The Theory of Consumer Choice: DR Ashikur Rahman

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 26

The Theory of Consumer

Choice

Dr Ashikur Rahman
Utility, Total Utility and Marginal Utility
• In economics, the satisfaction or pleasure consumers derive from
the consumption of goods is called “utility”.

• Total utility is the total utility a consumer derives from the


consumption of all units of a good over a given consumption
period.

• Marginal utility is the utility a consumer derives from the last unit of
a good she or he consumes during a given consumption period.

• Total utility = Sum of marginal utilities


• The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility
Over a given consumption period, as more and more of a good is
consumed by a consumer, beyond a certain point, the marginal
utility of additional units begins to fall.
Total and Marginal Utility for Ice Cream
Total Utility Q ($) TU ($) MU
200
0 0
150
1 40 40
2 85 45
100
3 120 35
50
4 140 20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 150 10
6 157 7
Marginal Utility 7 160 3
50
8 160 0
40 9 155 -5
30
20
10 145 -10
10 145
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
-10
How much ice cream does Jill buy
-20
in a month?
BUDGET CONSTRAINT: What a consumer can afford

• The budget constraint depicts the limit on the consumption


“bundles” that a consumer can afford.

• People consume less than they desire because their


spending is constrained by their income.

• Budget constraint shows various combinations of goods


the consumer can afford given his or her income and the
prices of the two goods.

• If a consumer wants to spend $ 1,000 on Pepsi and pizza,


where price of Pepsi is $ 2 and Pizza is $10, then probable
combinations would be:
Probable combinations of Pepsi and Pizza
under Budget Constraint
Figure 1 The Consumer’s Budget Constraint

Quantity
of Pepsi
B
500

E
Cannot be E

C
250

Consumer’s
budget constraint

A
0 50 100 Quantity of Pizza
• Illustration of Figure 1 (Consumer’s Budget Constraint)
• For example, if the consumer buys no pizzas, he can afford 500
pints of Pepsi (point B). If he buys no Pepsi, he can afford 100 pizzas
(point A).
• Alternately, the consumer can buy 50 pizzas and 250 pints of Pepsi
(point C).
• But the consumer cannot go out of the inner boundary of budget
line (point E).
• Any point on the budget line indicates the consumer’s
combination or tradeoff between two goods
• The slope of the budget line equals the relative price of the two
goods, that is, the ratio of price of one good compared to the
price of the other.
• It measures the rate at which a consumer trade a good for other
PREFERENCES: What a consumer wants

• A consumer’s preference among consumption bundles


may be illustrated with indifference curves.
• An indifference curve is a curve that shows
consumption bundles that give the consumer the same
level of satisfaction
Figure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences

Quantity
of Pepsi
C

B D
I2
Indifference
A
curve, I1
0
Quantity of Pizza
Representing Preferences with Indifference Curves
• The Consumer’s Preferences
• The consumer is indifferent, or equally happy, with the
combinations shown at points A, B, and C because they
are all on the same curve.
• The Marginal Rate of Substitution
• The slope at any point on an indifference curve is the
marginal rate of substitution.
• It is the rate at which a consumer is willing to trade one good for
another.
• It is the amount of one good that a consumer requires as
compensation to give up one unit of the other good.
Figure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences

Quantity
of Pepsi MRS = MU (Piz) / MU (Pep)
= Change in Pepsi/Change in Pizza
C

B D
MRS I2
1
Indifference
A
curve, I1
0
Quantity of Pizza
Four Properties of Indifference Curves
• Property 1: Higher indifference curves are
preferred to lower ones.
• Consumers usually prefer more of something to get.
• Higher indifference curves represent larger quantities of goods than
do lower indifference curves.

• Property 2: Indifference curves are downward


sloping.
• A consumer is willing to give up one good only if he or she gets
more of the other good in order to remain equally happy.
• If the quantity of one good is reduced, the quantity of the other good
must increase.
• For this reason, most indifference curves slope downward.
Figure 2 The Consumer’s Preferences

Quantity
of Pepsi
C

B D
I2
Indifference
A
curve, I1
0
Quantity of Pizza
Four Properties of Indifference Curves

• Property 3: Indifference curves do not cross.


• Points A and B should make the consumer equally happy.
• Points B and C should make the consumer equally happy.
• This implies that A and C would make the consumer equally happy.
• But C has more of both goods compared to A.
• Property 4: Indifference curves are bowed inward.
• People are more willing to trade away goods that they have in
abundance and less willing to trade away goods of which they have
little.
• These differences in a consumer’s marginal substitution rates cause
his or her indifference curve to bow inward.
Figure 3 The Impossibility of Intersecting Indifference Curves

Quantity
of Pepsi

0
Quantity of Pizza
Figure 4 Bowed Indifference Curves

Quantity
of Pepsi

14

MRS = 6

A
8
1

4 B
MRS = 1
3
1
Indifference
curve

0 2 3 6 7
Quantity of Pizza
OPTIMIZATION: What the consumer chooses
• Consumers want to get the combination of goods on
the highest possible indifference curve.
• However, the consumer must also end up on or below
his budget constraint.

The Consumer’s Optimal Choices


• Combining the indifference curve and the
budget constraint determines the consumer’s
optimal choice.
Figure 6 The Consumer’s Optimum

Quantity
of Pepsi
MRS =
MUPiz /MUPep= PPiz /PPep
Optimum

B
A

I3
I2
I1

Budget constraint
0
Quantity of Pizza
The Consumer’s Optimal Choice
• Consumer optimum occurs at the point where the highest indifference
curve and the budget constraint are tangent.
• The consumer chooses consumption of the two goods so that the
marginal rate of substitution equals the relative price.
• For Two-Good Rule
MUPep $PPep
--------- = ----------
MUPiz $PPiz
How Changes in Income Affect the Consumer’s
Choices
• An increase in income shifts the budget constraint
outward.
• The consumer is able to choose a better combination of
goods on a higher indifference curve.
• Normal versus Inferior Goods
• If a consumer buys more of a good when his or her income
rises, the good is called a normal good (+)
• If a consumer buys less of a good when his or her income
rises, the good is called an inferior good (-).
Figure 7 An Increase in Income

Quantity
of Pepsi New budget constraint

1. An increase in income shifts the


budget constraint outward . . .

New optimum

3. . . . and
Pepsi
consumption. Initial
optimum I2

Initial
budget
I1
constraint

0 Quantity
of Pizza
2. . . . raising pizza consumption . . .
Figure 8 An Inferior Good

Quantity
of Pepsi New budget constraint

1. When an increase in income shifts the


3. . . . but budget constraint outward . . .
Initial
Pepsi
optimum
consumption
falls, making
New optimum
Pepsi an
inferior good.

Initial
budget I1 I2
constraint
0
Quantity of Pizza
2. . . . pizza consumption rises, making pizza a normal good . . .
How Changes in Prices Affect Consumer’s
Choices
• A fall in the price of any good rotates the budget constraint outward
and changes the slope of the budget constraint.
• Substitute the cheaper goods if price of one goods increase relative
to another
Figure 9 A Change in Price

Quantity
of Pepsi

New budget constraint


1,000 D

New optimum
B 1. A fall in the price of Pepsi rotates
500
the budget constraint outward . . .
3. . . . and
raising Pepsi Initial optimum
consumption.
Initial I2
budget I1
constraint A
0 100
Quantity of Pizza
2. . . . reducing pizza consumption . . .
Summary
• A consumer’s budget constraint shows the possible
combinations of different goods he can buy given his income
and the prices of the goods.
• The slope of the budget constraint equals the relative price of
the goods.
• The consumer’s indifference curves represent his preferences.
• Points on higher indifference curves are preferred to points on
lower indifference curves.
• The slope of an indifference curve at any point is the
consumer’s marginal rate of substitution.
• A consumer optimizes by choosing the point on his budget
constraint that lies on the highest indifference curve.
Summary
• When the price of a good falls, the impact on the
consumer’s choices can be broken down into an income
effect and a substitution effect.
The two effects of a price change:
• Income effect:
Normal good (+)
Inferior goods (-)
• Substitution effect
Happens as Price of Pepsi decreases, Pizza became
comparatively expensive
Consumer buy less Pizza and substituting it with Pepsi until
the optimizing condition is restored (-)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy