Cambridge IGCSE™: Design & Technology 0445/12 October/November 2021
Cambridge IGCSE™: Design & Technology 0445/12 October/November 2021
Cambridge IGCSE™: Design & Technology 0445/12 October/November 2021
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2021 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level components and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Each question contains some marks which are awarded using the following performance description
tables.
Communication of ideas
5–6 Ideas are communicated with precision and clarity through the use of
sketches/accurate drawings and reasoned annotations linked to most of the
requirements.
Part (c) 3–4 Ideas are displayed with some clarity through sketches/clear drawings supported
by annotations referring to some of the requirements.
0 No creditable response.
Suitable designs
5–6 Creative solutions which fully meet the requirements. Designs showing most
aspects of construction detail.
3–4 Sensible solutions that mostly meet the requirements. Designs with moderate
Part (c)
construction detail.
1–2 Solutions do not meet many of the requirements. Simplistic designs with little
construction detail.
0 No creditable response
Quality of drawing
0 No creditable response.
Construction details
5–6 All construction detail clear with good annotations and/or additional detail
drawings as necessary.
Part (e)
3–4 Most construction may be obvious from overall views or with some annotation.
0 No creditable response.
Marking should be positive, rewarding achievement where possible but clearly differentiating across
the whole range of marks available.
In approaching the assessment process, examiners should look at the work and then make a ‘best fit’
judgement as to which level statement it fits. In practice the work does not always match one level
statement precisely so a judgement may need to be made between two or more level statements.
Once a ‘best fit’ level statement has been identified the following guide should be used to decide on a
specific mark:
• Where the candidate’s work convincingly meets the level statement, the highest mark should be
awarded
• Where the candidate’s work adequately meets the level statement, the most appropriate mark in
the middle of the range should be awarded
• Where the candidate’s work just meets the level statement, the lowest mark should be awarded
1(b) Accept drawings of any two methods 4 Maximum of 2 marks for each
of supporting an object – articulated drawing:
stand, easel style, picture frame style, Method (named or notes describe) –
blocks of materials shaped at an 1 mark
angle. Clear drawing – 1 mark
Innovative methods of supporting an Any other valid response
object. [2 × 2]
1(c) Any three suitable ideas. 12 At least three different ideas for
maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer.
Award up to 6 marks for
communication of ideas using the
‘Communication of ideas’ table.
1(f) Accept any two suitable specific 4 Each suitable specific material –
materials. [1 × 2] 1 mark
Generic terms such as wood, metal,
Accept any appropriate reason for plastic not accepted.
choice of each material [1 × 2] Appropriate reason for each material
– 1 mark
Materials must be appropriate for the
design shown in (e)
OR
2(b) Accept drawings of any two methods 4 Maximum of 2 marks for each
– use of plastic sheet insert, various drawing:
methods identified for example Methods (named or notes describe) –
window or plastic sheet as integral 1 mark
part of packaging, articulated Clear drawing – 1 mark
package which reveals the phone, Any other valid response
opening/‘cutouts’ [2 × 2]
2(c) Any three suitable ideas. 12 At least three different ideas for
maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer.
Award up to 6 marks for
communication of ideas using the
‘Communication of ideas’ table.
2(f) Accept any two suitable specific 4 Each suitable specific material –
materials. [1 × 2] 1 mark
Generic terms such as wood, metal,
Accept any appropriate reason for plastic not accepted.
choice of each material [1 × 2] Appropriate reason for each material
– 1 mark
Materials must be appropriate for the
design shown in (e)
OR
3(b) Accept drawings of any two ideas, 4 Maximum of 2 marks for each
including circular clamp, use of wing drawing:
nuts, nuts and bolts, jubilee clips, Method (named or notes describe) –
cable ties, lever locking system, 1 mark
straps, Velcro, end of handlebars, Clear drawing – 1 mark
front forks or other idea. [2 × 2] Any other valid response
3(c) Any three suitable ideas. 12 At least three different ideas for
maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer.
Award up to 6 marks for
communication of ideas using the
‘Communication of ideas’ table.
3(f) Accept any two suitable specific 4 Each suitable specific material –
materials. [1 × 2] 1 mark
Generic terms such as wood, metal,
Accept any appropriate reason for plastic not accepted.
choice of each material [1 × 2] Appropriate reason for each material
– 1 mark
Materials must be appropriate for the
design shown in (e)