EIC IN BOMBAY and Calcutta
EIC IN BOMBAY and Calcutta
EIC IN BOMBAY and Calcutta
SETTLEMENT IN BOMBAY
AND
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
CALCUTTA
POLITICAL POSITION OF BOMBAY
POLITICAL POSITION OF BOMBAY
different from Madras
Portuguese acquired the island of Bombay from
sultan Bahadursah, king of Gujarat
from 1534 onwards it was u/Portuguese
king of Portugal, Alfonsus VI, gave Bombay in dowry
to king of England, Charles II, when English king
married his sister Catherine in 1668.
Charles II, thought Bombay being a backward
place-not economically profitable.
1668, Charles transferred Bombay to the Company-
for annual rent of 10 pound.
CHARTER OF 1668
No conclusive evidence
but gossip story by witnesses
one dancing girl had told the witnesses that pirate chief Angria had told her
that Kamti had written to him.
kamti’s servant was torture-extract evidence against kamti.
letter was manufactured by forgery
Kamti found guilty-imprisonment to indefinite period-his property was
confiscated and auctioned.
CJ of the court Parker objected the torture of
kamti’s servant.
CJ was dismissed by governor.
after auctioning kamti’s property –governor
claimed for about rs.32000-accepted. later got
Kamti’s booty.(valuable stolen goods, especially
those seized in war.)
After Kamti’s death,truth was out-he was innocent-trial was
a plot-concocted by governor boone- misused his power.
Settlement in Calcutta
1690-Job Charnock ,servant of the company laid
foundation of the British settlement in Calcutta.
EIC constructed fort William for it’s factory, by the
side of river hoogly (Hugli) in Bengal.
1, Grant of zamindari rights to company
2, Justice in criminal and civil cases
3, concentration of power in collector
4, Effective introduction of English laws
Grant of zamindari rights to company
settlement at Calcutta-different from madras and Bombay.
1698-prince Azim-us-shan, Subedar of Bengal and grandson of the
emperor Aurangzeb, granyed Zamindari rights of three villages-
Calcutta, sutanati, and Govindpur to the company.
co’ took full advantage of this authority-appointed collector to
control the administration of all three villages-collector hold
zamindari court for both civil and criminal cases.
this was a blunder by the Mughal king who blindly trusted these
merchants.
1699-status of Calcutta raised as presidency-its governor and
council entrusted all the necessary administrative and judicial
powers.
Collector was the Co's officer-also appointed a member of
governor’s council at Calcutta.
Justice in criminal and civil cases
In order to administer, Co’ adopted existing Mughal
Pattern.
faujdari court, presided by English collector, decide
criminal cases of the native of sutanati- govindpur, and
Calcutta.
death sentence was not inflicted unless the sentence
was confirmed by the governor/president and council
of Calcutta.
death sentence was executed by whipping to death
and not by hanging to death as was done later.
court took cognizance of petty crimes committed by
English people.
serious offences G and C were authorized to try by
charter 1661.
Civil cases-
collector preside over the civil court, or court of
Cutchery (A hall used for business, political, or social
assemblies, such as a magistrate's court).
ordinarily civil cases were referred to Arbitrators by the
collector.
collector decide cases according to custom and usages.
In the absence of such native custom, cases decided
according to Natural justice and equity. Only rare and
important cases, appeals were allowed to G & C.
collector in the capacity of a zamindar was also
responsible for the collection of land revenue from three
villages.
Concentration of power in
collector
office of collector-dealing civil, criminal
and revenue matters.
authorized to deal petty civil & criminal
case.
G & C-serious criminal cases
+ imp civil cases.
judicial & executive powers exercised by
collector and G & C.
Effective introduction of English
laws
charter 1668, 1726- co’ introduced
for the first time English laws side
by side the personal laws of Hindus
and Muslims.