8D-CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT(Reduction of repeated child part quality issues)

FRM/QA/12,Rev.0.
Date : 01.01.2021

Complaint Date : 24-03-2024 Part Name: 40mm Ac metal top 8D Report Number : 01

Product Name: ALUMINIUM

Customerr Name : Pcorp Capacitor Pvt. Ltd Part Number :
TOP- 40MM.

D1. Defining the problem FMEA No: Occurance Rating at Present Revised :
D2. Team Details D3. Description of Segregation or Containment / Immediate short term action- D3. Assignment Sheet To Start Analysis [4]
RPN Before / After : Defect Prevention control / Detection is effective in assembly process Yes / No :

OK Qty. Ok Qty Segrigation Done Done on

PRICOL VIEW (5W2H) Supplier View Name Function Location Responsibility Checked Qty. Rejection. Qty Identification mark Activities Responsible Date Status
(As it is) (After rework) By Date

Team
Leader : Customer end NIL Pricol Plan: 25.3.24 Done
What is the difference between a
What is the problem? [14] Mismatch bush observed in 40mm. (4+4) The good part not leakge MAN POWER TRAINING. Swapnil
good and a bad part? [21]
Team Members : In Transit NIL Actual: 25.3.24 Done

FPS
Was the part produced in the
Why is it a problem? [15] Bush was not asper specification standard process (no rework or Yes Part produced in standard process 1 Sahebrao Aher Plant Head
deviations)? [22]
WIP … … NIL … … … …

Inward Stores Stock … … NIL … … … … … Plan:

When was it manufactured at 2 Swapnil Shinde QA Head
When was it detected [16] 24-03-2024 3/4/2024
Supplier end (Date/Time)? [24]
Short term Action taken in detail Responsibility Target Actual:

MAN POWER TRAINING. QA 3/25/2024 Plan:

Do we detect the problem with our 3 GANESH / POORNIMA/PRADHYUM Production Head
Where was it detected? [17] CUSTOMER ENDS
equipment? [25]
Actual:

In which other application or Plan:

Who detected it? [18] 4 VIJAY RIKAME. / VISHAL Materials Head
CUSTOMER PRPDUCTION. processes is this product used?
[26] Actual:

Did we have the same problem on 5

How was it detected? [19] Checking No this is happened first time Plan:
similar parts (recurrence)? [27]

In case of recurrence what was the

How many bad parts? [20] 2 nos. countermeasure in the last claim No previous complaint 6 Actual:
[28]

D4.1 FISHBONE DIAGRAM FOR DEFECT (Occurrence ) : D4.2 FISHBONE DIAGRAM FOR DEFECT (Non Detection ) :

Material
Man Machine
Material
Man Machine

Visual Inspector was new and

unskilled to rectify the issue.

Mismatch bush
observed in 40mm. .
(4+4)

Measurement Method
Measurement Method Environment
Environment

D4. 3 Cause verification/ Validation For :Occurrence Observation Date : D4.5 WHY-WHY ANALYSIS FOR OCCURRENCE: Date : 08.10.2018 D6.1 EFFECTIVENESS MONITORING: (Determine the intervals for Effetciveness monitoring based on manufacturing / Despatch schedules)

Evaluation Measurement Monitor Effectiveness of

Not ok Non-Significant
Sr. No. Possible Causes Specification OK (parts /process) Sr. No. Significant Cause WHY 1 WHY 2 WHY 3 WHY 4 WHY 5 both Process control Duration Total
Technique (parts / process) /Significant parameter / Result

Similar bush on both the There should be

Dissimilar bush was Two dissimilar bush
1 Man terminals as per Visual similar bush on both
used
Significant 1 Man
requirements the terminals. used

2 ………. 2

3 ………. ………. ………. 3

4 ………. ………. ………. 4 D7 Corrective Action Planned In Similar Parts/Processes/Other Plants ( HORIZONTAL DEPLOYMENT )

5 Action Comp.
5 ………. ………. ………. Detail Action Plan Date
Date.

6 WHY-WHY ANALYSIS FOR NON DETECTION : Similar Parts / Process Responsible Departmental Head provided the training to all the testing operators about Visual Inspection. 3/25/2024 3/25/2024

7 1 Similar Parts / Process

8 2 Similar Parts / Process

9 3 D8.1 Standardization : Do any of the following require action ?

Existing Revised Doc.

4 Doc. Affected
10 Sr. No. Description Target Date Date & Rev. Date & Rev. Enclosed Remarks
Yes / No
No No Yes / No

D4. 4 Cause verification / Validation for : Non- Detection Observation Date : D5.1 PERMANENT COUNTER MEASURE : 1 ECRN / PCRN

Evaluation Measurement Not ok Non-Significant Approved

Sr. No. Possible Causes Specification OK (parts /process) Sr. No. Corrective Action for Occurrence Action By Target Date Comp. On 2 Product /Part Drawing
Technique (parts / process) /Significant BY

MAN POWER
1 1 CEO QA/ PROD 3/25/2024 3/25/2024 3 Process Flow Diagram / OPC
TRAINING REQ.

SOP TO BE
2 2 CEO QA / PROD 3/25/2024 3/25/2024 4 PFMEA /DFMEA
IMPLEMENTED

3 …….. ………… ……….. 3 SKILL MATRIX CEO QA/ PROD 3/25/2024 3/25/2024 5 Control plan - Cover scavenge

4 …….. ………… ……….. 4 6 WSS / WI

5 ……….. 5 7 Startup checksheet

Approved
6 Sr. No. Corrective Action for Non Detection Action By Target Date Comp. On 8 Set-up Approval & First Piece Approval Report
BY

7 1 9 Drawing (tooling / FIXTURES /gauges)

8 2 10 Jigs & Fixture Calibration

11 Poka-yoke Checksheet

Complaint open date : 24-03-2024 No. of Days to close : 3 DAY 12 Dock Audit Plan / Report

Complaint close date : 27-03-2024 13 Skill Matrix

Technical Review : 14 Maintaninance Check sheet

Verified By : QA./ PRODUCTION. Approved BY: CEO 15 GII Checksheet / PDIR

16 Others if any , COLOUR COADING