Lecture 7 - Axial Flow Turbines: - Discussion On Design Task 1 - Elementary Axial Turbine Theory

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Chalmers University of Technology

Lecture 7 – Axial flow turbines


• Discussion on design task 1
• Elementary axial turbine theory
– Velocity triangles
– Degree of reaction
– Blade loading coefficient, flow coefficient
• Problem 7.1
• Some turbine design aspects
– Choice of blade profile, pitch and chord
Chalmers University of Technology

Axial flow turbines


• Working fluid is accelerated
by the stator and decelerated
by the rotor
• Boundary layer growth and
separation does not limit
stage loading as in axial
compressor

• Expansion occurs in stator and in relative frame of rotor


Chalmers University of Technology

Elementary theory
Perfect
• Energy equation for control V32 V12 gas

q  w  h3   h1   h03  h01  c p  T03  T01 


volumes (again): 0   2   2
• Adiabatic expansion process h03 h01

(work extracted from system -


sign convention for added
work = +w)
– Rotor => -w = cp(T03-T02) <=>
w = cp(T02-T03)
– Stator => 0 = cp(T02-T01)
=> T02= T01
Chalmers University of Technology

How is the temperature drop related to the blade angles ?


• We study change of angular
momentum at mid of blade
(as approximation)
Chalmers University of Technology

Governing equations and assumptions


• Relative and absolute refererence
frames are related by: V  C  U
• We only study designs where:
– Ca2=Ca3
– C1=C3
• You should know how to extend the equations!!!
• We repeat the derivation of theoretical work used
for radial and axial compressors:
Rate of change of angular momentum 
 Cw3r3  Cw 2 r2  Theoretical torque 
Theoretica l work    Cw3r3  Cw 2 r2   Cw3U 3  C w 2U 2 
Assume change of
direction for relative
velocity

 Flow at constant radius  U  Cw3  Cw2   U  C w3  C w 2 
Chalmers University of Technology

Principle of angular momentum


Stage work output w:
w  U  C w 2  C w3  
U  Ca 2 tan  2  Ca 3 tan  3 

Ca constant:
w  U  Ca 2 tan  2  Ca 3 tan  3  
UCa  tan  2  tan  3 
Chalmers University of Technology
Chalmers University of Technology

Energy equation
Combine derived equations =>
w  UCa  tan  2  tan  3 
Energy equation:
w  c p T0, stage
We have a relation between temperature drop and blade angles!!! :

c p T0, stage  UCa  tan  2  tan  3  (7.3)


Exercise: derive the correct expression when 3 is small enough to allow 3
to be pointing in the direction of rotation.
Chalmers University of Technology

Dimensionless parameters
Blade loading coefficient, temperature drop coefficient:

c p T0, stage 2Ca



1 2
 Equation 7.3   tan  2  tan  3  (7.6)
U U
2
T2  T3
Degree of reaction: 
T1  T3
T2  T3
Exercise: show that this expression is equal to => 
when C3= C1 T01  T03
Chalmers University of Technology

 can be related to the blade angles!


C3 = C1 =>
c p Tstage  c p T0, stage  UC  tan  2  tan  3 
Relative to the rotor the flow does no work (in the relative frame
the blade is fixed). Thus T0,relative is constant =>

c p Trotor 
1 2

1 2

 V3  V2  Ca tan  3  tan  2
2
2

2
2 2

Exercise: Verify this by using the definition V2
T0,relative T 
of the relative total temperature: 2c p
Chalmers University of Technology

 can be related to the blade angles!


Plugging in results in definition of  =>

T2  T3 Ca
   tan  3  tan  2  (7.7)
T1  T3 2U
The parameter  quantifies relative amount of ”expansion” in
rotor. Thus, equation 7.7 relates blade angles to the relative
amount of expansion. Aircraft turbine designs are typically
50% degree of reaction designs.
Chalmers University of Technology

Dimensionless parameters
Finally, the flow coefficient:

Ca

U
Current aircraft practice (according
to C.R.S):
0.8    1.0
3.0    5.0
  0.5
Aircraft practice => relatively high
values on flow and stage loading
coefficients limit efficiencies
Chalmers University of Technology

Dimensionless parameters
Using the flow coefficient in 7.6 and 7.7 we obtain:

  2  tan  2  tan  3  (7.8)



   tan  3  tan  2  (7.9)
2
The above equations and 7.1 can be used to obtain the gas
and blade angles as a function of the dimensionless parameters

1 1  1
tan  2     2   tan  2  tan  2 
2 2  
1 1  1
tan  3     2   tan  3  tan  3 
2 2  
Chalmers University of Technology

Two simple homework exercises


• Exercise: show that the velocity triangles become symmetric for
 = 0.5. Hint combine 7.1 and 7.9

• Exercise: use the “current aircraft practice” rules to derive bounds


for what would be considered conventional aircraft turbine designs.
What will be the range for 3? Assume  = 0.5.
Chalmers University of Technology

Turbine loss coefficients:


Nozzle (stator) loss coefficients:
T2  T2
N  2
C2
2c p
p01  p02
YN 
p02  p2

Nozzle (rotor) loss coefficients:


T3  T3
R 
V22
2c p
p02,rel  p03,rel
YR 
p03,rel  p3
Chalmers University of Technology

Problem 7.1
Chalmers University of Technology

3D design - vortex theory


• U varies with radius
• Cw velocity component at stator
exit => static pressure increases
with radius => higher C2 velocity
at root
• Twist blades to take changing gas
angles into account
– Vortex blading
3D optimized blading
(design beyond free
vortex design)
Chalmers University of Technology

3D design in steam turbines


• Keep blade angles from
root to tip (unless rt/rr high)
• Cut cost
• Rankine cycle relatively
insensitive to component
losses
Chalmers University of Technology

Choice of blade profile, pitch and chord


• We want to find a blade that will minimize loss and perform the required
deflection
• Losses are frequently separated in terms:
Measured Grouped into one term
in cascade secondary loss s
       
Total  Profile  Tip clearance  Annulus  Secondary
Loss flow loss
Chalmers University of Technology

Choice of blade profile, pitch and chord


• As for compressors - profile families are used for thickness distributions.
For instance:
– T6, C7 (British types)
Chalmers University of Technology

Choice of blade profile, pitch and chord


• Velocity triangles determine gas angles not blade angles.
– arccos(o/s) should approximate outflow air angle:

• Cascade testing shows a rather large range of incidence angles for


which both secondary and profile losses are relatively insensitive
Chalmers University of Technology

Choice of blade profile, pitch and chord


• Selection of pitch chord:
– Blade loss must be minimized (the greater the required deflection the
smaller is the optimum s/c - with respect to λProfile loss)
– Aspect ratio h/c. Not critical. Too low value => secondary flow and tip
clearence effects in large proportion. Too high => vibration problems
likely. 3-4 typical. h/c < 1 too low.
– Effect on root fixing
• Pitch must not be too small to allow safe fixing to turbine disc rim

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy