Strain Measurement with Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors

by Manfred Kreuzer
HBM, Darmstadt, Germany

Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors (FBGS) are gaining increasing attention in the field of experimental stress
analysis. They are very well suited to the new materials of glass and carbon fiber reinforced composites
which are often used for highly stressed constructions, e.g. in airplanes and wind power plants. Basically,
Fiber Optic Bragg Sensors are strain-measuring devices and therefore provide many of the advantages
of the well known metal foil strain gages. This paper gives a short introduction to FBG sensors, points out
their special strengths and weaknesses and describes a measuring system which enables strain gages
and FBGS to be measured simultaneously, providing all data processing functions originally developed
for the strain gages also for the FBGS signals, like signal conditioning, rosette calculations, filtering,
Fourier transformation, free definable mathematics etc. Such systems are especially useful in tests were
both strain gages and FBGS are used.

1. Short History of Optical Fibers

The history of optical fibers reaches back to the 1960ties.
In 1969, first gradient index fibers were manufactured by the
cooperation of Nippon Sheet Glass Co. and Nippon Electric
Co. for telecommunication applications. But these fibers still
had a damping of 100 dB/km caused mainly by chemical
impurity of the glass. Great progress was made in the
following years and in 1976 improved fibers with <1dB/km
were available in Japan, USA and Great Britain. Infrared was
used then instead of visible light. Today the damping is <0.2
dB/km. The best suited glass for fibers is fused silica (SiO2)
[1].
In 1978, Ken O. Hill found the effect of photo sensitivity for
Germanium doped fibers. Exposure to ultraviolet light
induces a permanent change of the refractive index. The
next step was to use this effect and write Bragg gratings into
fibers which then can reflect very small wavelength peaks.
The wavelengths of these peaks change with temperature
or when such fibers are strained. First commercial Fiber
Bragg Grating Sensors were available in 1995 from 3M and
Photonetics. Since 2000 more than 20 companies offer
Fiber Bragg Gratings.

2. Features of Fiber Bragg Gratings

Because FBG sensors can measure strain (and not
displacement) they also provide the superior advantages of
the strain measuring principle, as metal foil strain gages do.
Like strain gages, FBG can be used to build transducers for
measuring many different physical quantities. But this is not
the subject of this paper. In the following only the
characteristics of the FBG will be explained.
Though FBG cannot fully compete with metal strain gages
regarding price and precision, they provide some superior
qualities making them very suited to special applications:
FBG match quite well with new composite materials like
glass or carbon fiber reinforced composites which are
widely used in modern constructions, like new airplanes or
in wind power plants. FBG can directly be integrated into
composites or can be fixed directly or as patches on the
surface of the test object like normal strain gages.
FBG can measure very high strain (>10,000 m/m) and
are therefore very well suited to highly stressed composite
constructions.

FBG are small sized and lightweight

FBG are immune to electromagnetic interference (even
lightning interference)
FBG are intrinsically passive (no electrical power
necessary); and therefore can be positioned in high
voltage and potentially explosive atmosphere areas
FBG signals are not distance-dependent (up to >50 km
connection length is possible)
On a single fiber many Fiber Bragg Gratings can be
located in a row (>20 FBG; with special interrogator
technologies up to >100). No return fiber is needed (but
often preferred because of redundancy reasons)
Long term stability is very high
Good corrosion resistance
Special versions of FBGS can be used at very high
temperatures (>700 C)
FBG are also advantageously used in cryogenic
environment because of their low thermal conductivity of
the single fiber feeding many sensors and their stable
optical properties with very low residual temperature
dependencies near to liquid helium temperatures.
Very low magnetic field interactions
Ease of installation (time, cabling, testing)
Of course there are also some properties that have to be
mentioned where FBGS show some weaknesses:
FBG show high temperature dependence (/0 caused
by 1C is equivalent to /0 caused by 8 m/m
mechanical strain). Temperature compensated FBGS are
not yet available. Temperature compensation requires
special arrangements and read-out of two FBG
FBG cannot provide self-compensation of apparent
strain (thermal expansion coefficient of steel, aluminum
or fiber composites). Temperature compensation has to be
done by separate temperature-measuring channels and
corresponding calculations.
FBG show high sensitivity to lateral forces or pressure
causing light birefringence. The refraction coefficient
becomes different for the 0 and 90 axis of polarized light,
resulting in two separate reflection peaks.
However, depolarized light and optical peak shaping in the
polychromater based FBG sensor system (Chpt. 7, Fig.11)
can solve this problem.

 Gage factor is only k = 0.78 (0.77 0.81) and can be

different from fiber type to fiber type.
The small size of strain gages cannot be reached with
FBG patches
The stiffness of FBG sensors is higher than that of foil
strain gages causing higher parallel force to the specimen.
The sensing fiber core is positioned at a greater distance
from the specimen surface. This can cause calibration
errors when the patch is applied on curved surfaces.
The radius of the fiber should be >10 mm; FBG rosettes
therefore tend to be quite large
Interrogator instruments for FBG sensors are still
expensive (however with many sensors per interrogator the
channel cost including installations can be lower than foil
strain gages).

Fig. 2: Fiber Bragg Grating schematic

Each single fringe reflects a very small part of all incoming
wavelength. The reflection factor per single fringe is in the
range of only 0.001% 0.1% depending on how much
energy was used to write the Bragg grating and on the
percentage of Germanium doping of the fiber core.

3. Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors (FBGS)

Bragg gratings are written into so called single-mode
fibers. These fibers consist of a very small inner core of 4 to
9 m diameter and an outer part (cladding) of pure glass
(SiO2) of 125 m diameter. The core has a higher refraction
index caused by high Germanium doping. The difference of
refraction indexes between inner core and cladding causes
the light to propagate only inside the small core. The glass
fiber is coated with acrylate, polyimide or ORMOCER
(organic modulated ceramic) to protect it especially against
water and hydrogen which causes crack growing and can
reduce the mechanical stability (the breaking point may
decrease from >30,000 m/m to only 5,000 .1,000 m/m).
To write the Bragg grating into the fiber core the fiber must
first be dismantled of the coating and afterwards newly
coated. This process has to be done very thoroughly,
otherwise the mechanical stability of the fiber may suffer
severely and the fiber may break already at low strain
levels.
To measure strain the sensors must be fixed to the
specimen, typically by gluing.
Stretching a strain gage sensor causes a change in
resistance of the metal grid (Fig. 1).

Fig 1: Strain gage schematic

Stretching a Fiber Optic Bragg sensor causes a change in
grating period (Fig. 2) resulting in a change in wavelength of
the reflected ultraviolet light.
Bragg gratings reflect wavelengths which have very small
bandwidths (so-called peaks in the spectrum).
The grating consists not only of some fringes as shown in
Fig. 2 but of several thousand fringes.

Fig. 3:

Functional principle of Fiber Bragg Gratings

Because each single fringe reflects light with different

phase shifts, interference occurs and most of the light is
being erased. But the reflections with equal phase shift
accumulate to a strong reflection peak. The reflection of
the whole grating is the sum of all these thousands of very
small single reflections. Fig. 3 explains this behavior in
more detail. Top of Fig. 3 shows a fiber with a 10-fringe
Bragg grating. Light enters from the left side. Below there
are three light beams with different wavelengths. The
upper one has precisely the wavelength of the grating
period and all single fringe reflections are reflected in
phase and therefore add up to an energy level of 10 times
a single grid reflection. The next light beam below has a
10% higher frequency so that 11 light periods have the
length of the 10 grid periods. All single reflections
therefore have different phases, they interfere and
compensate each other to zero resulting in a pole of the
reflection function. The same happens with the lowest light
beam which has a 10% lower frequency so that 9 light
periods have the length of 10 grid periods.
What happens when the entering light differs from the grid
count by +1.5? Then the phase vectors turn +1.5 times
(+540) over the total length of the grating. The first
vectors in the 360 turn interfere to zero and the vectors of
the remaining half turn accumulate, but the sum must be
multiplied by 2/ because the reflected light vectors of
these fringes differ in phase from 0 to 180 . Therefore
the amplitude of the first side lobe is 2/(3), for the next
side lobe 2/(5) and so on. The function of the reflection
is a sin(x)/x-function.

Fig. 4: Calculated normalized reflection of low reflecting

Bragg gratings ( <20% reflection) of 6 mm
length and = 1550 nm wavelength
Fig. 4 shows the calculated spectral reflection of a 6-mm
grating with 1550 nm peak wavelength.
This simple theory complies quite well with low reflective
Bragg gratings (<20% peak reflection factor) while the
theory of high reflective Bragg gratings (>90% peak
reflection factor) is much more difficult and not a subject of
this paper. However, a commentary about these two
different kinds of FBG follows in chapter 4. The calculation
of the spectral function of low reflective Bragg gratings will
be explained next:
The specified wavelength of a FBG is the wavelength in
vacuum. Inside a fiber the wavelength is shorter (divided by
the refraction index of glass). Because the reflected light
travels forth and back, reflected light beams of the single
grids are in phase if an integer of light wavelength fits into
two times the grid distance.
The grid spacing Gs therefore calculates:

Gs =

Fig. 5: A 6-mm Bragg grating (15% reflection)

measured with interrogator sm125 from Micron Optics
Equation (3) inserted into equation (4) gives:

Pd =

(0 ) 2
2 * n * Gl

(5)

The result is a pole distance Pd = 137 pm. The main peak

has twice the width (274 pm) from pole to pole. The whole
function of the reflected spectrum Ri can be calculated
according to equation (6).

Ri =

* N * i

* sin(

* N * i
)
0

(6)

The wavelength i of the x-axis is i = o + i . i runs

over a range of 1000 pm in Fig. 4, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6.

(1)

2*n

Peak wavelength is 0, n is the refraction index of the fiber.

(n=1.46, typical for FBG and 0 = 1550 nm
Gs = 530 nm).
Vice versa by altering the grid spacing Gs the wavelength of
the reflected peak can be changed.
With a given length of the grating, e.g. Gl = 6 mm, the fringe
count N can be calculated as:

N=

Gl
Gs

(2)

Equation (1) inserted into equation (2) gives:

N=

2 * n * Gl

Fig. 6: Same function as in Fig. 4 , only y-axis is

logarithmic
(3)

The result is N = 11300 grids (0 = 1550 nm, Gl = 6 mm).

Because light frequencies with wave counts of N +1 per
grating length interfere to zero, the pole distance Pd of the
wavelength spectrum calculates:

Pd =

0
N

Normally the width of the reflection peak is not defined by

the pole-to-pole distance but by the definition of FWHM
(Full-Width-Half-Maximum) that is the width at 50% of the
main peak level. The function sin(x)/x is equal to 0.5 for x
= 1.8955. The FWHM can then be calculated according to
equation (7).

FWHM = 2 *
Pd = 137 pm

(4)

1.8955 * 0
*N

(7)

FWHM = 1,2067 * Pd
3

Equation (3) inserted into equation (7) gives:

FWHM =

1.8955 * 0
* n * Gl

(8)

n = refraction index (1.46); GL = grating length (6 mm);

0 = 1550 nm FWHM = 165 pm
Fig. 5 shows a real measured spectrum of a 6-mm FBG. An
interrogator sm125 from Micron Optics Inc. was used.
Fig. 6 is the calculated spectrum. Both measured spectrum
and calculated spectrum
show almost identical
characteristics. Only the deep poles in the calculated plot
are different. The reason for this is that the interrogator
obviously cannot follow the very fast signal slopes of the
poles.

4. Two Different Methods to Induce Fiber

Optic Bragg Gratings
Excimer laser with wavelengths of about 240250 nm
are used to induce the Bragg gratings. The interference
pattern can be generated with the help of a phase mask
(see Fig. 7) or by splitting laser beams (see Fig. 8).
The standard procedure to make high reflective FBGS
(>90% peak reflectivity) is to dismantle a standard telecom
fiber (remove the acrylate or polyimide coating), expose the
fiber to the ultraviolet interference pattern and then embed it
again in a suited coating.

Fig. 8:

The preferred coating material of this process is

ORMOCER (organic modulated ceramic) because its
Youngs modulus is comparatively high. Such sensors can
be obtained from FBGS Technology GmbH Jena.
Because the exposure is done on the fly only one single
inscription UV-laser flash is triggered for each Bragg
grating. The flash time has to be very short (nano-second
range) to get precise gratings. Therefore the total energy
of the exposure is only approximately 1/1000 of the high
2
reflective FBGSs in the range of several hundred mJ/cm .
However, since the photo sensitivity of the fiber core is
very high at low energy levels, a reflectivity of 10%.20%
can still be achieved.

Fig. 9:
Fig. 7: Bragg grating induced by a laser and a phase mask
If the FBGS are to measure strain, polyimide coating is the
right choice because acrylate is too soft and cannot
precisely transfer the strain from the specimen to the fiber;
especially not at high temperatures. The energy of the
2
exposure is in the range of several hundred J/cm causing a
0.01% .0.1% change of the refraction index. While
standard communication fibers may be strained up to
60,000 m/m the high reflective Bragg fibers break very
often already at much lower strains. This is caused by the
dismantling procedure which must be done very carefully.
To avoid this problem a second method was developed to
produce FBGS.
The inscription of the Bragg gratings is done on the fly
during the fiber pulling process (see Fig. 8) and after that
the fiber is being embedded into the coating. No subsequent
dismantling process is then required.

FBG gratings produced on the fly

Reflection peaks of a high reflective (left) and a

low reflective (right) Fiber Optic Bragg Sensor

Fig. 9 shows typical reflection peaks of low and high

reflective FBGS. The spectrum of the low reflective FBG
(20%) on the right side looks pretty much like the
theoretical function, and the peak width (FWHM) is small.
On the left side of Fig. 9 the response of a high reflective
(>90%) FBG show a much broader peak and almost no
side lobs. The side lobs can be suppressed by apodizing,
that means the energy of the inscription process is
modulated in form of a Gaussian distribution over the
length of the grating.
High reflective FBG sometimes also show unwanted
smaller disturbance peaks like the small one in the middle
of Fig 9 which is generated by the same grating as the left
main peak.

5. Temperature and Strain Sensitivity

The wavelength of a FBGS changes with strain and
temperature according to equation (9)

= k * + * T

(9)

= wavelength shift

n / n
T

(11)

k * glass +

(18)

= k * m + (k * sp + ) * T

m =

(19)

1
*
( sp + ) * T
k 0
k

(20)

Equation for a strain-measuring FBGS

= m + T

(12)

m = mechanically caused strain

T = temperature caused strain
T = sp

(13)

sp = expansion coefficient per K of the specimen

Equations (10) to (13) inserted into equation (9) lead to
equations (14) and (15) which describe the behavior of a
FBGS under the impact of both strain and temperature.

The expansion coefficient glass of the fiber is very low;

almost zero. The biggest impact results from the
temperature dependent change of the refraction index .
When a fiber is fixed to a specimen, the FBGS signal
/0 changes with the strain (m + T) of the specimen
and therefore the thermal expansion coefficient is sp then
and not glass.

The first expression (k ) of equation (9) describes the

strain impact caused by force (m) and temperature (T).
The second part ( T) describes the change of the
glass refraction index n caused only by temperature.

T =

(17)

(10)

p = photo-elastic coefficient, p = 0.22

k = gage factor, k = 0.78
= strain
T = temperature change in K
= change of the refraction index,
= 5.8 10-6/K

= (k * glass + ) * T

glass = 0.55 10-6 / K

k = 1-p

Equation for a temperature-measuring FBGS

0 = base wavelength at test start

or

= (1 p ) * ( m + sp * T ) +

n / n
* T
T

(14)

When the FBGS is fixed to the specimen on a region

without mechanical strain (m=0) it works as a temperature
compensation FBGS. Its signal calculates according to
equations (21) and (22).

= (k * sp + ) * T

T =

1
k * sp +

(21)

(22)

Equation for a temperature compensation FBGS

6. Temperature Compensation

= k * ( m + sp * T ) + * T
sp of steel
=
sp of aluminum =
of refraction =

(15)
-6

11.....13 10 /K
22.... 23 10-6/K
58 10-6/K

In case of a pure temperature sensor a Bragg grating is not

stressed (the fiber then is fixed only at one point, sufficiently
apart from the Bragg grating). The FBGS /0 signal then
changes only with temperature according to equation (16).
In this case is the thermal expansion coefficient glass of
the fiber.

= (1 p ) * glass * T +

n / n
* T
T

(16)

Because temperature has a very strong impact on the

FBGS signals, precise strain measuring results can only
be achieved with proper temperature compensation.
Normally an additional temperature-measuring FBGS is
used and the signal of the strain-measuring FBGS is
corrected by calculation. There are two different methods
possible. At first it is possible to measure the temperature
with a pure temperature-measuring FBGS and secondly to
measure the temperature impact using a temperature
compensation FBGS. The more simple solution to
compensate temperature impact is to use a compensation
FBGS. A FBGS (mechanically identical to the active
strain-measuring FBGS and may be also on the same
fiber) has to be placed on a location of the specimen with
zero mechanical strain (m = 0). Correct results can be
achieved for the mechanical strain m according to
equation (24) by subtracting the signal of the
compensation FBGS from the signal of the active strainmeasuring FBGS. Equation (23) = (19) (21).

0 m

m =

0 c

= k *m

1 m c

*(
)
k 0 m 0c

(23)

(24)

FBG is split into two equal beams and then fed through
two different edge filters with opposite characteristics. The
transparency of Filter a increases with wavelength while
the transparency of Filter b decreases. A differential
photo-diode behind the filters a and b generates an
electrical signal proportional to the difference of light
behind the two filters.

m = wavelength shift of strain-measuring FBGS

0m = base wavelength of strain-measuring FBGS
c = wavelength shift of compensation FBGS
0c = base wavelength of compensation FBGS
Measurements at very high temperatures (several hundred C) must take into account that
the base wavelengths of both FBGS change considerably with temperature and therefore
0 (the original wavelength at room temperature) has to be replaced in all equations above
by
0T = 0 + T

(25)

T is the change of wavelength of FBGScomp caused by temperature change.

But it is not always possible to find a position without strain

on the specimen to fix a compensation FBG. In these cases
the method first mentioned pure temperature
measurement - has to be applied. When the temperature is
captured by a temperature-measuring FBGS according to
equations (16) to (18) the calculation of strain becomes a
little more complex. Replacing T in equation (20) by the
term for T in equation (18) leads to equation (26).

m =

k * sp +
1 m T
*(
*(
))

k 0 m 0T k * glass +

(26)

T = wavelength shift of temperature-measuring FBGS

0T = base wavelength of temperature-measuring FBGS
Because kglass is almost zero this term may be neglected
or can be included in by increasing by 0.410-6 .
Equation (26) simplifies then to equation (27).

m =

k * sp
1 m T
*(

*(
+ 1))

k 0 m 0T

(27)

Fig. 10: Edge filter interrogator

A shift of the FBG wavelength therefore changes the
amplitude of the output signal of the differential diodes.
This principle is able to provide high bandwidth at low
price. But only one FBGS signal can be measured with an
edge filter channel at a time. This principle enables only
the value of the peak wavelength to be output but cannot
provide information about a spectrum. Because it is an
analog (level-depending) principle its accuracy and
stability is low and higher levels of scattered light can
corrupt the results completely.
For FBGS with wavelengths in the range of 800 nm, CCD
based interrogators are well suited. A holographic grating
reflects different wavelengths to different pixels of the
CCD-line. With interpolation algorithms the resolution of
the CCD can be increased by two orders of ten providing a

If equation (26) or (27) is used, it is necessary to know the

expansion coefficient sp of the specimen and the index of
refraction very precisely. (The index of refraction
depends especially strong on the amount of Germanium
doting of the fiber.)

7. FBGS Interrogators
When FBGS are being strained the wavelength of the
reflection peaks will be shifted. For measuring strain with
FBGS it is necessary to measure these shifts very precisely.
Resolution and short-term stability of +1 pm is required, if
strain values of 1 m/m are to be measured.
1 pm resolution of peak wavelength of 1550 nm means a
6
relationship of >10 . There exist many different principles to
analyze such optical spectrums. For laboratory tasks,
interferometers are often used. But they are not so well
suited to robust industrial applications. In industrial
environments other principles dominate. Three of them will
be briefly explained below:
The edge filter principle uses special optical filters with
wavelength-dependent transparencies. In a differential
configuration (as shown in Fig. 10) the reflected light of a

Fig. 11: CCD based interrogator for 800 nm band

total resolution of 1 pm. The CCD principle can be made
pretty fast (>1000 M/s) and provides good accuracy and a
good signal-to-noise ratio. It captures the whole spectrum
and therefore can measure many FBGS signals with
different wavelengths simultaneously. Normally this
principle is used in the 800-nm band because affordable
CCDs are based on silicon technology and therefore work
only in the near infrared light-band.

it provides many advantages in special applications as

pointed out in chapter 2. The fiber and the Bragg grating
technology can be controlled pretty well today and
represent no problem any more. The main problem comes
from the requirement to induce the strain precisely into the
fiber.

Fig. 13: SI-405 optical interrogator together with MGCplus

Fig. 12: High resolution interrogator with tunable laser

For the C-band (~1550 nm), interrogators with tunable
lasers represent the top-class instruments [4]. Other
interrogator principles use broad-band light sources and
therefore only a very small part of the light energy is related
to the small bandwidth of a FBG. Therefore the reflected
peak energy is very low. A tunable laser concentrates all its
energy in an extremely small bandwidth and by sweeping
over the whole bandwidth range (see Fig. 12) it scans the
spectrum with high power and can provide an excellent
signal-to-noise ratio.
Because of this high signal-to-noise ratio, FBGS with
reflectivities down to <1% can still be measured with high
precision. Because of the high energy budget the tuned
laser output signal can be split into many output channels
without losses in signal quality. Fig. 12 shows 4 channels
with connected fibers. Each channel can measure many
Bragg sensors positioned on its fiber (e.g. FBG1.1
.FBG1.n on the first channel). Because one receiver per
channel exists it is also possible to capture a full spectrum
per channel. This is a big advantage because the available
bandwidth then is four times 80 nm = 320 nm. So FBGS
with equal wavelengths can be measured if they are on
different channels and the total number of connectable
FBGS is four times higher in comparison to interrogator
principles which work with only one receiving and signal
conditioning unit.

Embedding and gluing procedures of the fibers,

temperature
correction,
prevention
of
humidity
dependency and all these issues very well known from foil
strain gage technology are also topics of FBGS.
The analogy with equal strain gage subjects is obvious
and the applied methods often have to be the same. In
R&D analysis and also for validation tests of FBGS, strain
gages often are used in addition to FBGS to assure the
results. For such test environments, systems which are
able to connect and measure FBGS and strain gages
simultaneously and enable post processing for both
provide big advantages.
Fig. 13 shows such a system containing an optical
interrogator SI-405 to measure the FBGS signals and an
MGCplus to measure strain gages (and if necessary a lot
of other sensors like PT100, thermocouples, voltage and
current sources etc.). The PC that is required in addition is
not shown in Fig. 13.

8. Measuring System for Fiber Bragg

Grating Sensors and Strain Gages
In experimental stress analysis tests, strain-measuring
systems are the fundamental tool used very frequently. In
addition to the matured foil strain gage technology invented 70 years ago - the new technology of Fiber Bragg
Grating Sensors (FBGS) - now 12 years old is the second
important principle for strain acquisition. Actually this is a
relatively young method and it is far from maturity, however

Fig. 14: Application of two strain gages and one

FBG sensor
7

For post processing purposes these data files can be

accessed by Open DAQ projects button on the start
panel (Fig. 15).

Fig. 17: Online graphic of a load test

Fig. 15: Start panel of catmanEasy

CatmanEasy is the software used for data acquisition,

online graphic and post processing. Fig. 15 shows the
start panel of catmanEasy.
If the New DAQ project button is pressed the connected
instruments are automatically scanned and all their
measuring channels activated and displayed in a channel
list. Fig. 16 is an example for such a channel list.
The access to various online graphs (example is shown
in Fig. 17) is also provided by this panel (not shown in
Fig. 16). Channels to be displayed in a chosen online
graph can easily be copied out of the channel list by drag
and drop and put into the diagrams.

The Test Explorer panel opens (Fig. 19) then and

stored data files can be selected and easily activated by
drag and drop too. Under Computations computed
channels can be generated (left side of Test Explorer). To
do this, formulas can be set up which include measured
channel data and all mathematic functions shown in Fig.
19. By the Paste button a large variety of higher
mathematical functions will be offered additionally.
Functions in other panels provide FFT spectrums, filter
algorithms and last but not least, all necessary functions
for stress analysis like rosette calculation (Fig. 18).

Fig. 18: Computing functions for rosette calculations

Fig. 16: Channel list with FBG sensors and strain gages

All measured data is automatically buffered and can be

stored after completion of the test under individual names
or can be stored periodically e.g. every 10 minutes to
avoid power down data losses.

In parallel to all the data acquisition, real time displays

and post processing calculations of physical quantities,
catmanEasy can also display and store the four
spectrums measured by the interrogator SI-401 (Fig. 20).
The buffered data can be saved manually by pressing the
Save now button or automatically every n minutes by
activating Save automatically every n minutes.

Fig. 19: Test Explorer (setup for post processing and some diagrams with post-processed data)

9. References
[1] Mitschke, F.: Glasfasern, Physik und Technologie;
ELSEVIER SPEKTRUM Akademischer Verlag,
ISBN 3-8274-1629-9
[2] Trutzel, M.: Dehnungsermittlung mit faseroptischen
Bragg-Gitter-Sensoren, Berlin 2001, D83; Dissertation
[3] Dyer S. D., Williams P. A., Espejo R. J, Kofler J.D.,
Etzel S. M.:Fundamental limits in fibre Bragg grating
Peak wavelength measurements;
National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Optoelectronics Division, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
17th International Conference on Optical Fibre Sensors
Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 5855
[4] Zhou Z., Graver T. W., Hsu L., Ou J.: Techniques of
Advanced FBG sensors: fabrication, demodulation,
encapsulation and the structural health monitoring of
bridges;
Pacific Science Review, vol. 5, 2003, pp. 116-121
[5] Schroeder., Ecke , Apitz , Lembke, Lenschow:
A fibre Bragg grating sensor system monitors
operational load in a wind turbine rotor blade;
2006 IOP Publishing Ltd., Meas. Sci. Technology 17
(2006) 1167-1172
Fig. 20: Wavelength spectrum