ERP Vs SAP & Odoo

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Comparison between ERPNext

V/S
Odoo/SAP
ERP Next

❑ Simplicity of Customisation
• Easily edit code from any code editor
● It has a practical and easy-to-use interface • Write custom code to achieve your goals
● It is freely available. No license charges ❑ ERPNext is truly Open Source
• No Games! It’s an open-source
● With its comprehensive features, it saves your application
time and money
❑ Easy Training
● Its reporting system is straightforward
❑ Pocket friendly pricing
● It provides a flexible, centralized platform for
your business ❑ Unique functions and modules
• Project Management and Ecommerce
ERP Next

❑ Default Doc File Types


• When you create your doc type, you
don’t need an additional file to write
python code.
• Document js
• Document.json
• Document.py
• Test_document.py

❑ Adding custom file


• Additional python files for maximum
control of your application.
• Harnessing the power of the Python API
in Frappe Framework.

❑ Automating Actions
• Document Events
• Schedulers
ERPNext V/S Odoo
Odoo

❑ Rigid in terms of Customisation

❑ Difficult to train the developer

❑ Complicated and High Pricing

❑ Limited Support - With several support channels, Odoo has a limitation that it cannot provide seamless
customer support to all the clients due to limited resources.

❑ Complex set-up structure - Odoo ERP is intricate in structure and may be challenging to build or
implement according to your business necessities.Even though it is simplistic, it is quite complicated to
use and often requires an in-house IT specialist to maintain it.

❑ Compared to some other ERPs, there is a lot of manual data entry.


Odoo

❏ No automatic scheduling that would consider material or workstation availability.

❏ No estimation functionality that would allow manufacturers to give accurate lead times and
prices to customers.

❏ Complex pricing due to having to pay for modules separately.

❏ Lack of support and useful support materials.

❏ The software does not follow a central strategy, which makes the quality inconsistent.
ERPNext V/S SAP
SAP

● Expensive

● Complexity - needs consultants to set it up and maintain it (expensive & slow)

● Requires highly trained staff

● Long and slow implementations

● In practice many businesses struggle to grasp how to best use it to enhance integration

● Businesses often end up adapting to SAP, rather than SAP to the business

● Its hard to keep up, as SAP rolls out new versions nearly every 6 months.

● Training - its not intuitive enough which means it has a heavy reliance on this.

● Historically poor UX/UI - clunky look & feel, compared to what's out there

● SAP recognized its legacy status, however it took recent steps to address this with Fiori Apps & marketplace.
SAP

• Licencing Options
Professional
Role Limited

• Database Options
MS SQL
HANA

• SAP Options
ECC6 /
S4-Hana
SAB B1
Things we miss in ERPNext

• User Interface
• Graphical Relationship Map
THANK YOU

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy