0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Teste1 Resol

1. The document contains the solutions to problems from a topology and real analysis exam. 2. For problem 1, the space X is shown to not be Hausdorff, and any convergent sequence can have 2 possible limits. 3. For problem 2, the space R∞ is shown to be dense in and connected in Rω.

Uploaded by

Edmilson Barros
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

Teste1 Resol

1. The document contains the solutions to problems from a topology and real analysis exam. 2. For problem 1, the space X is shown to not be Hausdorff, and any convergent sequence can have 2 possible limits. 3. For problem 2, the space R∞ is shown to be dense in and connected in Rω.

Uploaded by

Edmilson Barros
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

FUNDAMENTOS DE TOPOLOGIA E ANALISE REAL o 1 Semestre 2010/2011 1o Teste 5-11-2010 Durac a o 1h 30m

1. (2 val.) Let X = Z+ with the topology generated by the basis { 2n 1, 2n }, n Z+ . Show that X is not Hausdor. How many limits can a convergent sequence in X have? Answer: Let z Z+ . Any neighborhood of z contains a basis element at z, that is, if z U with U open, then {z, z + 1} U, z odd, or {z 1, z} U, z even. Hence, z and z + 1 (or z and z 1, z even) do not have disjoint neighborhhods, and X is not Hausdor. Let zn z in X, then for n N, zn {z, z + 1} (or zn {z 1, z}, z even). It follows that we have also zn z + 1 (or z 1, z even) and, moreover, that if w z, z + 1 then zn does not converge to w. We conclude that any convergent sequence has exactly 2 limits. 2. (1.5 val.) Let R be the space of real sequences with the product topology and R be the subspace of sequences such that for some N N, xn = 0 for n > N. Show that: a) R is dense in R . Answer: Want to show that R = R . Let x = (xn ) R and U be a neighborhood of x, U = nZ+ Un , where Un = R, for n n1 , ..., np and Uni is neighborhood of xni . If yn = xni , for n = ni and yn = 0 otherwise, then y = ( yn ) R U. Hence any neighborhood of x intersects R , so x R and the result follows. b) R is connected. Does it follow that R is also connected? Answer: Write R = NN RN , where RN is the space of sequences with xn = 0 for n > N. Since RN is homeomorphic to RN , under the map x (x1 , ..., xN ), and RN is connected, RN is also connected. Moreover, (0, 0, ...) NN RN . Therefore, R is connected, being the union of connected sets with one point in common. Since the closure of a connected set is connected, R is also connected. 3. (3 val.) Let X be a topological space. Show that: 1

a) For any A, B X, A B = A B. Answer: Since A B A B, have A B A B = A B (the union of closed sets is closed). On the other hand, A A B, hence A A B and the same for B. Hence A B A B. b) Any nite union of compact sets is compact. Answer: Let A = K1 ...Kp , with Kp compact, and take an open cover {U } of A. Then {U } covers each Ki so that we can take a nite subcover of Ki . The (nite) union of these nite subcovers yields a nite subcover for A. Hence A is compact. c) Let A X be closed and f : A [0, 1] be continuous such that f = 0 on A \ U, for some U A, open in X. Then the function g : X [0, 1] extending f and such that g = 0 on X \ A is continuous. (Hint: pasting lemma.) Answer: Let h(x) = 0 be dened on the closed set X \ U. Then on A (X \ U) = A \ U, we have f = h. Since A is also closed, A (X \ U) = X, and f , h are continuous, by the pasting lemma we have that g : X [0, 1] with g = f on A and g = h = 0 on X \ U X \ A is continuous. d) Let now X be locally compact Hausdor and K X compact. Then: i) There exists an open set V such that K V and V is compact. Answer: Since X is locally compact Hausdor, any x X has a neighborhood Vx with Vx compact. Then {Vx }xK is an open cover for K and since K is compact, we can take a nite subcover Vx1 , ..., Vxp . If we let V = Vx1 ... Vxp , then V is open, K V and V = Vx1 ... Vxp , by a), which is a compact set by b). ii) There exist a continuous function g : X [0, 1] and a compact set K K such that g(K) = 1 and g(x) = 0 for x K . Answer: Let K = V as in i). Since K is compact Hausdor (it is a subspace of a Hausdor space), it is normal, so we can apply Urysohns lemma. 1 Have that K is closed in K (compact and K Hausdor), and V is open in X, hence in K V , so K \ V is also closed. It follows that there is a continuous f : K [0, 1] such that f (K) = 1 and f (K \ V ) = 0. Then take g extending f as in c).
Note that we cannot apply Urysohns lemma directly to X, since locally compact Hausdor spaces are not necessarily normal.
1

4. (2 val.) Prove or disprove: a) Any regular second countable space is normal. Answer: True. By Urysohns metrization theorem, any regular second countable space is metrizable, hence normal. b) Any rst countable space is second countable. Answer: False. Let X be any uncountable discrete space: it is rst countable, since {x} is a basis for neighborhoods of x, but it does not have a countable basis, since any basis must contain all the open sets {x}, for x X, and X is uncountable. (Another example: Rl = R with the topology generated by [a, b[, a, b R: it is rst countable, take [r, q[, with r x < q, r, q Q, but not second countable, since for any a R, [a, b[ contains a basis element which is also a neighborhood of a, so any basis contains at least one set [a, ba [ for some ba . Since R is uncountable, any basis is uncountable. Note that in this case Q is dense in Rl , so it is also separable.) 5. (1.5 val.) Let (X, d) be a metric space. Show that: a) A X is totally bounded if and only if A is totally bounded. Answer: Recall that a set is totally bounded if for any > 0, there is a nite cover by balls. If A is totally bounded, then A A is also totally bounded (any cover of A is also a cover of A). Now assume A totally bounded, and let > 0. First note that if < then B(x, ) B(x, ): let y B(x, ), so can take x B(x, ) B( y, ). Then d(x, y) d(x , x) + d(x , y) < . If we take then < , since A is totally bounded, can cover A by nite balls, A B(x1 , ) ... B(xp , ) and we have A B(x1 , ) ... B(xp , ) B(x1 , ) ... B(xp , ). Hence A is totally bounded. b) If (X, d) is complete, then A X has compact closure if and only if it is totally bounded. Answer: In a complete metric space, a subspace is compact if and only if it is closed and totally bounded. Hence, A is compact if and only if A is totally bounded (it is closed) if and only if A is totally bounded, by a).

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy