Law and Social Transformation Project
Law and Social Transformation Project
Roll no: 54
2. History
Education in India
3, Education in india
4. Role of education
5 Initiative
6 ETE
7 Conclusion
8 Judgment
9. Suggestion
‘
Children and Education
Introduction
From the words of Jawaharlal Nehru, children are like buds in the garden that need
to be carefully nurtured, as they are the future citizens of tomorrow. Education acts
as the wind beneath the wings for children to grow as healthy and prosperous adults
in the future.
Education plays a pivotal role in a child’s life as it helps them to think and analyze
critically, enhance their imagination and thought processes. This platform exposes
them to new ideas and helps them achieve success through their dream careers.
A child plays a vital role as they unfold the door to the success of a nation, and
education plays a significant role to unlock the success of a child. A nation achieves
its growth and success only when a child succeeds
Education is highly essential in a child’s life and lays the foundation of his/her
adulthood success later in life. It acts as a tool that decides whether the individual
was contented or happy as an adult or turns out as a depressed and emotionally
devastated individual.
Did you know that nearly 70 Million children across the world lack the opportunity to
visit the school? Nearly 32 Million children residing in African countries alone lack the
opportunity to visit the school.
India has imposed the Right To Education Act 2009, to make Education mandatory
for children between the age of 6 to 14 years and thus leading India to grow as one
of the fastest-growing economies in the world.
Traditionally, only the highest caste – the Brahims – were taught to read and
write. To say it more precise: the traditional Hindu education served only the needs
of boys who belong to Brahim families. Education was similarly elitist under the
Moguls who favored the rich rather than those from high-caste backgrounds. Under
the British colonial rule these elitist tendencies were even reinforced (Lall/House,
2005, p. 2). In the year 1600 The East India Company came to India mainly to
explore business possibilities but it also thought to establish its own empire in the
country. While the supremacy of the British in India increased with the establishment
of East India Company, education in general was neglected (Singh, 2007, p. 56).
British era
In 1854 a charter was issued by Charles Wood who was then the Chairman of the
Board of control of the Company. Thus, the charter is known as Wood’s Despatch of
1854 as he was the main architect of it (Pathak, 2007, p. 45). This despatch helped
to provide education a definite structure, base and shape. The Wood’s
Despatch defined educational policy in India as the diffusion of European knowledge
(Singh, 2007, p. 86). It is said that the Wood’s Despatch laid the foundation of the
present system of education in India (Sing, 2007, p. 90). Due to the despatch
education had a structure with indigenous schools and primary schools at the base
and universities at the top. Further, departments were installed in each province to
look after the state of education and it recommended the foundation of graded
schools (Indigenous Primary schools, Middle schools, High schools, Colleges and
Universities). The despatch introduced a system of grant-in-aid and therewith sought
the cooperation of private corporations in the field of education (Singh, 2007, p. 90).
Further it made recommendations for the expansion of general women’s education
and vocational education and to establish two universities of Calcutta and Bombay
(Pathak, 2007, p. 46f). Wood’s recommendation to make the mother tongue the
medium of instruction was not followed and English was made the medium of
instruction and got firmly established throughout the country. However, the main
contribution of the Wood’s Despatch was the formation of a system of education
from primary school to University. Since then, serious efforts were made by the
Government to promote education at all levels but the journey for the government to
establish a system that was able to satisfy every section of the society was neither
simple nor smooth (Reddy, 2010, p. 1). Due to dissatisfaction of the people that
started surfacing when the outcomes of educational measures undertaken by the
government did not seem to match their expectation, several measures for
educational reconstruction followed. Some landmark developments in the history of
modern Indian education were made during the pre-independence period which
cannot be explained further in this paper.
The prevalent educational system in India is a legacy of British education with some
influence of North-American tradition of higher education and a few indigenous
innovations to respond to socio-cultural needs of the contemporary society
(Achuthan/Agrawal et al, 1993, p. 20). When becoming independent in 1947, India
inherited an educational system with great educational disparities between men and
women, upper and lower classes and urban and rural populations. In a badly
battered and shattered nation full of historical disparities among various regions and
communities, education was seen as a vehicle to bring about justice, liberty, equality
and fraternity among the populace of a multilingual, multireligious and multiethnic
country (Achutan/Agrawal et al, 1993, p. 21). The first mile stone in the development
of education in independent India was the enactment of the Indian Constitution in
1950 which laid down broad educational policies for the country (Biswas/Agrawal,
1994, p. 655). In innumerable conferences, committees and commissions,
educationists, State Ministers of education and other educational experts were called
to discuss the problems of education and offer programs for reconstruction of
education in independent India (Biswas/Agrawal, 1994, p. 655). One of the most
important policy statements was the policy statement of 1968 which was a sequel of
the Report of the Education Commission (1964-1966), popularly called Dr. D. S.
Kothari Commission. The Kothari Commission was built to formulate a coherent
education policy for India and according to the commission, education was intended
to increase productivity, develop social and national unity, consolidate democracy,
modernize the country and develop social, moral and spiritual values (Lall/House,
2005, p. 2). To achieve this aims, the main pillar of the Indian education policy was
free and compulsory education for all children up to the age of 14. Other features
included the development of languages, the equality of educational opportunities and
the development and prioritization of scientific education and research (Lall/House,
2005, p. 3). In 1986, Prime Minister Rajiv Ghandi announced a new education policy:
the National Policy on Education (NPE). It laid stress on the need for radical
reconstructions of the education system in general, to improve its overall quality and
gave great attention to science and technology (Kumar, 2004, p. 54). Even though
the central government declared with the policy of 1986 that it would accept a wider
responsibility to enforce a national and integrative character of education, the states
retained a significant role, particularly in relation to the curriculum. The key legacies
of the 1986 policy were the promotion of privatization and an emphasis on
secularism and science. Another consequence of the NPE was that the quality of
education was seen as a problem and thus, several initiatives have been developed
to counter these problems (Lall/House, 2005, p. 3). As a result of these initiatives
changes are being made on the ground. A massive infrastructure development and a
teacher recruitment drive were initiated nationally. The NPE not only focused on
improvements to school environments but also to instructional material and teacher
training (Create, 2009, p. 2). Various government schemes target disadvantaged
children such as the Alternative, Innovative and Education Guarantee Scheme which
provides education in smaller, isolated habitations in rural areas or urban slums and
schooling to difficult-to-reach groups such as working and migrating children. A mid-
day meal scheme was introduced which aims to provide a cooked mid-day meal to
all children attending primary school. Additionally, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan (SSA) is a
program which aims to achieve universal elementary education of satisfactory quality
by the year 2010 (Create, 2009, p. 2). The Indian government is preparing the
universalization of secondary education (USE) with the main aim to provide high
quality secondary education to all Indian adolescents up to the age of 16 by 2015
and senior secondary education up to the age of 18 by 2020 (Nordic, 2006, p. 5).
After Independence in 1947, governments have tried to address the limitations of the
Indian education system in the framework of its Constitution, and have introduced
various policies and programs for widening the access to education, for enhancing
the overall quality of education and to promote literacy throughout the country
(Sinha, 2006, p. 105). Although the Indian education system has improved
considerably since independence it still is facing manifold problems. Before
presenting and discussing these problems it is important to gain insight into the
structure of the present day education system in India.
Education in India
Education in India means the process of teaching, learning, and training of human
capital in schools and colleges. This improves and increases knowledge and results in
skill development hence enhancing the quality of the human capital. Our government
has always valued the importance of education in India and this is reflected in our
economic policies.
As the expansion of school education is going on, we need more trained teachers who
have studied at educational institutes. Therefore, expenditure on all levels of education
should increase. Himachal Pradesh spends Rs. 2005 as per capita education
expenditure as compared to Bihar which spends Rs. 515. This results in differences of
educational opportunities between states.
The Tapas Majumdar Committee was appointed by the government of India in the year
1998. The committee estimated an expenditure of Rs. 1.37 Lakh crore (approx) for
1998-99 to 2006-07, to cater all Indian children of 6-14 years age group, under the
umbrella of school education.
“We believe that India should strive to bring science and the values of the spirit
together in harmony and thereby pave their way for the eventual emergence of a
society which would cater to the needs of the man as a whole and not only to a
particular fragment of his personality”
From this statement we can gather that what we want from education is for scientific
outlook must become a part of how we live and our culture.
Following steps are needed for improving secular outlook of citizens of this country
National unity and emotional integration are two factors that are important when
addressing the success and stability of any country. When it comes to about
question of national integration education plays an important role. Education aims to
do more than support students individually. The aim of a person’s education is to
develop socially successful and productive individuals.
Education achieves these aims through stressing on following points
The phrase “socialist pattern of society”, according to the Planning Commission (see
this reference), means “that the basic criterion for determining the lines of advance
must not be private profit but social gain, and that the pattern of development and
the structure of socio-economic relations should be so planned that they result not
only in appreciable increases in national income and employment but also in greater
equality in incomes and wealth”.
The education system should provide for
Every child between the ages of 6 to 14 years has the right to free and compulsory
education. This is stated as per the 86th Constitution Amendment Act via Article
21A. The Right to Education Act seeks to give effect to this amendment
The government schools shall provide free education to all the children and the
schools will be managed by School Management Committees (SMC). Private
schools shall admit at least 25% of the children in their schools without any fee.
The main objective of the Act is to regulate and prevent the pre-natal sex
determination in order to prevent female foeticide.
This act with respect to children deals with person(s) who procure or attempt to
procure any child for prostitution or person(s) who are found with a child in a brothel
(it is presumed child has been detained for the purpose of prostitution) and punishes
them. It also provides for the due care of rescued children.
The Indian Penal Code by its various sections specifically protects children and their
rights. Some of these sections are:
These sections specifically protect the rights of children. Other sections applicable to
punish offenders for a crime can also be invoked to protect the children against such
offenders.
This act with the help of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2000 tries to ensure that no person
under the age of 21 years faces imprisonment.
It is the first written policy for the children in India. It aims at providing better
enforcement of constitutional rights of the children along with those granted by the
CRC. Some of the provisions include free education, comprehensive health and
nutritious plans, etc.
Convention on the Rights of Child, 1989:
Adopted by the United Nations in 1989, the CRC is an international agreement
legally binding on the parties signatory to it. It has incorporated in its various articles
rights of children without any discrimination whatsoever. It was ratified by India on 11
December 1992. It has a preamble setting out different principles the CRC is built
upon.
1. Non-discrimination (Article 2)
2. Best Interest of the Child (Article 3)
3. Right to Life Survival and Development (Article 6)
4. Right to be Heard (Article 12)
1. PART I (Article 1-41): It sets out the rights of children and obligations of
governments. The rights can further be categorised as:
o Survival Rights: the right to life of child and access to basic
necessities to existence such as adequate food, shelter, standard
of living and medical requirements.
o Development Rights: the right to education, to practice the
religion of own choice and cultural activities, freedom of thought
and conscience, to play and leisure and to access to information.
o Protection Rights: rights that protect children from abuses
which may be consequential to several kinds of circumstances,
such as children subject to procedures of criminal justice system,
children in employment, children who are refugees, children who
have undergone abuse or exploitation.
o Participation Rights: rights of children to participate in activities
of the society, especially matters that may affect their life, to
assemble peacefully and to join associations.
Three Optional Protocols to the CRC have been introduced which are:
The act aims at eradicating the bonded labour system in India which
exploits the weaker sections of society, especially children.
This is the second National Health Policy, after the first in 1983. The policy
provides for Universal Immunization Programmes, health care related
education in schools and free regular health check-ups at schools etc.
The first and foremost step to be taken for a child in distress is giving moral
support to him or her. It is essential for children to be supported and
brought back into their comfort zone if they have been subjected to abuse.
Police may be contacted on their hotline number, i.e., 100 for immediate
assistance. Thereafter, a complaint can be made with the Police by lodging
a FIR at the nearest Police Station.
The Police, upon lodging of the FIR, starts the investigation if such
cognizable offence as reported was committed under the jurisdiction of the
Police Station where FIR was lodged.
If the cognizable offence was not committed under the jurisdiction of the
said Police Station, the police shall register a zero FIR and send it to the
Police Station having jurisdiction over the matters of the place where the
offence was committed. The Police Station with appropriate jurisdiction
commences the investigation.
Photographs or video clips or voice recordings of the child abuse may be
taken as evidence and shared with Police in order to strengthen the case
against the accused. Such kind of evidence shall not be circulated,
transmitted or made available to anyone except the authorities or the court
(for the purpose of proof) in cases relating to sexual offences against the
children and identity of the victim shall not be disclosed to the public or
unauthorised people.
If it so happens the police station refuses to lodge an FIR or to record any
information, a copy of such information shall be sent to the Superintendent
of the Police or the Assistant Commissioner of Police in writing, along with
the statement that the approached Police Station refused to lodge the FIR
or record the information in question. A copy of the writing must also be
sent to the Commissioner of Police, the Deputy Commissioner of Police
and the Senior Police Inspector.
Alternatively, ChildLine can be approached by dialling 1098 to report any
child abuse and seek assistance. ChildLine India Foundation is the nodal
agency of the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development acting as
the parent organisation for setting up, managing and monitoring the
CHILDLINE 1098 service all over the country. It is toll-free and 24 hours
accessible number.
Various NGOs are working for the protection of rights of children; their help
may be taken to secure the rights of children or to bring to justice the
offenders who infringe such rights. Some of the reputed NGOs working for
the welfare of children are HAQCRC, Cry, etc.
After official reporting of abuse and lodging of FIR, the matter goes to
competent court and case is initiated by the State against the accused.
)Parts III and IV of the Constitution are supplementary to each other. Unless the
'right to education' mentioned in Article 41 is made a reality, the fundamental rights in Part
III will remain beyond the reach of the illiterate majority,
(e)Article 21 has been interpreted by this Court to include the right to live with human
dignity and all that goes along with it. "The 'right to education' flows directly from right to
life.' In other words, 'right to education' is concomitant to the fundamental right enshrined
in Part III of the Constitution. The State is under a constitutional mandate to
provide educational institutions at all levels for the benefit of citizens." The benefit
of education cannot be confined to either classes.
The said fact has also been affirmed by eminent educationists of modern India like Dr.
Radhakrishnan, J.P. Naik, Dr. Kothari and others.
44.It is argued by some of the counsel for the petitioners that Article 21 is negative an
character and that it merely declares that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal
liberty except according to the procedure established by law. Since the State is not depriving
the respondents-students of their right to education, Article 21 is not attracted, it is
submitted. If and when the State makes a law taking away the right to education,
would Article 21 be attracted, according to them. This argument, in our opinion, is really
born of confusion; at any rate, it is designed to confuse the issue. The first question is
whether the right to life guaranteed by Article 21 does take in the right to education or not.
It is then that the second question arises whether the State is taking away that right. The
mere, fact that the State is not taking away the right as at present does not mean
that right to education is not included within the right to life. The content of the right is not
determined by perception of threat. The content of right to life is not to be determined on the
basis of existence or absence of threat of deprivation. The effect of holding
that right to education is implicit in the right to fife is that the State cannot deprive the
citizen of his right to education except in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law.
45.In the above state of law, it would not be correct to contend that Mohini Jain was wrong in
so far as it declared that "the right to education flows directly from right to life.' But the
question is what is the content of this right? How much and what level of education is
necessary to make the life meaningful? Does it mean that every citizen of this country can
call upon the State to provide him education of his choice? In other words, whether the
citizens of this country can demand that the State provide adequate number of medical
colleges, engineering colleges and other educational institutions to satisfy all
their educational needs? Mohini Jain seems to say, yes. With respect, we cannot agree with
such a broad proposition. The right to education which is implicit in the right to fife and
personal liberty guarenteed by Article 21 must be construed in the fight of the directive
principles in Part IV of the Constitution So far as the right to education is concerned, there
are several articles in Part IV which expressly speak of it. Article 41 says that the "State shall
within the limits of its economic capacity and development make effective provision for
securing the right to work, to education and to public assistance in cases of unemployment,
old age, sickness and disablement, and in other cases of underserved want.' Article 45 says
that "the State shau endeavour to provide, within a period of ten years from the
commencement of this Constitution, for free and compulsory education for all children until
they complete the age of fourteen years.' Article 46 commands that 'the State shall promote
with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the
people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect
them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation." Education means knowledge and
Knowledge itself is power.' As rightly observed by Johan Adams, 'the preservation of means
of knowledge among the lowest ranks is of more importance to the public than all the
property of all the rich men in the country" (Dissertation on canon and fuedal law, 1765). It is
this concern which seems to underlie Article 46. It is the tyrants and bad rulers who are afraid
of spread of education and knowledge among the deprived classes. Witness Hitler railing
against universal education. He said: 'Universal education is the most corroding and
disintegrating poison that liberalism has ever invented for its own destruction.' (Rauschning,
The voice of destruction: Hider speaks). A true democracy is one where education is
universal where people understand what Is good for them and nation and know how to
govern themselves. The three articles 45, 46 and 41 are designed to achieve the said goal
among others. It is in the light of these articles that the content and parameters of
the right to education have to be determined. Right to education understood in the context
of Articles 45 and 41, means. (a) every child/citizen of this country has a right to
free education until he completes the age of fourteen years and (b) after a child/citizen
completes 14years, his right to education is circumscribed by the limits of the economic
capacity of the State and its development We may deal with both these limbs
separately. Right to free education for all children until they complete the age of fourteen
years (45-A). It is noteworthy that among the several articles in part IV, only Article
45 speaks of a time-limit; no other article does. Has it no significance? Is it a mere pious
wish, even after 44 years of the Constitution? Can the State flout the said direction even after
44 years on the ground that the article merely calls upon it to "endeavour to provide" the
same and on the further ground that the said article is not enforceable by virtue of the
declaration in Article 37. Does not the passage of 44 years more than four times the period
stipulated in Article 45 convert the obligation created by the article into an enforceable right?
In this context, we feel constrained to say that allocation of available funds to different
sectors of education in India discloses an inversion of priorities indicated by the
Constitution. The Constitution contemplated a crash programme being undertaken by the
State to achieve the goal set out in Article 45. It is relevant to notice that Article 45 does not
speak of the limits of its economic capacity and development' as does Article 41, which inter
alia speaks of right to education. What has actually happened is more money is spent and
more attention is directed to higher education that to and at the cost of primary education.
(By primary education, we mean the education, which a normal child receives by the time
he completes 14 years of age). Neglected more so are the rural sectors, and the weaker
sections of the society referred to in Article 46. We clarify, we are not seeking to lay down
the priorities for the government we are only amphasising the constitutional policy as
disclosed by Articles 45, 46 and 41. Surely the wisdom of these constitutional provisions is
beyond question. This inversion of priorities has been commended upon adversely by both
the educationists and economists. Gunnar Myrdal the noted economist and sociologist, a
recognised authority on South Asia, in his book "Asian Drama" (abridged Edition published
in 1972) makes these perceptive observations at page 335:
PART V
80. For the above reasons the Writ Petitions and Civil Appeals except (W.P. (C) 855/92, C.A.
3573/92 and the Civil Appeals arising from S.L.Ps. 13913 and 13940/92) are disposed of in
the following terms:
1. The citizens of this country have a fundamental right to education. The said right flows
from Article 21. This right is, however, not an absolute right. Its content and para meters
have to be determined in the light of Articles 45 and 41. In other words every child/citizen of
this country has a right to free education until he completes the age of fourteen years.
Thereafter his right to education is subject to the limits of economic capacity and
development of the State.
2. Vinay N. Pandya vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 4
October, 2005
The learned Counsel submitted that in view of these constitutional provisions and in
view of the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, right to education is
fundamental right or is a occupation, and therefore, students who are at the age
from 6 to 14 have a fundamental right to education under Article 21A of the
Constitution of India and also those students have also a right to education/right to
occupation of education among all students and in support of the same. Mr. Girish
R. Patel, learned Advocate has relied upon following decisions of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court.
The learned author has thereafter, considered the right to education with reference
to Part IV-Directive Principle of State Policy and Articles 21 and 14 as well
as right to education and rights under Articles 19, 21, 26, 29 and 30 and
also right to education and right to equality. After considering the same, the
learned author has considered and summed up the decision at page 312 which is as
under :
"In sum, the increased focus on the phenomenon of knowledge based work and its
emergent socio-economic and cultural dimensions have put the knowledge
dissemination process at the centre of interactions of several rights and freedoms,
making them more meaningful and in turn reinforcing educational right. (Re. - Book
of P. Ishwara Bhat, page 312).
In this matter, I have referred to the provisions of Primary Education and also
provisions of Central Board Regulations. Over and above, I have also
considered Article 21A viz., fundamental right to education and also judgments in
the case of Mohini Jain (supra) and in the case of Unni Krishnan (supra). It may be
noted that in this judgments, I have referred to important Paras of the judgments.
However, with a view to see that the judgment may not, be unnecessarily burdened,
I have only referred certain Paras which also deal with the right to education. I have
also considered the judgments in the case of T.M.A. Pai Foundation, Modern School
and also in the case of P.R. Inamdar. In these also, important paras I have quoted,
but other Paras I have referred. The Committee will consider the same. I have also
shortly stated what about the education, the Committee will consider that aspect
also. In this behalf, I hope and trust that Committee will consider the same in true
letter and spirit with an idea that the educational institute is entitled to charge
reasonable fees in future, but nonetheless in charging fees, there should not be a
commercialisation of education. This twin aspect will be considered by the
Committee and other principles laid down in this behalf. The Committee will give
report in two months from the commencement of working. It will be open for the
Committee to look after the Parent-Students Association, representatives of
management of school. The Committee shall look into questions relating to the
process fee being charged by the school on account of development fee, uniform
fees, books and stationery etc.
Suggestion
The Government should increase the funding for education to 6 percent of GDP as in
NEP 2020. As part of their CSR activities, the private sector can play a key role in
developing schooling infrastructure, particularly in rural areas.
Reference
3. https://ecpat.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ENG-Briefing-
Paper_Sexual-Exploitation-of-Children-in-
India_FINAL_30November2021.pdf
4. https://acadpubl.eu/hub/2018-120-5/4/358.pdf