BUHI ST. JOSEPH’S ACADEMY, INC.

Senior High SchoolDepartment

SY 2023-2024
EVALUATION TOOL/RUBRIC
TITLE PROPOSAL
Name of Students: ______________________________ ______________________________ ______________________________

______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________

______________________________ _______________________________ _______________________________

DIRECTIONS: Rate the document by using the following criteria.

VG (5) – Very Good - If the element is accurately formulated/presented with all components and
formatted properly.
G (4) – Good - If the element is 61%-80% accurately formulated/presented and formatted
F (3) – Fair - If the element is 41%-60% accurately formulated/presented and formatted
P (2) – Poor - If the element is 21%-40% accurately formulated/presented and formatted
N (1) – Needs Improvement – If the element is 0%-20% accurately formulated/presented and formatted

PRESENTATION OF THE RESEARCH STUDY (40%)

INDICATOR VG (5) G (4) F (3) P (2) N (1) SCORE
1.Introduction Presentation of the Title, Overview Lacks one of the elements Lacks two of the elements Needs Improvement Needs changes
of the Study, purpose and format
are adequate.
2.Statement of the All are correctly formulated and One of the problems is not Two of the problems are not Needs Improvement Needs changes
Problem presented correct or presented. correct or presented.
3.Hypotheses and All are clearly and correctly One is not correctly Two are not correctly formulated Needs Improvement Needs changes
Assumptions formulated and presented. formulated and presented. and presented.
4.Locale of the Study Location Map is clearly illustrated Location map must be Location map must be Needs revision Needs changes
and presented. enhanced. improved.
5.Significance of the Study Beneficiaries and the benefits are Contents must be Contents must be improved. Contents must be Contents must be changed.
& Definition of Terms discussed completely. enhanced. revised.
6. Related Literature All variables have adequate No literature basis for one No literature basis for three to Needs Improvement Needs changes
literature, all stated literatures are or two variables, one four variables, two or three
relevant to the study and were literature is not relevant to literatures are not relevant to
briefly presented. the study. the study.
7. Theoretical framework All five theories and relationship Lacks one of the elements Lacks two of the elements Needs Improvement Needs changes
and paradigm were properly discussed. The
theorists, title and explanation are
 present in the manuscript.
8. Conceptual Framework 81%-100% accurate variables are 61%-80% accurate 41%-60& accurate 21%-40% accurate 0%-20% accurate
and Paradigm included. Relationships are
discussed.
11. Eye Contact, Body Maintains eye contact with One of the three areas Two of the three areas (eye Needs improvement All three areas (eye contact,
Language, Posture audience, seldom turning to notes. (eye contact, posture, or contact, posture, or movements) posture, and movements)
Posture is good: Movements seem movements) is not so is not so strong, resulting in a are not strong. Movements
fluid and help the audience strong, resulting in a slightly less engaging are not helpful in engaging
visualize or identify with what is slightly less engaging presentation. the audience.
being presented presentation.
12. Technology Makes effective use of technology Makes less effective of Makes improper use of Needs improvement Makes no use of technology
in the presentation and to find technology in the technology to find answer(s) to to find answer(s) to leading
answer(s) to leading question(s) presentation leading question(s) question(s)
13. Speaking Skills Uses presentation resources as a One heavily on Two rely heavily on the Needs improvement Essentially reads the
guide, gives detailed explanations, presentation to make presentation to make report, material from a presentation
is easily understandable report; somewhat seems uncomfortable. to make the report; clearly
comfortable with the topic uncomfortable with the topic
14. Visual Aides Contains visual aids that help Contains few visual aids Contains few or inadequate Needs improvement Contains no visual aids or
audience understand work; visuals but still help audience visual aids or visual aids have a visual aids are so poorly
have a neat and professional look, understand work;or visual neat and professional constructed as to be
easily understood; used well to aids have a neat and appearance, but poorly used in worthless
make points professional appearance, making points
but poorly used in making
points
15. Attire Appropriate for the presentation Appropriate for the One researcher is not Two researchers are not Far short of appropriate or
(real / imagined audience and presentation (real / appropriate for the presentation. appropriate for simply does not connect to
setting) as described by the imagined audience and presentation. guidelines for audience
instructor; Clear effort to meet / setting as described by the setting of presentation.
exceed expectations instructor. Effort meets Cannot see that effort was
expectations but is short of made to wear appropriate
exceeding expectations attire
16. Use Of Time Handles time designated for Handles time designated Exceeded 10 minutes and was Exceeded 15 minutes Demonstrates an entirely
presentation (and then q&a) for presentation (and then not able to finish and answer in ineffective use of time, way
impressively. Presentation and q&a) effectively and the question and answer too short or way too long.
answers are well thought out and answers are, for the most Answers to questions are
planned for part, well thought out; way too short or way too
some difficulty presenting long.
or answering in time
TOTAL
ACTUAL DEFENSE (60%)
Question 1 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
Question 2 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
 correctly. correctly.
Question 3 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
Question 4 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
Question 5 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
Question 6 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
Question 7 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
Question 8 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
Question 9 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
Question 10 81%-100% answered correctly. 61%-80% answered 41%-60% answered correctly. 21%-40% answered 0%-20% answered correctly.
correctly. correctly.
TOTAL

Suggestions:_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________

Criteria:

Presentation of the Research Study _______ x 40% = __________

Actual Defense ______ x 60% = __________

Final Grade: ==========

__________________________________________
Panelist