Integrity Management With S-RBI: Using The w-IMS Tool
Integrity Management With S-RBI: Using The w-IMS Tool
Integrity Management With S-RBI: Using The w-IMS Tool
M.A. Tazelaar
SME Risk-Based Inspection & Integrity
V-1102 P11007
E-1102
E-1101 V-1104
P11002 P11006
P11010
P11011
P11005 P11008
P11003 P-1102
C-1102
C-1101
E-1103 A/B
P11012
LP steam
P11001
Fuel gas
Unit 4400
P11009
E-1104 A/B
P-1101
V-1103
P11004
Feed gas
Treated gas
Flare
Unit 1400 1
80
V-1102 54 54 E-1102
34 E-1101 45
20
45 1
90-95 V-1104
47-50
40-48 P-1102
C-1102
C-1101 40
110
E-1103 A/B
LP steam
Fuel gas
Unit 4400 E-1104 A/B
P-1101 100
V-1103
Feed gas
bar
19 °C
45
Treated gas
Flare
Unit 1400
V-1102
E-1102
E-1101
V-1104
P-1102
C-1101
C-1102
E-1103 A/B
LP steam
Fuel gas
Unit 4400 E-1104 A/B
P-1101
V-1103
Feed gas
304L
CS
304L clad
Note: The last two tasks should have been covered in the w-IMS Super User Training
Create the Demand Scenarios based on the information in the Safeguarding Narrative:
Clarify the scenarios in free text, for example:
“External Pool fire in immediate vicinity of C1101”
“valve …. fails in closed/open position Or valve …. fails…”
Complete Susceptibility to Failure Assessment:
Assess the likelihood that a carbon steel relief valve in
Rich Amine Service:
Gets plugged (by fouling)
Is sticking to its seat because of fouling or corrosion product
Mechanically jams
Assess the demand rates for each of the Demand Scenarios
Use the demand rate table in the PRV S-RBI RP
Complete the Consequence to Failure on Demand for each of the Demand Scenarios
Write a failure scenario using the “overpressurisation table” and the overpressurisation information from the
safeguarding narrative for each of the demand scenarios
Complete the Health and Safety consequences based on the failure scenario
What is the Maximum Inspection Interval for each of the Demand Scenarios?
What is the Ultimate Next Inspection Date for INPxx-RV1101A?
Add the assessment to the scope of a new inspection schedule called:
“Recertification”
Recurring at MII
User date at MII from today (note: that may be overdue)
INSPxx-RV1101A/B
Fire: External Pool Fire 100% Relief required
Control failure
Feed control valve 1100PCV001 (FC) fails in the open position 100% relief
Failure of pressure control valve exposes system to 110 barg wet-gas header pressure
Treated gas valve 100PCV002 (FO) fails in the closed position 100% relief
Failure of column pressure controller causes a no flow condition and exposes the system to the upstream
pressure.
Rich amine valve 100LCV003 (FC) fails in closed position 50% relief
Failure of the liquid control valve will cause increase in liquid hold up in column potentially increasing the
pressure to twice the normal operating pressure.
Note: These demand scenarios are completely fictional and intended to complete this exercise.
Shell International B.V. RESTRICTED December 2018 161
Answers Sheet for: ……………………………………………………………….
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12
2. Add the component C1102 BOTTOM with description “C1102 below demister”
4. Open the MCI Infobase and the presentation and determine potential internal and external
degradation mechanisms for this loop using the generic Corrosion Control Document
considering that:
a. All material in this loop is Post Weld Heat Treated Carbon Steel and insulated for heat
conservation
d. Acid gas loading of Rich Amine into column is 0.55 mol/mol and of Lean Amine leaving
the column < 0.1 mol/mol; the lower limit to avoid iron chelate formation and the
higher limit because of ‘rich amine corrosion’ at elevated temperature
e. Like in the rich amine circuit, HSAS are managed below 4 wt.%
5. Describe at least two of the following damage mechanisms (select most applicable) in the
corrosion description (use the degradation modules on the MCI Infobase):
e. Atmospheric Corrosion
g. HIC/SOHIC
Note:
i. If equipment has a design corrosion allowance, add at least one internal wall loss mechanism
ii. Though no strict rule, it makes good sense to select only one internal wall loss damage mechanism to a
component.
6. Assign these two, three or four damage mechanisms to the corrosion loop
7. Suggest IOW variables for the selected damage mechanisms. (suggestions/hints: amine strength,
acid gas loading, temperature)
b. Do the remnant life calculation of the internal wall loss mechanism using the theoretical
corrosion rate from the degradation module (and CUI if you selected that too); use ECH
information to determine remaining corrosion allowance.
Note: When an ECH mentions 0.5 mm wall loss, it is the total wall loss, not the incremental wall loss
between the two inspections.
Note: If you assume CUI and also complete the coating life assessment you get one bonus point
d. Determine the consequence of failure scenario for each degradation mechanism (in
words)
1. Assume one week unit down time for repair, do a guess what economic
consequences would be.
c. The number of inspections completed for C1102 and the discrepancy between CalcSum
and ECH
You should now have a maximum inspection interval for each of the damage
mechanisms assessed in S-RBI. Check the S-RBI next inspection date for each of the
damage mechanisms before proceeding.
10. Add all internal damage mechanisms to the scope of the existing inspection (INSP) schedule for
C1102 and adjust its due date to the first upcoming S-RBI next inspection date.
Threat Identification – Corrosion Loop Example Generic Amine Unit
Treated gas
Unit 1400
V-1102
E-1102
E-1101
V-1104
P-1102
C-1101
C-1102
E-1103 A/B
LP steam
Fuel gas
Unit 4400 E-1104 A/B
P-1101
V-1103
Feed gas
Other comments: