0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views

Forgetting_curve

The forgetting curve illustrates the decline of memory retention over time without active recall, showing that individuals typically forget half of newly learned information within days or weeks. Hermann Ebbinghaus, who first studied this phenomenon in the late 19th century, found that memory strength is influenced by factors such as material difficulty and mnemonic techniques. Subsequent research has confirmed Ebbinghaus's findings and suggested methods like spaced repetition can significantly improve memory retention.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views

Forgetting_curve

The forgetting curve illustrates the decline of memory retention over time without active recall, showing that individuals typically forget half of newly learned information within days or weeks. Hermann Ebbinghaus, who first studied this phenomenon in the late 19th century, found that memory strength is influenced by factors such as material difficulty and mnemonic techniques. Subsequent research has confirmed Ebbinghaus's findings and suggested methods like spaced repetition can significantly improve memory retention.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Forgetting curve

The forgetting curve hypothesizes the decline of memory


retention in time. This curve shows how information is lost
over time when there is no attempt to retain it.[1] A related
concept is the strength of memory that refers to the
durability that memory traces in the brain. The stronger the
memory, the longer period of time that a person is able to
recall it. A typical graph of the forgetting curve purports to
show that humans tend to halve their memory of newly
learned knowledge in a matter of days or weeks unless they
consciously review the learned material.
A representation of the forgetting curve
The forgetting curve supports one of the seven kinds of
showing retained information halving after
memory failures: transience, which is the process of each day
forgetting that occurs with the passage of time.[2]

History
From 1880 to 1885, Hermann Ebbinghaus ran a
limited, incomplete study on himself and published his
hypothesis in 1885 as Über das Gedächtnis (later
translated into English as Memory: A Contribution to
Experimental Psychology).[3] Ebbinghaus studied the
memorisation of nonsense syllables, such as "WID"
and "ZOF" (CVCs or Consonant–Vowel–Consonant)
by repeatedly testing himself after various time periods
and recording the results. He plotted these results on a The forgetting curve, with original data from
graph creating what is now known as the "forgetting Ebbinghaus
curve".[3] Ebbinghaus investigated the rate of
forgetting, but not the effect of spaced repetition on the
increase in retrievability of memories.[4]

Ebbinghaus's publication also included an equation to approximate his forgetting curve:[5]

Here, represents 'Savings' expressed as a percentage, and represents time in minutes, counting from
one minute before end of learning. The constants c and k are 1.25 and 1.84 respectively. Savings is
defined as the relative amount of time saved on the second learning trial as a result of having had the first.
A savings of 100% would indicate that all items were still known from the first trial. A 75% savings
would mean that relearning missed items required 25% as long as the original learning session (to learn
all items). 'Savings' is thus, analogous to retention rate.

In 2015, an attempt to replicate the forgetting curve with one study subject has shown the experimental
results similar to Ebbinghaus' original data.[6]

Ebbinghaus' experiment has significantly contributed to experimental psychology. He was the first to
carry out a series of well-designed experiments on the subject of forgetting, and he was one of the first to
choose artificial stimuli in the research of experimental psychology. Since his introduction of nonsense
syllables, a large number of experiments in experimental psychology has been based on highly controlled
artificial stimuli.[6]

Increasing rate of learning


Hermann Ebbinghaus hypothesized that the speed of forgetting depends on a number of factors such as
the difficulty of the learned material (e.g. how meaningful it is), its representation and other physiological
factors such as stress and sleep. He further hypothesized that the basic forgetting rate differs little
between individuals. He concluded that the difference in performance can be explained by mnemonic
representation skills.

He went on to hypothesize that basic training in mnemonic techniques can help overcome those
differences in part. He asserted that the best methods for increasing the strength of memory are:

1. better memory representation (e.g. with mnemonic techniques)


2. repetition based on active recall (especially spaced repetition).
His premise was that each repetition in learning increases the
optimum interval before the next repetition is needed (for near-
perfect retention, initial repetitions may need to be made within
days, but later they can be made after years). He discovered that
information is easier to recall when it's built upon things you
already know, and the forgetting curve was flattened by every
repetition. It appeared that by applying frequent training in
learning, the information was solidified by repeated recalling.

Later research also suggested that, other than the two factors
Forgetting Curve with Spaced
Ebbinghaus proposed, higher original learning would also produce Repetition
slower forgetting. The more information was originally learned,
the slower the forgetting rate would be.[7]

Spending time each day to remember information will greatly decrease the effects of the forgetting curve.
Some learning consultants claim reviewing material in the first 24 hours after learning information is the
optimum time to actively recall the content and reset the forgetting curve.[8] Evidence suggests waiting
10–20% of the time towards when the information will be needed is the optimum time for a single
review.[9]
Some memories remain free from the detrimental effects of interference and do not necessarily follow the
typical forgetting curve as various noise and outside factors influence what information would be
remembered.[10] There is debate among supporters of the hypothesis about the shape of the curve for
events and facts that are more significant to the subject.[11] Some supporters, for example, suggest that
memories of shocking events such as the Kennedy Assassination or 9/11 are vividly imprinted in memory
(flashbulb memory).[12] Others have compared contemporaneous written recollections with recollections
recorded years later, and found considerable variations as the subject's memory incorporates after-
acquired information.[13] There is considerable research in this area as it relates to eyewitness
identification testimony, and eyewitness accounts are found demonstrably unreliable.[13]

Equations
Many equations have since been proposed to approximate forgetting, perhaps the simplest being an
exponential curve described by the equation[14]

where is retrievability (a measure of how easy it is to retrieve a piece of information from memory),
is stability of memory (determines how fast falls over time in the absence of training, testing or other
recall), and is time.

Simple equations such as this one were not found to provide a good fit to the available data.[15]

See also
Atrophy – Partial or complete wasting away of a part of the body
Learning curve – Relationship between proficiency and experience
Overlearning – Practicing newly acquired skills beyond the point of initial mastery
Spacing effect
Spaced repetition – Learning technique performed with flashcards

Notes
1. "Curve of Forgetting | Counselling Services" (https://web.archive.org/web/20170329184930/
https://uwaterloo.ca/counselling-services/curve-forgetting). Archived from the original (http
s://uwaterloo.ca/counselling-services/curve-forgetting) on 2017-03-29. Retrieved
2017-08-28.
2. Schacter, D. L. (2009). Psychology (https://archive.org/details/psychology0000scha). New
York: Worth Publishers. p. 243 (https://archive.org/details/psychology0000scha/page/243).
ISBN 978-1-4292-3719-2.
3. Ebbinghaus, Hermann (1913). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology (https://
archive.org/details/memorycontributi00ebbiuoft/page/n5/mode/2up). Translated by Ruger,
Henry; Bussenius, Clara. New York city, Teachers college, Columbia university.
4. Wozniak, Piotr (22 November 2017). "Did Ebbinghaus invent spaced repetition?" (https://ww
w.supermemo.com/en/blog/post/did-ebbinghaus-invent-spaced-repetition).
www.supermemo.com. Retrieved 2020-07-11.
5. Ebbinghaus (1913), p. 77
6. Murre, Jaap M. J.; Dros, Joeri (2015). "Replication and Analysis of Ebbinghaus' Forgetting
Curve" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492928). PLOS ONE. 10 (7):
e0120644. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1020644M (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PLoS
O..1020644M). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120644 (https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.
0120644). PMC 4492928 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4492928).
PMID 26148023 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26148023).
7. Loftus, Geoffrey R. (1985). "Evaluating forgetting curves" (http://faculty.washington.edu/gloft
us/Downloads/LoftusForgettingCurves.pdf) (PDF). Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 11 (2): 397–406. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.603.9808 (https://cites
eerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.603.9808). doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.397
(https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0278-7393.11.2.397). Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/200
60910200647/http://faculty.washington.edu/gloftus/Downloads/LoftusForgettingCurves.pdf)
(PDF) from the original on 2006-09-10.
8. "Curve of Forgetting | Counselling Services" (https://web.archive.org/web/20170329184930/
https://uwaterloo.ca/counselling-services/curve-forgetting). Archived from the original (http
s://uwaterloo.ca/counselling-services/curve-forgetting) on 2017-03-29. Retrieved
2017-08-28.
9. Pashler, Harold; Rohrer, Doug; Cepeda, Nicholas J.; Carpenter, Shana K. (2007-04-01).
"Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences" (https://doi.org/1
0.3758%2FBF03194050). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14 (2): 187–193.
doi:10.3758/BF03194050 (https://doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03194050). ISSN 1069-9384 (http
s://search.worldcat.org/issn/1069-9384). PMID 17694899 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
17694899).
10. Averell, Lee; Heathcote, Andrew (2011). "The form of the forgetting curve and the fate of
memories". Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 55: 25–35. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.009
(https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jmp.2010.08.009). hdl:1959.13/931260 (https://hdl.handle.net/1
959.13%2F931260).
11. Forgetting Curve | Training Industry (http://www.trainingindustry.com/wiki/entries/forgetting-c
urve.aspx)
12. Paradis, C. M.; Florer, F.; Solomon, L. Z.; Thompson, T. (August 1, 2004). "Flashbulb
Memories of Personal Events of 9/11 and the Day after for a Sample of New York City
Residents". Psychological Reports. 95 (1): 309. doi:10.2466/pr0.95.1.304-310 (https://doi.or
g/10.2466%2Fpr0.95.1.304-310). PMID 15460385 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/154603
85). S2CID 46013520 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:46013520).
13. "Why Science Tells Us Not to Rely on Eyewitness Accounts" (http://www.scientificamerican.c
om/article.cfm?id=do-the-eyes-have-it). Scientific American. January 2010.
doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0110-68 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fscientificamericanm
ind0110-68) (inactive 1 November 2024).
14. Woźniak, Piotr A.; Gorzelańczyk, Edward J.; Murakowski, Janusz A. (1995). "Two
components of long-term memory" (http://www.ane.pl/pdf/5535.pdf) (PDF). Acta
Neurobiologiae Experimentalis. 55 (4): 301–305. doi:10.55782/ane-1995-1090 (https://doi.or
g/10.55782%2Fane-1995-1090). PMID 8713361 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/871336
1). Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20100920055038/http://ane.pl/pdf/5535.pdf) (PDF)
from the original on 2010-09-20.
15. Rubin, David C.; Hinton, Sean; Wenzel, Amy (1999). "The precise time course of retention".
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 25 (5): 1161–1176.
doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1161 (https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0278-7393.25.5.1161).
hdl:10161/10146 (https://hdl.handle.net/10161%2F10146).
References
"Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology -- Ebbinghaus (1885/1913)" (http://psy
chclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/index.htm). Retrieved 2007-08-23.
Schacter, Daniel L (2001). The seven sins of memory: how the mind forgets and remembers
(https://archive.org/details/sevensinsofmemor0000scha). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
ISBN 978-0-618-21919-3.
Baddeley, Alan D. (1999). Essentials of human memory (https://archive.org/details/essential
sofhuma00badd). Hove: Psychology. ISBN 978-0-86377-544-4.
Bremer, Rod. The Manual – A guide to the Ultimate Study Method (USM) (Amazon Digital
Services).
Loftus, Geoffrey R. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition11. 2 (Apr 1985): 397–406.
http://www.trainingindustry.com/wiki/entries/forgetting-curve.aspx
Averell, Lee; Heathcote, Andrew (February 2011). "The form of the forgetting curve and the
fate of memories". Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 55 (1): 25–35.
doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.009 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jmp.2010.08.009).
hdl:1959.13/931260 (https://hdl.handle.net/1959.13%2F931260).
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/
https://qz.com/1213768/the-forgetting-curve-explains-why-humans-struggle-to-memorize/
https://www.growthengineering.co.uk/what-is-the-forgetting-curve/

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Forgetting_curve&oldid=1254905816"

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy