Scribd
Upload
46 views

Portfolio Assessment of Usman Baig Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

Usman Baig's portfolio was assessed on 7 criteria related to the design process. He received high marks across several areas. For criterion 1, his identification and analysis of the design problem and needs of the target user were thorough, leading to a clear design brief. For criterion 2, his research into the brief was extensive and justified the product specifications. For criterion 3, he generated a wide range of ideas and provided detailed evaluation. Overall, his portfolio demonstrated a strong understanding of the design process from identifying needs through research, idea generation, development, planning production, realization of the product, and testing/evaluation. His final total mark was 87 out of 100.

Uploaded by

TSS DT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
46 views

Portfolio Assessment of Usman Baig Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

Usman Baig's portfolio was assessed on 7 criteria related to the design process. He received high marks across several areas. For criterion 1, his identification and analysis of the design problem and needs of the target user were thorough, leading to a clear design brief. For criterion 2, his research into the brief was extensive and justified the product specifications. For criterion 3, he generated a wide range of ideas and provided detailed evaluation. Overall, his portfolio demonstrated a strong understanding of the design process from identifying needs through research, idea generation, development, planning production, realization of the product, and testing/evaluation. His final total mark was 87 out of 100.

Uploaded by

TSS DT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Portfolio Assessment of Usman Baig

Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

1. Identification of a need or  Need of the design according to the target user clearly identified
opportunity with a brief analysis
leading to a design
 In depth analysis of design problem. Link with design clearly established. 4 out of 5
brief  Design brief is clear, showing the constraints very clearly

2. Research into the design  Thorough research of design brief with the data collected.
brief resulting in a  Specifications of the product are justified through a detailed research analysis. 9 out of 10
specification  The mood board, product analysis and questionnaire are linked with the client profile

 A wide range of ideas with appropriate solutions. Evaluation of ideas are detailed according to the
3. Generation and exploration of desired specifications
17 out of 20
design ideas  Comparison of the initials shows the understanding of the technical knowledge
 Annotations are detailed and good but can be more presentable
 Development of idea is reasonably good, through the use of wide range of different techniques,
4. Development of proposed small details are included through sketching which gives a good understanding.
12 out of 15
solution  Good use of CAD to develop a solution.
 Effective use of modelling to set up an effective planning for production.
 Detailed working designs are present with the detailed dimensions.
5. Planning for production 9 out of 10
 Step by step whole manufacturing process is displayed using cutting list, time plan and flowchart.
 The product is completed to a very good standard, with the accuracy and most importantly
6. Product realization according to the expected specifications specification and functions. 27 out of 30
 Step by step photographic record of whole manufacturing process
 Real time testing carried out as the client took the product to the actual locations.
 Evaluation done against all the specifications developed.
7. Testing and evaluation 9 out of 10
 Identification of strengths and weaknesses of the product leading to some conclusions with
proposals for future improvement.

Total mark awarded 87 out of 100

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy