L14 (2)
L14 (2)
where the limit is taken over any sequence of closed surfaces containing P
whose volumes tend to 0.
How do we calculate div F?
Answer:The calculation depends upon the coordinate system.In rectangular
coordinates,
∂F1 ∂F2 ∂F3
div F(P) = (P) + (P) + (P).
∂x ∂y ∂z
Note that the integral on the right is a standard triple integral of a scalar
function over a solid in R3 , while the integral on the left is a surface integral of
the the vector field F(x, y, z).
= 4πR 3 .
1
In this example, suppose we take F0 = R
· F instead of F.
Then F0 = n on the sphere. Thus F0 · n = 1 on S.
Then F · n dS = dS = surface area(S).
RR RR
S 0 S
x 2z 2 + y 2x 2 + z 2y 2
Z Z
= dS,
S R
Which is doable, but not pleasant.
Better: Use the Divergence Theorem.
Z Z Z Z Z Z
div F dV = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 dV
w w
Z 2π Z π Z R
= ρ2 · ρ2 sin(φ) dρdφdθ
0 0 0
Z πZ R
= 2π ρ4 sin(φ) dρdφ
0 0
2 π
Z
= πR 5 sin(φ) dφ
5 0
4
= πR 5 .
5
2 2
Example C. Calculate F · dS for F = yz 3 i + e x +z j + cos( x 2 + y 2 )k and
RR p
S
S torus obtained by revolving the circle (y − 3)2 + z 2 = 4 in the yz-plane about
the y-axis,
i i
Something interesting happens when we sum the terms belonging to the right
hand side of Step 4.
the components over S0 cancel and the sum becomes F · n dS, where S̃ is
RR
S̃
the combined outer shell of S1 and S2 .
Thus, the sum of the terms in the RHS in Step 4 approximates F · dS, and
RR
S
equals it in the limit.
April 24: The Divergence Theorem
Examples of the Divergence Theorem
Gauss’ Law (Physics Version). The net electric flux through any hypothetical
closed surface is equal to 1 0 times the net electric charge within that closed
surface, where 0 is the electric constant.
Gauss’ Law (Math Version). Let M be a solid in R3 with a smooth boundary
∂M.Assumep(0,0,0) is not on the boundary ∂M. Set r = xi + yj + zk, and
r = ||r|| = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 . Then:
1 4π, if (0, 0, 0) ∈ M
Z Z (
( 3 r) · n dS = .
∂M r 0, if (0, 0, 0) 6∈ M
In the second case, the vector field r13 r is defined throughout M, so that if we
show its divergence is zero, then by the Divergence Theorem,
1
Z Z
( 3 r) · n dS = 0.
∂M r
1 x
The i component of r3
r is 3 . DIfferentiating with respect to x we get:
(x 2 +y 2 +z 2 ) 2
3 1
(x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) 2 − x · 32 (x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) 2 (2x)
=
(x 2 + y 2 + z 2 )3
1 (x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) − 3x 2
(x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) 2 · =
(x 2 + y 2 + z 2 )3
−2x 2 + y 2 + z 2
5 .
(x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) 2
Similarly, the corresponding partials of the j and k components are:
x 2 − 2y 2 + z 2 x 2 + y 2 − 2z 2
5 and 5 .
(x 2 + y2 + z 2) 2 (x 2 + y 2 + z 2 ) 2
1 1
Z Z Z Z
r · n dS = − r · n dS.
∂M r3 ∂N r
3
Note that the outward normal for ∂N as part of the boundary of W is the
inward normal for N. Thus,
1 1
Z Z Z Z
r · n dS = r · n dS,
∂M r ∂N r
3 3
Final Comment: If we use the symbol ∂W to denote the boundary of the solid
in the Divergence Theorem, and the ∇ · F for div F, then the Divergence
Theorem becomes:
Z Z Z Z Z
F · dS = ∇ · F dV .
∂W w
Note how the differential operator on the domain of integration on the left
hand side of the equation, moves up to the integrand on the right hand side of
the equation.