Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 118 views

    Lagdamper

    Uploaded by

    mayureshrmahajan
    The document describes ongoing research into lag damper design for rotorcraft. The research is evaluating passive, active, and smart damper designs through modeling, experimental validation on a test rig, and implementation in a rotor performance prediction code. The goal is to improve damper performance for vibration reduction through control schemes like Higher-Harmonic Control.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Lagdamper

    Uploaded by

    mayureshrmahajan
    118 views1 page
    The document describes ongoing research into lag damper design for rotorcraft. The research is evaluating passive, active, and smart damper designs through modeling, experimental validation on a test rig, and implementation in a rotor performance prediction code. The goal is to improve damper performance for vibration reduction through control schemes like Higher-Harmonic Control.

    Original Description:

    Lag Damper, Instrumentation and vibration measurement

    Original Title

    lagdamper.ppt

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document describes ongoing research into lag damper design for rotorcraft. The research is evaluating passive, active, and smart damper designs through modeling, experimental validation on a test rig, and implementation in a rotor performance prediction code. The goal is to improve damper performance for vibration reduction through control schemes like Higher-Harmonic Control.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    118 views1 page

    Lagdamper

    Uploaded by

    mayureshrmahajan
    The document describes ongoing research into lag damper design for rotorcraft. The research is evaluating passive, active, and smart damper designs through modeling, experimental validation on a test rig, and implementation in a rotor performance prediction code. The goal is to improve damper performance for vibration reduction through control schemes like Higher-Harmonic Control.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    LAG DAMPER RESEARCH

    Brano Titurus, Nick Lieven & Peter Bunniss


    Lag damper
    research
    Passive damper
    design
    Active damper
    design
    Model
    refinement
    Model refinement for
    improved correlation with
    experimental validation
    datasets.
    Data for
    validation
    Experiments designed for
    model validation,
    parameter ID etc.
    Test rig for
    validation
    Test rig design for model
    validation, refinement and
    substructuring.
    Control
    performance
    Control performance
    studies for a range of cost
    functions, response
    quantities and flight
    conditions.
    R150
    implement.
    Algorithmic and software
    implementation of
    HHC/IBC concept and
    new damper models into
    rotor performance
    prediction code R150.
    Evaluation &
    concept
    (Semi)active damper
    concept and initial
    evaluation (damping
    capacity etc.) Model
    selection and further use
    (e.g. in R150).
    Research evolution
    Nominal
    damper model
    Evaluation &
    validation
    Smart
    damper
    Nominal
    damper model
    Parametric
    studies
    Passive
    damper
    Previous research (PhD)
    Passive damper design
    {Brano.Titurus,Nick.Lieven,Peter.Bunniss}@bristol.ac.uk
    Displacement-Force profile for sine
    excitation: 20.46 mm; 3.5 Hz.
    Velocity-Force profile for sine
    excitation: 20.46 mm; 3.5 Hz.
    Characteristic lines for 3.5 Hz.
    Model validation Lag damper on EH101
    Active damper design
    R150 implementation
    Analysis blocks
    Comparison of the damper forces and piston velocities for nominal
    and decoupled cases.
    Decoupled trimming
    Damper response change due to 5/rev COS harmonic change of the
    orifice diameter on rotor trim.
    Standard trim (constant parameter) Harmonic trim
    R
    e
    s
    p
    o
    n
    s
    e
    c
    h
    a
    n
    g
    e

    Periodic parameter variations
    Nominal damper model
    ( ) ( )
    ( ) ( ) ( )
    ( )
    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
    , , , , ,
    ,
    0 0
    1
    , ,
    i
    V i V i i V i i C i V i
    P o j V j j
    d x t
    A p b x t k x t X m
    dt
    d p
    A y sign p Q p p x Q p x
    dt V
    ,
    |
    ( = A

    A +
    ( = A A + A A

    D
    ( ) ,
    0
    P P P C D
    m y sign y A p f F
    ~
    + = A
    Basis of the model relief valve dynamics, fluid
    compressibility equation:
    Force generated by the damper:
    Refined damper model
    ( ) ( )
    ( ) ( ) ( )
    ( )
    ( )
    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
    , , , , , ,
    *
    ,
    ( )
    1
    , ,
    , ,
    i
    V i V i i V i i V i i C i V i
    P O j V j j
    E P C
    d x t
    A p R x b x t k x t X m
    dt
    d p
    A y sign p Q p p x Q p x
    dt p k k V
    ,
    |
    ( = A

    A +
    ( = A A + A A
    A
    D
    D P
    F A p = A
    Refined damper model (relief valve losses, by-pass tube
    losses, finite flexibility, effective compressibility):
    Force generated by the damper (massless piston):
    Test rig for validation
    Actuator+LVDT Load cell Lag damper
    0 0 , V |
    V p A
    p A
    L p A E p A
    ( ) y t
    0 P m ~
    Relief
    valves
    Orifice
    Attachment
    flexibility
    ( )
    ( )
    V p
    p |
    A
    A
    V p A
    p A
    L p A E p A
    ( ) P y t
    , E V p A
    ( ) V p A A
    P k C k
    ( ) y t
    0 P m ~
    ( ) y t
    ( )
    ( )
    V p
    p |
    A
    A
    ( ) O O p d A , E O p A
    ( ) V p A A
    P k C k
    O d
    0 P m ~
    Single variable
    orifice
    Modified passive design
    e.g. single variable orifice
    instead of a pair of mechanical
    relief valves
    ( )
    ( )
    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
    1
    ,
    , ,
    P O O O O
    E P C
    d p
    A y sign p Q p d d d
    dt p k k V
    ,

    |
    A +
    ( = A A =

    A
    D P
    F A p = A
    Active damper model concept
    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
    ( )
    cos sin
    O O j j
    j
    d d A j t B j t = + O + O
    Variable orifice (diameter) for trimmed flight:
    Force generated by the damper (massless piston):
    Basis of the model pressure difference evolution:
    Modified R150
    decoupled rotor-damper integration (FOH/ZOH Z-transform vs Runge-Kutta),
    continuation between trimmed states (on-line trimming) for fast evaluations,
    periodic variations of damper parameters to implement HHC/IBC schemes.
    Evaluation, analysis & modification
    Damper with variable orifice, 1/rev harmonic perturbation:
    Damper with variable orifice, 4/rev harmonic perturbation:
    ( ) ( ) 0.1 cos 1 0.2 sin 1
    O O O O
    d d d t d t = + O + O
    ( ) 0.7 sin 4
    O O O
    d d d t = + O
    Dcpl. logic
    isNext
    isID
    1
    0
    1 0
    Model ID
    Controller
    (Damper) HHC/IBC
    controller
    C
    o
    n
    t
    r
    o
    l
    l o
    g
    i c

    M
    o
    d
    a
    l
    &

    t
    r
    i m

    c
    o
    n
    v
    e
    r
    g
    e
    n
    c
    e

    I
    n
    i t
    i a
    l i s
    a
    t
    i o
    n
    s
    ,

    d
    a
    t
    a

    i n
    p
    u
    t

    P
    o
    s
    t
    -
    p
    r
    o
    c
    .
    ,

    s
    t
    r
    u
    c
    t
    .
    r
    e
    s
    p
    .

    e
    t
    c
    .

    R150
    Aero-elasticity Hydro-mechanics Control logic
    Z-transform Runge-Kutta HHC/IBC
    ROTOR DAMPER CONTROL & ID
    ( ) , ; t = x f x
    Damper v.X.X
    Higher-Harmonic/Individual Blade
    Control (HHC/IBC) schemes
    assuming sequences of trimmed
    states.
    ( ) ( ) , y t y t
    ( ) D
    F t
    A library of damper models
    for different design options
    and configurations.
    Interactive parameter change (orifice diameter) after nominal trim.
    Standard (thrust & flapping) trim 12x 12x 12x
    do=1.0 (normalised orifice diameter) do=0.2 do=1.6 do=1.0
    .
    i j
    comp z p c c
    On-line trimming
    N
    o
    m
    i n
    a
    l
    t
    r
    i m

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy