National Innovation and Start-Up Policy: Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University Maharashtra State
National Innovation and Start-Up Policy: Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University Maharashtra State
National Innovation and Start-Up Policy: Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University Maharashtra State
Website: www.dbatu.ac.in
Preamble
Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar technological University has been at the forefront of promoting
creativity and incubating business ideas in order to provide an atmosphere where its students
and faculty can explore their potential. Members of the faculty are continuously engaged in
the generation and distribution of information, just as students are finding ways to launch
business ideas to influence society and solve problems in the real world.
In many cutting-edge science and technology fields, a significant number of R&D activities
are being carried out by faculty members and students. Most of these research findings,
however do not translate into consumer goods, benefiting society in general, for a variety of
reasons, including the industry's lack of interest in marketing modern and futuristic
innovations.
Therefore, University proposes that interested faculty members and students be encouraged to
open companies, to be on the board of directors of such companies in the capacity of a
director, chairman or any such function. Faculty members are expected to make every effort
to balance their academic responsibilities while assuming the position above.
The University strives to provide an environment where its institutions and its graduates can
achieve the full potential of the best trained youth. When a significant number of its citizens
have access to activities that are in line with their life goals, every culture peaks and this
involves the creation of increasingly complex skills. What lies behind the evolution of culture
is the need to acquire increasingly refined skills.
Executive Summary
This Document addresses a plan of creating and operating an National innovation and start-
up policy for Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, Lonere. It is developed on
the basis of comprehensive surveys on the technology developments, available human
resource of aspiring engineering and technology graduates, and industry trends. The policy
inline with focus of the central government on entrepreneurial projects to leverage the talent
and aspirations of engineering graduates of the University for opportunity creation and wealth
generation while meeting the immediate and future needs of the society and industry alike.
This policy will focus on building a culture, delivering effective teaching, learning,
innovation building, skills and career development , industry connect and social
responsibility initiatives.
Purpose
The mission of the policy is to encourage and support establishment and growth of
technology-based start-ups which can enable students and faculty to innovate and prototype
their potential ideas with industrial standards and support from Government, industry and
reputed academic institutions around the world and help them to realize their potentials
By fulfilling this mission, the framework shall contribute to job creation, improve
employability of graduates, enhance economic health of the region and meet the demands of
the society and industry across the entire State.
UG Students from the host institution Member 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Year Year Year Year
2 2 3 3
PG/ PhD Students 1/2
Special
Patent Expert (Optional) Invitee 1
Creation of pre-incubation and incubation facilities for nurturing innovations and startups in
institutions should be undertaken. Incubation and Innovation need to be organically
interlinked. Without innovation, new enterprises are unlikely to succeed. The goal of the
effort should be to link INNOVATION to ENTREPRISES to FINANCIAL SUCCESS.
a. All Institutions are advised to create facilities within their institution for supporting pre-
incubation (e.g. IICs as per the guidelines by MHRD‟s Innovation Cell, EDC, IEDC, New-
Gen IEDC, Innovation Cell, Startup Cell, Student Clubs, etc.) and Incubation/ acceleration by
mobilizing resources from internal and external sources.
d. Institutions may offer mentoring and other relevant services through Pre-
incubation/Incubation units in-return for fees, equity sharing and (or) zero payment basis. The
modalities regarding Equity Sharing in Startups supported through these units will depend
upon the nature of services offered by these units and are elaborately explained in Section 3.
a. University/Institutes are expected to establish processes and mechanisms for easy creation
and nurturing of Start-ups/enterprises by students (UG, PG, Ph.D.), staff (including
temporary or project staff), faculty, alumni and potential start up applicants even from outside
the institutions.
i. Incubation support: Offer access to pre-incubation & Incubation facility to start ups by
students, staff and faculty for mutually acceptable time-frame.
In case an institute doesn‟t have a dedicated facility/ infrastructure of its own, then it may
reach out to nearest incubation facilities in affiliated institutes/University in order to
facilitate access to their students, staff and faculty.
Or
In case an institute doesn’t have a dedicated facility/ infrastructure of its own, then they
can apply for incubation centre for their institutes.
ii. Will allow licensing of IPR from institute to start up: Ideally students and faculty members
intending to initiate a start up based on the technology developed or co-developed by them or
the technology owned by the institute, should be allowed to take a license on the said
technology on easy term, either in terms of equity in the venture and/ or license fees and/ or
royalty to obviate the early stage financial burden.
iii. Will allow setting up a start up (including social start ups) and working part-time for the
start ups while studying / working: HEIs may allow their students / staff to work on their
innovative projects and setting up start ups (including Social Start ups) or work as intern /
part-time in start ups (incubated in any recognized HEIs/Incubators) while studying /
working. Student Entrepreneurs may earn credits for working on innovative
prototypes/Business Models. Institute may need to develop clear guidelines to formalize this
mechanism. Student inventors may also be allowed to opt for start up in place of their mini
project/ major project, seminars, summer trainings. The area in which student wants to
initiate a start up may be interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary. However, the student must
describe how they will separate and clearly distinguish their ongoing research activities as a
student from the work being conducted at the start up.
Guides for mini project/ major project, and seminars should be allocated according to
the working area/area of interest.
Faculty should encourage the students for the modern emerging technologies.
C. Students who are under incubation, but are pursuing some entrepreneurial ventures while
studying should be allowed to use their address in the institute to register their company with
due permission from the institution.
d. Students entrepreneurs should be allowed to sit for the examination, even if their
attendance is less than the minimum permissible percentage, with due permission from the
institute.
e. University/Institutes should allow their students to take a semester/year break (or even
more depending upon the decision of review committee constituted by the institute) to work
on their start ups and re-join academics to complete the course. Student entrepreneurs may
earn academic credits for their efforts while creating an enterprise. Institute should set up a
review committee for review of start up by students, and based on the progress made, it may
consider giving appropriate credits for academics.
f. The institute should explore provision of accommodation to the entrepreneurs within the
campus for some period of time.
g. Allow faculty and staff to take off for a semester / year (or even more depending upon the
decision of review committee constituted by the institute) as sabbatical/ unpaid leave/ casual
leave/ earned leave for working on startups and come back. Institution should consider
allowing use of its resource to faculty/students/staff wishing to establish start up as a fulltime
effort. The seniority and other academic benefits during such period may be preserved for
such staff or faculty.
i. Institute will facilitate the startup activities/ technology development by allowing students/
faculty/ staff to use institute infrastructure and facilities, as per the choice of the potential
entrepreneur in the following manners:
iv Institute may also link the startups to other seed-fund providers/ angel funds/ venture funds
or itself may set up seed-fund once the incubation activities mature.
j. In return of the services and facilities, institute may take 2% to 9.5% equity/ stake in the
startup/ company, based on brand used, faculty contribution, support provided and use of
institute‟s IPR (a limit of 9.5% is suggested so that institute has no legal liability arising out
of startup. The institute should normally take much lower equity share, unless its full-time
faculty/ staff have substantial shares). Other factors for consideration should be space,
infrastructure, mentorship support, seedfunds, support for accounts, legal, patents etc.
• For staff and faculty, institute can take no-more than 20% of shares that staff / faculty takes
while drawing full salary from the institution; however, this share will be within the 9.5% cap
of company shares, listed above.
• No restriction on shares that faculty / staff can take, as long as they do not spend more than
20% of office time on the startup in advisory or consultative role and do not compromise with
their existing academic and administrative work / duties. In case the faculty/ staff holds the
executive or managerial position for more than three months in a startup, then they will go on
sabbatical/ leave without pay/ earned leave.
• In case of compulsory equity model, Startup may be given a cooling period of 3 months to
use incubation services on rental basis to take a final decision based on satisfaction of
services offered by the institute/incubator. In that case, during the cooling period, institute
cannot force startup to issue equity on the first day of granting incubation support.
k. The institute should also provide services based on mixture of equity, fee-based and/ or
zero payment model. So, a startup may choose to avail only the support, not seed funding, by
the institute on rental basis.
l. Institute could extend this startup facility to alumni of the institute as well as outsiders.
p. Institute should ensure that at no stage any liability accrue to it because of any activity of
any startup.
q. Where a student/ faculty startup policy is pre-existing in an institute, then the institute may
consider modifying their policy in spirit of these guidelines.
a. When institute facilities / funds are used substantially or when IPR is developed as a part of
curriculum/ academic activity, IPR is to be jointly owned by inventors and the institute.
i. Inventors and institute could together license the product / IPR to any commercial
organisation, with inventors having the primary say. License fees could be either / or a mix of
ii. An institute may not be allowed to hold the equity as per the current statute, so SPV may
be requested to hold equity on their behalf.
iii. If one or more of the inventors wish to incubate a company and license the product to this
company, the royalties would be no more than 4% of sale price, preferably 1 to 2%, unless it
is pure software product. If it is shares in the company, shares will again be 1% to 4%. For a
pure software product licensing, there may be a revenue sharing to be mutually decided
between the institute and the incubated company.
b. On the other hand, if product/ IPR is developed by innovators not using any institute
facilities, outside office hours (for staff and faculty) or not as a part of curriculum by student,
then product/ IPR will be entirely owned by inventors in proportion to the contributions made
by them. In this case, inventors can decide to license the technology to third parties or use the
technology the way they deem fit.
d. Institute IPR cell or incubation center will only be a coordinator and facilitator for
providing services to faculty, staff and students. They will have no say on how the invention
is carried out, how it is patented or how it is to be licensed. If institute is to pay for patent
filing, they can have a committee which can examine whether the IPR is worth patenting. The
committee should consist of faculty who have experience and excelled in technology
translation. If inventors are using their own funds or noninstitute funds, then they alone
should have a say in patenting.
a. University/ Institute should recruit staff that have a strong innovation and entrepreneurial/
industrial experience, behaviour and attitude. This will help in fostering the I&E culture.
i. Some of the relevant faculty members with prior exposure and interest should be deputed
for training to promote I&E.
b. Faculty and departments of the Universiy/institutes have to work in coherence and cross-
departmental linkages should be strengthened through shared faculty, cross-faculty teaching
and research in order to gain maximum utilization of internal resources and knowledge.
c. Periodically some external subject matter experts such as guest lecturers or alumni can be
engaged for strategic advice and bringing in skills which are not available internally.
e. In order to attract and retain right people, institute should develop academic and non-
academic incentives and reward mechanisms for all staff and stakeholders that actively
contribute and support entrepreneurship agenda and activities.
i. The reward system for the staff may include sabbaticals, office and lab space for
entrepreneurial activities, reduced teaching loads, awards, trainings, etc.
ii. The recognition of the stakeholders may include offering use of facilities and services,
strategy for shared risk, as guest teachers, fellowships, associate ships, etc.
iii. A performance matrix should be developed and used for evaluation of annual performance
of faculty.
i. Spreading awareness among students, faculty and staff about the value of entrepreneurship
and its role in career development or employability should be a part of the institutional
entrepreneurial agenda.
ii. Students/ staff should be taught that innovation (technology, process or business
innovation) is a mechanism to solve the problems of the society and consumers.
Entrepreneurs should innovate with focus on the market niche.
iv. To prepare the students for creating the start up through the education, integration of
education activities with enterprise-related activities should be done.
b. The University/institute should link their start ups and companies with wider
entrepreneurial ecosystem and by providing support to students who show potential, in pre-
startup phase. Connecting student entrepreneurs with real life entrepreneurs will help the
students in understanding real challenges which
may be faced by them while going through the innovation funnel and will increase the
probability of success.
c. The institute should establish Institution‟s Innovation Councils (IICs) as per the guidelines
of MHRD‟s Innovation Cell and allocate appropriate budget for its activities. IICs should
guide institutions in conducting various activities related to innovation, startup and
entrepreneurship development. Collective and concentrated efforts should be undertaken to
identify, scout, acknowledge, support and reward proven student ideas and innovations and to
further facilitate their entrepreneurial journey.
d. For strengthening the innovation funnel of the institute, access to financing must be opened
for the potential entrepreneurs.
i. Networking events must be organized to create a platform for the budding entrepreneurs to
meet investors and pitch their ideas.
ii. Provide business incubation facilities: premises at subsidised cost. Laboratories, research
facilities, IT services, training, mentoring, etc. should be accessible to the new start-ups.
iii. A culture needs to be promoted to understand that money is not FREE and is risk capital.
The entrepreneur must utilize these funds and return. While funding is taking risk on the
entrepreneur, it is an obligation of the entrepreneur to make every effort possible to prove that
the funding agency did right in funding him/ her.
e. Institute must develop a ready reckoner of Innovation Tool Kit, which must be kept on the
homepage on institute‟s website to answer the doubts and queries of the innovators and
enlisting the facilities available at the institute.
a.For better coordination of the entrepreneurial activities, norms for faculty to do startups
should be created by the institutes. Only those technologies should be taken for faculty
startups which originate from within the same institute.
i.Role of faculty may vary from being an owner/ direct promoter, mentor, consultant or as on-
board member of the startup.
ii.Institutes should work on developing a policy on 'conflict of interests' to ensure that the
regular duties of the faculty don‟t suffer owing to his/her involvement in the startup activities.
iii.Faculty startup may consist of faculty members alone or with students or with faculty of
other institutes or with alumni or with other entrepreneurs.
iv.In case of a faculty startup which consists of their student, the faculty should not give
students any advancement or demotion in their academics based on their work in the startup
and vice versa.
b.In case the faculty/ staff holds the executive or managerial position for more than three
months in a startup, they will go on sabbatical/ leave without pay/ utilize existing leave.
c.Faculty must clearly separate and distinguish on-going research at the institute from the
work conducted at the startup/ company.
f.Faculty must not involve research staff or other staff of institute in activities at the startup
and vice-versa.
i.Student clubs/ bodies/ departments must be created for organizing competitions, bootcamps,
workshops, awards, etc. These bodies should be involved in institutional strategy planning to
ensure enhancement of the student‟s thinking and responding ability.
iii.For creating awareness among the students, the teaching methods should include case
studies on business failure and real-life experience reports by startups.
iv.Tolerating and encouraging failures: Our systems are not designed for tolerating and
encouraging failure. Failures need to be elaborately discussed and debated to imbibe that
failure is a part of life, thus helping in reducing the social stigma associated with it. Very
importantly, this should be a part of institute‟s philosophy and culture.
v. Innovation champions should be nominated from within the students/ faculty/ staff for each
department/ stream of study. Institutes can conduct a departmental or institute level
tournament to do so.
ii.In the beginning of every academic session, institute should conduct an induction program
about the importance of I&E so that freshly inducted students are made aware about the
entrepreneurial agenda of the institute and available support systems. Curriculum for the
entrepreneurship education should be continuously updated based on entrepreneurship
research outcomes. This should also include case studies on failures.
iii. Institute should organize consultancy session by experts on regular basis for the students
who are willing to do start up.
iv. Industry linkages should be leveraged for conducting research and survey on trends in
technology, research, innovation, and market intelligence.
vi. Student innovators, startups, experts must be engaged in the dialogue process while
developing the strategy so that it becomes need based.
b. The institute should develop policy and guidelines for forming and managing the
relationships with external stakeholders including private industries.
c. Knowledge exchange through collaboration and partnership should be made a part of
institutional policy and institutes must provide support mechanisms and guidance for
creating, managing and coordinating these relationships.
i. Through formal and informal mechanisms such as internships, startup, innovation
programmes, etc., faculty, staff and students of the institutes should be given the
opportunities to connect with their external environment.
ii. Connect of the institute with the external environment must be leveraged in form
of absorbing information and experience from the external ecosystem into the
institute‟s environment.
iii. Single Point of Contact (SPOC) mechanism should be created in the institute for
the students, faculty, collaborators, partners and other stakeholders to ensure
access to information.
iv. Mechanisms should be devised by the institutions to ensure maximum
ANNEXURE-I
1. Committee Members