Portfolio Assessment of Usman Baig

Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

1. Identification of a need or  Detailed analysis of problem and need clearly identified. 4 out of 5
opportunity with a brief  Descriptive design brief and reference to the user requirement is detailed.
analysis
leading to a design
 Good use of task analysis to explore different possibilities.
brief  Specific constraints clearly set up.
2. Research into the  Conclusive information gathered from research. 9 out of 10
design brief resulting in  Critical findings in mood board, product analysis, questionnaire, designer research
a specification
and client profile
 Detailed specification that is linked well with research.
3. Generation and  A wide range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing technique. 19 out of 20
exploration of design ideas  Comparative analysis of ideas carried out
 Use of descriptive annotations in developed ideas.
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.
4. Development of  Very good development of proposed solution, with appropriate design modifications 14 out of 15
proposed solution and reasoned decision-making on materials.
 Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
5. Planning for production  Dimensioned working drawings produced. Clear and detailed sequence of 9 out of 10
manufacture proposed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart.
 Picked up vital information from discussion with professionals.
6. Product realization  Completed to a high standard, fulfils the requirements of product specification and 28 out of 30
functions well. Good photographic record of manufacture.

7. Testing and evaluation  Objective testing but evaluation carried out in the actual environment. 9 out of 10
 Product evaluated against specification and by the client.
 Identification of strengths and weaknesses of the product leading to some
conclusions with proposals for further development.
Total mark awarded 92 mark out of 100

Portfolio Assessment of Shahmeer Bhatti

Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark
1. Identification of a need or  In depth analysis of design problem. Link with design clearly established. 4 out of 5
opportunity with a brief analysis  Descriptive design brief clearly identifying limitations and constraints.
leading to a design brief  Use of task analysis to setup an effective research.
2. Research into the design  Conclusive information gathered from research and summarized in analysis. 9 out of 10
brief resulting in a  Critical findings in mood board, product analysis, questionnaire, designer
specification research and client profile
 Detailed specification that is linked well with research.
3. Generation and exploration of  A wide range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing 18 out of 20
design ideas technique. Extensive use of descriptive annotations.
 Comparative analysis of ideas carried out
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.
4. Development of proposed  Impressive development of proposed solution using development nets, with 14 out of 15
solution appropriate design modifications and reasoned decision-making on materials.
 Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
5. Planning for production  Dimensioned working drawings produced. Clear and detailed sequence of 9 out of 10
manufacture proposed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart.
 Picked up vital information from discussion with professionals.
6. Product realization  Completed to a high standard, fulfils the requirements of product 29 out of 30
specification and functions well.
 Good photographic record of manufacture.
7. Testing and evaluation  Objective testing but evaluation carried out in the actual environment. 9 out of 10
 Product evaluated against specification and by the client.
 Identification of strengths and weaknesses of the product leading to some
conclusions with proposals for further development.
 Proposed viable solutions for future modifications
Total mark awarded 92 mark out of 100

Portfolio Assessment of Abdaal Zahid

Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark
1. Identification of a need or  Detailed analysis of problem and need clearly identified. 4 out of 5
opportunity with a brief  Descriptive design brief and reference to the user requirement is detailed.
analysis
leading to a design
 Good use of task analysis to explore different possibilities.
brief  Specific constraints clearly set up.
2. Research into the  Conclusive information gathered from research. 9 out of 10
design brief resulting in  Critical findings in mood board, product analysis, questionnaire, designer research
a specification
and client profile
 Detailed specification that is linked well with research.
3. Generation and  A wide range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing technique. 19 out of 20
exploration of design ideas  Comparative analysis of ideas carried out
 Use of descriptive annotations in developed ideas.
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.
4. Development of  Very good development of proposed solution, with appropriate design modifications 14 out of 15
proposed solution and reasoned decision-making on materials.
 Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
5. Planning for production  Dimensioned working drawings produced. Clear and detailed sequence of 9 out of 10
manufacture proposed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart.
 Picked up vital information from discussion with professionals.
6. Product realization  Completed to a high standard, fulfils the requirements of product specification and 27 out of 30
functions well. Good photographic record of manufacture.

7. Testing and evaluation  Objective testing but evaluation carried out in the actual environment. 9 out of 10
 Product evaluated against specification and by the client.
 Identification of strengths and weaknesses of the product leading to some
conclusions with proposals for further development.
Total mark awarded 92 mark out of 100

Portfolio Assessment of Fatima Aziz

Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

1. Identification of a need or  In depth analysis of design problem. Link with design clearly established. 4 out of 5
opportunity with a brief analysis  Descriptive design brief clearly identifying limitations and constraints.
leading to a design brief  Use of task analysis to setup an effective research.
2. Research into the design  Conclusive information gathered from research and summarized in analysis. 9 out of 10
brief resulting in a  Critical findings in mood board, product analysis, questionnaire, designer
specification research and client profile
 Detailed specification that is linked well with research.
3. Generation and exploration of  A wide range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing 19 out of 20
design ideas technique. Extensive use of descriptive annotations.
 Comparative analysis of ideas carried out
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.
4. Development of proposed  Impressive development of proposed solution using development nets, with 14 out of 15
solution appropriate design modifications and reasoned decision-making on materials.
 Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
5. Planning for production  Dimensioned working drawings produced. Clear and detailed sequence of 9 out of 10
manufacture proposed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart.
 Picked up vital information from discussion with professionals.
6. Product realization  Completed to a high standard, fulfils the requirements of product 27 out of 30
specification and functions well.
 Good photographic record of manufacture.
7. Testing and evaluation  Objective testing but evaluation carried out in the actual environment. 8 out of 10
 Product evaluated against specification and by the client.
 Identification of strengths and weaknesses of the product leading to some
conclusions with proposals for further development.
 Proposed viable solutions for future modifications
Total mark awarded 90 mark out of 100

Portfolio Assessment of Noor Mustafa

Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

1. Identification of a need or  Detailed analysis of problem and need clearly identified. 4 out of 5
opportunity with a brief  Descriptive design brief and reference to the user requirement is detailed.
analysis
leading to a design
 Good use of task analysis to explore different possibilities.
brief  Specific constraints clearly set up.
2. Research into the  Conclusive information gathered from research. 9 out of 10
design brief resulting in  Critical findings in mood board, product analysis, questionnaire, designer research
a specification
and client profile
 Detailed specification that is linked well with research.
3. Generation and  A wide range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing technique. 18 out of 20
exploration of design ideas  Comparative analysis of ideas carried out
 Use of descriptive annotations in developed ideas.
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.
4. Development of  Very good development of proposed solution, with appropriate design modifications 13 out of 15
proposed solution and reasoned decision-making on materials.
 Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
5. Planning for production  Dimensioned working drawings produced. Clear and detailed sequence of 8 out of 10
manufacture proposed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart.
 Picked up vital information from discussion with professionals.
6. Product realization  Completed to a high standard, fulfils the requirements of product specification and 28 out of 30
functions well. Good photographic record of manufacture.

7. Testing and evaluation  Objective testing but evaluation carried out in the actual environment. 8 out of 10
 Product evaluated against specification and by the client.
 Identification of strengths and weaknesses of the product leading to some
conclusions with proposals for further development.
Total mark awarded 88 mark out of 100