The 7 Step Moral Reasoning

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

LESSON 4

THE 7- STEP MORAL


REASONING
A THEORY BY MICHAEL DAVIS

GROUP 5 ( ORANGE)
In this module, we provide some guiding
principles, and pathways to help guide ethical
decision-making. These are a series of basic
questions that should be asked when
confronted with ethical dilemmas. These are
often complex situations with no clear-cut
resolution, and without a right or wrong answer.
But these decision-making processes will go a
long way towards helping all of us make
informed decisions that can justify consequent
actions.
Lesson Objective
At the end of the lesson, the students are expected to:

1. Know each of the steps of the model


theorized by Michael Davis;
2. Be able to provide an example or make a
scenario where this model can be applied in
operative; and
3. Apply the Davis model in cases where its
principles can be appropriated.
1. STATE THE PROBLEM
The ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT
THERE IS AN EXISTING PROBLEM is
crucial prior to its full determination . . . BY
STATING THAT SOME THINGS HAVE TO
BE FIXED, one is able to pinpoint to where
the problem originates.

For example, "there's something about this decision that


makes me uncomfortable" or "do I have a conflict of
interest?"
2. ASCERTAIN THE FACTS
Not all problems identified would be
considered as legitimate problems. . .
DIFFICULTIES RESULT FROM
MISCOMMUNICATION . . .
ASCERTAINING THE FACTS CLEAR OUT
ALL THE DOUBTS PRESENT.
3. IDENTIFY RELEVANT
FACTS
One has to CIRCUMNAVIGATE THE
VARIABLES INVOLVED IN THE ISSUE.

Ex: As a teacher, you have caught someone cheating. Upon


doing the first two in the process, now you can check the
name of the student, the degree/extent of his action, the
specific rules that his action is based on in the handbook, all
while also asking him about his side of the story
4. DEVELOP A LIST OF OPTIONS
DEVELOPING A LIST OF OPTIONS
should LEAD TO A FOCUSED
CHOICE… choosing effectively solves
identified problem, therefore, IT MUST
ADDRESS THE PROBLEM BOTH
POSSIBLY AND PLAUSIBL
5. TEST OPTIONS
Returning to the old problem earlier,
THERE ARE MYRIAD OF OPTIONS
ONE CAN LOOK INTO BEFORE
JUDGMENT. The following can be used
as a test:
.
5. 1 VIRTUE TEST: If I were to ignore this, how does this reflect my own virtue?

5. 2 HARM TEST: What will be the effect of the possibility of non-disclosure?

5. 3 REVERSIBILITY TEST: Would I be also affected by it if I were in his/her


position?
5. 4 PROFESSIONAL TEST: How does my discipline or field see this action?
5. 5 ORGANIZATION TEST: How does the organization or my institution
observe the following problem?
5. 6 COLLEAGUE TEST: How does my colleague see the same issue?

5. 7 PUBLICITY TEST: How should this be treated publicly?

5. 8 DEFENSIBILITY TEST: How could this issue be defended, and where?


6. TENTATIVE CHOICES

The first five steps lead you to


make for yourself an INFORMED
CHOICE THAT CAN STILL BE
EVALUATED.
7. FINAL DECISION
The final choice is now set for a new ethical
decision. . . HAPPENS UPON FURTHER
EVALUATION OF THE STEPS. . . This also LEADS
TO ITS SIGNIFICANCE TO A FURTHER WHOLE:
SOCIETY and other INSTITUTIONS like the
CHURCH.
Reference
https://www.scribd.com/document/442590812/Seven-Ways-of-Moral-Reasoning-
docx#:~:text=7%2Dstep%20process.-,It%20involves%20stating%20the%20problem%2C%20
checking%20facts%2C%20identifying%20relevant%20internal,reviewing%20to%20reduce%
20future%20dilemmas.
MEMBERS :
DESUCATAN , PATRECIA
DIAZ, JASMER DALE
ELBANBUENA, DANIELLE
GADIAN, ANDREI BRYAN
GELISANGA, KRISHA CAYE

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy