Separation Axioms 0
Separation Axioms 0
SCIENCE-UNIVERSITY OF ANBAR
BY
SUPERVISOR
IRAQ-ANBAR
2017-2018
1
Definition (1-1) [1]
Let X be a non-empty set. Then the collection T of sub sets of X is called
Topology for X if T satisfies the following axioms:-
1- X and Ø ∈ T.
2- If A1 and A2 are any two sets in T. then A1 ∩ A2 ∈ T.
3- If {Aα: α ∈ ∆} be an arbitrary collection of sets in T then {Aα : α ∈ ∆} is in
T.
1- Ø. X
2- The intersection of finite collection of open sets is open.
3- Arbitrary (in finite) union of open sets is open.
Examples:
Let X = {a, b, c} consider the following collection of subset of X:
It's clear that each one of above collections or families are topology or X
T3 = {Ø, X, {a}, {c}} not topology on X because {a} ∈ T3 and {c} ∈ T3 But
{a} {c} = {a, c} T3.
2
Some types of topological space
First: Let X ≠Ø. The collection Ti = {Ø, X} is topology and it known indiscrete
topology.
(i.e) T* consist of Ø and all non-empty subsets of X whose complement are finite.
Fifth: Let X = R be all a real numbers and Let Tu be a family consisting of Ø and
all non-empty subsets G of R which have the following property:-
3
Comparison of Topologies
1) If every open set in T1 is open set in T2 then we write T1⊂T2 and say :
4
Definition (1-4) [6]
A topological space (X,T) is called door space . If every subset of X is either open
or closed.
5
Limit points and closure of sets
1- = Ø or D(Ø) = Ø
2- If A ⊆ B ⇒ D(A) ⊆ D(B)
3- D ( A ∩ B) ⊆ D(A) ∩ D(B)
4- D ( A B )= D(A) D(B)
6
Definition (1-11) [2]
Let (X,T) be a topological space and let A ⊆ X , then the intersection of all closed
sets of A is called the closure of A and denoted by Ā or C/(A).
1- = Ø and = X and =
2- If A ⊆ B ⇒ ⊆
3- ( ⊆( )
4- ( ⊆( ).
7
Interior, Exterior and Boundary of sets
1- Ø̊ = Ø , X̊ = X and (Å ) = Å .
2- If A ⊆ \b ⇒ Å ⊆ B̊ .
3- (A ∩ B) = Å ∩ B̊ .
9
Definition (1-15) [2]
A topological space (X, T) is said to be separable if and only if there exists a
countable dense subset A of X.
10
Remark (1-6) [6]
The mapping F is said to be continuous if and only if is continuous at each points of
X.
1- Open mapping if and only if the image under F of every T-open set in X is T*
- open in Y.
2- Closed mapping if and only if the image under F of every T-closed set in X is
T*-closed in Y.
3- Bi-continuous mapping if and only If F is open and continuous.
11
SEPARATION AXIOMS (T0, T1, T2, T3, , T4, AND T5)
A topological space X has the T0 property if there exists an open set which separates any two
distinct points: if x and y are distinct points of X, there exist an open set which contains one but
not the other. Let me be more explicit. A topological space X has the T0 property if, for any two
distinct points x and y in X, either there exists an open set M(x) containing x which does not
contain y, or there exists an open set N(y) containing y which does not contain x.
NOTE: that the space X is an open set containing x, but it contains y, and vice versa.
Here’s a picture of T0, showing an open set containing y that does not contain x. A T0 space is
sometimes, but rarely do I think, called Kolmogorov.
T0-Space
12
T1 property and spaces
A topological space X has the T1 property if x and y are distinct points of X, there exists an
open set M(x) which contains x but not y, and an open set N(y) which contains y but not x.
One crucial property of a T1 space is that points (singleton sets) are closed.
This time each point has an open set which contains it but not the other.
NOTE: that we did not assert that the two open sets do not intersect, merely that their
intersection contains neither x nor y. (That’s the next property.) Here’s a picture of T1, showing
open sets which intersect, but their intersection, as we require, does not contain x or y. A T1
space is sometimes, but again rarely, I think, called Frechet.
T1-spaces
13
T2 property and spaces
A topological space X has the T2 property if x and y are distinct points of X, there exist disjoint
open sets M(x) and N(y) containing x and y respectively. Here’s a picture of T2. A T2 space is
almost always, in my experience, called Hausdorff. One crucial property of a Hausdorff
space is that limit points are unique. (No, I haven’t defined a limit point. That’s another
interesting subject.)
T2-spaces
T3 and regular
Now we look at separating sets instead of points, still separating them by open sets of some
kind. First we separate a point and a closed set. (A set A in X is closed if its complement X – A
is open; the closure of A ( ), is the smallest closed set containing A.) A topological space X
has the T3 property if there exist disjoint open sets which contain any closed set and any point
14
not in the set: for any closed set B and any point , there exist disjoint open sets containing
x and B respectively.
Here’s T3. This time I use uppercase (“B”) and color to denote the closed set.
T3-spaces
It is crucial that the following set and topology (shown earlier as “an intermediate
example”) is T3 but not T1 (the problem is that the point is not closed):
X = {a, b, c} .
This is why and where we need to combine properties in order to get especially worthwhile
topological spaces. (Yes, we can study T3, T4, and T5 spaces per se. it is more fruitful to study
T3 + T1, T4 + T1, and T5 + T1)
(In fact, we can show that if a space is T0 and T3, then it is T2, hence T1, hence T1 and T3. this
means we could have defined a space as regular if it is T0 and T3. Of course, T1 and T3
immediately implies T0 and T3, so the two possible definitions of “regular” are equivalent.)
15
Although I used “normal” and “T4” in the introductory discussion, the alternative terminology
appears here as well, It applies to all subscripts 3 and higher. Where I say that a topological
space is regular iff it is T1 and T3 other people use regular to refer to my T3 property, and say a
topological space is T3 iff T1 and regular. Whereas the progression of the earlier separation
axioms kept tightening the requirements on the open sets whose existence we asserted, here we
just replaced a point by a closed set. That would be a refinement of the earlier property if points
themselves were closed sets. But that’s T1, and that’s why we want to study spaces which are
both T1 and T3.
T4 and normal
Now we separate two closed sets instead of a point and a closed set. A topological space X has
the T4 property if there exist disjoint open sets which contain any two disjoint closed sets: for
any disjoint closed sets A and B, there exist disjoint open sets containing A and B respectively.
T4-spaces
16
I should mention that a bad property of T4 spaces is that T4 is not hereditary: not every
subspace of T4 is T4. We say that a space is normal if it is T1 and T4. We still have the
analogous: not very subspace of a normal space is normal.
A topological space X has the T5 property if there exist disjoint open sets which contain any
two separated sets: for any separated sets A and B, there exist disjoint open sets containing A
and B respectively.
T5-spaces
17
We say that a space is completely normal if it is T5 and T1. We have the analogous: a space
is completely normal iff every subspace is normal. It corrects the problem with normal, too.
Consider the two open intervals A = (0, 1/2) and B = (1/2, 1) with the usual topology of the real
line. The sets do not intersect: , but the closed intervals, their closures, do:
A and B have the T5 property because A and B themselves are disjoint open sets. All of those
properties, T0 thru T5, asserted the existence of open sets, sometimes satisfying additional
conditions.
Given two disjoint subsets A and B of a space X, a Urysohn function for A and B is a
continuous function such that f (A) = 0 and f (B) = 1.
Urysohn’s Lemma, then, says that if A and B are disjoint closed subsets of a T4 space, then
there exists a Urysohn function for A and B.
A topological space X has the property if there exist a real-valued continuous function
which separates an open set from any point not in it: (i.e.) for each open set ⊂ and each x
not in U, there exist a Urysohn function f for x and U.
18
We say that a space is completely regular (or Tychonoff) if it is and T1.
The implications among the Ti properties (for i > ) are not so pretty.
Note that a Urysohn space was not in that list. Instead of the subsequence completely regular
regular
But there is no inclusion relationship between Urysohn and regular. We have two beautiful
inclusions, if we omit either regular or Urysohn, but not if we include both.
This is the second reason why I decided to follow Steen & Seebach and use T’s for the
properties and names for the combinations. If we did it the other way, with names for the
properties and T’s for the combinations, we could write
But then we’ve left Urysohn spaces out in the cold. Since the theorem is no longer pretty, I
chose to use the shorter Ti to denote a property, and write, for example, normal = T1 + T4.
19
And it is possible that I would not have been so struck by them without the lovely Ti Tj for,
i > j. (Adamson emphasizes that he chooses this convention because of the simplicity of that
statement.) Nevertheless, I have presented them the other way. The fact is, if you’re studying
someone else’s work, you may have to adopt their terminology as long as you’re there.
20