The Theory of Consumer Choice: DR Ashikur Rahman
The Theory of Consumer Choice: DR Ashikur Rahman
The Theory of Consumer Choice: DR Ashikur Rahman
Choice
Dr Ashikur Rahman
Utility, Total Utility and Marginal Utility
• In economics, the satisfaction or pleasure consumers derive from
the consumption of goods is called “utility”.
• Marginal utility is the utility a consumer derives from the last unit of
a good she or he consumes during a given consumption period.
Quantity
of Pepsi
B
500
E
Cannot be E
C
250
Consumer’s
budget constraint
A
0 50 100 Quantity of Pizza
• Illustration of Figure 1 (Consumer’s Budget Constraint)
• For example, if the consumer buys no pizzas, he can afford 500
pints of Pepsi (point B). If he buys no Pepsi, he can afford 100 pizzas
(point A).
• Alternately, the consumer can buy 50 pizzas and 250 pints of Pepsi
(point C).
• But the consumer cannot go out of the inner boundary of budget
line (point E).
• Any point on the budget line indicates the consumer’s
combination or tradeoff between two goods
• The slope of the budget line equals the relative price of the two
goods, that is, the ratio of price of one good compared to the
price of the other.
• It measures the rate at which a consumer trade a good for other
PREFERENCES: What a consumer wants
Quantity
of Pepsi
C
B D
I2
Indifference
A
curve, I1
0
Quantity of Pizza
Representing Preferences with Indifference Curves
• The Consumer’s Preferences
• The consumer is indifferent, or equally happy, with the
combinations shown at points A, B, and C because they
are all on the same curve.
• The Marginal Rate of Substitution
• The slope at any point on an indifference curve is the
marginal rate of substitution.
• It is the rate at which a consumer is willing to trade one good for
another.
• It is the amount of one good that a consumer requires as
compensation to give up one unit of the other good.
Figure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences
Quantity
of Pepsi MRS = MU (Piz) / MU (Pep)
= Change in Pepsi/Change in Pizza
C
B D
MRS I2
1
Indifference
A
curve, I1
0
Quantity of Pizza
Four Properties of Indifference Curves
• Property 1: Higher indifference curves are
preferred to lower ones.
• Consumers usually prefer more of something to get.
• Higher indifference curves represent larger quantities of goods than
do lower indifference curves.
Quantity
of Pepsi
C
B D
I2
Indifference
A
curve, I1
0
Quantity of Pizza
Four Properties of Indifference Curves
Quantity
of Pepsi
0
Quantity of Pizza
Figure 4 Bowed Indifference Curves
Quantity
of Pepsi
14
MRS = 6
A
8
1
4 B
MRS = 1
3
1
Indifference
curve
0 2 3 6 7
Quantity of Pizza
OPTIMIZATION: What the consumer chooses
• Consumers want to get the combination of goods on
the highest possible indifference curve.
• However, the consumer must also end up on or below
his budget constraint.
Quantity
of Pepsi
MRS =
MUPiz /MUPep= PPiz /PPep
Optimum
B
A
I3
I2
I1
Budget constraint
0
Quantity of Pizza
The Consumer’s Optimal Choice
• Consumer optimum occurs at the point where the highest indifference
curve and the budget constraint are tangent.
• The consumer chooses consumption of the two goods so that the
marginal rate of substitution equals the relative price.
• For Two-Good Rule
MUPep $PPep
--------- = ----------
MUPiz $PPiz
How Changes in Income Affect the Consumer’s
Choices
• An increase in income shifts the budget constraint
outward.
• The consumer is able to choose a better combination of
goods on a higher indifference curve.
• Normal versus Inferior Goods
• If a consumer buys more of a good when his or her income
rises, the good is called a normal good (+)
• If a consumer buys less of a good when his or her income
rises, the good is called an inferior good (-).
Figure 7 An Increase in Income
Quantity
of Pepsi New budget constraint
New optimum
3. . . . and
Pepsi
consumption. Initial
optimum I2
Initial
budget
I1
constraint
0 Quantity
of Pizza
2. . . . raising pizza consumption . . .
Figure 8 An Inferior Good
Quantity
of Pepsi New budget constraint
Initial
budget I1 I2
constraint
0
Quantity of Pizza
2. . . . pizza consumption rises, making pizza a normal good . . .
How Changes in Prices Affect Consumer’s
Choices
• A fall in the price of any good rotates the budget constraint outward
and changes the slope of the budget constraint.
• Substitute the cheaper goods if price of one goods increase relative
to another
Figure 9 A Change in Price
Quantity
of Pepsi
New optimum
B 1. A fall in the price of Pepsi rotates
500
the budget constraint outward . . .
3. . . . and
raising Pepsi Initial optimum
consumption.
Initial I2
budget I1
constraint A
0 100
Quantity of Pizza
2. . . . reducing pizza consumption . . .
Summary
• A consumer’s budget constraint shows the possible
combinations of different goods he can buy given his income
and the prices of the goods.
• The slope of the budget constraint equals the relative price of
the goods.
• The consumer’s indifference curves represent his preferences.
• Points on higher indifference curves are preferred to points on
lower indifference curves.
• The slope of an indifference curve at any point is the
consumer’s marginal rate of substitution.
• A consumer optimizes by choosing the point on his budget
constraint that lies on the highest indifference curve.
Summary
• When the price of a good falls, the impact on the
consumer’s choices can be broken down into an income
effect and a substitution effect.
The two effects of a price change:
• Income effect:
Normal good (+)
Inferior goods (-)
• Substitution effect
Happens as Price of Pepsi decreases, Pizza became
comparatively expensive
Consumer buy less Pizza and substituting it with Pepsi until
the optimizing condition is restored (-)