Engineering Design: BITS Pilani
Engineering Design: BITS Pilani
Engineering Design: BITS Pilani
BITS Pilani
Pilani | Dubai | Goa | Hyderabad
Dr. Nitin Kotkunde
In tr o duction
– Layout and architecture of the product their interfaces (Best possible architecture
selection).
– Proof-of-concept model
Architecture
Types
Integral Modular
• Standardization of components
• Re-configurability of devices
Pros Cons
• Improve device reconfigurability • May make devices look
• Increases the device variety and similar
speed of introduction for new • Reduces device
Modular devices performance
• Improves maintainability and • More expensive
Serviceability
• Decuples development and
manufacturing tasks
• Harder for competitor to copy the • Hinders changes of
design design in production
Integral • Tighter coupling of teams with • Reduce the varity of
less interface problems devices that can be
• Possible reduction in system cost produced.
ETZC 413 – E N G IN E ERIN G D E S IG N 10 BITS-Pilani
C o n si derations a t p r o duct a r ch itecturi ng
Modular
Architecture
Manufacturing
based Function based
modularity modularity
Original
Assembly Equipment
Conceptual
modules Manufacturin Sizable Bus
g (OEM) modules modules Slot Sectional Mix
modules
Karl Ulrich, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy 24 (1995) 419-441)
ETZC 413 – E N G IN E ERIN G D E S IG N 15 BITS-Pilani
F u n c ti on b a s ed m o dul arity: Exa m p l e
Integral trailer architecture exhibiting a one-to-one mapping from functional element to physical component
Karl Ulrich, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy 24 (1995) 419-441)
ETZC 413 – E N G IN E ERIN G D E S IG N 16 BITS-Pilani
F u n c ti on b a s ed m o dul arity: Exa m p l e
Karl Ulrich, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy 24 (1995) 419-441)
ETZC 413 – E N G IN E ERIN G D E S IG N 17 BITS-Pilani
F u n c ti on b a s ed m o dul arity: Exa m p l e
Karl Ulrich, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy 24 (1995) 419-441)
ETZC 413 – E N G IN E ERIN G D E S IG N 18 BITS-Pilani
F u n c ti on b a s ed m o dul arity: Exa m p l e
Karl Ulrich, The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm, Research Policy 24 (1995) 419-441)
ETZC 413 – E N G IN E ERIN G D E S IG N 19 BITS-Pilani
F a ctor s a ffe c ting a r ch itecture m o d ulari ty
• Product changes
Upgrade
• Product variety
• Component standardization
• Manufacturability
Flexibility
Adaptation
in use
Four possible configurations of features for a right-angle bracket. (a) Bent from a flat plate.(b) Machined from
a solid block. (c) Bracket welded from three pieces. (d) Cast bracket.
• Review the product design specification and any specifications developed for the particular
subassembly to which the component belongs.
• Establish the spatial constraints that pertain to the product or the subassembly being
designed.
• Create and refine the interfaces or connections between components. Much design effort
occurs at the connections between components, because this is the location where
failure often occurs. Identify and give special attention to the interfaces that transfer the
most critical functions.
• Before spending much time on the design, answer the following questions:
– Can the part be eliminated or combined with another part?
• Generally, the best way to get started with configuration design is to just start sketching
alternative configurations of a part (Substituting, Combining, Decomposing, Magnifying,
Minifying, Rearranging).
ETZC 413 – E N G IN E ERIN G D E S IG N 32 BITS-Pilani
An a l yz ing th e C o n fi guration D e si gn
• Performance
• Cost
• DFMA
• DFE
• Simplicity refers to a design that is not complex and is easily understood and readily
produced.
• Design guidelines:
– Force transmission
– Division of tasks
– Self-help
– Stability
Adjustable
connection
Connections
Fixed, nonadjustable
connection
Separable connection
Hinged or pivoting
connection
Locator connection
• Fatigue failure
• Stress concentrations
• Buckling
• Creep.
• Thermal deformation
• Can the form and features of the part be readily made on available production machines?
• Will material made to standard quality specifications be adequate for this part?
• Will the chosen material and manufacturing process meet the cost target for the part?
knowledge?
• Have you considered every possible unfortunate, unlikely, or unlucky event that could jeopardize the
performance of the design? Have you used a formal method like FMEA to check for this?
Refine/Optimize
• FMEA Goals:
– Evaluation of design requirements and design alternatives.
– Increasing the probability that potential failure modes and their effects on system operation have been
considered in the design/development process.
– Providing additional information to aid in the planning of thorough and efficient design improvements
and development testing.
– Providing an open issue format for recommending and tracking risk reducing action.
– Providing future references to aid in analyzing field concerns, evaluating design changes, and
developing advanced designs.
ETZC 413 – E N G IN E ERIN G D E S IG N 42 BITS-Pilani
F M EA b a s ic q u es tions
• To what extent might it fail, and what are the potential hazards produced by the
failures?
• These questions gives rise to three basic elements of FMEA: failure modes
(identification), failure effects (ramifications) and failure criticality (relative
importance of given failure states).