Economics: The Theory of Consumer Choice
Economics: The Theory of Consumer Choice
Economics: The Theory of Consumer Choice
PRINCIPLES OF
ECONOMICS
FOURTH EDITION
N. G R E G O R Y M A N K I W
PowerPoint® Slides
by Ron Cronovich
Slope = –5 D
200
Consumer must
give up 5 Pepsis 100
to get another
pizza. 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 Pizzas
CHAPTER 21 THE THEORY OF CONSUMER CHOICE 7
The Slope of the Budget Constraint
The slope of the budget constraint equals
• the rate at which the consumer
can trade Pepsi for pizza
• the opportunity cost of pizza in terms of Pepsi
• the relative price of pizza:
Indifference curve:
shows consumption bundles
that give the consumer the
same level of satisfaction
21
A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 3:
Answers
The Effects of a Price Change
23
The Income and Substitution Effects
A fall in the price of Pepsi has two effects on the
optimal consumption of both goods.
• Income effect
A fall in the price of Pepsi boosts the purchasing
power of the consumer’s income, allowing him to
reach a higher indifference curve.
• Substitution effect
A fall in the price of Pepsi makes pizza more
expensive relative to Pepsi, causes consumer to
buy less pizza & more Pepsi.
25
A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 4:
Income & substitution effects
The two goods are skis and ski bindings.
Suppose the price of skis falls.
Determine the effects on the consumer’s
demand for both goods if
• income effect > substitution effect
• income effect < substitution effect
Which case do you think is more likely?
26
A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 4:
Answers
A fall in the price of skis
Income effect:
demand for skis rises
demand for ski bindings rises
Substitution effect:
demand for skis rises
demand for ski bindings falls
The substitution effect is likely to be small,
because skis and ski bindings are complements.
27
The Substitution Effect for
Substitutes and Complements
The substitution effect is huge when the goods are
very close substitutes.
• If Pepsi goes on sale, people who are nearly
indifferent between Coke and Pepsi will buy
mostly Pepsi.
The substitution effect is tiny when goods are
nearly perfect complements.
• If software becomes more expensive relative to
computers, people are not likely to buy less
software and use the savings to buy more
computers.
CHAPTER 21 THE THEORY OF CONSUMER CHOICE 28
Deriving the Demand Curve for Pepsi
Left graph: price of Pepsi falls from $2 to $1
Right graph: Pepsi demand curve
For
For this
this person,
person, So
So her
her labor
labor supply
supply
SE
SE >> IE
IE increases
increases with
with the
the wage
wage
For
For this
this person,
person, So
So his
his labor
labor supply
supply falls
falls
SE
SE << IE
IE when
when thethe wage
wage rises
rises
At
At the
the optimum,
optimum,
the
the MRS
MRS between
between
current
current and
and future
future
consumption
consumption equals
equals
the
the interest
interest rate.
rate.
40
A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 5:
Answers
The interest rate rises.
Substitution effect
• Current consumption becomes more expensive
relative to future consumption.
• Current consumption falls, saving rises,
future consumption rises.
Income effect
• Can afford more consumption in both the present
and the future. Saving falls.
41
Application 3: Interest Rates and Saving
In
In this
this case,
case,
SE
SE >> IEIE and
and
saving
saving rises
rises
43
CONCLUSION:
Do People Really Think This Way?
Most people do not make spending decisions
by writing down their budget constraints and
indifference curves.
Yet, they try to make the choices that maximize
their satisfaction given their limited resources.
The theory in this chapter is only intended as a
metaphor for how consumers make decisions.
It does fairly well at explaining consumer behavior
in many situations, and provides the basis for
more advanced economic analysis.
CHAPTER 21 THE THEORY OF CONSUMER CHOICE 44
CHAPTER SUMMARY
A consumer’s budget constraint shows the
possible combinations of different goods she can
buy given her income and the prices of the goods.
The slope of the budget constraint equals the
relative price of the goods.
An increase in income shifts the budget constraint
outward. A change in the price of one of the
goods pivots the budget constraint.