The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices On Turnover of Bank Employees in Bangladesh
The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices On Turnover of Bank Employees in Bangladesh
The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices On Turnover of Bank Employees in Bangladesh
71- 83
The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover of Bank Employees in Bangladesh
Khaled Mahmud1 and Sharmin Idrish2
This study empirically evaluated six Human Resource (HR) practices (realistic job information, job analysis, work family balance, career development, compensation and supervisor support) and their likely impact on the Employee Intention to Leave (EIL) in the Bangladeshi banks. The sample consisted of 233 employees working for different banks in Bangladesh. The data were gathered by administering questionnaires. The results indicated job analysis, career development, compensation, realistic job information variables were negatively and significantly correlated with EIL. Interestingly work family balance was not negatively correlated with EIL. These six variables can jointly explain 67% of the variance in EIL. Results of regressing the HR practices on EIL showed that compensation and job analysis are strong predictors of EIL.
Field of Research: Management, Human Resource Management, Employee turnover, Bank, Bangladesh.
1. Introduction
The effective performance of an organization depends not only on the available technical resources, but also on the quality and competence of its employees as required by the organization from time to time. The difference in the level of performance of two organizations depends on utilization value of employees. Moreover, the efficiency of production process and various areas of management depend to a greater extent on the level of quality employee retention and development. The term human resources refer to the knowledge, skills, creative abilities, talents, aptitude, values and beliefs of an organizations work force. The more important aspects of human resources are aptitude, values, attitudes and beliefs. But only a few companies in Bangladesh have started putting Human Resources Management systems in place that support this philosophy. Employee satisfaction is a prerequisite for staff retention. Organizations with higher staff retention rates are naturally better at retaining knowledge, which can lead to better performance and profit for the business. Improved employee satisfaction reduces the cost of staff turnover, builds brand loyalty with staff and positions the company as an employer of choice that attracts talented people to the organization. It is very important for management to have knowledge about the ways the employees are motivated. Sometimes it may be by monetary incentives or by internal factors like recognition and challenge at work.
Khaled Mahmud, Lecturer, Institute of Business Administation, University of Dhaka. Email: khaled@iba-du.edu 2 Sharmin Idrish, Institute of Business Administration, University of Dhaka. Email: blackobelisk.84@gmail.com
2. Literature Review
2.1 Employee Turnover Research Organizations invest a lot on their employees in terms of induction and training, developing, maintaining and retaining them in their organization. Therefore, managers at all costs must minimize employees turnover. Although, there is no standard framework for understanding the employees turnover process as whole, a wide range of factors have been found useful in interpreting employee turnover (Kevin, Joan & Adrian 2004). Employees are extremely crucial to the organization since their value to the organization is essentially intangible and not easily replicated (Meaghan & Nick 2002). Therefore, managers must recognize that employees as major contributors to the efficient achievement of the organizations success (Abbasi & Hollman 2000). Managers should control employee turnover for the benefit of the organization success.
72
An analysis and review of the relevant literature on the subject and the various factors highlighted by key industry personnel in the preliminary interviews, it is evident that a single model may not throw light on the multiple HRM practices influencing the turnover as identified in various studies. Therefore for ease of comprehension and measurement the following conceptual framework has been developed for the purpose of this study (Figure 1). The framework shows that employee is influenced by six (6) main HRM practices. The HRM practices are realistic job information, job analysis, career development, compensation, supervisor support and work family balance. These six (6) HR practices are labeled as the independent variables. Employee intention to leave is labeled as the dependent variable.
3. Methodology
The sample size for this study is 233 employees of 50 local and multinational banks. We have taken confidence level 99% and confidence interval 8.5 with population size more than one hundred thousand which indicates the requirement of minimum 230 samples. That justifies the sample size. Before distributing the final questionnaire the researcher checked the questionnaire with two banking to find out whether the questionnaire was 75
76
N 233 Compensation Pearson Correlation -.803** Sig. (1-tailed) .000 N 233 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
In this analysis one-tailed test was used. Each of the independent variables was tested against the dependent variable to compute the correlation. The SPSS result sheet for measuring correlation between compensation and EIL is shown in Table 2. This shows the Pearson coefficient is negative, thus the compensation is negatively correlated to EIL. Similarly the coefficients for other variables were computed and the results are summarized below: Table 3: Pearson Correlation for all selected variables and EIL No Independent variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 Realistic job information Job analysis Work family balance Career development Compensation Supervisor support Employee Turnover(Dependent variable) -0.042 -0.315 -0.016 -0.661 -0.803 -0.445
According to the Table 3, Pearson correlation coefficient suggests that there is a negative relationship between all the independent variables and EIL. The results indicated in Table 3 for work family balance does not entirely reject the relationship 77
R .816
a
df2 226
The square of the multiple R is 0.666 indicates that the 66% of variance in EIL is explained by the six independent variables jointly. The F value is 6.388 that is significant at P = 0.0005 suggesting that six independent variables have significantly explained the 67% of the variance in EIL. Table 5: The strengths of influence of independent variable on dependent variable Unstandardized Standardized Coefficients Coefficients Model 1 (Constant) Compensation Supervisor_support Job_Analysis Realistic _job _information Work _life _balance B 5.224 -.817 -.240 .099 -.043 .054 Std. Error .240 .075 .084 .079 .081 .048 .050 -.844 -.108 -.184 .072 -.042 .051 Beta T 21.751 -10.903 -1.446 -3.017 1.230 -.886 1.077 Sig. .000 .000 .149 .003 .220 .376 .282
Career_Development .121
78
2 Supervisor_support .
Model R 1 .812a
79
The results of the stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that compensation had the highest beta value and contributed 65% to the variance in EIL. Supervisor Support had the second highest beta value contributed about 1.3%. Work life balance, career development, job analysis and realistic job information were not found contributing to the total explanatory power suggesting that compensation and supervisor support explained about 67% of the variation in EIL. The relationship between the work family balance and EIL was found to be not negative. Though the literature supports the negative relationship, it was not true for employees in banks. When considering the HR practices in the model, it indicated that 66% of the variance in EIL is explained by six HR practices. It is found that realistic job information, job analysis, career development, compensation and supervisor supports have negative relationships with EIL. The findings empirically confirm the theoretical arguments explained in the literature review. Multivariate analysis suggests that two out of the six HR practices namely compensation and supervisor support were found to be explanatory factors having significant effects on EIL. Compensation was found to be the strongest HRM practice predictor of EIL. Descriptive statistics reveal that employees of banks are neutral (neither agree nor disagree) on an average about HRM practices except job analysis, where they have indicated that job analysis situation had been favorable. These results suggest that all companies should improve the HRM practices. It was impossible for six independent variables to account for variation in EIL. In fact other variables, which were not considered in this study, should be the variables that will account for the unexplained variance in the EIL. The researcher believes that the important independent variables may be HR and succession planning, due process, training, staffing, performance management, management styles. Future research studies are suggested to find out the effects of these factors on the EIL.
80
5. Conclusion
This study was limited to investigating the impact of HRM practices on EIL in Banks in Bangladesh. Further investigations in other types of industries may provide additional insights into the findings of the study. Another important limitation is that this analysis was cross-sectional in nature. Additional research is suggested to be done longitudinally in order to assess the impact of the factors over time. Work family balance and EIL was positively correlated. Findings suggest that most of the employees believe that banks are in support for work family balance. Compensation and job analysis were found to be strong HRM practice predictors of EIL. The implication of this finding is that compensation and job analysis are the most critical HRM practices to be implemented by banks to reduce EIL. The findings of this research study will be important both on the theoretical level and practical level. It was almost possible to substantiate empirically the research model developed for this study. From the perspective of the banks, these findings should assist in developing a set of HRM practices that can potentially assist a firm to reduce the degree of the EIL.
References
Abassi, SM & Hollman, KW 2000, Turnover: the real bottom line, Public Personnel Management, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 333-42. Bame, SI 1993, Organizational characteristics and administrative strategies associated with staff turnover, Health Care Management Review, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 70-86. Barrows, C 1990, Employee turnover: implications for hotel managers, FIU Hosp Rev, pp. 24-31. Batt, R & Valcour, PM 2003, Human resources practices as predictors of work family outcomes and employee turnover, Industrial Relations, vol. 42, no. 2.
81
82
83