Schoolid609738 Hsciwp As of 112212

Lincoln Park High School
North-Northwest Side High School Network

2001 N Orchard St Chicago, IL 60614
2012-2014 Continuous
Improvement Work Plan
ISBE ID: 150162990250047

School ID: 609738
Oracle ID: 46321
Mission Statement
All of Lincoln Park High School's students will graduate college and career ready as a result of developing high level critical thinking skills and a strong ability to collaborate and
cooperate with people from a wide variety of backgrounds.
Strategic Priorities
1. Students will develop critical thinking skills by focusing on literacy, analysis, synthesis, and through the implementation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
2. Lincoln Park High School will implement a structured and individualized recovery plan for students who are not developing their critical thinking skills and academic
habits proficiently.
3. Lincoln Park High School will implement a Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) system using Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 interventions.
School Performance Goals
12th Grade & Graduation Goals
EPAS Goals
SY 2011
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
19.2
19.3
EXPLORE
19.4
SY2012
21.0
SY2013
21.1
PLAN
21.2
SY2011
SY2014
22
22.0
22.5
ACT
22.6
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
53.6
60.0
65.0
70.0
College Eligibility
Date Stamp November 22, 2012
SY2012
77.9
80.0
SY2013
82.0
SY2014
85.0
Graduation Rate
75.5
78.0
80.0
85.0
College Enrollment
Continuous Improvement Work Plan

2012 - 2014
Overview
The Continuous Improvement Work Plan (CIWP) is a stream-lined, strategic planning process for schools that also meets the state and federal requirements of a school improvement plan.
The CIWP uses previous goal and priority setting completed by the schools from the Scorecard metrics, School Effectiveness Framework and Theory of Action. Please see the CIWP
Planning Guide at www.cps.edu/CIWP for detailed instructions on completing the tool.
School Name
To get started, please select your school's name from the drop down list:
Developing a CIWP Team

A CIWP team consists of 6 12 committed stakeholders that act as the steering committee for the entire CIWP planning process. The principal should serve as the chairperson of the CIWP
Team, appointing other team members from the school and community, which can include members from the ILT and/or LSC. These CIWP Team members should have strengths in
collaboration and consensus-building. While the CIWP Team needs to remain small, it should include people with a variety of perspectives.
CIWP Team
Name (Print)
Title/Relationship
Mike Boraz
Ken Duncan
Amy Hamilton
Brian Murphy
Kevin Krakovsky
Richard Sauer
Carolyn Latshaw
Margaret Harrod
Noreen Rasul
Kathy Berghoff
Dawn Glunz
Version 03/12
Principal
Assistant Principal
Lead/ Resource Teacher
Classroom Teacher
LSC Member
Special Education Faculty
CIWP Team Page 1 of 1
High School Goal Setting

Instructions: Your school's data is organized by Scorecard categories. Using your current performance data and your SY2012 goals, determine the SY2013 & SY2014 performance goals for each
metric. Note: PSAE scores include all students in the aggregates, including English Language Learners.
Academic Achievement
EPAS - 9th, 10th,
and 11th Grades
Spring
SY2011
Score
Fall SY2012
Spring
Spring
Spring
Score
SY2012 Goal SY2013 Goal SY2014 Goal
9th Grade - EXPLORE

Average EXPLORE score
17.7
19.2
19.3
19.4
53.6
60.0
65.0
70.0
77.9
80.0
82.0
85.0
75.5
78.0
80.0
85.0
19.5
21.0
21.1
21.2
19.9
22.0
22.5
22.6
College Enrollment
% of graduates enrolled in college
SY2013
Goal
SY2014
Goal
EXPLORE to PLAN
Average growth from Spring EXPLORE to Spring PLAN
1.9
1.9
PLAN to ACT
Average growth from Spring PLAN to SPRING ACT
1.5
1.5
11th Grade - ACT

Average ACT score
21.6
EPAS Growth
College Eligibility
% of graduates eligible for a selective
four-year college (GPA & ACT)
5-Year Graduation Rate
% of students who have graduated
within 5 years
10th Grade - PLAN

Average PLAN score
SY2011
Score
12th Grade & Graduates
Climate & Culture

SY2011
SY2012
Goal
SY2013
Goal
SY2014 Goal
Attendance Rate
Average daily attendance rate
84.6
88.0
90.0
90.0
Misconducts
Rate of Misconducts (L4-6) per 100
9.2
8.0
6.0
4.0
Freshman On-Track
% of Freshman Students on-track
74.4
85.0
88.0
90.0
Sophomore On-Track
% of Sophomore students on track
83.2
85.0
87.0
90.0
All Grades
Version 03/12
SY2011
HS Goals Page 1 of 2
High School Goal Setting

Instructions: Your school's data is organized by Scorecard categories. Using your current performance data and your SY2012 goals, determine the SY2013 & SY2014 performance goals for each
metric. Note: PSAE scores include all students in the aggregates, including English Language Learners.
State Assessment
PSAE
PSAE Reading
% of students meeting or exceeding
state standards
PSAE Mathematics
state standards
PSAE Science
state standards
Version 03/12
SY2011
Score
65.7
60.5
58.9
SY2011
Score
68.0
63.0
61.0
72.0
66.0
64.0
75.0
PSAE Reading
% of students exceeding state
standards
17.1
20.0
25.0
30.0
70.0
PSAE Mathematics
standards
7.7
10.0
15.0
20.0
69.0
PSAE Science
standards
11.1
15.0
20.0
25.0
HS Goals Page 2 of 2
School Effectiveness Framework

Instructions: Evaluate your school from 1-4 on each of the Effective Practices of the School Effectiveness Framework in the drop down box under "Evaluation". Cite evidence from
observations, any available data, surveys, etc. NOTE: 2= Typical School and 4 = Effective School TIP: When entering text, press Alt + Enter to start a new paragraph.
DIMENSION 1:Leadership
Typical School
Goals and theory of action
The school has established goals for student

achievement that are aimed at making incremental
growth and narrowing of achievement gaps.
The school has a plan but may have too many
competing priorities.
Principal Leadership
Professional learning is organized through whole
staff development but it is not tightly linked to what
happens in teacher team meetings or 1:1 coaching
cycles.
Principal monitors instructional practice for teacher
evaluations.
School-wide or class specific vision is not
consistently focused on college and career
readiness..
Principal provides basic information for families on
school events and responds to requests for
information. Families and community are engaged
through occasional school-wide events such as open
houses or curriculum nights.
Effective School
Evidence
Evaluation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
3
The school has established clear, measurable goals for

student achievement aimed at aggressively narrowing the
achievement gap and ensuring college and career readiness
of all students-- at the school, grade, and classroom levels.
The school has established a clear theory of action or
strategic plan that outlines the schools priorities (derived
from analysis of data) and key levers along with the
anticipated impact when implemented with fidelity.
HS Goals are based on multiple factors from school performance

policy data, grade and attendance data, "My Voice, My School"
Survey results, and evidence gathered through school staff and
Instructional Leadership Team (ILT) walks. Data sets include:
Trends in ACT and PSAE results over period from 2001-2011:

*The ACT composite score ranges between 20.4 and 22.2; in 2011
the ACT composite score is 21.6
*The percentage of students who meet or exceed in PSAE
composite scores ranges between 58.5 and 65.1; in 2011 the
percentage for Meets/Exceeds is 61.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Principal creates a professional learning system that
evaluates teacher need and interest and builds
opportunities for growth in content knowledge and
leadership
Principal clarifies a vision for instructional best practice,
works with each staff member to determine goals and
benchmarks, monitors quality and drives continuous
improvement.
Principal establishes and nurtures a culture of college and
career readiness through clarity of vision, internal and
external communications and establishment of systems to
support students in understanding and reaching these
goals.
Principal creates a system for empowered families and
communities through accurate information on school
performance, clarity on student learning goals, and
opportunities for involvement.
Daily observations (informal classroom visits) with feedback to

individual teachers by administrative team members. Focus areas
include instructinoal strategies, student engagement, assessment of
student learning, purpose, goals and learning objectives, general
classroom environment.
Weekly engagement with Curriculum Teams and Instructional
Leadership Team (ILT) to support staff in professional learning
cycle: curriculum goal-setting and lesson planning (with a focus on
critical thinking and integration of Common Core State Standards),
support for implementing lessons and instructional strategies,
analysis of student work and assessment data.
Quarterly professional learning as member of Common Core State
Standards (CCSS) Early Adopter Group. Principal, English and Math
teachers meet quarterly with staff from across the distric to
develop curriculuar tools for the district-wide implementation of
Version 03/12
SEF Page 1 of 13

Typical School
Teacher Leadership
A core group of teachers performs nearly all
leadership duties in the school.
A few voices tend to contribute to the majority of
decision-making at the ILT and teacher team levels.
Teacher learning and expertise is inconsistently
shared after engagement in professional learning
activities.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Each teacher is invested in the success of the school

through leadership in one or more areas, including (but not
limited to):
-ILT membership
-Grade/Course team lead
- RtI team
-Committee chair or membership
-Mentor teacher
-Curriculum team
-Coach
-Family liaison
-Data team
-Bilingual lead
-SIPAAA/CWIP team
-Union representative
-Grant writer
Each teacher has equity of voice in grade/course, ILT and
whole staff meetings
Each teacher is encouraged to share learning about
effective practice from PD or visits to other schools
Evaluation
3
Teachers and staff members participate in leadership roles in one

or more of the following areas:
*ILT membership
*Curriculum team leadership
*Coaching/Sponsorship of extracurricular activities
*Mentoring of new teachers
*SIPAAA/CIWP team
*Union representation
*Individual grant writing (i.e. Donor's Choose)
Teachers meet with members of curriculum teams on a weekly
basis; given the diversity of our program, most teachers are
members of 2-3 curriculum teams and are able to take on
leadership resposibilities within the curriculum team.
The ILT is open to all teachers and all are welcomed to attend; ILT
meeting dates and times are included on the weekly agenda given
to all staff members to encourage participation. Regular attendees
include teachers from the English, Math, World Language,
Performing Arts, and Special Education departments.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 2 of 13

Typical School
Effective School
Evidence
Instructional Leadership Team (ILT)

The ILT represents some or most grade levels or
departments, but may not include critical areas of
expertise, like special education, bilingual education
or counseling.
The ILT splits time and focus between improving
teaching and learning and solving day-to-day
operational concerns.
The ILT organizes some whole staff professional
development activities. Development at the teacher
team or teacher level is not coordinated by the ILT.
ILT decision-making is carried out in isolation, or
without a clear process for staff-wide engagement.
ILT engages in changes to practice in response to
voiced concerns.
ILT analyzes student test data if new data is
available.
Monitoring and adjusting

Data for district assessments is occasionally
analyzed at the school level, typically when new
reports are made available. Analysis may lead to
instructional practice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The schools ILT is assembled based on the combination
of knowledge and expertise needed to make decisions for
all students and staff.
The ILT leads the work of improving teaching and
learning school-wide
The ILT leads the schools approach to professional
development whole staff PD, teacher teams, and
coaching.
The ILT facilitates two-way communication and engages
all staff in participating in decision-making that advances
the schools strategic focus.
The ILT engages in regular reflection upon its own team
processes and effectiveness and takes actions to improve
its functioning and progress towards school-wide goals.
The ILT regularly analyzes qualitative and quantitative
data to monitor the implementation of schools plan and
make adjustments accordingly
ILT membership - members from all departments within the school;

regular attendees include teachers from the English, Math, World
Language, Performing Arts, and Special Education departments.
ILT activities include the following:
*Meetings every 1-2 weekswith a focus on improving teaching and
learning school-wide and leading the staff in the professional
learning cycle
*Whole school learning activities during professional development
days including: readings, discussion, modeling/use of protocols
*Conducting whole school and ILT team learning walks to collect
and analyze classroom-level data around our school focus, critical
thinking
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school has a systematic approach to analyzing data
relative to the schools theory of action on an ongoing
basisat the school level, department/grade level, and
classroom levelin order to make adjustments to their
focus and to target support for particular teachers and
students.
Evaluation
Data analysis by all staff members in opening days of school year.

Discussion of multiple data sets including EXPLORE, PLAN, and ACT
data; grade point average and attendance data; teacher and
student survey data from "My Voice, My School" survey.
Data analysis by grade levels:
9th grade-NWEA/MAP testing used to monitor progress/skill
development in reading and math in the Fall, Winter, and Spring
11th grade-Practice ACT testing in Fall and Winter
Version 03/12
SEF Page 3 of 13

Typical School
DIMENSION 2: Core Instruction
Curriculum
Curricular pacing/scope and sequence is most often
determined by the pacing set forth in instructional
materials or by an individual teacher.
Each teacher develops his/her own units of
instruction or follows what is suggested by the
pacing provided in instructional materials.
Text used for instruction exposes some students to
grade-appropriate complexity and is heavily focused
on fiction.
Short- and long-term plans do not consistently
differentiate by learner need.
Instructional materials
Core instructional materials vary between teachers
of the same grade/course or are focused mainly on a
single textbook with little exposure to standardsaligned supplemental materials.
Instructional materials support a general
curriculum with little differentiation for student
learning need.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Each grade level or course team has a year-long scope

and sequence that maps out what Common Core or other
state standards teachers should teach and in what order in
core subject areas.
Each grade level or course team develops/uses common
units of instruction aligned to the standards.
Text used for instruction exposes all students to a gradeappropriate level of complexity and informational texts to
at least the CCSS-recommended levels by grade band.
Short and long term plans include the supports necessary
to ensure that students with disabilities and ELLs are able
to gain core content knowledge and skills.
Curriculum maps and common units of instruction are developed by

curriculum teams in alignment with content area national
standards, EPAS college readiness standards, and/or Common Core
State Standards so that students meet the goals and learn the skills
of the unit.
Curriculum teams submit unit plans on a quarterly basis that
include unit goals, outcomes, and standards; instructional activities,
strategies, resources and materials used; unit assessment results
and data analysis; accomodations and modifications made for
special needs students; and alternate apporaches to re-teach goals
and skills not met by students.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Each grade level or course team has a set of instructional
materials that are aligned with standards.
Instructional materials are supportive of students with
disabilities as well as varying language proficiency levels of
ELLs (including native language and bilingual supports).
Evaluation
Curriculum teams use common instructional materials that are

alinged with standards including textbooks, supplemental texts,
films, and technology programs.
Instructional materials are aligned to support students across
instructional levels and programs (regular, honors, double honors,
and IB) as well as students with disabilities and varying language
proficiency.
Reading Materials Survey: In addition to evaluating your school in this area, we encourage schools to begin inventorying grade level literacy materials by completing the survey at
www.surveymonkey.com/s/materialsurvey. While this is not a comprehensive inventory of your school's instructional materials, this will help you identify the additional literacy
materials needed to help implement the Common Core State Standards in the upcoming school year.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 4 of 13

Typical School
Assessment
School wide data is available to the ILT. Teacher
team or classroom data is not always available when
teachers need itor teachers inconsistently bring it
to teacher team meetings.
Each grade level or course team administers the
required district assessments but there may be gaps
in the kind of assessment tools available to them.
Assessments are focused on a particular form of
assessment and may not adequately provide a
complete picture of student learning.
Most assessments are designed to be identical for
all students, without accommodation for learner
need.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
School-wide, teacher team and classroom data is

organized and available to all who need it immediately
after each assessment.
Each grade level or course team uses a comprehensive
set of assessments screening, diagnostic, benchmark,
formative, and summative to monitor student learning on
a frequent basis.
Assessment methods (e.g., student work, selected
response, constructed response, performance task) are
aligned with the standard(s) being assessed (e.g.,
knowledge mastery, reasoning proficiency, performance
skills, ability to create products).
Assessment accommodations and modifications are in
place to ensure that students with disabilities and ELLs are
able to appropriately demonstrate their knowledge and
skills.
Evaluation
2
School-wide assessment data is provided to staff when it becomes

availble; historical school-wide assessment data is accessible
through IMPACT via CIM.
Curriculum teams are asked to submit common assessment data on
a quarterly basis via the Unit Plan Framework.
Curriculum teams use a comprehensive set of assessments
including diagnostic, formative, and summative to monitor student
learning on a frequent basis.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 5 of 13

Typical School
Instruction
Communication of the learning objective is
inconsistent or lesson objectives do not consistently
align to standards.
Questioning is more heavily aimed at assessing
basic student understanding and comprehension.
Sequencing of lessons in most classes is primarily
driven by the pacing suggested in instructional
materials.
Instruction is most often delivered whole-group
with few opportunities for scaffolding learning or the
level of rigor is not consistently high.
Formative assessment during instruction is used
occasionally or inconsistently between teachers.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Each teacher clearly communicates with students the

standards-based learning objective, directions and
procedures, as well as the relevance of the learning.
, Each teacher uses low- and high-level questioning
techniques that promote student thinking and
understanding.
Each teacher purposefully sequences and aligns
standards-based objectives to build towards deep
understanding and mastery of the standards.
Each teacher scaffolds instruction to ensure all students,
including students with disabilities and English language
learners access complex texts and engage in complex tasks.
Each teacher regularly uses formative assessment during
instruction to monitor student progress and check for
understanding of student learning.
Evaluation
2
Learning objectives are well articulated in curriculum team maps

and unit plans and are alinged with standards (National, College
Readiness, and/or Common Core).
A variety of questioning techniques are used by some teachers to
promote student thinking and understanding. Sharing of
strategies to build students' critical thinking skills is our school's
instructional focus.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 6 of 13

Typical School
Intervention
Decision-making about how to determine which
students are in need of intervention, what
interventions they receive and how to determine the
success of interventions is not regularly monitored.
The intervention options are limited (sometimes onesize-fits-all), making it difficult to find a targeted
solution to address a particular students needs.
Intervention monitoring and adjustments are left to
teacher discretion without school-wide systems.
Professional Learning
Whole staff professional development

Whole staff professional development occurs
regularly but is not tightly aligned to the schools
priorities.
Quality, effectiveness or relevance of professional
development is not monitored.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school has a systematic approach to administering

screening assessments to identify students in need of
academic intervention.
The school has a systematic approach to administering
diagnostic assessments to identify particular skills gaps.
Interventions at the elementary level include in-class,
small group instruction, push-in support provided by
specialists, one on one support and additional supports
outside of the classroom.
Interventions at the secondary school level include small
group instruction, double blocks in literacy and
mathematics, push-in support provided by specialists, one
on one support and additional supports outside of the
classroom
Interventions are closely monitored at the ILT, teacher
team and individual teacher level so that adjustments can
be made at least every 6 weeks.
A team approach is used for identifying and supporting students

with diverse learning needs and ensuring appropriate modifications
and accommodations are made through Individualized educational
plans (IEPs) and 504 plans.
A systemic approach is used to screen students and one on one
support interventions are provided. This approach is particularly
strong at the freshmen level.
A variety of before and after school academic support is provided
by teachers to individual students and small groups. Additionally,
afterschool tutoring across all subject areas is provided four days a
week and is open to all students.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school has a year-long, focused plan for whole staff
professional development aligned to school-wide priorities
and growth goals.
The school has a method for continually monitoring the
effectiveness of all professional development (including
coaching and teacher collaboration).
School-wide structures ensure that professional
development is ongoing, job-embedded and relevant to
teachers.
Evaluation
A system for providing job embedded and highly collaborative

professional development aligned to school goals is being piloted
by the ILT and several course teams. Summer planning will center
on deepening this process. The process is not yet school wide, and
there are some parts missing, such as agreed upon strategies for
deepening critical thinking and argumentation skills.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 7 of 13
DIMENSION 3: P
Typical School
Grade-level and/or course teams
Teachers meet regularly but it is focused on a mix
of activitiesplanning, professional development,
and data analysisthat may change from week to
week.
Teachers do not have a regular opportunity to
discuss progress monitoring data to track
effectiveness of student intervention.
Ownership for student learning results lies
primarily with individual teachers.
Planning typically takes place with general
education teachers only. Special education, bilingual
or other specialists typically plan and meet
separately or only join the group occasionally.
There are meeting agendas, but no clear protocols
or norms for discussion.
Instructional coaching
Coaching typically takes place through informal
associations or is only focused on a smaller group of
teachers.
Formal support for new teachers comes from
district-sponsored induction.
Professional development decisions are not
systematized and left to teacher initiative/discretion.
Teachers occasionally receive quality feedback to
support individual growth.
Peer observation and cross-classroom visitation
happens occasionally, but not as an integral part of
the schools plan for professional learning.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Teachers collaborate in regular cycles: quarterly for longterm unit planning, weekly to analyze formative
assessment data and plan weekly instruction.
Teachers and specialists meet approximately every six
weeks to discuss progress-monitoring data for students
receiving intervention.
Teacher teams share ownership for results in student
learning.
Teams are inclusive of general education, special
education, bilingual teachers and other specialists.
Teams are supported by an ILT member, team leader, or
expert, as appropriate.
Teachers have protocols or processes in place for team
collaboration.
Some teams work well together, and the ILT is leading the
implementation of collaboration cycles. Focus on team ownership
of data and use of protocols in meetings can improve.
Collaboration approach needs to be consistent school wide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Every school has a coaching plan that identifies teacher
needs, who provides the coaching, and how frequently.
New teachers are provided with effective induction
support.
Teachers have individual professional development plans
tailored to their needs.
Teachers consistently receive quality feedback that
supports their individual growth.
Peer coaching and cross classroom visitation is also used
as a form of coaching.
Evaluation
Again, a process is being implemented to make peer observation

and focused coaching a regular and integral part of professional
learning. 20 plus teachers are currently participating in the pilot.
They will be able to lead the expansion of the work in the fall.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 8 of 13

Typical School
DIMENSION 4:Climate and Culture
High expectations & College-going culture

Some staff members reinforce expectations for all
students to aspire to college and career ready
standards, or expectations are only reinforced for
some students.
Relationships
Some students form bonds with adult advocates.
Patterns of interaction between adults and
students and among students are inconsistent..
Students with disabilities are typically confined to a
special education classroom with few opportunities
to interact with peers.
Student home language and culture is often
overlooked.
Behavior& Safety
Discipline violations and positive behavior supports
are handled differently between teachers without
school wide norms.
School environment occasionally leads to situations
un-conducive to learning.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Every staff member reinforces school expectations for all

students to aspire to college and career-ready standards.
The school has developed and is executing an intentional
plan to build and maintain a college-going culture.
Every student has opportunities for authentic leadership
and student voice
Evaluation
3
College going culture is strong and new events have been added to
improve the culture, such as a large spring college fair for juniors,
but a comprehensive approach to making sure all graduates have
access to a college that is a good fit is not there yet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Interactions are generally good, but not all students have an

All students have an adult advocate who cares about
advocate and responses to disrespectful behavior are seen as
them deeply and supports them in achieving their goals
inconsistent by the staff.
Patterns of interactions, both between adults and
students and among students, are respectful, with
appropriate, fair responses to disrespectful behavior
Students with disabilities are engaged in the school
community, including both physical and social integration.
Students classroom experiences demonstrate value of
home language and culture.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school has a common, consistent school-wide

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) is a strategic
approach to student discipline and tiered approach to
priority for next year. Several staff members have been to training,
behavioral intervention that recognizes and builds on
and more intensive training will take place during this summer.
positive behavior.
Staff establishes and maintains a safe, welcoming school
environment.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 9 of 13

Typical School
DIMENSION 5: Family and Community Engagement
Expectations
Principal provides information to families on school
performance in response to parent requests.
Teachers provide information to families on their
grading system, but families may be unclear on what
successfully meeting the standard would look like.
Families can learn about the transition process if
they reach out to the school for information.
Ongoing communication
Communication to families is typically conducted
only during report card pick-up and in cases of
behavior/academic concerns.
Bonding
The school has a business-like atmosphere.
School staff provides occasional opportunities for
families and community members to participate in
authentic and engaging activities in the school
community-- like student performances, exhibitions,
literacy or math events, etc.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Principal provides clear information for families on school

performance and accurately explains this information so
that families understand its relevance to their children as
well as the plan for improvement.
Teachers provide clear information for families on what
students are expected to achieve in a given grade level or
course and examples of what meeting the standards looks
like.
Schools proactively provide information regarding school
choices to families looking to relocate or to students in
transition grades.
Staff members communicate with families in a variety of ways and

primarily in regard to behavior and/or academic concerns. In
addition to report card pick-up, communication occurs through
regular conferences, phone calls and emails.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school establishes and non-threatening, welcoming
environment.
The principal leads the work to empower and motivate
families and community to become engaged.
School staff provides frequent opportunities for families
and community members to participate in authentic and
engaging activities in the school community-- like student
performances, exhibitions, literacy or math events, etc.
There are times during the year when clear information is provided,
but a majority of families do not participate in the events. Syllabi
are provided and grades are regularly updated, but comprehensive
communication for all families can be improved.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Teachers and other school staff engage in ongoing, twoway communication with families so that they know how
their child is doing relative to grade-level expectations and
how the families can support their childs learning at home,
but also so that school staff can learn from the families
about their childs strengths and needs.
Evaluation
We have occasional events where families feel engaged and we

have an active Friends group, but more outreach to the community
and more events other than the typical performances and sports
events could take place.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 10 of 13

Typical School
Specialized support
School provides required services to students
within the school building/typical school hours.
N 6: College and Career Readiness Supports
College & Career Exploration and election

Information about college or career choices is
provided.
Academic Planning
Support for college and career planning is provided
for some students. Information and opportunities to
explore paths of interest are limited.
The school encourages high performing students to
plan on taking advanced courses.
Enrichment & Extracurricular Engagement
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
School staff conducts intensive outreach to families in

need of specialized support through home visits and
collaboration with social services agencies.
Advanced Placement (AP) numbers are increasing and opportunities

are being added. More students could have access. Less than
100% of students are taking AP and applying to college. Until 100%
have applied and experienced some AP, we are falling short.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Extracurricular activities exist but may be limited in The school ensures equitable exposure to a wide range of
scope or students may not be purposefully involved extracurricular and enrichment opportunities that build
in activities that align with their strengths and needs. leadership, nurture talents and interests, and increase
engagement with school.
Regular college visits and events take place throughout the year. A
more comprehensive approach to planning and communication
could take place.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school provides support for student planning,
preparation, participation, and performance in their college
and career aspirations and goals through a rigorous
academic program and access to information and
opportunities.
(HS only) The school regularly evaluates rigorous coursetaking and performance patterns (e.g., AP) and removes
barriers to access.
This is another area that is being addressed in the new Continuous

Improvement Work Plan (CIWP) and budget. Outreach to students
who are struggling academically will be increased with more
instruction on organization and study skills and an afterschool
program that connects students with a peer mentor and college
tutors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school provides early and ongoing exposure to
experiences and information necessary to make informed
decisions when selecting a college or career that connects
to academic preparation and future aspirations.
Evaluation
Many students take part in a wide variety of extracurricular

opportunities, with new ones being offered every year. About 50%
of students participate. Therefore, more opportunities can be
offered to involve students not currently taking part.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 11 of 13

DIMENSION
Typical School
College & Career Assessments
Students do not participate in college and career
ready assessments
College & Career Admissions and Affordability

Students in 11th and 12th grade are provided
information on college options , costs and financial
aid.
Transitions
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school promotes preparation, participation, and

performance in college and career assessments.
Many students participate in Preliminary Scholastic Assessment

Test (PSAT), but not all.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
The school provides students and families with
comprehensive information about college options and
costs (HS only) The school ensures that students and
families have an early and ongoing understanding of the
college and career application and admission processes,
including information on financial aid and scholarship
eligibility.
Evaluation
Information is provided, but it could be provided earlier and more

often. Plans for reaching students who are not applying to college
can be developed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Transitions between key grades provide families

The school works to ensure effective transitionsinto
Several college visits, fairs, and information nights are provided to
with the required minimum paperwork/information. Kindergarten, at each benchmark grade, and from 8th to help students learn about the transition to college. More
9th.
information and outreach to families can be provided.
(HS only) The school connects students to school and
community resources to help them overcome barriers and
ensure the successful transition from high school to
college.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 12 of 13

Typical School
DIMENSION 7: Resource Alignment
Use of Discretionary Resources

School discretionary funding is inconsistently
aligned to identified needs and priorities.
Outside funding or community partnerships are
primarily limited to opportunities that present
themselves to the school.
Funding of non-priority initiatives is common
throughout the year.
Building a Team
Hiring is conducted after a vacancy or expected
vacancy is identified.
All or nearly all applicants have little to no prior
connection to the school.
Interviews typically consist of an interview with the
principal or a team from the school, but there are no
opportunities to demonstrate knowledge or skill in
the classroom.
Grade/course teams are not intentionally designed.
Use of Time
School schedule is designed based on number of
minutes per subject or course.
Teacher collaboration time is limited or occurs only
before/after school.
Intervention for struggling students happens at the
discretion/initiative of individual teachers, during
core courses.
Effective School
Evidence
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
School allocates discretionary spending to align with

identified needs and strategic priorities.
School actively identifies and pursues opportunities to for
outside funding or community partnerships to help meet
student and staff needs.
School maintains focus on use of resources for the
student achievement growth necessary for every student
to graduate college and career ready.
Evaluation
2
More and larger outside resources can be identified, but many

community organizations provide support for integral programs and
discretionary funds are spent on teacher training as well as key
operational needs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Hiring is conducted after an assessment of student need, Multi step process including classroom demonstration and
staff capacity and scheduling priorities.
participation of some members of the team for which the candidate
School actively works to build a pool of potential staff
is being hired.
members through internships and part-time work.
A multistep interview process includes a protocol for
questioning and classroom lesson demonstrations to assess
candidate expertise, philosophy and commitment.
Grade/course teams are assembled to include the
needed combination of knowledge and expertise.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
School designs a right fit schedule based on student
needs and school-wide growth goals.
The school schedule allows for regular, meaningful
collaboration in teacher teams.
Struggling students receive structured intervention in
dedicated blocks.
Collaboration time is provided and being increased. Extra periods

provided for arts and academic advancement.
Version 03/12
SEF Page 13 of 13
Mission & Strategic Priorities

Instructions: Write in your Mission Statement. Using your key levers from the Theory of Action, develop 3 - 5 strategic priorities you will focus on over the next two years. Provide a
Rationale using these guiding questions: What data (student achievement, school effectiveness framework, etc.) did you use to determine the priority? How does this priority impact
instruction? How does this priority help you to achieve your goals? Tip: When entering text, press Alt+Enter to start a new paragraph.
Mission Statement
All of Lincoln Park High School's students will graduate college and career ready as a result of developing high level critical thinking skills and a strong ability to collaborate and cooperate with people from a wide
variety of backgrounds.
Strategic Priorities
#
Priority Description: Write in the description of your priority.
Rationale: Write in your rationale (see instructions for guiding questions).
Students will develop critical thinking skills by focusing on literacy, analysis, synthesis, By focusing on critical thinking through literacy, analysis, and synthesis, the percent of
and through the implementation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
students making ACT Educational Planning and Assessment System (EPAS) expected
gains will increase each year by 10%. Students will also improve their overall college
readiness skills, including critical thinking and academic discourse skills. Data supporting
rationale comes from My Voice My School and data collection and analysis from whole
school Instructional Round in October, 2011
Lincoln Park High School will implement a structured and individualized recovery plan Students must develop and use the skills and habits they need to be successful in high
school and in preparation for college and career. When students fall behind in high
for students who are not developing their critical thinking skills and academic habits
school, it can be very difficult for them to catch up. Therefore, a way to quickly identify
proficiently.
and provide support to students who are falling behind is needed to insure success for all
students. Data from My Voice My School shows 30% of students feel they need more
support when they are not initially successful. Number of students with a D or F in at
least one class indicates need for more support structures.
Lincoln Park High School will implement a Positive Behavioral Interventions and
Supports (PBIS) system using Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 interventions.
4
5
Version 03/12
Teacher and student surveys ( My Voice, My School) indicate a need to increase

respectful, supportive, and challenging academic environment. Implementing a research
based model (with training and support for teachers) will improve school climate in the
areas of need and reduce barriers to strong academic performance such as absenteeism
and misconducts leading to In-School Suspension (ISS) or Out-of-School Suspension (OSS)
Optional
Optional
Mission & Priorities Page 1 of 1
Strategic Priority 1
Instructions: Develop milestones for each strategic priority that you will implement. Milestones are significant steps that a school must accomplish in the implementation of the strategic priority.
Milestones are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound). Indicate the category and group of students to which the milestone applies, the responsible party and the
timeline. You will update the status and next steps throughout the year as part of your continuous improvement cycle.
Rationale
Strategic Priority Description

Students will develop critical thinking skills by focusing on literacy, analysis, synthesis, and through the
implementation of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS).
By focusing on critical thinking through literacy, analysis, and synthesis, the percent of students making ACT
Educational Planning and Assessment System (EPAS) expected gains will increase each year by 10%. Students
will also improve their overall college readiness skills, including critical thinking and academic discourse skills.
Data supporting rationale comes from My Voice My School and data collection and analysis from whole school
Action Plan
Monitoring
Milestones
Align Curriculum Maps to Common Core State Standards

(CCSS)
All instruction aligned to CCSS with a focus on critical

thinking (CT) as defined by Lincoln Park (LP) Faculty.
In vertical and curriculum teams, identify CCSS that are
highest priority based on their overlap with LP critical
thinking definition
Develop assessments and performance tasks that will
allow us to evaluate student progress toward CCSS and CT
skills
Identify strategies that are most powerful for

implementing CCSS
Provide ongoing support for deepening knowledge of CCSS
Version 03/12
Category
ILT/ Teacher
Teams
Instruction
ILT/ Teacher
Teams
ILT/ Teacher
Teams
ILT/ Teacher
Teams
ILT/ Teacher
Teams
Target
Group
All
Responsible
Party
Beth Brown
Start
Summer 2012
Completed
Status
Comments & Next Steps
Quarter 2
Begin this summer with LP summer institute.

Continue in the Fall on extra before school institute
day, and ongoing into the fall until completed
Begin developing CCSS and CT aligned unit plans
and lessons during summer institute. Continue with
ongoing focus of curriculum team collaboration
through 2012-2013 school year (SY).
All
Beth Brown, Mike

Boraz, Ken Duncan
Summer 2012
Summer 2013
All
Curriculum Team
Leaders, Beth
Brown, Mike Boraz,
Ken Duncan
Quarter 1
Quarter 1
In curriculum teams and vertical teams that will

meet 1x per month.
All
Curriculum Teams
with support from
Admin Team
Summer 2012
On-going
Support for assessment, and task development

must be provided by Instructional Support Leaders
(ISL) and teacher leaders who have strong
experience with above tasks
On-going
Instructional Leadership Team (ILT) will lead

professional learning demonstrating powerful
instructional practices that allow students to meet
and exceed CCSS and critical thinking goals as
measured by internal and external rubrics.
On-going
ILT will lead professional learning demonstrating

powerful instructional practices that allow students
to meet and exceed CCSS and critical thinking goals
as measured by internal and external rubrics.
All
All
ILT
ILT
Summer 2012
Summer 2012
Priority 1 Page 1 of 2
Develop rubrics or use existing rubrics to provide detailed
description of quality work on CCSS and CT performance
tasks and assessments
Version 03/12
ILT/ Teacher
Teams
All
ILT
On-going
On-going
Will work to identify existing rubrics. Developing

valid rubrics can be very challenging
Rationale
Lincoln Park High School will implement a structured and individualized recovery plan for students who are not
developing their critical thinking skills and academic habits proficiently.
Students must develop and use the skills and habits they need to be successful in high school and in preparation
for college and career. When students fall behind in high school, it can be very difficult for them to catch up.
Therefore, a way to quickly identify and provide support to students who are falling behind is needed to insure
success for all students. Data from My Voice My School shows 30% of students feel they need more support
Action Plan
Monitoring
Milestones
6th class curriculum will focus on study skills,

organizational skills, and a group study framework to help
students stay on track in all classes
Counselors will divide grade levels and monitor grade
reports on a bi weekly basis, identifying all students who
have under a 65% in a core class
Off track students will be matched with high performing
upper classmen mentors. Mentors will meet with mentees
during extra period or after school to work on
organization, study habits, and work completion. Sessions
supervised by recovery coordinators and paid tutors
Train coordinators, paid tutors, and student mentors in
group study framework, organization, and social capital
development
Counselors and recovery coordinators will monitor
progress of students to determine who needs to be added
and who has successfully gotten back on track
Version 03/12
Category
Target
Group
Responsible
Party
Start
Completed
After School/
Extended Day
All
RTI Team
Summer 2012
Quarter 1
Instruction
Other student Counselors and RTI

group
Team
On-going
Quarter 1
On-going
After School/
Extended Day
Other student
group
Recovery
coordinators, paid
tutors, student
mentors
After School/
Extended Day
Other student
group
M. Boraz, recovery
coordinators,
training consultant
Summer 2012
On-going
After School/
Extended Day
Other student
group
M. Boraz, recovery
coordinators,
On-going
On-going
Status

Curriculum will be developed over the summer.
Training for teachers will take place during the
institute days this fall.
Version 03/12
Rationale
Lincoln Park High School will implement a Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) system using Tier 1, Teacher and student surveys ( My Voice, My School) indicate a need to increase respectful, supportive, and
Tier 2, and Tier 3 interventions.
challenging academic environment. Implementing a research based model (with training and support for
teachers) will improve school climate in the areas of need and reduce barriers to strong academic performance
such as absenteeism and misconducts leading to In-School Suspension (ISS) or Out-of-School Suspension (OSS)
Action Plan
Monitoring
Milestones
Train teacher team, dean, and Assistant Principal on Tier 1

approach
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) team
will study and present research on PBIS to faculty to
demonstrate PBIS ability to improve school climate and
student success
Faculty teams study data to determine focus for Lincoln
Park
Read case study of High School PBIS Implementation and
present to faculty
Category
Other
Target
Group
Responsible
Party
All
PBIS Team and

Coordinator
Start
Summer 2012
Completed
On-going
Data on success of PBIS will include increase in

attendance percentage of all students and
particularly Tier 2 and 3 students. Also reduction in
misconducts and referrals for all students.
All
PBIS Team and

Coordinator
Quarter 1
Quarter 1
Other
All
full faculty
Quarter 1
Quarter 1
Quarter 1
Quarter 1
Summer 2012
Quarter 1
Summer 2012
Quarter 1
PBIS Team and

Coordinator
PBIS Team and
All
Coordinator
PBIS Team and
Other student
Check in Check out
group
Coordinator
All
Train PBIS Team on Tier 2 interventions
Other
Design and implement Check in Check out including data

tracking
Other
Train team on implementing Tier 3 complex individualized

PBIS
Other
Other student
Washington, Boraz
group
Summer 2012
Quarter 1
Train counselors on wrap around services planning. This

includes indentifying community partners
Other
Other student Washington, Boraz,

group
Danielle Kelly
Summer 2012
Quarter 1
Version 03/12

once training is completed and initial PBIS plan is
implemented, monitoring will involve checking for
consistent implementation of plan across school
Other
Other
Status
Version 03/12
Rationale
Action Plan
Monitoring
Milestones
Version 03/12
Category
Target
Group
Responsible
Party
Start
Completed
Status
Rationale
Action Plan
Monitoring
Milestones
Version 03/12
Category
Target
Group
Responsible
Party
Start
Completed
Status

Schoolid609738 Hsciwp As of 112212

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Schoolid609738 Hsciwp As of 112212

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Schoolid609738 Hsciwp As of 112212

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lincoln Park High School

North-Northwest Side High School Network

ISBE ID: 150162990250047

School Performance Goals

12th Grade & Graduation Goals

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

Continuous Improvement Work Plan

Lincoln Park High School

Developing a CIWP Team

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

CIWP Team Page 1 of 1

Lincoln Park High School

High School Goal Setting

9th Grade - EXPLORE

11th Grade - ACT

SY2012 Goal SY2013 Goal SY2014 Goal

10th Grade - PLAN

12th Grade & Graduates

Climate & Culture

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

SY2012 Goal SY2013 Goal SY2014 Goal

Lincoln Park High School

High School Goal Setting

SY2012 Goal SY2013 Goal SY2014 Goal

SY2012 Goal SY2013 Goal SY2014 Goal

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

Lincoln Park High School

School Effectiveness Framework

The school has established goals for student

The school has established clear, measurable goals for

HS Goals are based on multiple factors from school performance

Trends in ACT and PSAE results over period from 2001-2011:

Daily observations (informal classroom visits) with feedback to

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

Lincoln Park High School

School Effectiveness Framework

Each teacher is invested in the success of the school

Teachers and staff members participate in leadership roles in one

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

Lincoln Park High School

School Effectiveness Framework

Instructional Leadership Team (ILT)

Monitoring and adjusting

ILT membership - members from all departments within the school;

Data analysis by all staff members in opening days of school year.

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

Lincoln Park High School

School Effectiveness Framework

DIMENSION 2: Core Instruction

Each grade level or course team has a year-long scope

Curriculum maps and common units of instruction are developed by

Curriculum teams use common instructional materials that are

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

Lincoln Park High School

School Effectiveness Framework

School-wide, teacher team and classroom data is

School-wide assessment data is provided to staff when it becomes

Date Stamp November 22, 2012

Lincoln Park High School