GeoArabia, v. 15, no. 3, 2010, p.

129-150 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain

Sequence-stratigraphic interpretation of structurally

controlled deposition: Middle Miocene Kareem Formation,
southwestern Gulf of Suez, Egypt
Ahmed I.M. Abd El-Naby, Hussam Ghanem, Mohamed Boukhary,
Mohamed H. Abd El-Aal, Sebastian Lüning and Jochen Kuss

ABSTRACT

The structural evolution and sequence-stratigraphic architecture of the syn-rift

Middle Miocene (Langhian) Kareem Formation were studied in the Western Sub-
Basin (WSB) of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Biostratigraphic data, facies interpretations,
and log data from thirteen wells were used to construct six tectono-sedimentary
scenarios and lithofacies-distribution maps, which illustrate the paleogeography
during six systems tracts. Abrupt thickness and facies changes reflect deep basins
and adjacent high-relief areas created by differential fault-block movements.
Within the WSB seven individual fault blocks record complex, tectonically
controlled deposition of the Kareem Formation, which we subdivide into two
third-order sequences. Earlier tectonic interpretations, facies analysis, and
stratigraphic correlations from individual fault blocks were used to interpret the
varying depositional settings during six systems tracts and, as a consequence, to
discern the structural evolution of the WSB during the Middle Miocene.

INTRODUCTION

The relationships between tectonics and sedimentation in extensional settings reveal the role of fault
evolution and interaction in controlling the deposition, dispersal, and architecture of syn-extensional
sediments (Gawthorpe et al., 1990, 1994; Gawthorpe and Hurst, 1993; Hardy et al., 1994; Gupta et
al., 1999; Young et al., 2000; Winn et al., 2001; Jackson et al., 2005; Herkat and Guiraud, 2006; Khalil
and McClay, 2008). Structural and sedimentological studies of active rift basins show that abrupt
thickness and facies changes as well as slip rates along normal faults are the major factors influencing
the spatial distribution and architecture of depositional systems adjacent to the fault zones (Seger
and Alexander, 1993; Gawthorpe and Leeder, 2000; Leeder et al., 2002; Jackson et al., 2005; Herkat
and Guiraud, 2006; Leppard and Gawthorpe, 2006; Khalil and McClay, 2008). In the southwestern
part of the Gulf of Suez, syn-rift clastics of the Kareem Formation formed coarse-grained fan deltas
and submarine fans at sediment-input points along the coastal plain. The aim of this paper is to
illustrate the structural control on sequence stratigraphy of the syn-rift Middle Miocene (Langhian)
Kareem Formation, and the tectonic influence on the location of major sediment-input points in the
southwestern part of the Gulf of Suez.

GEOLOGIC SETTING

The Gulf of Suez is a Neogene continental rift system that developed by the separation of the African
and Arabian plates in Late Oligocene – Early Miocene time. Geomorphologically it represents a
rejuvenated, slightly arcuate NW-SE topographic depression, known as the Clysmic Gulf. It extends
northwestward from 27°30’N to 30°00’N. Its width varies from about 50 km at its northern end to
about 90 km at its southern end where it merges with the Red Sea (Bosworth and McClay, 2001,
Figure 1). The Gulf of Suez is dissected by a complex pattern of faults: N-S to NNE-SSW as well as
E-W trending normal faults at the rift borders and within the rift basin, and NE-trending strike-slip
faults crossing the Gulf basin (Abd El-Naby et al., 2009). The interaction of these major fault systems
resulted in a complex structural pattern consisting of numerous horsts and grabens with variable
relief and dimensions.

The Gulf of Suez is subdivided into three structural provinces according to their structural settings
and regional dip directions: the northern Araba dip province (SW dips), the central Belayim dip

129
El-Naby et al.

30 province (NE dips), and the southern Amal-Zeit

a °

0'
32
dip province (SW dips, Figure 1). These provinces

°3
Gebel

32
Ataqa
N are separated by two NE-trending accommodation
zones: the Galala-Abu Zenima Accommodation
29
°3 30 zone (GAZAZ) in the north, and the Morgan
0' °N
Accommodation zone (MAZ) in the south. The
Soukhna
°E

study area of the WSB (about 60 km long and 12.5

Ain
32

Araba km wide) covers the MAZ and the northern part of

El Galala Dip the Amal-Zeit dip province (AZP, Figure 1).
El Bahariya Province

°
33
Based on surface and subsurface data, the
Galala-Abu stratigraphic succession of the Gulf of Suez can be
Zenima
Accommodation subdivided into three depositional units (Figure
29
° Zone 29 2, see Abd El-Naby et al., 2009). The pre-rift units
°3
Wadi Araba 0' include Proterozoic basement rocks and Paleozoic
to Upper Eocene sediments. These formations
Hammam are important as source and reservoir rocks. The
Faraun Upper Oligocene and Miocene syn-rift units
Gulf contain source, reservoir and seal lithologies, as
El G of Suez well as volcanic rocks. The post-rift units are of
El Q alala
ibliy Pliocene to Pleistocene age.
a
0'
°3

Belayim
32

28 Dip
°3
0' Province 29
°
Re Zo
hb ne
aS

b 33º 12’ 33º 24’ 33º 36’

he
a
r

Morgan

Ea
st
Be De vinc

Accommodation

er
2
la p e

n
Zone 1 28º 12’
Pr

yi

Su
e
m
o

b-
ba
W

Red Sea 5
es

sin
Hills
te

(n
4
rn

28

ot
Ac

° 28
Su

st
°3
M m ne
co Z

b-

ud
0'
b
or od
m o

ba

ie
ga a

d)
sin
n tio

8 9
6 7
n

28º 00’
°

10
33

Gebel
Am P

11
El Zeit Eastern
al ro

Amal-Zeit Desert
-Z vin
ei c

Dip N 12
tD e

13
°
34

Province
ee

0 6
km
p

27 Esh El- 27º 48’

°3
0' Mallaha 28
°
34°E 38° 42° 46° 50°
Caspian
54° 58° 1 = GC84-14
38°N TURKEY 38°
Sea
2 = LL87-3
CYPRUS SYRIA
34° LEBANON 34° 3 = ERDMA-1
Inferred - Minor IRAQ
IRAN
N300
Extensional Fault
Med
Sea 0 4 = GB84-6
JORDAN
KUWAIT km 30° 5 = GS334-2
Transfer Fault Figure 1a Gulf of
BAHRAIN
Oman 6 = NN88-1
26° 26°
Stratal Dip Direction EGYPT
SAUDI ARABIA QATAR 7 = NN89-1
Arabian
Shield
UAE 8 = AMAL-10 AST
22° OMAN 22°
Up
Extensional Fault SUDAN Red
9 = AMAL-8
Sea
18° 18° 10 = ERDMA-2
Contractional Fault 27
Red Sea °3 11 = SB374-2C
0 20 0' ERITREA YEMEN Arabian Sea

14° 14° 12 = SOUTH RAS EL-USH-1

Precambrian Gulf of Aden SOCOTRA
27 ETHIOPIA
°

13 = WEST ASHRAFI-1X
34

° km 34° 38° 42° 46° 50° 54° 58°

Figure 1: Tectonic map of the Gulf of Suez Rift (modified after Bosworth and McClay, 2001; Abd El-
Naby et al., 2009). The study area (rectangle, including location of the studied 13 wells) is located
in the northern Amal-Zeit dip provinces and the Morgan Accommodation Zone.

130
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rifting
Time Units Rock Units Lithology
South North
Our sequence-stratigraphic analysis of the
Kareem Formation is based mainly on the Pliocene
Post-Zeit
interpretation of key chronostratigraphic - Pleistocene
surfaces and systems tracts identified in

Messinia
13 wells located in the study area of the Zeit
Western Sub-Basin (WSB, Figure 1). We

Ras Malaab Group

Tortonian
Late
utilized lithologic interpretations, cuttings,
South Gharib
logs (Gamma Ray [GR], Resistivity,
Sonic, Density, and Neutron), planktonic
Hammam-Faroun
foraminifer abundances (PFA), and

Serravallian
Feiran

Belayim
benthonic/planktonic (B/P) ratios to detect
paleobathymetric and environmental Sidri
variations during deposition. Our approach

Syn-rift sequences

Middle
Baba
for defining the key surfaces and systems
Shagar

Kareem
tracts is based on Emery and Myers (1996),

Langhian
Posamentier and Allen (1999), and Rider Rahmi
(2004).
Asl
Tectono-sedimentary models and lithofacies
Hawara

Gharandal Group
distribution maps were constructed for six

Rudeis
systems tracts interpreted in the Kareem Burdigalian
Early

Formation. Facies analysis allows us to Mehiherrat

illustrate the effect of synrift cross faults
and fault-block movement on Kareem
sedimentation (Figures 2 and 3).
Aquitanian

Nukhul
DESCRIPTION OF KEY
SURFACES AND SYSTEMS Oligocene Abu Zenima
TRACTS
Upper

Darat
Eocene
The general description of both third-order
Lower

Thebes
sequences and six system tracts of the
Kareem Formation can be summarized as Paleocene Esna Shale
follows. Most sequence boundaries (SBs) are
marked by an abrupt decrease in GR and PFA Sudr Chalk
Senonian

Upper

(Figure 4). The lowstand systems tract (LST)

sediments above each are characterized Brown Limestone
Upper Cretaceous

by blocky GR, relatively high resistivity,

Pre-rift sequences

Lower

Matulla
low velocity, and high to low density
Nezzazat Group

and neutron log responses, along with Wata

Turonian
decreasing PFA and an increasing B/P ratio.
The lithology of these sediments consists Abu Qada
mainly of anhydrites and sandstones with Ceno-
manian Raha

Jurassic - Lower Nubia ‘A’

Cretaceous
Nubia ‘B’
Carboniferous

Pre-
Nubia ‘C and D’
Carboniferous

Pre-Cambrian Basement

Figure 2: Stratigraphic column of the Gulf of Suez (modified after Schlumberger, 1995;
Abd El-Naby et al., 2009).

131
El-Naby et al.

few argillaceous limestones and calcareous shales. Conglomerate clasts of mainly quartz with few
feldspar grains, plus granite, carbonate, and shale, are also present.

Transgressive surfaces (TS) are delineated by a gradual upward increase in GR and PFA, whereas
the transgressive surface of erosion (TSE) is characterized by an abrupt increase in GR and PFA. The
transgressive systems tracts (TST) are characterized by an upward increase in GR (“dirtying-upward”)
and PFA coupled with decreasing B/P ratios, moderate to low resistivity, and high to low velocity.
These sediments also are marked by high to low density and high to moderate neutron responses.
The TSTs are composed mainly of calcareous shales, argillaceous limestones, and sandstones with
few siltstones. Compared with the LST deposits, the TST sediments contain smaller clasts of quartz,
shale, and carbonate as well as fewer feldspar grains.

The maximum flooding surfaces (MFS) coincide with peaks in GR and PFA. In contrast to the TSTs,
the highstand systems tracts (HST) are marked by a gradual upward decrease in GR (“cleaning-
upward” trend) and PFA associated with increasing B/P ratios, moderate to low resistivity, high
to low velocity, moderate to low density, and high to moderate neutron readings. These sediments
consist of sandstones, calcareous shales, and argillaceous limestone intercalations with clasts of
mainly quartz, plus shale, carbonate, and feldspar grains.

Marine sediments are absent on Fault Block (FB) V (Figures 8 to 13), while only thin fluvial sandstones
(facies type C) are deposited on this fault block (Figure 3). These sandstones could not be referred
to one of the defined systems tracts.
The absence of marine sediments
in the Amal-Zeit Province (AZP) Petrography and Depositional
at ERDMA-2 and SB374-2C wells Lithology
fossil contents Environments
(Figures 8 to 13) reflects a structurally
controlled elevation of FB V above sea Sandstones Coarse grains, large pebbles, angular Fan delta
(A) to subrounded, poorly sorted.
level. Furthermore, Early – Middle Fe-oxides and carbonate cements.
Miocene sediments (Kareem, Rudeis Subrounded to angular clasts of mainly
quartz, feldspars, granite, carbonate,
and Nukhul formations) are absent mica flakes and shale. Few planktonic
at SB374-2C well (see below for more and benthonic foraminifers.

discussion). Sandstones Coarse to medium grains, smaller Submarine fan

(B) pebbles, subrounded to angular,
moderately to poorly sorted. Fe-oxides
Important characteristics, including and carbonate cements. Smaller
thickness, lithology, log trends, subrounded to angular clasts of similar
composition as fan delta. Few
foraminiferal trends, and depositional planktonic and benthonic foraminifers.
environments of all systems tracts of the Sandstones Coarse to medium grain, large Fluvial
two third-order genetic sequences of the (C) pebbles, subangular to angular, poorly
to moderately sorted. Fe-oxides and
Kareem Formation are summarized in carbonate cements. Unfossiliferous.
Figure 5. Moreover, we summarize the
Shales Grey-dark grey, flaky, silty fissile, highly Middle neritic
individual tectonic block movements calcareous, locally grading to to upper
and thickness variations during argillaceous limestones, highly bathyal
fossiliferous (rich in planktonic
deposition of all these systems tracts foraminifers and nannofossils with few
(Figure 6). benthonic foraminifers).

Limestones White to pale brown, cryptocrystalline, Lagoonal to

very fine, argillaceous, highly sandy, upper bathyal
DESCRIPTION OF FAULT locally cherty and anhydritic. Highly
BLOCKS IN THE WESTERN fossiliferous (rich in planktonic
foraminifers and nannofossils with few
SUB-BASIN (WSB) benthonic foraminifers).
Anhydrites Milky white, milky grey white, white, Lagoonal
micro- to cryptocrystalline, occasionally
Seven fault blocks (FB I to FB VI, calcareous.
including FB IVa and FB IVb) are
defined in a tentative tectono- Figure 3: Characteristics of the six major lithologies of the
sedimentary model in the study area Kareem Formation in the study area and general facies
(Figure 7). The location of these fault interpretations based on cuttings and core description
blocks along the WSB can be compared (with additional remarks from the original descriptions
to the two-way time-structure contour of the composite logs).

132
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

map of top Kareem Formation (Abd El-Naby et al., 2009). The blocks are bounded by six major cross
faults with near-orthogonal orientations to the NW-SE oriented clysmic faults (Figure 7). The rates of
vertical and horizontal movements along these cross faults varied, resulting in differential subsidence
rates and rotations of the individual fault blocks. Subsidence rates of the individual fault blocks were
deduced from thickness variations of the individual systems tracts within FB I to FB VI (Figure 6; see
also Young et al., 2000; Winn et al., 2001; Jackson et al., 2005; Herkat and Guiraud, 2006; Khalil and
McClay, 2008).

FB I is located at the northern boundary of the MAZ (Figure 7) and characterized by right-lateral
transtensional movements and low to moderate subsidence rates (Figure 6). FB II is located in the
MAZ southeast to the structurally higher FB I (Figure 7). Right-lateral transtensional movements of
FB II were accompanied by low to moderate subsidence rates (Figure 6). FB I and FB II reacted as one
fault block during during deposition of LST2 (see below for more discussion). FB III represents the
structurally lowest block in the WSB (Figure 7) with maximum subsidence rates indicated by high
sediment accumulation. It forms the southeastern boundary of the MAZ and is characterized by both
right-lateral and left-lateral transtensional movements (Figure 6). FB IV is located at the northeastern
part of the AZP (Figure 7) and underwent left-lateral transtensional movements associated with low
to moderate subsidence rates (Figure 6). This fault block was affected by a NW-oriented fault (Figures
8 to 13), which subdivided it into two sub-blocks (details are addressed below). FB V remained in a
structurally high position (above 90 sea level) during the entire time of Kareem deposition (Figures
7 to 13). FB VI, located at the southernmost part of the WSB (in the AZP), experienced left-lateral
transtensional movements, coupled with low to high subsidence rates (Figure 6).

SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY AND FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE KAREEM

FORMATION

Our third-order sequences of the Kareem Formation, KS1 (Kareem sequence 1) and KS2 (Kareem
sequence 2), can be contrasted with sequences S40 and S50 of Dolson et al. (1996), Ramzy et al. (1996),
and Krebs et al. (1997), which are widely distributed in the Gulf of Suez (Figure 5). Sequence S40
encompasses the lower part of the Kareem Formation and is underlain by the T30 “terrace” (erosional
unconformity, Figure 5).

Sequence S40 is overlain by the T40 terrace, which represents a third-order MFS with a condensed
section deposited in an open-marine environment (Ramzy et al., 1996). However, this MFS was never
observed in the field (Ramzy et al., 1996; Dolson et al. 1996). The T40 terrace is overlain by sequence
S50, coinciding with the upper part of the Kareem Formation. The T50 terrace above represents an
unconformable SB and forms the base to the Belayim Formation. Thus, the Kareem Formation was
interpreted as a single transgressive-regressive cycle (transgressive systems tract followed by highstand
systems tract) by Dolson et al. (1996). In contrast, we interpret two third-order sequences KS1 and KS2
in the Kareem Formation, which are described from base to top in the following sections.

Kareem Sequence 1 (KS1)

Lower Boundary of Kareem Sequence 1 (SB1)

The base of KS1 is Sequence Boundary 1 (SB1), a regional unconformity between the Kareem Formation
and underlying Rudeis Formation (Patton et al., 1994; Bosworth, 1995; Bosworth and McClay, 2001).
The abrupt decrease in GR at this surface is related to the basal anhydrite of the Kareem Formation,
which overlies distal marine shale of the Rudeis Formation. SB1 reflects a rapid change in the
environment of deposition triggered by a decrease in relative sea level (Underhill and Partington,
1993, 1994). The submarine expression of SB1 is an erosion surface below the early LST1 deposits
(Figure 4). In the WSB, SB1 marks the boundary between a retrogradational (“dirtying-upward”) log
motif of the upper part of the Rudeis Formation to an aggradational to progradational (“cleaning-
upward”) log motif of LST1 (Figure 4). SB1 can not be followed to the southernmost part of the WSB
(at the S. Ras El-Ush-1 well), due to a fault cut (Figure 4).

133
 4 GB84-6

LLD (ohmm)
0.2 2,000
5 GS334-2
2 LL87-3
LLS (ohmm) NPHI
LLD (ohmm)

Sonic
LLD (ohmm) 0.2 2,000

(API)
0.2 2,000 45 -15
%

Lithology
El-Naby et al.

0.2 2,000 MSFL (ohmm)

LLS (ohmm)

Gamma-Ray
LLS (ohmm) 0.2 2,000 RHOB

40
0.2 2,000

Sonic

140us/ft
0 150

(API)
Depth

Sonic
0.2 2,000

(API)
Lithology
MSFL (ohmm)

2.95

Lithology
Gamma-Ray
MSFL (ohmm) 6 NN88-1
0.2 2,000

Gamma-Ray
9,700

40
140us/ft
1.95 g/cc
0.2 2,000 Depth

40
140us/ft
0 150 3 ERDMA-1 LLD (ohmm) NPHI
1 GC84-14
0.2 2,000 45 -15
6,700 %
LLD (ohmm) NPHI LLS (ohmm)
LLD (ohmm)
RHOB
Sonic

Depth 0.2 2,000 45 -15 0.2 2,000

(API)

0.2 2,000 %
9,800
Lithology

LLS (ohmm) MSFL (ohmm)

LLS (ohmm)
2.95

Gamma-Ray

RHOB

Sonic
0.2 2,000

Sonic
8,000

(API)
0.2 2,000

Age
0.2 2,000
40

(API)
140us/ft

Stage
1.95 g/cc

Lithology
MSFL (ohmm)

Member
Surfaces
Lithology
6,800

Formation
2.95
MSFL (ohmm) Depth

Sequences
Gamma-Ray

PF Biozones
Gamma-Ray
0.2 2,000

System Tracts
40
140us/ft
0.2 2,000

1.95 g/cc

Sequence Strat.
0 150

40

140us/ft
0 150 6,700
Depth 9,900
Depth
8,100
9,800 6,900
SB3

Belayim
8,000
6,800
10,000
8,200
9,900

M6
7,000
8,100
6,900

HST2
10,100
8,300
10,000

KS2
7,100

Shagar
8,200
7,000
MFS2 10,200

15.1 (Ma)
8,400

Kareem
10,100
7,200

Langhian
8,300

134
TS2

Middle Miocent
7,100
10,300

LST2 TST2
SB2
8,500
10,200
7,300
8,400

M5b
KS1
MFS1 10,400

Markha
8,600
10,300 TS1 7,400
SB1 8,500

LST1 TST1 HST1

10,500

Upper
10,400

Rudeis
7,500
8,600
10,600

7,600

10,700

7,700

10,800

7,800

10,900

7,900

7 NN89-1
 7 NN89-1
NPHI
45 -15
%

RHOB

(API)
Sonic
11 SB374-2C

Lithology
10 ERDMA-2

2.95

Gamma-Ray
LLD (ohmm) NPHI

40
140us/ft
1.95 g/cc
0 150 LLD (ohmm) NPHI 45 -15
0.2 2,000
%
0.2 2,000 45 -15
8 AMAL-10 AST 9 AMAL-8 % LLS (ohmm)
RHOB

(API)
Sonic
LLS (ohmm) 0.2 2,000
RHOB

Lithology

(API)
Sonic
LLD (ohmm) NPHI NPHI 0.2 2,000
LLD (ohmm)

Gamma-Ray
Depth MSFL (ohmm)

Lithology
0.2 2,000 45 -15
0.2 2,000 45 -15 40

Gamma-Ray
MSFL (ohmm)
2.95

%
140us/ft
1.95 g/cc
% 0 150 0.2 2,000

40
9,600 LLS (ohmm)

2.95
LLS (ohmm) Depth

140us/ft
1.95 g/cc
RHOB 0 150 0.2 2,000

(API)
RHOB Depth

Sonic
0.2 2,000

(API)
Sonic
0.2 2,000

Lithology
3,100 9,600

Gamma-Ray
MSFL (ohmm)

Gamma-Ray
MSFL (ohmm)

40
40

2.95
2.95

140us/ft
1.95 g/cc
0 150 0.2 2,000

140us/ft
1.95 g/cc
Depth Depth 0 150 0.2 2,000
9,700
SB3
HST2 7,500 6,500
3,200 9,700
MFS2

TST2 9,800
7,600
6,600
TS2 3,300 9,800
LST2
SB2
9,900
7,700 6,700
3,400 9,900
HST1
MFS1
10,000
TST1 7,800 6,800
3,500 10,000

TS1
LST1
SB1 10,100
7,900
3,600
10,100

135
10,200

10,200

10,300

N
ez 10,300
Su
l f of
MAZ Gu AZP
9
8 11
Anhydrite 2 5 7 10,400
BP 3 10
Limestone 4 6
1

Sandstone 6’
2’ º3
º1 33
Figure 4: Correlation 28 10,500
Siltstone Eastern Desert
of the 11 studied 0 6 4’
Shale 0’ km º2
wells using logs, º0 33
28
Salt 10,600
biostratigraphic data,
’ 1 2’
and the interpreted Conglomerate º 48 33º
27
systems tract of the 10,700
Kareem Formation.

10,800
Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt
El-Naby et al.

Lowstand Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 1 (LST1)

LST1 sediments are characterized by low GR, relatively high resistivity, low velocity, high to low
density, and moderate to low neutron associated with decreasing PFA (Figure 5). Apart from the wells
on FB V in the southern part of the WSB, sediments of the LST1 are present throughout the WSB.
Argillaceous limestones and shales with few sandstones occur in the basin center and the southern
parts of the MAZ (Morgan Accommodation Zone) on FB II and FB III (at the ERDMA-1, GB84-6 and
GS334-2 wells, Figure 8). The lithology changes to anhydrites at FB I in the northern part of the MAZ
(at the GC84-14 and LL87-3 wells) and at FB IV south of this zone (at the NN88-1, NN89-1, and Amal-
10 AST wells, Figure 8). In the southernmost part of the WSB on FB VI (at the S. Ras El-Ush-1 and W.
Ashrafi-1X wells, Figure 8) the LST1 sediments are represented by argillaceous limestones. Thickness
of LST1 ranges between 1 ft at NN88-1 and 43 ft at Amal-10AST (Figure 4).
Sequences
Formation

Thickness

Major
System

PFA and B/P Depositional

Stage

sequences
tracts
Age

Lithology Log trends

(ft)

trends environments in
the G.O.S.
Belayim

SB3 T50
Calcareous shale, Decreasing GR Decreasing Middle neritic to
argillaceous (cleaning-upward), PFA and upper bathyal
limestone and moderate to low increasing B/P
30-722
HST2

sandstone of less resistivity and high ratio.

S50
polymictic clasts, moderate velocity.
Fe-oxides and Moderate to low
carbonate cement. density and high to
Few siltstone. moderate neutron.
T40
Calcareous shale Increasing GR Increasing Middle-outer
and argillaceous (dirtying-upward), PFA and neritic to upper
limestone intercala- moderate to low decreasing bathyal
45-153
KS1

TST2

tions. Few siltstone resistvity and B/P ratio.

and sandstone of velocity. Moderate to
less polymictic clasts, low density and high
Fe-oxides and to moderate neutron.
carbonate cement.

Mainly sandstone of Blocky or box car Abrupt Local restricted

polymictic clasts, mica high GR, relatively decrease in lagoons to upper
flakes, Fe-oxides and high resistivity and PFA and bathyal
14-432
LST2

carbonate cement. low velocity. increase in

Middle Miocene

Shale and Moderate to low B/P ratio.

Langhian

argillaceous cherty density and high to

Kareem

limestone. moderate neutron.

SB2
Calcareous shale Decreasing GR Decreasing Middle neritic to
and argillaceous (cleaning – upward), PFA and upper bathyal
limestone intercala- moderate to low increasing B/P
HST1

5-128

S40
tions. Sandstone of resistivity and ratio.
polymictic clasts, velocity. Moderate to
Fe-oxides and low density and high
carbonate cement. to moderate neutron.

Mainly calcareous Increasing GR Increasing Middle-outer

shale with (cleaning - upward), PFA and neritic to upper
argillaceous moderate to low decreasing bathyal
TST1
KS1

limestone and resistivity and high to B/P ratio.

5-98

sandstone of moderate velocity.

polymictic clasts, High to moderate
Fe-oxides and density and neutron.
carbonate cement.
Mainly anhydrite with Blocky or box car Abrupt Local restricted
argillaceous high GR, high decrease in lagoons to upper
limestone, shale and resistivity and low PFA and bathyal
LST1

1-43

few sandstone. velocity. High to increase in

moderate density and B/P ratio.
moderate to low
Rudeis
Upper

neutron.
SB1 T30

Figure 5: Petrographic, log, and micropaleontologic characteristics, with accompanying

interpretation, for all systems tract of the two third-order sequences (KS1 and KS2) of the Kareem
Formation. Our interpretation is compared to previously described sequences (S40 and S50) in the
Gulf of Suez (after Dolson et al., 1996; Ramzy et al., 1996; Krebs et al., 1997).

136
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

Interpretation of Lowstand Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 1 (LST1)

LST1 sediments deposited in portions of the WSB reflect relative sea-level fall that outpaced
subsidence. The appearance of the first Middle Miocene evaporites (on structurally elevated FB I and
FB IV, Figure 8a) at the base of the Kareem Formation, denotes an abrupt facies change from deep-
marine shale of the Rudeis Formation to a restricted lagoon in the southwestern part of the Gulf basin
(Dolson et al., 1996; Bosworth and McClay, 2001). In contrast, during deposition of LST1 sediments in
FB II and FB III in the MAZ and FB VI in the southernmost part of the WSB (Figure 8a), subsidence
rates apparently outpaced the fall in relative sea level resulting in deposition of mainly deep-marine
shales on FB III and hemi-pelagic carbonate sediments on FB II and FB VI (see also Winn et al., 2001;
Carr et al., 2003; Jackson et al., 2005; Khalil and McClay, 2008).

Rare terrigenous sediments, deposited in the MAZ on FB III (Figure 8a), may indicate fluvial processes,
resulting from discharge of small amounts of detritus from elevated Proterozoic and pre-Miocene
footwall blocks along the western rift shoulder (see also Gawthorpe et al., 1994; Salah and Alsharhan,
1997; Young et al., 2000; Winn et al., 2001; Jackson et al., 2005. The thin and nearly uniform thickness of
the LST1 sediments along the WSB indicates minor subsidence rates (Jackson et al., 2005). Thickness
variations along FB IV (Figure 6) indicate block rotation down to the southeast during deposition of
LST1 (Figure 8a). Similar relations between thickness variations and directions of fault block rotations
were described in the Gulf of Suez (Winn et al., 2001) and the eastern Atlasic Domain of Algeria
(Herkat and Guiraud, 2006).

Transgressive Surface of Kareem Sequence 1 (TS1)

This surface separates the aggradational to progradational LST1 deposits from the overlying
retrograding interval of TST1 (TS1, Figure 4). TS1 is marked by high GR and PFA and likely represents
the onset of transgression and rising sea level, and may have been
associated with erosion by high wave or tide energy in near-shore to
inner-shelf environments.
System Tracts

PF Biozones
Sequences
Formation
Stage
Age

Northwest Southeast
Blocks
Belayim

I II III IV V VI
a b No movement
SB3 (Stable block)
M6
HST2
Kareem Sequence 2

15.1
Ma
TST2
Middle Miocene
Langhian

Kareem

LST2

SB2
M5b
LST1 TST1 HST1
Sequence 1
Kareem

500

250

SB1 0 ft
Rudeis
Upper

Right-lateral Left-lateral LST = Lowstand System Tract TST = Transgressive

transtentional transtentional HST = Highstand System Tract System Tract
movement movement PF = Planktonic Foraminiferal SB = Sequence Boundary

Figure 6: Tectonic movements (arrows) and thickness variations of each fault block (gray shaded
areas) for the systems tract of the Kareem Formation. The sizes of the arrows are directly proportional
to the subsidence rates.

137
 Northwest Southeast
Morgan Accomodation Zone
(MAZ) Sea Level
Figure 7: Location of the fault blocks along the western sub-basin study
El-Naby et al.

area (compare Figure 1) showing two-way time structure contour map of

top Kareem Formation (modified after Abd El-Naby et al., 2009). These
fault blocks are bounded by major cross faults, which are perpendicular
D F G to the NW-SE oriented clysmic faults.
a
E V
b IV VI

Amal-Zeit Province
(AZP)
E Strike-Slip Fault
A B ’ ’

33
33
0’

º
Belayim 12 06
º º º0

º3
8

24
Province

’
6’
I 28 28 Normal Fault2

33
(BP)

º
C

30
’
1.6 Dipping directions
II 1.5 Gulf of Suez

33
º
Assumed basement
III

18
’
1.9 1.7 1.8 Depocenters
1.95 1.85
1.8
1.55 High Block

138
C 2.05

2.
B 1.8
1.75 2.1 2.0 Assumed fault
1.7
2.15 2.1

1.
1.9 1.8 2.1
6

A 1.2 X
1.7 1.5 1.55
1.3
D F 4’
1.5 1.45 º5
1.6 27
1.6
1.4
5 1.2 1.3 1.4
1.3 1.7
2.1 1.8
1.8 1.8

33
8
1 1.45 2.3

1.
1

º1
1.6 .5 2.0 G
5 2.4

2’
1.5 .6
5 1.9 2.6 2.7
1.8 1.6 2.5
7 2.3 2.8

1
6
1.7 1.7 1.9 1. 1.8 2.2 2.2 2.2

1. .7
1.6 1.65
1.8 2.6
1.4 1.5 1.6 2.3
5 1.65
1.55 1.9
1.4 1.3

1.4
1.3 1.1 1.2
1.0

Belayim
Province X’
(BP) Amal-Zeit Province

N
0 6 (AZP)
km Morgan Accomodation Zone
(MAZ) Eastern Desert

2’ ’ ’ ’

33
33
33
33
33

06 00 54

º
º
º

º1 º º º
º1
º2

12
30
36

28 28 28 27

’
8’
4’
’
’
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

Transgressive Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 1 (TST1)

The retrogradational TST1 sediments are characterized by an upward increase in GR (“dirtying-
upward”), moderate to low resistivity, high to moderate velocity, and high to moderate density and
neutron (Figure 5). These sediments also are marked by an upward increase in PFA and decreasing
B/P ratios. Lithologically these sediments are mainly calcareous shales deposited on FB I in the MAZ
(at the GC84-14 and LL87-3 wells, Figure 9), argillaceous limestones deposited on FB II in the MAZ (at
the ERDMA-1 well) and FB IVb and FB VI in the AZP (at the NN88-1, NN89-1, S. Ras El-Ush-1, and
W. Ashrafi-1X wells), and mainly shales with few argillaceous limestones on FB III in the MAZ (at the
GB84-6 and GS334-2 wells, Figure 9). In FB IVa of the AZP (at the Amal-10AST well, Figure 9), TST1
sediments are composed of sandstones (facies type A, Figure 3) and fine conglomerates at the base.
Sand grains are subrounded to angular and composed mainly of quartz, feldspar, granite, carbonate
and shale (see also Kandeel, 2008). The thickness of TST1 is quite variable (from 5 ft at GS334-2 to 98
ft at NN89-1, Figure 4).

Interpretation of Transgressive Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 1 (TST1)

Log response and lithofacies characteristics of TST1 sediments along portions of the WSB indicate an
upward-fining and upward-deepening succession into more distal and shale-rich marine sediments.
These likely were deposited during rising sea level and imply a decrease in depositional energy.
These sediments may have been deposited in low-energy, middle- to outer-neritic to upper-bathyal
environments, when the rate of sea-level rise exceeded the subsidence rate and the formation of
accommodation space outpaced the rate of sediment supply (Jackson et al., 2005). The TST1 sediments
are characterized by the presence of hemipelagic carbonates on FB II (in the MAZ), FB VI (in the
AZP) and FB IVb (Figure 9a). The low B/P ratio and the very high PFA of these deposits indicate the
incursion of a well-oxygenated, open-marine environment, following the evaporitic phase of LST1
(Dolson et al., 1996).

Northwest Southeast
(a) Morgan Accomodation Zone
(MAZ)

V
b VI
IV

Amal-Zeit Province
(AZP)

Belayim (b)
Province z
(BP) ue
I o fS
MAZ G ulf AZP
9
8 11
II 2 5 7
BP 3 10 13
4 6
1 12
III 6’
2’ º3
1 33
28º
Sediment
Supply Eastern 4’
1 = GC84-14 8 = AMAL-10 AST 0’ Desert º2
º 0 33
Shale Evaporite
N

2 = LL87-3 9 = AMAL-8 28
3 = ERDMA-1 10 = ERDMA-2 0 6
km
Sandstone High Area 4 = GB84-6 11 = SB374-2C 2 ’
8’ º1
Argillaceous 5 = GS334-2 12 = SOUTH RAS º 4 33
Systems Tract 27
Limestone 6 = NN88-1 EL-USH-1
Boundaries
7 = NN89-1 13 = WEST ASHRAFI-1X

Figure 8: Tectono-sedimentary model (a) and lithofacies distribution map (b) for lowstand
systems tract 1 (LST1) of the Kareem Formation.

139
El-Naby et al.

In contrast, polymictic clasts within pebbly sandstones (facies type A, Figure 3) and conglomerates
occur on FB IVa, indicating sediment influx along a major drainage system. Frequent slumping
occurred, with detritus derived from elevated Proterozoic and pre-Miocene footwall blocks along the
western rift shoulder. The drainage system extended along the elevated FB V and fed a prograding
fan delta on FB IVa (Figure 9a). This block was structurally higher and subsided less than FB IVb
during deposition of TST1. The absence of fan delta sediments on FB IVb reflects a drainage system
centered on an east-dipping FB V (Figure 9). Similar structurally controlled deposition of syn-rift
coarse-grained fan-delta systems is described from the eastern margin of the Gulf of Suez (Gawthorpe
et al., 1990; Gupta et al., 1999), northern margin of the Gulf of Suez (Young et al., 2000; Jackson et al.,
2005), northwestern margin of the Red Sea margin (Khalil and McClay, 2008), and Gulf of Corinth
(Dart et al., 1994).

During lower rates of relative sea-level rise the sediment supply was greater than the rate of generation
of new accommodation space at FB IVa, resulting in progradation of the delta on this block to the
northwest (Figure 9). However, during rapid relative sea-level rise the sediment supply was unable
to keep up with the increasing accommodation space, resulting in abandonment and transgression
across the fan. Thickness patterns along FB I, FB IVa, FB IVb, and FB VI (Figure 6) indicate that these
fault blocks rotated down to the southeast, whereas thickness trends along FB III reveal that this block
rotated down to the northwest during deposition of TST1 (compare to Herkat and Guiraud, 2006,
Figure 9).

Maximum Flooding Surface of Kareem Sequence 1 (MFS1)

A maximum flooding surface (MFS1) separates deposits of the retrograding interval of TST1 below
from the prograding deposits of HST1 above (Figure 4). This surface (including the TST1 sediments
below) is associated with high values in GR and PFA.

Northwest Sea Level

Southeast

(a) Morgan Accomodation Zone

(MAZ)
B
A

b VI
IV
Amal-Zeit Province
(AZP)

Belayim (b)
Province z
(BP) ue
I fS
lf o
MAZ Gu 9
AZP

8 11
II 2 5 7
BP 3 10 13
4 6
1 12
6’
III ’ º3
º 12 Sediment 33
28 Supply
Eastern 4’
1 = GC84-14 8 = AMAL-10 AST 0’ º2
Shale High Area 0 Desert 33
8º
N

2 = LL87-3 9 = AMAL-8 2
Systems Tract 3 = ERDMA-1 10 = ERDMA-2 0 6
Sandstone ’
km
Boundaries 2
4 = GB84-6 11 = SB374-2C 8’ º1
Argillaceous º 4 33
A = Alluvial 5 = GS334-2 12 = SOUTH RAS 27
Limestone Sediments 6 = NN88-1 EL-USH-1
Evaporite B = Fan Delta 7 = NN89-1 13 = WEST
C = Submarine Fan ASHRAFI-1X

Figure 9: Tectono-sedimentary model (a) and lithofacies distribution map (b) for transgressive
systems tract 1 (TST1) of the Kareem Formation.

140
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

Highstand Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 1 (HST1)

The progradational HST1 sediments are characterized by an upward decrease in GR (“cleaning-
upward”), moderate to low resistivity and velocity, moderate to low density, and high to moderate
neutron readings (Figure 5). These sediments also exhibit an upward decrease in PFA and increase
in B/P ratio. Lithofacies of the HST1 are similar to TST1 (Figure 10). However, the HST1 sediments
contain coarser grained sandstones (facies type A, Figure 3) with higher clast content on FB IVa in
the AZP (at the Amal-10AST and Amal-8 wells, Figure 10). Thickness of HST1 varies from 5 ft at Ras
El-Ush-1 to 128 ft at Amal-8 (Figure 4).

Interpretation of Highstand Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 1 (HST1)

Lithofacies, paleontological, and progradational features of HST1 indicate a gradual regression with
increasing terrigenous influx and transport during major river floods through drainage systems along
FB V. As a consequence, a second fan-delta lobe evolved on FB IVa towards the northwest when the
rate of sediment supply exceeded the rate of new accommodation space created by rising relative sea
level (Figure 10). The abundance of conglomerate clasts and the coarsening of sandstones (facies type
A) reflect increasing depositional energy and high-energy density flows, coupled with decreasing
water depths (Young et al., 2000). Compared with the high influx of fan-delta sediments on FB
IVa, few terrigenous sediments were deposited on FB III (in the MAZ, Figure 10a). The terrigenous
sediments on FB III and FB IVa reflect the progressive unroofing of the uplifted Proterozoic and pre-
Miocene footwall blocks along the western rift shoulder. At the same time, hemipelagic carbonates
accumulated on FB II, FB IVb, and FB VI (Figure 10) and indicate middle- neritic to upper-bathyal
deposition.

Thickness variations along FB I, FB III, and FB IVa (Figure 6) reveal that these blocks rotated down
to the northwest, whereas thickness patterns along FB IVb reflect that this block rotated down to the
southeast during deposition of HST1 sediments (Figure 10a). HST1 is limited upward by the second
sequence boundary (SB2) which caps Kareem sequence 1 (Figure 4).

Northwest Sea Level

Southeast
Morgan Accomodation Zone
(a) (MAZ)
B
A

b
VI
IV
Amal-Zeit Province
(AZP)
Belayim (b)
Province z
(BP) ue
fS
lf o
MAZ Gu 9
AZP
I
8 11
II 2 5 7
BP 3 10 13
4 6
1 12
6’
2’ º3
º1 33
III 28 Sediment
Supply
Eastern 4’
Figure 10: Tectono-sedimentary model (a) and 00
’
Desert 33
º2
N

º
lithofacies distribution map (b) for highstand 28 0 6
km
systems tract 1 (HST1) of the Kareem Formation. 8’ º 12
’
º4 33
27

141
El-Naby et al.

Kareem Sequence 2 (KS2)

Lower Boundary of Kareem Sequence 2 (SB2)

The base of KS2 is delineated by Sequence Boundary 2 (SB2). This surface is marked by an abrupt
decrease in GR and PFA, which may imply an abrupt jump to a shallower water facies during rapid
lowering of relative sea level. This surface also marks an upward change from a progradational
(“cleaning-upward”) log motif of HST1 deposits to an aggradational log motif of the overlying LST2
deposits (Figure 4).

Lowstand Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 2 (LST2)

The aggradational LST2 sediments have quite similar log characteristics to those of LST1 (Figure 5),
with dominantly sandstones (facies types A and B, Figure 3) deposited on FB I, FB II, FB IVb, and FB
IV (at the GC84-14, LL87-3, ERDMA-1, NN88-1, NN89-1, S. Ras El-Ush-1, and W. Ashrafi-1X wells,
Figure 11). Sandstones, shales, and argillaceous cherty limestones characterize sedimentation on FB
III (at the GB84-6 and GS334-2 wells), while anhydrites were deposited on FB IVa (at the Amal-10AST
and Amal-8 wells, Figure 11). The thickness of LST2 changes from 14 ft at Amal-10AST to 432 ft at
GB84-6 (Figure 4).

Interpretation of Lowstand Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 2 (LST2)

The sandstones (facies types A and B) and polymictic conglomerate clasts as well as mica in the
LST2 sediments demonstrate high terrigenous influx in the WSB. The drainage systems experienced
frequent slumping with abundant detritus likely supplied from the same source as sediments of LST1
(Figure 11b). These drainage systems fed prograding fan deltas during LST2 on the structurally high FB
I and FB II (in the MAZ) and FB IVb and FB VI (in the AZP, compare Gawthorpe et al., 1994; Salah and
Alsharhan, 1997; Young et al., 2000). The role of antecedent drainage systems in focusing deposition
of coarse-grained sediments is well known from similar rift basins, e.g. Gulf of Corinth (Seger and
Alexander, 1993), Gulf of Suez (Gawthorpe et al., 1990; McClay et al., 1998; Gupta et al., 1999; Leppard
and Gawthorpe, 2006), and the eastern Atlasic Domain of Algeria (Herkat and Guiraud, 2006).

LST2 received sediment also from turbidity currents beyond the shelf edge where accommodation
was greater on structurally low FB III in the MAZ (compare to Young et al., 2000; Winn et al., 2001,
Figure 11). This turbidity formed submarine fans composed of small clasts and fine-grained sandstones
(facies type B, Figure 3). These clast-rich turbidites reflect an increase in depositional energy coupled
with decreasing water depths (compare Young et al., 2000). Deposition of deep-marine carbonates in
the upper part of LST2, on structurally low FB III in the MAZ (at the GB84-6 well, Figure 11b), was
relatively short-lived. The carbonates may have developed during a break in siliciclastic deposition
or lateral to the main clastic entry point. The carbonates were locally re-worked when sand was
subsequently transported across them, possibly due to delta channel or lobe switching or sudden
sediment input during seasonal fluvial flooding. Deposition of deep-marine pelagic shales during
late LST2 on the structurally low FB III may reflect the cessation of siliciclastic deposition (Figure
11a). Furthermore, the presence of large amounts of Fe-oxides in this portion of LST2 may indicate
deposition in an oxidizing environment (Salah and Alsharhan, 1997).

FB IVa represented an elevated ridge with weak subsidence rates during KS1; the deposition of fan
deltas resulted in a progressive reduction in water depth and evaporate sedimentation (compare
Herkat and Guiraud, 2006, Figure 11a). On FB I and FB II in the MAZ, sediment supply exceeded
subsidence rates and resulted in the deposition of fan-delta sediments on both fault blocks with
greater thickness on the structurally deeper FB II. At the end of LST2 accumulation on the two fault
blocks was balanced and, as a consequence, both fault blocks (I and II) reacted during future intervals
as one (Figure 11a). The great thickness of LST2 sediments on FB III implies high sediment supply
(Figure 6) coupled with high subsidence rates. Thickness variations along FB III (Figure 6) indicate
rotation down to the northwest (similar to FB IVa), whereas thickness variations along FB VI reflect
a rotation down to the southeast.

Transgressive Surface of Kareem Sequence 2 (TS2)

The upper boundary of LST2 is marked by an abrupt increase in GR which delineates the TS2 surface
(Figure 4). TS2 represents the onset of a major sea-level rise that may have been associated with
transgressive erosion.

142
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

Northwest Sea Level Southeast

(a) Morgan Accomodation Zone

(MAZ)
A

a
B B
V
b
VI
IV
Amal-Zeit Province
(AZP)
C
(b)
I II
Belayim z
ue
Province o fS
MAZ ulf
(BP) G 9 AZP
8 11
2 5 7
BP 3 10 13
4 6
Shale Alluvial 1 12
A = Sediments
6’
Calcareous 2’ º3
B = Fan Delta 1 33
Shale 28º Sediment
C = Submarine Fan Supply
Sandstone 4’
1 = GC84-14 ’ Eastern º2
Argillaceous
III 00 Desert 33

N
º
2 = LL87-3 28 0 6
Limestone km
3 = ERDMA-1 ’
Argillaceous 2
4 = GB84-6 8’ º1
Cherty Limestone º4 33
27
5 = GS334-2
Evaporite 6 = NN88-1 10 = ERDMA-2 Figure 11: Tectono-sedimentary model
High Area 7 = NN89-1 11 = SB374-2C (a) and lithofacies distribution map (b)
Systems Tract 8 = AMAL-10 AST 12 = SOUTH RAS EL-USH-1 for lowstand systems tract 2 (LST2) of
Boundaries 9 = AMAL-8 13 = WEST ASHRAFI-1X
the Kareem Formation.

Transgressive Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 2 (TST2)

TST2 sediments have quite similar lithologic and log characteristics to those of TST1. TST2 sediments
are mainly calcareous shales with few sandstones and argillaceous limestone intercalations on FB I,
FB II, and FB IVa (at the GC84-14, LL87-3, ERDMA-1, Amal-10AST and Amal-8 wells); mainly shales
with sandstones and few limestone intercalations on FB III (at the GB84-6 and GS334-2 wells); and
argillaceous limestones with few sandstones on FB IVb (at the NN88-1and NN89-1 wells, Figure 12).
Sandstones (facies type B, Figure 3), siltstones, shales, and few limestone intercalations accumulated
on FB VI (at S. Ras El-Ush-1 and W. Ashrafi-1X) at the southernmost part of the WSB (Figure 12). The
thickness of TST2 varies from 45 ft at S. Ras El-Ush-1 to 153 ft at NN 88-1 (Figure 4).

Interpretation of Transgressive Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 2 (TST2)

The log motif and lithologic properties of TST2 along the WSB indicate repeated upward-fining and
upward-deepening retrogradational parasequences composed mainly of distal, shale-rich, marine
sediments. The frequent occurrence of planktonic foraminifer and nannofossils in these sediments
indicate low-energy middle- to outer-neritic to upper-bathyal depositional settings. In contrast to
TST1, hemipelagic carbonates are only recorded on FB IVb (Figure 12).

Pebbly sandstones (facies type B, Figure 3), with polymictic clasts, siltstones, and shales (rich in
planktonic foraminifer and nannofossils) intercalations on FB VI reflect deposition of a submarine
fan associated with high subsidence rates (Figure 12a). The source of this submarine fan, like during
LST2, was detritus derived from the elevated Proterozoic and pre-Miocene footwall blocks along the
western rift shoulder. Drainage systems extended along the elevated FB V above sea level and fed
submarine fans that prograded to the southeast (Figure 12a). Progradation of the submarine fans

143
El-Naby et al.

indicates that sediment supply was greater than the rate of newly generated accommodation space at
FB VI. However, sediment supply was unable to keep up with accommodation development across
the fan at FB VI resulting in abandonment and transgression (compare Young et al., 2000; Herkat and
Guiraud, 2006). Generally, the “dirtying-upward” GR of TST2 (Figure 4) may be a result of a decrease
in sand percentage in thinly bedded turbidites, and so may record the abandonment of submarine-
fan deposition.

Compared to the high influx of submarine fan sediments, little terrigenous material was deposited
on FB I, FB II, and FB III (in the MAZ) and on FB IVa and FB IVb (in the AZP) via the drainage
systems on FB V (Figure 12). The nonmarine units indicate a return to fluvial processes and to
progressive unroofing of the uplifted Proterozoic and pre-Miocene footwall blocks along the western
rift shoulder. FB IVa is characterized by higher subsidence rates than FB IVb during TST2 deposition.
This difference led to deep-marine pelagic shale with higher planktonic foraminiferal abundance on
FB IVa, in contrast to hemipelagic carbonates on FB IVb (Figure 12a). The movement of FB IVa marks
an inversion of the subsidence compared with the deposition of preceding system tracts (Herkat and
Guiraud, 2006). Thickness variations of TST2 along FB III and FB VI (Figure 6) indicate that these
blocks rotated down to the southeast, whereas thickness variations along FB IVb reveal that this block
rotated down to the northwest.

Maximum Flooding Surface of Kareem Sequence 2 (MFS2)

MFS2 delineates the upper boundary of the retrogradational succession TST2. The surface is marked
by maximum GR response and PFA (Figure 4). It may coincide with the T40 terrace of Ramzy et al.
(1996). MFS2 is overlain by the prograding interval of HST2.

Highstand Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 2 (HST2)

HST2 sediments have very similar log features to those of HST1 (Figure 5). Moreover, they show
similar lithologic characteristics as TST2 sediments, with mainly sandstones (facies type B, Figure 3),

Northwest Sea Level Southeast

(a) Morgan Accomodation Zone

(MAZ)
A

V C
b

IV
I II
Amal-Zeit Province
Belayim
(AZP)
Province
(b) VI
(BP)
ez
f Su
lf o
MAZ Gu 9 AZP
Figure 12: Tectono- 8 11
2 5
sedimentary model (a) and BP 3
7
10 13
4 6
1
lithofacies distribution 12
6’
map (b) for transgressive 2’ º3
º1 Sediment 33
28
systems tract 2 (TST2) of III
Supply
the Kareem Formation. Eastern 4’
00
’ º2
Desert 33
N

º
28 0 6
km
’
8’ º 12
º4 33
27
144
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

shales, and few limestone intercalations deposited on FB III (at the GB84-6 and GS334-2 wells, Figure
13). The sandstones contain clasts that are smaller in size than those of TST2. The thickness of HST2 is
quite variable (ranging between 30 ft at NN89-1 and 722 ft at W. Ashrafi-1X, Figure 4).

Interpretation Highstand Systems Tract of Kareem Sequence 2 (HST2)

The coarsening- or sandying-upward pattern of HST2 reflects a decelerating relative sea-level rise
and return to terrigenous sedimentation across the shelf. A submarine fan was deposited during this
interval on FB VI (Figure 13a). With its southeasterly directed progradation, we assume a similar
source as for the TST2 submarine fans (Figure 13). The large thickness of HST2 (Figure 6) on FB VI
indicates high subsidence rates of this fault block. Furthermore, submarine fan progradation suggests
that sediment supply exceeded the rate of new accommodation space at FB VI. At the same time,
hemipelagic carbonate sediments accumulated on FB IVb (Figure 13a).

Another submarine fan formed on FB III (Figure 13a) with a similar source of terrigenous material
as submarine fan deposited during LST2. On the other hand, smaller clast sizes may indicate minor
fluvial discharge (Young et al., 2000). This fan’s large thickness (Figure 6) reflects deposition coupled
with high subsidence rates of this fault block. Similar to TST2, only thin terrigenous sediments were
deposited on FB I and FB II (in the MAZ) or FB IVa and FB IVb (in the AZP). Thickness variations
along FB IVa and FB VI (Figure 6) indicate that these blocks rotated down to the southeast, whereas
isopach patterns along FB IVb reveal that this block rotated down to the northwest.

Northwest Sea Level

Southeast
(a) Morgan Accomodation Zone A
(MAZ)

a V
C

IV
C Amal-Zeit Province
(AZP)

Belayim II
Province I VI
(b)
(BP)
z
ue
fS
lf o
MAZ
Gu 9
AZP

8 11
Shale Systems Tract 2 5
BP 7 13
Calcareous Boundaries 3 4 10
1 6
12
Shale A = Alluvial
Sediments 6’
’ º3
Sandstone B= º 12 Sediment 33
Fan Delta 28
C = Submarine Fan Supply
Argillaceous
Limestone 4’
1 = GC84-14 0’ Eastern º2
º0 33
Desert
N

Argillaceous 2 = LL87-3 III 28

0 6
Cherty Limestone 3 = ERDMA-1 km
2 ’
’ º1
Evaporite 4 = GB84-6 9 = AMAL-8 º 48 33
27
5 = GS334-2 10 = ERDMA-2
Siltstone
6 = NN88-1 11 = SB374-2C Figure 13: Tectono-sedimentary model (a) and
High Area 7 = NN89-1 12 = SOUTH RAS EL-USH-1 lithofacies distribution map (b) for highstand
8 = AMAL-10 AST 13 = WEST ASHRAFI-1X
systems tract 2 (HST2) of the Kareem Formation.

145
El-Naby et al.

Upper Boundary of Kareem Sequence 2 (SB2)

The upper limit of HST2 is determined by a third sequence boundary SB3 (Figure 4) which is marked
by an abrupt decrease in GR. It coincides with the T50 terrace (Figure 5), a major unconformity in the
Gulf of Suez (Dolson et al., 1996; Ramzy et al., 1996; Krebs et al., 1997).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Complex interaction between eustasy and tectonism apparently controlled the depositional processes
and sequence development of the Middle Miocene (Langhian) Kareem Formation in the NW-SE
oriented extensional WSB. The complicated structural and depositional history with abrupt thickness
and facies changes, deep basins, high relief, and differential fault-block movements is similar to
structural and depositional complexity recorded elsewhere in the Gulf of Suez rift (e.g. Burchette,
1987; Schütz, 1994; Winn et al., 2001), the coastal Red Sea (e.g. Montenat et al., 1988; Gawthorpe et al.,
1990; Purser et al., 1990; Khalil and McClay, 2006), the central North Sea basin (Bishop et al., 1995), the
north-eastern Gulf of Mexico (Wu et al., 1990), Central Greece Gulf basins (e.g. Gulf of Corinth and
Gulf of Evvia, Gawthorpe et al., 1994) and other continental rifts (e.g. Gawthorpe and Hurst, 1993).
The Kareem Formation in the study area can be subdivided into two third-order sequences based on
the identification of key chronostratigraphic surfaces and system tracts.

The depositional models we propose for the syn-rift sediments of the various systems tracts of both
sequences indicate a strong tectonic influence controlling subsidence of the individual fault blocks
along the WSB during the “mid-Clysmic” or “mid-Rudeis” event (Patton et al., 1994). This event caused
a rejuvenation of basement faults, which resulted in abrupt thickness and facies changes coupled
with rotation of the different fault blocks during deposition of the Kareem Formation. The high dip
angle of the faults (> 60°) along the WSB created steep topographic and bathymetric gradients and
development of depositional systems with a discrete shelf-slope break along the western rift shoulder
(compare Gawthorpe et al., 1994). Our tectono-sedimentary models might be applied to other rift
basins where pre-existing basement structures have exerted a strong control on rift-fault geometries
and patterns.

Most of the systems tracts are preserved as complete successions with larger thicknesses in the Morgan
Accommodation Zone (MAZ), because major transfer (accommodation) zones commonly represent
footwall topographic lows. Hence, the accommodation zone acts as a focus for increasing volumes
of sediment entering rifts (compare Leeder and Gawthorpe, 1987; Morely et al., 1990; Gawthorpe
et al., 1994; Jackson et al., 2005). Overall, the rate of subsidence of the hangingwall and resulting
accommodation development, coupled with high rate of sediment supply, exceeded the rate of
relative sea-level fall during deposition of the Kareem Formation.

Compared with the first Kareem sequence (KS1), subsidence rates of the second Kareem sequence
(KS2) were significantly larger as indicated by larger thicknesses and deposition of a large number
of thick fan deltas and submarine fans (mainly on FB III and FB VI). These thick deposits may reflect
increased sediment supply due to wet climates during the Middle Miocene (Perrin et al., 1998; Mader
et al., 2004).

The submarine fans apparently originated from drainage systems that experienced frequent slumping.
Abundant detritus was derived from the elevated Proterozoic and pre-Miocene footwall blocks along
the western rift shoulder. The drainage systems also yielded thin fluvial sandstones on the structurally
elevated FB V (above sea level) at the ERDMA-2 well. This sandstone can not be placed into one of
the defined systems tracts due to its reduced thickness, which also makes it difficult to differentiate
from the underlying Rudeis Formation. Moreover, strong fluvial influx on the structurally high FB
V resulted in the erosion of Early to Middle Miocene sediments (early Kareem, Rudeis and Nukhul
formations) in the Amal-Zeit Province (AZP) at the SB374-2C well.

Within our sequence stratigraphic framework, the interaction between tectonism and sedimentation
of the syn-rift Kareem Formation becomes more obvious and allows highlighting the paleotectonic
history. Despite the depositional complexity, small-scale fault block by fault block facies interpretation
allows delineating tectonically influenced sedimentation processes. Our tectono-sedimentary models

146
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

could be used for facies-predictions in the other parts of the extensional Gulf of Suez rift basin to
clarify the poor understanding of interacting tectonism and sedimentation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are deeply indebted to Dr. Christian Scheibner, Geochronology Department, Bremen University
(Germany) for fruitful discussion and careful revision of an earlier version of the manuscript. We also
thank RWE DEA AG Petroleum Company, Hamburg, Germany, for various software support. We wish
to express our gratitude to the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation (EGPC) for releasing the log
data. We would like to extend our special thanks to our colleagues of the Geochronology working
group in Bremen University for various help. The two anonymous reviewers are also thanked for their
valuable comments and suggestions. The drafting and design of the paper by Nestor A. Buhay II is
much appreciated.

REFERENCES

Abd El-Naby, A., M. Abd El-Aal, J. Kuss, M. Boukhary and A. Lashin 2009. Structural and basin
evolution in Miocene time, southwestern Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und
Paläontologie – Abhandlungen, v. 251, no. 3, p. 331-353.
Armentrout, J.M. and J.F. Clement 1990. Biostratigraphic calibration of depositional cycles: a case
study in High Island-Galveston-East Breaks, offshore Texas. In Sequence Stratigraphy as an
Exploration Tool, Concepts and Practices in the Gulf Coast. SEPM, Gulf Coast Section, Eleventh
Annual Research Conference, Program with Abstracts, p. 21-51.
Beleity, A.M. 1984. The composite standard and definition of paleoevents in the Gulf of Suez: Egyptian
General Petroleum Corporation, Sixth Exploration Conference, p. 181-198.
Bishop, D.J., P.G. Buchanant and C.J. Bishop 1995. Gravity-driven thin-skinned extension above
Zechstein Group evaporites in the western central North Sea: An application of computer-aided
section restoration techniques. Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 12, p. 115-135.
Bosworth, W. 1995. A high-strain rift model for the southern Gulf of Suez, Egypt. In J.J. Lambiase (Ed.),
Hydrocarbon Habitat in rift basins. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 80, p. 75-
112.
Bosworth, W. and K. McClay 2001. Structural and stratigraphic evolution of the Gulf of Suez Rift,
Egypt: A synthesis. In P.A. Ziegler, W. Cavazza, A.H.F Robertson and S. Crasquin-Soleau (Eds.),
Peri-Tethys Memoir 6: Peri-Tethyan rift/wrench basins and passive margins. Museum National
d’Histoire naturelle de Paris, Memoirs, v. 186, p. 567-606.
Burchette, T.P. 1987. Tectonic control on carbonate platform facies distribution and sequence
stratigraphy: Miocene, Gulf of Suez. Sedimentary Geology, v. 59, p. 179-204.
Carr, I.D., R.L. Gawthorpe, C.A.L. Jackson, I.R. Sharp and A. Sadek 2003. Sedimentology and sequence
stratigraphy of early syn-rift tidal sediments: The Nukhul Formation, Suez Rift, Egypt. Journal of
sedimentary research, v. 73, p. 407-421.
Dart, C.J., R.E.L. Collier, R.L. Gawthorpe, J.V. Keller and G. Nichols 1994. Sequence stratigraphy of
(?) Pliocene-Quaternary syn-rift Gilbert type deltas, northern Peloponnesos, Greece. Marine and
Petroleum Geology, v. 11, p. 545-560.
Dolson, J., O. El Gendi, H. Charmy, M. Fathalla and I. Gaafar 1996. Gulf of Suez rift basin sequence
models – Part A. Miocene sequence stratigraphy and exploration significance in the Greater
October field area, northern Gulf of Suez. In Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation. Thirteen
Exploration Conference, Cairo, Egypt, v. 2, p. 227-241.
Emery, D. and K. Myers 1996. Sequence stratigraphy. Blackwell Science. Ltd., Oxford, 297 p.
Gawthorpe, R.L. and J.M. Hurst 1993. Transfer zones in extensional basins: Their structural style
and influence in drainage development and stratigraphy. Journal of the Geological Society, v. 150,
p. 1137-1152.
Gawthorpe, R.L. and M.R. Leeder 2000. Tectono-sedimentary evolution of active extensional basins.
Basin Research, v. 12, p. 195-218.
Gawthorpe, R.L., J.M. Hurst and C.P. Sladen 1990. Evolution of Miocene footwall derived coarse-
grained deltas. Gulf of Suez, Egypt: Implications for exploration. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 74, p. 1077-1086.
Gawthorpe, R.L., A.J. Fraser and R.E. Li. Collier 1994. Sequence stratigraphy in active extensional

147
El-Naby et al.

basins: implications for the interpretation of ancient basin-fills, Marine and Petroleum Geology,
v. 11, no. 6, p. 642-658.
Gupta, S., J.R. Underhill, I.R. Sharp and R.L. Gawthorpe 1999. Role of fault interactions in controlling
synrift sediment dispersal patterns: Miocene Abu Alaqa Group. Suez Rift, Sinai, Egypt. Basin
Research, v. 11, p. 167-189.
Hardy, S., C.J. Dart and D. Waltham 1994. Computer modelling of the influence of tectonics on
sequence architecture of coarse-grained fan deltas. Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 11,
p. 561-574.
Herkat, M. and R. Guiraud 2006. The relationships between tectonics and sedimentation in the Late
Cretaceous series of the eastern Atlasic Domain (Algeria). Journal of African Earth Sciences.
v. 46, p. 346-370.
Jackson, C.A.L., R.L. Gawthorpe, I.D. Carr and I.R. Sharp 2005. Normal faulting as a control on the
stratigraphic development of shallow marine syn-rift sequences: The Nukhul and Lower Rudeis
formations, Hammam Faraun fault block, Suez Rift, Egypt. Sedimentology, v. 52. p. 313-338.
Kandeel, A.A.E. 2008. Geological modeling and reservoir characterization of Kareem Formation
in Amal oil field, south Gulf of Suez. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt,
252 p.
Khalil, S.M. and K.R. McClay 2008. Structural control on syn-rift sedimentation, northwest Red Sea
Margin, Egypt. Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 26, p. 1018-1034.
Krebs, W.N., D. Wescott, I. Nummedahl, G. Gaafar, G. Azazi and S. Karamat 1997. Graphic correlation
and sequence stratigraphy of Neogene rocks in the Gulf of Suez. In Fauna, Flora and Sequence
Stratigraphy. Association Paleontologie Francaise de Stratigraphie, v. 168, no. 1, p. 64-71.
Leeder, M.R. and R.L. Gawthorpe 1987. Sedimentary models for extensional tilt-block/half-graben
basins. In M.P. Coward, J.F. Dewey and P.L. Hancock (Eds.), Continental extensional tectonics.
Geological Society of London Special Publication no. 28, p. 139-152.
Leeder, M.R., R.E. Li. Collier, A.L.H. Aziz, M. Trout, G. Ferentinos, G. Papatheodorou and E. Lyberis
2002. Tectono-sedimentary processes along an active marine/lacustrine half-graben margin:
Alkyonides gulf, Gulf of Corinth, Greece. Basin Research, v. 14, p. 25-41.
Leppard, C.W. and R.L. Gawthorpe 2006. Sedimentology of rift climax deep water systems; Lower
Rudeis Formation, Hammam Faraun fault block, Suez Rift, Egypt. Sedimentary Geology, v. 191,
p. 67-87.
Mader, D., L. Cleaveland, D.M. Bice, A. Montanari and C. Koeberl 2004. High-resolution
cyclostratigraphic analysis of multiple climate proxies from a short Langhian pelagic succession
in the Conero Riviera, Ancona (Italy). Palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology, palaeoecology, v. 211,
p. 325-344.
McClay, K.R., G.J. Nichols, S. Khalil, M. Darwish and W. Bosworth 1998. Extensional tectonics and
sedimentation, eastern Gulf of Suez, Egypt. In B.H. Purser and D.W.J. Bosence (Eds.), Sedimentation
and Tectonics of Rift Basins, Red Sea-Gulf of Aden. Chapman and Hall, London, p. 223-238.
Mitchum, R.M. Jr., J.B. Sangree, P.R. Vail and W.W. Wornardt 1993. Recognizing sequences and systems
tracts from well logs, seismic data, and biostratigraphy: Examples from the late Cenozoic. In
P. Weimer and H.W. Posamentier (Eds.), Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy. Recent developments
and applications. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir no. 58, p. 163-197.
Montenat, C., P. Ott D’estevou, B. Purser, P.F. Burollet, J.-J. Jarrige, F. Orszag-Sperber, E. Philobbos, J.-C.
Plaziat, P. Prat, J.-P. Richert, N. Roussel and J.-P. Thiriet 1988. Tectonic and sedimentary evolution
of the Gulf of Suez and the northwestern Red Sea. Tectophysics, v. 153, p. 161-177.
Morely, C.K., R.A. Nelson, T.L. Patton and S.G. Munn 1990. Transfer zones in the East Africa rift
system and their relevance to hydrocarbon exploration in rifts. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists Bulletin, v. 74, p. 1234-1253.
Nummedal, D. and D.J.P. Swift 1987. Transgressive stratigraphy at sequence bounding unconformities:
Some principles derived from Holocene and Cretaceous examples. In D. Nummedal, O.H. Pilkey
and J.D. Howard (Eds.), Sea Level Fluctuations an Coastal Evolution. Society of Economic
Paleontology and Mineralogy Special Publication no. 41, p. 241-260.
Patton, T.L., A.R. Moustafa, R.A. Nelson and S.A. Abdine 1994. Tectonic evolution and structural
setting of the Suez Rift. In S.M. London (Ed.), Interior Rift Basins. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists Memoir, no. 59, p. 7-55.
Perrin, C., J.C. Plaziat and B.R. Rosen 1998. Miocene coral reefs and reef corals of the south-western
Gulf of Suez and north-western Red Sea: Distribution, diversity and regional environmental

148
 Middle Miocene Kareem Formation, Egypt

controls. In B.H. Purser and D.W.J. Bosence (Eds.), Sedimentation and Eectonics of Rift Basins:
Red Sea-Gulf of Aden. Chapman and Hall, London, p. 296-320.
Posamentier, H.W. and G.P. Allen 1999. Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy - concepts and applications.
SEPM concepts in Sedimentology and Paleontology, no. 7, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 204 p.
Purser, B.H., E.R. Philobbos and M. Soliman 1990. Sedimentation and rifting in the NW parts of the
Red Sea: A review. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, v. 6, p. 371-384.
Ramzy, M., B. Steer, F. Abu-Shadi, M. Schlorholtz, J. Mika, J. Dolson and M. Zinger 1996. Gulf of Suez
basin sequence models - Part B. Miocene sequence stratigraphy and exploration significance in
the central and the southern Gulf of Suez. In Egyptian general petroleum corporation. Thirteen
Exploration Conference, Cairo, Egypt, v. 2, p. 242-256.
Rider, M. 2004. The geological interpretation of well logs. Second Edition, Sutherland, Scotland, 280
p.
Salah, M.G. and A.S. Alsharhan 1997. The Miocene Kareem Formation in the southern Gulf of Suez,
Egypt: A review on stratigraphy and petroleum geology. Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 20, no.
3, p. 327-346.
Schaffer, B.L. 1987. The potential of calcareous nannofossils for recognizing Plio-Pleistocene climatic
cycles and sequence boundaries on the shelf: Gulf Coast Section SEPM Foundation, Eighth Annual
Research Conference, p. 142-145.
Schlumberger 1995. Well evaluation conference – Egypt. Houston, Texas, U.S.A, 87 p.
Seger, M.J. and J. Alexander 1993. Distribution of Plio-Pleistocene and modern coarse-grained deltas
south of the Gulf of Corinth, Greece. In L. Frostick and R. Steel (Eds.), Tectonic Controls and
Signatures in Sedimentary Successions. International Association of Sedimentologists, Special
Publication no. 20, p. 37-48.
Schütz, K.I. 1994. Structure and stratigraphy of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. In S. M. Landon (Ed.), Interior
Rift Basins. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, no. 59, p. 57-96.
Underhill, J.R. and M.A. Partington 1993. Jurassic thermal doming and deflation in the North Sea:
Implications of the sequence stratigraphic evidence. In J.R. Parker (Ed.), Petroleum Geology of
Northwest Europe. Proceedings Fourth Conference, p. 337-346.
Underhill, J.R. and M.A. Partington 1994. Use of genetic sequence stratigraphy in defining and
determining a regional tectonic control on the “Mid-Cimmerian Unconformity” implications for
North Sea basin development and the global sea level chart. In P. Weimer and H. W. Posamentier
(Eds.), 1993, Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy, Recent Developments and Applications. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, no. 58, p. 449-484.
Wescott, W.A., W.N. Krebs, J. Dolson, S.A. Karamat and D. Nummedahl 1996. Rift basin sequence
stratigraphy: Some examples from the Gulf of Suez. GeoArabia, v. 1, no. 2, p. 343-358.
Winn, R.D., P.D. Crevello and W. Bosworth 2001. Lower Miocene Nukhul Formation, Gebel el Zeit,
Egypt: Model for structural control on early synrift strata and reservoirs, Gulf of Suez. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 85, no. 10, p. 1871-1890.
Wu, S., A.W. Bally and C. Cramez 1990. Allochthonous salt, structure and stratigraphy of the north-
eastern Gulf of Mexico. Part ll: Structure. Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 7, p. 334-370.
Young, M.J., R.L. Gawthorpe and I.R. Sharp 2000. Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of a
transfer zone coarse-grained delta, Miocene Suez Rift, Egypt. Sedimentology, v. 47, p. 1081-1104.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Ahmed I.M. Abd El-Naby obtained a PhD in 2009 from Ain Shams University.
He was a member in the project entitled ”a field geologic study of southwestern
Sinai for development” During 1999-2002. Ahmed had a scholarship from the
Egyptian Mission Department to Bremen University in Bremen, Germany, during
the academic years 2007-2009, to carry out research on sequence stratigraphy
under supervision of Professor Jochen Kuss. He got also an internship from DEA
RWE Oil Company from November 2008 to January 2009. He has published two
articles in Neues Jahrebuch and Geologia Croatica.
zowail2000@yahoo.com

149
El-Naby et al.

Hussam Ghanem is currently working towards his PhD in Geochronology at

Bremen University. His research is focused on stratigraphy evolution of carbonate
platform (Cretaceous of Syria) and the interpretation of Syrian tectonic history through
Sedimentary analysis. He obtained a MSc in Geology and worked for a short time with
Petro- service Syria.
hussam_ghanem@yahoo.com

Mohamed Boukhary obtained a PhD in 1973 from Ain Shams University. He was
a fellow at Marie Curie University in Paris, France, during the academic year 1979-
1980, where he worked on the research field of larger foraminifera (Nummulitacea) with
Dr. Alphonse Blondeau. Mohamed served as Assistant Professor of Stratigraphy and
Micropaleontology at Qatar University from 1981 to 1985 and in 1987 he became a
Professor of Micropaleontology. He joined United Arab Emirates University in 1993,
and became Chairman of the Geology Department between 1996 and 1998. Mohamed
has been Chairman of the Geology Department at Ain Shams University from 2003 to
2007.
moboukhary@yahoo.com

Mohamed H. Abdel Aal obtained a PhD in 1988 from Ain Shams University. He was a
fellow at School of Geology and Geophysics Oklahoma University, USA, from February
to October 1997, where he worked on the research field of Seismic Stratigraphy and
amplitude versus offset (AVO). Mohamed served as Assistant Professor of Geophysics
at Ain Shams University from1994 to 2000 and in 2001 he became a Professor of
Geophysics. He has been Vice Dean of Post graduate studies and researches at Faculty of
education, Ain Shams University from 2005 up till now.
mabdelaal81@yahoo.com

Sebastian Lüning obtained his Geology/Palaeontology diploma from the University

of Göttingen, Germany, in 1994 working on stratigraphy and terrane movements in
northwest Thailand. He is a Senior Geologist with RWE Dea since 2007. His interest in
North Africa and Arabia began in 1994 when he commenced a study about Late Cretaceous
– Lower Tertiary strata of the Sinai Peninsula. He received his PhD in Geology in 1997
from the University of Bremen, Germany. Between 1997–2000 he was a post-doctoral
Fellow at the University of Wales, Aberystwyth, and the Royal Holloway University of
London, sponsored and based at the oil company LASMO plc, London. Here, he carried
out and co-ordinated a variety of projects, including a re-evaluation of the petroleum
potential of the Kufra Basin (southeast Libya) and North Africa-wide studies about
structural styles and Silurian and Frasnian ‘hot’ shales. Since 2000 he is continuing his black shale studies as
a post-doctoral Fellow at the University of Bremen, sponsored by the German Science Foundation (DFG) and
the petroleum-industry supported North Africa Research Group (NARG). Sebastian has been operating the
geoscience platforms www.northafrica.de and www.blackshale.com since 2001.
sebastian.luening@rwe.com

Jochen Kuss was awarded a PhD in 1983 by Erlangen University in Germany following
studies on Upper Triassic ramp deposits in the northern Calcareous Alps. From 1983 to
1991 he was an Assistant Professor at the Technical University of Berlin and undertook
sedimentologic and stratigraphic work in Egypt and Jordan. In 1991 Jochen joined the
University of Bremen. His main research interests are field work-based studies of marine
Cretaceous to Paleogene successions in North Africa and the Middle East. Methods used
include petrography, (micro) biostratigraphy, geochemistry, remote sensing and basin
modeling.
kuss@uni-bremen.de

Manuscript received July 1, 2009; Revised October 21, 2009

Accepted October 23, 2009; Pres-press version proof-read by authors April 12, 2010

150