Bài Số 10
Bài Số 10
Bài Số 10
BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003971 on 20 December 2013. Downloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on July 30, 2024 by guest. Protected by copyright.
Diagnostic workup for fever of
unknown origin: a multicenter
collaborative retrospective study
Toshio Naito,1 Masafumi Mizooka,2 Fujiko Mitsumoto,3 Kenji Kanazawa,4
Keito Torikai,5 Shiro Ohno,6 Hiroyuki Morita,7 Akira Ukimura,8 Nobuhiko Mishima,9
Fumio Otsuka,10 Yoshio Ohyama,11 Noriko Nara,12 Kazunari Murakami,13
Kouichi Mashiba,14 Kenichiro Akazawa,15 Koji Yamamoto,16 Shoichi Senda,17
Masashi Yamanouchi,1 Susumu Tazuma,2 Jun Hayashi3
BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003971 on 20 December 2013. Downloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on July 30, 2024 by guest. Protected by copyright.
Japan. In addition, we investigated the rate of perform-
ing various tests in the current diagnostic workup of
FUO.
METHODS
Among 99 hospitals affiliated with the Japanese Society
of Hospital General Medicine that were asked to partici-
pate in this study, 17 hospitals participated. The hospi-
tals participated in our study had a wide geographic
distribution throughout Japan, including 7 hospitals in
Eastern Japan and 10 hospitals in Western Japan. These
17 hospitals included 13 university hospitals and 4 com-
munity hospitals. Data were collected by these participat-
ing hospitals from patients ≥18 years who were Figure 1 Age and sex distribution of fever of unknown origin
diagnosed with ‘classical fever of unknown origin’ patients.
between 1 January and 31 December 2011. The data
were recorded on standardised case report forms and
disease (NIID) in 37 (30.6%), malignancy in 13
were collected by fax.
(10.7%), other in 15 (12.4%) and unknown in 28
Classical FUO was diagnosed based on the definition
(23.1%; figure 2). The most common causative disease
by Durack et al9 in patients meeting all of criteria 1–4
was polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR; 9 patients), followed
below.
by malignant lymphoma (8 patients) and adult Still’s
1. Fever with axillary temperature ≥38°C at least twice
disease (7 patients). Among the nine patients with PMR,
over a ≥3-week period.
coexisting giant cell arteritis was ruled out by PET in
2. Unknown cause after three outpatient visits or during
four patients and temporal artery biopsy in one patient.
3 days of hospitalisation.
In the remaining four patients, symptoms and the
3. Not diagnosed with immunodeficiency before fever
success of treatment with low-dose steroids suggested
onset.
PMR alone. Table 1 lists the frequent causative diseases.
4. No confirmed HIV infection before fever onset.
The prognosis in patients with undiagnosed FUO has
Axillary temperature is usually measured in Japan, so
been reported as relatively good.10 In our study as well,
fever was defined as a temperature ≥38°C.
among 28 patients with undiagnosed FUO, only 3 died
The data described below were collected. No add-
(10.7%). Among the three patients who died with
itional testing was performed in this study due to insuffi-
undiagnosed FUO, one was a 72-year-old man who
cient data.
developed disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
▸ Patient characteristics: sex, age, concomitant disease,
2 months after fever onset and died. Another was an
medical history and medication history.
82-year-old man who similarly developed DIC of
▸ Clinical findings: subjective symptoms and objective
unknown cause 1 month after fever onset and died. The
physical findings.
other was a 63-year-old woman in whom the cause of
▸ Blood tests: blood count, biochemical examination
FUO remained unknown despite PET and random skin
and inflammatory markers (C reactive protein (CRP),
biopsies. This patient developed respiratory failure
erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), procalcitonin).
about 6 months after fever onset and died.
▸ Results of blood cultures if performed.
▸ Results of imaging studies and endoscopy if
performed.
▸ Results of cytology, histology, genetic testing or
autopsy findings if performed.
▸ Final diagnosis, day of diagnosis and outcome.
RESULTS
A total of 121 patients with FUO were enrolled at the 17
participating hospitals. There were 52 women (43.0%),
and the median patient age was 59 years (range 19–
94 years). The most frequent age group was patients in
their 70s (figure 1). There were 112 patients from 13
university hospitals and 9 patients from 4 community
hospitals.
Causative diseases for FUO were infectious disease in Figure 2 Causative disease in fever of unknown origin. NIID,
28 (23.1%) patients, non-infectious inflammatory non-infectious inflammatory disease.
BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003971 on 20 December 2013. Downloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on July 30, 2024 by guest. Protected by copyright.
Table 1 Frequent causes
Causes Number (%)
Infection 28 (23.1)
Infectious endocarditis 4
HIV/AIDS 4
Tuberculosis 3
Other 17
NIID 37 (30.6)
Polymyalgia rheumatica 9
Still’s disease 7
Sarcoidosis 3
ANCA-associated vasculitis 3
Rheumatoid arthritis 3
Other 12
Malignancy 13 (10.7)
Malignant lymphoma 8
Castleman’s disease 2
Other 3
Other 15 (12.4)
Drug fever 3
Fraudulent fever 3
Other 9
Unknown 28 (23.1)
ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; NIID, non-infectious
inflammatory disease;.
BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003971 on 20 December 2013. Downloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on July 30, 2024 by guest. Protected by copyright.
ESR of 100 mm/h, including 5 with unknown cause, 2
with PMR and 2 with ANCA-associated vasculitis.
When evaluating FUO, performing differential diag-
nosis for bacterial infections is important, given the
need for prompt antibiotic therapy. It goes without
saying that blood cultures are essential. In patients with
bacteraemia given inappropriate treatment without per-
forming blood cultures, the mortality rate has been
reported as 3.18 times higher compared with patients
with initial appropriate treatment. However, if treatment
is switched based on blood culture results, the mortality
rate is only 1.27 times higher.15
In recent years, the usefulness of serum procalcitonin in
the differential diagnosis of bacterial infections has increas-
Figure 4 Causative disease in patients requiring ≥100 days ingly been reported, and serum procalcitonin is now in
until diagnosis (24 patients). wide use in Japan. Simon et al reported that for differential
diagnosis of bacterial infection from non-infectious disease,
≥65 years. A diagnosis of PMR, which occurs with a rela- serum procalcitonin offers higher sensitivity (88%) and spe-
tively high incidence in elderly patients, must thus be cificity (81%) than CRP (75% and 67%, respectively).16 In
considered for FUO. Moreover, this trend should also be our study, serum procalcitonin was measured in 43.8% of
considered in Western countries, where ageing of the patients. Although use of this test is widespread in Japan,
population is also expected. PMR had an influence, and 5.9% of patients with a serum procalcitonin level ≥0.25 ng/
when participants ≥65 and <65 years were compared, mL showed bacterial infection, and 11.5% of patients with
rates of NIID as a cause of FUO were similar (figure 3). a value <0.25 ng/mL also had bacterial infection. It is,
In Japan, 1529 new HIV infections were reported therefore, difficult to conclude that serum procalcitonin
during 2011,13 and this increase in HIV-infected persons is a superior test for the differential diagnosis of bacterial
is continuing. Our study also found four patients with infection in patients with classical FUO. Serum procalci-
FUO caused by HIV/AIDS. The importance of HIV/ tonin testing is also more expensive than CRP or ESR
AIDS as a cause of FUO will probably continue to testing, so indiscriminate measurement of serum procal-
increase in Japan. In our study, patients already diag- citonin in febrile patients should be avoided.
nosed with HIV infections before meeting the definition PET appears promising as a useful test to evaluate
of classical FUO were excluded. FUO. Many studies have been performed using this
Evaluations vary regarding the usefulness of ESR to modality in patients with FUO, all showing a percentage
diagnose FUO.6 Well-known diseases associated with ESR helpfulness that exceeds that of CT, MRI or other diag-
>100 mm/h include PMR, tuberculosis, multiple nostic possibilities.17–20 However, the fact that PET is not
myeloma and osteomyelitis (vertebral discitis), but malig- covered by National Health Insurance in Japan for
nancies have also been reported in about 60% of such patients with FUO is problematic. A previous Japanese
cases.14 In our study, 18 of 121 patients (14.9%) had an study about PET included patients with FUO evaluated
by radiology departments.21 In the present study, it was
interesting to see the frequency of PET use in general
medical settings, mainly for evaluating FUO.
Previous studies have reported increasing rates of
FUO in which the cause remains unknown.22 23 A pro-
spective study from the Netherlands reported that the
cause of FUO remained unknown in 51% of cases.6 The
rate of ‘unknown’ in our study was relatively small, but
this retrospective study may have encountered bias
because of the difficulty enrolling patients with an
unknown cause after undergoing tests. Furthermore,
retrospective studies also encounter the problem that
there may be no follow-up observation of patients until a
final diagnosis has been obtained. We are planning a
prospective study of patients who are enrolled at the
time when criteria for FUO are fulfilled, to perform
Figure 5 Frequency of tests performed for diagnostic periodic follow-up observations. Only 17 hospitals parti-
evaluation. WCC, white blood cells count; CRP, C reactive cipated in this study, so the results may not be generalis-
protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Ga, gallium; able to the overall situation in Japan. We hope that
PET, positron emission tomography. more hospitals will participate in future studies.
BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003971 on 20 December 2013. Downloaded from http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ on July 30, 2024 by guest. Protected by copyright.
CONCLUSION non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms,
We conducted the first nationwide study of patients with provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
FUO in Japan. Our study identified diseases that should
now be considered in the differential diagnosis for FUO.
This will be useful in future clinical practice. In addition, REFERENCES
we identified tests that are performed during the FUO 1. Alt HL, Barker MH. Fever of unknown origin. JAMA
1930;94:1457–61.
evaluation process at each hospital. This will serve as a 2. Petersdorf RG, Beeson PB. Fever of unexplained origin: report on
reference for selecting diagnostic tests in the future. 100 cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1961;40:1–30.
3. de Kleijn EM, Vandenbroucke JP, van der Meer JW. Fever of unknown
Guidelines should be created based on this type of study origin (FUO). I A. prospective multicenter study of 167 patients with
for future evaluation of FUO. FUO, using fixed epidemiologic entry criteria. The Netherlands FUO
Study Group. Medicine (Baltimore) 1997;76:392–400.
4. Miller RF, Hingorami AD, Foley NM. Pyrexia of undetermined origin
Author affiliations in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and AIDS.
1
Department of General Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Int J STD AIDS 1996;7:170–5.
Tokyo, Japan 5. Zenone T. Fever of unknown origin in adults: evaluation of 144
2 cases in a non-university hospital. Scand J Infect Dis
Department of General Internal Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital,
Hiroshima, Japan 2006;38:632–8.
3 6. Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, de Kleijn EM, et al. A prospective
Department of General Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, multicenter study on fever of unknown origin: the yield of a structured
Fukuoka, Japan diagnostic protocol. Medicine (Baltimore) 2007;86:26–38.
4
Department of General Internal Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, 7. Shoji S, Imamura A, Imai Y, et al. Fever of unknown origin: a review
Japan of 80 patients from the Shin’etsu area of Japan from 1986–1992.
5
Department of General Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Intern Med 1994;33:74–6.
8. Iikuni Y, Okada J, Kondo H, et al. Current fever of unknown origin
Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
6 1982-1992. Intern Med 1994;33:67–73.
Department of General Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan 9. Durack DT, Street AC. Fever of unknown origin: re-examined and
7
Department of General Internal Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of redefined. Current clinical topics in infectious diseases. Remington,
Medicine, Gifu, Japan JS: Blackwell Science, 1991:35–51.
8 10. Knockaert DC, Dujardin KS, Bobbaers HJ. Long-term follow-up of
Department of General Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
9
Department of General Internal Medicine, Kainan Hospital, Aichi Prefectural patients with undiagnosed fever of unknown origin. Arch Intern Med
1996;156:618–20.
Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Aichi, Japan 11. Health at a Glance 2009: OECD Indicators. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.
10
Department of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of org/sites/health_glance-2009-en/04/03/index.html?
Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan contentType=&itemId=/content/chapter/health_
11
Department of General Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of glance-2009-38-en&containerItemId=/content/serial/
Medicine, Gunma, Japan 19991312&accessItemIds=/content/book/health_
12
Department of General Medicine, Yokohama City University Medical Center, glance-2009-en&mimeType=text/html (accessed 12 Oct 2013).
12. Statistics Bureau, Director-General for Policy Planning, Statistical
Yokohama, Japan Research and Training Institute. http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/
13
Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, jinsui/tsuki/index.htm (accessed 12 Oct 2013).
Japan 13. AIDS list of statistical surveys conducted by the Ministry of Health,
14 Labour and Welfare. 2011. http://api-net.jfap.or.jp/status/2011/
Department of General Medicine, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center,
Kitakyushu, Japan 11nenpo/hyo_01.pdf (accessed 12 Oct 2013).
15 14. Zacharski LR, Kyle RA. Significance of extreme elevation of
Department of Internal Medicine, Shonan Fujisawa Tokushukai Hospital,
erythrocyte sedimentation rate. JAMA 1967;202:264–6.
Fujisawa, Japan 15. Weinstein MP, Towns ML, Quartey SM, et al. The clinical
16
Department of General Medicine, Sumitomo Hospital, Osaka, Japan significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective
17
Department of Integrated Medicine, Kagawa University School of Medicine, comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and
Kagawa, Japan outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis
1997;24:584–602.
16. Simon L, Gauvin F, Amre DK, et al. Serum procalcitonin and
C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a
Contributors TN, MM, AU, NM, FO, SS, ST and JH conceived and designed systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis
the study. TN, MM, FM, KK, KT, SO, HM, AU, NM, FO, YO, NN, KM, KM, KA, 2004;39:206–17.
KY and SS were involved in acquisition of data. TN, MM, FM, KK, KT, SO, 17. Bleeker-Rovers CP, Vos FJ, Mudde AH, et al. A prospective
HM, AU, NM, FO, YO, NN, KM, KM, KA, KY and SS analysed the data. TN, KT multi-centre study of the value of FDG-PET as part of a structured
diagnostic protocol in patients with fever of unknown origin. Eur J
and MY wrote the manuscript. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:694–703.
Funding Grant-in-Aid from MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, 18. Meller J, Altenvoerde G, Munzel U, et al. Fever of unknown origin:
prospective comparison of [18F] FDG imaging with a double-head
Science and Technology) Supported Program for the Strategic Research
coincidence camera and gallium-67 citrate SPET. Eur J Nucl Med
Foundation at Private Universities, 2012–2017. 2000;27:1617–25.
Competing interests None. 19. Kouijzer IJ, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Oyen WJ. FDG-PET in fever of
unknown origin. Semin Nucl Med 2013;43:333–9.
Ethics approval Research Ethics Committee of Juntendo University School of 20. Meller J, Sahlmann CO, Scheel AK. 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in
Medicine. fever of unknown origin. J Nucl Med 2007;48:35–45.
21. Kubota K, Nakamoto Y, Tamaki N, et al. FDG-PET for the diagnosis
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. of fever of unknown origin: a Japanese multi-center study. Ann Nucl
Med 2011;25:355–64.
Data sharing statement No additional data are available. 22. Horowitz HW. Fever of unknown origin or fever of too many origins?
N Engl J Med 2013;368:197–9.
Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with 23. Mourad O, Palda V, Detsky AS. A comprehensive evidence-based
the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, approach to fever of unknown origin. Arch Intern Med
which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work 2003;163:545–51.