Intro To Public Safety
Intro To Public Safety
Intro To Public Safety
Components Activities
4. Solving
Community
Problems
5. Managing Inspection and monitoring
Change
Proposed roles of the police
• Police to support the planning process of Barangay POCs,
which will be part of the Barangay Development Plan
• Police to gather data about the barangays
• Police includes BPOPS in their plans
• Police to provide inputs to POPS planning
10 Steps in Developing
and Monitoring the
Implementation of Peace and
Order and Public Safety Plan
Step 1: Convene POC
81 Provinces
145 Cities
1,489 Municipalities
Definition of Terms
Failure to submit
quarterly Late filing of
accomplishment request
report
Chapter B
Peace and Order and Public Safety Situation
Focus Area Indicator Actual Indicator/Information
(Sector/Service Area)
Municipal/ Barangay Cases/
City (if Qualitative
available) Data
• CNN
• Terrorism
• Armed Lawless Groups (ALG)
Bandits, Clan Wars
• IP Related Incidents
• Clan/Tribal Wars
Focus Area Indicator Actual Indicator/Information
(Sector/Service Area)
Municipal/ Baranga Cases/
City y (if Qualitati
availabl ve Data
e)
2. PUBLIC SAFETY
A. Emergency/Crisis • Number of High Value Targets
Management • Number and type of vital installations/lifelines
and Fire Safety • Number and type of resources available
resources to respond to an emergency (e.g.
human/physical/financial resources)/Number
and type of needed resources
• Objectives – Outcome
• Activities – Outputs
Indicators
• Indicators are standards against which change can be
measured/ performance determined. They specify
realistic targets for measuring or judging the achievement
of each objective (or activity). They are objective
measures that lead any observer to the same conclusion.
They provide the basis for review, monitoring and
evaluation, results of which are used to better manage
implementation and plan for subsequent activities. The
process of setting indicators contributes to transparency,
consensus and ownership of the overall objectives and
plan.
Characteristics of developed indicators
(SMART)
• S- specific
• M- measurable
• A- achievable
• R- realistic
• T- timely / time
bound
Characteristics of indicators
(SPICED)
• Subjective: key informants (beneficiaries/stakeholders) have
a special position or experience that gives them unique
insights which may yield high return time-wise. What may be
seen by some as 'anecdotal evidence' becomes critical data
because of the source's value
• Participatory: indicators should be developed together with
those best placed to assess them, ie. with the project's
ultimate beneficiaries, local staff and other stakeholders
Amount
2. Allocate LCE September December included in
‘substantial 2016 2016 LDIP
amount’
Monitoring
3. Establish ADAC April 2017 October 2017 guidelines
monitoring and
mechanism templates
with rewards
Strategy PPSAs Lead/ Main Schedule of Implementation Expected
Impelmentin Output
g Group
Conduct of
Anti-Illegal
Drug
Operations
Strengthen
accountability
of law
enforcers
6
Chapter F
Funding Requirements
Funding POPS
• Local Development Investment Program
– Principal instrument for implementing the CDP.
– It is a document that translates the CDP into
programs and projects within a 3-year timeframe
and selects those that will be picked up by the LGU
for funding in the annual general fund budget and
through special fund generation schemes.
– Basis for the budget document in DBM’s Budget
Operations Manual
• Annual Investment Plan/Program – annual
component of LDIP
Legislative Requirements
• Legislative Requirements – priority legislations that
need to be enacted or current legislation that need to
be amended by the Sanggunian to support
implementation of program or project
Start
Date
Compl
etion
P M C Total
Date S O O
O
E
Chapter G
Implementation Arrangements and
Annual Implementation Plan
Table G.1: Implementation Arrangements
Collaboration Matrix: Conduct of drug clearing operations
Organization/ LGU PNP BADAC
Responsibility
Started Compl
eted
b. Emergency/Crisis
Management and Fire Safety
TOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
Chapter H
POPS Plan Monitoring and Evaluation
and Reporting
Table H: Indicators Profile
Objective Indicator Definition Source Frequency Data
of Data In-Charge
Collection
Communicating Results
WHO ARE STAKEHOLDERS?
• Any person, group, or organization that can place a claim on the organization’s
resources, attention, or output, or is affected by its output (Bryson 1995: 27)
• All parties who will be affected by or will affect strategy (Nutt and Backoff
1992: 439)
• People or small groups with the power to respond to, negotiate with, and
change the strategic future of the organization (Eden and Ackerman 1998: 117)
• Those individuals or groups who depend on the organization to fulfill their own
goals and on whom, in turn, the organization depends (Johnson and Scholes
2002: 206)
Stakeholder analysis- a means for identifying who the organization’s are,
how they evaluate the organization, how they influence the organization,
what the organization needs from them, and how important they are
(Bryson)
BASIC STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS:
POWER VS. INTEREST GRID
S1
S3
Sn
Questions to ask:
Who are affected (in terms of benefit or harm) by the project or issue at hand?
Who have the power to influence (help or hinder)?
Who have knowledge and information about the issue?
Who could oppose?
BASIC STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS:
POWER VS. INTEREST GRID
LEVEL OF INTEREST
High
SUBJECTS PLAYERS
Low
Low High
Source: Eden and Ackerman (1998: 2)
LEVEL OF POWER
BASIC STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS:
POWER VS. INTEREST GRID (BRYSON)
SUBJECTS PLAYERS
CONTEXT SETTERS
CROWD
Show consideration
Make use of interest thru
Low
Least important
involvement in low risk
Inform via general
areas
communications
Keep informed & consult
Aim to move into right
on interest area
hand box
Potential supporter/
goodwill ambassador
LEVEL OF POWER
Table I: Communication Plan
Ref. PPSAs Communic Audience Key Message Media Budget
ation Channels
Objective
CHAPTER J
POPS Plan Summary
Table J. POPS Summary
POPS Obj Indicat Basel Targe Strategi PPSAs Expec Office(r)
Challenges/Issues ecti or ine t by es ted Primaril
Funding Requirements
ve ____ Outp y
_ uts Respon
sible Sour Year Year Year Tota
ce 1 2 3 l
2.Conflict
B.PUBLIC SAFETY
2.Emergency/Crisis
Management and Fire
Safety
ROLL OUT ACTION
PLAN
POPS ACTION PLAN ABRA
PERSON
PPSA TIMEFRAME FUNDING REMARKS
RESPONSIBLE
Orientation on POPS Plan DILG Sept. 13-17, 2016
(Governor)
Orientation on POPS Plan DILG 4th week of September 2016 P6,500.00 -Meals and snacks
Preparation to MLGOOs (1 day)
-During Provincial Management
Conference
Orientation on POPS Plan PNP Last Monday of September 2016 P3,000.00 -Meals and snacks
Preparation to COPs (1 day)
-During Command Conference
Orientation on POPS Plan during DILG/PNP October 2016 P20,000.00 Meals, snacks, and supplies
MPOC Meeting (POC Fund)
Organization of POPSP TWG LGU/DILG/PNP October 2016 c/o P/MLGU – Office of the
(Provincial and Municipal Levels) Governor/Mayor
Venue = P10,000.00
Conduct of POPS Planning DILG/PNP October – December 2016 TOTAL: P969,600.00 Participants:
Orientation and Workshop Barangay Captains, Brgy.
(Barangay Level) Meals and Snacks = P606,000.00 Kagawad Chair on Peace and
Order, Brgy. Secretaries
Supplies = P363,600.00
Monitor formulation of DILG/PNP Oct. – Dec. 2016 P 81,000.00 P1,000.00 x 27 LGUs x 3 months
Provincial/Municipal POPSP