view correct proce
dures.
5. Internal self No written program Plant relies on out A written program Inspection program i
inspection. to identify & eval side sources; i.e., outlining inspection measured by results;
uate hazardous Insurance Safety guidelines, respons i.e., reduction in
practices &/or con Engineer & assumes ibilities, frequency accidents & costs.
ditions . each supervisor in & follow up is in Inspection results
spects his area. effect. are followed by top
management.
6. Safety promotion & Bulletin boards & Additional safety Safety displays & Special display cab
publicity. posters are consid displays, demonstra demonstrations are inets, windows, etc.
ered the primary tions, films, are used on a regular are provided. Dis
means for safety used infrequently. basis. plays are. used regu
promotion. larly & are keyed to
special themes.
SAMPLE SAFETY AUDIT (Continued)
D. SUPERVISORY PARTICIPATION, MOTIVATION & TRAINING (Continued)
Activity Poor Fair Good Excellent
7. Employee/supervisor Little or no attempt Infrequent safety Supervisors regu In addition to items
safety contact & made by supervisor discussions between larly cover safety covered under "Good"
communication. to discuss safety supervisor & employ when reviewing work supervisors make good
with employees. ees. practices with in use of the shop safe
dividual employees. ty plan & regularly
review job safety
requirements with each
worker. They contact
at least one employee
daily to discuss safe
job performance.
2. Accident cause & No analysis of dis Effective analysis In addition to ef Accident causes & in
injury location abling & medical by b o t h cause & fective accident juries are graphical
analysis & statis cases to identify location maintained analysis, results ly illustrated to de
tics. prevalent causes of on m e d i c a l & first are used to pinpoint velop the trends &
accidents & location aid cases. accident causes so evaluate performance.
where they occur. accident prevention Management is kept
objectives can be informed on status.
established.
4. Proper reporting of Accident reporting Accidents are cor In addition to In addition to "Good"
accidents & contact procedures are in rectly reported on a "Fair" accident re there is a close li
with carrier. adequate . timely basis. cords are maintained aison with the insur
for analysis pur ance carrier.
poses________________
RATING FORM
Poor F air Good E x cellent Comments
ORGANIZATION & ADMINISTRATION
1. Statement of policy,
r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s assigned. 0 5 15 20
2. Safe operating procedures
(SOP's). 0 2 15 17
3. Employee s e le c tio n and
placement. 0 2 10 12
4. Emergency and d i s a s t e r
c ontrol planning. 0 5 15 18
5. D irect management in
volvement . 0 10 20 25
6. Plant safety ru le s . 0 2 5 8
Total value of c ir c le d numbers + + + 20 Rating
B. INDUSTRIAL HAZARD CONTROL
1. Housekeeping— storage of
m a te r ia ls , e tc . 0 4 8 10
2. Machine guarding. 0 5 16 20
3. General area guarding. 0 5 16 20
4. Maintenance of equipment
guards, hand to o ls, e tc . 0 5 16 20
5. M aterial handling—hand
and mechanized. 0 3 8 10
6. Personal p ro te c tiv e equip
ment—adequacy and use. 0 7 20 20
Total value of c ir c le d numbers + + + 20 Rating
C. FIRE CONTROL & INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
1. Chemical hazard control
re fe re n c e s. 0 6 17 20
2. Flammable and explosive
m a teria ls con tro l. 0 6 17 20
3. V e n tila tio n — fumes, smoke
and dust c o n tro l. 0 2 8 10
4. Skin contamination c o n tro l. 0 3 10 15
5. F ire con tro l measures. 0 2 8 10
6. Waste— tra sh c o lle c tio n and
d isp o sa l, a ir/w a te r
p o llu t io n . 0 7 20 25
Total value of c ir c le d numbers 20 Rating
134
Poor F air Good E xcellent Comments
D. SUPERVISORY PARTICIPATION, MOTIVATION & TRAINING
1 . Line supervisor safety
training. 0 10 22 25
2. In d o c trin a tio n of new
employees. 0 1 5 10
3. Job hazard a n a ly s is. 0 2 8 10
4. Training for sp e cia liz e d
o p e ra tio n s . 0 2 7 10
5. In te rn a l s e lf - in s p e c tio n . 0 5 14 15
6. Safety promotion and
p u b lic ity . 0 1 4 5
7. Employee/supervisor contact
and communication. 0 5 20 25
Total value of c ir c le d numbers ____ +_____ +____ +____ X .20 Rating
E. ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION, STATISTICS & REPORTING PROCEDURES
1. Accident in v e s tig a tio n by
lin e supervisor. 0 10 32 40
2. Accident cause and injury
loc a tio n analysis and
statistics. 0 3 8 10
3. In v e s tig a tio n of property
damage. 0 10 32 40
4. Proper rep ortin g of accidents
and contact with c a r r i e r . 0 3 8 10
Total value of c ir c le d numbers ____ +____ +____ + X .20 Rating
SUMMARY
The numerical values below are the weighted ra tin g s c a lc u la te d on r a tin g
sh eets. The t o t a l becomes the o v e ra ll score for the lo c a tio n .
A. Organization & Adm inistration ___________
B. I n d u s t r i a l Hazard Control
C. Fire Control & I n d u s tr ia l Hygiene ___________
D. Supervisory P a r ti c ip a ti o n ,
Motivation & Training
E. Accident In v e s tig a tio n , S t a t i s t i c s
& Reporting Procedures
TOTAL RATING ___________
Copyright by the American Society of Safety Engineers. Reprinted by the
Department of Health and Human Services with permission. F urther
reproduction without permission of copyright holder p ro h ib ite d .
135
APPENDIX D
EXAMPLES OF SAFETY PROGRAM ASSESSMENT FORMS
A c c id e n t I n v e s t i g a t i o n A s se ssm e n t Form
Yes No
1. Are employees required to re p o rt a l l i n j u r i e s and _____ ___
property damage incidents?
2. Do the accident in v e s tig a tio n procedures urge employees _____ ___
to re p o rt near miss accidents?
3. Are f i r s t - l i n e supervisors required to in v e s tig a te _____ ___
and rep ort minor inju ry accidents?
4. Is a w ritte n record made of a l l accident in v e stig a tio n s? _____ ___
5. Does a management lev el above the f i r s t - l i n e supervisor
p a r ti c ip a t e in serio us injury accidents?
6. Are the m ajority of accid en ts in v e stig a te d on the day
of the occurrence?
7. Have s u p e r v i s o r been tra in e d in techniques of accident
in v e stig a tio n ?
8. Do accident re p o rts c le a r ly id e n tify the cause(s) of
the accident?
9. Are recommendations for c o rre c tiv e a c tio n to prevent
recurrence implemented in a timely manner?
10. Is someone assigned the r e s p o n s i b il i ty of keeping OSHA
records, and are they kept up to date?
138
A s se ss m e n t f o r C o n tr o l o f H a z a rd s Form
Yes No
1. Is safety and h ea lth data re a d ily a v a ila b le to a l l _____ ___
employees?
2. Are m a teria l safety data sheets a v a ila b le to supervisors? _____ ___
3. Are safe job procedures and safety ru le s a v a ila b le to _____ ___
a l l employees?
4. Are ro u tin e sa fe ty and h ea lth inspections conducted? _____ ___
5. Is there a procedure for handling employee sa fe ty and
health complaints?
6. Are noted safety d e f ic ie n c ie s promptly corrected?
7. Is there an engineering and a d m in istra tiv e con tro l
program in e ffe c t?
8. Is management knowledgeable in the s e le c tio n , care and
maintenance of personal p ro te c tiv e equipment?
9. Are employees in s tru c te d in the c o rre c t use and care
of personal p ro te c tiv e equipment?
10. Is there a program in e f f e c t for good housekeeping and
and ro u tin e maintenance?
139
A s s e s s m e n t o f S a f e t y I n s p e c t i o n Form
Yes No
1. Does the safety program provide for p erio d ic sa fe ty and _____ ___
h ealth inspections?
2. Are ind ivid uals assigned r e s p o n s i b il i ty for conducting _____
inspections?
3. Do management and employees conduct jo i n t inspections? _____ ___
4. Does management have an abatement program in e f f e c t? _____
5. Does the insp ectio n cover m a te ria ls storage and m a te ria l _____ ___
handling?
6. Does the in sp ectio n cover housekeeping in general and
and p a r t i c u l a r l y for walking and working surfaces?
7. Does the inspection cover the use, care and maintenance
of personal p ro te c tiv e equipment?
8. Does the insp ectio n cover access and e x it to work areas?
9. Does the insp ectio n cover use, care and maintenance of ______
hand too ls (powered and unpowered)?
10. Does the insp ectio n cover physical and chemical hazards?
140
A s se s sm e n t o f S a f e t y T r a i n i n g Form
Yes No
1. Are a l l new employees given a safety o r i e n t a t i o n before _____ ___
they s t a r t work?
2. Are employees, old or new, provided with sa fe ty job _____ ___
in s tr u c tio n when assigned to a new job?
3. Is the tra in in g d ir e c te d to the sp e c ific hazards of the _____ ___
new job?
4. Has management i d e n ti f i e d those persons resp o nsib le for _____ ___
tr a in i n g employees?
5. Are sa fe ty ru le s and p r a c tic e s p e r io d ic a lly discussed
with a l l employees?
6. Is a p ortio n of each sa fe ty meeting devoted to providing
safety in s t r u c t io n fo r upcoming work?
7. Have sa fe ty tra in in g r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s been assigned to
someone?
8. Are tra in in g p r i o r i t i e s being assessed? _____ ___
9. Are the tr a in in g o b je c tiv e s c le a r ly defined? _____
10. Is the tra in in g program p e r io d ic a lly evaluated?
141
A s se ssm e n t o f S a f e t y A t t i t u d e Form
Yes No
1. Do supervisors observe s ta te d safety ru le s and safe job _____ ___
procedures?
2. Do employees perceive management as doing a good job a t _____ ___
c o rre c tin g reported unsafe conditions?
3. Are employees given the opportunity to take an a c tiv e ______ ___
ro le in the sa fe ty program?
4. Are plant safety ru le s posted and made a v a ila b le to a l l _____ ___
employees?
5. Are reasons for the sa fe ty ru le s explained to the
employees?
6. Does management re in fo rc e safe employee behavior?
7. Are noncooperative employees reprimanded for in f r a c tio n s
of plant safety ru le s and p ra ctic es?
8. Does management support supervisor e f f o r t s to enforce
p lan t safety ru le s and p ra c tic e s?
9. Do employees fe e l th a t management is in t e r e s t e d and
involved in the safety program?
10. Does management feel th a t the employees are i n te r e s te d
and involved in the sa fe ty program?
142
A s s e s s m e n t o f S a fe Work P r o c e d u r e s Form
Yes No
1. Have accident re p e a te r jobs been i d e n ti f i e d and analyzed _____ ___
to develop sa fe r procedures?
2. Have safe job procedures been standardized fo r hazardous _____
jobs?
3. Are hazardous tasks covered by w ritte n safe job pro- _____ ___
cedures?
4. Do supervisors develop w r it t e n safe job procedures?
5. Are employees encouraged to p a r t i c i p a t e in development
of w ritte n safe job procedures?
6. Are w ritte n safe job procedures prepared p r io r to
i n i t i a t i o n of new jobs or tasks?
7. Do supervisors p e r io d ic a lly observe hazardous jobs or
tasks to determine i f safe work procedures are being
u t i l iz e d ?
8. Are hazardous jobs or tasks accomplished the same by a l l
work crews or s h if ts ?
9. Are w ritte n safe job procedures used to t r a i n employees?
10. Are w ritte n safe job procedures p e r io d ic a lly updated
for improving work methods?
143
A ss e s sm e n t o f M an a g e m e n t's P a r t i c i p a t i o n i n S a f e t y Form
Yes No
1. Is the p lan t sa fe ty program a topic on the manager's _____ ___
s t a f f meeting agenda?
2. Do middle managers p e r io d ic a lly conduct sa fe ty meetings _____ ___
with subordinate supervisors?
3. Do middle managers conduct safety insp ectio ns? _____ ___
4. Does the p lan t manager review p erio d ic re p o rts of _____ ___
p lan t accidents?
5. Does management promptly c o rre c t unsafe conditions? _____ ___
6. Does management encourage employees to re p o rt hazardous _____ ___
conditions?
7. Does management encourage employee safety suggestions? _____
8. Does the p lan t have procedures for handling emergencies? _____ ___
9. Do members of management observe the p l a n t 's s ta te d
sa fe ty ru le s and p ra c tic e s?
10. Are a l l le v e ls of managers held accountable fo r t h e i r _____ ___
sa fe ty r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s ?
Summary
The assessment forms address samples of various questions which may be asked
concerning the safety program. The questions presented on the sample forms
are not intended to re p re se n t the most important to be answered. They are
intended to be examples o n ly . Management may d e s ir e to find answers to
other areas of the sa fe ty program which are considered problem areas and
should develop an assessment to o l which would y ie ld those answers.
Adapted from Evaluation of Safety and Health Program and Operation Zero
Accident Prevention Fundamentals [45,47].
144
GLOSSARY
146
l i f t i n g frame A device designed to provide two or more l i f t i n g p oin ts
(or spreader of a p re ca st concrete element with p re d ic ta b le load d i s
beam) t r i b u t i o n and prearranged d ir e c t io n of p u llin g force
during l i f t i n g .
machine-cast Products c a st by one or more machines s p e c i f i c a l l y design
products ed for the purpose. Slipform and ex tru sio n machines are
types of casting equipment used to make so lid or
hollow-core sla b s.
machine fin ish F inishes applied by sp e cia l to o ls while the concrete is
s t i l l in the forms and p l a s t i c .
no-slump concrete Concrete with a near-zero slump to be used with sp e cia l
c o n so lid a tio n methods, tamping, or e x tru sio n production
equipment.
p recast concrete A concrete element c a st in a lo c a tio n o th er than i t s
f i n a l p o s itio n in se rv ic e . P recast concrete may be
produced a t the job s i t e , in temporary p la n ts , or in
permanent f a c t o r i e s .
precast concrete A general term for any p re ca st product re g ard le ss of
element c l a s s i f i c a t i o n or a p p lic a tio n . The term includes any
nonconcrete items incorporated in the element a t the time
of manufacture.
p re s tre s s in g bed The platform and abutments needed to support the forms
and m aintain the tendons in a s tre s s e d condition during
placing and curing of the concrete.
re ta r d e r An admixture th a t delays the s e t ti n g of concrete p aste.
screeding The smoothing or lev e lin g o ff of fresh ly c a st concrete by
manual or mechanical means. A screed u sually has a
wooden or metal edge th a t is moved h o r iz o n ta lly across
the con crete, pushing excess m a te ria l in fron t of i t and
f i l l i n g in low places.
self-stressing Equipment t h a t , in ad d itio n to serving as forms for con
forms c r e t e , accommodates the pretensioned strands (or w ires)
and su sta in s the t o t a l p re s tre s s in g force by s u ita b le end
bulkheads and s u f f i c i e n t c r o s s - s e c tio n a l stre n g th .
slump The drop from the top of a slump cone to the top of the
unsupported concrete a f t e r the sudden removal of the
supporting slump cone. The d iffe re n c e in h e ig h t,
measured in inches or c e ntim eters, is the slump of the
concrete. A wet or s o ft mix slumps more than a dry or
s t i f f mix.
147
strand chuck A device for holding a strand under tension,
or v ise
s trip p in g The process of removing a p re ca st concrete element from
the form in which i t was c a s t.
two-blocking The a c tio n of the crane hook block being pulled in to the
crane boom head.
water/cement The weight of water r e l a t i v e to the weight of cement in a
ratio concrete mix. Enough water must be added to the mix to
provide h ydration. Excess water improves w ork ability but
reduces stre n g th .
148
tV U .S . GOVERNMENT P R IN T IN G O F F IC E 1 9 8 4 — 7 5 9 - 1 0 3 / 1 0 4 2
DEPARTM EN T OF HEALTH AND HUMAN S E R V IC E S
PUBLIC HEA LTH SERVIC E
C E N T E R S F O R D IS E A S E C O N T R O L
N A T IO N A L IN S T IT U T E FO R O C C U P A T IO N A L S A F E T Y AND H E A L T H
R O B E R T A . T A F T L A B O R A T O R IE S
4676 C O LU M B IA P A R K W A Y , C IN C IN N A T I, OHIO 45226