Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    Oration: Judging Criteria Comments

    Uploaded by

    Amy Limboc Camerino
    This document contains the judging criteria for an oration competition. It includes sections on vocal delivery, emotional delivery, physical delivery, accuracy, and overall appeal. Judges are asked to rate contestants on a scale of 2 to 10 in each category and provide comments. They then calculate a final score, deducting points for exceeding the time limit. The document provides a structured way for judges to evaluate public speaking performances.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Oration: Judging Criteria Comments

    Uploaded by

    Amy Limboc Camerino
    41 views2 pages
    This document contains the judging criteria for an oration competition. It includes sections on vocal delivery, emotional delivery, physical delivery, accuracy, and overall appeal. Judges are asked to rate contestants on a scale of 2 to 10 in each category and provide comments. They then calculate a final score, deducting points for exceeding the time limit. The document provides a structured way for judges to evaluate public speaking performances.

    Original Description:

    criteria

    Original Title

    Oration

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains the judging criteria for an oration competition. It includes sections on vocal delivery, emotional delivery, physical delivery, accuracy, and overall appeal. Judges are asked to rate contestants on a scale of 2 to 10 in each category and provide comments. They then calculate a final score, deducting points for exceeding the time limit. The document provides a structured way for judges to evaluate public speaking performances.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    41 views2 pages

    Oration: Judging Criteria Comments

    Uploaded by

    Amy Limboc Camerino
    This document contains the judging criteria for an oration competition. It includes sections on vocal delivery, emotional delivery, physical delivery, accuracy, and overall appeal. Judges are asked to rate contestants on a scale of 2 to 10 in each category and provide comments. They then calculate a final score, deducting points for exceeding the time limit. The document provides a structured way for judges to evaluate public speaking performances.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    ORATION

    Judge’s Number Entry Name


    Place one of these numbers in each box below, then total carefully.
    10 — Outstanding in nearly every 4 — Basic weaknesses.
    detail. 2 — Unsatisfactory.
    8 — Minor defects.
    6 — Lacking finesse and/or interpretation.

    JUDGING CRITERIA COMMENTS


    Vocal Delivery
    Clarity of Speech: Degree to which words are clearly articulated and
    understood
    Diction and Pronunciation: Degree to which words are properly pronounced
    Consistent Volume Control: Degree to which contestant controls variation of pitch and
    audibility; projection
    Fluidity of Speech: Appropriate use of pauses, punctuation, intonation, modulation of
    tone

    Emotional Delivery
    Pathos: Degree of passion with which the speech is delivered
    Emotion: Degree of emotional expression; variation of emotional expression
    Element of Persuasion: Degree of conviction demonstrated in the delivery of
    the speech
    Engagement of Audience: Degree to which speaker is able to maintain the audience’s
    interest

    Physical Delivery
    Gestures, Poise and Posture: Appropriate use of hands, body, facial expressions;
    demeanor
    Mobility: Appropriate use of space in delivery
    Eye Contact: Degree to which visual connection with audience is maintained
    Tempo: Appropriate rhythm is established and maintained

    Accuracy
    Level of Memorization: Degree to which the entire speech is committed to
    memory
    Reflect mood of original occasion: Degree to which audience is transported to
    the appropriate time period
    Capture intention/conviction of original speaker: Degree of success in
    fulfilling the aim and purpose of the original speaker
    Level of Ownership: Degree to which contestant personalizes and owns the
    speech

    Overall Appeal
    SCORE
    Exceed Time Limit (-2)
    Final Score

    You might also like

    pFad - Phonifier reborn

    Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

    Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


    Alternative Proxies:

    Alternative Proxy

    pFad Proxy

    pFad v3 Proxy

    pFad v4 Proxy