International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2021

Vol. 5, Issue 12, ISSN No. 2455-2143, Pages 227-230

Published Online April 2021 in IJEAST (http://www.ijeast.com)

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF MULTI STOREY

BUILDING WITH AND WITHOUT SHEAR
WALL
Sarwan Gupta Shubham Gaikar Kewal Patil Swapnil Shelar Harshad Thakare
Department of Civil Department of Civil Department of Civil Department of Civil Department of Civil
JSPM’s Imperial Vishwatmak Om Vishwatmak Om Vishwatmak Om Vishwatmak Om
College of Engineering Gurudev College of Gurudev College of Gurudev College of Gurudev College of
and Research, Engineering, Engineering, Engineering Engineering,
Wagholi, Maharashtra Shahapur, Shahapur, Shahapur, Shahapur,
India Maharashtra, India Maharashtra, India Maharashtra, India Maharashtra, India

Abstract— Nowadays, the number of buildings is resist lateral loads and wind, and it helps to improve the
constructed and designed according to the requirements seismic response of buildings. In the past few decades, due to
and aesthetic viewpoints of the buildings every day. Most insufficient lateral rigidity and the strength of structural
buildings are constructed in a certain spatial members to resist earthquakes, eventually leading to collapse,
configuration, such as X-shaped, V-shaped, and the x and multi-storey buildings have been widely constructed.
y coordinates are not parallel to the structure. The Reinforced concrete shear wall is most suitable for
earthquake caused more damage to the different construction in areas prone to high earthquake zone, because it
structures of the building. The main problem is the provides sufficient rigid connection between structural
slenderness ratio. The main purpose of this project is to elements and avoids many hazards to buildings. The seismic
compare the dynamic characteristics of buildings with performance of a building depends on the location of the shear
different structural configurations in seismic zones and soil wall in the building. Many research papers do not mention the
types. In this study, a 12-story space configuration exact location of the shear wall in the building to improve the
structure was considered, and the height of 3m on each maximum rigidity and strength against lateral forces.
floor did not exceed 36m, with shear walls and supports at
different positions of the building. The dynamic behaviour 1.1. SHEAR WALL
of buildings in all seismic zones of magnitude III and on In terms of structural engineering, a shear wall is a
different types of soil (such as media) is studied. The structural system that consists of support panels (also called
structure has peripheral beams that carry RC shear walls shear panels) to resist the influence of lateral loads acting on
with a thickness of 230 mm. The response spectrum the structure. The shear wall is the vertical element of the
analysis was carried out by using software of ETABS horizontal force resistance system.
version.
Keywords— Earthquake, Shear wall, Response Spectrum 1.2. FUNCTION OF SHEAR WALL
Analysis
Giving Lateral Strength to building:
Shear Wall should give parallel shear solidarity to the
I. INTRODUCTION structure to oppose the even seismic tremor powers, wind
Most countries suffer from earthquake damage, powers and move these powers to the establishment.
which is one of the main impacts on buildings. Generally, the Giving Lateral Stiffness to building:
loads on the building are horizontal loads and vertical loads. Shear Walls give enormous firmness to working
Horizontal loads are wind loads and seismic loads. The toward their direction, which lessens horizontal influence of
vertical load is the self-weight and applied load of all the structure and consequently decreases harm to structure.
structural members. Shear walls are the most effective way to

227
 International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2021
Vol. 5, Issue 12, ISSN No. 2455-2143, Pages 227-230
Published Online April 2021 in IJEAST (http://www.ijeast.com)

1.3. ADVANTAGES OF SHEAR WALL

 Very good earthquake performance, if proper

designed.
 Easy to construct.
 Minimizing earthquake damage to structural and non-
structural elements.
 Lesser lateral displacements than frames.

1.4 LATERAL LOAD RESISTING SYSTEM

Fig 1: Building without Fig 2: Building with
Built up Concrete Shear Wall: Shear wall Shear wall
Shear divider is a best horizontal burden opposing
framework in tall structure at high seismic zone regions. It is a IV. INPUT PARAMETERS
solid cantilever divider gave in a RC outline working to give
flexural solidness and solidarity to the primary individuals
against seismic tremor. Development of shear divider in Table-1: Input Parameters
building is practical simply up to restricted stories. Shear Particulars Dimensions
divider will give unbending association among divider and
casing individuals and it is typically given in lift center, step Beam Size 230mm X 450mm
case and rather than traditional burden bearing dividers. Column Size 230mm X 400mm
Bracing System: Spacing between the frame 3m
Supporting is a generally productive and prudent Floor dimension in X-direction 15m
sidelong burden opposing framework in tall structure both of
steel or R.C edge to give better execution against tremor Floor Dimension in Y-direction 15m
various kinds of bracings are accessible like single slanting
propping, twofold corner to corner propping, K supporting, V-
bracing and Knee supporting are accessible. Table-2: Loading Conditions
Load Type Value
II.OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
Live load on floor 2 kN/m2
1. To analyze the given multi storied building using
response spectrum method with and without shear Live load on Terrace 1.5 kN/m2
wall. Floor Finish 1.5 kN/m2
2. To study the behaviour of the structure under Water Proofing on Terrace 3 kN/m2
different locations of shear wall.
3. To analyze and compare the results of story drift and
story displacement for with and without shear wall. Table-3: Seismic Parameters
Load Type Value
III.METHODOLOGY
Seismic Zone III
Dynamic analysis by Response Spectrum Method of
G+11 multi storey building with and without shear walls Zone Factor 0.16
using ETABS software. Two models are considered
namely shear wall and without shear wall. The shear walls Response Reduction Factor, R 5
are placed at corner of the building. The structure is Soil type II, Medium
analyzed for seismic analysis as per IS 1893:2016. Typical
floor plan is shown below. Importance Factor 1

228
 International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2021
Vol. 5, Issue 12, ISSN No. 2455-2143, Pages 227-230
Published Online April 2021 in IJEAST (http://www.ijeast.com)

V. RESULTS B. Lateral Storey Drift

The storey drift observes for a value of shear wall due to
Two Parameters such as Storey Displacement and Storey Drift response spectrum analysis in X- direction is 0.000245 and
are compared in this study. without shear wall is 0.000334 at the top. Therefore, a
A. Lateral Storey Displacement reduction up to 26.64% is observed.

The maximum storey displacement observes for a value of

shear wall due to response spectrum analysis in X- direction is
11.419mm and without shear wall is 17.414mm at the top.
Therefore, a reduction up to 34.42% can be observed.

Also, the storey drift observes for a value of shear

wall due to response spectrum analysis in Y- direction is
0.00033 and without shear wall is 0.000277 at the top.
Therefore, a reduction up to 45.37% is observed.
Also, the maximum storey displacement observes for a
value of shear wall due response spectrum analysis in Y-
direction is 13.262mm and without shear wall is 22.078mm at
the top. Therefore, a reduction up to 39.93% is observed.

VI. CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions were made from the present study:
 The maximum storey displacement reduction of
response spectrum analysis in X-direction is 34.42 %.

229
 International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2021
Vol. 5, Issue 12, ISSN No. 2455-2143, Pages 227-230
Published Online April 2021 in IJEAST (http://www.ijeast.com)

 The maximum storey displacement reduction of [10] Chandurkar P. and Dr. Pajgade P. (2013), “Seismic
response spectrum analysis in Y-direction is 39.93 %. Analysis of RCC Building with and Without Shear Wall”
 The storey drift reduction of response spectrum International Journal of Modern Engineering Research
analysis in X-direction is 26.64 %. (IJMER) Vol.3, Issue.3, pp-1805-1810 ISSN: 2249-6645.
 The storey drift reduction of response spectrum [11] Bhunia D. and Ramjiyani B. (2011), “Solution of Shear
analysis in Y-direction is 45.37 %. Wall Location in Multi-Storey Building” International
journal of civil and structural engineering Volume 2, No
2, ISSN 0976 – 4399.
VII. REFERENCES
[12] Verma S. K., Lal R. and Kumar R. (2014), “Seismic
[1] Mahdi H., Ahmed N. and Abdullah A. (2018), “Dynamic response of RC framed buildings” International journal of
Analysis of Multi-Storey Building with Openings in civil and structural engineering, Volume 4.
Shear Wall” International Journal of Emerging Trends in
[13] IS 1893 (Part-I): 2016: Criteria for Earthquake Resistance
Engineering and Development, Issue -8, Vol.5. Design of Structures, New Delhi, India.
[2] N. Prakash, (2018), “Analysis of a multi storied building
with and without shear wall” International Journal for
Research in Engineering Application & Management
(IJREAM) ISSN: 2454-9150, Vol-04, Issue-03.
[3] Wadmare A., Konapure N., Lodha P. and Patil K. (2018),
“Analysis of RC Structure with and without Shear Wall
and Optimum Location of Shear Wall” International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)
e-ISSN: 2395-0056, p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Volume: 05.
[4] Patil S. and Shastri L. (2017), “Dynamic Analysis of
Multi Storied Building with and without Shear Wall and
Bracing” GRD Journals- Global Research and
Development Journal for Engineering, ISSN: 2455-5703,
Volume 2, Issue 9.
[5] Mohd A., Vairagade L. and Nair V. (2015), “Comparative
study on seismic analysis of multi-storey building
stiffened with bracing and shear wall” International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)
e-ISSN: 2395-0056 , p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Volume: 02.
[6] Titiksh A. and Dr. Gupta M. (2015), “A Study of the
Various Structural Framing Systems Subjected to Seismic
Loads” SSRG International Journal of Civil Engineering
(SSRG-IJCE) – volume 2.
[7] Harne V. (2015), “Comparative Study of Strength of RC
Shear Wall at Different Location on Multi-storied
Residential Building” International Journal of Civil
Engineering Research. ISSN 2278-3652 Volume 5,
Number 4, pp. 391-400.
[8] Patil S., Mali M. and Dr. Talikoti R. (2015), “Effect of
Wind Load on High Rise Structure” International Journal
of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) ISSN:
2321-0869 (O) 2454-4698 (P), Volume-3, Issue-7.
[9] Ghalimath A.G, Waghmare Y.M, Zadbuke A.A and
Chaudhari A.R. (2015), “Seismic Comparative Study of
Multi-storied R.C.C Building with Shear Wall in Bare
Frame and Masonry Infill Frame for Various Types of
Soil and Seismic Zones” International Research Journal
of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -
0056 p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Volume: 02 Issue: 05.

230