Unit - 2 Bhander - Se Sir

GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Lahar Branch canal Division
Lahar (District Bhind)
LAHAR BRANCH CANAL FEEDER PIPELINE SCHEME

PART -1 (CANAL)
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
Designed Irrigation
Kharif :- 0 Ha
Rabi :- 10000 Ha
Total :- 10000 Ha
Cost of Unit-I :- 0 Lakh
Cost of Unit-II :- 2469.99982 Lakh
Total Cost :- 2470.00 Lakh
Cost per hectare :- 0.25 Lakh / hectare
CHIEF ENGINEER
RAJGHAT CANAL PROJECT
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT,DATIA
MADHYA PRADESH
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No. Particulars Page no.
VOLUME 1 - DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
1 Project Report
2 Index Map
3 Salient Features
4 Checklists
5 Irrigation Planning
6 General Abstract
7 B.C. Ratio
8 Unit wise Cost Estimates
VOLUME 2 - DRAWINGS
1 Index Map
GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATIONS
Term of abbreviation Meaning
CBIP Central Board of Irrigation and Power
CCA Culturable Command Area
CWC Central Water Commission
ETo Evapo Transpiration
FRL Full Reservoir Level
G&D Gauge & Discharge
GIR Gross Irrigation Requirement
Ha Hectare
ICA Irrigable Command Area
IS Indian Standards
LBC Left Bank Canal
LPCD Litre Per Capita per Day
LSL Lowest sill Level
MCM Million Cubic Meter
MDDL Minimum Draw Down Level
MP Madhya Pradesh
MWL Maximum Water Level
NZE New Zero Elevation
R.G.S. Rain Gauge Station
RBC Right Bank Canal
RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete
SPF Standard Project Flood
SPS Standard Project Storm
3
SALIENT FEATURES
4
CHECK LIST
5
CHECK-LIST
I General Data
1 Name of the Project LAHAR BRANCH
CANAL FEEDER
PIPELINE SCHEME
2 Location:-
(a) State Madhya Pradesh
(b) District Datia
(c) Tehsil Seondha
(d) Longitude/Lattitude 78°41'54.52"E/ 26°
6'43.00"N
(e) Survey of India Topographical Map reference No. (s) 54J/12
(f) Earth quake Zone number
(g) Complete address for correspondence along with pin code/E-Mail eebccdn10lahar@gm
ail.com
3 Category of the Project :
(a) Irrigation / Multipurpose Irrigation
(b) Storing or diversion Storing
II PLANNING
4 Has the Master Plan for overall development of the river basin been prepared NA
and stages of basin development discussed briefly
5 Have the alternatives proposals (including set of smalaler developments vis-a- Yes
is a single large development) been studied and their merits and demerits
discussed
6 Does the scheme fit in the overall development of the river basin and has its Yes
priority in the overall development of the basin discussed?
7 Have the other Departments concerned with the development been informed No
8 Is the present schemes proposed to be executed in stages? If so are its

various stages of execution and development discussed in the report?
9 Are the effects of the scheme on the riparian rights on existing upstream and Yes (provision has
downstream projects etc. discussed? been made
for existing projects)
10 Has the Provision for municipal and industrial water supply been made? Yes
III INTER STATE AND INTERNATION ASPECTS:-
11 Are there any international/interstate issues involved? If so have these issues No international
been identified and present status of agreement or tribunal decision indicated /Interstate issues.
specially indicated specially in respect of
a Sharing of water No
b Sharing of cost NA
c Sharing of benefits (irrigation, flood control, power etc.) NA
d Acceptance of the submergence by the upstream state No issues
e Compensation of land coming under submergence No issues
f Settlement of oustees No issues
g Any other No issues
Note:- if there is no agreement state the present position against each item -
above
6
IV SURVEYS
12 Have the detailed topographical surveys been carried out for the following
items and maps prepared as per prescribed scales (Refer Section-3 and
Annexure-I)
a River surveys Yes
b Reservoir surveys Yes
c Head work surveys (dams, dykes, ogee spillway, weirs etc and auxiliary Yes
components)
d Plant site and colonies No
e Canals, branch canals and water conductor system Yes
f Major canal structures Yes
g Power house, switch-yard, surge shafts, tailrace No
h Tunnel (s) adits, penstocks etc NA
i Surveys (Detailed and Sample) of areas of the command for OFD and No
drainage works.
j Soil surveys No
K Surveys for soil conservation No
m Any other surveys i.e. Archaeological. Right of way communication No
V GEOLOGY INVESTIGATIONS
13 Have the geological surveys for the following items been carried out (Refer
Section 3 Para 4.3 and Annexure 2) and report on geology appended?
a Regional as a whole Yes
b Reservoir Yes
c Head works and energy dessipation area Yes
d Power house and appurtenances NA
e Intakes and Regulators Not Done
f Major canal structures No
g Tunnels pen stock hills etc No
h Communication routes No
i Any others No
VI SEISMIC INVESTIGATIONS
14 Has the seismicity of the region been studied and co-efficient of -
vertical/horizontal acceleration for the various structures discussed?
15 Has the approval of the standing committee for recommending design if No
seismic co-efficient for river valley project been obtained
16 Is there possibility of liquefaction of foundations? If so whether liquefaction
studies been carried out?
VII FOUNDATION INVESTIGATIONS
17 Have the detailed foundation investigations (including in-situ tests and
laboratory tests) for the following structures been carried out (Refer Section 3
para 4.3 and Annexure (and detailed reports appended?
a Earth and Rock fill dam Yes (Only Preliminary
Surveys)
b Masonry / Concrete dam Yes (Only Preliminary
Surveys)
c ogee spillways/Weir/head regulators etc Yes (Only Preliminary
Surveys)
d Canal & Canal Structures Yes (Only Preliminary
Surveys)
e Power house tunnels, transformer caverns desilting chambers surge NA
tanks/shafts intakes
7
f Pump house NA
g Any other NA
18 Are there any special features affecting the designs Nil
VIII CONSTRUTION MATERIAL SURVEYS
19 Have the surveys and laboratory tests for the following construction materials
been carried out (refer section-3 para 4.4 and Annexure III) and reports
appended?
a Soils for impervious, semi pervious and previous zones of earth and rock fill Yes
dam
b Sand Yes
c Rock and aggregate Yes
d Bricks and tiles NA
e Pozzolana NA
f Cement and lime stone Yes
g Steel Yes
h Any other Yes
20 Have the sources for each of the above material been identified and need etc Yes
indicated?
21 Have the proposals for Procurement of Scarce materials been indicated? NA
IX HYDROLOGICAL AND METEOROLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
22 Have the hydrological and meteorological investigations been carried out and
status of following data discussed in report?
a Rainfall Yes
b Temperature No
c Sunshine No
d Gauge and Discharge Yes
e Sediment Yes
f Water Quality No
g Evaporation No
i Has the above data been collected and appended? Yes
X HYROLOGY
23 Is the hydrology dealt with in detail in a separate volume? Have its brief details Yes
been included in this Report?
24 Have an index map and bar chart showing locations of various hydrometric, Yes
climate and rainfall stations and the data availability at those stations been
attached?
25 Have required detail note about project specific hydro-meteorological data
observatories been attached.
26 Have required detail in case of Himalayan rivers, if project being plannend in NA
upper reaches, the satellite imageries of project catchment especially one
during showmelt period (March-May) and one during Monsoon (June-
September) period been attached?
27 Are detail notes about quality consistency processing and gap filling of the Yes
data included?
28 Have hydrological studies been carried out for the following:
a To establish the availability of water for the benefits envisaged Yes
b To determine design flood for the various structures (spillway, weir ogee
spillway etc)
c Sediments storage Yes
d Design flood for diversion during construction Yes
e Tail water rating curve Yes
8
f Evaporation rates from reserviors/concerned area Yes
g Commad area rainfall Yes
29 Has the Ground Water Potential (existing use and additional availability) been Yes
indicated?
30 Have the studies regarding reservoir sedimentation been carried out and Yes
revised elevation-Area Capacity Curves been used in the simulation studies
(working Table)?
31 Have the ecological requirements of water such as low flow augmentation, No
water quality control etc and domestic industrial use and power generation
(thermal, hydel nuclear been included in the Project Report and Incorporated
in the simulation studies?
32 Have the details of the simulation studies (Working Tables) and conclusion Yes
arrived from the various alternatives explaining the factors and assumptions
been included and discussed?
33 Has the number of failures for different aspects been indicated Yes
34 Have the likely desirable and undesirable changes in the hydrologic regime Yes
due to the project been brought out in the report?
35 Is the criteria adopted for selection of the construction diversion flood Yes
discussed?
36 Has the basis for fixing up the storages discussed? Yes
37 Have integrated working tables (for more than one reservoir in the system) Yes
been prepared?
38 Has carry over storage been provided? If so, whether studies for most
economic carry over storage been done?
39 Have the flood routing studies been carried out?
40 Have the back water studies been carried out? No
XI LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT OF OUTSEES
41 Have the type and quantum of land proposed to be acquired in the Yes
submerged area. Project area, area coming under canal and distribution
system. Area required for rehabilitation of the out sees been detailed?
42 Is the basis for provision for land acquisition indicated? Yes
43 Have the rehabilitation measures, amenities and facilities to be provided to Yes
the project Affected persons been discussed and whether their provisions
included in the report? Are these in accordance State's policy/project specific
policy/draft national policy for rehabilitation and resettlement.
44 Are the bases of land acquisition of the submerged area up to FRL/MWL etc Yes
discussed?
XII DESIGN
45 Does the state have established a Central Design Organisation and State
level multidisciplinary Advisory Committees and whether its composition has
been indicated in the report?
46 Has the selection of final location of the headworks and appurtenances in
preference to the other sites investigated and discussed?
47 Has the layout of the project area Viz. location of the headworks work-shop No
sheds offices colonies etc been finalised and discussed?
48 Has the layout of the various major components of the headworks been No
discussed in the light of site feature geology and foundation characteristics
etc?
49 Have the detailed designs been prepared for the following components and
got vetted by CDO?
9
a Earth or rock fill dam, masonry or concrete dam, spillway, ogee spillway, weir, Yes
etc and appurtenance
b Energy dissipation arrangements, training wells etc Yes
c Opening through dams galleries, head regulators penstocks other outlets Yes
sluices
d Regulators Yes
e Canal and water conductor system Yes
f Canal Structures NA
g Pump house, intake structures
h Power house tunnels surge shaft
i Instrumentation
j Power evacuation arrangement
k Design of Hydro Mechanical equipments
50 Have the salient features of the above components and the assumptions Yes
made in the design of above components of the project been indicated and
their basis discussed?
51 Have any model studies been carried out for location of the dam spillway and No
other appurtenances checking the design profile of the spillway energy
dissipation arrangements, location of outlets/regulators etc?
52 Has the final alignment of canal and branch canal been discussed in the light Yes
of various alignments studied?
a Does the canal and design provide for meeting requirements of rush irrigation Yes
b Have any intermediate storages and tail tanks been considered to reduce the yes
canal capacities
53 Are the canal and distribution system being lined and if so what is the No
minimum capacity of the channel proposed to be lined?
54 Is the location of canal structures on main and branch canals fixed after Yes
detailed surveys of the final alignments?
55 Are the regulation arrangements of the off-taking channel both near and away Yes
from the cross regulators discussed?
56 Are sufficient escapes including terminal escapes provided on the Yes
main/branch canal distributaries/minors?
57 Have the basis for adopting waterway for the cross drainage works been Yes
discussed?
58 Have the proposals for rating the canal section by providing standing wave NA
flumes rating of the falls broad crested weirs. V-notches etc been discussed
for the canal and distribution system
59 Have any model studies for major canal structures been carried out and if so No
are the results discussed and incorporated in the designs?
XIII IRRIGATION AND COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT
60 Have the conveyance and field irrigation efficiencies for paddy and upland Yes
crops during Kharif, rabi, etc been indicated, discussed and justified?
61 Have the 10 daily/monthly Crop Water requirements at the canal have been Yes
worked out?
62 Are there any proposals for introducing Warabundi and if so have these No
proposals been discussed in the report and sample calculations for a typical
distributory/minor/sub-minor furnished?
63 Has the present position of Irrigation in the command through existing canals Yes
tanks lift schemes wells etc been brought out in the report
10
64 Are the particulars of all irrigation projects (including minor schemes) Yes
exisiting/proposed in the command been indicated
65 Are there potential areas, indicating the potential where ground water is No
available? If so has the quality of the ground water been indicated?
66 Has the quantum of available ground water been assessed and plan for its No
conjunctives use with surface water been prepared and incorporated in the
report?
67 Have the semi-detailed soil surveys been carried out for the entire command? No at this stage
If not the extent of area surveyed may be indicated
68 Have soil and land irrigability classification brought out in the report? No
69 Is the method used for determining the crop water requirements discussed? Yes
70 Has the pre-project cropping pattern and the proposed cropping pattern along Yes
with justification been furnished?
71 Has the proposed cropping pattern been certified by Centre/State Agricutural Yes
Authorites giving the statement of having considered the soil characteristics
and land irrigability characteristics of the command area in deciding the
percentage of the command area falling under respective crops as suggested
in DPR.
72 Whether drinking water needs of the population projected for the 25-30 years NO
ater construction of the project on enroute and that in the command of the
project considered.
73 Whether the proposed G.W. utilisation is certified by CGWB and a statement NO
furnished.
74 Are the areas and percentages of the CCA that will be irrigated during Kharif, Yes
rabi. Two seasonal, summer and perennial been indicated?
75 Is justification furnished for irrigating perennials and summer crops from the Yes
reservoir?
76 Have the monthly reservoir operation studies been carried out at least for 20 Yes
years and summary on annual basis attached?
77 Have the number of blocks selected for detailed surveys for On Farm Not at this stage
Development (OFD) works including drainage and total area covered by such
blocks been indicated?
78 Have the existing locations of the Trial cum Demonstration Farm inputs No
centres (seeds, fertiliser and insecticides) in the command been indicated and
proposal to strengthen the same discussed?
79 Have the arrangements for financing the OFD works and proposals for Yes
strengthening the same been discussed?
80 Have the agencies responsible for executing of OFD works been identified
and simultaneous planning of execution of OFD works along worth
engineering works discussed?
81 Has the year wise phasing of irrigation development as a result of the project Yes
been discussed?
82 Is the existing communication system telephone, wireless and roads within Yes
command area sufficient to meet the requirement after full development of
irrigation? If not, have the new proposals been planned and discussed?
83 Is the adequacy of the marketing centres in the command area and new Yes
proposals to meet the requirements after full development of irrigation been
discussed?
84 Is there any stabilisation of existing irrigation proposed?
11
XIV FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE
85 Have the various flood control components of the multipurpose project been NA
indicated?
86 have the damage areas in pre-project & post project situations been identified NA
and flood intensities worked out at each of the damage centre (which gets
affected)
87 Have the following flood aspects been discussed?
a Flood cushion in the reservoir
b maximum moderated flood out flows over the spillway etc and if frequency NA
c Existing and proposed safe carrying capacities of the channel below the dam NA
after construction of flood embankment, channel improvement river diversion
etc
d Synchronized moderated peak flood due to released from the dam upstream NA
and un intercepted catchment upto the damage centres
e Average annual expenditure incurred on flood relief works NA
f Area and population affected/likely to be affected before/after the project
g Estimated saving in annual loss of life, property, cattle, crops etc(evaluated in NA
terms of money) due to flood control
88 Have the following drainage aspects of command area been discussed?
a Existing surface and sub-surface drainage network and problems of the NA
drainage congestion, water logging,alkalinity/salinity if any.
b Studies on sub soil water table (premonsoon, post-monsoon etc)
c Maximum intensity of 1,2 and 3 day rainfall NA
d Deficiencies in farm drains
e Deficiencies in existing natural drains
f Proposal for improvement of drainage/water logging/alkalinity/salinity for the NA
area along with justification thereof
g Identification of the area in command which will get benefited due to execution NA
of drainage net-work and benefits thereof in terms of relief from crop damage
increased yields etc
XV NAVIGATION
89 Is the present scheme for remodelling of the existing facilities and or NA
extension of the navigable reach or establishing new navigable reach/
90 Is the existing inland transport system being fully utilised? If not have the NA
bottlenecks in its full utilisation been identified and discussed?
91 Have the surveys for goods and passenger traffic been carried out and NA
discussed?
92 Is the extent of modification required in the existing system discussed and NA
justified?
93 Do design for the canal section and structures taken into account the NA
navigation requirement?
94 Have the proposals to develop the new scheme and phases of development NA
in the different reaches been discussed?
95 If the area is being served by inland water transport have the following been NA
discussed
a The existing toll rates and registration fees for the crafts (size wise) NA
b Proposals for revision of tollage rates and fees, if any NA
c Concurrence of the component authorities for revision of rates and fees NA
d Proposal to subside the tariff, tollage, craft registration fee, passenger fare etc NA
to attract traffic
12
96 Has the state inland water authority been consulted while finalising the NA
scheme and its view point discussed?
97 Has economic justification and viability of the navigation component of the NA
multipurpose project been discussed?
XVI POWER
98 Have the following points been discussed?
a Availability of the power generating capacity in the state as well as in the NA
region from different sources
b Total energy available and peaking capacity of the system in the state as well NA
as in the region from different sources.
c Integrated operation of the system and present status of utilisation in the state NA
as well as in the region.
d Surpluses and shortfalls in the system in the state as well as in the region. NA
e Future plans of power development from different sources in the state/region NA
f Fitment of the scheme in planning of power development of the State/region NA
g Energy generated from the project, firm power, seasonal power and total NA
power
h Proposal for transmission connecting to the existing system/grid. NA
i Project cost per kwh installed and per kwh generated at bus bar as compared NA
to the different hydro-electric, thermal generation and gas projects and
different sources in the stateaswell as in the region to justify the power
component of the project.
j *Whether sufficient surplus off peak power is available for pumping of water NA
from lower to upper reservoir.
k *Actual off peak energy requirement of proposed NA
l *Cost of peak and off peak energy NA
* For pumped storage scheme only NA
XVII CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME AND PLANT AND MANPOWER
PLANNING
99 Are the major components of work proposed to be done departmentally or Proposed to be done
through contractor? by contract
100 Have the various alternatives for construction programme been studied and Not at this stage
proper justification furnished for the final programme adopted?
101 Has the proposed construction programme been prepared and synchronized Yes
for timely completion of each of the major component of work including
command area development
102 Have the year wise quantities of the following materials of construction been
worked out for various components of the project
a excavation separately in soft and hard strata No
b Earthwork infilling impervious semi previous and pervious No
c Rockfill- for dam toe, riprap etc No
d Stone for masonry No
e Coarse aggregate for concrete No
f Sand for filter masonry concrete No
g Gravel for filter No
h Steel of various sizes and type No
i Cement normal quick/slow setting with or without pozzolana, spepcial types. No
13
j Lime-surkhi-pozzolana No
k Scarce material special steel No
l Other material fuel electricity explosive etc No
103 Have the year wise quantities to be executed by machine/labour for each of No
the major component been worked out for each of the above material?
104 Have the labour intensive items of the various major components of the No
project been identified and the quantities of such items worked out?
105 Have PERT chart or CPM diagrams for construction programme of various No
components been made and included in report? Has organisational set up
frequency for project monitoring been indicated in the Report?
XVIII FOREIGN EXHCHANGE

106 Have the details of the plant and machinery, spares, instruments scarce NA
materials to be imported worked out?
107 Has the phasing of imports and sources of imports been discussed item wise? NA
108 Are the imports to be affected under foreign grants/credits or internal NA

resources of the country?
109 Is the scheme covered under state sector or central sector? NA
XIX FINANCIAL RESOURCES
110 Has the concurrence of the State Finance Department been obtained? No
111 Is the scheme included in the Five year/Annual Plan? If not what is the No
present position regarding its inclusion in the Plan.
112 Whether the scheme has already been started? If so is the present stage of No
construction indicated/
113 Have the year wise requirement of funds been indicated? No
114 Is the scheme covered or proposed to be covered under any foreign No
assistance / aid agreement?
XX ESTIMATE
115 Is the separate volume of estimate attached as appendix? No
116 Is the year to which the rates adopted in the estimate relate to indicated? No
117 Have the analysis of rates for various major items of work for the major Yes
components of the project been furnished with the basis for analysis
described?
118 Are the provisions for the following items made on the basis of sample survey
and sub-estimates:
a Distributaries, minor and sub minors Yes
b water courses
c Drainage
d CAD Works
XXI REVENUES
119 Are the bases for the following sources of revenues furnished?
a Betterment levy and proposed for its recovery
b Irrigation cess
c Flood protection cess
d Crop wise water rates
e scale of water for village/city/industrial power/water supply
f Miscellaneous
120 Have these rates been compared with the existing rates at the other projects
in the State/Region?
14
121 In case the rates are being enhanced, has the concurrence of the concerned
departments been obtained
122 Have the organizational set up for the collection of revenue been indicated.
XXII B.C. RATIO

123 Are the allocated cost for the following components of the multipurpose
project workekd out and basis therein furnished?
a Irrigation Yes only for irrigation
b Power NA
c Flood control NA
d Navigation NA
e Water supply NA
f Any other NA
124 Have the various departments of the State/Centre agreed to the sharing of the NA
above allocated cost?
125 Have the crop wise benefits been worked out for irrigated and unirrigated NA
crops being grown before project in consultation with the agriculture
department and statement furnished?
126 Have the crop wise benefits been worked out for the proposed cropping
pattern after the introduction of irrigation in consultation with the agriculture Yes
department and statement furnished?
127 Is the B.C Ratio of Irrigation Projects acceptable or otherwise justified? Yes
128 Is the B.C. Ratio for flood Control Projects acceptable or otherwise justified? NA
129 Is the B.C. Ratio for power component of the project acceptable or otherwise NA
justified.
130 Have the financial and economic return statements been furnished keeping in
Yes
view the phasing of development?
131 Are the benefits other than considered in the BC Ratio and financial return NA
statement been identified?
132 Is the benefit from Gallper land, if proposed, based on lease rates admissible NA
and statement from concerned Central/State authorities furnished?
133 Are the benefits from fisheries, horticulture, if proposed, basedon lease rates NA
admissible and statement from concerned Central/State authorities furnished
XXIII ECOLOGICAL ASPECT

134
a Is the area likely to have any of the following environmental and ecological Not anticipated
problems due to the altered surface water pattern? If yes, whether preventive
measures have been discussed?
1 Excessive sedimentation of the reservoir and the upper reaches of the river No
and its tributaries tailing into reservoir
2 Water logging salinity/alkalinity No problem
3 Quality of surface and ground water
4 Ground water recharge Expected in a small
way
5 Health hazard water borne diseases industrial pollution etc. NIL
6 Submergence of important minerals deposit NIL
7 Submergence of monuments/archeological sites NIL
15
8 Fish culture and aquatic life NIL
9 Plant life (flora) NIL
10 Wild Life
11 Migratory birds NIL
12 National park and sanctuaries NIL
13 Seismicity due to filling or reservoir Not anticipated
14 Likely change in the regime of the river NA
15 Any other Nil
b Have the Environment and forest clearances from MOE and F been To be obtained
obtained? If not what is status thereof?
XXIV COLONIES AND BUILDINGS
135 Has the planning of the colony/building been done keeping in view the Yes
ultimate use for optimum utilisation of the investment?
136 Has an estimate of the extent of higher cost involved been made details Yes
discussed?
137 Are the permanent buildings being constructed required for maintenance of Yes
the project only?
138 Can the buildings other than required to maintenance of the project being NA
constructed be put to some other use after the completion of the project by
the department of any other agencies?
139 Have the interested agencies been consulted in planning of the buildings to No
suit their requirements later on?
140 Have the proposals for disposal of temporary buildings been discussed? No
XXV PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND COOPERATION
141 Are the possibilities of these been discussed in
a Planning No
b Construction
c Improved agriculture practices
d Any other
142 Have public debates about utility of projects been held and the response No
thereof outlined in the Report?
XXVI SOIL CONSERVATION
143 Is the need for soil conservation measures in the catchment of the project No
discussed?
16
Tehsil - Seondha District - Datia
1. BRIEF DESCRIPTION
S. No Description Detail
LAHAR BRANCH CANAL

1 Name of Project
FEEDER PIPELINE SCHEME
2 Estimated Total Cost 2470.000 Lakh
3 Designed Irrigation (ICA) 10000.00 Ha
Kharif -
Rabi 10000.00 Ha
5 Extent of forest submergence 0.00 Ha
Excluding Water Supply Benefit
Benefit Cost Ratio @ 5% Interest/@ 10% Interest 10.57 @ 10%

6
Including Water Supply Benefit
Benefit Cost Ratio @ 5% Interest/@ 10% Interest 10.57 @ 10%
7 Cost Per Ha on CCA 0.25
Excluding Water Supply Cost 0.25
17
2. CONSTITUENCY DETAILS
S. No Description Detail
LAHAR BRANCH CANAL

1 Name of project
2 Nearest village Near Village Berchha
3 Assembly No 22, Seondha
4 Name of MLA Kuwar GhanShyam singh
5 Parliament No 02, Bhind -Datia
6 Name of MP Dr Bhagirath Prsad
18
3. CHECK LIST FOR ACCORDING A.A. IN IRRIGATION DEPT
LAHAR BRANCH CANAL

1 Name of scheme
2 Tehsil Seondha
3 District Datia
4 Estimated Cost
Unit:- I Head Works 0.00 Lakh
Unit:- II Canal 2470.00 Lakh
Total 2470.00 Lakh
5 Area Proposed for Irrigation
a)Kharif -
b)Rabi 10000.00 Ha
Total 10000.00 Ha
6 Costs per ha of CCA 0.25 Lakh
7 Benefit Cost Ratio 10.57 @ 10%
Excluding Water Supply Benefit ( 5% / 10%) 10.57 @ 10%
Including Water Supply Benefit ( 5% / 10%) 10.57 @ 10%
Whether cost per acre is within Permissible limit

8 Yes
(indicate permissible limit)
It not indicate the reason for which proposed the

9 The Cost is reasonable
scheme
Is there any budget provision if so far how much and for

10 -
what year
Whether the scheme has been technically cleared by

11 -
the competent authority
Whether the scheme has been included Five year plan

12 -
with what provision
The period required for preparing the Detailed estimate

13 -
for giving technical Sanction
The period for which the scheme is proposed to be

14 -
complete
Whether the collectors certificate regarding willingness

15 -
with prescribed Performa
Whether the cultivated area in submergence is within in

16 -
the limit
19
4. PROFORMA T.C 70 (II)
LAHAR BRANCH CANAL

1 Name of scheme
2 a) Name of officer who investigated the scheme -
b) Name of officers who have inspected the scheme -
3 a)Estimated cost of scheme 2470.00 Lakh
b)Cost per ha(CCA) 0.25 Lakh
c) Whether the above cost per ha is reasonable Yes

a) Villager served and the prevalent crop pattern
4
according to the statements of agriculture statistics
b) Crop pattern (with name and area of crop) Proposed (Ha)
Kharif
Paddy 0.00 Ha
Maize 0.00 Ha
Total 0.00 Ha
Rabi
Wheat Hyd 5500.00 Ha
Gram 1500.00 Ha
Oil Seed 3000.00 Ha
Total 10000.00 Ha
Grand total 10000.00 Ha
Intensity of Irrigation 100%

c) Letter from agriculture department collector regarding
the acceptability of the crop pattern and willingness to No.
pay the water rate attached or not
Does the scheme find the place in the plan program
5 and in within the district ceiling indicated by CE for No.
program
it is an Ex-mal guzari tank of other Revenue tank. Have
6 the detail required vide the CE No 1027-YG of 64 dtd 2- NA
1-1997 regarding the ownership etc
a) Is this a pick up nala diversion of regulate. Schemes
have been discharge Regulate scheme. Discharge
7 observation. Have been carried out and for what
diversion. However statement of discharge have been
enclosed
b) if not had the S.E satisfied himself about the
NA
adequacy of discharge assumed
Has the adequate survey of canal being carried out and
Some Preliminary hindrance but
8 preliminary satisfied that there is no hindrance later on
later sorted out.
the utilization of irrigation benefits
20
5. CHECK STATEMENT
(To accompany T.C – 70)
LAHAR BRANCH CANAL

1 Name of scheme
2 Location of near village Near Village Berchha
3 Constituency No & Name 02, Bhind -Datia, 22, Seondha
4 Name of
a) M.P. Dr Bhagirath Prsad
b) M.L.A Kuwar GhanShyam singh
5 Block Seondha
6 Cost (Rs. Lakhs) 2470.00 Lakh
7 Culturable command area 10000.00 Ha
8 Cost per Ha 0.25 Lakh
10 Cropping pattern
Kharif -
Paddy 0.00 Ha
Maize 0.00 Ha
Total 0.00
Rabi
Wheat Hyd 5500.00 Ha
Gram 1500.00 Ha
Oil Seed 3000.00 Ha
Total 10000.00 Ha
Grand Total 10000.00 Ha
Intensity of Irrigation 100%
11 Storage & Utilisation
12 Live Storage
Required
Provided
Reason for not providing the required capacity Required capacity is provided
21
13 Dead Storage
14 Submergence
Gross
Pvt
Forest Land
15 Submergence percentage of Total irrigation 0.00%

U.S.R of MPWRD in Force from
16 C.S.R on which the estimates is based
01-09-2017
17 Provision of higher percentage if any No provision has been made
18 General tendered percentage in the area At U.C.S.R
19 Land compensation per
Irrigated private land

As per Collector Guidelines for
Land Rates 2019
Unirrigated private land
Forest Land @ Rs. 15.00 Lakhs per Ha
22
6. PROFORMA TO ACCOMPANY A.A. CASE WIDE GOVT OF M.P. IRRIGATION DEPT

NO. 1/22/38/M.A/3 BHOPAL/DL.304.81
1 Net Sown Area of Block 53998
2 Present Potential of Irrigation 7694.175
Present Percentage of Irrigation in the block from all

3 45.00%
sources
Designed Area proposed for irrigation from the scheme

4 10000.00 Ha
under construction in block
Percentage of Irrigation of the block after completion of

5 100.00%
this scheme
6 Area proposed for irrigation from the present scheme 10000.00 Ha
Increase in the percentage of irrigation of the block

7 55.00%
concerned by the on-going scheme Sr.no(iv)
It may further be reported whether scheme falls in the

8 command of a major project. Either under construction No
of completed.
23
लहार ब्ाांच कैनाल फीडर पाइपलाइन स्कीम
Rkglhy % सेंवडा ftyk % दतिया
लहार ब्ाांच कैनाल फीडर

1 ;kstuk dk uke
पाइपलाइन स्कीम
2 fodkl[k.M सेंवडा
miyC/k ty Hkjko {kerk dk
3 izLrko fdl lanHkZ esa ysa
miyC/k flapkbZ {ks= esa flapkbZ gsrq
dk;Zikyu ;a=h] लहार शाखा
4 izLrko drkZ
नहर सांभाग लहार
5 fo/kkulHkk {ks= 22, सेंवडा
6 fo/kk;d dk uke कां वर घनश्याम तसांह
7 laln lnL; dk uke डॉ भगीरथ प्रसाद
8 vuqekfur ykxr 2470.00 Lakh
9 izLrkfor flapkbZ 10000.00 Ha
fodkl[k.M dk flapkbZ izfr'kr orZeku esa leLr
10 45.00%
L+=ksrksa ls
leLr L+=ksrksa ls flapkbZ izfr'kr fuekZ.kk/khu ;kstukvksa
11 100.00%
ds iw.kZ gksus ij
12 ftys dk flapkbZ izfr’kr -
13 Mwc esa d`f"k ;ksX; Hkwfe dk {ks=Qy 0.00 Ha
14 ftyk Lrj dk ty nj ckon izek.k i= layXu
15 d`f"k foHkkx dk Qly i)fr ckcr~ izek.k layXu
ftyk lykgdkj lfefr@ifj;kstuk Lykgdkj lfefr
16 gS
dk vuqeksnu gS@ ugh
ykHkkfUor vkfnoklh d`"kdksa dh la[;k ,o Hkwfe ds
17 ugha
izfr'kr dk izek.k i= gS@ugha
d½Mwc esa rFkk vU; mi;ksx esa ou Hkwfe ds vf/kxzg.k
18 gsrq D;k foHkkx }kjk izLrkfor izi= esa tkudkjh ugha
layXu gS @ ugha
¼[k½D;k ou foHkkx ds LFkkuh; vf/kdkjh dh lgefr
19 ugha
yh xbZ gS
¼x½D;k ou Hkwfe ckcr~ tkudkjh fu/kkZfjr izi= esa
20
foHkkx dks Hksth xbZ gSA
60 izfr'kr fo’oluh; ty vkod dk fdruk izfr'kr
21
mi;ksx fd;k x;k gS
22 o"kZ 2019&20 esa ctV izko/kku gS@ugh ugh
;kstuk ds fy;s fdl izdkj ds foRrh; izko/kku
23
izLrkfor gSA
24

1 ;kstuk dk uke
2 Rkglhy @ftyk सेंवडा/दतिया
3 fuokZpu {ks= dk uke o ua 22, सेंवडा
4 fo/kk;d dk uke कां वर घनश्याम तसांह
5 izLrkfor en
6 izLrkfor flapkbZ
7 ¼d½ lrgh 10000.00 Ha
8 izfr ,dM+ ykxr
9 ¼d½ lrgh 0.25 Lakh
10 ;kstuk dh izLrkfor ykxr 2470.00 Lakh
12 ;fn O;orZu ;kstuk gS rks ty dk cgko t:jr ugha gS
13 tydj nsus ds laca/k esa ftyk/kh’k layXu gS
14 d`f"k foHkkx dk Øki&iSVuZ laca/kh vfHker layXu g
15 ftyk ;kstuk e.My ftyk ijke’kZnk=h dh lgefr
16 Cykd rglhy leLr L=ksr dk flapkbZ
17 ykHkkfUor xzkeksa dh la[;k 82
18 ctV dh izko/kku dh fLFkfr
19 Mwc ds jdos dk fooj.k rFkk flapkbZ ds HkkSfrd {ks=
¼d½ d`f"k ;ksX; Hkwfe 0.00 Ha
¼[k½ 'kq) ou Hkwfe 0.00 Ha
¼x½ ljdkjh Hkwfe 0.00 Ha
dqy 0.00 Ha
20 ;fn dk;Z vkfnoklh mi;ksxtuk ds {ks= izLrkfor gks rks
vkfnoklh dk izfr’kr ¼vkfnoklh Hkw & LFkkf;Ro dk

izfr’kr ckcr~
22 ;kstuk fdrus o"kZ djuk izLrkfor gS\ 1.5 o"kZ esa
23 izLrkfor ;kstuk ds cukus ls flapkbZ izfr’kr D;k gksxk 100.00%
24 izkDdyu fdl lh-,l-vkj- ij cuk gS\ ;w-,l-vkj & 2017

25 Åaps nj ds fy;s izkDyu esa izko/kku gS\ ugha
25
9- ty lalk/ku foHkkx dh ifj;kstukvksa ds ijh{k.k gsrq tkap fcUn

1 ;kstuk dk uke
ftyks ds uke tgkW ;kstuk dk;kZfUor ,oa {ks=
2 ftyk % दतिया
ykHkkfUor gksxk
fodkl [kaM @ [ksM+ks ds uke tgka ;kstuk dk;kZfUor
3 सेंवडा
,oa ykHkkfUor gksxh
4 ;kstuk dk izkdkj मध्यम ;kstuk
5 ;kstuk dk en
6 ;kstuk dh ykxr yk[k :i;ks esa 2470.00 Lakh
7 Ykxr izfr gsDVj 0.25 Lakh
8 izLrkfor okf"kZd flapkbZ ¼1989gs-½ lrgh 10000.00 Ha
9 Mwc esa vkus okyh ou Hkwfe dk {ks=Qy 0.00 Ha
Mwc esa vkus okyh ou Hkwfe dh Lohd`fr dsUnzh; 'kklu
10 ugha
ls izkIr dh gSA
11 Mwc esa vkus okyk {ks=
d- xkao dh la[;k
[k- ifjokjksa dh la[;k &
x- dqy vkcknh &
12 bl ds iquZokl gsrq izLrko lacaf/kr ykxr
13 ;kstuk fdl iapo"khZ; ;kstuk esa 'kkfey dh xbZ gSA iapo"khZ; ;kstuk esa izLrkfor gSA
;kstuk dh rduhdh dsUnzh; ty vk;ksx ;k l{ke iz’kkldh; Lohd`fr gsrq Hksth tk
14
vf/kdkjh ls izkIr gq;h gS ;k ugha jgha gS
15 ty lalk/ku eaMy }kjk vuqeksfnr gSa gak
ubZ ;kstuk@pkyw ;kstuk@iqujhf{kr ;kstuk fd;k
16
tkuk @dh
iz’kkldh; Lohd`fr gsrq Hksth tk
d- iz’kkldh; Lohd`fr dk o"kZ
jgha gS
[k- vc rd O;; dh xbZ /ku jkf’k &
17 ykxr c<+ tkus ds dkj.k la{ksi esa &
ftl iapo"khZ; ;kstuk esa 'kkfey dh xbZ mldk ljy
18 &
Ø-
mDr ifj;kstuk ds fy;s ;kstuk en esa n’kkZb xbZ /ku
19 &
jkf’k
20 ;kstuk ds eq[; en esa n’kkZ;h x;h jkf’k &
21 orZeku esa flafpr Hkwfe dk izfr’kr
d- 'kkldh; L=ksrksa ls 45.00%
[k- v'kkldh; L=ksrksa ls &
x- dqy 45.00%
26
ifj;kstuk ds iw.kZ gksus ij c<+h gqbZ vfrfjDr flafpr
22 55.00%
Hkwfe dk izfr’kr
23 ykHkkafor vkfnoklh d`"kdks dk izfr’kr
24 ykHkkafor gksus okys fo/kku lHkk {ks= लहार
25 ;kstuk ls ykHkkafor gksus okyh vkcknh
d- vkfnoklh
[k- gfjtu
x- dqy vkcknh
26 mn~ogu flapkbZ ;kstuk,a
d- ;fn uydwy ij vk/kkfjr gks rks izLrkfor vFkok
vklikl ds uydwiksa
dh {kerk rFkk MsfUlVh losZ{k.k fjiksZV
fe-?k-eh- @ ls-eh-
[k- lrgh L=ksr dqy miyC/k Hk.Mkj.k fe-?k-eh- vFkok
de ls de cgko flapkbZ ekg esa ?k-eh-@ls-eh-
27 iw.kZ gksus ij ;kstuk lapkyu] la/kkj.k vk;@O;;
d- dqy O;; okf"kZd
[k- izfr gsa- flafpr Hkwfe O;;
28 fo’ks'k Vhi dksbZ ugha
27
WATER PLANNING
28
FOR YEAR 1 2008-09 LAHAR BRANCH CANAL FEEDER PIPELINE SCHEME
RABI
TABLE-4 WHEAT 3 MV 5500 Ha
Soil Requireme
Requireme Water
Moisture nt at canal Water Total Total
nt at canal requireme requiremen Fortnightly Monthly
Consum Gross Net head with
Crop Plant Use Effectiv effective head with 84 % nt at cnal t at canal water water
ptive Adjustm Water 64 % canal
Forthnight ETo Factor (Pre Rain fall e Rain requiremen canal head by head by requiremen requiremen
Use ent Requirem efficiency
(Kc) Sowing) fall t at field efficiency gravuty pressure t at head of t at head of
(Etc) SMADJ ent GIR
NIR for flow in flow in canal in canal in
For 30 Gravuty
pressure MCM MCM MCM MCM
Days flow in mm
flow at
1 43 0.92 39.56 39.56 0 0 39.56 61.81 47.1 3.4 0 3.4
JANUARY 8.03
2 49 1.10 53.9 53.9 0 0 53.9 84.22 64.17 4.63 0 4.63
3 50 1.10 55 55 0 0 55 85.94 65.48 4.73 0 4.73
February 10.78
4 64 1.10 70.4 70.4 0 0 70.4 110 83.81 6.05 0 6.05
5 74 0.92 68.08 -68.08 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
March 0
6 93 0.53 49.29 -49.29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 95 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APRIL 0
8 110 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 121 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MAY 0
10 129 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 102 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JUNE 0
12 89 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 88 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JULY 0
14 68 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 72 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AUGUST 0
16 72 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 76 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SEPTEMBER 0
18 79 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 83 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OCTOBER 0
20 73 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 63 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOVEMBER 0
22 52 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 47 0.31 14.57 60 74.57 0 0 74.57 116.52 88.77 6.41 0 6.41
DECEMBER 8.07
24 44 0.44 19.36 19.36 0 0 19.36 30.25 23.05 1.66 0 1.66
CWR (1 Year)
TABLE-6 OIL SEED 2RA 3000 Ha
Soil Requireme
Requireme Water
(Etc) SMADJ ent GIR
For 25 Gravuty
Days flow in mm
flow at
1 43 1.10 47.3 47.3 0 0 47.3 73.91 56.31 2.22 0 2.22
JANUARY 4.72
2 49 1.09 53.41 53.41 0 0 53.41 83.45 63.58 2.5 0 2.5
3 50 0.93 46.5 -46.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
February 0
4 64 0.52 33.28 -33.28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 74 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
March 0
6 93 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 95 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APRIL 0
8 110 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 121 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MAY 0
10 129 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 102 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JUNE 0
12 89 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 88 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JULY 0
14 68 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 72 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AUGUST 0
16 72 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 76 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SEPTEMBER 0
18 79 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 83 0.00 0 60 60 0 0 60 93.75 71.43 2.81 0 2.81
OCTOBER 3.87
20 73 0.31 22.63 22.63 0 0 22.63 35.36 26.94 1.06 0 1.06
21 63 0.48 30.24 30.24 0 0 30.24 47.25 36 1.42 0 1.42
NOVEMBER 2.64
22 52 0.50 26 26 0 0 26 40.63 30.95 1.22 0 1.22
23 47 1.09 51.23 51.23 0 0 51.23 80.05 60.99 2.4 0 2.4
DECEMBER 4.67
24 44 1.10 48.4 48.4 0 0 48.4 75.63 57.62 2.27 0 2.27
CWR (1 Year)
TABLE-7 GRAM N2 RA 1500 Ha
Soil Requireme
Requireme Water
(Etc) SMADJ ent GIR
For 40 Gravuty
Days flow in mm
flow at
1 43 1.05 45.15 45.15 0 0 45.15 69.46 53.75 1.04 0 1.04
JANUARY 1.4
2 49 0.96 47.04 -31.36 15.68 0 0 15.68 24.12 18.67 0.36 0 0.36
3 50 0.68 34 -34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
February 0.21
4 64 0.42 26.88 -17.92 8.96 0 0 8.96 13.78 10.67 0.21 0 0.21
5 74 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
March 0
6 93 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 95 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
APRIL 0
8 110 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 121 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MAY 0
10 129 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 102 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JUNE 0
12 89 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
13 88 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
JULY 0
14 68 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 72 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AUGUST 0
16 72 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
17 76 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SEPTEMBER 0
18 79 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 83 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
OCTOBER 0
20 73 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
21 63 0.23 14.49 60 74.49 0 0 74.49 114.6 88.68 1.72 0 1.72
NOVEMBER 2.07
22 52 0.29 15.08 15.08 0 0 15.08 23.2 17.95 0.35 0 0.35
23 47 0.83 39.01 39.01 0 0 39.01 60.02 46.44 0.9 0 0.9
DECEMBER 1.97
24 44 1.05 46.2 46.2 0 0 46.2 71.08 55 1.07 0 1.07
CWR (1 Year)
SUMMARY OF FORTHNIGHTLY WATER REQUIREMENT
TABLE- TABLE- TABLE- TABLE- TABLE

TABLE-4 TABLE-6 TABLE-7
1 2 3 5 -8
TOTAL
SOYAB OIL OIL OIL TOTAL
RICE MAIZE WHEAT GRAM MONTH
Forthnight EEN SEED SEED SEED FORTHN
0HYTP 1 KH 3 MV N2 RA LIY(MC
1KH 2RA 2RA 2RA IGHTLY
M)
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.40 0.00 2.22 1.04 0.00 6.66
JANUARY 14.15
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.63 0.00 2.50 0.36 0.00 7.49
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.73
February 10.99
4 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.05 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 6.26
5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
March 0.00
6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
APRIL 0.00
8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAY 0.00
10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
JUNE 0.00
12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
JULY 0.00
14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
AUGUST 0.00
16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SEPTEMBER 0.00
18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.81 0.00 0.00 2.81
OCTOBER 3.87
20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.00 1.06
21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 1.72 0.00 3.14
NOVEMBER 4.71
22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.22 0.35 0.00 1.57
23 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.41 0.00 2.40 0.90 0.00 9.71
DECEMBER 14.71
24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 2.27 1.07 0.00 5.00
GROSS 48.43
CWR (1 Year)
TABLE- TABLE- TABLE- TABLE- TABLE
TABLE-4 TABLE-6 TABLE-7
1 2 3 5 -8
TOTAL
SOYAB OIL OIL OIL
RICE MAIZE WHEAT GRAM FORTHN
MONTH EEN SEED SEED SEED
0HYTP 1 KH 3 MV N2 RA IGHTLY
1KH 2RA 2RA 2RA
(MCM)
JANUARY
1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.03 0.00 4.72 1.40 0.00 14.15
February
2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.78 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 10.99
March
3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
APRIL
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAY
5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
JUNE
6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
JULY
7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
AUGUST
8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SEPTEMBER
9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
OCTOBER
10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.87 0.00 0.00 3.87
NOVEMBER
11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.64 2.07 0.00 4.71
DECEMBER
12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.07 0.00 4.67 1.97 0.00 14.71
GROSS 48.43 TRUE
CWR (1 Year)
SUMMARY OF FORTHNIGHTLY WATER REQUIREMENT OF YEAR
TABLE-1 TABLE-2 TABLE-3 TABLE-4 TABLE-5 TABLE-6 TABLE-7 TABLE-8

TOTAL TOTAL
Forthnigh RICE MAIZE SOYABEEN WHEAT WHEAT WHEAT GRAM GRAM FORTH MONTH
t 0HYTP 1 KH 1KH 3 MV 0 LV 1 MV N2 RA N2 RA NIGHTL LIY(MC
Y M)
1 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.40 0.00 2.22 1.04 0.00 6.66
JANUARY 14.15
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.63 0.00 2.50 0.36 0.00 7.49
3 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.73
February 10.99
4 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.05 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 6.26
5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
March 0.00
6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
APRIL 0.00
8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MAY 0.00
10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
JUNE 0.00
12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
JULY 0.00
14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
AUGUST 0.00
16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SEPTEMBER 0.00
18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.81 0.00 0.00 2.81
OCTOBER 3.87
20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.00 1.06
21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 1.72 0.00 3.14
NOVEMBER 4.71
22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.22 0.35 0.00 1.57
23 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.41 0.00 2.40 0.90 0.00 9.71
DECEMBER 14.71
24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66 0.00 2.27 1.07 0.00 5.00
GROSS 48.43
CALCULATION OF DUTY
OCTOBOR NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH

Particu Ist IInd IInd Ist IInd Ist IInd Ist IInd Ist IInd Total CWR
S.No.
lars Fortni Fortni Ist Fortni Fortni Fortni Fortni Fortni Fortni Fortni Fortni Fortni in MCM
ght ght Fortnight ght ght ght ght ght ght ght ght ght
19 20 21 22 23 24 1 2 3 4 5 6
2.81 1.06 3.14 1.57 9.71 5.00 6.66 7.49 4.73 6.26 0.00 0.00 48.430
For 80 % of consumptive use 38.744
Duty (Considering 10 forthnights) = 0.299
Duty (Considering 2 consecutive fortnights) = 0.568
Duty (Considering 2 consecutive fortnights) = 0.454
l/s/Ha Adopted Duty = 0.45
GENERAL ABSTRACT
36
GENERAL ABSTRACT
UNIT-II
S. No Particulars TOTAL
(Canal)
I. Direct charge of works
Sub Heads
1 A- Preliminary 10.00 10.00
2 B- Land 7.57 7.57
3 C- Masonry - -
4 D- Regulators & Mesauring device - -
5 E - Fall - -
6 F - Cross Drainage works - -
7 G - Bridge 0.00 0.00
8 H - Escape - -
9 I - Navigation Works - -
10 J - Power Plant Civil works - -
11 K- Building 10.00 10.00
12 L- Earth Work 1996.17 1996.17
13 M- Plantation 0.00 0.00
14 N - Tank and Reservior,RCC Duct - -
15 O- Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00
16 P- Maintenance 62.08 62.08
17 Q- Special T & P - -
18 R- Communication 63.00 63.00
19 S- Power Plant & Electrical System 0.00 0.00
20 T- Water Supply Works - -
21 U- Distributaries, Minors & Sub-minors 0.00 0.00
22 V- Field Irrigation Systems - -
23 W - Drainage - -
24 X - Environment & Ecologys - -
Y - Loss of stocks and unforseen (0.25% of
25 -
works less A+B+M+O+X) -
26 Z - Provision for power generation - -
TOTAL of - I Works Rs 2148.81 Lakh Rs 2148.81 Lakh
Establishment Charges (3% of cost of Unit - I
II. 64.24 64.24
works less B-Land Cost)
ADD 12 % GST on Works only 256.95 256.95
2470.00 2470.00
Total Direct Charges Rs 2470.00 Lakh Rs 2470.00 Lakh
Total Direct and Indirect Charges Rs 2470.00 Lakh Rs 2470.00 Lakh
GRAND TOTAL Rs 2470.00 Lakh
Total CCA (in Ha) 10000.00
Cost Per Ha without power plant 0.25
Sub Divisional Officer Executive Engineer

Lahar Branch canal Sub div.NO-2 Lahar Branch canal Division
Lahar (District Bhind) Lahar (District Bhind)
37
GOVERNMENT OF MADHAYA PRADESH
TABLE- EXISTING CROP PATTERN AND PRODUCTIVITY BEFORE PROJECT
(All rates in Rs., Amount in Rs. Lakh and Area in Ha.)
Sr.No. Crop Area Yield Total Price Gross Breakup of Expenditure Net
(Qtl/ yield (Qtl) per Qtl. Income (in Seed Fertilizers, Chemicals etc. Human, Animal Total Income
Ha) Rs. Lakh) & Machinery & Expenditu (in
Rate/ Amt. Rate/ Ha Amt. Rate/ Amt. re Lakhs)
Ha (Rs.) Ha
Kharif (Rs.) (Rs.)
1 PADDY 0 9 0 1200 0.00 3800 0.00 4500 0.00 6000 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 MAIZE 0 10 0 1100 0.00 2000 20.00 4000 40.00 5000 0.00 60.00 -60.00
Total - - - 20 40 - 60 - 60
Rabi
1 Wheat Hyd 3000 12 36000 1500 540.00 1500 45.00 3000 90.00 6000 180.00 315.00 225.00
2 Gram 500 10 5000 2500 125.00 1200 6.00 2500 12.50 4500 22.50 41.00 84.00
3 Oil Seed 1000 7 7000 2600 182.00 1200 12.00 3000 30.00 6000 60.00 102.00 80.00
Total 4,500 48,000 847.00 63.00 132.50 263 458.00 389.00
Other Crops
Total - - - - - - - -
Add pumping cost of lift 0
GRAND TOTAL 4500 48,000 847.00 83.00 172.50 262.50 518.00 329.00
38
GOVERNMENT OF MADHAYA PRADESH
TABLE- PROPOSED CROP PATTERN AND PRODUCTIVITY AFTER IRRIGATION
(All rates in Rs., Amount in Rs. Lakh and Area in Ha.)
Sr.No. Crop Area Yield Total yield (Qtl) Price per Gross Breakup of Expenditure Net Income
(Qtl/ Ha) Qtl. Income Seed Fertilizers, Chemicals etc. Human, Animal & Total (in Lakhs)
(in Rs. Machinery & Misc Expenditure
Lakh)
Rate/ Ha Amt. Rate/ Ha Amt. Rate/ Ha Amt.

(Rs.) (Rs.) (Rs.)
Kharif
1 PADDY 0 35 0 1800 0.00 4500 0.00 5500 0.00 8000 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 MAIZE 0 25 0 1600 0.00 2500 0.00 4500 0.00 6000 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total - - - - - - - -
Rabi
1 Wheat Hyd 5500 35 192500 2200 4235.00 2200 121.00 6000 330.00 9000 495.00 946.00 3289.00
2 Gram 1500 20 30000 3500 1050.00 1500 22.50 5000 75.00 6750 101.25 198.75 851.25
3 Oil Seed 3000 15 45000 3500 1575.00 1500 45.00 6000 180.00 9000 270.00 495.00 1080.00
0 0
Total 10,000 2,67,500 6,860 188.50 585.00 866.25 1,639.75 5,220.25
Other Crops
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00
Add pumping cost of lift 0
GRAND TOTAL 10000 2,67,500 6860.00 188.50 585.00 866.25 1639.75 5220.25
39
GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Table-11.1 BC Ratio Calculation
Before
S.NO. Item After Irrigation
Irrigation
1 Gross Receipt
(i) Gross value of farm produce 847.00 6860.00
(ii) Dung receipts (at 30% of the fodder expenditure) 38.12 205.80
Total Gross Receipts (1) = (i+ii) 885.12 7065.80
2 EXPENSES
(i) Expenditure on Seeds 83.00 188.50
(ii) Expenditure on Fertilizers,Chemicals etc., 172.50 585.00
(iii) Expenditure on hired labour (human, animal & machinery) & Misc 262.50 866.25
(iv) Fodder expenses (as percentage of gross value of produce)
a) 15% Gross value of farm produce before irrigation 127.05
b) 10% Gross value of farm produce after irrigation 686.00
(v) Depreciation on implements at 2.7% of the gross value of farm produce 22.87 185.22
(vi) Share and Cash Rent
a) 5% Gross value of farm produce before irrigation 42.35
b) 3% Gross value of farm produce after irrigation 205.80
(vii) Land Revenue at 1% of gross value of farm produce 8.47 68.60
Total Expenses (2) = (i+ii+iii+iv+v+vi+vii) 718.74 2785.37
3 NET VALUE OF PRODUCE
(i) Total Gross receipts (Total 1) 885.12 7065.80
(ii) Total Expenses (Total 2) 718.74 2785.37
Net value of produce (3) = (i-ii) 166.38 4280.43
4 ANNUAL BENEFITS
(i) Net value after irrigation (3) 4280.43
(ii) Net value before irrigation 166.38
from Irrigation 4114.05
(iii) from Fish production 0.00
(iv) from Power production (Being incidental, not considered) 0.00
(v) from Water Supply 0.00
a) Domestic 0.00
b) Industrial 0.00
Net Annual Benefits (4) = (i-ii)+(iii)+(iv) 4114
5 COST OF PROJECT
(i) Estimated cost of the Project 2470
(ii) Cost of land development 0.00
Total 2470
6 ANNUAL COSTS
(i) Interest on capital @ 10% (Estimated total cost of the project
including cost of land development) 247.00
40
(ii) Depreciation of the project @ 1% of the cost of project for 100 years
life of the project and @ 2% for 50 years life of the project 24.70
(iii) Annual operation and maintenance charges 14.82
(iv) Maintenance of the head works @ 1% of H/W cost excluding B-Land -0.08
(v) Depreciation of the pumping system @ 3.33% of the estimated cost of
the pumping system assuming life of the system as 30 years (80000 HOURS
RUNNING) (Applicable to lift irrigation) 39.41
(vi) Depreciation of the rising mains @ 2% of the estimated cost of the rising
mains assuming life of the system as years (Applicable to lift irrigation) 13.05
(vii) Power Charges for lift irrigation @ per Ha. (Applicable to lift irrigation) 50.40
Total Annual Costs (6) = (i + ii + iii + iv + v + vii + vii) 389.30
Average Benefit Cost Ratio = Annual Benefits (4) / Annual Costs (6) 10.57

Superintending Engineer Chief Engineer

Rajghat Canal Circl) Rajghat canal Project
Water Resources Department Datia ( M.P) Water Resources Department Datia
41
CANAL
42
Tehsil - Seondha Primary
Sr. No. Particulars RM1
1 Duty 0.45 lps
2 CCA 10000.00 Ha
3 Discharge 4.50 cumesc
4 Seepage Loss 0.170 cumesc
3 Discharge (Say) 4.67 cumesc
4 Velocity in Rising main 2.10 m/sec
5 Length of Rising Main 2100 m
6 Diameter of Rising main 1.70 m
7 Level to be pumped 169.30 m
8 MDDL 142.00 m
9 Static Head 27.30 m
10 Friction Loss in RM including
bend and valve losses 2.9
m
14 Design Head 30.24 m
15 Power Requirement 1669.36 KW
16 Total Power Requirement 1669.36 KW
17 Pumps Provided 1670.00 KW
1.67 MW
Sub Engineer Sub Divisional Officer Executive Engineer

Lahar Branch canal Sub div.NO-2
Lahar Branch canal Division
UNIT - II CANALS
COST ABSTRACT OF UNIT -II (PIPE LINE NETWORK)
Amount in Lakhs
UNIT-II
S. No Particulars Remarks
(Canal)
I. Direct charge of works
Sub Heads
1 A- Preliminary 10.00
2 B- Land 7.57
3 C- Masonry -
4 D- Regulators & Mesauring device -
5 E - Fall ( For canal only ) -
6 F - Cross Drainage works ( For Canal Only ) -
7 G - Bridge ( For Canal Only ) 0.00
8 H - Escape ( For Canal Only ) -
9 I - Navigation Works -
10 J - Power Plant Civil works -
11 K- Building 10.00
12 L- Earth Work
L1-Transmission Line 30.00
L2- Pump House 1183.37
L3- Rising Main/GM 652.33
L4- 20% of RM/GM 130.47
13 M- Plantation
14 N - Tank and Reservior -
15 O- Miscellaneous 0.00
16 P- Maintenance 62.08
17 Q- Special T & P -
18 R- Communication 63.00
19 S- Power Plant & Electrical System 0
20 T- Water Supply Works -
21 U- Distributaries, Minors & Sub-minors 0.00
22 V- Field Irrigation Systems -
23 W - Drainage -
24 X - Enviorment & Ecologys -
Y - Loss of stocks and unforseen (0.25% of works less
25 -
A+B+M+O+X)
26 Z - Provision for power generation -
TOTAL of - II Works ₹ 2148.81 Lakh
Establishment Charges (3% of cost of Unit - I works less B-
III. 64.24
Land Cost)
12% GST 256.95
Total Direct Charges ₹ 2470.00 Lakh
Total Direct and Indirect Charges ₹ 2470.00 Lakh
TOTAL COST UNIT II 24.70

44
Unit‐II
"A" Preliminary survey
Abstract of Cost
S.No. Description Qty. Rate Unit Amount
(in Lacs)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 "A" Preliminary survey, 1 Job 10 Lack 10.0
investigations drawings
& design and estimate
for the project,
Preparation &
Processing of LA cases
for private/Govt cases,
obtaining mendatory
clearance from
respective department
like revenue
environment, , PWD,
MPRRDC, Local bodies
etc.
Total Rs.- 10.0
Say Rs. 0.10 Crores

45
Unit‐II
"A" Preliminary survey
Detailed Estimate
S.No. Description No. Length Width Height/ Qty.
Depth
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 "A" Preliminary survey, 10 - - - 1 Job
investigations drawings &
design and estimate for the
project, Preparation &
Processing of LA cases for
private/Govt cases,
obtaining mendatory
clearance from respective
department like revenue
environment, , PWD,
MPRRDC, Local bodies
etc.

46
Unit‐II
"B" Land
Abstract of Cost
S.No. Description Qty.(Ha.) Rate Unit Amount
(in (in Lacs)
1 2 3 4 5 6
For Canal & Net work
Temprary acqution (rising
main) 0.7140 1.5 1.071
For pump house & DC(Near canal) 0.2 10 2
Total 3.071
Total 3.071
Forest Land for canal(Rising main) 0.3 15 Ha 4.5
Total 7.571

47
Unit-II
L-Earth Work
ABSTRACT OF COST
S.No. Particulars Amount (Lakhs)
1 2 3
1 Approach Channel & Pump House 1183.37
2 Transmission Line 30.00
3 Rising Mains 652.33
4 20% for valves, specials, Major river crossings, surge 130.47
control and automation.(for Rising main)
Total :- 1996.17

48
Unit-II
L-Earth Work
Abstract of cost for Transmission Line
ABSTRACT OF COST
S.No. Particular Qty. Rate Unit Amount
In Lakhs
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Erection of transmission lines and allied
work wherever required etc. complete as
per drawings, design and direction of
engineer-in-charge.
A - 33 KV from nearest Ht 3 10 30
substation/powerhouse to Pump house
near balancing reservoir
Grand Total 30.0
Say in Crore 30.000

49
Unit-II
L-Earth Work
Abstract of cost for construction of Rising Main
ABSTRACT OF COST
S.No. Particular Qty. Rate Unit Amount In Lakhs
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Manufacturing, supplying, laying in position, aligning, jointing,
testing and commissioning of electric resistance welded submerged
arc welded mild steel (min Fe-410 grade) delivery pipes of
specified diameter and plate thickness (As per relevant IS code)
with welded ends wherever required and provided one coats of 400
micron thick food grade epoxy paint for inner surface and shotcrete
coating for outer surface including cost of all materials, machinery,
labour, cutting, bending, welding, finishing, painting, conveying to
spot, lowering, aligning, jointing, arranging water for testing,
ultrasonic/hydraulic testing at fabrication site and after laying and
jointing at specified test pressure etc. complete as per
specifications and approved drawings.
6.08.1.15 (a) Rising Main 1700 Dia.Pipe 2100 31063.4 m 652.33
Grand Total 652.33

Say in Crores 6.52

50
Design Discharge Calculations
3
Total Discharge = 4.67 m /sec
Detention time = 10 min
3
Capacity Required = discharge*detention time = 2802.00 m
Say = 2802000 litre
Page 31
Unit-II
L-Earth Work
Abstract of cost for construction of Pump House,
ABSTRACT OF COST
S.No. Particular Qty. Unit Rate Amount In Lakhs
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Civil work for rising main ,Approach channel & pump house complete as 1.67 MW 40 66.80
per drawing & design and as per direction of engineer in charge.(For 25 %
extra Efficency)
2 Design, manufacture, supply, erection,trial running, performance testing 1500x2

and commissioning of vertical turbine pump of approved make
conforming to IS:
1710 having specified pump output under specified operating head
coupled to HT motor of adequate HP rating operating at 6.6 KV with
flexible coupling, self water lubricated thrust bearings, discharge Tee with
flanged end for connecting delivery pipe with all other standard
accessories and safety devices etc., complete as per specifications, terms
and conditions of contract.
V T pump with more than 1000 hp up to 1500 hp motor 2000.00 Per set/hp 8792 175.84
3/6.10.1 Design, fabrication, supply, assembling, testing and commissioning of HT 2
pump panel board made of sheet metal duly painted with recess for cable
entries at the bottom suitable for 6.6 kv equipped with vacuum circuit
breaker of suitable capacity for 1 number incoming 1600A and 2 no. 630 A
outgoing of suitable capacity with aluminum bus bars of 1600Amp
metering panel, protection complete with wiring as per specification and
approved drawing.
4/6.10.1 Panel board with fitting common to all pumps 2 Per set 917400 18.35
5/6.10.2 Additional VCB including sheet metal enclosure, extension bus bars, 2 Per 324148 6.48
metering and relays complete for each additional pump mounted on set/pump
common panel board.
6/6.11 Design, fabrication, supply, assembling, testing and commissioning of 2 Per pump 27522 0.55
remote control panel made of sheet metal in desk type configuration duly
painted with recess for cable entries at the bottom equipped with
operation consoles, indicators, enumeration windows, hooters and all
other accessories assembled and ready to receive control wires and other
connections etc. complete as per specifications and approved drawings.
7/6.12 Supply, installation and commissioning of High testing Power factor 2 Per KVAr 489.28 0.01
capacitor bank of specified KVAr rating operating at 6.6 KV with all
accessories etc. complete as per specifications, terms and conditions of
contract.
8/6.13 Supply, installation and commissioning of Load Break Switch with HRO 2 Per set 231643.5 4.63
fuses, CBCT and ELR in sheet metal enclosure with operating console etc.
complete for use along with Power Factor Capacitor Bank as per
specifications, terms and conditions of contract.
9/6.15 Supply, and installation of temperature scanner suitable for operating at 2 Per set 47399 0.95
110 V DC or 230 V AC mounted in a duly painted sheet metal enclosure
provided with NO/NC relays for transmitting single to VCBS for tripng with
audible alarm for both windings and bearing RTDs with all other
accessories for satisfactory functioning of the system etc. complete.
10/6.16 Supplying, installing and commissioning electrode actuated water level 2 Per set 96327 1.93
transmitter of approved make with all accessories to protect against dry
running of pump etc. complete.
11/6.17 Supplying, installing and commissioning electro-magnetic type flow meter 2 Per set 733920 14.68
of approved make with all accessories including display panel in pump
house.
32
12/6.18 Supply, and installing of floor mounting type LTAC panel approved make 2 Each 232408 4.65
fabricated from sheet metal and painted with provision for suitable
incoming and specified number of outgoing feeder inlets with metering
panel and all other accessories complete for auxiliary supply as per
specifications, terms and conditions of contract etc. complete.
13/6.19 Supply, and installation of Auxiliary transformer 6.6 KV/433 Volts 160 KVA 2 Each 198770 3.98
copper wound, insulating oil filed with all accessories etc. complete as per
specifications.
14/6.21 Supplying, laying and connecting xLPE 6.6 KV () 3 core cable suitable for 28
KA short circuit rating with end connecters from HT panel to motor,
Starters, capacitor panels etc. complete as per directions.
15/6.21.2 3 core 120 sqmm cable 900 M 581.02 5.23
16/6.22 Supplying, installation and commissioning of soft starter for specified KW 1670.00 Per kw 917 15.31
load operating at 6.6 KV with load break switch, metering, protection by- load
pass vacuum contactor with all accessories etc. complete housed in
painted sheet metal enclosure.
17 1 NOS Major River crossing 20.00 laks/m 1 20
18 1 NOS canal crossing 20.00 laks/m 1 20
19 Approch bridge upto PH 200.00 laks/m 2 400
20 Cost of VFD 0.18 MW 20.00 3.68
21 Energy Dsiipation Arrangemet Near Canal (Distribution Chamber 2802000.00 liter 15 420.30
15rs/liter)
Grand Total 1183.37
Say in Crore 11.83
33
Unit‐II
"K" Building
Abstract of Cost
S.No. Description Qty. Rate Unit Amount (Rs.
in Lacs)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Construction of 2 Fully furnished 500x2 1000 Each 10.00
Residential units of 500 sq ft. carpet area
with all amenities & furnitures, fixtures,
electrical water supply, fencing,
everything complete at 2 locations of
pump house as directed
Total 10.00
Say 0.10 Crore

34
Unit‐II
"P" Maintenance
Abstract of Cost
(Rs. in
Lacs)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Total
Maintenance for 5 years@0.6% of per
1 3.00% 2069.17 % 62.08
year (L+R+U)
Total 62.08
Say 0.62 Crore

35
Unit‐II
"P" Maintenance
Detailed Estimate
S.No. Description No. Length Width Height/De Quantity
pth
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Maintenance for 5 2069.2 1 Job

years@0.6% of per year
(L+R+U)

Water Resources Sub Division Water Resources Division
36
Unit‐II
"R" Communication
Abstract of Cost
(Rs. in
Lacs)
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Construction of Road as per PMSY 2.1 30 - 63.00
specifications
Total 63.00
Say 0.63 Crore

37
Unit‐II
"R" Communication
Detailed Estimate
S.No. Description No. Length Width Height/De Quantity
pth
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 Construction of Road as per PMSY 2.1 2.10

specifications

38

Unit - 2 Bhander - Se Sir

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unit - 2 Bhander - Se Sir

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Unit - 2 Bhander - Se Sir

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH

WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT

Lahar Branch canal Division

Lahar (District Bhind)

LAHAR BRANCH CANAL FEEDER PIPELINE SCHEME

S. No. Particulars Page no.

VOLUME 1 - DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

8 Unit wise Cost Estimates

Term of abbreviation Meaning

CBIP Central Board of Irrigation and Power

CCA Culturable Command Area

CWC Central Water Commission

ETo Evapo Transpiration

FRL Full Reservoir Level

G&D Gauge & Discharge

GIR Gross Irrigation Requirement

ICA Irrigable Command Area

LBC Left Bank Canal

LPCD Litre Per Capita per Day

LSL Lowest sill Level

MCM Million Cubic Meter

MDDL Minimum Draw Down Level

MWL Maximum Water Level

NZE New Zero Elevation

R.G.S. Rain Gauge Station

RBC Right Bank Canal

RCC Reinforced Cement Concrete

SPF Standard Project Flood

SPS Standard Project Storm

8 Is the present schemes proposed to be executed in stages? If so are its

f Fitment of the scheme in planning of power development of the State/region NA

XVIII FOREIGN EXHCHANGE

108 Are the imports to be affected under foreign grants/credits or internal NA

XXII B.C. RATIO

XXIII ECOLOGICAL ASPECT

LAHAR BRANCH CANAL

2 Estimated Total Cost 2470.000 Lakh

3 Designed Irrigation (ICA) 10000.00 Ha

5 Extent of forest submergence 0.00 Ha

Excluding Water Supply Benefit

Benefit Cost Ratio @ 5% Interest/@ 10% Interest 10.57 @ 10%

Benefit Cost Ratio @ 5% Interest/@ 10% Interest 10.57 @ 10%

7 Cost Per Ha on CCA 0.25

Excluding Water Supply Cost 0.25

Tehsil - Seondha District - Datia

LAHAR BRANCH CANAL

2 Nearest village Near Village Berchha

3 Assembly No 22, Seondha

4 Name of MLA Kuwar GhanShyam singh

5 Parliament No 02, Bhind -Datia

6 Name of MP Dr Bhagirath Prsad

Tehsil - Seondha District - Datia

3. CHECK LIST FOR ACCORDING A.A. IN IRRIGATION DEPT

LAHAR BRANCH CANAL

Unit:- I Head Works 0.00 Lakh

Unit:- II Canal 2470.00 Lakh

Total 2470.00 Lakh

5 Area Proposed for Irrigation