Truck - Cycle Time Analysis PDF
Truck - Cycle Time Analysis PDF
Truck - Cycle Time Analysis PDF
net/publication/281624068
Analytics of Cycle Time Phases and Target Load of Electric Mining Loaders-A
case study
CITATIONS READS
3 409
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Metin Ozdogan on 09 September 2015.
Metin Ozdogan
Ideal Makine Danismanlik Ltd. Co., Ankara
Hakki Ozdogan
Ideal Makine Danismanlik Ltd. Co., Ankara
ABSTRACT Cycle Time (CT) of the electric wheel loader comprises of Travel
to Dig (TTDG), Dig (DG), Travel to Dump (TTDMP), Dump (DMP). Travel to
Dig and Travel to Dump phases comprise of Reverse (Rev) and Forward (Fwd)
components. These phases and components are studied for a period of time
based on data of the performance monitor on board and interpreted.
There are (2) two units of 21 m3 bucket electric mining loaders and (9)
nine units of 220 tonnes capacity rock trucks operating at the mine.
1 INTRODUCTION
There exists (2) two 21 cu.m. capacity SR drive electric mining loaders; and
(20) twenty 150 tonnes DC drive off-higway-trucks and (10) ten units of 220
tonnes AC drive off-highway trucks. In Kisladag open pit mine SR drive
mining loaders operate at blasted and abrasive hard rock benches and load into
220 tonnes AC drive trucks and 150 tonnes capacity mechanical drive trucks.
The loader fills into150 tonnes trucks in five passes and loads in 220 tonnes
trucks in 7 passes.
SR drive motorised wheels are of low maintenance type; the rotor has no
commutator, so no commutator surface and brushes and brush holders to
maintain. The loader’s all four tyres are motorised; the motorised wheels have
planetary transmissions.
The seven-day average figures for the CT phases are as follows; Travel to Dig
(TTDG) time is 7,92±0,75 s; Dig (DG) time is 5,32±0,37 s; Travel to Dump
(TTDMP) time is 25,09±1,23 s; Dump (DMP) time is 11.35±1,47 s; and the
phases add up to a Total Cycle Time (TCT) of 49,69±1,87 seconds.
Table 1. Cycle Time components of an electric drive mining loader (21m3)
Avg. 7,92 15,86 5,32 10,71 25,09 50,57 11,35 22,86 49,69
±0,75 ±1,22 ±0,37 ±1,11 ±1,23 ±1,72 ±1,47 ±2,34 ±1,87
Based on the monitoring results of a seven days and two shifts a day operation,
Cycle time component percentages are given below : 15,86 % of total cycle
time is Travel to Dig, 10,71 % Dig, 50,57% Travel to Dump and 22,86 %
constitute Dump phase. See, Table 1 and Figure 2.
Figure 2. Shares of cycle time components of an electrical drive loader (21m3)
According to the analytics, half of the total cycle time is being consumed
in travelling to dump phase, and approximately one quarter of the total cycle
time is consumed in dumping phase. Contrary to expected merely one tenth of
the total cycle time is spend in digging phase.
Table 3. Travel to Dump phase constituents and ratios of electric loader (21m3)
Payload (PL) is the net weight of the material in the bucket. The dead weight of
the bucket and rigging is excluded. Payload Limit (PLL) is the proposed load
limit by the OEM not to exceed optimum bucket load. Exceeding this load limit
implies wear and tear on the equipment and shorter economic life expectancy.
Target Payload (TPL) is the optimum load suggested by the OEM; effort
should be spend to reach the target payload and it is recommended that the
deviation from this load should be in the range of ± 5 %.
If the weight of the load in the bucket gets closer to the Critical Overload
Limit (COLL) equipment enters into self-control mode and stop lifting the
bucket. Upon reducing the load in the bucket by dumping some of the material
to ground, and getting the bucket load reduced to COLL Critical Overload
Limit, it starts lifting the bucket again.
The OEM suggested payload limit (PLL) of P&H / L-1350 loader is 38 tonnes.
The overload limit (OLL) is 10 % excess of payload limit (PLL) which is 41, 8
tonnes. Whereas, critical overload limit (COLL) is 20 % excess of the payload
limit that is 45, 6 tonnes (Wood 2014). When the bucket load reaches the critical
overload limit (COLL), the hoist system stops working to protect the equipment;
when some of the material is dumped off, the hoist system starts functioning
again (Wood 2014).
The target payload (TPL) is taken 10 % lighter than payload limit (PLL)
which is about 34 tonnes. The OEM recommends that the payload deviation of
the target payload should not be greater or smaller than 5 % .
Figure 5. Bucket load types of the electric loader (21m3)
The target payload and deviation ratios of the electric loader (21m3) are given in
Table 4. Based on the monitoring results of the week, average bucket payload is
33±1,5 tonnes, target payload is 34 tonnes, and deviation from the target
payload is minus (-) 2,6 percent, see Table 4.
Table 4.The payload of electric loader (21 m3) and deviation of target payload
The onboard monitor of the electric loader is a real time touch screen interactive
one, thus the operator can interact and improve (adjust) the equipment’s
performance immediately. Critical information like height of the bucket and
bucket angle, payload of every bucket, cumulative truck tray loads, cycle time,
truck loading time, number of passes, total material moved, remaining fuel,
equipment speed, coolant temperature are monitored and recorded (Anon a,
2012).
Target payload and deviations: In the case observed, the haul trucks were of 220
tonnes capacity; and 10 % less of this capacity is accepted as the target load. In
the seven-day observation period tray payloads and the deviation ratios off the
target tray payloads were as follows; target load is 198 tonnes, average
deviation is + 2,5%; average tray payload is 203±10 tonnes, Table 5. Average
truck fill time is 5,7±0,5 minutes, number of passes is 6±0,4 counts, and average
daily production amount is 27,013±1243 tonnes.
Table 5. Payload of the haul trucks (220 t) and deviation of the target payload
The electric haul trucks have onboard production and equipment health
monitors, like electric mining loaders,. The equipment operator has a control
over the monitor interactively. Furthermore, the maintenance and repair teams
and management can follow and reach the monitored data remotely through
satellites and internet systems. Even, the OEM can follow the performance and
equipment health overseas, if permitted.
6 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FEATURES OF THE ELECTRIC
LOADER
The new generation hybrid electric mining loaders are designed and developed
to be used as prime diggers and loaders besides the material handling works.
Electric mining loaders are 4-wheel drive equipment, where as electric mining
haulers are two wheel drive machines. In other words, each and every wheel has
SR drive motors and planetary transmissions. If one of the motorised wheels are
out of order, the loader keeps on working with the other three tyres. At this
specific pit, rock is very abrasive and fort his reason tyre chains are used on four
of the tyres, Figure 6. Motorised wheels generate very high torque at low speeds
and transfer more torque to the ground compared to conventional transmissions
(Norris, J.).
Mean Time To Repair, (M) (MTTR) : The cited features make mean
time to repair of the equipment shorter, since the equipment has fewer
components, and fewer gear boxes and reservoirs to maintain,. The easy to
access maintenance points around the machine and modular components reduces
the mean time to repair; so, the shorter the repair time, the quicker the
equipment back to work, and the higher the productivity is (Anon a, 2014). The
healthof the machine and functioning of the components are monitored and
failures are diagnosed by the computer system’s monitor on board in the
operator’s cab.
Electric Loader’s Productivity, (P) : The longer the mean time interval
between failures and the shorter the mean time to repair the failures, and ease of
maintenance imply that the equipment is expected to be more productive; and
thus, the lowest cost per ton is achieved. Production parameters like bucket and
truck payloads, number of trucks loaded, cumulative payloads etc. and and
productivity parameters like number of passes per truck, cycle times, truck
spotting and filling times etc can be monitored on the screen of the monitor in
the operator cab.
7 CONCLUSIONS
Electrical mining loaders have overcome the bias that the loaders are merely
used in material handling and in auxiliary applications. The electric loaders are
used as main earthmoving equipment in addition to material handling and
favoured for lower fuel consumption, especially in countries where there is a
heavy tax burden on fuel.
The significance of the Target Payload (TPLD) for both the loader and the
haul truck can not be ignored. For an efficient operation, OEM suggests that the
bucket and tray loads should not deviate off the target payload more than ±5
percent which is assumed to be the optimum payload for a sound and productive
operation in the target payload zone (Paterson 2015). Overloading should be
avoided, exceeding the target payload more than the specified + 5 percent is
detrimental to the equipment in the long run. On the other hand, underloading
i.e. the deviation in minus (-) direction means using the equipment under its
capacity which implies loss of money for the mining operation.
REFERENCES
Anon. a, 2012; JoyGlobal P&H, Generation 2 Wheel Loader Product Overview, P&H Mining
Equipment Inc., Milwaukee, USA.
LeTourneau, R.G., 1972; Mover of Men and Mountains, The Autobiography of R.G.
LeTourneau, Moody Publishers, Chicago, USA
Lovejoy, C., 2013; Providing power to people, Mining Magazine, July 2013, London, U.K.
Fleet, M., 2012; Personal communications on “Hybrid Drive Electric Mining Loaders”,
Longview, Texas, USA
Norris, J., 2015 : Personal communications, P&H Mining Equipment LeTourneau Factory.,
Texas, U.S.A.
Orlemann, E.C., 2009; R.G. LeTourneau Heavy Equipment, The Electric Drive Era 1953-
1970, Iconografix, Wisconsin, USA
Ozdogan, M., 2013 : Unpublished photograph, İdeal Makina Danışmanlık Ltd., Ankara
Wood, A., 2013; Electric drive mining class wheel loaders as primary production tools,
IMCET 2013, Antalya, Turkey.