Cambridge IGCSE ™: Design & Technology 0445/11
Cambridge IGCSE ™: Design & Technology 0445/11
Cambridge IGCSE ™: Design & Technology 0445/11
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Each question contains some marks which are awarded using the following performance description
tables.
Part (c)
5–6 Ideas are communicated with precision 5–6 Creative solutions which fully meet the
and clarity through the use of accurate requirements. Designs showing most
drawings and reasoned annotations aspects of construction detail.
linked to most of the requirements.
3–4 Ideas are displayed with some clarity 3–4 Sensible solutions that mostly meet the
through clear drawings supported by requirements. Designs with moderate
annotations referring to some of the construction detail.
requirements.
1–2 Simple drawings and limited 1–2 Solutions do not meet many of the
annotations show little understanding of requirements. Simplistic designs with
the requirements. little construction detail.
Part (e)
4 High standard of line quality, use of 5–6 All construction detail clear with good
colour and proportions. Appropriate annotations and/or additional detail
techniques used that show clearly all drawings as necessary.
detail.
2–3 Good line quality, use of colour and 3–4 Most construction may be obvious from
proportions. Most of the detail overall views or with some annotation.
presented.
1 Poor line quality and proportions. Little 1–2 A simplistic design; little or no detail of
detail presented. construction used.
Marking should be positive, rewarding achievement where possible but clearly differentiating across
the whole range of marks available.
In approaching the assessment process, examiners should look at the work and then make a ‘best fit’
judgement as to which level statement it fits. In practice the work does not always match one level
statement precisely so a judgement may need to be made between two or more level statements.
Once a ‘best fit’ level statement has been identified the following guide should be used to decide on a
specific mark:
• Where the candidate’s work convincingly meets the level statement, the highest mark should be
awarded
• Where the candidate’s work adequately meets the level statement, the most appropriate mark in
the middle of the range should be awarded
• Where the candidate’s work just meets the level statement, the lowest mark should be awarded.
1(b) Accept drawings of any two methods 4 Maximum of 2 marks for each
of folding/collapsing the device with drawing:
use of linkages, telescopic sections, Appropriate method – 1 mark
hinged pieces which can fold down, Clear drawing of an appropriate
parts which can slot together, knock method – 1 mark
down fittings. [22]
Any other valid response
1(c) Any three suitable ideas. 12 At least three different ideas for
maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer.
Award up to 6 marks for
communication of ideas using the
‘Communication of ideas’ table.
1(d) Award up to 6 marks for evaluation 8 Simple repeats of same points for
of the ideas: each idea not rewarded.
1(f) Accept any two suitable specific 4 Each suitable specific material –
materials. [12] 1 mark
Accept any appropriate reason for Generic terms such as wood, metal,
choice of each material [12] plastic not accepted.
OR
2(b) Accept drawings of any two methods 4 Maximum of 2 marks for each
of recording onto the device. e.g. drawing:
magnetic pieces, stickers, drywipe Method – 1 mark
polymer with detachable pen, Clear drawing of appropriate way –
notepad and pen, sliding pieces, 1 mark
Velcro pieces, pictograms on labels,
flip charts, accept tally charts, Any other valid response
electronic solutions [22]
2(c) Any three suitable ideas. 12 At least three different ideas for
maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer.
Award up to 6 marks for
communication of ideas using the
‘Communication of ideas’ table.
2(d) Award up to 6 marks for evaluation 8 Simple repeats of same points for
of the ideas: each idea not rewarded.
2(f) Accept any two suitable specific 4 Each suitable specific material –
materials. [12] 1 mark
Accept any appropriate reason for Generic terms such as wood, metal,
choice of each material [12] plastic not accepted.
OR
3(b) Accept drawings of any two methods 4 Maximum of 2 marks for each
of audible or visual alert eg. Buzzer, drawing:
bell, flashing lights, LED’s, flags, Method – 1 mark
counters, egg timer, sand timer, Clear drawing of an appropriate
windup mechanism with bell, water method – 1 mark
timer [22]
Any other valid response
3(c) Any three suitable ideas. 12 At least three different ideas for
maximum marks. Pro rata if fewer.
Award up to 6 marks for
communication of ideas using the
‘Communication of ideas’ table.
3(d) Award up to 6 marks for evaluation 8 Simple repeats of same points for
of the ideas: each idea not rewarded.
3(f) Accept any two suitable specific 4 Each suitable specific material –
materials. [12] 1 mark
Accept any appropriate reason for Generic terms such as wood, metal,
choice of each material [12] plastic not accepted.
3(g) Accept any suitable manufacturing 132 Process must be appropriate for
process. [11] design in (e).