Appendix E-1

Statistical Computations

Pretest-Posttest Performance of the Control and Experimental Group

Control Group Experimental Group

n = 30 n = 30

Students Students
Pretest Posttest Pretest Posttest

Score Description Score Description Score Description Score Description

1 4 Fair 5 Good 1 2 Poor 5 Good

2 4 Fair 6 Good 2 2 Poor 7 Very Good
3 3 Fair 5 Good 3 3 Fair 8 Very Good
4 6 Good 8 Very Good 4 2 Poor 8 Very Good
5 4 Fair 4 Fair 5 4 Fair 10 Excellent
6 4 Fair 4 Fair 6 2 Poor 7 Very Good
7 5 Good 6 Good 7 2 Poor 6 Good
8 1 Poor 3 Fair 8 1 Poor 7 Very Good
9 3 Fair 2 Poor 9 1 Poor 7 Very Good
10 3 Fair 5 Good 10 2 Poor 7 Very Good
11 4 Fair 6 Good 11 5 Good 9 Excellent
12 2 Poor 5 Good 12 6 Good 10 Excellent
13 2 Poor 4 Fair 13 6 Good 9 Excellent
14 3 Fair 5 Good 14 6 Good 9 Excellent
15 3 Fair 3 Fair 15 7 Very Good 9 Excellent
16 4 Fair 6 Good 16 4 Fair 8 Very Good
17 4 Fair 4 Fair 17 8 Very Good 9 Excellent
18 3 Fair 7 Very Good 18 3 Fair 8 Very Good
19 2 Poor 3 Fair 19 3 Fair 9 Excellent
20 3 Fair 7 Very Good 20 2 Poor 8 Very Good
21 5 Good 8 Very Good 21 5 Good 9 Excellent
22 3 Fair 5 Good 22 5 Good 9 Excellent
23 4 Fair 7 Very Good 23 6 Good 10 Excellent
24 3 Fair 5 Good 24 4 Fair 10 Excellent
25 3 Fair 7 Very Good 25 4 Fair 8 Very Good
26 1 Poor 4 Fair 26 2 Poor 9 Excellent
27 2 Poor 7 Very Good 27 0 Poor 8 Very Good
28 2 Poor 8 Very Good 28 4 Fair 9 Excellent
29 4 Fair 9 Excellent 29 0 Poor 7 Very Good
30 6 Good 9 Excellent 30 4 Fair 10 Excellent
Average 3.3 Fair 5.6 Good Average 3.5 Fair 8.3 Very Good
 Appendix E-2
T-Test Computations of the Pretest Performance of the Control and
Experimental Group
Normality Test of the Pretest Performance of the Control and Experimental
Group
NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wik
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
E_PRETEST .168 30 .030 .957 30 .266
C_PRETEST .173 30 .023 .933 30 .059
*This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Control Group Experimental Group

Students x1 x12 Students x2 x22
1 4 16 1 2 4
2 4 16 2 2 4
3 3 9 3 3 9
4 6 36 4 2 4
5 4 16 5 4 16
6 4 16 6 2 4
7 5 25 7 2 4
8 1 1 8 1 1
9 3 9 9 1 1
10 3 9 10 2 4
11 4 16 11 5 25
12 2 4 12 6 36
13 2 4 13 6 36
14 3 9 14 6 36
15 3 9 15 7 49
16 4 16 16 4 16
17 4 16 17 8 64
18 3 9 18 3 9
19 2 4 19 3 9
20 3 9 20 2 4
21 5 25 21 5 25
22 3 9 22 5 25
23 4 16 23 6 36
24 3 9 24 4 16
25 3 9 25 4 16
26 1 1 26 2 4
27 2 4 27 0 0
28 2 4 28 4 16
29 4 16 29 0 0
30 6 36 30 4 16

n1 = 30
∑ x 1=100 ∑ x 12=378 n2 = 30
∑ x 2=105 ∑ x 22=489
 x=
∑ x 1 = 100 =3.3 n ( ∑ x 21 )−( ∑ x 1)
2
t=
x 1−x 2

√
2
1
n1 30 SD =
1 2 2
n1 (n 1−1) SD1 SD2
+
n1 n2
x 2=
∑ x 2 = 105 =3.5 2 30 (378 )−10,000
SD =
2 30 1
30(30−1) 3.3−3.5
t=
( ∑ x 1 ) =(100)2=10,000
2
SD 1=
2 1,340
870
=1.54 √ 1.54 4.19
30
+
30
( ∑ x 2 ) =(105)2=11,025
2
t=−0.46
n ( ∑ x 22 )−( ∑ x 2)
2
2
SD 2= -0.46 ¿ -2.045, t-value
n2 (n 2−1)
does not fall on the
30 ( 489 )−11,025 critical region
SD 22=
30(30−1) ∴ Insignificant
2 3,645
SD 2= =4.19
870
 Appendix E-3
T-Test Computations of the Pretest and Posttest Performance of the
Control Group
Normality Test of the Pretest and Posttest Performance of the Control
Group
NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wik
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
C_PRETEST .173 30 .023 .933 30 .059
C_POSTTEST .154 30 .069 .961 30 .329
*This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Students Pretest Posttest D D2

(x) (y)
1 4 5 -1 1
2 4 6 -2 4
3 3 5 -2 4
4 6 8 -2 4
5 4 4 0 0
6 4 4 0 0
7 5 6 -1 1
8 1 3 -2 4
9 3 2 1 1
10 3 5 -2 4
11 4 6 -2 4
12 2 5 -3 9
13 2 4 -2 4
14 3 5 -2 4
15 3 3 0 0
16 4 6 -2 4
17 4 4 0 0
18 3 7 -4 16
19 2 3 -1 1
20 3 7 -4 16
21 5 8 -3 9
22 3 5 -2 4
23 4 7 -3 9
24 3 5 -2 4
25 3 7 -4 16
26 1 4 -3 9
27 2 7 -5 25
28 2 8 -6 36
29 4 9 -5 25
30 6 9 -3 9

n = 30
∑ x =100 ∑ y=167 ∑ D=−67 ∑ D 2=227
( ∑ D ) =(−67 )2=4 , 48 9
√
2
D−U D
n ( ∑ D )− ( ∑ D )
2 2
t=
SD= SD
∑D n ( n−1 )
D= √n

√
n 30 ( 227 )−4,489
SD= −2.23−0
t=
−67 30 ( 30−1 ) 1.63
D= =−2.23
30 √30
SD=
√ 2,321
870 t=−7.49
SD=1.63 -7.49 ¿ -2.045, t-value
falls on the critical
region
∴ Significant
 Appendix E-4
T-Test Computations of the Pretest and Posttest Performance of the
Experimental Group
Normality Test of the Pretest and Posttest Performance of the Experimental
Group
NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wik
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
E_PRETEST .168 30 .030 .957 30 .266
E_POSTTEST .210 30 .002 .912 30 .016
*This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Students Pretest Posttest D D2

(x) (y)
1 2 5 -3 9
2 2 7 -5 25
3 3 8 -5 25
4 2 8 -6 36
5 4 10 -6 36
6 2 7 -5 25
7 2 6 -4 16
8 1 7 -6 36
9 1 7 -6 36
10 2 7 -5 25
11 5 9 -4 16
12 6 10 -4 16
13 6 9 -3 9
14 6 9 -3 9
15 7 9 -2 4
16 4 8 -4 16
17 8 9 -1 1
18 3 8 -5 25
19 3 9 -6 36
20 2 8 -6 36
21 5 9 -4 16
22 5 9 -4 16
23 6 10 -4 16
24 4 10 -6 36
25 4 8 -4 16
26 2 9 -7 49
27 0 8 -8 64
28 4 9 -5 25
29 0 7 -7 49
30 4 10 -6 36

n = 30 ∑ x =105 ∑ y=249 ∑ D=−144 ∑ D 2=760

 √
2
( ∑ D ) =(−144 )2=20,736 D−U D
n ( ∑ D )− ( ∑ D )
2 2
t=
SD= SD
∑D n ( n−1 )
D=
√n

√
n 30 ( 760 )−20,736
SD= −4.8−0
t=
−144 30 (30−1 ) 1.54
D= =−4.8
30 √ 30
SD=
√ 2,064
870 t=−1 7. 07
SD=1.54 -17.07 ¿ -2.045, t-
value falls on the
critical region
∴ Significant
 Appendix E-5
T-Test Computations of the Posttest Performance of the Control and
Experimental Group
Normality Test of the Posttest Performance of the Control and
Experimental Group
NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wik
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
E_POSTTEST .210 30 .002 .912 30 .016
C_POSTTEST .154 30 .069 .961 30 .329
*This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Control Group Experimental Group

Students x1 x12 Students x2 x22
1 5 25 1 5 25
2 6 36 2 7 49
3 5 25 3 8 64
4 8 64 4 8 64
5 4 16 5 10 100
6 4 16 6 7 49
7 6 36 7 6 36
8 3 9 8 7 49
9 2 4 9 7 49
10 5 25 10 7 49
11 6 36 11 9 81
12 5 25 12 10 100
13 4 16 13 9 81
14 5 25 14 9 81
15 3 9 15 9 81
16 6 36 16 8 64
17 4 16 17 9 81
18 7 49 18 8 64
19 3 9 19 9 81
20 7 49 20 8 64
21 8 64 21 9 81
22 5 25 22 9 81
23 7 49 23 10 100
24 5 25 24 10 100
25 7 49 25 8 64
26 4 16 26 9 81
27 7 49 27 8 64
28 8 64 28 9 81
29 9 81 29 7 49
30 9 81 30 10 100

n1 = 30
∑ x 1=167 ∑ x 12=1,029 n2 = 30
∑ x 2=249 ∑ x 22=2,113
 x=
∑ x 1 = 167 =5.57 n ( ∑ x 21 )−( ∑ x 1)
2
t=
x 1−x 2

√
2
1
n1 30 SD =
1 2 2
n1 (n 1−1) SD1 SD2
+
n1 n2
x 2=
∑ x 2 = 249 =8.3 2 30 (1,029 )−27,889
SD =
2 30 1
30(30−1) 5.57−8.3
t=
( ∑ x 1 ) =(167)2=27,889
2
SD 1=
2 2,981
870
=3.43 √3.43 1.6
+
30 30
( ∑ x 2 ) =(249)2=62,001
2
t=−6.67
n ( ∑ x 22 )−( ∑ x 2)
2
2
SD 2= -6.67 ¿ -2.045, t-value
n2 (n 2−1)
falls on the critical
30 (2,113 )−62,001 region
SD 22=
30(30−1) ∴ Significant
2 1,389
SD 2= =1.6
870