Werewolves, Ghosts, and The Dead-Chapter-3
Werewolves, Ghosts, and The Dead-Chapter-3
Werewolves, Ghosts, and The Dead-Chapter-3
There is significant evidence for an association between wolves and death in the
ancient world, this relating principally to the non-Latin parts of Italy.
Both Carla Mainoldi (in 1984) and Daniel Gershenson (in 1991) have maintained
that the wolf had a particular association with death for the Greeks, as is more
obviously true for the dog (their devouring of corpses cast out, Cerberus, the
Aidos kyneē, etc.).2 But the case for the wolf is not a strong one. None of the
examples Gershenson adduces in support of his thesis seem to me to be cogent
(most of his discussion devoted to the Lykaia). More promisingly, the principal
example in Mainoldi’s portfolio is the Hero of Temesa, mentioned later in this
chapter and then discussed more fully in the dedicated Chapter 5. However, we
must exclude him from our considerations at this point if we are to avoid petitio
principii. Beyond this, the only significant wolves Mainoldi can point to in associ
ation with death have the look of being minor and exotic variations of dogs in
similar roles. Thus, in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes, Antigone protests that she
will not leave her brother’s body exposed to be devoured by wolves, this instead of
1 We shall articulate this point in a slightly more formal way in the Conclusion.
2 Mainoldi 1984:28–30 (for the wolf) and 37–51 (for the dog); Gershenson 1991:98–117.
Werewolves, Ghosts, and the Dead 61
the more usual dogs.3 In the fourth-century ad Great Magical Papyrus in Paris,
Hecate, the underworld goddess of the all-pervasive canine imagery, is given
(amongst a great many others) the epithets Lykō and Lykaina, which may both be
construed as ‘She-wolf ’.4 In the later fifth century bc Sophron had already
Etruscan Aita-Calu
Etruscan art reveals a profound association between wolves, death, and the dead in
that culture. The Etruscan reflex of the Greek Hades was Aita/Eita, and he was iden-
tified with the indigenous Calu.6 Examples abound from the fourth century bc
onwards of his depiction in head or bust only wearing a wolf-head cap. It is possible
that the latter is the Etruscan version of the dogskin cap of invisibility attributed to
Hades in Greek mythological sources.7 Of particular interest are a pair of fourth-
century bc tomb paintings, one from the Golini I tomb at Orvieto and one from
the c. 340–320 bc Orcus II tomb at Corneto (Tarquinia). In both images Aita is
accompanied by his wife Persephone (‘Phersipnai’), both figures being named. In
the Golini tomb the pair reclines at a banquet with the dead man and his family,
and Aita wears a wolf-head cap, while holding a sceptre around which there winds a
snake.8 In the Corneto tomb Aita and Persephone are housed in a cave within the
underworld, and he sits on a rock throne. He again wears a wolf-head cap.9 The
notion that Aita-Hades might dress in a wolf-head cap might suggest an ironic
reading of the assertion of Petronius’ Niceros that his soldier companion was ‘as
brave as Orcus [i.e. Hades again]’, just prior to his wolf transformation.10
Also of great interest here is the striking series of eight scenes on s econd-century
bc Etruscan cinerary urns in alabaster or terracotta. On these a wolf, sometimes a
quite terrifying one, a wolf-headed humanoid, or a humanoid wearing a wolfskin,
with the head as cap, precisely à la Aita, attempts to emerge from a puteal
3 Aeschylus Seven Against Thebes 1041–2; for dogs as the traditional and iconic devourers of the
cast-out or the battlefield dead, see Homer Iliad 1.1–5; further references in Chapter 1.
4 Lyko: PGM IV.2276 (4th c. ad). Lykaina: PGM IV.2546. Cf. Mainoldi 1984:29.
5 Sophron F4B KA/Hordern (cf. Apollodorus of Athens FGrH 244 F102a, apud Stobaeus
Anthology 1.49–50, pp.418–20 W). For Mormolyke see Hordern 2004:137–8, Johnston 1999a:161–99,
Patera 2005 esp. 377–81, 2015:106–44. Note also the mormolykeion, referred to at Aristophanes
Thesmophoriazusae 413–17, Plato Phaedo 77e, Heliodorus Aethiopica 6.2.1, Proclus Commentary on
Plato’s Republic 180.19, Hesychius s.v. μορμολυκεῖα, schol. Aelius Aristides Panathenaicus 102.5
(iii p.42 Dindorf), etc.; cf. Mainoldi 1984:29.
6 For Aita and his place in the Etruscan underworld, see Cook 1914–40:i, 98–9, Krauskopf 1987,
1988, Jannot 2005, 54–71, Rissanen 2012:129–34.
7 E.g. Homer Iliad 5.845, Hesiod Shield 227, Aristophanes Acharnians 390, Plato Republic 612b.
8 LIMC Aita/Calu 5.
9 LIMC Aita/Calu 6. Weber-Lehmann 1995:72–100, with pl. 21–4, offers a detailed analysis of this
tomb’s images.
10 Petronius Satyricon 61–2.
62 The Werewolf in the Ancient World
(a well head), perhaps symbolic of an exit from the underworld, but is prevented
from doing so by a group of men around it, who strenuously hold the creature
back with a chain round its neck or by threatening it with weapons. A calmer man
holds a patera over it and Vanth, the Etruscan female underworld demon and psy-
Ancient authors were intrigued by the cult performance of the Hirpi Sorani on
Mount Soracte, in the Faliscan region 45 kilometres north of Rome, who would
walk barefoot over wood embers in honour of Apollo of Soracte.13 The first extant
11 (1 and 2) Volterra, Museo Guarnacci, inv. 350–1 = LIMC Olta nos. 3 and 5 (from Volterra); (3)
Florence, Museo archeologico, inv. 5781 = LIMC Olta no. 2 (from Chiusi); (4) Pisa, Camposanto, inv.
1906/117 = LIMC Olta no. 4 (from Volterra); (5, 6, and 7) Perugia, Museo archeologico, inv. 107 (or
341, from San Sisto), 367 = LIMC Olta no. 8 (from Palazzone?) and a lost item without inventory
number; (8) Gubbio, Palazzo dei Consoli, inv. 5801 (unknown provenance). Images of all these items
except (7) are reproduced at Chierici 1994:355–61; cf. also Szilágyi 1994, Elliot 1995 and Rissanen
2012:130–4. For Elpenor, see Homer Odyssey 11.1–83 and the Elpenor vase, Boston, Museum of Fine
Arts 34–79 = LIMC Odysseus 149; discussion at Ogden 2001 esp. 43–60, with further references. For
Sthenelus see Apollonius Argonautica 2.911–29, Valerius Flaccus Argonautica 5.87–95; perhaps he is
the perky warrior emerging from his barrow on an askos lid in Boston, Museum of Fine Arts 13.169,
as Schefold and Jung 1989:30 suggest (there is no entry for this Sthenelus in LIMC).
12 The plate was found in Vulci’s Osteria Necropolis, Tomb 177. See Elliot 1995:24–7,
Rissanen 2012:133–4. We might also point to two humanoid figures with wolf-heads attending scenes
of Achilles’ ambush of Troilus on Etruscan Black Figure vases, illustrated at Simon 1973:39 figs. 8–9;
cf. Mainoldi 1984:29.
13 Virgil Aeneid 11.784–8, Strabo C226, Pliny Natural History 7.19, Silius Italicus 5.175–183,
Solinus 2.26. For general discussion, see Wissowa 1894–90, Otto 1913, Franklin 1921:29–31,
Piccaluga 1976, Negri 1982, Rissanen 2012 (where these texts are conveniently reproduced), di
Fazio 2013, Vé 2018:172–8. Strabo identifies the deity in receipt of this sacrifice rather as a goddess,
Feronia, this seemingly a mistake arising from the name of the local town, Lucus Feroniae; cf.
Rissanen 2012:119 n.30.
Werewolves, Ghosts, and the Dead 63
author to mention them is Virgil in his Aeneid. His Arruns prays on the battlefield
to ‘Apollo, guardian of sacred Soracte’, of whom he declares himself to be a pri-
mary devotee and for whom he professes to walk through the embers. He then
asks the god to help him kill Camilla, and his prayer is granted. But when her
Hirpus is indeed the Faliscan dialect equivalent of Latin lupus.15 But Servius
also makes some confusions here: first, he confuses the Hirpi with the Hirpini,
who lived some 200 kilometres distant, around Ampsanctus; secondly, after
correctly explaining the name phrase Hirpi Sorani, in which Sorani is a geni-
tive singular, ‘the Hirpi of Soranus’, he immediately proceeds in the final
words here as if Sorani is, rather, a masculine plural adjective agreeing
with Hirpi.16
Servius’ notion that the Hirpi Sorani lived by plundering is probably a falla-
cious explanation added by the commentator himself (or a prior source) into the
We return now to Herodotus’ Neuri (see Chapter 1), whom the historian describes
as goētes.21 What did he mean by this? His own work affords us no further clues,
unfortunately. He only applies the term elsewhere to a remote race of pygmies
living south of the Libyan desert, without further elaboration.22
17 So Marbach 1929:1131 and Rissanen 2012:121. Rissanen further makes the tendentious claim
(124–6) of a certain parallelism between the myth of the Hirpi Sorani and the rite of the Roman
Lupercalia, in which, as he sees it, ‘wolves’, the luperci, emerge from and return to the Lupercal cave,
supposedly also an underworld entrance. For the Lupercalia see Appendix C: I consider that the asso
ciation of this rite with wolves and certainly with anything resembling werewolves has been overstated.
18 Etruscan late black-figure neck amphora, c.500 bc. Private collection, Basel; the vase is repro-
duced at Rissanen 2012:120–1, figs. 1–2.
19 Colonna 1985:76–7, 2007:113–14, Rissanen 2012:122–3, 129.
20 Cook 1914–40:i, 96–8; but scepticism from Belloni 1986.
21 Herodotus 4.105–7: κινδυνεύουσι δὲ οἱ ἄνθρωποι οὗτοι γόητες εἶναι. Metzger 2011:220–4 dis-
cusses Herodotus’ use of the term here in some detail, without, it seems to me, hitting the key points.
22 Herodotus 2.32–3. It is conceivable that the race’s small stature was a factor in Herodotus’ deci-
sion to deploy the word here, given the term’s application, already in the Phoronis, to the tiny Idaean
Dactyls: see below.
Werewolves, Ghosts, and the Dead 65
23 Suda s.v. γοητεία: γοητεία δὲ ἐπὶ τῷ ἀνάγειν νεκρὸν δι’ ἐπικλήσεως, ὅθεν εἴρηται ἀπὸ τῶν γόων καὶ
τῶν θρήνων τῶν περὶ τοὺς τάφους γινομένων.
24 Reiner 1938 passim, Vermeule 1979:17–19, Burkert 1962 esp. 44–5, Johnston 1999a:103, 1999b:96,
Ogden 2001:110–12, Chantraine 2009 s.v. γοάω, Beekes 2010 s.v. γοάω. Some scepticism from
Bremmer 2016:64–5.
25 It is a pity that the fragments of Aristomenes’ lost comedy Goētes are so uninformative for their
subject.
26 Diogenes Laertius 8.58, incorporating Satyrus F6 Kumaniecki, Gorgias A3 DK and Empedocles
B111 DK/F101 Wright.
27 Porphyry Life of Pythagoras 28–9 (Pythagoras, Abaris, Epimenides); cf. Burkert 1962,
Ogden 2009:9–16, Ustinova 2009:186–7, 194–6, 209–17. I explain my use of the term ‘shaman’ in
Chapter 4.
28 Strabo C589: ἀνὴρ γόης, εἴ τις ἄλλος.
29 Phrynichus Arabicus Praeparatio sophistica p.127 de Borries, reproduced (without being classi-
fied either as a fragment or a testimonium) at TrGF iii p.370: οἱ δ’ ἀρχαῖοι τοὺς τὰς ‘ψυχὰς’ τῶν
τεθνηκότων γοητείαις τισὶν ‘ἄγοντας’. τῆς αὐτῆς ἐννοίας καὶ τοῦ Αἰσχύλου τὸ δρᾶμα ‘Ψυχαγωγός’ [sic];
cf. Aeschylus Psychagogoi FF273-5 TrGF.
66 The Werewolf in the Ancient World
the verb psychagōgeō and apply it to sorcerers that claim (inter alia) to be able to
draw up the souls of the dead. Here the term psychagōgeō is also used in a vivid
metaphorical fashion to describe the ‘soul-drawing’ deception practised by such
sorcerers on the souls of the living, inasmuch as they bamboozle them with their
30 Plato Laws 909b. 31 Gorgias Helen 10, 14; Plato Menexenus 235a, Meno 80a–b.
32 Plato Phaedo 81b.
33 Euripides Hippolytus 1038, Bacchae 234; Xenophon Anabasis 5.7.9; Plato Euthydemus 288b
(sophist), Gorgias 483e-484a, Laws 922a, Hippias Minor 371a, Republic 412e-413d (repeatedly), 598d,
Sophist 234c-235a (sophist), 241b (sophist), Statesman 291c (sophist), 303c (sophist), Symposium
203d (sophist).
34 Plato Philebus 44c, Republic 584a. 35 Xenophon Cyropaedia 8.1.40; Plato Republic 602d.
36 Scholiast Apollonius Argonautica 1.1128, incorporating, inter alia, Phoronis F2 West, Pherecydes
FGrH 3 F47/Fowler and Hellanicus FGrH 4 F89/Fowler. With some weariness I must point out that,
pace Johnston 1999b:96 and (tralatitiously, I presume) Stratton 2007:28, the Phoronis was a poem,
not a poet.
37 Plato Euthydemus 288b; Republic 380d, 381e, 383a.
Werewolves, Ghosts, and the Dead 67
Let us note also, for completeness’ sake, the frequent association of the
goēt- root with other magic-related terms. In particular, it is frequently associated
with words of the ‘drug’/‘spell’ root, pharmakon, pharmakeus (the male equivalent
of phamakis) and pharmassō, from Pherecydes onwards,38 and also with words
Let us return briefly to two of the passages of Latin poetry considered in the last
chapter. As we saw there, Virgil (39 bc) closely associates Moeris’ turning of
himself into a werewolf with his raising of ghosts: ‘By their [sc. Pontic herbs’]
power I often saw Moeris change into a wolf and hide himself in the woods, and
I often saw him use them to rouse ghosts from the bottom of their tombs.’43
Tibullus prays that his bawd-witch should scrabble for her herbs (the tools of her
witchcraft and a wretched meal alike) on graves, and scrabble also for bones
abandoned by her fellow wolves, perhaps in the same place, before transforming
into a wolf: ‘May starvation goad her to madness and send her searching for
herbs on graves and bones abandoned by fierce wolves. May she run bare-
groined and howling through the city . . . .’ There surely is an association here
between the graves and the werewolfism, though Julia Doroszewska may read
these lines a little too reductively in asserting that the witch actually transforms
into a wolf in the graveyard itself.44
38 Pherecydes FGrH 3 F47 Fowler; Gorgias Helen 14 (cf. A3 DK); Plato Laws 649a, 933a, Meno
80a-b, Symposium 203d.
39 Gorgias Helen 10; Euripides Hippolytus 1038, Bacchae 234; Plato Gorgias 483e-484a, Laws 909b,
933a, Meno 80a-b, = Symposium 202e-203a.
40 Plato Republic 413b. 41 Plato Laws 933a.
42 Gorgias Helen 10. However, Xenophon’s reference to Cyrus’ adoption of Median dress as an act
of katagoēteuein (cited above) brings us close to the realm of the mages (magoi) of the Persian empire,
whom Herodotus held to originate in Media (1.101, 107–8, 120, 128), seemingly correctly, even if his
explicit reason for making the connection is his supposition that they took their origin from the witch
Medea (7.62; cf. Hesiod Theogony 956–62, this passage evidently being a post-mid-sixth-century bc
interpolation). Scholars now hold that the magos (Persian makuš) had initially been a priest of a local
Median religion centred around the god Zurvan. For the historical mages of the Persian empire see
Benveniste 1938, Bickerman and Tadmor 1978, Burkert 1983b, Handley-Schachler 1992: 39–69b, 367,
Briant 2002:94–6, 130–4, 244–6, 266–8, Bremmer 2008:235–48, Panaino 2011, and Trampedach 2017.
43 Virgil Eclogues 8.94–100.
44 Tibullus 1.5.53–4; the fuller context and the Latin are supplied in Chapter 1; Doroszewska 2017:15;
Schmeling 2011:256–7 (‘Werewolves are believed to haunt graveyards’).
68 The Werewolf in the Ancient World
Petronius’ Niceros
In the superb werewolf tale Petronius gives to Niceros, with which we began,
ghosts and the underworld assert themselves repeatedly and prominently.45
The paradoxographer Phlegon was a freedman of the emperor Hadrian. The third
of his delightful Marvels brings together two stories of prophecies of doom issued
to the Romans under Glabrio after their defeat of Antiochus III at Thermopylae
and the Aetolians at Heraclea in 191 bc. Phlegon claims to have taken them from
one Antisthenes, possibly the second-century bc historian Antisthenes of
Rhodes. Their ultimate origin must have been in Aetolian resistance propa
ganda.49 In the second of these stories the Roman general Publius (his name per-
haps intended to evoke the historical Publius Cornelius Scipio) goes mad and
starts uttering prophecies for his fellow Romans, first of a further victory for them
against Antiochus, but secondly of an eventual vengeful doom to return upon
them from Asia. He then climbs a tree, from which he proclaims that the truth of
his prophecies will be guaranteed by the fact that a huge red wolf (lykos pyrrhos)
will now come and devour him. The wolf duly appears and Publius presents him-
self to it for consumption. The wolf leaves behind his head, which then proceeds
This story aligns closely with another that Phlegon tells in the second of his
Marvels, this one derived from an unidentifiable Hieron of Ephesus or Alexandria,
and in this case the story evidently originated rather in anti-Aetolian propaganda.
Here Polycritus the Aetolarch (a fictionalized version of Polycritus of Callion) has
died, leaving his wife pregnant. As the local townspeople hold a debate in the
agora about what to do with the ensuing baby, which they find to constitute an ill
omen as being hermaphrodite, the ghost or revenant of the Aetolarch manifests
itself, seizes the baby, devours its body, and leaves its head behind on the ground.
This head then proceeds to utter prophecies of doom for the Aetolians.51 In this
way, we can see that the big red wolf of the Publius tale is structurally equivalent
to the ghost in the Polycritus tale. We may also note that some have contended
that the colour red could in itself also be particularly associated with the dead in
the ancient world.52
colour, as for example in the case of the French folktale ‘The White Wolf ’ collected
by Cosquin and published in 1887.)59
However, even if we exclude all suspicion of werewolves from Phlegon’s story, it
retains some value for us insofar as it does at least seem to provide us with a
59 A father is about to set out on a journey. He asks his three daughters what gift they would like
him to bring back. The elder daughters ask for dresses, but the youngest asks for a talking rose. He
despairs of satisfying her request but at long last comes across a beautiful castle. Hearing voices from
within, he enters and finds himself in a courtyard with a rose bush full of talking flowers. He picks one
for his daughter, whereupon a white wolf falls upon him and threatens to kill him for taking one of his
roses. Upon hearing of the man’s daughter, however, the wolf relents and lets the man go, and take the
rose, on condition that he brings back to him the first person he meets on his return. This is indeed his
youngest daughter, whom he duly takes back to the wolf. The wolf says he has no intention of harming
them: he tells them that he is a fairy condemned to be a wolf by day, but that everything will turn out
well for them if they keep his secret. He gives them a splendid dinner and by night shows himself to
them in the form of a handsome lord. He tells the girl he will marry her and she will be queen of his
castle. The father returns home, whereupon his wife and other daughters press him for the where
abouts of the girl. He eventually tells them, with the result that one of the elder daughters goes to visit
her and demands to know what is going on. Eventually she reveals her lord’s secret, at which point she
hears a terrible howl and the white wolf comes to her only to fall dead at her feet. See Cosquin 1887:ii,
215–17 (no. lxiii), with commentary at 217–30.
60 For Marcellus of Side and his medical poem, see Metzger 2011:150–2.
61 Burkert 1983a:89, Bremmer 2007b:72 and Metzger 2011:161–2 find the significance of February
here in the fact that this was the month of the Roman Lupercalia, but the role of wolves in this festival
has been significantly over-egged (see Appendix C). One might, rather, be tempted to find significance
in the Feralia festival, which took place on 21 February: while the name Feralia signifies ‘Festival of
the beasts’, it was in fact a festival of the dead: Ovid Fasti 2.533–70; cf. Frazer 1929 ad loc. (ii, 431–46),
Wiseman 1995b:70–1.
72 The Werewolf in the Ancient World
Such are their symptoms. One must recognize that lycanthropy is a form of mel-
ancholia. You will treat it by opening a vein at the time of its manifestation and
draining the blood until the point of fainting. Then feed the patient with food
conducive to good humours. He is to be given sweet baths. After that, using the
In fact the second passage quoted here is ultimately derivative of the first.64 We
are told baldly that sufferers of lycanthropy go about in imitation of wolves in all
respects, but beyond this there is little attempt to describe precisely how their
symptoms relate to wolves or werewolves. Indeed, the most significant point of
contact with werewolves would seem to be, precisely, the sufferers’ propensity to
hang around tombs. If this is indeed the principal justification for designating
their disease lycanthropy, then it at least indicates that the association between
werewolves, ghosts, and their haunts was a fundamental one. A lesser point of
contact with wolves or werewolves might be the harrying dogs: as we saw in the
previous chapter, Tibullus’ witch is to be harried by dogs upon transformation
into a wolf.65
This venerable tradition of, as it were, medical lycanthropy continued into the
twentieth century, or at any rate was recreated then. In Old Calabria Norman
We passed a solitary man, walking swiftly, with bowed head. What was he
Pausanias’ intriguing (later second-century ad) tale of the Hero of Temesa, the
wolfskin-sporting ghost of Polites, should feature next here in our chronological
review: indeed, it is the star witness for the association between werewolves and
ghosts in the ancient world. But, given both its complications and its points of
interest, discussion of it is deferred to a dedicated chapter, Chapter 5.69 We will,
however, need to make comparative reference to it in the section immediately
following.
In his Life of Apollonius, written after ad 217, perhaps with some irony, Philostratus
ascribes many miracles to the sage, the Neo-Pythagorean from Tyana. Amongst
them is the following:
When the plague fell upon the Ephesians, and no defence could be found against
it, they sent to Apollonius, and made him their doctor for the disease. He
66 Douglas 1915:176; cf. Johnston 1932. We will encounter a nineteenth-century medical lycan-
thropy patient in C. R. Maturin’s 1824 novel The Albigenses in Chapter 3.
67 E.g. Coll et al. 1985, Keck et al. 1988, Fahy 1989, Koehler et al. 1990, Blom 2014, Moselhy and
Macmillan 2014; cf. Douglas 1992:1–19.
68 De Blécourt 2015b:19. 69 Pausanias 6.6.7–11.
74 The Werewolf in the Ancient World
thought that this was a trip he could not put off, but on saying ‘Let us go’ he was
already in Ephesus.70 I think he did the same thing as Pythagoras, who contrived
to be at once in both Thurii and Metapontum. Apollonius assembled the
Ephesians and said, ‘Do not worry, for I will put an end to the disease this day.’
honour wolves because their nature is so similar to that of dogs (for him, seemingly
in all respects), and again he refers to their ability to interbreed.75 The problem of
the extent to which wolves and dogs are the same or different is well articulated
across the range of Aesop’s Fables.76 In some of these the cunning wolf is con-
75 Plato Sophist 231a; Aristotle Generation of Animals 2.7, 5.2, History of Animals 6.35, 8.28;
Diodorus 1.88.6; cf. Eckels 1937:13, Mainoldi 1984:193, Buxton 1987:65, 76 n.16, Gordon 2015:27.
Dogs and wolves can and do interbreed both in the wild and domestically (today hybrids are deliber-
ately created to serve as pets). Indeed, all members of the Canis genus are interfertile, with the only
obstacle to interbreeding being the disproportionate sizes of individual animals: Musiani et al.
2010b:3–4, Coppinger et al. 2010:45. The ‘genetic distance tree’ of European wolf and dog populations
reproduced at Wayne 2010:27 (after Luchini et al. 2004) demonstrates that (a) dogs as a group are no
further removed from wolves than different subsets of European wolves are from each other; and (b)
Spanish wolves are particularly close to dogs as a group. Neither archaeologists nor biologists can
decide when dogs were first bred out of wolves, possibly in two separate episodes: guesses range
between c.15,000 BP (‘before present’) and c.40,000 BP; see Spotte 2012:19–32.
76 General discussion of dogs and wolves in the Fables at Mainoldi 1984:201–9.
77 Aesop 153 Perry. 78 Aesop 346 Perry. 79 Aesop 699 Perry.
80 Aesop 267 Perry. 81 Aesop 342 Perry. 82 Aesop 343 Perry
83 Aesop 701 Perry. The perceived similarity between wolves and dogs justifies the inclusion of the
brief Appendix B on the ancient world’s Cynocephali, ‘Dog-heads’.
84 The verb is built on the intermediate noun lyssa, ‘wolf-madness’, <*lyki̯a. See above all
Chantraine 2009 and Beekes 2010 s.v. λύσσα (the latter even going so far as to suggest that lyssa origin
ally signified ‘she-wolf ’ in itself); cf. also Latouche 1875:30, Lincoln 1975, Mainoldi 1984:175–6,
Marcinkowski 2001:20 n.97.
76 The Werewolf in the Ancient World
the entity is seemingly killed within the tale, but some contextual details in the
beggar’s description point strongly to this: the description ‘He was dressed in rags
and had a squalid (auchmērōs) face’85 is suitable enough for a beggar, but it is
particularly appropriate also to the traditional representation of ghosts. The
She was only semi-clothed, with a pitiful piece of patchwork. Her feet were bare
and uncovered. She was yellow like boxwood and foully emaciated. Her unkempt
hair was partially grey and caked in the ashes that had been scattered over it. It
hung down and covered most of her face.
Apuleius Metamorphoses 9.30
Before this, in Euripides’ Orestes, when Orestes had declared himself metaphoric
ally dead, Menelaus had told him, ‘Your squalid (auchmēros) hair has gone wild,
wretched one.’87 Clothing of rags, foul face, and unkempt hair are clearly standard
topoi for ghost descriptions.
The term phasma, applied to the creature, may also of course specifically desig-
nate a ‘ghost’. And there are a great many instances in Greek literature where this
is plainly and simply the case: it is used for, inter alia, the ghost of Orpheus’ wife
Eurydice in the underworld, the ghosts that occupy haunted houses, and the
ghosts of the vengeful dead and the sex-starved.88 But the word admittedly has a
broad and complex semantic field. The long-standing need for a detailed study of
it has at last been addressed by Flaminia Beneventano della Corte in a University
of Siena thesis. The term is a nomen rei actae derived from the verb phainō and so
can designate anything that has been shown. Generally speaking, it can designate
89 Beneventano della Corte 2017 passim. Fiery weapons and phalluses: e.g. Plutarch Romulus 2.4–7;
Dionysius of Halicarnassus 4.2.1–2, 5.46.1–3. Beneventano della Corte also examines phasmata as
facilitators of communication between this realm and other realms. Their role in this regard is help-
fully crystallized in the distinction between phasma and deigma (the nomen rei actae derived from
deiknumi, also ‘show’): a phasma opens up a question or a possibility; a deigma determines or con-
firms the answer.
90 Philostratus Apollonius 1.4. 91 Philostratus Apollonius 6.27.
92 Philostratus Apollonius 4.25. 93 Philostratus Apollonius 2.4.
94 Philostratus Apollonius 3.20. 95 Philostratus Heroicus 45.2
96 Philostratus Heroicus 2.4.
78 The Werewolf in the Ancient World
Later Comparanda
Readers from the Balkans may find much of the preceding material in this chapter
quaint, the association between werewolves and the dead being self-evident, given
that for them the werewolf has effectively morphed into or merged into the vam-
pire. The terms generally in use for the demonic dead—‘vampires’—in the Balkans,
including the Serbo-Croat vukodlak and the Greek vrikolakas, the latter well
known from folklore, are thought to derive from the reconstructed Slavic term
*vьlk, ‘wolf ’, and the South Slavic term dlaka, ‘fleece’. The vrikolakas will still occa-
sionally turn into a wolf, though on the whole his lupine qualities have dissipated,
apart, of course, from his fundamental craving for human blood.100
This relationship between the werewolf and the vampire is saluted in Bram
Stoker’s Dracula, for which our own Sabine Baring-Gould’s 1865 The Book of
Werewolves was an important source.101 Dracula escapes from the wreck of the
schooner Demeter at Whitby in a form initially identified as that of great dog;102
101 The notes Stoker took from Baring-Gould are reproduced in facsimile at Eighteen-Bisang and
Miller 2013:128–31; cf. 284.
102 Ch. 8, Cutting from The Dailygraph, 8 August. In Stoker’s notes for the novel, Dracula had been
projected to appear at Whitby first as a man, then as a wolf, and then as a flying creature of some sort:
Eighteen-Bisang and Miller 2013:142.
103 Ch. 18, Mina Harker’s Journal, 30 Sept.; ch. 26, MH’s Memorandum, 30.
104 Ch.1, Jonathan Harker’s Journal, 5 May; ch. 3, JH’s Journal, 8, 16 May.
105 Ch. 2, JH’s Journal, 5 May; the line is faithfully and famously reproduced by Bela Lugosi in the
1931 Universal Dracula.
106 Ch, 4, JH’s Journal, 24 June. 107 Ch. 4, JH’s Journal, 29 June.
108 Ch. 11, The Pall Mall Gazette, 18 Sept., Memorandum left by Lucy Westenra, 17 Sept. Stoker
evidently found the name ‘Berserker’ appropriate for a wolf after perusing Baring-Gould 1865:34–42;
cf. Eighteen-Bisang and Miller 2013:128–9.
109 Ch. 27, MH’s Journal, 6 Nov.; cf., further, ch. 15, Note left by Van Helsing, 27 Sept.; ch. 18, MH’s
Journal, 30 Sept.; ch. 19, JH’s Journal, 1 Oct.
110 Stoker 1914. The status of this literary fragment is no longer in doubt: Eighteen-Bisang and
Miller 2013:278–80.
111 Ch. 2, JH’s Journal, 8 May; ch. 3, JH’s Journal, 16 May; ch. 4, JH’s Journal, 28 May, 30 June.
80 The Werewolf in the Ancient World
a wolf ’, and that it has disappeared amongst the tombs; their bullets have no effect
on the creature, since they are not ‘sacred’ ones. We are left to infer that the wolf
was none other than Dracula himself in lupine form, protecting his important
guest from his lesser rivals.112
Conclusion
This chapter has traced the persistent association between werewolves, ghosts,
and the dead in the ancient world. There is a weak basis for thinking that a gen-
eral association obtained between wolves tout court and the dead in the Greek
world, but a stronger one for thinking that such an association did indeed obtain
in the Italian world, given that the Etruscan reflex of Hades, Aita/Calu, could
sport a wolfskin, and that wolves come to serve as the emissaries of Dis in the
aetiological myth of the Hirpi Sorani. As to werewolves proper, Herodotus’ appli-
cation of the word goētes to his werewolf Neuri, in addition to saluting their abil-
ity to transmute their form, probably also implies that they engaged in ghost or
soul manipulation. Virgil’s werewolf Moeris is a raiser of ghosts. Petronius’ were-
wolf story is richly decked out with the imagery of ghosts and the underworld.
Marcellus of Side’s medical ‘lycanthropes’, sufferers from the disease of ‘lycan-
thropy’, roll around in graveyards, and indeed it would appear to be on the basis
of this symptom in particular that the victims of the disease are considered to be
werewolves: their projection as such is essentially metaphorical, and they should
not be seen as the origin point or the key to ancient werewolfism. Pausanias’ Hero
of Temesa is a ghost or a revenant dressed in a wolfskin, while Philostratus’
112 The episode in a sense duplicates those of the novel in which Dracula warns his three brides to
stay away from Harker: ch. 3, JH’s Journal, May 16; ch. 4, JH’s Journal, 29 June.
113 O’Donnell 1912:97–103; Summers 1933:189–91, Frost 1973:31; Rini 1929:83 notes the Italian
superstition that those born on Christmas night become werewolves.
114 Discussed, with references, in Chapter 4.
Werewolves, Ghosts, and the Dead 81