Pier - RP1 PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 88

CONTENTS

Sl. No. Item Description Page

1.0 Input Data 1

2.0 Computation of volume of subsoil components 3

3.0 Carriageway Live Load Reactions and Moments: 4

4.0 Calculation of Horizontal forces: 9

5.0 Forces and Moments due to Wind Force 12

6.0 Forces and Moments due to Seismic Case 14

7.0 Combination for Verification of ultimate limit state as per Table 3.2 of IRC: 6-2014 20

Design of Pier Shaft for ULS Case 24

8.0 Combination for Verification of Serviceability Limit State as per Table 3.3 of IRC 6: 2014 26

Design of Pier Shaft for SLS Case 34

9.0 Combination for Calculation of Base pressures as per Table 3.4 of IRC : 6 -2014 38

Check for Pile capacity for pile cap 41

Design of pile cap for SLS Case 45

Design of working pile for SLS Case 48

10.0 Combination for calculation of Base pressure for Design of Foundation as per Table 3.4 52

Design of Pile Cap for ULS Case 57

Design of working pile for ULS Case 66

11.0 Design of Pier Cap in Transverse Direction as Cantilever for Maximum Reaction Case 72
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

Design of Pier & Pile Foundation

1.0 Span Arrangement = 18 x 20.000 + 1 x 37.24


Total Length of Bridge + 1 x 25.24 + 1 x 27.34
= 449.820 m
Left Span Right Span
C/C distance between Exp. Jt. = 27.340 20.000 m
Dist. between C/L's of Brg. & Exp. Jt. = 0.650 0.650 m Avg distance as it is varying from 0.5m to 0.7m
C/C distance between Bearing = 26.040 18.700 m
Expansion Gap = 0.04 m

Deck Width = 8.500 8.500 m


Carriageway Width = 7.500 7.500 m

Type of Superstructure = PSC girder RCC girder


No of Girders / Bearings = 3 3
C/C dist of bearing in trans direction = 2.500 2.500 m
Cantilever slab proj in trans direction = 1.750 1.750

Angle of Skew q = 0.00 Degrees Cos q Sin q Tan q


1.000 0.000 0.000

1.1 Salient Reduced Levels's (RL's)


Left Span Right Span
FRL (At Median inner edge) = 295.458 295.458 m
Camber = 2.500 2.500 %
RL at Outer Girder/Bearing Location = 295.396 295.396 m
Thickness of Wearing Course = 0.065 0.065 m
Depth of Superstructure = 2.065 2.065 m
Soffit Level at Outer Girder/Bearing = 293.266 293.266 m
Depth of Pedestal (Min) 0.200 0.200
Depth of Brg.+Ped at above location = 0.350 0.350 m
Pier Cap Top Level = 292.916 292.9155 m
Pier Cap Top Level (Vertical Rect. Portion) = 292.116 m
Pier Cap Bottom Level (Rect. Portion) = 291.316 m
LBL = 282.290 m
Pucca floor level = 282.290 m
RL of Pilecap Top Level = 281.690 m
Depth of Footing : = 1.500 m
Depth Effective = 1.388 m
RL Bottom of Pilecap = 280.190 m
Foundation Level taken for design = 280.190 m
Founding tip Lvl of Pile = 266.590 m
1.2 Dimensions of Substructure & Foundation

1.2.1 Bearings & Pedestals

No of Bearings & Pedestals 3 3


Type of Bearing = Free PTFE Fixed POT

L-L Dir. T-T Dir. Avg. Thick


Size of Bearing of LHS Span = 600 500 150
Size of Bearing of RHS Span 600 500 150

Size of pedestals of LHS Span = 0.900 0.800 0.294


Size of pedestals of RHS Span = 0.900 0.800 0.294
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
1.2.2 Pier Cap

Proj.of pier cap from cL of brg. in L-L dir = 0.650 m 0.650 m


Proj.of pier cap from cL of brg. in T-T dir = 0.500 m

L-L Dir. T-T Dir. Thickness


Uniform portion Top = 2.70 8.50 0.80
Trapezoidal portion Top = 2.70 8.50
0.80
Bottom = 1.50 3.50
Projection at top of pier = 0.00 0.00
Thick. of rectangular haunch at top of pier = 0.00 0.00
1.2.4 Pier

Type of Pier = RC Rectangular with cut water ends


Height of pier shaft including pier cap = 11.23 m

L-L Dir. T-T Dir.


Size of Pier at bottom = 1.500 3.500 m Excluding cut water ends
Thickness of pier (for hollow pier) = 0.000 0.000 m
Ht. of pedestal below RL 281.690 = 0.00 0.00 m
Proj. of pedestal at RL 281.690 = 0.00 0.00 m

Dia. of cutwater portion = 1.500 m

1.2.4 Pilecap
L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Footing = 4.30 7.30 m

Design speed of the vehicle = 30 kmph Radius of Curvature = 40 m


Superelevation = 2.5 %

1.3 Material Properties


Pier Cap Pier pile cap Pile
Grade of Concrete fck = M 35 M 35 M 35 M 35

Grade of Steel = S 500

Pile Capacity ( vertical ) Normal case = 300.00 t (Comp) Normal


Seismic case = 375.00 t (Increased by 25% as per Cl. 202.3 of IRC:6)
Pile Capacity ( horizontal ) Normal case = 20.00 t (Comp)
Seismic case 25.00 t (Increased by 25% as per Cl. 202.3 of IRC:6)
(As per Geotech Report)

This design caters for following load cases


Normal Case Longitudinal Seismic Case Transverse Seismic Case Wind Case
Case 1 : Max Reaction Case Case 5 : Max Reaction Case Case 9 : Max Reaction Case Case 13 : Max Reaction Case
Case 2 : Max Trans. Moment Cond'n Case 6 : Max Trans. Moment Cond'n Case 10 : Max Trans. Moment Cond'nCase 14 : Max Trans. Moment Cond'n
Case 3 : Max Long. Moment Cond'n Case 7 : Max Long. Moment Cond'n Case 11 : Max Long. Moment Cond'n Case 15 : Max Long. Moment Cond'n
Case 4 : One Span Dislodged Cond'n Case 8 : One Span Dislodged Cond'n Case 12 : One Span Dislodged Cond'nCase 16 : One Span Dislodged Cond'n

1.4 Loads From Superstructure

Reactions (KN) Eccentricities (m)


Left Span Right SpanLeft Span Right Span
DL Reaction = 1800.00 1400.00 0.000 0.000 Refer Section 2.0 of design sheets
SIDL Reaction = 452.78 331.22 0.000 0.000
FPLL Reaction = 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000
Wt of Platform at pier cap 0.00 0.000
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
CWLL Reaction = 880.31 KN (Max CWLL Reaction Case)
CWLL Reaction = 880.31 KN (Max Transverse Moment Case)
CWLL Reaction = 760.75 KN (Max Longitudinal Moment Case)

1.5 Seismic Load (Refer clause 222 of IRC:6-2000)

Seismic Zone = II (II / III / IV / V)


Type of Foundation soil strata = MS (Rocky or Hard Soil (HS) / Medium Soil (MS) / Soft Soil (SS))
Importance Factor = IB (Important Bridges (IB) / Others (OT))

Service Condition Span Dislodged Condition


L-L Dir. T-T Dir. L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Horizontal seismic coefficient = 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050
Vertical seismic coefficient = 0.033 0.033 0.033 0.033

2.0 Computation of volumes of Subsoil Components

2.1 Pedestal on either side of C/L of pier


Additional Height of Piercap 1.350 x 8.500 x 0.000 = 0.00 m^3
Volume of pedestals on LHS side = 0.900 x 0.800 x 0.294 x 3 = 0.635 m^3
0.0 + 0.6345 = 0.635 m^4
Volume of pedestals on RHS side = 0.900 x 0.800 x 0.294 x 3 = 0.635 m^3

2.2 Pier Cap

Volume of Rectangular portion of cap on one side= 8.500 x 2.700 x 0.800 = 18.360 m^3

Area of cap at RL 292.116 = 8.500 x 2.700 = 22.95 m^2


Area of cap at RL 291.316 = 3.500 x 2.700 = 9.45 m^2
Volume of Trapezoidal portion of cap = 8.500 x 2.700 x 1.50 = 12.568 m^3
(22.95 + 9.45 + (22.95 x 9.45) ^0.5 )) x 0.8 / 3
Total Volume of pier cap = 18.360 + 12.568 = 30.928 m^3

2.3 Pier Shaft

Height of pier shaft = 9.63 m

Height above LBL = 9.025 m ; Height below LBL = 0.600 m

Height above PFL = 9.025 m ; Height below PFL = 0.600 m

Area of pier shaft = 1.5 x 3.5 = 7.017 m^2

2.3.1 Volume of Pier shaft

Volume of pier shaft above LBL = = 63.333 m^3


Volume of pier shaft below LBL = = 4.210 m^3

2.4 Pedestal at bottom of pier

Length of pedestal along L-L Dir = 1.500 + 0.00 = 1.50 m


Length of pedestal along T-T Dir = 5.000 + 0.00 = 5.00 m
Volume of Pedestal = 1.500 x 5.000 x 0.00 = 0.00 m^3

2.5 Pier Footing


Total Volume of pile cap = 47.085 = 47.09 m^3

2.6 Volume of Overburden Earth over footing

Total Volume of earth above footing = 4.300 x 7.300 x 2.100 = 65.919 m^3
Net Volume of earth above footing = 65.919 -47.085 0.000 -4.210 = 14.624 m^3
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

2.7 SIDL Loads:

Effective Span (LHS) = 26.04 m ; Effective Span (RHS) = 18.70 m


Unit weight of RCC = 25.00 KN/m^3 ; Unit weight of PCC = 24.00 KNm^3

2.7.1 Weight of Footpath:

Width of Footpath = = 1.200 m


Avg. Height of raised Footpath = = 0.000 m

Weight of Footpath = 1.2 x 0 x 25 = 0.000 KN/m


2.7.2
2.7.2.1 Weight of RCC Kerb + Railing:

Width of Kerb = = 0.000 m


Height of Kerb = = 1.000 m

Weight of Kerb = 0 x 1 x 25 = 0.000 KN/m


Wt of RCC Railing / m = (0.175 * 0.2 * 2 * 2)+(0.25 * 0.275 * 0.86)) / 2 * 24 = 0.000 KN/m

Weight of Kerb + Railing = 0+0 = 0.000 KN/m

2.7.3 Weight of RCC Crash barrier on Footpath side

Volume of C/Barrier = = 0.419 m^3


Weight of RCC Crash barrier = 0.419 x 25 = 10.475 KN/m
Wt of pipe on c/barrier / m = = 0.200 KN/m

Weight of RCC Crash barrier+Pipe = 10.475 + 0.2 = 10.70 KN/m

2.7.4 Weight of RCC Crash barrier on Median side

Volume of C/Barrier = = 0.419 m^3


Weight of RCC Crash barrier = 0.419 x 25 = 10.475 KN/m
Wt of pipe on c/barrier / m = = 0.200 KN/m

Weight of RCC Crash barrier+Pipe = 10.475 + 0.2 = 10.70 KN/m

2.7.5 Footpath Live Load:

As per IRC: 6-2000, Clause 209.4


Intensity of FPLL P = P1 (for effective span <= 7.5m)
P' - (40 x L - 300) / 9 (for effective span > 7.5m and < 30.0m)
= (P' - 260 + 4800 / L) x (16.5 - W) / 15 (for effective span > 30m)
P' = = 500.00 kg/m^2
Intensity of FPLL for LHS Span = = 417.60 kg/m^2
Footpath Live Load = 4.176 x 1.2 = 5.020 KN/m

Intensity of FPLL for RHS Span = = 450.30 kg/m^2


Footpath Live Load = 4.503 x 1.2 = 5.410 KN/m

2.7.6 Weight of RCC Platform with Pier cap


Length of Platform (Along T-T) = = 0.000 m
Width of Platform (Along L-L) = = 2.700 m
Thickness of Platform = = 0.250 m

Live Load + Finishes = = 5.000 KN/m^2

Weight of RCC Platform = (0 x 2.7) x (0.25 x 25 + 5) = 0.00 KN


C.G of load from centre of pier = 0 + 4.25 = 4.25 m

2.8 Transverse Eccentricity of SIDL


Description of Load Load Length Total Ecc. wrt to Total Trans Total Net Ecc of
Recation centre Moment Recation on Reaction
(KN/m) (m) (KN) (m) (KNm) Pier (KN) (m)
C/Barrier Load on Outer side 10.70 23.67 253.27 4.00 1013.08
C/Barrier Load on Footpath side 10.70 23.67 253.27 -4.00 -1013.08
784.00 0.000
Wearing Coat Load on outer half side 5.85 23.67 138.47 1.88 259.63
Wearing Coat Load on Footpath half side 5.85 23.67 138.47 -1.88 -259.63

Page # 5
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

3.0 Carriageway Live Load Reactions and Moments:

3.1 Maximum Reaction Case

Left Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 27.34 m


Right Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 20.00 m
Left Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.65 m
Right Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.65 m
Left Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 26.04 m
Right Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.70 m

The train of loads are placed in such a way that CG of the load system is at the center line of pier to get the max reaction.

3.1.1 Class 70R Wheeled Vehicle:

1000.00
0.666 0.704
490.00 510.00
170.00 170.00
2.658 2.490

R3 R1 R2 R4

26.040 18.700

0.650 0.650

R1 = 490 x { 26.04 - ( 2.658 + 0.666 - 0.65 ) } / ( 26.04 ) = 439.69 KN


R3 = 490 - 439.69 = 50.31 KN

R2 = 510 x { 18.7 - ( 2.49 + 0.704 - 0.65 ) } / ( 18.7 ) = 440.62 KN


R4 = 510 - 440.62 = 69.38 KN

Total Reaction on pier = 439.69 + 440.62 = 880.31 KN

Longitudinal Moment = (440.62 - 439.69 ) * 0.65 = 0.61 KNm

Braking Force for LHS = 0.2 * 490 = 98.00 KN


Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 510 = 102.00 KN

3.1.2 1 Lane Class A:


554.00
0.708 3.592
27.00 27.00 272.00 282.00 0.00
68.00 114.00
1.100 24.500 4.500 1.432 24.070 -9.094

R3 R1 R2 R4

26.040 18.700

0.650 0.650

R1 = 272 x { 26.04 - ( 4.5 + 0.708 - 0.65 ) } / ( 26.04 ) = 217.00 KN


R3 = 272 + 54 - 217 = 109.00 KN

R2 = 282 x { 18.7 - ( 1.432 + 3.592 - 0.65 ) } / ( 18.7 ) = 216.04 KN


R4 = 282 + 0 - 216.04 = 65.96 KN

Total Reaction on pier = 217 + 216.04 = 433.04 KN

Longitudinal Moment = (216.04 - 217 ) * 0.65 = -0.62 KNm


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

Braking Force for LHS = 0.2 * 272 + 0.1 * 54 = 59.80 KN


Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 282 + 0.1 * 0 = 56.40 KN

3.1.3 2 Lane Class A:

For Class A 2 Lane the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 2 times that of Class A 1 Lane.

R1 = 2 x 217 = 434.00 KN
R3 = 2 x 109 = 218.00 KN

R2 = 2 x 216.04 = 432.08 KN
R4 = 2 x 65.96 = 131.92 KN

Total Reaction on pier = 434 + 432.08 = 866.08 KN

Longitudinal Moment = (432.08 - 434 ) * 0.65 -1.25 KNm

Braking Force for LHS = 0.2 * 272 + 0.1 * 54 = 59.80 KN


Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 282 + 0.1 * 0 = 56.40 KN

3.1.4 3 Lane Class A:

For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 2.7 times that of 1L Class A.
(As per clause 208 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)

R1 = 2.7 x 217 = 585.90 KN


R3 = 2.7 x 109 = 294.30 KN

R2 = 2.7 x 216.04 = 583.31 KN


R4 = 2.7 x 65.96 = 178.09 KN

Total Reaction on pier = 585.9 + 583.308 = 1169.21 KN

Longitudinal Moment = (583.308 - 585.9 ) * 0.65 -1.68 KNm

Braking Force for LHS = (0.2 * 272 + 0.05 * 544) * 0.9 + 0.1 * 54 = 78.84 KN
Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 282 + 0.05 * 564) * 0.9 + 0.1 * 0 = 76.14 KN

3.1.5 70RW + 1L Class A:

For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 0.9 times that of (70RW + 1L Class A)
(As per clause 208 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)

R1 = 0.9 * (217 + 439.69 ) = 591.02 KN


R3 = 0.9 * (109 + 50.31 ) = 143.38 KN

R2 = 0.9 * (216.04 + 440.62 ) = 590.99 KN


R4 = 0.9 * (65.96 + 69.38 ) = 121.81 KN

Total Reaction on pier = 591.021 + 590.994 = 1182.02 KN

Longitudinal Moment = (590.994 - 591.021 ) * 0.65 -0.02 KNm

Braking Force for LHS = (0.2 * 490 + 0.05 * 490) * 0.9 + 0.1 * 54 = 115.65 KN
Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 510 + 0.05 * 510) * 0.9 + 0.1 * 0 = 114.75 KN

3.1.6 Summary of Loads for Maximum Live Load Reaction case:

Longitud
Vertical Reaction Vertical Load on spans Braking Force Reaction
Details of .
(KN) Reaction (KN) (KN) at free
Load Cases Moment
LHS Span RHS Span (KN) LHS Span RHS Span LHS Span RHS Span end (KN)
KNm
70 RW 439.69 440.62 880.31 0.61 490.00 510.00 98.00 102.00 69.38
1 LCA 217.00 216.04 433.04 -0.62 326.00 282.00 59.80 56.40 65.96
2 LCA 434.00 432.08 866.08 -1.25 652.00 564.00 59.80 56.40 131.92
4 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
70RW+1 CLA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

3.2 Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case

To find the maximum longitudinal moment, the train of loads are placed in such a way that the starting load is placed at the
center line of the pier.

3.2.1 Class 70R Wheeled Vehicle:

1000.00

5.124 14.226

R1 R2 R4

18.700

0.650 0.650

R2 = 1000 x 14.226 / 18.7 = 760.75 KN


R4 = 1000 - 760.75 = 239.25 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 760.75 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 760.75 * 0.65 494.49 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 1000 = 200.00 KN

3.2.2 1 Lane Class A:


500.00

5.714 13.636

R1 R2 R4

18.700

0.650 0.650

R2 = 500 x 13.636 / 18.7 = 364.60 KN


R4 = 500 - 364.6 = 135.40 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 364.60 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 364.6 * 0.65 236.99 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 500 = 100.00 KN

2.2.3 2 Lane Class A:

For Class A 2 Lane the loads & the moments shall get multiplied by 2 times that of Class A 1 Lane.

R2 = 2 x 364.6 = 729.20 KN
R4 = 2 x 135.4 = 270.80 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 729.20 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 729.2 * 0.65 473.98 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = 0.2 * 500 = 100.00 KN

3.2.4 3 Lane Class A:

For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 2.7 times that of 1L Class A.
(As per clause 208 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
R2 = 2.7 x 364.6 = 984.42 KN
R4 = 2.7 x 135.4 = 365.58 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 984.42 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 984.42 * 0.65 639.87 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 500 + 0.05 * 1000) * 0.9 = 135.00 KN

3.2.5 70RW + 1L Class A:

For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 0.9 times that of (70RW + 1L Class A)
(As per clause 208 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)

R2 = 0.9 * (760.75 + 364.6 ) = 1012.82 KN


R4 = 0.9 * (239.25 + 135.4 ) = 337.19 KN

Total Reaction on pier = = 1012.82 KN

Longitudinal Moment = 1012.815 * 0.65 658.33 KNm

Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 1000 + 0.05 * 1000) * 0.9 = 225.00 KN

3.2.6 Summary of Loads for maximum longitudinal moment case:

Longitud
Vertical Reaction Vertical Load on spans Braking Force Reaction
Details of .
(KN) Reaction (KN) (KN) at free
Load Cases Moment
LHS Span RHS Span (KN) LHS Span RHS Span LHS Span RHS Span end (KN)
KNm
70 RW 0.00 760.75 760.75 494.49 1000.00 200.00 239.25
1 LCA 0.00 364.60 364.60 236.99 500.00 100.00 135.40
2 LCA 0.00 729.20 729.20 473.98 1000.00 100.00 270.80
3 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
70RW+1 CLA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2.7 Summary of Loads for minimum live load case:

Longitud
Vertical Reaction Vertical Load on spans Braking Force Reaction
Details of .
(KN) Reaction (KN) (KN) at free
Load Cases Moment
LHS Span RHS Span (KN) LHS Span RHS Span LHS Span RHS Span end (KN)
(KNm)
70 RW 0.00 239.25 239.25 155.51 1000.00 200.00 760.75
1 LCA 0.00 135.40 135.40 88.01 500.00 100.00 364.60
2 LCA 0.00 270.80 270.80 176.02 1000.00 100.00 729.20
3 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
70RW+1 CLA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3 CWLL Transverse Eccentricities

0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge
Crash Barrier 3.750 Crash
with Safety Kerb

8.500

Carriageway configuration of bridge


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
3.3.1 Class 70R Wheeled Vehicle:

0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 70RW
1.155 2.595

8.500

3.3.2 1Lane Class A Vehicle:

0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 1 LCA
2.450 1.300

8.500

3.3.3 2Lane Class A Vehicle:

0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 2 LCA
0.700 3.050

8.500

3.3.4 3Lane Class A Vehicle:

0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 2 LCA
0.000 -1.050 4.800

8.500

3.3.5 70 RW + 70RW:
cg of 70RW CG of 2 70RW
0.500 4.895 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 2 LCA
-1.145 2.450 1.300

8.500

3.3.6 Summary of Transverse Eccentricities:

Eccentricity from c/l


S. No. Class of Loading
of superstructure
1 Class 70 RW 1.155
2 1 LCA 2.450
3 2 LCA 0.700
4 3 LCA -1.050
2.450
5 1 LCA + Class 70RW
-1.145
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

4.0 Calculation of Horizontal force:

Left Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 26.04 m Right Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.70 m

LHS Span RHS Span


DL Reaction at free end (Max) = = 1800.00 1400.00 KN
DL Reaction at free end (Min) = = 1800.00 1400.00 KN
SIDL Reaction at free end = = 452.78 331.22 KN
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

4.1 Horizontal Force due to POT/PTFE:

H.F at Fixed bearing for POT/PTFE bearing = Fh - m (Rg + Rq) or Fh / 2 + m (Rg + Rq)

where Fh = Braking Force in t


Rg = DL + SIDL reaction at free end in t
Rq = CWLL reaction at free end in t
m = Coefficient of friction of movable bearing = 0.05
Coefficient of friction of movable bearing = 0.03
Horizontal Force for Elastomeric bearing = Fh / 2 + Vrtc

where Fh = Braking Force in t


Vrtc = Force due to elastomeric bearing property

4.3 Summary of Horizontal Forces due to Fixed POT/PTFE Bearing

Vertical
Longitudin Load on spans Braking Force Reaction Centrifug Trasverse Trasverse Horizontal Force(KN)
Details of Load Reactio
al Moment (KN) (KN) at free al Force Ecc. Moment Span
Cases n Service Seismic
(KNm) LHS-Span RHS-Span LHS-Span RHS-Span end (KN) (KN) (KN) (KNm) Dislodged
(KN)
Max Reaction Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 880.31 0.61 490.00 510.00 98.00 102.00 69.38 88.58 1.155 1016.76 185.67 54.15 112.64
Case 2 : 1 LCA 433.04 -0.62 326.00 282.00 59.80 56.40 65.96 53.86 2.450 1060.95 151.65 49.65 112.64
Case 3 : 2 LCA 866.08 -1.25 652.00 564.00 59.80 56.40 131.92 107.72 0.700 606.26 162.45 51.41 112.64
Case 4 : 4 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.050 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.040 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Min Reaction Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 239.25 155.51 0.00 1000.00 0.00 200.00 760.75 88.58 1.155 276.33 224.61 52.89 112.64
Case 2 : 1 LCA 135.40 88.01 0.00 500.00 0.00 100.00 364.60 44.29 2.450 331.73 169.41 49.23 112.64
Case 3 : 2 LCA 270.80 176.02 0.00 1000.00 0.00 100.00 729.20 88.58 0.700 189.56 176.18 48.39 112.64
Case 4 : 4 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.050 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.154 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Max Longitudinal Moment Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 760.75 494.49 0.00 1000.00 0.00 200.00 239.25 88.58 1.155 878.67 250.68 61.23 112.64
Case 2 : 1 LCA 364.60 236.99 0.00 500.00 0.00 100.00 135.40 44.29 2.450 893.27 180.87 52.89 112.64
Case 3 : 2 LCA 729.20 473.98 0.00 1000.00 0.00 100.00 270.80 88.58 0.700 510.44 199.10 55.73 112.64
Case 4 : 4 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.050 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.020 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
4.4 Summary of vertical effect due to bracking force

Braking Force Vertical Force(KN)

Appilcation
of load (m)

span (m)
effective
(KN) Service
Details of Load Cases

Span

Span
RHS
LHS
Normal Seismic

Max Reaction Case


Case 1 : 70 RW 3.33 26.04 98.00 102.00 13.04 6.52
Case 2 : 1 LCA 3.33 26.04 59.80 56.40 7.65 3.82
Case 3 : 2 LCA 3.33 26.04 59.80 56.40 7.65 3.82
Case 4 : 3 LCA 3.33 26.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
3.33 26.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Min Reaction case
Case 1 : 70 RW 3.33 26.04 0.00 200.00 25.58 12.79
Case 2 : 1 LCA 3.33 26.04 0.00 100.00 12.79 6.39
Case 3 : 2 LCA 3.33 26.04 0.00 100.00 12.79 6.39
Case 4 : 3 LCA 3.33 26.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
3.33 26.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max Longitudinal Moment Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 3.33 26.04 0.00 200.00 25.58 12.79
Case 2 : 1 LCA 3.33 26.04 0.00 100.00 12.79 6.39
Case 3 : 2 LCA 3.33 26.04 0.00 100.00 12.79 6.39
Case 4 : 3 LCA 3.33 26.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
3.33 26.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

6.0 Forces and Moments due to Seismic Case

As per IRC: 6-2014, no calculation of seismic force is required for structures up to 10m and for structures in Zone -II & Zone -III, if the
two conditions stated below are satisfied simultaneously.

i) The span is less than 15 meter.


ii) The total length of the bridge is less than 60 meter.

All other bridges shall be designed for seismic forces.

Zone = II
Span Length = 27.34 > 15
Total Length = 449.82 > 60

Hence the bridge is to be designed for Seismic Forces.

As per clause 222.3, Since the bridge is not in the Zone-IV or Zone -V, no vertical component of the seismic force is
required to be considered in the design. (Refer clause 222.3 of IRC:6)
AV = 0 x Ah

Horizontal seismic force Feq = Ah x (D.L + b x L.L) (Refer Cl. 222.5 of IRC:6-2000)

Where Feq = Seismic Force to be resisted


D.L = DL from the superstructure & substructure upto the scour level
L.L = Live Load
b = The multiplying factor for the Live Load as per Table 1 of IRC :6-2000
= 0.2 (when the seismic force is acting perpendicular to traffic)
= 0 (when the seismic force is acting parallel to traffic)

Tables as per IRC:6, for Zone Factor, Importance Factor and Foundation Strata:

Zone Zone Type Importance Foundation Notation


Number Factor of Bridge Factor Strata
II 0.10 Important 1.20 Rock/Hard Soil HS
III 0.16 Others 1.00 Medium Soil MS
IV 0.24 Soft Soil SS
V 0.36
F

Fxe

F x e / (E x I)
F x (e + l) / (E x I)

where F = Force applied at centre of mass of superstructure to produce 1mm deflection


e = Distance between the centre of mass of superstructure to top of bearing =

Ah = Horizontal Seismic Coeff. = (z/2) x (Sa/g) / (R/I)

where Z = Zone Factor = II = 0.10


I = Importance Factor = IB = 1.20
R = Reduction Factor = = 3.00

Foundation strata = MS

Type of Pier Rectangular


= with Semi Circular Ends = RC
=
Dist. of top of pier cap where 1mm deflection is req. = L = 10.726 m

Grade of Concrete = = M 35
Youngs Modulus E = 5700 x (35) ^ 0.5 / 1000 = 3.250E+07 KN/m^2

Min DL & LL has been considered for calculating fundamental time period on conservative side as the same coefficient is used for all max
load, min load and max longitudinal moment cases.
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

6.1.1 Seismic Coefficient in Longitudinal Direction in Service Condition:

Size of Rectangular Pier = 1.50 x 3.50 m


Moment of Inertia I = 3.5 x 1.5 ^ 3 / 12 = 0.98 m^4

Moment of Inertia of Pier I = = 0.98 m^4


Dist. from c.g of mass of superstructure to top of brg = = 1.326 m

F req. to produce 1mm deflection at F = F x l² x (3 x e + 2 x l) / (6 x E x I) = 65617.25 KN/m


top of pier F = = 65.62 KN/mm

Fundamental time period T = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5


where D = D1 + D2
D1 = DL + SIDL from the superstructure = 3984.00 KN
D2 = Live Load = 0.00 KN

T = = 0.4928 sec

Average Response Acceleration Coefficient for 5% damping


For Medium Soil Sa/g = 2.50 (0.00 <= T <= 0.55)
= 1.36 / T (0.55 <= T <= 4.00)
=
Taking Sa / g = = 2.500

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah = (0.1/ 2 ) x 2.5 / (3 / 1.2) = 0.050

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = Ah*2/3 or 0 = 0.033

6.1.2 Seismic Coefficient in Transverse Direction in Service Condition:

Size of Rectangular Pier = 1.50 x 3.50 m


Moment of Inertia I = 1.5 x 3.5 ^ 3 / 12 = 5.36 m^4

Moment of Inertia of Pier I = = 5.36 m^4


Dist. from c.g of mass of superstructure to top of brg = = 1.326 m

F req. to produce 1mm 'd' at top of pier F = F x l² x (3 x e + 2 x l) / (6 x E x I) = 357249.5 KN/m


F = = 357.25 KN/mm

Fundamental time period T = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5


where D = D1 + D2
D1 = DL + SIDL from the superstructure = 3984.00 KN
D2 = Live Load = 440.16 KN

T = = 0.223 sec

Average Response Acceleration Coefficient for 5% damping


For Medium Soil Sa/g = 2.50 (0.00 <= T <= 0.55)
= 1.36 / T (0.55 <= T <= 4.00)
=
Taking Sa / g = = 2.500

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah = (0.1/ 2 ) x 2.5 / (3 / 1.2) = 0.050

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = Ah*2/3 or 0 = 0.033


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
6.2.1 Seismic Coefficient in Longitudinal Direction in Span Dislodged Condition:

Dia of Solid Pier D = 1.50 m


Moment of Inertia I = pi() x 1.5 ^ 4 / 64 = 0.25 m^4

Moment of Inertia of Pier I = = 0.98 m^4


Dist. from c.g of mass of superstructure to top of brg = = 1.326 m

F req. to produce 1mm deflection at F = F x l² x (3 x e + 2 x l) / (6 x E x I) = 65617.25 KN/m


top of pier F = = 65.62 KN/mm

Fundamental time period T = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5


where D = D1 + D2
D1 = DL + SIDL from the superstructure = 1731.22 KN
D2 = Live Load = 0.00 KN

T = = 0.3249 sec

Average Response Acceleration Coefficient for 5% damping


For Medium Soil Sa/g = 2.50 (0.00 <= T <= 0.55)
= 1.36 / T (0.55 <= T <= 4.00)
=
Taking Sa / g = = 2.500

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah = (0.1/ 2 ) x 2.5 / (3 / 1.2) = 0.050

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = Ah*2/3 or 0 = 0.033

6.2.2 Seismic Coefficient in Transverse Direction in Span Dislodge Condition:

Dia of Solid Pier D = 1.50 m


Moment of Inertia I = pi() x 1.5 ^ 4 / 64 = 0.25 m^4

Moment of Inertia of Pier I = = 0.98 m^4


Dist. from c.g of mass of superstructure to top of brg = = 1.326 m

F req. to produce 1mm 'd' at top of pier F = F x l² x (3 x e + 2 x l) / (6 x E x I) = 65617.25 KN/m


F = = 65.62 KN/mm

Fundamental time period T = 2 x (D / (1000 x F)) ^0.5


where D = D1 + D2
D1 = DL + SIDL from the superstructure = 1731.22 KN
D2 = Live Load = 0.00 KN

T = = 0.325 sec

Average Response Acceleration Coefficient for 5% damping


For Medium Soil Sa/g = 2.50 (0.00 <= T <= 0.55)
= 1.36 / T (0.55 <= T <= 4.00)
=
Taking Sa / g = = 2.500

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient Ah = (0.1/ 2 ) x 2.5 / (3 / 1.2) = 0.050

Vertical Seismic Coefficient Av = Ah*2/3 or 0 = 0.033


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

5.0 Forces and Moments due to Wind Force

Left Span Right Span


C/C distance between Exp. Jt. = 27.340 20.000 m
Dist. between C/L's of Brg. & Exp. Jt. = 0.650 0.650 m
C/C distance between Bearing = 26.040 18.700 m
Dist. between girders. (c/c) 2.500 2.500
FRL (At Median inner edge) = 295.458 295.458 m
Camber = 2.500 2.500 %
RL at Outer Girder/Bearing Location = 295.396 295.396 m
Thickness of Wearing Course = 0.065 0.065 m
Depth of Superstructure = 2.065 2.065 m
Soffit Level at Outer Girder/Bearing = 293.266 293.266 m
LBL = 282.290 m
Depth of Footing = 1.500 m
Founding Level = 280.190 m

Angle of Skew q = 0.00 Degrees Cos q Sin q Tan q


1.000 0.000 0.000

Type of super structure LHS = RCC Girder


Type of super structure RHS = RCC Girder

Height of Crash barrier = 1.00 m


DL LL
Wind velocities & Pressures (Refer Table 4: of IRC:6 -2014) LHS RHS
G= 2 2 2
Basic speed Height Velocity Pressure Pz x G x CD CD = 1.95 1.95 1.2
(m/s) LHS RHS
33 16.27 29.89 45.45 177.25 177.25

47 16.27 42.57 92.19 359.54 359.54

Wind Loads on super structure


LHS RHS
width of the deck = 8.50 8.50
Lift co-effiecent (CL) = 0.75 0.75

5.1 Wind Force on exposed area of the superstructure (Normal to the wind dir) (Refer clause 212.2 & 212.3)

Exposed area of superstructure = ( Area of Deck with C/Barrier for Left Span + Area of Deck with C/Barrier for Right Span)
A1 = ((27.34 x (2.065 + 0.065 + 1) 42.79 m^2
A2 ((20 x (2.065 + 0.065 + 1) 31.30 m^2

Wind Force for the above area A1 = = 15383.67 N


= 15.38 KN
Wind Force for the above area A2 = 11253.60 N
11.25 KN

Depth of Superstructure + C/Barrier (A1) = = 3.13 m


Acting at @ from Founding Level (A1) = = 14.64 m

Depth of Superstructure + C/Barrier (A2) = = 3.13 m


Acting at @ from Founding Level (A2) = = 14.64 m

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis A1 = 15.383 x sin 0 = 0.00 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis A1 = 15.383 x cos 0 = 15.38 KN

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis (A2) = 11.253 x sin 0 = 0.00 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis (A2) = 11.253 x cos 0 = 11.25 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL (A1) = 15.383 x 0.25 = 3.846 KN


Wind load Transverse WL (A1) = 15.383 x 0.25 = 0.00 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL A2 = 0 x 0.25 + 14.64 x 0.25 = 2.813 KN


Wind load Transverse WL A2 = 0 x 0.25 + 14.64 x 0.25 = 0.00 KN

Plan area for the vertical load A1 = (27.34X8.5)/2 = 116.195 m^2


Wind vertical load A1 = = 16067.98 N/m^2
= = 16.07 KN
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Plan area for the vertical load A2 = (20X8.5)/"2 = 85.0 m^2
Wind vertical load A2 = = 11754.2 N/m^2
= = 11.75 KN
5.2 Wind Force on the Live Load (normal to the wind direction)

Wind load on live load = No Live Load is considered (Refer clause 209.3.7 of IRC:6- 2010)
= 0 x 3 x 92.189 x 1.95 x 1.2/1000 = 0.000 KN

Acting at @ from Founding Level = = 16.77 m

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis = 0 x sin 0 = 0.00 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis = 0 x cos 0 = 0.00 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL = = 0.00 KN


Wind load Transverse WL = = 0.000 KN

5.2.1 Span Dislodged Condition

5.2.1.1 Wind Force on exposed area of the superstructure (Normal to the wind dir)

Exposed area of superstructure A2 = = 31.30 m^2


Wind Force for the above area A2 = = 11253.60 N
= 11.25 KN
Wind force perpendicular to pier axis A2 = 11.253 x sin 0 = 0.00 KN
Wind force parallel to the pier axis A2 = 11.253 x cos 0 = 11.25 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL A2 = 11.253 x 0.25 = 2.813 KN


Wind load Longitudinal WL A2 = 11.253 x 0.25 = 0 KN

Plan area for the vertical load A2 = (20X8.5)/2 = 85 m^2


Wind vertical load A2 = = 11754.192 N/m^2
= = 11.75 KN
5.2.2 Wind Loads on sub structure
For piercap For Pier
Shape = Rectangular
Rectangular
Width (b) = 1.5 1.5
Depth (t) = 8.5 3.5
t/b = 5.667 2.333333
Height = 1.6 9.626
H/b = 1.067 6.417
CD = 0.8 0.900
Gust factor (G) = 2 2

5.2.3 Service Condition

5.2.3.1 Wind force on the sub structure

Exposed area of Piercap = 4.32


Wind load on piercap = 318.608 N
= 0.319 KN
Acting at @ from Founding Level = 11.926 m

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis = 0.318 x sin 0 = 0 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis = 0.318 x cos 0 = 0.319 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL = = 0.08 KN


Wind load Transverse WL = = 0.000 KN

Exposed area of Pier = 5241.97 N


= 5.242 KN

Acting at @ from Founding Level = 6.613 m

Wind force perpendicular to pier axis = 5.242 x sin 0 = 0.000 KN


Wind force parallel to the pier axis = 5.241 x cos 0 = 5.242 KN

Wind load Longitudinal WL = = 1.31 KN


Wind load Transverse WL = = 0.000 KN
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

6.3.1 Longitudinal Seismic Case with Maximum Live Load

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0500


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0334

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ ML @ ML @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 280.19 m 281.69 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 0.00 60.12 293.266 -0.650 -39.08 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 140.00 46.76 293.266 0.650 30.39 1830.57 1620.57
SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 0.00 15.12 293.266 -0.650 -9.83 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 33.12 11.06 293.266 0.650 7.19 433.09 383.40
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 20% of LL 87.94 0.00 2.94 293.266 -0.650 -1.91 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 20% of LL 88.12 0.00 2.94 293.266 0.650 1.91 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 -0.650 -0.34 10.21 9.02
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 0.650 0.34 10.21 9.02
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 22.95 15.33 292.516 0.000 0.00 282.87 248.45
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 15.71 10.49 291.716 0.000 0.00 181.07 157.50
Pier Shaft upto Ground Level 63.333 25.00 1583.33 79.17 52.88 286.803 0.000 0.00 523.51 404.76
Total Loads & Moments in LWL Case 292.53 218.71 -11.32 3271.52 2832.72

6.3.2 Longitudinal Seismic Case with Minimum Live Load :

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0500


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0334

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ ML @ ML @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 280.19 m 281.69 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 0.00 60.12 293.266 -0.650 -39.08 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 140.00 46.76 293.266 0.650 30.39 1830.57 1620.57
SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 0.00 15.12 293.266 -0.650 -9.83 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 33.12 11.06 293.266 0.650 7.19 433.09 383.40
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 20% of LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 20% of LL 152.15 0.00 5.08 293.266 0.650 3.30 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 -0.650 -0.34 10.21 9.02
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 0.650 0.34 10.21 9.02
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 22.95 15.33 292.516 0.000 0.00 282.87 248.45
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 15.71 10.49 291.716 0.000 0.00 181.07 157.50
Pier Shaft upto Ground Level 63.333 25.00 1583.33 79.17 52.88 286.803 0.000 0.00 523.51 404.76
Total 292.53 217.92 -8.02 3271.52 2832.72
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

6.3.3 Longitudinal Seismic Case with Span Dislodged Condition:

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0500


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0334

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ ML @ ML @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 280.19 m 281.69 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 70.00 46.76 293.266 0.650 30.39 915.29 810.29
SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 16.56 11.06 293.266 0.650 7.19 216.54 191.70
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 293.266 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 -0.650 -0.34 10.21 9.02
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 0.650 0.34 10.21 9.02
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 22.95 15.33 292.516 0.000 0.00 282.87 248.45
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 15.71 10.49 291.716 0.000 0.00 181.07 157.50
Pier Shaft upto Ground Level 63.333 25.00 1583.33 79.17 52.88 286.803 0.000 0.00 523.51 404.76
Total 205.97 137.59 37.58 2139.69 1830.73

6.4.1 Transverse Seismic Case with Maximum Live Load

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0500


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0334

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ MT @ MT @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 280.19 m 281.69 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 90.00 60.12 294.814 -0.650 -39.08 1316.18 1181.18
DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 70.00 46.76 294.814 0.650 30.39 1023.70 918.70
SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 22.64 15.12 295.708 -0.650 -9.83 351.31 317.35
SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 16.56 11.06 295.708 0.650 7.19 256.99 232.15
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 295.708 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 295.708 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 20% of LL 87.94 4.40 2.94 296.658 -0.650 -1.91 72.41 65.81
CWLL Rection : Right Span 20% of LL 88.12 4.41 2.94 296.658 0.650 1.91 72.56 65.95
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 -0.650 -0.34 10.21 9.02
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 0.650 0.34 10.21 9.02
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 22.95 15.33 292.516 0.000 0.00 282.87 248.45
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 15.71 10.49 291.716 0.000 0.00 181.07 157.50
Pier Shaft upto Ground Level 63.333 25.00 1583.33 79.17 52.88 286.803 0.000 0.00 523.51 404.76
Total 327.42 218.71 -11.32 4101.02 3609.89
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

6.4.2 Transverse Seismicl Case with Minimum Load

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0500


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0334

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ MT @ MT @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 280.19 m 281.69 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 90.00 60.12 294.814 -0.650 -39.08 1316.18 1181.18
DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 70.00 46.76 294.814 0.650 30.39 1023.70 918.70
SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 22.64 15.12 295.708 -0.650 -9.83 351.31 317.35
SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 16.56 11.06 295.708 0.650 7.19 256.99 232.15
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 295.708 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 295.708 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 20% of LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 296.658 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 20% of LL 152.15 7.61 5.08 296.658 0.650 3.30 125.28 113.87
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 -0.650 -0.34 10.21 9.02
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 0.650 0.34 10.21 9.02
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 22.95 15.33 292.516 0.000 0.00 282.87 248.45
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 15.71 10.49 291.716 0.000 0.00 181.07 157.50
Pier Shaft upto Ground Level 63.333 25.00 1583.33 79.17 52.88 286.803 0.000 0.00 523.51 404.76
Total 0.00 326.22 217.92 -8.02 4081.33 3592.00

6.4.3 Transverse Seismic Case with Span Dislodged Condition:

Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.0500


Vertically Seismic Coefficient = 0.0334

Item Volume Unit Dead Fh Fv CG of eL at c.g. ML @ Mt @ MT @


Weight Load Force of Footing CG of 280.19 m 281.69 m
(m3) (kN/m3) (KN) (KN) (KN) RL in (m) (m) Footing (KNm) (KNm)
DL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 294.814 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 70.00 46.76 294.814 0.650 30.39 1023.70 918.70
SIDL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 295.708 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 16.56 11.06 295.708 0.650 7.19 256.99 232.15
FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 0.00 0.00 295.708 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.00 0.00 295.708 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Left Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 296.658 -0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL Rection : Right Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 296.658 0.650 0.00 0.00 0.00
Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 -0.650 -0.34 10.21 9.02
Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.79 0.53 293.062 0.650 0.34 10.21 9.02
Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 22.95 15.33 292.516 0.000 0.00 282.87 248.45
Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 15.71 10.49 291.716 0.000 0.00 181.07 157.50
Pier Shaft upto Ground Level 63.333 25.00 1583.33 79.17 52.88 286.803 0.000 0.00 523.51 404.76
Total 205.97 137.59 37.58 2288.56 1979.59
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
7.0 Combination for Verification of ultimate limit state as per Table 3.2 of IRC: 6-2014

7.0.1Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Pier shaft Base

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont.Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.


Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
Snow load Reaction: left span (with
2c 70R wheeled LL is present) 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with
2d 70R wheeled LL is present) 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 0.00 11.576 11.576 2149.22 0.00
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment case 0.00 250.68 0.00 11.576 11.576 2901.75 0.00
4k Maximum Transverse Moment case 0.00 185.67 0.00 11.576 11.576 2149.22 0.00
4k i Centrifugal force 88.58 0.00 11.576 11.576 1025.39 0.00
4l Span Dislodged 112.64 0.00 11.576 11.576 1303.86 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 11.576 11.576 626.81 0.00
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 0.00 11.576 11.576 708.77 0.00
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 11.576 11.576 626.81 0.00
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 0.00 11.576 11.576 1303.86 0.00
4Q Thermal Loads 48.60 11.576 11.576 562.57 0.00

5 Loads from Substructure


5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 -0.65 -10.31
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.65 10.31
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LBL 63.333 25.00 1583.33 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LBL 4.210 25.00 105.26 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2493.51 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Wind forces
6a Wind Force On super structure A1 16.07 3.85 15.38 13.141 13.141 50.54 202.15
Wind Force On super structure A2 11.75 2.81 11.25 13.141 13.141 36.97 147.88
6b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 15.268 15.268 0.00 0.00
6c Windforce on piercap 0.08 0.32 10.426 10.426 0.83 3.32
6d Windforce on pier 1.31 5.24 5.113 5.113 6.70 26.80
27.82 8.05 32.20 95.04 380.15

7 Seismic Forces
7a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 218.71 292.53 0.00 2832.72 0.00
7b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -217.915 292.53 0.00 2832.72 0.00
7c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -137.591 205.97 0.00 1830.73 0.00
7d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 218.714 0.00 327.42 0.00 3609.89
7e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -217.915 0.00 326.22 0.00 3592.00
7f Trans. seismic with One Span Dislodged -137.591 0.00 205.97 0.00 1979.59
8 Snow Loads
Snow load Reaction: Left span (No
8a Live Load) 0.00 -0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
Snow load Reaction: Right span (No
Live Load) 0.00 0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00 0.00


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 10090.148 418.624 28.978 4390.691 1867.272
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 9910.808 516.139 28.978 6260.300 1660.134
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 10090.148 418.624 28.978 4390.691 1867.272
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1.5+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.9+(5*1) 4249.774 176.205 28.978 3166.624 342.135
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.15+(6*1.5) 8786.376 12.074 48.297 -315.111 570.224
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1.35) 8786.376 12.074 48.297 -315.111 570.224
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1.35) 8786.376 12.074 48.297 -315.111 570.224
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4g+4h+4l)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 4266.468 12.074 48.297 1267.850 570.224

COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 7137.746 205.690 0.000 2042.400 762.569
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(6*)+(5*1) 7048.076 254.447 0.000 2977.204 659.000
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(6*)+(5*1) 7137.746 205.690 0.000 2042.400 762.569
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.75+(4Q*)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*+(5*1) 4224.734 84.480 0.000 2103.192 0.000

COMBINATION 3
Vertical Longi. Trans
Long. H.F Trans.
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case Load Moment moment
(Kn) H.F (Kn)
(Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(5*1)+(7a*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0. 6751.997 458.491 147.337 4138.088 1827.804
3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(5*1)+(7b*1.25*1.5) 6531.602 459.907 146.799 4253.256 1792.133

c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case


(1a+1b+2a+2b)*+(2c+2d)*+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(6*)+(5*)+(7b*(r1+r2*0.3+r3* 6555.514 458.491 146.799 4138.088 1819.751
0.3)*1.25*)
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(5*1)+(7c*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1 4162.819 22.528 0.000 4132.164 890.817
.5)
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(5*1)+(7d*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0. 6751.997 151.329 491.124 1163.733 5618.193
3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(6*)+(5*1)+(7e*(r1+r2*0.3+ 6531.602 152.745 489.330 1278.901 5563.731
r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(6*)+(5*1)+(7e*(r1+r2*0.3+r 6555.514 151.329 489.330 1163.733 5591.350
3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(5*1)+(7f*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1. 4193.777 68.872 154.480 1797.981 1484.696
5)

COMBINATION 1 (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)


Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.3)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 10387.357 7.245 28.978 -306.650 2210.548
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 10253.146 7.245 28.978 592.117 2055.534
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 10387.357 7.245 28.978 -370.955 2210.548
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*1.5+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.9+(5*1) 4249.774 7.245 28.978 1210.827 342.135
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

COMBINATION 2 (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)


Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) ` (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.3+4i*0)*0.75+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 7286.351 0.000 0.000 -306.271 934.207
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*0.75+(6*)+(5*1) 7219.245 0.000 0.000 143.113 856.700
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*0.75+(6*)+(5*1) 7286.351 0.000 0.000 -306.271 934.207
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*0.75+(4Q*)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*+(5*1) 4224.734 0.000 0.000 1125.294 0.000

COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)

Case - (i) Wind Load as Leading Load

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.15+(6*1.5) 8786.376 12.074 48.297 -315.111 570.224


DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT:
CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE:
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB RS GMS 0

7.1 Summary of Loads and Moments at the Base of Pier Shaft:

Case No Case Description P ML MT MR


(kN) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 10090.15 4390.69 1867.27 4771.25
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 9910.81 6260.30 1660.13 6476.68
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10090.15 4390.69 1867.27 4771.25
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4249.77 3166.62 342.13 3185.05
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 8786.38 -315.11 570.22 651.50
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8786.38 -315.11 570.22 651.50
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 8786.38 -315.11 570.22 651.50
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4266.47 1267.85 570.22 1390.18
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7137.75 2042.40 762.57 2180.12
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7048.08 2977.20 659.00 3049.27
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7137.75 2042.40 762.57 2180.12
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4224.73 2103.19 0.00 2103.19
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 6752.00 4138.09 1827.80 4523.79
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 6531.60 4253.26 1792.13 4615.40
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 6555.51 4138.09 1819.75 4520.54
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 4162.82 4132.16 890.82 4227.10
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 6752.00 1163.73 5618.19 5737.45
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 6531.60 1278.90 5563.73 5708.83
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 6555.51 1163.73 5591.35 5711.17
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 4193.78 1797.98 1484.70 2331.75
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 10387.36 -306.65 2210.55 2231.72
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 10253.15 592.12 2055.53 2139.12
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10387.36 -370.95 2210.55 2241.46
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4249.77 1210.83 342.13 1258.24
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7286.35 -306.27 934.21 983.13
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7219.24 143.11 856.70 868.57
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7286.35 -306.27 934.21 983.13
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4224.73 1125.29 0.00 1125.29
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 8786.38 -315.11 570.22 651.50
CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Project:
Roadway pier 14/02/17
Title: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS 0

7.2 Analysis of Rectangular Sections under Axial Load and Bi-Axial Bending moments

Length of section along Traffic direction: 1.500 m


Length of section across Traffic direction: 3.500 m

Effective Cover 0.1 m


End Spacing 0.085 m

No of bars along Traffic direction (one side) 10 Nos.


Diameter of bar 0.032 m

No of bars across Traffic direction (one side) 30 Nos.


Diameter of bar 0.032 m

Code of Practise IRC


Modular Ratio m 6.5

Grade of Concrete M 35
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for Axial Compression 8.75 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for bending Compression 11.67 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Compression 205 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Tension 240 N/mm

2
Area of Concrete 5.2500 m
2
Area of Steel =2×3.14/4×(0.032^2×10+0.032^2×30)×1e6 64340 mm OK
Percentage of Steel 1.23 %

Area of concrete to resist axial load only


2
= #REF! 1153160 mm
2
Area of Steel = 0.8% of above 9225 mm

2
Min. Area of steel on each face= 0.0012*Ac 6300.0 mm OK

2
Total Area of vertical reinforcement = 0.0024*Ac 12600 mm
2
= 0.04*Ac 210000 mm Steel Prov > Min reqd
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

8.0 Combination for Verification of Serviceability Limit State as per Table 3.3 of IRC 6: 2014

8.0.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Pier shaft
Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
2c Snow load Reaction: left span (with 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
2d Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 0.00 11.576 11.576 2149.22 0.00
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 0.00 250.68 0.00 11.576 11.576 2901.75 0.00
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 0.00 185.67 0.00 11.576 11.576 2149.22 0.00
4k i Centrifugal force 88.58 0.00 11.576 11.576 1025.39 0.00
4l Span Dislodged 112.64 0.00 11.576 11.576 1303.86 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 11.576 11.576 626.81 0.00
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 0.00 11.576 11.576 708.77 0.00
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 11.576 11.576 626.81 0.00
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 0.00 11.576 11.576 1303.86 0.00

4Q Thermal Loads
For Normal case
From Left Span 48.60 11.576 11.576 562.57 0.00
From Right Span -48.60 11.576 11.576 -562.57 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00

For One span dislodged condition -48.60 562.57 0.00


5 Loads from Substructure
5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 -0.65 -10.31
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.65 10.31
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 63.333 25.00 1583.33 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LWL 4.210 25.00 105.26 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5i Footing (pile cap) 47.085 25.00 1177.13 0.00 0.00
5j Volume of earth above Footing 14.62 20.00 292.47 0.00 0.00
2493.51 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Wind forces
6a Wind Force On super structure A1 16.07 3.85 15.38 13.141 13.141 50.54 202.15
Wind Force On super structure A2 11.75 2.81 11.25 13.141 13.141 36.97 147.88
6b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 15.268 15.268 0.00 0.00
6c Windforce on piercap 0.08 0.32 11.926 11.926 0.95 3.80
6d Windforce on pier 1.31 5.24 6.613 6.613 8.67 34.66
27.82 8.05 32.20 97.12 388.49

Snow load Reaction: Left span (No


7a Live Load) 0.00 -0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
Snow load Reaction: Right span (No
Live Load) 0.00 0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

COMBINATION 1 (RARE COMBINATION)


LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(6*0.6)+(4Q*0.6)+(5*1) 7374.517 279.082 19.319 2894.477 1249.852
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 7254.957 344.092 19.319 4140.883 1111.761
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 7374.517 279.082 19.319 2894.477 1249.852
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.6+(5*1) 4241.428 -24.330 19.319 1521.109 233.094
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*) 6505.336 8.049 32.198 -241.890 388.491
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*1) 6505.336 8.049 32.198 -241.890 388.491
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*1) 6505.336 8.049 32.198 -241.890 388.491
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4g+4h+4l)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*1) 4252.557 -21.111 32.198 1559.958 388.491
Case - (iii) Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(6*0.6)+(5*) 7165.568 177.301 32.198 1716.152 1151.059
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 7075.898 226.058 32.198 2650.957 1047.490
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 7165.568 177.301 32.198 1716.152 1151.059
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4g+4h+4l)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 4252.557 -43.770 32.198 1746.136 388.491

COMBINATION 2 (FREQUENT COMBINATION)


Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.5)+(5* 7151.657 209.714 16.10 2090.96 956.814
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.5)+(5*1) 7061.987 258.472 16.10 3025.77 853.245


c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.5)+(5*1) 7151.657 209.714 16.10 2090.96 956.814


d): One Span Dislodged Case

(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.5+(5*1) 4238.645 -20.275 16.10 1455.14 194.245


Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.6)+(5*0. 6494.207 29.130 19.319 0.545 233.094
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.6)+(5*0.15) 6494.207 29.130 19.319 0.545 233.094


c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.6)+(5*0.15) 6494.207 29.130 19.319 0.545 233.094


d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.6+(5*1) 4241.428 -19.470 19.319 1464.852 233.094
Case - (iii) Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.5)+(5*0. 6667.487 50.017 16.099 242.053 397.597
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.5)+(5*0.15) 6643.575 92.179 16.099 491.334 369.979


c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.5)+(5*0. 6667.487 50.017 16.099 242.053 397.597
15)
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.5+(5*1) 4238.645 -25.135 16.099 1511.397 194.245
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
COMBINATION 3 (Quasi - Permanent Combination)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Normal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b)*1+(5*1) 6477.513 0.000 0.000 -339.013 0.000
b): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b)*1+(5*1) 4224.734 0.000 0.000 1125.294 0.000

COMBINATION 1 (RARE COMBINATION) (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1+(6*0.6)+(4Q 7572.656 4.830 19.319 -237.084 1478.703
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.3+4j*0)*1+(4Q 7483.182 4.830 19.319 362.095 1375.360
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.3+4k*0)*1+(4Q*0*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5 7572.656 4.830 19.319 -237.084 1478.703
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g 4241.428 4.830 19.319 1183.567 233.094

COMBINATION 2 (FREQUENT COMBINATION) (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Live Load as Leading Load Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*0+4b*0+4i*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6* 7300.262 4.025 16.099 -257.710 1128.452
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*0+4d*0+4j*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6*0.5)+(5*1 7233.156 4.025 16.099 191.674 1050.945
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*0+4f*0+4k*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6 7300.262 4.025 16.099 -257.710 1128.452
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*0+4h*0+4l*0)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.5+(5*1) 4238.645 4.025 16.099 1173.85 194.245

COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*) 6505.336 8.049 32.198 -241.890 388.491


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

8.1 Combination for Verification of Serviceability Limit State as per Table 3.3 of IRC 6: 2014

8.1.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
2c Snow load Reaction: left span (with 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
2d Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 88.58 13.076 13.076 2427.73 1158.26
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 0.00 250.68 88.58 13.076 13.076 3277.77 1158.26
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 0.00 185.67 88.58 13.076 13.076 2427.73 1158.26
4l Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.076 13.076 0.00 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 88.58 13.076 13.076 708.04 1158.26
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 88.58 13.076 13.076 800.61 1158.26
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 88.58 13.076 13.076 708.04 1158.26
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 0.00 13.076 13.076 1472.82 0.00

4Q Thermal Loads
For Normal case
From Left Span 48.60 13.076 13.076 635.47 0.00
From Right Span -48.60 13.076 13.076 -635.47 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00

For One span dislodged condition -48.60 635.47 0.00


5 Loads from Substructure LBL Case
5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 -0.65 -10.31
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.65 10.31
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 63.333 25.00 1583.33 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LWL 4.210 25.00 105.26 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5i Footing (pile cap) 47.085 25.00 1177.13 0.00 0.00
5j Volume of earth above Footing 14.62 20.00 292.47 0.00 0.00
3963.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Wind forces
6a Wind Force On super structure A1 16.07 3.85 15.38 14.641 14.641 56.31 225.22
Wind Force On super structure A2 11.75 2.81 11.25 13.14 13.14 36.97 147.88
6b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 16.768 16.768 0.00 0.00
6c Windforce on piercap 0.08 0.32 11.926 11.926 0.95 3.80
6d Windforce on pier 1.31 5.24 6.613 6.613 8.67 34.66
27.82 8.05 32.20 102.89 411.57
Snow load Reaction: Left span (No
7a Live Load) 0.00 -0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
Snow load Reaction: Right span (No
Live Load) 0.00 0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

COMBINATION 1 (RARE COMBINATION)


LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(6*0.6)+(4Q*0.6)+(5*1) 8844.1 190.500 19.319 2151.055 2421.960
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 8724.6 255.510 19.319 3494.976 2283.869
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 8844.1 190.500 19.319 2151.055 2421.960
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1+(4Q*0.6)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.6+(5*1) 5711.0 -24.330 19.319 1568.310 246.940
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*) 7974.9 8.049 32.198 -236.121 411.566
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*1) 7974.9 8.049 32.198 -236.121 411.566
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*1) 7974.9 8.049 32.198 -236.121 411.566
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4g+4h+4l)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*1) 5722.2 -21.111 32.198 1609.467 411.566
Case - (iii) Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(6*0.6)+(5*) 8635.2 144.082 32.198 1543.972 2042.832
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 8545.5 192.840 32.198 2551.913 1939.263
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 8635.2 144.082 32.198 1543.972 2042.832
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4g+4h+4l)*0.75+(4Q*1)+(6*0.6)+(5*1) 5722.2 -43.770 32.198 1822.498 411.566

COMBINATION 2 (FREQUENT COMBINATION)


Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.5)+(5*1) 8621.3 143.277 16.10 1533.68 1837.049
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.5)+(5*1) 8531.6 192.035 16.10 2541.62 1733.480


c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.5)+(5*1) 8621.3 143.277 16.10 1533.68 1837.049


d): One Span Dislodged Case

#REF! 5708.2 -20.275 16.10 1494.47 205.783


Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.6)+(5*0.1 7963.8 29.130 19.319 40.457 246.940
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.6)+(5*0.15) 7963.8 29.130 19.319 40.457 246.940


c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6*0.6)+(5*0.15) 7963.8 29.130 19.319 40.457 246.940


d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.6+(5*1) 5711.0 -19.470 19.319 1504.763 246.940
Case - (iii) Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.5)+(5*0.1 8137.1 41.159 16.099 198.100 640.787
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.5)+(5*0.15)
8113.2 83.321 16.099 466.884 613.169
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(6*0.5)+(5*0.1 8137.1 41.159 16.099 198.100 640.787
5)
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.6)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.5+(5*1) 5708.2 -25.135 16.099 1558.021 205.783
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

COMBINATION 3 (Quasi - Permanent Combination)


Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Normal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b)*1+(5*1) 7947.1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
b): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b)*1+(5*1) 5694.3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

COMBINATION 1 (RARE COMBINATION) (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1+(6*0.6)+(4Q*0 9042.255 4.830 19.319 -233.622 1492.549
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*1+(4Q*0*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5*1 8952.781 4.830 19.319 365.556 1389.206
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*1+(4Q*0*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5*1 9042.255 4.830 19.319 -233.622 1492.549
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*1+(4Q*0*0.6)+(6a+6b+6c+6 5711.027 4.830 19.319 1187.029 246.940

COMBINATION 2 (FREQUENT COMBINATION) (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5) 8769.861 4.025 16.099 -254.825 1139.990
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6*0.5)+( 8702.755 4.025 16.099 194.558 1062.483
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5) 8769.861 4.025 16.099 -254.825 1139.990
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h*0+4l*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.5+(5*1) 5708.245 4.025 16.099 1176.74 205.783

COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)

Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(4Q*0.6)+(6*1)+(5*) 7974.935 4.830 19.319 -236.121 411.566


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

8.2 Summary of Loads and Moments : (For SLS Condition)

Case No Case Description P ML MT MR


Shaft Pile Cap Shaft Pile Cap Shaft Pile Cap Shaft Pile Cap
Combination 1 - Rare Combination (kN) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7374.52 8844.12 2894.48 2151.05 1249.85 2421.96 3152.80 3239.28
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7254.96 8724.56 4140.88 3494.98 1111.76 2283.87 4287.53 4175.03
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7374.52 8844.12 2894.48 2151.05 1249.85 2421.96 3152.80 3239.28
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4241.43 5711.03 1521.11 1568.31 233.09 246.94 1538.86 1587.63
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 6505.34 7974.93 -241.89 -236.12 388.49 411.57 457.64 474.49
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 6505.34 7974.93 -241.89 -236.12 388.49 411.57 457.64 474.49
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 6505.34 7974.93 -241.89 -236.12 388.49 411.57 457.64 474.49
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4252.56 5722.16 1559.96 1609.47 388.49 411.57 1607.60 1661.26
Case - (ii) Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7165.57 8635.17 1716.15 1543.97 1151.06 2042.83 2066.43 2560.67
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7075.90 8545.50 2650.96 2551.91 1047.49 1939.26 2850.41 3205.15
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7165.57 8635.17 1716.15 1543.97 1151.06 2042.83 2066.43 2560.67
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4252.56 5722.16 1746.14 1822.50 388.49 411.57 1788.83 1868.39
Combination 2 - Frequent Combination
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7151.66 8621.26 2090.96 1533.68 956.81 1837.05 2299.48 2393.10
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7061.99 8531.59 3025.77 2541.62 853.24 1733.48 3143.77 3076.49
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7151.66 8621.26 2090.96 1533.68 956.81 1837.05 2299.48 2393.10
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4238.65 5708.24 1455.14 1494.47 194.25 205.78 1468.05 1508.58
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 6494.21 7963.81 0.55 40.46 233.09 246.94 233.09 250.23
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 6494.21 7963.81 0.55 40.46 233.09 246.94 233.09 250.23
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 6494.21 7963.81 0.55 40.46 233.09 246.94 233.09 250.23
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4241.43 5711.03 1464.85 1504.76 233.09 246.94 1483.28 1524.89
Case - (ii) Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 6667.49 8137.09 242.05 198.10 397.60 640.79 465.48 670.71
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 6643.57 8113.17 491.33 466.88 369.98 613.17 615.06 770.69
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 6667.49 8137.09 242.05 198.10 397.60 640.79 465.48 670.71
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4238.65 5708.24 1511.40 1558.02 194.25 205.78 1523.83 1571.55
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Combination 3 - Quasi - Permanent Combination
Case - (i)
a): Normal Case 6477.51 7947.11 -339.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 339.01 0.00
a): One Span Dislodged Case 4224.73 5694.33 1125.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 1125.29 0.00
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7572.66 9042.3 -237.08 -233.62 1478.70 1492.55 1497.59 1510.72
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7483.18 8952.8 362.09 365.56 1375.36 1389.21 1422.23 1436.50
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7572.66 9042.3 -237.08 -233.62 1478.70 1492.55 1497.59 1510.72
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4241.43 5711.0 1183.57 1187.03 233.09 246.94 1206.30 1212.44
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7300.26 8769.86 -257.71 -254.83 1128.45 1140.0 1157.51 1168.12
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7233.16 8702.76 191.67 194.56 1050.94 1062.5 1068.28 1080.15
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7300.26 8769.86 -257.71 -254.83 1128.45 1140.0 1157.51 1168.12
d): One Span Dislodged Case 4238.65 5708.24 1173.85 1176.74 194.25 205.8 1189.82 1194.60
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 6505.3 7975 -241.9 -236.1 388.5 411.6 457.64 474.49
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Project: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

Title: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS 0

8.3 Analysis of Rectangular Sections under Axial Load and Bi-Axial Bending moments

ML
T
end spacing

LT MT x Longitudinal
y Transverse

L
LL

Length of section along Traffic direction: 1.500 m


Length of section across Traffic direction: 3.500 m

Effective Cover 0.1 m


End Spacing 0.085 m

No of bars along Traffic direction (one side) 10 Nos.


Diameter of bar 0.032 m

No of bars across Traffic direction (one side) 30 Nos.


Diameter of bar 0.032 m

Code of Practise IRC


Modular Ratio m 10

Grade of Concrete M 35
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for Axial Compression 8.75 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for bending Compression 16.80 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Compression 400 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Tension 400 N/mm

2
Area of Concrete 5.2500 m
2
Area of Steel =2×3.14/4×(0.032^2×10+0.032^2×30)×1e6 64340 mm
Percentage of Steel 1.23 %

Area of concrete to resist axial load only


2
= 737.5 / 8.75 842802 mm
2
Area of Steel = 0.8% of above 6742 mm

2
Min. Area of steel on each face=0.0012*Ac 6300.0 mm OK

2
Total Area of vertical reinforcement = 0.0024*Ac 12600 mm
2
= 0.04*Ac 210000 mm Steel Prov > Min reqd
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Project: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

Title: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS 0

Combi - 1 Load P ML MT ex ey s CONCRETE s ST COMP s ST TENSION Remark


Rare Case No t t t m m N/mm2 N/mm2 N/mm2
Case (i) - a) 101 737 289 125 0.392 0.169 3.62 33.29 -9.59 100%
b) 102 725 414 111 0.571 0.153 4.85 43.33 -28.78 100%
c) 103 737 289 125 0.392 0.169 3.62 33.29 -9.59 100%
d) 104 424 152 23 0.359 0.055 1.79 16.50 -2.34 100%
Case (ii) - a) 105 651 -24 39 -0.037 0.060 1.38 13.52 0.00 100%
b) 106 651 -24 39 -0.037 0.060 1.38 13.52 0.00 100%
c) 107 651 -24 39 -0.037 0.060 1.38 13.52 0.00 100%
d) 108 425 156 39 0.367 0.091 1.87 17.28 -3.18 100%
Case (iii) - a) 109 717 172 115 0.239 0.161 2.64 24.76 -0.19 100%
b) 110 708 265 105 0.375 0.148 3.31 30.46 -7.26 100%
c) 111 717 172 115 0.239 0.161 2.64 24.76 -0.19 100%
d) 112 425 175 39 0.411 0.091 2.04 18.66 -5.18 100%
frequent comb 2
Case (i) - a) 113 715 209 96 0.292 0.134 2.83 26.41 -1.99 100%
b) 114 706 303 85 0.428 0.121 3.58 32.70 -10.92 100%
c) 115 715 209 96 0.292 0.134 2.83 26.41 -1.99 100%
d) 116 424 146 19 0.343 0.046 1.72 15.93 -1.64 100%
Case (ii) - a) 117 649 0 23 0.000 0.036 1.18 11.77 0.00 100%
b) 118 649 0 23 0.000 0.036 1.18 11.77 0.00 100%
c) 119 649 0 23 0.000 0.036 1.18 11.77 0.00 100%
d) 120 424 146 146 0.345 0.345 2.18 20.17 -6.38 100%
Case (iii) - a) 121 667 24 40 0.036 0.060 1.41 13.83 0.00 100%
b) 122 664 49 37 0.074 0.056 1.55 15.07 0.00 100%
c) 123 667 24 40 0.036 0.060 1.41 13.83 0.00 100%
d) 124 424 151 19 0.357 0.046 1.77 16.31 -2.13 100%
Quasi comb 3
Case (i) - a) 125 648 -34 0 -0.052 0.000 1.32 12.96 0.00 100%
Rare comb1 b) 126 422 113 0 0.266 0.000 1.43 13.38 0.00 100%
(congestion
factor)Case (i) -
a) 127 757 -24 148 -0.031 0.195 1.87 18.26 0.00 100%
b) 128 748 36 138 0.048 0.184 1.90 18.51 0.00 100%
c) 129 757 -24 148 -0.031 0.195 1.87 18.26 0.00 100%
d) 130 424 118 23 0.279 0.055 1.54 14.37 0.00 100%
frequent comb2
(congestion
factor)Case (i) -
a) 131 730 -26 113 -0.035 0.155 1.74 16.96 0.00 100%
b) 132 723 19 105 0.026 0.145 1.66 16.28 0.00 100%
c) 133 730 -26 113 -0.035 0.155 1.74 16.96 0.00 100%
d) 134 424 117 19 0.277 0.046 1.52 14.20 0.00 100%
COMBINATION
1 (considering
snow load with
135 651 -241.9 388 -0.372 0.597 4.20 38.74 -19.94 100%
no Live load
case)
Design of Column for ULS Condition:
Details of Column

ly Bars in
Y direction

Bars in X direction
lx
= 1.50 m
= 3.50 m

Cover to Reinforcement = 0.1 m

No of bars in X direction = 30
Diameter of bars in X direction = 0.032 m
Area =3.14×0.032^2/4×30 = 0.02413 m2

No of bars in Y direction = 10
Diameter of bars in Y direction = 0.032 m
Area =3.14×0.032^2/4×10 = 0.00804 m2

Grade of Concrete = 35
gm = 1.5

Grade of Steel = 500


gm = 1.15

Area of Column =1.500×3.500 = 5.250 m2


Area of Steel =2×(0.00804+0.02413) = 0.0643 m2
Percentage steel = 1.23 %
Puz =((0.67×35×5.250/1.5)+(500×0.06434/1.15))×1000
= 110049 KN

Interaction
S . No P My Mx a Mux Muy ratio
Long. Trans.
KN KN m KN m KN m KN m
1 10090 4391 1867 1.000 10668 47884 0.27
2 9911 6260 1660 1.000 10577 47643 0.29
3 10090 4391 1867 1.000 10668 47884 0.27
4 4250 3167 342 1.000 7317 39913 0.13
5 8786 -315 570 1.000 9950 46142 0.05
6 8786 -315 570 1.000 9950 46142 0.05
7 8786 -315 570 1.000 9950 46142 0.05
8 4266 1268 570 1.000 7324 39939 0.11
9 7138 2042 763 1.000 9020 43920 0.13
10 7048 2977 659 1.000 8965 43793 0.14
11 7138 2042 763 1.000 9020 43920 0.13
12 4225 2103 0 1.000 7302 39879 0.05
13 6752 4138 1828 1.000 8794 43396 0.30
14 6532 4253 1792 1.000 8668 43087 0.31
15 6556 4138 1820 1.000 8679 43123 0.31
16 4163 4132 891 1.000 7262 39792 0.23
17 10387 -307 2211 1.000 10830 48276 0.20
18 6752 1164 5618 1.000 8794 43396 0.67
19 6532 1279 5564 1.000 8668 43087 0.67
20 6556 1164 5591 1.000 8679 43123 0.67
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

8.4 Summary of Base Pressure

No. of Piles = 6
Area of Footing A = 4.300 x 7.300 = 31.39 m^2
Section Modulus along L-L Axis ZL = 7.300 x 4.300 ^2/6 = 22.50 m^3
Section Modulus along T-T Axis ZT = 4.300 x 7.300 ^2/6 = 38.19 m^3

Base Pressure = P/A ± ML / ZL ± MT / ZT


Load Load Case Description Vertical Long. Transvers
Long. H. F Tran. H. F Tota l HF HF per
Case Load P Moment e Moment
(Kn) (Kn) (KN) Pile (KN)
No (Kn) 'ML' 'ML'

Combination 1 - Rare Combination


Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 8844.12 190.50 19.32 2151.05 2421.96 191.48 31.91
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8724.56 255.51 19.32 3494.98 2283.87 256.24 42.71
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 8844.12 190.50 19.32 2151.05 2421.96 191.48 31.91
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5711.03 -24.33 19.32 1568.31 246.94 31.07 5.18
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7974.93 8.05 32.20 -236.12 411.57 33.19 5.53
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7974.93 8.05 32.20 -236.12 411.57 33.19 5.53
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7974.93 8.05 32.20 -236.12 411.57 33.19 5.53
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5722.16 -21.11 32.20 1609.47 411.57 38.50 6.42
Case - (ii) Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 8635.17 144.08 32.20 1543.97 2042.83 147.64 24.61
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8545.50 192.84 32.20 2551.91 1939.26 195.51 32.58
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 8635.17 144.08 32.20 1543.97 2042.83 147.64 24.61
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5722.16 -43.77 32.20 1822.50 411.57 54.34 9.06
Combination 2 - Frequent Combination
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 8621.26 143.28 16.10 1533.68 1837.05 144.18 24.03
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8531.59 192.03 16.10 2541.62 1733.48 192.71 32.12
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 8621.26 143.28 16.10 1533.68 1837.05 144.18 24.03
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5708.24 -20.28 16.10 1494.47 205.78 25.89 4.31
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7963.81 29.13 19.32 40.46 246.94 34.95 5.83
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7963.81 29.13 19.32 40.46 246.94 34.95 5.83
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7963.81 29.13 19.32 40.46 246.94 34.95 5.83
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5711.03 -19.47 19.32 1504.76 246.94 27.43 4.57
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Case - (ii) Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 8137.09 41.16 16.10 198.10 640.79 44.20 7.37
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8113.17 83.32 16.10 466.88 613.17 84.86 14.14
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 8137.09 41.16 16.10 198.10 640.79 44.20 7.37
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5708.24 -25.14 16.10 1558.02 205.78 29.85 4.97
Combination 3 - Quasi - Permanent Combination
Case - (i)
a): Normal Case 7947.11 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
a): One Span Dislodged Case 5694.33 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor)


Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9042.26 4.83 19.32 -233.6 1492.55 19.91 3.32
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8952.78 4.83 19.32 365.6 1389.21 19.91 3.32
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9042.26 4.83 19.32 -233.6 1492.55 19.91 3.32
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5711.03 4.83 19.32 1187.0 246.94 19.91 3.32
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 8769.86 4.02 16.10 -254.8 1140.0 16.59 2.77
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8702.76 4.02 16.10 194.6 1062.5 16.59 2.77
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 8769.86 4.02 16.10 -254.8 1140.0 16.59 2.77
d): One Span Dislodged Case 0.00 4.02 16.10 1176.7 205.8 16.59 2.77
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 7974.93 4.83 19.32 -236.12 411.6 19.91 3.32
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

9.0 Combination for Calculation of Base pressures as per Table 3.4 of IRC : 6 -2014

9.0.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item HL HT eL eT ML MT
P
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
2c Snow load Reaction: left span (with 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
2d Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 0.00 13.076 13.076 2427.73 0.00
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 0.00 250.68 0.00 13.076 13.076 3277.77 0.00
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 0.00 185.67 0.00 13.076 13.076 2427.73 0.00
4k i Centrifugal force 88.58 0.00 13.076 13.076 1158.26 0.00
4l Span Dislodged 112.64 0.00 13.076 13.076 1472.82 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 54.15 13.076 13.076 708.04 708.04
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 61.23 13.076 13.076 800.61 800.61
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 54.15 13.076 13.076 708.04 708.04
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 112.64 13.076 13.076 1472.82 1472.82

4Q Thermal Loads 48.60 13.076 13.076 635.47 0.00

5 Loads from Substructure LWL Case


5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 -0.65 -10.31
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.65 10.31
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 63.333 25.00 1583.33 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LWL 4.210 25.00 105.26 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5i Footing 47.085 25.00 1177.13 0.00 0.00
5j Volume of earth above Footing 14.62 20.00 292.47 0.00 0.00
3963.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 Wind forces
7a Wind Force On super structure A1 16.07 3.85 15.38 14.641 14.641 56.31 225.22
Wind Force On super structure A2 11.75 2.81 11.25 13.14 13.14 36.97 147.88
7b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 16.768 16.768 0.00 0.00
7c Windforce on piercap 0.08 0.32 11.926 11.926 0.95 3.80
7d Windforce on pier 1.31 5.24 6.613 6.613 8.67 34.66
27.82 8.05 32.20 102.89 411.57
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
10 Seismic Forces
10a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 218.71 292.53 0.00 3271.52 0.00
10b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -217.915 292.53 0.00 3271.52 0.00
10c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -137.591 205.97 0.00 2139.69 0.00
10d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 218.714 0.00 327.42 0.00 4101.02
10e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -217.915 0.00 326.22 0.00 4081.33
10f Trans. seismic with One Span Dislodged -137.591 0.00 205.97 0.00 2288.56

Snow load Reaction: Left span (No


11 Live Load) 0.00 -0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
Snow load Reaction: Right span (No
Live Load) 0.00 0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00

COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 282.302 32.198 3350.474 1428.324
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8735.685 347.312 32.198 4694.395 1290.232
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 282.302 32.198 3350.474 1428.324
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1+(4Q*1)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*1+(5*1) 5722.156 169.289 32.198 3336.479 411.566
COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 282.302 32.198 3350.474 1428.324
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8735.685 347.312 32.198 4694.395 1290.232
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 282.302 32.198 3350.474 1428.324
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1+(4Q*1)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*1+(5*1) 5722.156 169.289 32.198 3336.479 411.566

COMBINATION 3
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10a*(r1+ 8188.789 312.223 98.225 4654.370 1433.657
r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10b*1.25 7881.348 313.639 97.866 4771.661 1400.132
*1)
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10b*(r1+r 8057.800 312.223 97.866 4654.370 1427.750
2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*0+(5*1)+( 5673.695 149.815 48.933 2807.439 343.283
10c*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*0.5)
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10d*(r1+ 8188.789 107.449 327.416 1239.011 4304.370
r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10e*(r1+r 7881.348 108.865 326.220 1356.303 4257.062
2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10e*(r1+r 8057.800 107.449 326.220 1239.011 4284.681
2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*0+(5*1)+( 5673.695 77.724 102.987 2058.547 1144.278
10f*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*0.5)
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
COMBINATION 1 (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 9053.384 8.049 32.198 -192.466 1657.175
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8963.910 8.049 32.198 406.712 1553.832
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 9053.384 8.049 32.198 -192.466 1657.175
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*1+(4Q*0*1)+(7a+7b+7c+7d) 5722.156 8.049 32.198 1228.185 411.566

COMBINATION 2 (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)


Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
9053.384 8.049 32.20 -192.47 1657.18
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1)
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
8963.91 8.049 32.20 406.71 1553.8
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1)
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
9053.384 8.049 32.20 -192.47 1657.2
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1)
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*1+(4Q*0*1)+(7a+7b+7c+7d) 5722.156 8.049 32.20 1228.19 411.57
*1+(5*1)

COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)

Wind Load as Leading Load

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 8.049 32.198 -236.121 411.566


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

9.4 No. of Piles Required


L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Pier = 1.50 x 3.50 m
= 1.50 x 3.50 m
Size of Pier Cap 4.30 x 7.30 m
Cover to Reinforcement = 75 mm
Depth of Footing (D) = 2 mm
Width of the meber (b) = 4300.00 mm
Dia of Pile = 1.00 m trans longi
No of Piles = 6 3 2
C/c dist between piles in LL dir = 3.00 m
C/c dist between piles in TT dir = 3.00 m

Length of Pile cap in LL dir = 3.00 x 1 + 0.65 x 2 = 4.30 m


Length of Pile cap in TT dir = 3.00 x 2 + 0.65 x 2 = 7.30 m
Depth of Pile cap = 1.50 m

Base Pressure = P/A ± ML / ZL ± MT / ZT


Load Load Case Description Vertical Long. Transvers
Long. H. F Tran. H. F Tota l HF HF per Pile
Case Load Moment e Moment
(Kn) (Kn) (KN) Pile (KN) Capacity Status
No P 'ML' 'ML'
(KN)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 8855.24 282.30 32.20 3350.47 1428.32 284.13 47.36 200.00 OK
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8735.68 347.31 32.20 4694.40 1290.23 348.80 58.13 200.00 OK
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 8855.24 282.30 32.20 3350.47 1428.32 284.13 47.36 200.00 OK
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5722.16 169.29 32.20 3336.48 411.57 172.32 28.72 200.00 OK
Combination 2
Case - (i) Wind Load as Leading Load NOTOK
a): Maximum Reaction Case 8855.24 282.30 32.20 3350.47 1428.32 284.13 47.36 200.00 OK
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8735.68 347.31 32.20 4694.40 1290.23 348.80 58.13 200.00 OK
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 8855.24 282.30 32.20 3350.47 1428.32 284.13 47.36 200.00 OK
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5722.16 169.29 32.20 3336.48 411.57 172.32 28.72 200.00 OK
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 8188.79 312.22 98.22 4654.37 1433.66 327.31 54.55 250.00 OK
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 7881.35 313.64 97.87 4771.66 1400.13 328.55 54.76 250.00 OK
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 8057.80 312.22 97.87 4654.37 1427.75 327.20 54.53 250.00 OK
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 5673.70 149.81 48.93 2807.44 343.28 157.60 26.27 250.00 OK
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 8188.79 107.45 327.42 1239.01 4304.37 344.60 57.43 250.00 OK
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 7881.35 108.86 326.22 1356.30 4257.06 343.91 57.32 250.00 OK
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 8057.80 107.45 326.22 1239.01 4284.68 343.46 57.24 250.00 OK
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 5673.70 77.72 102.99 2058.55 1144.28 129.02 21.50 250.00 OK
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load NOTOK
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9053.38 8.05 32.20 -192.47 1657.18 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8963.91 8.05 32.20 406.71 1553.83 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9053.38 8.05 32.20 -192.47 1657.18 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5722.16 8.05 32.20 1228.19 411.57 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9053.38 8.05 32.20 -192.47 1657.18 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8963.91 8.05 32.20 406.71 1553.83 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9053.38 8.05 32.20 -192.47 1657.18 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5722.16 8.05 32.20 1228.19 411.57 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 8855.24 8.05 32.20 -236.12 411.57 33.19 5.53 200.00 OK

Section Properties of Pile cap:

No of Piles A = 6
Section Modulus ZLL =( 3 x 3.00 ^2 + 0 x 3.00 ^2 ) 2
= 54.00 m^3
Section ModulusZTT = 2 x 3.00 ^2 + 2 x 0.00 ^ 2) =
2 = 36.00 m^3
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

XL XT P/n ML/ZT * XL MT/ZL * XT Total load


Load on Pile 1 1.50 -3.00 1475.88 93.07 -119.03 1449.92
Load on Pile 2 1.50 0.00 1475.88 93.07 0 1568.95

Load on Pile 3 1.50 3.00 1475.88 93.07 119.03 1687.98


Load on Pile 4 -1.50 -3.00 1475.88 -93.07 -119.03 1263.78
Load on Pile 5 -1.50 0.00 1475.88 -93.07 0 1382.81

Load on Pile 6 -1.50 3.00 1475.88 -93.07 119.03 1501.84


13.50 36.00 8855.28
Load due to P = P/n
Load due to ML = ML/ZT * XL
Load due to MT = MT/ZL * XT
Total Load = (P / n) + (ML/ZT * XL) + (MT/ZL * XT)

Load Case Pile-1 Pile-2 Pile-3 Pile-4 Pile-5 Pile-6 Total Load
(Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1449.92 1615.48 1687.97 1263.78 1382.81 1475.87 8875.82
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1478.83 1651.55 1693.87 1218.03 1325.55 1455.95 8823.77
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1449.92 1615.48 1687.97 1263.78 1382.81 1475.87 8875.82
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1012.08 1092.71 1080.67 826.72 861.01 953.69 5826.88
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1449.92 1568.94 1687.97 1263.78 1382.81 1501.83 8855.24
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1478.83 1586.35 1693.87 1218.03 1325.55 1433.07 8735.68
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1449.92 1568.94 1687.97 1263.78 1382.81 1501.83 8855.24
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1012.08 1046.37 1080.67 826.72 861.01 895.31 5722.16
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction
1374.61
Case 1494.09 1613.56 1116.04 1235.51 1354.98 8188.79
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal
1329.43
Case 1446.10 1562.78 1064.33 1181.01 1297.69 7881.35
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse
1353.28
Case 1472.25 1591.23 1094.70 1213.68 1332.66 8057.80
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged
994.99
Case 1023.60 1052.21 839.02 867.63 896.24 5673.70
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction1040.52
Case 1399.22 1757.91 971.68 1313.17 1689.08 8171.58
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal
996.48
Case 1351.23 1705.99 921.13 1257.05 1630.64 7862.51
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse
1020.33
Case 1377.38 1734.44 951.49 1291.34 1665.61 8040.59
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged
907.44
Case 1002.80 1098.15 793.08 859.84 983.79 5645.10
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Combination 1 ( Considering
congestion factor as per IRC:6-
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1365.45 1503.55 1641.65 1376.15 1514.24 1652.34 9053.38
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1375.80 1505.28 1634.77 1353.20 1482.69 1612.17 8963.91
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1365.45 1503.55 1641.65 1376.15 1514.24 1652.34 9053.38
d): One Span Dislodged Case 953.51 987.81 1022.11 885.28 919.58 953.87 5722.16
Combination 2 ( Considering
congestion factor as per IRC:6-
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1365.45 1503.55 1641.65 1376.15 1514.24 1652.34 9053.38
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1375.80 1505.28 1634.77 1353.20 1482.69 1612.17 8963.91
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1365.45 1503.55 1641.65 1376.15 1514.24 1652.34 9053.38
d): One Span Dislodged Case 953.51 987.81 1022.11 885.28 919.58 953.87 5722.16
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 1435.02 1469.32 1503.61 1448.14 1482.43 1516.73 8855.24

Check for the Axial Load Carrying Capacity

Maximum Vertical Reaction Normal Case = 1693.87 < 3000.00 Hence O.K
Maximum Vertical Reaction Seismic Case = 1757.91 < 3750.00 Hence O.K

Minimum Vertical Reaction Normal Case = 826.72 > 0.00 Hence O.K
Minimum Vertical Reaction Seismic Case = 793.08 > 0.00 Hence O.K
Longitudinal direction
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 0.65
PROJECT:
81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17 1
4
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER
TITLE:
FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB RS GMS
Transverse direction
9.1 Design of Pile Cap for SLS Case
L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Pier = 1.50 x 3.50 m 3.00
Size of Section for flexure / Sec 1-1 = 1.50 x 3.50 m
Size of pile cap 4.30 x 7.30 m Overall width of cap
Clear Cover to reinforcement = 75 mm
2
Depth of Footing (D) = 1500.0 mm 5 7.30 m
Width of the meber (b) = 4300.00 mm C/L of pile cap

Section Properties of Pile cap:

No of Piles = 6 No.s
Section Modulus
ZLL = 54.00 m^3 3.00

Section Modulus
ZTT = 36.00 m^3
3
XL XT P/n ML/ZT * XL MT/ZL * XT Total load 6
Load on Pile 1 1.50 -3.00 1474.02 89.63 -134.56 1429.09 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 2 1.50 0.00 1474.02 89.63 0 1563.65 2.25 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.65
Load on Pile 3 1.50 3.00 1474.02 89.63 134.56 1698.21 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 4 -1.50 -3.00 1474.02 -89.63 -134.56 1249.83 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 5 -1.50 0.00 1474.02 -89.63 0 1384.39 2.25 0.00
0.00 0.00
Load on Pile 6 -1.50 3.00 1474.02 -89.63 134.56 1518.95 2.25 9.00
13.50 36.00 8844.12
Load due to P = P/n
Load due to ML = ML/ZT * XL 0.65 3.00 0.65
Load due to MT = MT/ZL * XT
Total Load = (P / n) + (ML/ZT * XL) + (MT/ZL * XT)
4.30 m
Load Case Pile-1 Pile-2 Pile-3 Pile-4 Pile-5 Pile-6
(Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn)
Combination 1 - Rare Combination C/L of pile cap
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1429.09 1563.65 1698.20 1249.84 1384.39 1518.95
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1472.84 1599.72 1726.60 1181.59 1308.47 1435.35
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1429.09 1563.65 1698.20 1249.84 1384.39 1518.95
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1003.47 1017.18 1030.90 872.77 886.49 900.21
Case - (ii)Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1296.45 1319.32 1342.18 1316.13 1338.99 1361.86
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1296.45 1319.32 1342.18 1316.13 1338.99 1361.86
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1296.45 1319.32 1342.18 1316.13 1338.99 1361.86
d): One Span Dislodged Case 997.89 1020.75 1043.62 863.77 886.63 909.50
Case - (ii)Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1390.04 1503.53 1617.02 1261.37 1374.86 1488.35
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1422.84 1530.58 1638.32 1210.18 1317.92 1425.66
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1390.04 1503.53 1617.02 1261.37 1374.86 1488.35
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1006.77 1029.63 1052.49 854.89 877.76 900.62
Combination 2 - Frequent Combination
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1398.72 1500.78 1602.84 1270.91 1372.97 1475.03
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1431.53 1527.83 1624.14 1219.73 1316.03 1412.33
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1398.72 1500.78 1602.84 1270.91 1372.97 1475.03
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1002.21 1013.64 1025.08 877.67 889.10 900.54
Case - (ii)Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1315.27 1328.99 1342.71 1311.90 1325.62 1339.33
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1315.27 1328.99 1342.71 1311.90 1325.62 1339.33
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1315.27 1328.99 1342.71 1311.90 1325.62 1339.33
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1000.82 1014.54 1028.26 875.42 889.14 902.86
Case - (ii)Thermal Load as Leading Load
Longitudinal direction
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 0.65
PROJECT:
81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17 1
4
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER
TITLE:
FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB RS GMS
Transverse direction
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1328.84 1364.44 1400.03 1312.33 1347.93 1383.53
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1337.58 1371.65 1405.71 1298.68 1332.74 1366.81
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1328.84 1364.44 1400.03 1312.33 1347.93 1383.53
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1004.86 1016.29 1027.72 875.02 886.46 897.89
Combination 3 - Quasi - Permanent Combination
Case - (i)
a): Normal Case 1324.52 1324.52 1324.52 1324.52 1324.52 1324.52
a): One Span Dislodged Case 949.06 949.06 949.06 949.06 949.06 949.06

Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor)


Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1414.39 1497.31 1580.23 1433.86 1516.78 1599.70
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1430.18 1507.36 1584.54 1399.72 1476.90 1554.08
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1414.39 1497.31 1580.23 1433.86 1516.78 1599.70
d): One Span Dislodged Case 987.58 1001.30 1015.02 888.66 902.38 916.10
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1387.69 1451.03 1514.36 1408.93 1472.26 1535.59
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1399.54 1458.57 1517.59 1383.33 1442.35 1501.38
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1387.69 1451.03 1514.36 1408.93 1472.26 1535.59
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow
Case - (ii)Wind Load as Leading Load 1296.45 1319.32 1342.18 1316.13 1338.99 1361.86

9.2

9.2.1 Crack width calculations in L-L Direction


Combina
Combination1 (congestion factor as per Combination2 (congestion tion1
Combination1 - Rare Comb-2 - Quasi
IRC:6-2014) factor as per IRC:6-2014) (consider
ing snow
Wind
Load as
Leading
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Thermal Load as Leading Load Normal Span Dislodged
Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Load
Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16 Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 23
Total Upward load from piles Kn 4690.9 4799.1 4690.9 3051.6 4017.0 4017.0 4017.0 3062.3 4510.6 4591.7 4510.6 3088.9 3973.6 2847.2 4550.33 4522.08 4550.33 3003.89 4416.78 4375.70 4416.78 4016.98
Distance from CL of pile to edge of pier m 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750
Upward Moment at the face of Pier Knm 3518.20 3599.36 3518.20 2288.66 3012.74 3012.74 3012.74 2296.70 3382.94 3443.80 3382.94 2316.67 2980.17 2135.38 3412.75 3391.56 3412.75 2252.92 3312.59 3281.77 3312.59 3012.74
Self wt of pile cap + soil Kn/m^2 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625
Length of Cantilever m 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400
Downward moment at face of pier Knm 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2
Net Upward Moment/ m width Knm 432.33 443.45 432.33 263.90 363.09 363.09 363.09 265.00 413.80 422.14 413.80 267.74 358.63 242.90 417.89 414.99 417.89 259.01 404.17 399.95 404.17 363.09
Effective Width of footing m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Effective depth required (21372.77 x 10^6 / (5.34 x 2240) 304.04 307.93 304.04 237.55 278.63 278.63 278.63 238.04 297.46 300.44 297.46 239.27 276.92 227.90 298.92 297.88 298.92 235.33 293.97 292.43 293.97 278.63
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Neutral Axis Depth, X= (mm)Value of Xu = mm 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92
LHS = b* xu^2/2 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283
RHS = m x Ast x (d-Xu) 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283
LHS - RHS = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pρ eff= As/Ac eff 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148
Diameter of Bar provided at Bottom 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Spacing of main steel to be provided at bottom 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Area of main steel provided at bottom (mm^2) mm2 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142
Max. crack spacing, Sr Max mm 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485
Moment of inertia of cracked section 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10
Stress in Steel(Mpa) 102.48 105.11 102.48 62.55 86.07 86.07 86.07 62.82 98.09 100.06 98.09 63.46 85.01 57.58 99.05 98.37 99.05 61.39 95.80 94.80 95.80 86.07
Stress in concrete(Mpa) 2.969 3.045 2.969 1.812 2.493 2.493 2.493 1.820 2.841 2.899 2.841 1.839 2.463 1.668 2.870 2.850 2.870 1.779 2.775 2.746 2.775 2.493
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0003 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0002 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003
Crack width Wk Sr max(esm-ecm) (mm) 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03
Longitudinal direction
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 0.65
PROJECT:
81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17 1
4
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER
TITLE:
FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB RS GMS
Transverse direction
Combina
tion1
Combination1 (congestion factor as per Combination2 (congestion (consider
9.2.2 Check for Flexure in T-T direction Combination1 - Rare Comb-2 - Quasi IRC:6-2014) factor as per IRC:6-2014) ing snow
Wind
Load as
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Thermal Load as Leading Load Normal Span Dislodged
Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as LeadingLeading
Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16 Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 23
Total Upward load from piles3217 m 3217.1 3199.4 3217.1 1931.1 2704.0 2704.0 2704.0 1953.1 3105.4 3064.0 3105.4 1953.1 2649.0 1898.1 3179.924 3138.62 3179.92 1931.11 3049.95 3018.97 3049.95 2704.04
Distance from CL of pile to 1.250
edge of pier m 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250
Upward Moment at the face4021of Pier m 4021.4 3999.3 4021.4 2413.9 3380.1 3380.1 3380.1 2441.4 3881.7 3830.0 3881.7 2441.4 3311.3 2372.6 3974.9 3923.3 3974.9 2413.9 3812.4 3773.7 3812.4 3380.1
Self wt of pile cap + soil 50.625 m 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625 50.625
Length of Cantilever (3217.14538201536 - 4021.4317275192)
m 1.900
/2 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400
Downward moment at face (1.25
of pier- 50.625) / 2 m 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9
Net Upward Moment/ m width KNm 843.84 838.69 843.84 469.99 694.68 694.68 694.68 476.39 811.35 799.31 811.35 476.39 678.69 460.4 833.0 821.0 833.0 470.0 795.2 786.2 795.2 694.7
Effective Width of footing 50.625 + (1.25 - 50.625) / 8 m 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Effective depth required (21372.77 x 10^6 / (5.34 x 2240) 424.772 423.474 424.772 317.009 385.406 385.406 385.406 319.159 416.514 413.413 416.514 319.159 380.945 313.757 422.040 418.987 422.040 317.009 412.358 410.016 412.358 385.406
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Neutral Axis Depth, X= (mm) Value of Xu = mm 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92 216.92
LHS = b* xu^2/2 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283
RHS = m x Ast x (d-Xu) 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283 23527283
LHS - RHS = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pρ eff= As/Ac eff 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148
Diameter of Bar provided at Bottom 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
Spacing of main steel to be provided at bottom 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Area of main steel provided at bottom (mm^2) mm2 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142
Max. crack spacing, Sr Max mm 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485 485
Moment of inertia of cracked section mm4 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10 3.16E+10
Stress in Steel(Mpa) N/mm2 200.02 198.80 200.02 111.41 164.67 164.67 164.67 112.92 192.32 189.47 192.32 112.92 160.88 109.13 197.46 194.61 197.46 111.41 188.50 186.37 188.50 164.67
Stress in concrete(Mpa) N/mm2 5.794 5.759 5.794 3.227 4.770 4.770 4.770 3.271 5.571 5.489 5.571 3.271 4.660 3.161 5.720 5.638 5.720 3.227 5.461 5.399 5.461 4.770
(ϵsm-ϵcm) 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0003 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0003 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0003 0.0005 0.0003 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0003 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0005
Crack width Wk Sr max(esm-ecm) (mm) 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.05
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

9.3 Design of Working Pile for SLS (Fixed Head Pile)

Note: Pile length considered is 13.6m and liner length to be provided is 8m and thickness of liner to
be considered as 8mm
Youngs Modulus E = = 29580 kn/m^2
Moment of Inertia I = p x 1.0 ^ 4 / 64 = 0.049 m^4
C/s area A = p x 1.0 ^2 / 4 = 0.785 m^2

Pile cap Bott GL


Exposed Length L1 = 280.190 - 282.290 = 0.00 m

Length of fixity: T = 5√ EI As per Clause C 2.3.1 of (Appendix C)


hH IS:2911(PartI/Sec-2)-1979

hH = 5 kn/m^3 (From Table 3 of Appendix C for medium sand)

T = 3.10 m

For L1 / T = 0.00 ; Lf / T = 2.200


Lf = 2.20 x 3.10 = 6.82 m

Equivalent length of cantilever L = L1 + Lf


= 0.00 + 6.82

Equivalent length of cantilever L = 6.82 m

Least radius of gyration g min = I/A = 0.25 m


Effective length L = = 6.82 m

slenderness ratio = L / r min


= 6.8 / 0.25 = 27.280
Effective Length of Pile Shaft (Refer Notes under Clause 306.2.1 of IRC:21-2000)

Pile Shaft Height L = 6.820 m


Service Case One Span Dislodged Case
Effective length leff = 1.2 x L = 8.184 1.75 x L = 11.935
Slenderness ratio leff / r = 32.7 < 50 0.48 (<12) 12
Type of Member = Short Column Pedestal
Stress reduction Coefficient b = 1.5 - l / (100 x r) 1.00 1.5 - l / (100 x r) 1.0000
(Refer clause 306.4.3 of IRC:21)
< 50 (Short Column)
Reduction Factor for BM = 0.820 (From Fig 3B for Fixed head pile)

Allowable tilt of pile wrt cl at top = 1 in 150


= 6.82 / 150
e = 0.045467 m

Bending Moment = Q (L1+LF)/2 x R.F + V x e

Ast provided in working piles = 20 nos of 16 mm dia bars = 4021.24 mm^2

Percentage of steel provided = = 0.51 %


> 0.40 %
(Min. % of steel as per Cl.709.4.4 of IRC:78)
Summary of Loads & Moments on the Pile:
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

Load (V) H.F (Q) Moment Dia of Pile Ast


Load Case Description
(KN) (KN) (KN-m) (m) (mm^2)
Combination 1 - Rare Combination
Case - (i)Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1698.20 31.91 166.45 1.0 4021
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1726.60 42.71 197.92 1.0 4021
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1698.20 31.91 166.45 1.0 4021
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1030.90 5.18 61.36 1.0 4021
Case - (ii)Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1361.86 5.53 77.39 1.0 4021
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1361.86 5.53 77.39 1.0 4021
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1361.86 5.53 77.39 1.0 4021
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1043.62 6.42 65.40 1.0 4021
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

Case - (iii)Thermal Load as Leading Load


a): Maximum Reaction Case 1617.02 24.61 142.33 1.0 4021
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1638.32 32.58 165.61 1.0 4021
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1617.02 24.61 142.33 1.0 4021
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1052.49 9.06 73.18 1.0 4021
Combination 2 - Frequent Combination
Case - (i)Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1602.84 24.03 140.07 1.0 4021
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1624.14 32.12 163.66 1.0 4021
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1602.84 24.03 140.07 1.0 4021
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1025.08 4.31 58.68 1.0 4021
Case - (ii)Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1342.71 5.83 77.34 1.0 4021
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1342.71 5.83 77.34 1.0 4021
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1342.71 5.83 77.34 1.0 4021
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1028.26 4.57 59.54 1.0 4021
Case - (iii)Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
1400.03 7.37 84.26 1.0 4021
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal
1405.71
Case 14.14 103.47 1.0 4021
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse1400.03
Case 7.37 84.26 1.0 4021
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged1027.72
Case 4.97 60.64 1.0 4021
Combination 3 - Quasi - Permanent Combination
Case - (i)
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
1324.52 0.00 60.23 1.0 4021
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal949.06
Case 0.00 43.16 1.0 4021

Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)


Case - (i)Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1599.70 3.32 82.02 1.0 4021
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1584.54 3.32 81.33 1.0 4021
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1599.70 3.32 82.02 1.0 4021
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1015.02 3.32 55.43 1.0 4021
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i)Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1535.59 2.77 77.56 1.0 4021
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1517.59 2.77 76.74 1.0 4021
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1535.59 2.77 77.56 1.0 4021
d): One Span Dislodged Case 60.46 2.77 10.49 1.0 4021
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)
Case - (ii)Wind Load as Leading Load 1361.86 3.32 71.20 1.0 4021
Design of section For Piles No of load cases 35
Design data Time : 7:48:15 PM Date : 19-02-2017
Dimensions of section LC No. Case - 1 Case - 2 Case - 3 Case - 4 Case - 5 Case - 6 Case - 7 Case - 8 Case - 9 Case-10 Case-11 Case-12 Case-13 Case-14 Case-15 Case-16 Case-17 Case-18 Case-19 Case-20
Diameter of section [D] mm = 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Design forces
Axial force [P] kN = 1698.20 1726.60 1698.20 1030.90 1361.86 1361.86 1361.86 1043.62 1617.02 1638.32 1617.02 1052.49 1602.84 1624.14 1602.84 1025.08 1342.71 1342.71 1342.71 1028.26
Resultant BM [M] kNm = 166.45 197.92 166.45 61.36 77.39 77.39 77.39 65.40 142.33 165.61 142.33 73.18 140.07 163.66 140.07 58.68 77.34 77.34 77.34 59.54
Modular ratio [m] # = 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56
Permissible stress
Concrete direct compression [scc] Mpa = 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2
Concrete bending compression [scbc] Mpa = 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2
Steel direct compression [ssc] Mpa = 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
Steel bending tension [sst] Mpa = 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
Reinforcements
Percentage steel assumed [pt] % = 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51
Clear cover to main reinf. = 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Y Data Check ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok

Reinforcement ring
Compression
NA
Execute
D M
X
P

Tension
Cover

Results
Design condition = Un cracked sectionPCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS
Diameter of the Section [D] mm = 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Axial Load on Column [P] kN = 1698.2 1726.6 1698.2 1030.9 1361.9 1361.9 1361.9 1043.6 1617.0 1638.3 1617.0 1052.5 1602.8 1624.1 1602.8 1025.1 1342.7 1342.7 1342.7 1028.3
Percentage steel [pt] % = 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512
Concrete direct compression [scc] Mpa = 2.069 2.103181 2.068589 1.25575 1.65889 1.65889 1.65889 1.271239 1.9697 1.995644 1.9697 1.282051 1.952428 1.978372 1.952428 1.248653 1.635559 1.635559 1.635559 1.252525
Concrete bending compression [scbc] Mpa = 1.603 1.905598 1.602601 0.590781 0.74512 0.74512 0.74512 0.629679 1.37037 1.594513 1.37037 0.704586 1.348611 1.575738 1.348611 0.564978 0.744639 0.744639 0.744639 0.573258
Compressive stress in steel [ssc] Mpa = 32.97 35.69617 32.97059 17.00721 22.18906 22.18906 22.18906 17.46583 30.16941 32.18915 30.16941 18.16188 29.82815 31.87139 29.82815 16.73425 21.9557 21.9557 21.9557 16.83753
Tensile stress in steel , [ sst] Mpa = 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Depth of neutral axis NA mm = 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stress level in material [scc] = ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[scbc] = ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[ssc] = ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[ sst] = ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Design of section For Piles
Design data Time : 7:48:15 PM
Dimensions of section Case-21 Case-22 Case-23 Case-24 Case-25 Case-26 Case - 27 Case - 28 Case - 29 Case - 30 Case - 31 Case - 32 Case - 33 Case - 34 Case - 35
Diameter of section [D] mm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Design forces
Axial force [P] kN 1400.03 1405.71 1400.03 1027.72 1324.52 949.06 1599.70 1584.54 1599.70 1015.02 1535.59 1517.59 1535.59 60.46 1361.86
Resultant BM [M] kNm 84.26 103.47 84.26 60.64 60.23 43.16 82.02 81.33 82.02 55.43 77.56 76.74 77.56 10.49 71.20
Modular ratio [m] # 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56
Permissible stress
Concrete direct compression [scc] Mpa 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2
Concrete bending compression [scbc] Mpa 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2
Steel direct compression [ssc] Mpa 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
Steel bending tension [sst] Mpa 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
Reinforcements
Percentage steel assumed [pt] % 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.512 0.512 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179
Clear cover to main reinf. 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Y Data Check ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok

Reinforcement ring
Compression
NA
Execute
D M
X
P

Tension
Cover

Results
Design condition PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS
Diameter of the Section [D] mm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Axial Load on Column [P] kN 1400.0 1405.7 1400.0 1027.7 1324.5 949.1 1599.7 1584.5 1599.7 1015.0 1535.6 1517.6 1535.6 60.5 1361.9
Percentage steel [pt] % 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179
Concrete direct compression [scc] Mpa 1.705392 1.71231 1.705392 1.251878 1.613406 1.156051 1.948601205 1.930139013 1.948601205 1.236398383 1.870517812 1.848590184 1.870517812 0 1.658889987
Concrete bending compression [scbc] Mpa 0.811265 0.996222 0.811265 0.583849 0.579902 0.41555 0.789698412 0.783055009 0.789698412 0.533686698 0.746756996 0.738861938 0.746756996 0.177820516 0.685522152
Compressive stress in steel [ssc] Mpa 23.16734 24.69139 23.16734 16.91454 20.4409 14.64675 25.39074176 25.15677692 25.39074176 16.36734177 24.28436634 24.00644858 24.28436634 1.542170582 21.71990786
Tensile stress in steel , [ sst] Mpa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.07899721 0
Depth of neutral axis NA mm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 842.023469 0
Stress level in material [scc] ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[scbc] ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[ssc] ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[ sst] ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

Combination for calculation of Base pressure for Design of Foundation as per Table 3.4

10.0 Normal Case with Maximum Load (LWL Condition):

10.0.1
Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base

Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item HL HT eL eT ML MT
P
3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
2c Snow load Reaction: left span (with 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
2d Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 0.00 13.076 13.076 2427.73 0.00
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 0.00 250.68 0.00 13.076 13.076 3277.77 0.00
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 0.00 185.67 0.00 13.076 13.076 2427.73 0.00
4k i Centrifugal force 88.58 0.00 13.076 13.076 1158.26 0.00
4l Span Dislodged 112.64 0.00 13.076 13.076 1472.82 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 13.076 13.076 708.04 0.00
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 0.00 13.076 13.076 800.61 0.00
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 13.076 13.076 708.04 0.00
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 0.00 13.076 13.076 1472.82 0.00

4Q Thermal Loads 48.60 13.076 13.076 635.47 0.00

5 Loads from Substructure LWL Case


5a Weight of Pedestal : Left Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 -0.65 -10.31
5b Weight of Pedestal : Right Span 0.635 25.00 15.86 0.65 10.31
5c Pier Cap (Uniform portion) 18.360 25.00 459.00 0.00 0.00
5d Pier Cap (Trapezoidal portion) 12.568 25.00 314.20 0.00 0.00
5e Platform at Pier cap Level 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f Pier Shaft upto LWL 63.333 25.00 1583.33 0.00 0.00
5g Pier Shaft below LWL 4.210 25.00 105.26 0.00 0.00
5h Pedestal below the Pier shaft 0.000 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5i Footing 47.085 25.00 1177.13 0.00 0.00
5j Volume of earth above Footing 14.62 20.00 292.47 0.00 0.00
3963.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Wind forces
6a Wind Force On super structure A1 16.07 3.85 15.38 14.641 14.641 56.31 225.22
Wind Force On super structure A2 11.75 2.81 11.25 13.14 13.14 36.97 147.88
6b Wind force on liveload 0.00 0.00 16.768 16.768 0.00 0.00
6c Windforce on piercap 0.08 0.32 11.926 11.926 0.95 3.80
6d Windforce on pier 1.31 5.24 6.613 6.613 8.67 34.66
27.82 8.05 32.20 102.89 411.57
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
7 Seismic Forces
7a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 218.71 292.53 0.00 3271.52 0.00
7b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -217.915 292.53 0.00 3271.52 0.00
7c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -137.591 205.97 0.00 2139.69 0.00
7d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 218.714 0.00 327.42 0.00 4101.02
7e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -217.915 0.00 326.22 0.00 4081.33
Snow load Reaction: Left span (No
11 Live Load) 0.00 -0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
Snow load Reaction: Right span (No
Live Load) 0.00 0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00

COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Longi. Trans
Vertical Long. H. Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load Load (Kn) F (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 12074.1 418.624 28.978 5014.828 1895.546
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 11894.8 516.139 28.978 7030.710 1688.409
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 12074.1 418.624 28.978 5014.828 1895.546
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1.35+(2c+)*1.75+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1.5+(4Q*0.9)+(6a+6b+6c+6d) 7712.4 219.945 28.978 4392.908 370.409
*0.9+(5*1.35)
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 10770.3 12.074 48.297 -303.330 617.349
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 10770.3 12.074 48.297 -303.330 617.349
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 10770.3 12.074 48.297 -303.330 617.349
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4g+4h+4l)*1.5+(4Q*0.9)+(6* 7729.1 55.814 48.297 2245.406 617.349
0.9)+(5*1)

COMBINATION 2
Longi. Trans
Vertical Long. H. Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load Load (Kn) F (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.3+(6*0.8)+(5*1) 9113.8 362.968 25.76 4405.87 1651.04
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.3+(6*0.8)+(5*1) 8958.3 447.481 25.76 6152.97 1471.52
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.3+(6*0.8)+(5*1) 9113.8 362.968 25.76 4405.87 1651.04
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1.3+(4Q*0.8)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.8+(5*1) 5716.6 191.752 25.76 3630.65 329.25
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(6*1.3)+(5*1) 7983.3 125.622 41.857 -205.254 535.036
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(6*1.3)+(5*1) 7983.3 125.622 41.857 -205.254 535.036
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(6*1.3)+(5*1) 7983.3 125.622 41.857 -205.254 535.036
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1.3+(4Q*0.8)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.8+(5*1) 5730.5 49.344 41.857 1767.428 535.036
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

COMBINATION 3
Longi. Trans
Vertical Long. H. Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case Load (Kn) F (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1. 11037.5 612.071 198.905 8401.532 2694.720
35)+(7a*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1.3 10748.4 613.487 198.179 8518.823 2655.141
5)+(7b*1.25*1.5)
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1.3 9385.2 612.071 198.179 8401.532 2682.759
5)+(7b*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1.35+(2c+)*1.75+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d) 6258.5 255.377 99.089 4297.884 1940.833
*0+(5*1.35)+(7c*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*0.75)
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1. 11037.5 197.403 663.017 2245.004 8507.914
35)+(7d*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1.3 9361.3 198.819 660.596 2362.296 8440.425
5)+(7e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1.3 9385.2 197.403 592.383 2245.004 8468.043
5)+(7e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1.35+(2c+)*1.75+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d) 6258.5 109.393 540.057 2781.377 2317.162
*0+(5*1.35)+(7f*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*0.75)

COMBINATION 1 (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)


LOAD COMBINATIONS
Longi. Trans
Vertical Long. Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load Load (Kn) H.F (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1.5+( 12371.3 7.245 28.978 -299.581 2238.823
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*1.5+( 12237.1 7.245 28.978 599.186 2083.809
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*1.5+ 12371.3 7.245 28.978 -299.581 2238.823
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1.35+(2c+)*1.75+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*1.5+(4Q*0*0.9)+( 7712.4 7.245 28.978 1611.749 370.409

COMBINATION 2 (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)


Longi. Trans
Vertical Long. Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load Load (Kn) H.F (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1.3+(6*0.8 9371.4 6.440 25.76 -199.95 1948.54
)+(5*1)
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*1.3+(6*0.8 9255.0379 6.440 25.76 578.98 1814.2
)+(5*1)
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*1.3+(6*0.8 9371 6.440 25.76 -199.95 1948.5
)+(5*1)
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*1.3+(4Q*0*0.8)+(6a+6 5717 6.440 25.76 1207.61 329.25
b+6c+6d)*0.8+(5*1)

COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)

Wind Load as Leading Load

(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1. 10753.642 7.245 28.978 -457.667 370.409


PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

10.1 Summary of Base Pressures for Foundation Design


L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Area of Footing A = 4.300 x 7.300 = 31.39 m^2
Section Modulus along L-L Axis ZL = 7.300 x 4.300 ^2/6 = 22.50 m^3
Section Modulus along T-T Axis ZT = 4.300 x 7.300 ^2/6 = 38.19 m^3

Base Pressure = P/A ± ML / Z L ± MT / Z T

Load Load Case Description Vertical Long. Transverse


Case Load Moment Moment Long. H. F Tran. H. F
No P ML MT (Kn) (Kn)
(KN) (KNm) (KNm)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 12074.11 5014.83 1895.55 418.62 28.98
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 11894.77 7030.71 1688.41 516.14 28.98
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 12074.11 5014.83 1895.55 418.62 28.98
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7712.39 4392.91 370.41 219.94 28.98
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 10770.34 -303.33 617.35 12.07 48.30
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 10770.34 -303.33 617.35 12.07 48.30
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10770.34 -303.33 617.35 12.07 48.30
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7729.08 2245.41 617.35 55.81 48.30
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9113.77 4405.87 1651.04 362.97 25.76
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8958.35 6152.97 1471.52 447.48 25.76
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9113.77 4405.87 1651.04 362.97 25.76
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5716.59 3630.65 329.25 191.75 25.76
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7983.28 -205.25 535.04 125.62 41.86
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7983.28 -205.25 535.04 125.62 41.86
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7983.28 -205.25 535.04 125.62 41.86
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5730.50 1767.43 535.04 49.34 41.86
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 11037.53 8401.53 2694.72 612.07 198.91
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 10748.37 8518.82 2655.14 613.49 198.18
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 9385.19 8401.53 2682.76 612.07 198.18
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 6258.47 4297.88 1940.83 255.38 99.09
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 11037.53 2245.00 8507.91 197.40 663.02
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 9361.28 2362.30 8440.42 198.82 660.60
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 9385.19 2245.00 8468.04 197.40 592.38
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 6258.47 2781.38 2317.16 109.39 540.06
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 12371.32 -299.58 2238.82 7.24 28.98
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 12237.10 599.19 2083.81 7.24 28.98
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 12371.32 -299.58 2238.82 7.24 28.98
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7712.39 1611.75 370.41 7.24 28.98
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9371.35 -199.95 1948.54 6.44 25.76
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 9255.04 578.98 1814.20 6.44 25.76
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9371.35 -199.95 1948.54 6.44 25.76
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5716.59 1207.61 329.25 6.44 25.76
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 10753.64 7.24 28.98 -457.67 370.41
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
10.2 Design of Pile Cap
L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Pier = 1.50 x 3.50 m
= 1.50 x 3.50 m
Size of Pile cap 4.30 x 7.30 m
Cover to Reinforcement = 75 mm

Dia of Pile = 1.00 m trans longi


No of Piles = 6 3 2
C/c dist between piles in LL dir = 3.00 m
C/c dist between piles in TT dir = 3.00 m

Length of Pile cap in LL dir = 3.00 x 1 + 0.65 x 2 = 4.30 m


Length of Pile cap in TT dir = 3.00 x 2 + 0.65 x 2 = 7.30 m

Width of the meber (b) = 4300.00 mm


Depth of Pile cap = 1.50 m
Effective Depth pile cap = 1.328 m= 1328mm
Dpeth of soil above pile cap = 0.50 m

Long. Transvers
Vertical Long. H. F Tran. H. F Moment e Moment Total HF HF per
Load Load Case Description Load P (KN) (KN) 'ML' 'ML' (KN) Pile (KN)
Case No (KN) (KNm) (KNm)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 12074 419 29 5015 1896 419.63 69.94
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 11895 516 29 7031 1688 516.95 86.16
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 12074 419 29 5015 1896 419.63 69.94
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7712 220 29 4393 370 221.85 36.97
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 10770 12 48 -303 617 49.78 8.30
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 10770 12 48 -303 617 49.78 8.30
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10770 12 48 -303 617 49.78 8.30
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7729 56 48 2245 617 73.81 12.30
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9114 363 26 4406 1651 363.88 60.65
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8958 447 26 6153 1472 448.22 74.70
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9114 363 26 4406 1651 363.88 60.65
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5717 192 26 3631 329 193.47 32.25
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7983 126 42 -205 535 132.41 22.07
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7983 126 42 -205 535 132.41 22.07
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7983 126 42 -205 535 132.41 22.07
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5731 49 42 1767 535 64.71 10.78
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 11038 612 199 8402 2695 643.58 107.26
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 10748 613 198 8519 2655 644.70 107.45
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 9385 612 198 8402 2683 643.36 107.23
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 6258 255 99 4298 1941 273.93 45.65
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 11038 197 663 2245 8508 691.78 115.30
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 9361 199 661 2362 8440 689.87 114.98
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 9385 197 592 2245 8468 624.41 104.07
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 6258 109 540 2781 2317 551.02 91.84
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 12371 7 29 -300 2239 29.87 4.98
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 12237 7 29 599 2084 29.87 4.98
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 12371 7 29 -300 2239 29.87 4.98
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7712 7 29 1612 370 29.87 4.98
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9371 6 26 -200 1949 26.55 4.43
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 9255 6 26 579 1814 26.55 4.43
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9371 6 26 -200 1949 26.55 4.43
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5717 6 26 1208 329 26.55 4.43
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 10754 7 29 -458 370 29.87 4.98

Section Properties of Pile cap:

No of Piles A = 6 m^2
Section ModulusZLL =( 3 x 1.50 ^2 + 2 x 0.00 ^2 ) x 2 =
54.00 m^3
Section ModulusZTT = 2 x 3.00 ^2x 2 = 36.00 m^3

XL XT P/n ML/ZT * XL MT/ZL * XT Total load


Load on Pile 1 1.50 -3.00 2012.36 208.96 -278.61 1942.71 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 2 1.50 0.00 2012.36 208.96 0 2221.32 2.25 0.00
0.00 0.00
Load on Pile 3 1.50 3.00 2012.36 208.96 278.61 2499.93 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 4 -1.50 -3.00 2012.36 -208.96 -278.61 1524.79 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 5 -1.50 0.00 2012.36 -208.96 0 1803.40 2.25 0.00
0.00 0.00
Load on Pile 6 -1.50 3.00 2012.36 -208.96 278.61 2082.01 2.25 9.00
13.50 36.00 9992.15 13.50 36.00
Load due to P = P/n
Load due to ML = ML/ZT * XL
Load due to MT = MT/ZL * XT
Total Load = (P / n) + (ML/ZT * XL) + (MT/ZL * XT)

Pile-1 Pile-2 Pile-3 Pile-4 Pile-5 Pile-6 Total Load


Load Case
(Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1993.7 2151.65 2309.61 1715.09 1873.05 2031.01 12074.11
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 2037.1 2177.76 2318.46 1646.46 1787.16 1927.86 11894.77
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1993.7 2151.65 2309.61 1715.09 1873.05 2031.01 12074.11
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1376.6 1407.42 1438.29 1132.51 1163.37 1194.24 7712.39
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1735.2 1786.63 1838.08 1752.04 1803.48 1854.93 10770.34
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1735.2 1786.63 1838.08 1752.04 1803.48 1854.93 10770.34
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1735.2 1786.63 1838.08 1752.04 1803.48 1854.93 10770.34
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1299.1 1350.55 1402.00 1174.36 1225.81 1277.25 7729.08
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1503.8 1641.35 1778.93 1258.99 1396.58 1534.16 9113.77
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1541.3 1663.97 1786.60 1199.52 1322.14 1444.77 8958.35
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1503.8 1641.35 1778.93 1258.99 1396.58 1534.16 9113.77
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1026.2 1053.62 1081.05 824.48 851.91 879.35 5716.59
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1280.3 1324.85 1369.43 1291.66 1336.25 1380.83 7983.28
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1280.3 1324.85 1369.43 1291.66 1336.25 1380.83 7983.28
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1280.3 1324.85 1369.43 1291.66 1336.25 1380.83 7983.28
d): One Span Dislodged Case 959.6 1004.18 1048.77 861.40 905.99 950.57 5730.50
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 1848.4 2072.96 2297.52 1381.65 1606.21 1830.77 11037.53
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 1806.8 2028.03 2249.29 1333.50 1554.76 1776.02 10748.37
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 1574.0 1797.57 2021.14 1107.26 1330.82 1554.39 9385.19
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 1000.7 1162.46 1324.20 761.96 923.69 1085.43 6258.47
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 1193.0 1901.95 2610.94 1068.23 1777.23 2486.22 11037.53
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 922.5 1625.83 2329.20 791.23 1494.59 2197.96 9361.28
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 920.9 1626.56 2332.23 796.17 1501.84 2207.51 9385.19
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 927.2 1120.34 1313.44 772.72 965.82 1158.91 6258.47
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1867.0 2053.56 2240.13 1883.64 2070.21 2256.78 12371.32
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1882.5 2056.16 2229.81 1849.22 2022.87 2196.52 12237.10
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1867.0 2053.56 2240.13 1883.64 2070.21 2256.78 12371.32
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1299.3 1330.17 1361.04 1209.76 1240.63 1271.50 7712.39
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1394.0 1556.34 1718.72 1405.07 1567.45 1729.83 9371.35
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1407.4 1558.59 1709.77 1375.24 1526.42 1677.61 9255.04
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1394.0 1556.34 1718.72 1405.07 1567.45 1729.83 9371.35
d): One Span Dislodged Case 958.9 986.31 1013.75 891.78 919.22 946.66 5716.59
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 1748.7 1779.56 1810.43 1774.12 1804.99 1835.85 10753.64

Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = M35 Mpa (Table no:6.5, IRC:112-2011)
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.80 MPa

Type of Combination = Basic&Seis


Partial material safety factor for concrete (gm) = 1.5 Page 49: (IRC:112-2011)
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete (єcu3) = 0.0035 Mpa (Table no:6.5 (IRC:112-2011))

Modulus of elasticity of concrete (Ecm) = 32000 MPa


Modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm)=
200000/32000 = 6.25
Steel
Grade of Steel = S 500
Characteristic strength of steel (fy)or(fyk) = 500 MPa Table no:18.1 (IRC:112-2011)
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement fywd = 348 MPa 0.8*fyk/γs
Partial material safety factor for Steel (gs) = 1.15 Page 30: (IRC:112-2011)
Ultimate tensile strain in the steel (єs) = 0.00417 [{fyk/(ϒs xEs)}+0.002]
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 MPa Clause 6.2.2 (IRC:112-2011) &6.3.5
fYd = 434.8 N/mm2
Design Factors
Coefficient to consider the influence of the concrete strength (a)
= 0.67 Cube A2.10 Page : 244 (IRC:112-2011)
Factor (l ) = 0.8 Eq.A2-33 & Eq. A2-34 (IRC:112-2011);
Factor (h) = 1 Eq.A2-35 & Eq. A2-36 (IRC:112-2011);
Design value of concrete compressive strength fcd = (a*fck/gm) = 15.633
Factor Fav, (hfcdl) = 12.507
Factor b = (l/2) = 0.400
Lever arm z= = 0.9
Cu = fcd*b*(3/7xu,lim + 2/3*4/7xu,lim)
= 17/21*fcd*b*xu
= 0.8095*fcd*b*xu
cg of compression block from top = 0.416xu
Tu = (fy/1.15)*Ast
Rlim = mu,Lim/BD2
= 0.8095fcd*(xu/d)*(1-0.416*xu/d)
xu,lim/d = 0.456
Rlim = 4.68

10.2.1 Bending Moment in Longitudinal Direction:


Combination1 Combination2
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16
Total Upward load from piles 1993.6 + 2151.6 + 0 Kn 6455.0 6533.3 6455.0 4222.3 5410.4 5410.4 5410.4 4051.7 4924.0 4991.9 4924.0 3160.9 4008.7 4008.7 4008.7 3012.5
Distance from CL of pile to edge of 3 - 1.5/2
pier m 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750
Upward Moment at the face of Pier 6454.95 * 0.75 Knm 4841.2 4900.0 4841.2 3166.7 4057.8 4057.8 4057.8 3038.7 3693.0 3743.9 3693.0 2370.6 3006.6 3006.6 3006.6 2259.4
Self wt of pile cap + soil 1.5 * 25 Kn/m^2 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6
Length of Cantilever 4.3 / 2 - 1.5 / 2 m 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400
Downward moment at face of pier 50.625 * 1.4 * 7.3 ^2/2 Knm 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2
Net Upward Moment 4841.21 - 362.17 Knm/m 614 622 614 384 506 506 506 367 456 463 456 275 362 362 362 260
Limiting moment of resistance of M
section
ulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck KNm/m 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323 9323
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Effective Width of footing m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Effective depth required (613.56 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 1000) 362.2 364.6 362.2 286.6 329.0 329.0 329.0 280.0 312.4 314.7 312.4 242.5 278.3 278.3 278.3 235.7
Effective Depth provided 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Main Steel at bottom face along L-L axis of footing
R Mu/bd^2 0.306 0.310 0.306 0.192 0.253 0.253 0.253 0.183 0.228 0.231 0.228 0.137 0.181 0.181 0.181 0.130
Area of steel required 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d mm^2 1007.3 1020.7 1007.3 628.3 829.6 829.6 829.6 599.5 747.1 758.6 747.1 449.1 592.2 592.2 592.2 424.2
Area of steel required / meter width
Ast required mm^2 1007.3 1020.7 1007.3 628.3 829.6 829.6 829.6 599.5 747.1 758.6 747.1 449.1 592.2 592.2 592.2 424.2
Min Area of steel required max(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) mm^2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Area of steel to be provided Max(1007.33 , 2060.24) 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Spacing of steel required at bottom20 mm + 0 mm dia bars mm 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
ww 20 mm + 0 mm @ 100 mm c/c mm^2 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142
Status O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
% of steel provided 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222
Max. area of tension reinforcement 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375
Status O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
Distribution Steel
Min Area of tension reinforcement 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
Ast req at top face along L-L axis20 % of Ast mm^2 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05
Spacing of steel required at top 12 mm dia bars 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112
Ast provided at top 12 mm bars @ @ 100 mm c/c mm^2 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131
Area of Dist. Steel req on b/face 20 % of Ast mm^2 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05 412.05
Combination1 (congestion factor as per Combination2 (congestion factor as per Combinatio
Combination3 IRC:6-2014) IRC:6-2014) n1
Wind Load
as Leading
Case 1 : Longitudinal Seismic Case Case 2 : Transverse Seismic Case Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 22 Case 23 Case 24 Case 25 Case 26 Case 27 Case 28 Case 29 Case 30 Case 31 Case 32 Case 33
Total Upward load from piles 1993.6 + 2151.6 + 0 Kn 6218.9 6084.1 5392.7 3487.4 5705.9 4877.5 4879.7 3361.0 6211 6168 6211 3991 4702 4675.768 4702.340 2958.930 5414.960
Distance from CL of pile to edge of 3 - 1.5/2
pier m 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750
Upward Moment at the face of Pier 6454.95 * 0.75 Knm 4664.2 4563.1 4044.5 2615.5 4279.4 3658.1 3659.8 2520.8 4658.0 4626.4 4658.0 2992.9 3526.8 3506.8 3526.8 2219.2 4061.2
Self wt of pile cap + soil 1.5 * 25 Kn/m^2 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6
Length of Cantilever 4.3 / 2 - 1.5 / 2 m 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400 1.400
Downward moment at face of pier 50.625 * 1.4 * 7.3 ^2/2 Knm 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2 362.2
Net Upward Moment 4841.21 - 362.17 KNm 589 575 504 309 537 452 452 296 588 584 588 360 434 431 434 254 507
Limiting moment of resistance of M
section
ulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck KNm 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Effective Width of footing m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Effective depth required (589.31 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 1000) 355.0 350.8 328.4 256.9 338.7 310.7 310.8 251.4 354.7 353.4 354.7 277.6 304.5 303.5 304.5 233.2 329.2
Effective Depth provided 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415 1415
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Main Steel at bottom face along L-L axis of footing
R Mu/bd^2 0.294 0.287 0.252 0.154 0.268 0.225 0.226 0.148 0.294 0.292 0.294 0.180 0.217 0.215 0.217 0.127 0.253
Area of steel required 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d mm^2 967.1 944.2 826.6 504.2 879.8 739.2 739.6 482.9 965.7 958.5 965.7 589.1 709.6 705.0 709.6 415.1 830.4
Area of steel required / meter width
Ast required/B mm^2 967.1 944.2 826.6 504.2 879.8 739.2 739.6 482.9 965.7 958.5 965.7 589.1 709.6 705.0 709.6 415.1 830.4
Min Area of steel required max(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) mm^2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Area of steel to be provided Max(967.11 , 2060.24) 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Spacing of steel required at bottom20 mm + 0 mm dia bars mm 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
Ast provided at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm @ 100 mm c/c mm^2 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
% of steel provided 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222
Max. area of tension reinforcement 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
Distribution Steel
Min Area of tension reinforcement 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
Ast req at top face along L-L axis
20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048
Spacing of steel required at top 12 mm dia bars 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112
Ast provided at top 12 mm bars @ @ 100 mm c/c mm^2 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131
Area of Dist. Steel req on b/face20 % of Ast mm^2 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048 412.048
10.2.2 Check For Shear in L-L direction Combination1 Combination2
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16
Total Upward load from piles 6455.0 Kn 6455.0 6533.3 6455.0 4222.3 5410.4 5410.4 5410.4 4051.7 4924.0 4991.9 4924.0 3160.9 4008.7 4008.7 4008.7 3012.5
3 - 1.5 /2 - 1.328
Distance from CL of pile to critical section m -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578
STATUS Shear Reinforcement Not Required

Combination3 Combination1 (congestion factor as per Combination2 (congestion factor as per


Case 1 : Longitudinal Seismic Case Case 2 : Transverse Seismic Case Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Live Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 22 Case 23 Case 24 Case 25 Case 26 Case 27 Case 28 Case 29 Case 30 Case 31 Case 32 Case 33
Total Upward load from piles 6218.9 Kn 6218.9 6084.1 5392.7 3487.4 5705.9 4877.5 4879.7 3361.0 6210.6 6168.5 6210.6 3990.5 4702.3 4675.8 4702.3 2958.9 5415.0
3 - 1.5 /2 - 1.328
Distance from CL of pile to critical section m -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578 -0.578
STATUS Shear Reinforcement Not Required
10.2.3 Check for Flexure in T-T direction Combination1 Combination2
Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16
Total Upward load from piles 4340.6 Kn 4340.6 4246.3 4340.6 2632.5 3693.0 3487.2 3693.0 2679.3 3313.1 3231.4 2762.8 1960.4 2750.3 2750.3 2750.3 1999.3
Distance from CL of pile to edge of 1.250
pier m 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250
Upward Moment at the face of Pier 5425.8 Knm 5425.8 5307.9 5425.8 3290.7 4616.3 4359.0 4616.3 3349.1 4141.4 4039.2 3453.4 2450.5 3437.8 3437.8 3437.8 2499.2
Self wt of pile cap + soil 50.625 Kn/m^2 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6
Length of Cantilever 7.3 /2 - 3.5 /2 m 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
Downward moment at face of pier 50.625 * 1.9 * 7.3^2/2 Knm 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9 392.9
Net Upward Moment KNm 1170 1143 1170 674 982 922 982 687 872 848 712 479 708 708 708 490
Limiting moment of resistance of M
section
ulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck KNm 9323.5 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1 9407.1
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Effective Width of footing m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Effective depth required 500.264 500.3 494.4 500.3 379.6 458.3 444.1 458.3 383.4 431.7 425.8 390.1 319.9 389.1 389.1 389.1 323.6
Effective Depth provided 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Main Steel at bottom face along L-L axis of footing
R Mu/bd^2 0.585 0.571 0.585 0.337 0.491 0.461 0.491 0.343 0.435 0.424 0.355 0.239 0.354 0.354 0.354 0.245
Area of steel required 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d mm^2 1940.0 1893.7 1940.0 1107.5 1622.7 1522.3 1622.7 1130.1 1437.5 1397.7 1170.5 783.8 1164.4 1164.4 1164.4 802.5
Area of steel required / meter width
Ast required/B mm^2 1940.0 1893.7 1940.0 1107.5 1622.7 1522.3 1622.7 1130.1 1437.5 1397.7 1170.5 783.8 1164.4 1164.4 1164.4 802.5
Min Area of steel required max(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) mm^2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Area of steel to be provided Max(1940.02 , 2060.24) 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Spacing of steel required at bottom20 mm + 0 mm dia bars mm 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
Ast provided at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm @ 100 mm c/c mm^2 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
% of steel provided 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222
Max. area of tension reinforcement 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
Distribution Steel
Min Area of tension reinforcement 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
Ast req at top face along L-L axis
20 % of Ast mm^2 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0
Spacing of steel required at top 12 mm dia bars 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112
Ast provided at top 12 mm bars @ @ 100 mm c/c mm^2 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131
Area of Dist. Steel req on b/face20 % of Ast mm^2 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0
Combinatio
Combination1 (congestion factor as per Combination2 (congestion factor as per n1
Combination3 (considering
IRC:6-2014) IRC:6-2014)
snow load
Wind Load
as Leading
Case 1 : Longitudinal Seismic Case Case 2 : Transverse Seismic Case Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Live Load as Leading Load Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 22 Case 23 Case 24 Case 25 Case 26 Case 27 Case 28 Case 29 Case 30 Case 31 Case 32 Case 33
Total Upward load from piles 1993.6 + 2151.6 + 0 Kn 4128.3 4025.3 3575.5 2409.6 5097.2 4527.2 4539.7 2472.3 4496.9 4426.3 4496.9 2632.5 3448.5 3387.4 3448.5 1960.4 3646.3
Distance from CL of pile to edge of 1.250
pier m 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250 1.250
Upward Moment at the face of Pier Knm 5160.4 5031.6 4469.4 3012.0 6371.5 5659.0 5674.7 3090.4 5621.1 5532.9 5621.1 3290.7 4310.7 4234.2 4310.7 2450.5 4557.9
Self wt of pile cap + soil Kn/m^2 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6 50.6
Length of Cantilever m 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
Downward moment at face of pier Knm 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9 2562.9
Net Upward Moment 604.1 574.1 443.4 104.4 885.7 720.0 723.7 122.7 711.2 690.7 711.2 169.2 406.5 388.7 406.5 -26.1 463.9
Limiting moment of resistance of M
section
ulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck KNm 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5 9323.5
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Effective Width of footing m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Effective depth required (604.05 x 10^6 / (4.68 x 1000) 359.4 350.4 307.9 149.4 435.2 392.4 393.4 162.0 390.0 384.3 390.0 190.2 294.8 288.3 294.8 74.8 315.0
Effective Depth provided 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0 1415.0
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
Main Steel at bottom face along L-L axis of footing
R Mu/bd^2 0.302 0.287 0.221 0.052 0.442 0.360 0.361 0.061 0.355 0.345 0.355 0.085 0.203 0.194 0.203 -0.013 0.232
Area of steel required 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d mm^2 991.6 941.9 725.8 170.0 1460.9 1184.2 1190.3 199.8 1169.6 1135.4 1169.6 275.8 665.0 635.7 665.0 -42.5 759.8
Area of steel required / meter width
Ast required/B mm^2 991.6 941.9 725.8 170.0 1460.9 1184.2 1190.3 199.8 1169.6 1135.4 1169.6 275.8 665.0 635.7 665.0 -42.5 759.8
Min Area of steel required max(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) mm^2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Area of steel to be provided Max(991.56 , 2060.24) 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2 2060.2
Spacing of steel required at bottom20 mm + 0 mm dia bars mm 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152
Ast provided at bottom 20 mm + 0 mm @ 100 mm c/c mm^2 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142 3142
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
% of steel provided 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222 0.222
Max. area of tension reinforcement 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375 35375
O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K O.K
Distribution Steel
Min Area of tension reinforcement1010 mm 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010 1010
Ast req at top face along L-L axis
20 % of Ast mm^2 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0
Spacing of steel required at top 12 mm dia bars 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112 112
Ast provided at top 12 mm bars @ @ 100 mm c/c mm^2 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131 1131
Area of Dist. Steel req on b/face20 % of Ast mm^2 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0 412.0

10.2.4 Check For Shear Combination1 Combination2


Case 1 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 2 : Wind Load as Leading Load Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Wind Load as Leading Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8 Case 9 Case 10 Case 11 Case 12 Case 13 Case 14 Case 15 Case 16
Total Upward load from piles 4340.6 Kn 4340.6 4246.3 4340.6 2632.5 3693.0 3487.2 3693.0 2679.3 3313.1 3231.4 2762.8 1960.4 2750.3 2750.3 2750.3 1999.3
-0.078
Distance from CL of pile to critical section m -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1 -0.1
STATUS Shear Reinforcement Not Required
Combinatio
Combination1 (congestion factor as per Combination2 (congestion factor as per n1
Combination3 IRC:6-2014) IRC:6-2014) (considering
Wind Load
as Leading
Check For Shear Case 1 : Longitudinal Seismic Case Case 2 : Transverse Seismic Case Case 3 : Live Load as Leading Load Case 4 : Live Load as Leading Load Load
Description of Item Calculations for Case 1 Unit Case 17 Case 18 Case 19 Case 20 Case 21 Case 22 Case 23 Case 24 Case 25 Case 26 Case 27 Case 28 Case 29 Case 30 Case 31 Case 32 Case 33
Total Upward load from piles 4128.3 Kn 4128.3 4025.3 3575.5 2409.6 5097.2 4527.2 4539.7 2472.3 4496.9 4426.3 4496.9 2632.5 3448.5 3387.4 3448.5 1960.4 3646.3
-0.078
Distance from CL of pile to critical section m -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078 -0.078
STATUS Shear Reinforcement Not Required
10.2.5 Punching Shear
Critical Case for punching shear check
Vertical Long. Transverse P/A ML / ZL MT / ZT Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure
S.No Load Moment Moment at A at B at C at D
P ML MT PA PB PC PD
(KN) (KNm) (KNm) (KN/m^2)(KN/m^2) (KN/m^2)(KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2) (KN/m^2)
Case - (i) 36988.8 14209 15820.8 316.55 76.8 66.05 459.40 327.3 305.8 173.7
Calculation of Punching Shear
Axial load at base of the pier VED KN 36988.8
Moment at the base of the pier KN-m 21264.7
Average base pressure Pav Kn/m^2 316.6
Effective depth of Footing m 1.40
C1 C2
Size of Pier m 3.5 X 1.5
C1/C2 2.3
K 0.80
Size of Footong at distance 'd' m 4.90 X 2.90
Dist. Critical section for punching shear from the face of pier 0.70
Effective depth of footing at a distance d/s (Critical section) m 1.427
length of Perimeter at critical shear section Ui m 15.59
Area of the critical section Sqm 14.18

Net Upward Pressure at Critical Section Kn/m^2 316.6


Upward Force ΔVED Kn 4489.5
VED Red = VED - ΔVED Kn 32499.2
W 83.9
VED 0.16
Punching Shear resistance
Distance frm column to perphery
a' m 1.40
K 1.37
Vmin 0.295
ρly 0.002
ρlz 0.002
ρl 0.002
ⱱ Rd= 0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^(1/3)*2*d/a>=ⱱmin2*d/a Kn 1.24
V 0.6*[1-(fck/310)] 0.53
ⱱRd .max=1/2*ⱱ*fcd Kn 4.16
STATUS O.K
Punching shear reinforcement not required
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

10.3 Design of Working Pile for ULS Case- For Max axial (Fixed Head Pile)

Youngs Modulus E = (Refer Table ** of IRC:21) = 29580 kn/m^2


Moment of Inertia I = p x 1.0 ^ 4 / 64 = 0.0491 m^4
C/s area A = p x 1.0 ^2 / 4 = 0.7854 m^2

Pile cap Bott GL


Exposed Length L1 = 280.190 - 282.290 = 0.00 m

Equivalent length of cantilever L = L1 + Lf


= 0.00 + 6.82

Equivalent length of cantilever L = 6.82 m (Refer lateral capacity calculation)

Least radius of gyration g min = I/A = 0.25 m


Effective length L = = 6.82 m

slenderness ratio = L / r min


= 6.8 / 0.25 = 27.280
< 50 (Short Column)

Reduction Factor for BM = 0.820 (From Fig 3B for Fixed head pile)

Allowable tilt of pile wrt cl at top = 1 in 150


= 6.82 / 150
e = 0.045467 m

Bending Moment = Q (L1+LF)/2 x R.F + V x e

Ast provided in working piles = 20 nos of 16 mm dia bars = 4021.24 mm^2

Percentage of steel provided = = 0.51 %


> 0.40 %
(Min. % of steel as per Cl.709.4.4 of IRC:78)
Summary of Loads & Moments on the Pile:

Load (V) H.F (Q) Dia of Pile Ast


Load Case Description
(KN) (KN) (m) (mm^2)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 2309.61 69.94 34.97 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 2318.46 86.16 43.08 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 2309.61 69.94 34.97 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1438.29 36.97 18.49 1.0 4021.2
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1854.93 8.30 4.15 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1854.93 8.30 4.15 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1854.93 8.30 4.15 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1402.00 12.30 6.15 1.0 4021.2
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1778.93 60.65 30.32 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1786.60 74.70 37.35 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1778.93 60.65 30.32 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1081.05 32.25 16.12 1.0 4021.2
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1380.83 22.07 11.03 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1380.83 22.07 11.03 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1380.83 22.07 11.03 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1048.77 10.78 5.39 1.0 4021.2
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
2297.52 107.26 53.63 1.0 4021.2
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal
2249.29
Case 107.45 53.73 1.0 4021.2
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse
2021.14
Case 107.23 53.61 1.0 4021.2
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged
1324.20
Case 45.65 22.83 1.0 4021.2
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
2610.94 115.30 57.65 1.0 4021.2
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal
2329.20
Case 114.98 57.49 1.0 4021.2
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse2332.23
Case 104.07 52.03 1.0 4021.2
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged1313.44
Case 91.84 45.92 1.0 4021.2
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 2256.78 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 2229.81 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 2256.78 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1361.04 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1729.83 4.43 2.21 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1709.77 4.43 2.21 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1729.83 4.43 2.21 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1013.75 4.43 2.21 1.0 4021.2
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 1835.85 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

STAAD FILE FOR PILE DESIGN

STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 14-Feb-17
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0 6.82 0 0;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 2;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 2.95e+007
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 25
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
1 PRIS YD 1.0
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
1 FIXED
*****Comb-1, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 34.96 FY -2309.61 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 43.07 FY -2318.45 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 34.96 FY -2309.61 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 18.48 FY -1438.29 FZ 0
*****Comb-1, Case (2)
**************** (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1854.92 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 6 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1854.92 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 7 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1854.92 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 8 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 6.15 FY -1401.99 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 9 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 30.32 FY -1778.93 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 10 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 37.35 FY -1786.6 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 11 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 30.32 FY -1778.93 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 12 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 16.12 FY -1081.05 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (2)
**************** (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 13 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 11.03 FY -1380.83 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 14 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 11.03 FY -1380.83 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 15 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 11.03 FY -1380.83 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 16 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 5.39 FY -1048.76 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Longi. Seismic with Max. Reaction Case
LOAD 17 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 53.63 FY -2297.52 FZ 0
****************(ii) Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
LOAD 18 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 53.72 FY -2249.29 FZ 0
****************(iii) Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
LOAD 19 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 53.61 FY -2021.13 FZ 0
****************(iv) Long. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 20 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 22.82 FY -1324.19 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Trans Seis with Max. Reaction Case
LOAD 21 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 57.64 FY -2610.94 FZ 0
****************(ii) Trans Seis with Max. Longitudinal Case
LOAD 22 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 57.48 FY -2329.2 FZ 0
****************(iii)Trans. Seis with Max. Transverse Case
LOAD 23 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 52.03 FY -2332.23 FZ 0
****************(iv) Trans. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 24 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 45.91 FY -1313.43 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Trans Seis with Max. Reaction Case
LOAD 25 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -2256.77 FZ 0
****************(ii) Trans Seis with Max. Longitudinal Case
LOAD 26 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -2229.81 FZ 0
****************(iii)Trans. Seis with Max. Transverse Case
LOAD 27 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -2256.77 FZ 0
****************(iv) Trans. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 28 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -1361.03 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Trans Seis with Max. Reaction Case
LOAD 29 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.21 FY -1729.82 FZ 0
****************(ii) Trans Seis with Max. Longitudinal Case
LOAD 30 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.21 FY -1709.77 FZ 0
****************(iii)Trans. Seis with Max. Transverse Case
LOAD 31 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.21 FY -1729.82 FZ 0
****************(iv) Trans. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
LOAD 32 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.21 FY -1013.74 FZ 0
****************(iv) Trans. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 33 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -1835.85 FZ 0

PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT ALL


START CONCRETE DESIGN
CODE INDIAN
CLEAR 0.1 MEMB 1
FC 35000 MEMB 1
FYMAIN 500000 MEMB 1
FYSEC 500000 ALL
MAXMAIN 25 ALL
MINMAIN 10 ALL
RATIO 2.5 ALL
TRACK 2 ALL
ULY 1 ALL
ULY 1 ALL
DESIGN COLUMN ALL
END CONCRETE DESIGN
FINISH
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

10.4 Design of Working Pile for ULS Case-Min axial (Fixed Head Pile)

Youngs Modulus E = (Refer Table ** of IRC:21) = 29580399 kn/m^2


Moment of Inertia I = p x 1.0 ^ 4 / 64 = 0.0491 m^4
C/s area A = p x 1.0 ^2 / 4 = 0.7854 m^2

Pile cap Bott GL


Exposed Length L1 = 280.190 - 282.290 = 0.00 m

Equivalent length of cantilever L = 6.82 m (Refer lateral capacity calculation)

Least radius of gyration g min = I/A = 0.25 m


Effective length L = = 6.82 m

slenderness ratio = L / r min


= 6.8 / 0.25 = 27.280
< 50 (Short Column)

Reduction Factor for BM = 0.820 (From Fig 3B for Fixed head pile)

Allowable tilt of pile wrt cl at top = 1 in 150


= 6.82 / 150
e = 0.045467 m

Bending Moment = Q (L1+LF)/2 x R.F + V x e

Ast provided in working piles = 20 nos of 16 mm dia bars = 4021.24 mm^2

Percentage of steel provided = = 0.51 %


> 0.40 %
(Min. % of steel as per Cl.709.4.4 of IRC:78)
Summary of Loads & Moments on the Pile:

Load (V) H.F (Q) Dia of Pile Ast


Load Case Description
(KN) (KN) (m) (mm^2)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1715.09 69.94 34.97 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1646.46 86.16 43.08 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1715.09 69.94 34.97 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1132.51 36.97 18.49 1.0 4021.2
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1735.18 8.30 4.15 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1735.18 8.30 4.15 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1735.18 8.30 4.15 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1174.36 12.30 6.15 1.0 4021.2
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1258.99 60.65 30.32 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1199.52 74.70 37.35 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1258.99 60.65 30.32 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 824.48 32.25 16.12 1.0 4021.2
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1280.26 22.07 11.03 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1280.26 22.07 11.03 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1280.26 22.07 11.03 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 861.40 10.78 5.39 1.0 4021.2
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
1381.65 107.26 53.63 1.0 4021.2
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal
1333.50
Case 107.45 53.73 1.0 4021.2
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse
1107.26
Case 107.23 53.61 1.0 4021.2
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged761.96
Case 45.65 22.83 1.0 4021.2
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
1068.23 115.30 57.65 1.0 4021.2
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal791.23
Case 114.98 57.49 1.0 4021.2
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse 796.17
Case 104.07 52.03 1.0 4021.2
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged 772.72
Case 91.84 45.92 1.0 4021.2
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1867.00 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1849.22 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1867.00 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1209.76 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1393.96 4.43 2.21 1.0 4021.2
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1375.24 4.43 2.21 1.0 4021.2
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1393.96 4.43 2.21 1.0 4021.2
d): One Span Dislodged Case 891.78 4.43 2.21 1.0 4021.2
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load case)
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 1748.69 4.98 2.49 1.0 4021.2
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

STAAD FILE FOR PILE DESIGN

STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 15-Feb-17
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0 6.82 0 0;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 2;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 2.95e+007
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 25
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
1 PRIS YD 1.0
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
1 FIXED
*****Comb-1, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 34.96 FY -1715.08 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 43.07 FY -1646.46 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 34.96 FY -1715.08 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 18.48 FY -1132.5 FZ 0
*****Comb-1, Case (2)
**************** (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1735.18 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 6 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1735.18 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 7 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1735.18 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 8 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 6.15 FY -1174.36 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Max reaction case
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
LOAD 9 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 30.32 FY -1258.99 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 10 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 37.35 FY -1199.51 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 11 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 30.32 FY -1258.99 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 12 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 16.12 FY -824.47 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (2)
**************** (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 13 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 11.03 FY -1280.25 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 14 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 11.03 FY -1280.25 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 15 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 11.03 FY -1280.25 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 16 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 5.39 FY -861.4 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Longi. Seismic with Max. Reaction Case
LOAD 17 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 53.63 FY -1381.65 FZ 0
****************(ii) Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
LOAD 18 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 53.72 FY -1333.49 FZ 0
****************(iii) Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
LOAD 19 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 53.61 FY -1107.25 FZ 0
****************(iv) Long. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 20 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 22.82 FY -761.95 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Trans Seis with Max. Reaction Case
LOAD 21 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 57.64 FY -1068.23 FZ 0
****************(ii) Trans Seis with Max. Longitudinal Case
LOAD 22 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 57.48 FY -791.22 FZ 0
****************(iii)Trans. Seis with Max. Transverse Case
LOAD 23 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17

DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET


TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
2 FX 52.03 FY -796.16 FZ 0
****************(iv) Trans. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 24 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 45.91 FY -772.72 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Trans Seis with Max. Reaction Case
LOAD 25 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -1866.99 FZ 0
****************(ii) Trans Seis with Max. Longitudinal Case
LOAD 26 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -1849.22 FZ 0
****************(iii)Trans. Seis with Max. Transverse Case
LOAD 27 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -1866.99 FZ 0
****************(iv) Trans. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 28 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -1209.76 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Trans Seis with Max. Reaction Case
LOAD 29 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.21 FY -1393.95 FZ 0
****************(ii) Trans Seis with Max. Longitudinal Case
LOAD 30 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.21 FY -1375.24 FZ 0
****************(iii)Trans. Seis with Max. Transverse Case
LOAD 31 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.21 FY -1393.95 FZ 0
****************(iv) Trans. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 32 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.21 FY -891.78 FZ 0
****************(iv) Trans. Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
LOAD 33 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 2.48 FY -1748.69 FZ 0

PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT ALL


START CONCRETE DESIGN
CODE INDIAN
CLEAR 0.1 MEMB 1
FC 35000 MEMB 1
FYMAIN 500000 MEMB 1
FYSEC 500000 ALL
MAXMAIN 25 ALL
MINMAIN 10 ALL
RATIO 2.5 ALL
TRACK 2 ALL
ULY 1 ALL
ULY 1 ALL
DESIGN COLUMN ALL
END CONCRETE DESIGN
FINISH
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
ROB RS GMS

10.5 ULS RESULTS FOR WORKING PILE

C O L U M N N O. 1 DESIGN RESULTS

M35 Fe500 (Main) Fe500 (Sec.)

LENGTH: 6820.0 mm CROSS SECTION: 1000.0 mm dia. COVER: **** mm

** GUIDING LOAD CASE: 21 END JOINT: 1 SHORT COLUMN

DESIGN FORCES (KNS-MET)


-----------------------
DESIGN AXIAL FORCE (Pu) : 2610.94

About Z About Y
INITIAL MOMENTS : 393.10 0.00
MOMENTS DUE TO MINIMUM ECC. : 122.64 122.64

SLENDERNESS RATIOS : - -
MOMENTS DUE TO SLENDERNESS EFFECT : - -
MOMENT REDUCTION FACTORS : - -
ADDITION MOMENTS (Maz and May) : - -

TOTAL DESIGN MOMENTS : 393.10 122.64

REQD. STEEL AREA : 1338.09 Sq.mm.


REQD. CONCRETE AREA: 167260.73 Sq.mm.
MAIN REINFORCEMENT : Provide 12 - 12 dia. (0.17%, 1357.17 Sq.mm.)
(Equally distributed)
TIE REINFORCEMENT : Provide 8 mm dia. circular ties @ 190 mm c/c

SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED (KNS)


------------------------------------------------------
Puz : 12850.73 KNS

SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED (KNS)


------------------------------------------------------
END JOINT: 1 Puz : 12857.58 KNS IR:0.20
END JOINT: 2 Puz : 11431.23 KNS IR:0.16

============================================================================
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

11.A Design of Pier Cap in Transverse Direction as Cantilever for Maximum moment

Size of Pier cap at top = 8.50 x 2.70 m

Effective Size of Pier = 4.56 x 1.50 m

Average height of bearing + pedestal = 0.500 m


Overall depth of abutment cap = 1.60 m = 1600 mm
Straight = 0.80 m = 800 mm at tip
Tapered = 0.80 m = 800 mm at root

Unit weight of concrete = 25.00 KN/m^3

11.A.1 Summary of DL + SIDL + CWLL 2 760.75


Vertical reactions given below are considered from STAAD analysis
Unfactored Loads
Description of Load Vertical Load Long. Trans. Longitudinal Moment
Transverse Moment

LHS RHS Ecc. Ecc. LHS RHS LHS RHS


DL reaction 1800.00 -0.65 0.00 -1170.00 0.00
DL reaction 1400.00 0.65 0.00 910.00 0.00
SIDL reaction 452.78 -0.65 0.00 -294.31 0.00
SIDL reaction 331.22 0.65 0.00 215.29 0.00
FPLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL reaction 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
snow load (with LL) 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
snow load (with LL) 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 1.16 0.00 0.00
CWLL reaction 760.75 0.65 1.16 494.49 878.67
2252.78 2491.97 -1464.31 1619.78 0.00 878.67

factored Loads
Partial
Description of Load Vertical Load Long. Trans. Longitudinal MomentTransverse Moment
Safety
LHS RHS Ecc. Ecc. LHS RHS LHS RHS
factor
DL reaction 2430.00 -0.65 0.00 -1579.50 0.00 1.35
DL reaction 1890.00 0.65 0.00 1228.50 0.00 1.35
SIDL reaction 769.72 -0.65 0.00 -500.32 0.00 1.7
SIDL reaction 563.08 0.65 0.00 366.00 0.00 1.7
FPLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
FPLL reaction 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
snow load (with LL) 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35
snow load (with LL) 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35
CWLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 1.16 0.00 0.00 1.5
CWLL reaction 1141.13 0.65 1.16 741.73 1318.00 1.5
3199.72 3594.20 -2079.82 2336.23 0.00 1318.00

Horizontal force (factored) = 376.02 KN

Critical section for bending from c/l of Pier = 2.280 m

Design properties
Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35 Mpa
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = 35.00 Mpa
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.80 Mpa

Type of combination = Basic & Seismic


Partial material safety factor for concrete (gm) = 1.50
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete (єcu3) = 0.0035 Mpa

Modulus of elasticity of concrete (Ecm) = 32000 Mpa


Modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.25
Steel
Grade of Steel = FE 500
Characteristic strength of steel (fy)or(fyk) = 500.00 Mpa
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement fywd = 348.00 Mpa
Partial material safety factor for Steel (gs) = 1.15
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Mpa
Ultimate tensile strain in the steel (єs) = 0.00417

Design Factors Cube


Coeff. to consider the influence of the conc. strength (a) = 0.67
Factor (l ) = 0.8
Factor (h) = 1
Design value of concrete compressive strength fcd = (a*fck/gm) = 15.633 Mpa
Factor Fav, (hfcdl) = 12.507
Factor b = (l/2) = 0.400
Lever arm z= = 0.9

Design value of steel tensile strength fyd = (fck/gm) = 434.78 Mpa


xu,lim/d = 0.456
Rlim = 0.8095fcd*(xu/d)*(1-0.416*xu/d) = 4.68

For Left Span


No of bearings = 3
c/c distance between bearing = 2.50 m

Distance to outer bearing = 2.50


Distance to inner bearing = 0.00

Section Modulus for Outer bearing = 1 x ( 2.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 2.500 = 2.50 m^3


Section Modulus for Inner bearing = 1 x ( 2.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 0 = m^3

For Right Span


No of bearings = 3
c/c distance between bearing = 2.50 m

Distance to outer bearing = 2.50


Distance to inner bearing = 0.00

Section Modulus for Outer bearing = 1 x ( 2.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 2.500 = 2.50 m^3


Section Modulus for Inner bearing = 1 x ( 2.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 0 = m^3

Left Span Right Span


Reaction due to vertical load 1066.6 1198.1

Reaction on outer bearing due to Transverse Moment = 0.00 527.20 KN


Reaction on inner bearing due to Transverse Moment = KN

Reaction on 1st bearing (Outer) = 1066.6 1725.3 KN


Reaction on 2nd bearing (Inner) = 1066.6 1198.1 KN

Dist. of 1st bearing from Section 1-1 = 0.220 0.22 m


Dist. of 2nd bearing from Section 1-1 = 0.000 0.000 m
11.A.2 Design for Flexure:

BM at the face of abut due to reactions = 2133.15 x 0.220 + 1066.57 x 0.000


3450.53 x 0.220 + 1198.07 x 0.000 = 1226.57 KNm

BM due to self wt = 141.41 + 47.14 = 188.55 KNm

Torsional Moment due to Braking Force = 125.34 x 2.10 = 263.21 KNm


Torsional Moment due to long.moment = 2133.15 x 0.65 - 2923.33 x 0.65 = -513.62 KNm
Total torsional bending moment = 263.21 + 513.62 = 776.83 KNm

Equivalent BM = Me*(1+D/b)/1.7 = 727.75 KNM

Total BM = 1226.57 + 188.55 + 727.75 = 2142.87 KNm

Limiting moment of resistance = Mulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck = 28819.15 KNm


OK

Effective depth required = Sqrt(M/Qb) = ( 2142.87 / 4.68 x 2700 ) ^ 0.5


= 0.412 m

Effective depth available = 1514 mm = 1.514 > 0.412 m O.K

R = Mu/bd^2 = 0.3462

Ast required = 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d = 3292.5 mm^2

Ast minimum = min(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) = 5314.1 mm^2

Provide 20 Nos of 20 mm dia bars in two layers. Ast = 6284 mm^2)


= 6284 mm^2)
11.A.3 Shear check:

11.A.3.1 Shear check at a distance effective depth 'd' (Sec 2-2)

Shear will be checked at a distance 'd' from the face of the pieri.e Sec 2-2 = 1.514 m

Overall depth at a distance 'd' = 0.800 + 0.456 / 1.970 x 0.800 = 0.985 m


Effective depth = 0.985 - 0.086 (Effective cover) = 0.899 m

Total reaction at the Sec 2-2 = 2133.15 + 0.00 = 2133.15 KN


SF due to self wt = = 35.60 KN

Total moment at the critical section = 2133.15 x -1.294 + 1066.57 x 0.00 = -2761.00 KNm

Slope of bottom face tanb = 0.80 / 1.970 = 0.406


M * tanb /d = -2761.00 x 0.406 / 0.899 = -1247.39 KN

Equivalent Shear due to torsion = 1.6 x 776.83 / 2.700 = 460.35 KN

Net Shear = 2133.15 + 35.60 + 460.35 - -1247 = 3876.49 KN

K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2 = 1.47
d

3/2 1/2
νmin = 0.031K fck = 0.33

σcp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd = 0

ρl = Asl ≤ 0.02 = 0.0026


bwd

VRd.c = [0.12K(80ρlfck)0.33 + 0.15σcp]bwd ≥ (νmin + 0.15σcp)bwd = 794755 N


794.8 KN
Shear reinforcement required
VRd - VRd.c = 3081.7 KN

Provide 6L 16 mm dia stirrups at 150 mm c/c

2
Asw = 1206.4 mm
s >min shear reinforcement - OK
= 150 mm
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio
ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00085
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 345.03 mm

z = 0.9d = 809.1 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm = 348.0 MPa
cotθ = 2.50
αcw = 1 For σcp = 0
bw = 2700 mm
ν1 = 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa

Shear resistance by the yielding of shear reinforcement


VRd.s = (Asw/s)*z*fywd*cotθ
= 5661236 N
= 5661.2 KN
Provided Shear reinforcement is OK

VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 7065954 N
= 7065.95 KN
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS

11.B Design of Pier Cap in Transverse Direction as Cantilever for Maximum Reaction Case

Size of Pier cap at top = 8.50 x 2.70 m

Effective Size of Pier = 4.56 x 1.50 m

Average height of bearing + pedestal = 0.500 m


Overall depth of abutment cap = 1.60 m = 1600 mm
Straight = 0.80 m = 800 mm at tip
Tapered = 0.80 m = 800 mm at root

Unit weight of concrete = 25.00 KN/m^3

11.B.1 Summary of DL + SIDL + CWLL 1 880.31


Vertical reactions given below are considered from STAAD analysis
Unfactored Loads
Description of Load Vertical Load Long. Trans. Longitudinal Moment Transverse Moment

LHS RHS Ecc. Ecc. LHS RHS LHS RHS


DL reaction 1800.00 -0.65 0.00 -1170.00 0.00
DL reaction 1400.00 0.65 0.00 910.00 0.00
SIDL reaction 452.78 -0.65 0.00 -294.31 0.00
SIDL reaction 331.22 0.65 0.00 215.29 0.00
FPLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL reaction 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
snow load (with LL) 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
snow load (with LL) 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00
CWLL reaction 439.69 -0.65 1.16 -285.80 507.84
CWLL reaction 440.62 0.65 1.16 286.40 508.92
2692.47 2171.84 -1750.10 1411.70 507.84 508.92

factored Loads
Partial
Description of Load Vertical Load Long. Trans. Longitudinal Moment Transverse Moment
Safety
LHS RHS Ecc. Ecc. LHS RHS LHS RHS factor
DL reaction 2430.00 -0.65 0.00 -1579.50 0.00 1.35
DL reaction 1890.00 0.65 0.00 1228.50 0.00 1.35
SIDL reaction 769.72 -0.65 0.00 -500.32 0.00 1.7
SIDL reaction 563.08 0.65 0.00 366.00 0.00 1.7
FPLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
FPLL reaction 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
snow load (with LL) 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35
snow load (with LL) 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35
CWLL reaction 659.54 -0.65 1.16 -428.70 761.76 1.5
CWLL reaction 660.93 0.65 1.16 429.60 763.37 1.5
3859.26 3114.01 -2508.52 2024.10 761.76 763.37

Longitudinal moment (Factored) = 547.41 Kn-m


Transverse moment (Factored) = 1525.14 Kn-m

Horizontal force (factored) = 278.51 KN

Critical section for bending from c/l of Pier = 2.280 m

Design properties
Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35 Mpa
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = 35.00 Mpa
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.80 Mpa
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Type of combination = Basic & Seismic
Partial material safety factor for concrete (gm) = 1.50
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete (єcu3) = 0.0035 Mpa

Modulus of elasticity of concrete (Ecm) = 32000 Mpa


Modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.25

Steel
Grade of Steel = FE 500
Characteristic strength of steel (fy)or(fyk) = 500.00 Mpa
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement fywd = 348.00 Mpa
Partial material safety factor for Steel (gs) = 1.15
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Mpa
Ultimate tensile strain in the steel (єs) = 0.00417

Design Factors Cube


Coeff. to consider the influence of the conc. strength (a) = 0.67
Factor (l ) = 0.8
Factor (h) = 1
Design value of concrete compressive strength fcd = (a*fck/gm) = 15.633 Mpa
Factor Fav, (hfcdl) = 12.507
Factor b = (l/2) = 0.400
Lever arm z= = 0.9

Design value of steel tensile strength fyd = (fck/gm) = 434.78 Mpa


xu,lim/d = 0.456
Rlim = 0.8095fcd*(xu/d)*(1-0.416*xu/d) = 4.68

For Left Span


No of bearings = 3
c/c distance between bearing = 2.50 m

Distance to outer bearing = 2.50


Distance to inner bearing = 0.00

Section Modulus for Outer bearing = 1 x ( 2.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 2.500 = 2.50 m^3


Section Modulus for Inner bearing = 1 x ( 2.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 0 = m^3

For Right Span


No of bearings = 3
c/c distance between bearing = 2.50 m

Distance to outer bearing = 2.50


Distance to inner bearing = 2.50 Please Check

Section Modulus for Outer bearing = 1 x ( 2.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 2.500 = 2.50 m^3


Section Modulus for Inner bearing = 1 x ( 2.500 ^2 + 0 ^2 ) / 0 = m^3

Left Span Right Span


Reaction due to vertical load 1286.4 1038.0

Reaction on outer bearing due to Transverse Moment = 304.71 305.35 KN


Reaction on inner bearing due to Transverse Moment = KN

Reaction on 1st bearing (Outer) = 1591.1 1343.4 KN


Reaction on 2nd bearing (Inner) = 1286.4 1038.0 KN

Dist. of 1st bearing from Section 1-1 = 0.220 0.22 m


Dist. of 2nd bearing from Section 1-1 = 0.000 0.220 m
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
11.B.2 Design for Flexure:

BM at the face of abut due to reactions = 3182.25 x 0.220 + 1286.42 x 0.000


2686.70 x 0.220 + 1038.00 x 0.220 = 1517.25 KNm

BM due to self wt = 141.41 + 47.14 = 188.55 KNm

Torsional Moment due to Braking Force = 92.84 x 2.10 = 194.95 KNm


Torsional Moment due to long.moment = 2877.54 x 0.65 - 2381.35 x 0.65 = 322.52 KNm
Total torsional bending moment = 194.95 + 322.52 = 517.48 KNm

Equivalent BM = Me*(1+D/b)/1.7 = 484.78 KNM

Total BM = 1517.25 + 188.55 + 484.78 = 2190.58 KNm

Limiting moment of resistance = Mulimit = 0.3568*Xu/d*(1-0.4*Xu/d)*b*d^2*fck = 28819.15 KNm


OK

Effective depth required = Sqrt(M/Qb) = ( 2190.58 / 4.68 x 2700 ) ^ 0.5


= 0.417 m

Effective depth available = 1514 mm = 1.514 > 0.417 m O.K

R = Mu/bd^2 = 0.3540

Ast required = 0.973*(fcd/fyd)*(1-sqrt(1-(2.055*R/fcd)))*b*d = 3366.7 mm^2

Ast minimum = min(0.26*fctm/fyk*bt*d, 0.0013btd) = 5314.1 mm^2

Provide 20 Nos of 20 mm dia bars in two layers. Ast = 6284 mm^2)


= 6284 mm^2)
11.B.3 Shear check:

11.B.3.1 Shear check at a distance effective depth 'd' (Sec 2-2)

Shear will be checked at a distance 'd' from the face of the pieri.e Sec 2-2 = 1.514 m

Overall depth at a distance 'd' = 0.800 + 0.456 / 1.970 x 0.800 = 0.985 m


Effective depth = 0.985 - 0.086 (Effective cover) = 0.899 m

Total reaction at the Sec 2-2 = 3182.25 + 0.00 = 3182.25 KN


SF due to self wt = = 35.60 KN

Total moment at the critical section = 3182.25 x -1.294 + 1286.42 x 0.00 = -4118.89 KNm

Slope of bottom face tanb = 0.80 / 1.970 = 0.406


M * tanb /d = -4118.89 x 0.406 / 0.899 = -1860.87 KN

Equivalent Shear due to torsion = 1.6 x 517.48 / 2.700 = 306.65 KN

Net Shear = 3182.25 + 35.60 + 306.65 - -1860.9 = 5385.37 KN

K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2 = 1.47
d

νmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.33

σcp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd = 0

ρl = Asl ≤ 0.02 = 0.0026


bwd
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
VRd.c = [0.12K(80ρlfck)0.33 + 0.15σcp]bwd ≥ (νmin + 0.15σcp)bwd = 794755 N
794.8 KN
Shear reinforcement required
VRd - VRd.c = 4590.61943 KN

Provide 6L 16 mm dia stirrups at 150 mm c/c

2
Asw = 1206.37158 mm
s >min shear reinforcement - OK
= 150 mm
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio
ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00085192
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 345.025773 mm

z = 0.9d = 809.1 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm = 348 MPa
cotθ = 2.5
αcw = 1 For σcp = 0
bw = 2700 mm
ν1 = 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa

Shear resistance by the yielding of shear reinforcement


VRd.s = (Asw/s)*z*fywd*cotθ
= 5661236.42 N
= 5661.23642 KN
Provided Shear reinforcement is OK

VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 7065954 N
= 7065.95 KN

11.B.3.2 Shear check below outer bearing (Sec 3-3)

Shear at outer bearing = 1591.12 = 1591.12 KN

Over all depth available at Sec 3-3 = 0.800 + 1.750 / 1.970 x 0.800 = 1.51 m
Effective depth = 1.510 - 0.082 (Effective cover) = 1.428 m

K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2 = 1.37
d

νmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.30

σcp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd = 0

ρl = Asl ≤ 0.02 = 0.0016


bwd

VRd.c = [0.12K(80ρlfck)0.33 + 0.15σcp]bwd ≥ (νmin + 0.15σcp)bwd = 1049315 N


1049.315 KN
Shear reinforcement required
VRd - VRd.c = 541.81033 KN

Provide 6L 12 mm dia stirrups at 150 mm c/c

2
Asw = 678.584013 mm
s >min shear reinforcement - OK
= 150 mm
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio
ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00085192
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 345.025773 mm

z = 0.9d = 1285.2 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm = 348 MPa
cotθ = 2.5
αcw = 1 For σcp = 0
bw = 2700 mm
ν1 = 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa

Shear resistance by the yielding of shear reinforcement


VRd.s = (Asw/s)*z*fywd*cotθ
= 5058273.81 N
= 5058.27381 KN
Provided Shear reinforcement is OK

VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 11223784.6 N
= 11223.78 KN

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy