0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views

week 2

Uploaded by

Daveson Erebaren
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views

week 2

Uploaded by

Daveson Erebaren
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

DAILY LESSON LOG SCHOOL LAMPITAK NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL GRADE LEVEL/SECTION 12/CELESTITE

TEACHER DAVESON B. EREBAREN LEARNING AREA PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2


TEACHING WEEK WEEK 2 QUARTER 2
DATES/TIME September 30-October 3, 2024/1:15-2:15 P.M. SCHOOL-YEAR 2024-2025

MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY

I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content Standards The learner demonstrates understanding of:
1. quantitative research designs
2. description of sample
3. instrument development
4. description of intervention (if applicable)
5. data collection and analysis procedures such as survey, interview, and observation
6. guidelines in writing research methodology
B. Performance Standards The learner is able to:
describe adequately quantitative research designs, sample, instrument used, intervention (if applicable), data collection, and analysis procedures
C. Learning Competencies describes sampling procedure and constructs an instrument plans data collection presents written
and code the sample and establishes its procedure research methodology
CS_RS12-IIa-c-2 validity and reliability CS_RS12-IIa-c-5 CS_RS12-IIa-c-7
CS_RS12-IIa-c-3
D. Learning Objectives a. discuss sampling procedure a. Differentiate between a. Identify different types of a. Identify the key
and sample. various types of validity data collection methods components of a
b. Write sampling procedures and (content, construct, (e.g., surveys, interviews, research methodology
samples of the research study criterion) and reliability observations). (research design,
(test-retest, inter-rater, b. Critically analyze factors sampling, data collection
internal consistency). that influence data methods, analysis).
b. Apply methods to collection (sampling, b. Critically evaluate the
check and improve the ethical considerations, clarity, coherence, and
validity and reliability of time, and resources). justification of
instruments. c. Determine appropriate methodology in research
c. Analyze a sample data collection methods for writing.
instrument to identify specific research c. Understand the
potential validity and scenarios. importance of
reliability issues. transparency in
explaining how research
is conducted.
II. CONTENT SAMPLING PROCEDURE AND CONSTRUCTING AN PLANNING A DATA PRESENTING A
THE SAMPLE INSTRUMENT AND COLLECTION WRITTEN RESEARCH
ESTABLISHING ITS PROCEDURE METHODOLOGY
VALIDITY AND
RELIABILITY

LEARNING RESOURCES
A. References
1. Teacher’s Guide
2. Learners’ Materials SLM SLM SLM SLM
3. Textbook, Page
4. Additional references
from LR Portal
5. Other Learning
Resources
III. PROCEDURES
A. Review
B. Motivation
C. Activity TASK 1: TASK 1: TASK 1: TASK 1: Start with a
You are almost finished cooking Directions. Begin with a Directions: Start with a discussion: Ask students
the favorite quick icebreaker: Ask brief discussion: Ask to think about why the
meal of the family. In order to students to recall a time students how they would methodology section is
check if it tastes good and ready when they had to fill out a collect information to important. Why should
for serving. survey or take a test. answer a specific research researchers clearly
Discuss how they felt question (e.g., how explain their methods?
about its accuracy and students manage stress). Introduce the topic:
fairness. Introduce the Introduce the topic of the Presenting a clear,
day's topic by explaining day: Planning a structured structured, and
that instruments need to and effective data transparent research
be both valid (measure collection procedure methodology.
what they are supposed
to measure) and reliable
(consistently produce the
same results).
D. Analysis 1. what will you do or the steps in -Present the types of -Present the different data -Present the key
order to taste good and ready for validity (content, criterion, collection methods (e.g., components of a written
serving construct) and types of surveys, interviews, focus research methodology:
reliability (test-retest, groups, observations). Research Design:
inter-rater, internal -Explain when each -Describe the overall
consistency). Use method is most appropriate approach (qualitative,
examples such as and their quantitative, or mixed
standardized tests or advantages/disadvantages. methods).
psychological -Discuss the key Sampling: Explain who
questionnaires. considerations in data or what was studied and
-Guide students through collection: how participants or
an example of a poorly Sampling: Who or what are samples were chosen.
designed instrument and you collecting data from? -Data Collection
analyze why it lacks Timing: How long will the Methods: Describe how
validity or reliability. data collection take? data were gathered
Encourage students to Resources: What tools or (surveys, interviews,
identify specific issues. instruments will you need? experiments, etc.).
Ethics: Are there any Data Analysis: Explain
ethical concerns related to how data were
consent, confidentiality, processed and analyzed
etc.? (statistical tests,
Provide examples from real thematic analysis, etc.).
research projects, showing Analyze sample
how data collection methodology sections
procedures were planned. from research papers. -
Discuss what works well
and what can be
improved. Encourage
students to critically
assess clarity,
completeness, and
logical flow.
E. Abstraction Discuss -Ask students to -Ask students to -Ask students to
- sampling procedure and sample summarize the key steps summarize the main steps summarize the key
in developing a valid and in planning a data reasons why a well-
reliable instrument: collection procedure: written methodology is
Step 1: Define what you Step 1: Define the research essential in research:
want to measure objectives and questions. Replicability: Others can
(construct). Step 2: Choose follow the same process
Step 2: Develop appropriate data collection to verify findings.
items/questions that methods. Validity: Clear methods
directly relate to the Step 3: Identify the sample support the credibility of
construct. or sources of data. the results.
Step 3: Test the Step 4: Plan the logistics Transparency: Detailed
instrument with a small (timeline, resources). explanations build trust
sample and analyze Step 5: Address ethical in the research.
results. issues (e.g., informed Emphasize that the
Step 4: Refine the consent). methodology should
instrument based on Highlight the significance of logically connect to the
reliability and validity each step in ensuring the research questions and
testing. quality and credibility of the objectives.
-Discuss the importance research findings.
of pre-testing (pilot
testing) instruments and
making necessary
adjustments before full-
scale data collection.
F. Application TASK 1: Determine the Sampling TASK 2: Divide students TASK 2: TASK 2: Individual or
Procedure into small groups. Each -Group Activity: In small Group Activity: Have
Directions: Identify the sampling group is tasked with groups, students are students draft or refine
procedure used in each given constructing a short assigned a hypothetical the methodology section
situation. Write your answer questionnaire (5-10 research question (e.g., the of their own research
on the space provided and then questions) on a simple impact of social media on project or a hypothetical
explain your choice. topic (e.g., student study academic performance). - study.
habits). Each group will:
Choose a data collection
method(s) suitable for the
research question.
Identify the target sample.
-Plan a timeline for data
collection.
Consider any ethical
issues.
-Groups will then present
their data collection plans
to the class for feedback.
IV. EVALUATION 10 points Assess group instruments Evaluate the group Evaluate students' final
Search on the internet for a based on the accuracy of presentations based on the methodology sections
sample research study. Identify design, attention to appropriateness of the based on clarity,
the research design validity, and reliability, as chosen methods, clarity of coherence, justification,
used and its sampling procedure. well as the quality of peer the procedure, and and alignment with
feedback. attention to ethical research questions.
concerns.
V. ASSIGNMENT Assign students to apply Have students create a Ask students to finalize
what they've learned by detailed data collection the methodology section
selecting a published plan for a personal for their research project
research instrument (from research project or class or class assignment.
an academic journal) and assignment, incorporating They should incorporate
critiquing its validity and the elements discussed in peer feedback and
reliability in a 1-page class. ensure all key elements
written summary. are thoroughly
explained.
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned
80% on the formative
assessment
B. No.of learners who require
additional activities for
remediation
C. Which of my teaching
strategies worked well?
Why did these works?
Prepared by:

DAVESON B. EREBAREN DAVESON B. EREBAREN DAVESON B. EREBAREN DAVESON B. EREBAREN


Teacher II Teacher II Teacher II Teacher II
Checked by:

JANE B. JUMAWAN, HT-I JANE B. JUMAWAN, HT-I JANE B. JUMAWAN, HT-I JANE B. JUMAWAN, HT-I
School Head School Head School Head School Head

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy