Curl and Divergence
Curl and Divergence
Definition
Let F~ = (F1 , F2 , F3 ) be a vector field. The curl of F
~ is the vector
field defined by
~) = δF3 δF2 δF1 δF3 δF2 δF1
curl(F − , − , − .
δy δz δz δx δx δy
Curl and Divergence
Definition
Let F~ = (F1 , F2 , F3 ) be a vector field. The curl of F
~ is the vector
field defined by
~) = δF3 δF2 δF1 δF3 δF2 δF1
curl(F − , − , − .
δy δz δz δx δx δy
~ as the
As a mnemonic device, one can think of the curl of F
symbolic cross product:
~) = ∇×F
curl(F ~ = ( δ , δ , δ ) × (F1 , F2 , F3 ).
δx δy δz
Curl and Divergence, contd.
Definition
Again let F~ = (F1 , F2 , F3 ) be a vector field. The divergence of F
~
is the real-valued function in three variables defined by
Definition
Again let F~ = (F1 , F2 , F3 ) be a vector field. The divergence of F
~
is the real-valued function in three variables defined by
~) = ∇·F
div(F ~ = ( δ , δ , δ ) · (F1 , F2 , F3 ).
δx δy δz
Physical Significance
The physical applications of the notions of curl and divergence of a vector field are
impossible to fully capture within the scope of this class (and this slide!). However, we
can give some terse indications in the context of fluid dynamics.
The physical applications of the notions of curl and divergence of a vector field are
impossible to fully capture within the scope of this class (and this slide!). However, we
can give some terse indications in the context of fluid dynamics.
Imagine taking a paddle-wheel (which can spin in any direction) and fixing it at a point
~ at (x, y , z) may be imagined as the axis on which
(x, y , z). Then the curl vector of F
the fluid makes the wheel spin according to the right-hand rule: that is, if you stick
your right thumb up in the direction of the curl, the wheel will spin in the direction
that your fingers curl. The magnitude of the curl vector is how fast the wheel rotates.
Physical Significance
The physical applications of the notions of curl and divergence of a vector field are
impossible to fully capture within the scope of this class (and this slide!). However, we
can give some terse indications in the context of fluid dynamics.
Imagine taking a paddle-wheel (which can spin in any direction) and fixing it at a point
~ at (x, y , z) may be imagined as the axis on which
(x, y , z). Then the curl vector of F
the fluid makes the wheel spin according to the right-hand rule: that is, if you stick
your right thumb up in the direction of the curl, the wheel will spin in the direction
that your fingers curl. The magnitude of the curl vector is how fast the wheel rotates.
~, G
If F ~ are any two vectors fields then
~ +G
curl(F ~ ) = curl(F
~ ) + curl(G
~ ) and
~ +G
div(F ~ ) = div(F
~ ) + div(G
~ ),
~ ) = c curl(F
curl(c F ~ ) = c div(F
~ ) and div(c F ~ ).
First we will just compute the line integral about the boundary δS, which is the unit
circle in the xy -plane oriented counterclockwise. We can parametrize δS in the usual
way:
~c (t) = (cos t, sin t, 0) on the domain [0, 2π].
Solution
~ = (−y , 2x, x + z)
Known: F
First we will just compute the line integral about the boundary δS, which is the unit
circle in the xy -plane oriented counterclockwise. We can parametrize δS in the usual
way:
~c (t) = (cos t, sin t, 0) on the domain [0, 2π].
Now compute:
I Z 2π
~ · ds =
F ~ (~c (t)) · ~c ′ (t)dt
F
δS 0
Z 2π
= (− sin t, 2 cos t, cos t) · (− sin t, cos t, 0)dt
0
Z 2π
= (sin2 t + 2 cos2 t)dt
0
Z 2π
= (1 + cos2 t)dt
0
Z
3 2π
1
= + cos 2t dt
0 2 2
2π
3 1
= t + sin 2t = 3π.
2 4 0
Solution, contd.
Known: F ~ = (−y , 2x, x + z)
~ · ds = 3π
H
δS F
Now we will compute the flux integral over S. First we parametrize the upper unit
hemisphere in the usual way:
π
G (θ, φ) = (cos θ sin φ, sin θ sin φ, cos φ) on the domain [0, 2π] × [0, 2
].
Solution, contd.
Known: F ~ = (−y , 2x, x + z)
~ · ds = 3π
H
δS F
Now we will compute the flux integral over S. First we parametrize the upper unit
hemisphere in the usual way:
π
G (θ, φ) = (cos θ sin φ, sin θ sin φ, cos φ) on the domain [0, 2π] × [0, 2
].
Now we will compute the flux integral over S. First we parametrize the upper unit
hemisphere in the usual way:
π
G (θ, φ) = (cos θ sin φ, sin θ sin φ, cos φ) on the domain [0, 2π] × [0, 2
].
~θ × T
~n = T ~ φ = (cos θ sin2 φ, sin θ sin2 φ, sin φ cos φ).
Solution, contd.
Known: F ~ = (−y , 2x, x + z)
~ · ds = 3π
H
δS F
Now we will compute the flux integral over S. First we parametrize the upper unit
hemisphere in the usual way:
π
G (θ, φ) = (cos θ sin φ, sin θ sin φ, cos φ) on the domain [0, 2π] × [0, 2
].
~θ × T
~n = T ~ φ = (cos θ sin2 φ, sin θ sin2 φ, sin φ cos φ).
At this moment we verify mentally or graphically that we have chosen the correct
orientation for our normal vector ~n. (If we had accidentally parametrized S in such a
way that ~n faced the wrong direction, then we could fix the problem by just flipping
the sign on ~n.)
Solution, contd.
~ ):
Next compute curl(F
~
i ~j ~k
~ ) = det
curl(F δ δ δ
δx δy δz
−y 2x x +z
δ δ δ δ δ δ
= (x + z) − (2x), − (x + z) + (−y ), (2x) − (−y )
δy δz δx δz δx δy
= (0, −1, 3).
Solution, contd.
Known: F ~ = (−y , 2x, x + z)
~ · ds = 3π
H
δS F
~n = (cos θ sin2 φ, sin θ sin2 φ, sin φ cos φ)
curl(F~ ) = (0, −1, 3)
Solution, contd.
Known: F ~ = (−y , 2x, x + z)
~ · ds = 3π
H
δS F
~n = (cos θ sin2 φ, sin θ sin2 φ, sin φ cos φ)
curl(F~ ) = (0, −1, 3)
Z Z Z π/2 Z 2π
~ ) · dS =
curl(F ~ )(G (θ, φ)) · ~n(θ, φ)dθdφ
curl(F
S 0 0
Z π/2 Z 2π
= (0, −1, 3) · (cos θ sin2 φ, sin θ sin2 φ, sin φ cos φ)dθdφ
0 0
Z π/2 Z 2π
= (− sin θ sin2 φ + 3 sin φ cos φ)dθdφ
0 0
Z π/2
= 3 · 2π sin φ cos φdφ
0
π/2
1
= 6π · sin2 φ
2 0
= 3π[1 − 0] = 3π.
Higher-Dimensional Boundary Orientations
Solution.
~:
First compute the divergence of F
~) =
div(F δ
(x 2 ) + δ
(z 4 ) + δ
(e z ) = 2x + e z .
δx δy δz
Example
~ = (x 2 , z 4 , e z ) and let S be the boundary of the box [0, 2] × [0, 3] × [0, 1]
Let F
in R3 . Use the divergence theorem to calculate the flux of F ~ through S.
Solution.
~:
First compute the divergence of F
~) =
div(F δ
(x 2 ) + δ
(z 4 ) + δ
(e z ) = 2x + e z .
δx δy δz
Now apply the divergence theorem to convert the flux integral to a volume
integral:
Z Z Z 1 Z 3 Z 2
~ · dS =
F (2x + e z )dxdydz
S 0 0 0
Z 1 Z 3
= [x 2 + xe z ]2x=0 dydx
0 0
Z 1 Z 3
= (4 + 2e z )dydz
0 0
Z 1
= (12 + 6e z )dz
0
= 12 + 6e − 6 = 6(1 + e).
Consequences of Stokes’ and Divergence Theorems
Fact
Conservative vector fields have zero curl. That is:
~ = ∇V , then curl(F
If F ~ ) = ~0.
Consequences of Stokes’ and Divergence Theorems
Fact
Conservative vector fields have zero curl. That is:
~ = ∇V , then curl(F
If F ~ ) = ~0.
Proof.
Cross-partials property!
Consequences of Stokes’ and Divergence Theorems
Fact
Conservative vector fields have zero curl. That is:
~ = ∇V , then curl(F
If F ~ ) = ~0.
Proof.
Cross-partials property!
Corollary
~ is a conservative vector field, then the circulation of F
If F ~ about any simple
closed curve C is 0.
Consequences of Stokes’ and Divergence Theorems
Fact
Conservative vector fields have zero curl. That is:
~ = ∇V , then curl(F
If F ~ ) = ~0.
Proof.
Cross-partials property!
Corollary
~ is a conservative vector field, then the circulation of F
If F ~ about any simple
closed curve C is 0.
Proof. H
Stokes’ theorem implies that the circulation C F ~ · ds is equal to some surface
~
integral of the field curl(F ) = ~0, which is always 0.
(We also already know this from the fundamental theorem for conservative
vector fields.)
Consequences of Stokes’ and Divergence Theorems, contd.
Fact
Curl fields have zero divergence. That is:
~ = curl(A),
If F ~ then div(F
~ ) = 0.
Consequences of Stokes’ and Divergence Theorems, contd.
Fact
Curl fields have zero divergence. That is:
~ = curl(A),
If F ~ then div(F
~ ) = 0.
Proof.
A consequence of Clairaut’s theorem! Remember this theorem says mixed
second-order partial derivatives are equal for continuously differentiable
functions. Try working through this on your own.
Consequences of Stokes’ and Divergence Theorems, contd.
Fact
Curl fields have zero divergence. That is:
~ = curl(A),
If F ~ then div(F
~ ) = 0.
Proof.
A consequence of Clairaut’s theorem! Remember this theorem says mixed
second-order partial derivatives are equal for continuously differentiable
functions. Try working through this on your own.
Corollary
~ is the curl field of some vector field A,
If F ~ then the flux of F
~ through any
closed surface is 0.
Consequences of Stokes’ and Divergence Theorems, contd.
Fact
Curl fields have zero divergence. That is:
~ = curl(A),
If F ~ then div(F
~ ) = 0.
Proof.
A consequence of Clairaut’s theorem! Remember this theorem says mixed
second-order partial derivatives are equal for continuously differentiable
functions. Try working through this on your own.
Corollary
~ is the curl field of some vector field A,
If F ~ then the flux of F
~ through any
closed surface is 0.
Proof.
The divergence theorem says that the flux of F~ is equal to a volume integral of
~
the function div(F ), again a 0 function which gives a 0 integral.
Summary of Vector Field Operations
∇ ~ curl ~ div
f → F → G → g
Doing any two consecutive operations in a row results in zero, i.e. curl(∇f ) = ~0 and
~ )) = 0.
div(curl(F
Thanks