Scribd
Upload
56 views

Portfolio Assessment of Abdaal Zahid Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

Abdaal Zahid's portfolio was assessed across 7 criteria: 1) Identification of a need and design brief (4/5). 2) Research and specification development (8/10). 3) Generation and exploration of design ideas (17/20). 4) Development of a proposed solution (10/15). 5) Planning for production (9/10). 6) Product realization (27/30). 7) Testing and evaluation (7/10). Overall the portfolio was awarded 82 out of a possible 100 marks.

Uploaded by

TSS DT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
56 views

Portfolio Assessment of Abdaal Zahid Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

Abdaal Zahid's portfolio was assessed across 7 criteria: 1) Identification of a need and design brief (4/5). 2) Research and specification development (8/10). 3) Generation and exploration of design ideas (17/20). 4) Development of a proposed solution (10/15). 5) Planning for production (9/10). 6) Product realization (27/30). 7) Testing and evaluation (7/10). Overall the portfolio was awarded 82 out of a possible 100 marks.

Uploaded by

TSS DT
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Portfolio Assessment of Abdaal Zahid

Criterion Comments of Examiner Mark

1. Identification of a need or  Detailed analysis of problem and need clearly identified.


opportunity with a brief analysis  Descriptive design brief and reference to the user requirement is detailed.
4 out of 5
leading to a design  Good use of task analysis to explore different possibilities.
brief  Specific constraints clearly set up.

2. Research into the design  Conclusive information gathered from research.


brief resulting in a  The mood board, product analysis and questionnaire are linked with the client profile 8 out of 10
specification  Detailed specification that is linked well with research.

 A good range of ideas showing different possibilities using good drawing technique.
3. Generation and exploration of  Comparative analysis of ideas carried out
17 out of 20
design ideas  Use of annotations in developed ideas.
 Objective evaluation of ideas against specifications.

 Good development of proposed solution, with appropriate design modifications and reasoned
4. Development of proposed
decision-making on materials. 10 out of 15
solution
 Clear CAD model made to develop a solution, but not justified with prototype.
 Dimensioned working drawings produced.
5. Planning for production  Clear and detailed sequence of manufacturing process proposed, using cutting list, time plan and 9 out of 10
flowchart.
 Completed to a good standard, fulfils the specification developed earlier, and functions well.
6. Product realization 27 out of 30
 Detailed Photographic record of whole manufacturing process.

 Objective testing evaluation carried out in the actual environment.


7. Testing and evaluation  Product evaluated against specification and by the client. 7 out of 10
 Weaknesses and strengths are identified but the suggestions for the future could be added.

Total mark awarded 82 out of 100

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy