Moten v. West
Moten v. West
Moten v. West
“Plaintiff”) and states its Complaint against Defendants YE f/k/a Kanye West (“West”), UMG
Recordings, Inc. a/k/a Universal Music Group (“UMG Recordings”), Def Jam Recordings, a
division of UMG Recordings, Inc. (“Def Jam”), and Getting Out Our Dreams, Inc. a/k/a
I. THE PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Bishop David Paul Moten is a resident of Texas who does business in
2. Defendant West is a musician who writes, produces, and performs under the UMG
1
Recordings and G.O.O.D. Music labels.
Case 3:22-cv-00991-K Document 1 Filed 05/03/22 Page 2 of 9 PageID 2
3. Defendant UMG Recordings is a record company that owns the Def Jam
Recordings music label and sublabel of Def Jam Recordings, G.O.O.D. Music.
4. Defendant Def Jam Recordings is a music label founded in or around 1983. Def
6. The claims at issue in this case arise under § 106 of the Copyright Act (Title 17 of
7. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section
1338(a) of Title 28 of the United States Code, which provides the federal district courts shall have
original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, plant
variety protection, copyrights and trademarks. Such jurisdiction shall be exclusive of the courts of
8. The Court has personal jurisdiction over all the Defendants as they have
purposefully availed themselves of doing business in Texas via internet sales and otherwise,
including sales of the sound recording in question, of which all shared in the benefits, and because
Defendants purposefully misappropriated Plaintiff’s sound recording which was created in Texas
2
because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims in the instant action
Case 3:22-cv-00991-K Document 1 Filed 05/03/22 Page 3 of 9 PageID 3
10. On or about August 29, 2021, West’s album, Donda, was released. The album
includes the sound recording “Come to Life”, which was produced by West, Jeff Bhasker, Warryn
11. The sound recording “Come to Life” contains repeated, unauthorized, unlicensed
samples from the sound recording of a sermon delivered and owned by Plaintiff (the “Sermon”).
12. The sound recording “Come to Life” includes the following repeated, unauthorized,
[Intro]
[Chorus]
Here Go All Your Problems Again (I Thank God)
Three, Two, One, You're Pain (I Thank God)
Uncle Now He Back In The Pain (Hallelujah)
Auntie Shut Down Again
Did She Finally Come To Life?
(Thank You, Jesus)
Ever Wish You Had Another Life?
Ever Wish You Had Another Life?
Ever Wish You Had Another Life?
[Verse 1]
[Interlude]
[Pre-Chorus]
[Chorus]
[Verse 2]
13. “Come to Life” is approximately five minutes and ten seconds (5:10) in length.
Approximately one minute and ten seconds (1:10) of this sound recording is sampled directly from
Plaintiff’s sermon and appears to run on a loop underscoring the pre-chorus and chorus throughout
the song in question. Consequently, no twenty percent (20%)of the entire sound recording “Come
14. Defendants willfully and without the permission or consent of Plaintiff extensively
sampled portions of the Sermon. Over the span of several years, Defendants have demonstrated an
alarming pattern and practice of willfully and egregiously sampling sound recordings of others without
consent or permission.
5
16. Plaintiff has exclusive rights, title and license to the Sermon, as well as the sole
Case 3:22-cv-00991-K Document 1 Filed 05/03/22 Page 6 of 9 PageID 6
right and license to reproduce, distribute, record or authorize the recording of sounds related to the
the sounds recorded and owned by Plaintiff when Defendants wrongfully and without a license or
18. Defendants knowingly produced, manufactured, distributed, and sold the sound
recording of “Come to Life” with knowledge that the recording contained unauthorized samples
of the Sermon.
20. The conduct of Defendants was wanton, reckless, and/or malicious to Plaintiff so as
21. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants for
amount to be determined by the trier of fact in this case, plus statutory fines, costs,interest and
expenses.
23. In a violation of statutory and common law, Defendants have wrongfully used and
exploited Plaintiff’s sound recording, production, and other property rights and unjustly reaped
6
tremendous financial and other benefits in violation of Plaintiff’s legal rights and under
Case 3:22-cv-00991-K Document 1 Filed 05/03/22 Page 7 of 9 PageID 7
circumstances where Defendants have been unjustly enriched by wrongfully deriving profit and
24. Defendants have seen a considerable influx of ill-gotten financial gains and other
benefits as a direct consequence of their wrongful use of Plaintiff’s sound recording and
production, and other violations of Plaintiff’s rights. Consequently, Defendants therefore hold
money which in equity and good conscience belongs to the Plaintiff. Plaintiff has also suffered
25. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff requests an award of the disgorgedprofits of the
27. Defendants wrongfully deprived and interfered with rights, interests, and property
of Plaintiff by sampling portions of the sound recording and using Plaintiff’s production of the
Sermon, selling and distributing or allowing the distribution of these samples, and retaining the
profits and monies derived from the sale of albums containing the sound recording “Come to
Life.”
28. The conduct of Defendants was wanton, reckless, and/or malicious to Plaintiff so
29. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff hereby demands judgment against Defendants for
amount to be determined by the trier of fact in this case, plus costs, interest and expenses.
7
COUNTDocument
Case 3:22-cv-00991-K IV – COMMON LAW
1 Filed COPYRIGHT
05/03/22 Page 8 of 9 PageID 8
31. The Plaintiff has common law copyrights in the sound recording and the production
thereof referenced above. The Defendants violated said rights by the unauthorized use and copying
32. The conduct of Defendants was wanton, reckless, and/or malicious to Plaintiff so
33. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants for
amount to be determined by the trier of fact in this case, plus costs, interest and expenses.
JURY DEMAND
34. Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all allegations, claims, and requests for relief
PRAYER
to appear and answer and that upon trial of this cause Plaintiff recovers all relief requested herein,
including all actual, direct, indirect, incidental, and consequential damages, along with attorney’s
fees, costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest at the highest rate allowable by law, and for such
other and further relief, both at law and in equity, to which Plaintiff may be justly entitled.
8
Respectfully submitted,
Case 3:22-cv-00991-K Document 1 Filed 05/03/22 Page 9 of 9 PageID 9
SMITH & SMITH LAW GROUP, PLLC
2828 Market Loop, Suite 100
Southlake, Texas 76092
Kanye West
c/o Def Jam Records, Inc.
CT Corporation System
1755 Broadway
New York, NY 10019
G.O.O.D. Music
Maximilian Jo
6 Centerpointe Drive, Suite 620
La Palma, CA 90623