0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Writing - 2025 Formal Email Application (Summary)

Uploaded by

Tamara M
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Writing - 2025 Formal Email Application (Summary)

Uploaded by

Tamara M
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Departamento de Inglés

I.E.S. «Floridablanca»
Consejería de Educación

FORMAL EMAIL SCORING RUBRIC: APPICLATION (SUMMARY)


CONTENT RELEVANCE AND ORGANIZATION (15)
 CONTENT RELEVANCE (5)
- Full understanding of the specific content requirements of the writing prompt. 5
- Partial understanding of the specific content requirements of the writing prompt. 2.5
- Lack understanding of the specific content requirements of the writing prompt. 0
 RECIPIENT (R) to whom the email is sent
- The recipient has been indicated and the format is correct. 0.2
- The recipient has been indicated but the format is incorrect. 0.1
- The recipient has not been indicated. 0
 SENDER (S) who sends the email
- The sender has been indicated and the format is correct. 0.2
- The sender has been indicated but the format is incorrect. 0.1
- The sender has not been indicated. 0
 SUBJECT LINE (SL) 3-7 words: what the email is about
- It briefly and clearly summarizes the content of the email. 0.2
- Term “application” or professional/academic position not included. Incorrect information
0.1
format.
- It has not been included. 0
 GREETING (G) the formula to greet or “say hello”
- Correct level of formality: e.g. Dear Ms. or Mr. Spenser / Dear Hiring Manager 0.2
- Incorrect level of formality. 0.1
- Not included or misplaced. 0
 BODY (B) aims and details of the communication.
- Includes:
Section 1: (a) indication of what you are writing to apply or be admitted and where/how you
found out about it; (b) you understand what it involves and you have realistic expectations.
8
Section 2: explain your qualifications/experiences or your academic background.
Section 3: indicate your specific skills and abilities. *(this section could be included in section #2)
Section 4: explain why you are interested.
- Fails to do 4 of the following: (1) indicate what you are writing to; (2) name
company/institution; (3) where/how you found out it (4) Section 1.b (5) Section 2 (6) Section 4
3 (7) Section 4.
- Fails to include 5-7 aforementioned aspects. 2
 CLOSING (C) (2) ends with the communication with the R
- a) Thanking employer/academic authority for considering you.
b) Closing appropriate formula: e.g. “I look forward to hearing from you”. 1
c) Closing phrase: e.g. “Yours (faithfully)”, “Yours (sincerely)”
- 2 aforementioned elements are missing. 0.5
- There is no closing to the email. 0
 SIGNING OFF (SO) (1) senders name at the end of the email
- Appropriate format: (e.g., “Jane Smith”, not “Jane”). 0.2
- Only sender’s name or use of initials (e.g., “Jane”, not “J. Smith”). 0.1
- No signing off. 0

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Click here to download the full rubric from the University of Murcia website.
© Ángel Torres Rubio
Departamento de Inglés
I.E.S. «Floridablanca»
Consejería de Educación

USE OF ENGLISH (20)


 GRAMMAR (10)
- No “penalizable” errors. 10 - 7 - 9 “penalizable” errors. 4
- 1 – 3 “penalizable” errors. 8 - 10 - 12 “penalizable” errors. 2
- 4 – 6 “penalizable” errors. 6 - Text is full of grammatical errors. 0
 VOCABULARY (10)
- Wide variety of topic-related words/phrases (accurate, natural and not forced). 10
- Variety of topic-related words/phrases. Sometimes used inaccurately or seem overdone. 7.5
- Topic-related words/phrases not sufficiently developed. Vague word choice. Lacks variety. 5
- No topic-related words/phrases or used incorrectly. Limited word choice. 2.5
- The text is full of lexical errors and/or contains offensive language. 0

MECHANICS (5)
 SPELLING (3)
- No “penalizable” errors. 3 - 3 – 4 “penalizable” errors. 1
- 1 – 2 “penalizable” errors. 2 - 5 or more “penalizable” errors. 0
 PUNCTUATION (1)
- No errors. 1 - 3 – 4 errors. 0.5
- 1 – 2 errors. 0.75 - 5 or more errors. 0.25
 CAPITALIZATION (1)
- No errors. 1 - 3 – 4 errors. 0.5
- 1 – 2 errors. 0.75 - 5 or more errors. 0.25

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Click here to download the full rubric from the University of Murcia website.
© Ángel Torres Rubio

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy