Pier - RP1 PDF
Pier - RP1 PDF
Pier - RP1 PDF
7.0 Combination for Verification of ultimate limit state as per Table 3.2 of IRC: 6-2014 20
8.0 Combination for Verification of Serviceability Limit State as per Table 3.3 of IRC 6: 2014 26
9.0 Combination for Calculation of Base pressures as per Table 3.4 of IRC : 6 -2014 38
10.0 Combination for calculation of Base pressure for Design of Foundation as per Table 3.4 52
11.0 Design of Pier Cap in Transverse Direction as Cantilever for Maximum Reaction Case 72
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
1.2.4 Pilecap
L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Footing = 4.30 7.30 m
Volume of Rectangular portion of cap on one side= 8.500 x 2.700 x 0.800 = 18.360 m^3
Total Volume of earth above footing = 4.300 x 7.300 x 2.100 = 65.919 m^3
Net Volume of earth above footing = 65.919 -47.085 0.000 -4.210 = 14.624 m^3
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Page # 5
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
The train of loads are placed in such a way that CG of the load system is at the center line of pier to get the max reaction.
1000.00
0.666 0.704
490.00 510.00
170.00 170.00
2.658 2.490
R3 R1 R2 R4
26.040 18.700
0.650 0.650
R3 R1 R2 R4
26.040 18.700
0.650 0.650
For Class A 2 Lane the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 2 times that of Class A 1 Lane.
R1 = 2 x 217 = 434.00 KN
R3 = 2 x 109 = 218.00 KN
R2 = 2 x 216.04 = 432.08 KN
R4 = 2 x 65.96 = 131.92 KN
For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 2.7 times that of 1L Class A.
(As per clause 208 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)
Braking Force for LHS = (0.2 * 272 + 0.05 * 544) * 0.9 + 0.1 * 54 = 78.84 KN
Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 282 + 0.05 * 564) * 0.9 + 0.1 * 0 = 76.14 KN
For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 0.9 times that of (70RW + 1L Class A)
(As per clause 208 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)
Braking Force for LHS = (0.2 * 490 + 0.05 * 490) * 0.9 + 0.1 * 54 = 115.65 KN
Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 510 + 0.05 * 510) * 0.9 + 0.1 * 0 = 114.75 KN
Longitud
Vertical Reaction Vertical Load on spans Braking Force Reaction
Details of .
(KN) Reaction (KN) (KN) at free
Load Cases Moment
LHS Span RHS Span (KN) LHS Span RHS Span LHS Span RHS Span end (KN)
KNm
70 RW 439.69 440.62 880.31 0.61 490.00 510.00 98.00 102.00 69.38
1 LCA 217.00 216.04 433.04 -0.62 326.00 282.00 59.80 56.40 65.96
2 LCA 434.00 432.08 866.08 -1.25 652.00 564.00 59.80 56.40 131.92
4 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
70RW+1 CLA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
To find the maximum longitudinal moment, the train of loads are placed in such a way that the starting load is placed at the
center line of the pier.
1000.00
5.124 14.226
R1 R2 R4
18.700
0.650 0.650
5.714 13.636
R1 R2 R4
18.700
0.650 0.650
For Class A 2 Lane the loads & the moments shall get multiplied by 2 times that of Class A 1 Lane.
R2 = 2 x 364.6 = 729.20 KN
R4 = 2 x 135.4 = 270.80 KN
For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 2.7 times that of 1L Class A.
(As per clause 208 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
R2 = 2.7 x 364.6 = 984.42 KN
R4 = 2.7 x 135.4 = 365.58 KN
Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 500 + 0.05 * 1000) * 0.9 = 135.00 KN
For 3 lane loading the loads & the moments shall be multiplied by 0.9 times that of (70RW + 1L Class A)
(As per clause 208 of IRC:6, for 3 lane loading the longitudinal effects shall be reduced by 10%)
Braking Force for RHS = (0.2 * 1000 + 0.05 * 1000) * 0.9 = 225.00 KN
Longitud
Vertical Reaction Vertical Load on spans Braking Force Reaction
Details of .
(KN) Reaction (KN) (KN) at free
Load Cases Moment
LHS Span RHS Span (KN) LHS Span RHS Span LHS Span RHS Span end (KN)
KNm
70 RW 0.00 760.75 760.75 494.49 1000.00 200.00 239.25
1 LCA 0.00 364.60 364.60 236.99 500.00 100.00 135.40
2 LCA 0.00 729.20 729.20 473.98 1000.00 100.00 270.80
3 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
70RW+1 CLA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Longitud
Vertical Reaction Vertical Load on spans Braking Force Reaction
Details of .
(KN) Reaction (KN) (KN) at free
Load Cases Moment
LHS Span RHS Span (KN) LHS Span RHS Span LHS Span RHS Span end (KN)
(KNm)
70 RW 0.00 239.25 239.25 155.51 1000.00 200.00 760.75
1 LCA 0.00 135.40 135.40 88.01 500.00 100.00 364.60
2 LCA 0.00 270.80 270.80 176.02 1000.00 100.00 729.20
3 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
70RW+1 CLA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge
Crash Barrier 3.750 Crash
with Safety Kerb
8.500
0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 70RW
1.155 2.595
8.500
0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 1 LCA
2.450 1.300
8.500
0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 2 LCA
0.700 3.050
8.500
0.500 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 2 LCA
0.000 -1.050 4.800
8.500
3.3.5 70 RW + 70RW:
cg of 70RW CG of 2 70RW
0.500 4.895 0.500
CL of Bridge CG of 2 LCA
-1.145 2.450 1.300
8.500
Left Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 26.04 m Right Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.70 m
H.F at Fixed bearing for POT/PTFE bearing = Fh - m (Rg + Rq) or Fh / 2 + m (Rg + Rq)
Vertical
Longitudin Load on spans Braking Force Reaction Centrifug Trasverse Trasverse Horizontal Force(KN)
Details of Load Reactio
al Moment (KN) (KN) at free al Force Ecc. Moment Span
Cases n Service Seismic
(KNm) LHS-Span RHS-Span LHS-Span RHS-Span end (KN) (KN) (KN) (KNm) Dislodged
(KN)
Max Reaction Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 880.31 0.61 490.00 510.00 98.00 102.00 69.38 88.58 1.155 1016.76 185.67 54.15 112.64
Case 2 : 1 LCA 433.04 -0.62 326.00 282.00 59.80 56.40 65.96 53.86 2.450 1060.95 151.65 49.65 112.64
Case 3 : 2 LCA 866.08 -1.25 652.00 564.00 59.80 56.40 131.92 107.72 0.700 606.26 162.45 51.41 112.64
Case 4 : 4 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.050 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.040 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Min Reaction Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 239.25 155.51 0.00 1000.00 0.00 200.00 760.75 88.58 1.155 276.33 224.61 52.89 112.64
Case 2 : 1 LCA 135.40 88.01 0.00 500.00 0.00 100.00 364.60 44.29 2.450 331.73 169.41 49.23 112.64
Case 3 : 2 LCA 270.80 176.02 0.00 1000.00 0.00 100.00 729.20 88.58 0.700 189.56 176.18 48.39 112.64
Case 4 : 4 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.050 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.154 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Max Longitudinal Moment Case
Case 1 : 70 RW 760.75 494.49 0.00 1000.00 0.00 200.00 239.25 88.58 1.155 878.67 250.68 61.23 112.64
Case 2 : 1 LCA 364.60 236.99 0.00 500.00 0.00 100.00 135.40 44.29 2.450 893.27 180.87 52.89 112.64
Case 3 : 2 LCA 729.20 473.98 0.00 1000.00 0.00 100.00 270.80 88.58 0.700 510.44 199.10 55.73 112.64
Case 4 : 4 LCA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1.050 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
Case 5 : 70RW + 1 CLA
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.020 0.00 112.64 45.06 112.64
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
4.4 Summary of vertical effect due to bracking force
Appilcation
of load (m)
span (m)
effective
(KN) Service
Details of Load Cases
Span
Span
RHS
LHS
Normal Seismic
As per IRC: 6-2014, no calculation of seismic force is required for structures up to 10m and for structures in Zone -II & Zone -III, if the
two conditions stated below are satisfied simultaneously.
Zone = II
Span Length = 27.34 > 15
Total Length = 449.82 > 60
As per clause 222.3, Since the bridge is not in the Zone-IV or Zone -V, no vertical component of the seismic force is
required to be considered in the design. (Refer clause 222.3 of IRC:6)
AV = 0 x Ah
Horizontal seismic force Feq = Ah x (D.L + b x L.L) (Refer Cl. 222.5 of IRC:6-2000)
Tables as per IRC:6, for Zone Factor, Importance Factor and Foundation Strata:
Fxe
F x e / (E x I)
F x (e + l) / (E x I)
Foundation strata = MS
Grade of Concrete = = M 35
Youngs Modulus E = 5700 x (35) ^ 0.5 / 1000 = 3.250E+07 KN/m^2
Min DL & LL has been considered for calculating fundamental time period on conservative side as the same coefficient is used for all max
load, min load and max longitudinal moment cases.
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
T = = 0.4928 sec
T = = 0.223 sec
T = = 0.3249 sec
T = = 0.325 sec
5.1 Wind Force on exposed area of the superstructure (Normal to the wind dir) (Refer clause 212.2 & 212.3)
Exposed area of superstructure = ( Area of Deck with C/Barrier for Left Span + Area of Deck with C/Barrier for Right Span)
A1 = ((27.34 x (2.065 + 0.065 + 1) 42.79 m^2
A2 ((20 x (2.065 + 0.065 + 1) 31.30 m^2
Wind load on live load = No Live Load is considered (Refer clause 209.3.7 of IRC:6- 2010)
= 0 x 3 x 92.189 x 1.95 x 1.2/1000 = 0.000 KN
5.2.1.1 Wind Force on exposed area of the superstructure (Normal to the wind dir)
7.0.1Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Pier shaft Base
7 Seismic Forces
7a Long. seismic with Max. Live load 218.71 292.53 0.00 2832.72 0.00
7b Long. seismic with Min. Live Load -217.915 292.53 0.00 2832.72 0.00
7c Long. seismic with One Span Dislodged -137.591 205.97 0.00 1830.73 0.00
7d Trans. seismic with Max. Live load 218.714 0.00 327.42 0.00 3609.89
7e Trans. seismic with Min. Live Load -217.915 0.00 326.22 0.00 3592.00
7f Trans. seismic with One Span Dislodged -137.591 0.00 205.97 0.00 1979.59
8 Snow Loads
Snow load Reaction: Left span (No
8a Live Load) 0.00 -0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
Snow load Reaction: Right span (No
Live Load) 0.00 0.650 0.000 0.00 0.00
COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*0.75+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 7137.746 205.690 0.000 2042.400 762.569
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*0.75+(6*)+(5*1) 7048.076 254.447 0.000 2977.204 659.000
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*0.75+(6*)+(5*1) 7137.746 205.690 0.000 2042.400 762.569
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.75+(4Q*)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*+(5*1) 4224.734 84.480 0.000 2103.192 0.000
COMBINATION 3
Vertical Longi. Trans
Long. H.F Trans.
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case Load Moment moment
(Kn) H.F (Kn)
(Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(5*1)+(7a*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0. 6751.997 458.491 147.337 4138.088 1827.804
3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(5*1)+(7b*1.25*1.5) 6531.602 459.907 146.799 4253.256 1792.133
7.2 Analysis of Rectangular Sections under Axial Load and Bi-Axial Bending moments
Grade of Concrete M 35
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for Axial Compression 8.75 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for bending Compression 11.67 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Compression 205 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Tension 240 N/mm
2
Area of Concrete 5.2500 m
2
Area of Steel =2×3.14/4×(0.032^2×10+0.032^2×30)×1e6 64340 mm OK
Percentage of Steel 1.23 %
2
Min. Area of steel on each face= 0.0012*Ac 6300.0 mm OK
2
Total Area of vertical reinforcement = 0.0024*Ac 12600 mm
2
= 0.04*Ac 210000 mm Steel Prov > Min reqd
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
8.0 Combination for Verification of Serviceability Limit State as per Table 3.3 of IRC 6: 2014
8.0.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Pier shaft
Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
2c Snow load Reaction: left span (with 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
2d Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 0.00 11.576 11.576 2149.22 0.00
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 0.00 250.68 0.00 11.576 11.576 2901.75 0.00
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 0.00 185.67 0.00 11.576 11.576 2149.22 0.00
4k i Centrifugal force 88.58 0.00 11.576 11.576 1025.39 0.00
4l Span Dislodged 112.64 0.00 11.576 11.576 1303.86 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 11.576 11.576 626.81 0.00
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 0.00 11.576 11.576 708.77 0.00
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 11.576 11.576 626.81 0.00
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 0.00 11.576 11.576 1303.86 0.00
4Q Thermal Loads
For Normal case
From Left Span 48.60 11.576 11.576 562.57 0.00
From Right Span -48.60 11.576 11.576 -562.57 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
COMBINATION 1 (RARE COMBINATION) (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1+(6*0.6)+(4Q 7572.656 4.830 19.319 -237.084 1478.703
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.3+4j*0)*1+(4Q 7483.182 4.830 19.319 362.095 1375.360
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.3+4k*0)*1+(4Q*0*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5 7572.656 4.830 19.319 -237.084 1478.703
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g 4241.428 4.830 19.319 1183.567 233.094
COMBINATION 2 (FREQUENT COMBINATION) (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Live Load as Leading Load Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*0+4b*0+4i*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6* 7300.262 4.025 16.099 -257.710 1128.452
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*0+4d*0+4j*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6*0.5)+(5*1 7233.156 4.025 16.099 191.674 1050.945
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*0+4f*0+4k*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6 7300.262 4.025 16.099 -257.710 1128.452
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*0+4h*0+4l*0)*0.75+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.5+(5*1) 4238.645 4.025 16.099 1173.85 194.245
8.1 Combination for Verification of Serviceability Limit State as per Table 3.3 of IRC 6: 2014
8.1.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base
Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item
P HL HT eL eT ML MT
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
2c Snow load Reaction: left span (with 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
2d Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 88.58 13.076 13.076 2427.73 1158.26
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 0.00 250.68 88.58 13.076 13.076 3277.77 1158.26
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 0.00 185.67 88.58 13.076 13.076 2427.73 1158.26
4l Span Dislodged 0.00 0.00 13.076 13.076 0.00 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 88.58 13.076 13.076 708.04 1158.26
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 88.58 13.076 13.076 800.61 1158.26
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 88.58 13.076 13.076 708.04 1158.26
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 0.00 13.076 13.076 1472.82 0.00
4Q Thermal Loads
For Normal case
From Left Span 48.60 13.076 13.076 635.47 0.00
From Right Span -48.60 13.076 13.076 -635.47 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
COMBINATION 1 (RARE COMBINATION) (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1+(6*0.6)+(4Q*0 9042.255 4.830 19.319 -233.622 1492.549
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*1+(4Q*0*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5*1 8952.781 4.830 19.319 365.556 1389.206
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*1+(4Q*0*0.6)+(6*0.6)+(5*1 9042.255 4.830 19.319 -233.622 1492.549
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*1+(4Q*0*0.6)+(6a+6b+6c+6 5711.027 4.830 19.319 1187.029 246.940
COMBINATION 2 (FREQUENT COMBINATION) (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Trans. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) H.F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5) 8769.861 4.025 16.099 -254.825 1139.990
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6*0.5)+( 8702.755 4.025 16.099 194.558 1062.483
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5) 8769.861 4.025 16.099 -254.825 1139.990
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h*0+4l*0)*0.75+(4Q*0*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.5+(5*1) 5708.245 4.025 16.099 1176.74 205.783
8.3 Analysis of Rectangular Sections under Axial Load and Bi-Axial Bending moments
ML
T
end spacing
LT MT x Longitudinal
y Transverse
L
LL
Grade of Concrete M 35
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for Axial Compression 8.75 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for bending Compression 16.80 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Compression 400 N/mm
2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Tension 400 N/mm
2
Area of Concrete 5.2500 m
2
Area of Steel =2×3.14/4×(0.032^2×10+0.032^2×30)×1e6 64340 mm
Percentage of Steel 1.23 %
2
Min. Area of steel on each face=0.0012*Ac 6300.0 mm OK
2
Total Area of vertical reinforcement = 0.0024*Ac 12600 mm
2
= 0.04*Ac 210000 mm Steel Prov > Min reqd
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Project: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
ly Bars in
Y direction
Bars in X direction
lx
= 1.50 m
= 3.50 m
No of bars in X direction = 30
Diameter of bars in X direction = 0.032 m
Area =3.14×0.032^2/4×30 = 0.02413 m2
No of bars in Y direction = 10
Diameter of bars in Y direction = 0.032 m
Area =3.14×0.032^2/4×10 = 0.00804 m2
Grade of Concrete = 35
gm = 1.5
Interaction
S . No P My Mx a Mux Muy ratio
Long. Trans.
KN KN m KN m KN m KN m
1 10090 4391 1867 1.000 10668 47884 0.27
2 9911 6260 1660 1.000 10577 47643 0.29
3 10090 4391 1867 1.000 10668 47884 0.27
4 4250 3167 342 1.000 7317 39913 0.13
5 8786 -315 570 1.000 9950 46142 0.05
6 8786 -315 570 1.000 9950 46142 0.05
7 8786 -315 570 1.000 9950 46142 0.05
8 4266 1268 570 1.000 7324 39939 0.11
9 7138 2042 763 1.000 9020 43920 0.13
10 7048 2977 659 1.000 8965 43793 0.14
11 7138 2042 763 1.000 9020 43920 0.13
12 4225 2103 0 1.000 7302 39879 0.05
13 6752 4138 1828 1.000 8794 43396 0.30
14 6532 4253 1792 1.000 8668 43087 0.31
15 6556 4138 1820 1.000 8679 43123 0.31
16 4163 4132 891 1.000 7262 39792 0.23
17 10387 -307 2211 1.000 10830 48276 0.20
18 6752 1164 5618 1.000 8794 43396 0.67
19 6532 1279 5564 1.000 8668 43087 0.67
20 6556 1164 5591 1.000 8679 43123 0.67
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
No. of Piles = 6
Area of Footing A = 4.300 x 7.300 = 31.39 m^2
Section Modulus along L-L Axis ZL = 7.300 x 4.300 ^2/6 = 22.50 m^3
Section Modulus along T-T Axis ZT = 4.300 x 7.300 ^2/6 = 38.19 m^3
9.0 Combination for Calculation of Base pressures as per Table 3.4 of IRC : 6 -2014
9.0.1 Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base
Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item HL HT eL eT ML MT
P
(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
2c Snow load Reaction: left span (with 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
2d Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 0.00 13.076 13.076 2427.73 0.00
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 0.00 250.68 0.00 13.076 13.076 3277.77 0.00
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 0.00 185.67 0.00 13.076 13.076 2427.73 0.00
4k i Centrifugal force 88.58 0.00 13.076 13.076 1158.26 0.00
4l Span Dislodged 112.64 0.00 13.076 13.076 1472.82 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 54.15 13.076 13.076 708.04 708.04
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 61.23 13.076 13.076 800.61 800.61
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 54.15 13.076 13.076 708.04 708.04
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 112.64 13.076 13.076 1472.82 1472.82
COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 282.302 32.198 3350.474 1428.324
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8735.685 347.312 32.198 4694.395 1290.232
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 282.302 32.198 3350.474 1428.324
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1+(4Q*1)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*1+(5*1) 5722.156 169.289 32.198 3336.479 411.566
COMBINATION 2
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 282.302 32.198 3350.474 1428.324
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8735.685 347.312 32.198 4694.395 1290.232
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8855.245 282.302 32.198 3350.474 1428.324
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1+(4Q*1)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*1+(5*1) 5722.156 169.289 32.198 3336.479 411.566
COMBINATION 3
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10a*(r1+ 8188.789 312.223 98.225 4654.370 1433.657
r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10b*1.25 7881.348 313.639 97.866 4771.661 1400.132
*1)
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10b*(r1+r 8057.800 312.223 97.866 4654.370 1427.750
2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*0+(5*1)+( 5673.695 149.815 48.933 2807.439 343.283
10c*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*0.5)
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10d*(r1+ 8188.789 107.449 327.416 1239.011 4304.370
r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10e*(r1+r 7881.348 108.865 326.220 1356.303 4257.062
2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(7*0)+(5*1)+(10e*(r1+r 8057.800 107.449 326.220 1239.011 4284.681
2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1)
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(7a+7b+7c+7d)*0+(5*1)+( 5673.695 77.724 102.987 2058.547 1144.278
10f*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*0.5)
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
COMBINATION 1 (CONSIDERING CONGESTION FACTOR AS PER IRC : 6- 2014 CLAUSE 204.4)
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Vertical Longi. Trans
Load Long. H.F Tran. H. F Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a*1.15+4b*1.28+4i*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 9053.384 8.049 32.198 -192.466 1657.175
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c*1.15+4d*1.28+4j*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 8963.910 8.049 32.198 406.712 1553.832
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e*1.15+4f*1.28+4k*0)*1+(7*1)+(5*1) 9053.384 8.049 32.198 -192.466 1657.175
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g*1.15+4h*1.28+4l*0)*1+(4Q*0*1)+(7a+7b+7c+7d) 5722.156 8.049 32.198 1228.185 411.566
No of Piles A = 6
Section Modulus ZLL =( 3 x 3.00 ^2 + 0 x 3.00 ^2 ) 2
= 54.00 m^3
Section ModulusZTT = 2 x 3.00 ^2 + 2 x 0.00 ^ 2) =
2 = 36.00 m^3
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Load Case Pile-1 Pile-2 Pile-3 Pile-4 Pile-5 Pile-6 Total Load
(Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1449.92 1615.48 1687.97 1263.78 1382.81 1475.87 8875.82
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1478.83 1651.55 1693.87 1218.03 1325.55 1455.95 8823.77
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1449.92 1615.48 1687.97 1263.78 1382.81 1475.87 8875.82
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1012.08 1092.71 1080.67 826.72 861.01 953.69 5826.88
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1449.92 1568.94 1687.97 1263.78 1382.81 1501.83 8855.24
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1478.83 1586.35 1693.87 1218.03 1325.55 1433.07 8735.68
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1449.92 1568.94 1687.97 1263.78 1382.81 1501.83 8855.24
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1012.08 1046.37 1080.67 826.72 861.01 895.31 5722.16
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction
1374.61
Case 1494.09 1613.56 1116.04 1235.51 1354.98 8188.79
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal
1329.43
Case 1446.10 1562.78 1064.33 1181.01 1297.69 7881.35
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse
1353.28
Case 1472.25 1591.23 1094.70 1213.68 1332.66 8057.80
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged
994.99
Case 1023.60 1052.21 839.02 867.63 896.24 5673.70
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction1040.52
Case 1399.22 1757.91 971.68 1313.17 1689.08 8171.58
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal
996.48
Case 1351.23 1705.99 921.13 1257.05 1630.64 7862.51
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse
1020.33
Case 1377.38 1734.44 951.49 1291.34 1665.61 8040.59
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged
907.44
Case 1002.80 1098.15 793.08 859.84 983.79 5645.10
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Combination 1 ( Considering
congestion factor as per IRC:6-
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1365.45 1503.55 1641.65 1376.15 1514.24 1652.34 9053.38
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1375.80 1505.28 1634.77 1353.20 1482.69 1612.17 8963.91
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1365.45 1503.55 1641.65 1376.15 1514.24 1652.34 9053.38
d): One Span Dislodged Case 953.51 987.81 1022.11 885.28 919.58 953.87 5722.16
Combination 2 ( Considering
congestion factor as per IRC:6-
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1365.45 1503.55 1641.65 1376.15 1514.24 1652.34 9053.38
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 1375.80 1505.28 1634.77 1353.20 1482.69 1612.17 8963.91
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 1365.45 1503.55 1641.65 1376.15 1514.24 1652.34 9053.38
d): One Span Dislodged Case 953.51 987.81 1022.11 885.28 919.58 953.87 5722.16
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 1435.02 1469.32 1503.61 1448.14 1482.43 1516.73 8855.24
Maximum Vertical Reaction Normal Case = 1693.87 < 3000.00 Hence O.K
Maximum Vertical Reaction Seismic Case = 1757.91 < 3750.00 Hence O.K
Minimum Vertical Reaction Normal Case = 826.72 > 0.00 Hence O.K
Minimum Vertical Reaction Seismic Case = 793.08 > 0.00 Hence O.K
Longitudinal direction
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 0.65
PROJECT:
81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17 1
4
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER
TITLE:
FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB RS GMS
Transverse direction
9.1 Design of Pile Cap for SLS Case
L-L Dir. T-T Dir.
Size of Pier = 1.50 x 3.50 m 3.00
Size of Section for flexure / Sec 1-1 = 1.50 x 3.50 m
Size of pile cap 4.30 x 7.30 m Overall width of cap
Clear Cover to reinforcement = 75 mm
2
Depth of Footing (D) = 1500.0 mm 5 7.30 m
Width of the meber (b) = 4300.00 mm C/L of pile cap
No of Piles = 6 No.s
Section Modulus
ZLL = 54.00 m^3 3.00
Section Modulus
ZTT = 36.00 m^3
3
XL XT P/n ML/ZT * XL MT/ZL * XT Total load 6
Load on Pile 1 1.50 -3.00 1474.02 89.63 -134.56 1429.09 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 2 1.50 0.00 1474.02 89.63 0 1563.65 2.25 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.65
Load on Pile 3 1.50 3.00 1474.02 89.63 134.56 1698.21 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 4 -1.50 -3.00 1474.02 -89.63 -134.56 1249.83 2.25 9.00
Load on Pile 5 -1.50 0.00 1474.02 -89.63 0 1384.39 2.25 0.00
0.00 0.00
Load on Pile 6 -1.50 3.00 1474.02 -89.63 134.56 1518.95 2.25 9.00
13.50 36.00 8844.12
Load due to P = P/n
Load due to ML = ML/ZT * XL 0.65 3.00 0.65
Load due to MT = MT/ZL * XT
Total Load = (P / n) + (ML/ZT * XL) + (MT/ZL * XT)
4.30 m
Load Case Pile-1 Pile-2 Pile-3 Pile-4 Pile-5 Pile-6
(Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn) (Kn)
Combination 1 - Rare Combination C/L of pile cap
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1429.09 1563.65 1698.20 1249.84 1384.39 1518.95
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1472.84 1599.72 1726.60 1181.59 1308.47 1435.35
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1429.09 1563.65 1698.20 1249.84 1384.39 1518.95
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1003.47 1017.18 1030.90 872.77 886.49 900.21
Case - (ii)Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1296.45 1319.32 1342.18 1316.13 1338.99 1361.86
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1296.45 1319.32 1342.18 1316.13 1338.99 1361.86
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1296.45 1319.32 1342.18 1316.13 1338.99 1361.86
d): One Span Dislodged Case 997.89 1020.75 1043.62 863.77 886.63 909.50
Case - (ii)Thermal Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1390.04 1503.53 1617.02 1261.37 1374.86 1488.35
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1422.84 1530.58 1638.32 1210.18 1317.92 1425.66
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1390.04 1503.53 1617.02 1261.37 1374.86 1488.35
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1006.77 1029.63 1052.49 854.89 877.76 900.62
Combination 2 - Frequent Combination
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1398.72 1500.78 1602.84 1270.91 1372.97 1475.03
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1431.53 1527.83 1624.14 1219.73 1316.03 1412.33
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1398.72 1500.78 1602.84 1270.91 1372.97 1475.03
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1002.21 1013.64 1025.08 877.67 889.10 900.54
Case - (ii)Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1315.27 1328.99 1342.71 1311.90 1325.62 1339.33
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1315.27 1328.99 1342.71 1311.90 1325.62 1339.33
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1315.27 1328.99 1342.71 1311.90 1325.62 1339.33
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1000.82 1014.54 1028.26 875.42 889.14 902.86
Case - (ii)Thermal Load as Leading Load
Longitudinal direction
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 0.65
PROJECT:
81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17 1
4
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER
TITLE:
FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB RS GMS
Transverse direction
a): Maximum Reaction Case 1328.84 1364.44 1400.03 1312.33 1347.93 1383.53
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
1337.58 1371.65 1405.71 1298.68 1332.74 1366.81
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
1328.84 1364.44 1400.03 1312.33 1347.93 1383.53
d): One Span Dislodged Case 1004.86 1016.29 1027.72 875.02 886.46 897.89
Combination 3 - Quasi - Permanent Combination
Case - (i)
a): Normal Case 1324.52 1324.52 1324.52 1324.52 1324.52 1324.52
a): One Span Dislodged Case 949.06 949.06 949.06 949.06 949.06 949.06
9.2
Note: Pile length considered is 13.6m and liner length to be provided is 8m and thickness of liner to
be considered as 8mm
Youngs Modulus E = = 29580 kn/m^2
Moment of Inertia I = p x 1.0 ^ 4 / 64 = 0.049 m^4
C/s area A = p x 1.0 ^2 / 4 = 0.785 m^2
T = 3.10 m
Reinforcement ring
Compression
NA
Execute
D M
X
P
Tension
Cover
Results
Design condition = Un cracked sectionPCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS
Diameter of the Section [D] mm = 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Axial Load on Column [P] kN = 1698.2 1726.6 1698.2 1030.9 1361.9 1361.9 1361.9 1043.6 1617.0 1638.3 1617.0 1052.5 1602.8 1624.1 1602.8 1025.1 1342.7 1342.7 1342.7 1028.3
Percentage steel [pt] % = 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512
Concrete direct compression [scc] Mpa = 2.069 2.103181 2.068589 1.25575 1.65889 1.65889 1.65889 1.271239 1.9697 1.995644 1.9697 1.282051 1.952428 1.978372 1.952428 1.248653 1.635559 1.635559 1.635559 1.252525
Concrete bending compression [scbc] Mpa = 1.603 1.905598 1.602601 0.590781 0.74512 0.74512 0.74512 0.629679 1.37037 1.594513 1.37037 0.704586 1.348611 1.575738 1.348611 0.564978 0.744639 0.744639 0.744639 0.573258
Compressive stress in steel [ssc] Mpa = 32.97 35.69617 32.97059 17.00721 22.18906 22.18906 22.18906 17.46583 30.16941 32.18915 30.16941 18.16188 29.82815 31.87139 29.82815 16.73425 21.9557 21.9557 21.9557 16.83753
Tensile stress in steel , [ sst] Mpa = 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Depth of neutral axis NA mm = 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stress level in material [scc] = ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[scbc] = ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[ssc] = ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[ sst] = ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Design of section For Piles
Design data Time : 7:48:15 PM
Dimensions of section Case-21 Case-22 Case-23 Case-24 Case-25 Case-26 Case - 27 Case - 28 Case - 29 Case - 30 Case - 31 Case - 32 Case - 33 Case - 34 Case - 35
Diameter of section [D] mm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Design forces
Axial force [P] kN 1400.03 1405.71 1400.03 1027.72 1324.52 949.06 1599.70 1584.54 1599.70 1015.02 1535.59 1517.59 1535.59 60.46 1361.86
Resultant BM [M] kNm 84.26 103.47 84.26 60.64 60.23 43.16 82.02 81.33 82.02 55.43 77.56 76.74 77.56 10.49 71.20
Modular ratio [m] # 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56 6.56
Permissible stress
Concrete direct compression [scc] Mpa 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2
Concrete bending compression [scbc] Mpa 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2
Steel direct compression [ssc] Mpa 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
Steel bending tension [sst] Mpa 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
Reinforcements
Percentage steel assumed [pt] % 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.512 0.512 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179
Clear cover to main reinf. 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Y Data Check ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
Reinforcement ring
Compression
NA
Execute
D M
X
P
Tension
Cover
Results
Design condition PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS PCS
Diameter of the Section [D] mm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Axial Load on Column [P] kN 1400.0 1405.7 1400.0 1027.7 1324.5 949.1 1599.7 1584.5 1599.7 1015.0 1535.6 1517.6 1535.6 60.5 1361.9
Percentage steel [pt] % 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179 0.512000179
Concrete direct compression [scc] Mpa 1.705392 1.71231 1.705392 1.251878 1.613406 1.156051 1.948601205 1.930139013 1.948601205 1.236398383 1.870517812 1.848590184 1.870517812 0 1.658889987
Concrete bending compression [scbc] Mpa 0.811265 0.996222 0.811265 0.583849 0.579902 0.41555 0.789698412 0.783055009 0.789698412 0.533686698 0.746756996 0.738861938 0.746756996 0.177820516 0.685522152
Compressive stress in steel [ssc] Mpa 23.16734 24.69139 23.16734 16.91454 20.4409 14.64675 25.39074176 25.15677692 25.39074176 16.36734177 24.28436634 24.00644858 24.28436634 1.542170582 21.71990786
Tensile stress in steel , [ sst] Mpa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0.07899721 0
Depth of neutral axis NA mm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 842.023469 0
Stress level in material [scc] ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[scbc] ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[ssc] ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
[ sst] ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok ok
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Combination for calculation of Base pressure for Design of Foundation as per Table 3.4
10.0.1
Vertical Load and their moments about C/L of Foundation Base
Volume Unit Wt. Vertical Horizont. Horizont. Long. Trans. Long. Trans.
Load Force Force Eccentri. Eccentri. Moment Moment
S.No Item HL HT eL eT ML MT
P
3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (kN) (kN) (m) (m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
1 Loads from Super structure
1a DL Reaction : Left span 1800.00 -0.65 -1170.00
1b DL Reaction : Right span 1400.00 0.65 910.00
2a SIDL Reaction : Left span 452.78 -0.65 0.000 -294.31 0.00
2b SIDL Reaction : Right span 331.22 0.65 0.000 215.29 0.00
3984.00 -339.01 0.00
2c Snow load Reaction: left span (with 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
2d Snow load Reaction: Rightspan(with 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Footpath Loads
3a FPLL Reaction : Left span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
3b FPLL Reaction : Right span 0.00 0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 Carriageway Live Loads
Maximum Reaction case
4a CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4b CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
Maximum Longitudinal Momemt
4c CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 1.155 0.00 0.00
4d CWLL Reaction : Right Span 760.75 0.65 1.155 494.49 878.67
Maximum transverse moment
4e CWLL Reaction : Left Span 439.69 -0.65 1.155 -285.80 507.84
4f CWLL Reaction : Right Span 440.62 0.65 1.155 286.40 508.92
One Span Dislodged Case
4g CWLL Reaction : Left Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
4h CWLL Reaction : Right Span 0.00 -0.65 0.000 0.00 0.00
HF at Bearing Level
4i Maximum Reaction case 0.00 185.67 0.00 13.076 13.076 2427.73 0.00
4j Maximum Longitudinal Moment 0.00 250.68 0.00 13.076 13.076 3277.77 0.00
4k Maximum Transverse Moment 0.00 185.67 0.00 13.076 13.076 2427.73 0.00
4k i Centrifugal force 88.58 0.00 13.076 13.076 1158.26 0.00
4l Span Dislodged 112.64 0.00 13.076 13.076 1472.82 0.00
4m Seismic case with Maximum Reaction Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 13.076 13.076 708.04 0.00
4n Maximum Longitudinal Case 0.00 61.23 0.00 13.076 13.076 800.61 0.00
4o Maximum Transverse Case 0.00 54.15 0.00 13.076 13.076 708.04 0.00
4p One Span Dislodged Case 112.64 0.00 13.076 13.076 1472.82 0.00
COMBINATION 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS
Longi. Trans
Vertical Long. H. Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load Load (Kn) F (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 12074.1 418.624 28.978 5014.828 1895.546
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 11894.8 516.139 28.978 7030.710 1688.409
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.5+(6*0.9)+(5*1.35) 12074.1 418.624 28.978 5014.828 1895.546
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1.35+(2c+)*1.75+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1.5+(4Q*0.9)+(6a+6b+6c+6d) 7712.4 219.945 28.978 4392.908 370.409
*0.9+(5*1.35)
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 10770.3 12.074 48.297 -303.330 617.349
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 10770.3 12.074 48.297 -303.330 617.349
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.15+(6*1.5)+(5*1) 10770.3 12.074 48.297 -303.330 617.349
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4g+4h+4l)*1.5+(4Q*0.9)+(6* 7729.1 55.814 48.297 2245.406 617.349
0.9)+(5*1)
COMBINATION 2
Longi. Trans
Vertical Long. H. Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load Load (Kn) F (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1.3+(6*0.8)+(5*1) 9113.8 362.968 25.76 4405.87 1651.04
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1.3+(6*0.8)+(5*1) 8958.3 447.481 25.76 6152.97 1471.52
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1.3+(6*0.8)+(5*1) 9113.8 362.968 25.76 4405.87 1651.04
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1.3+(4Q*0.8)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.8+(5*1) 5716.6 191.752 25.76 3630.65 329.25
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4i)*1+(6*1.3)+(5*1) 7983.3 125.622 41.857 -205.254 535.036
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4j)*1+(6*1.3)+(5*1) 7983.3 125.622 41.857 -205.254 535.036
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1+(2c+2d)*1+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4k)*1+(6*1.3)+(5*1) 7983.3 125.622 41.857 -205.254 535.036
d): One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1+(2c+)*1+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*1.3+(4Q*0.8)+(6a+6b+6c+6d)*0.8+(5*1) 5730.5 49.344 41.857 1767.428 535.036
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Roadway pier 14/02/17
TITLE: DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
COMBINATION 3
Longi. Trans
Vertical Long. H. Tran. H. Moment moment
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case Load (Kn) F (Kn) F (Kn) (Knm) (Knm)
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1. 11037.5 612.071 198.905 8401.532 2694.720
35)+(7a*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1.3 10748.4 613.487 198.179 8518.823 2655.141
5)+(7b*1.25*1.5)
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1.3 9385.2 612.071 198.179 8401.532 2682.759
5)+(7b*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1.35+(2c+)*1.75+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d) 6258.5 255.377 99.089 4297.884 1940.833
*0+(5*1.35)+(7c*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*0.75)
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4a+4b+4m)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1. 11037.5 197.403 663.017 2245.004 8507.914
35)+(7d*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4c+4d+4n)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1.3 9361.3 198.819 660.596 2362.296 8440.425
5)+(7e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case
(1a+1b+2a+2b)*1.35+(2c+2d)*1.75+(3a+3b+4e+4f+4n)*0.2+(6*0)+(5*1.3 9385.2 197.403 592.383 2245.004 8468.043
5)+(7e*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*1.5)
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case
(1a+2a+)*1.35+(2c+)*1.75+(3a+4g+4h+4l)*0.2+(4Q*0.5)+(6a+6b+6c+6d) 6258.5 109.393 540.057 2781.377 2317.162
*0+(5*1.35)+(7f*0.5*(r1+r2*0.3+r3*0.3)*1.25*0.75)
Long. Transvers
Vertical Long. H. F Tran. H. F Moment e Moment Total HF HF per
Load Load Case Description Load P (KN) (KN) 'ML' 'ML' (KN) Pile (KN)
Case No (KN) (KNm) (KNm)
Combination 1
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 12074 419 29 5015 1896 419.63 69.94
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 11895 516 29 7031 1688 516.95 86.16
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 12074 419 29 5015 1896 419.63 69.94
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7712 220 29 4393 370 221.85 36.97
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 10770 12 48 -303 617 49.78 8.30
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 10770 12 48 -303 617 49.78 8.30
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 10770 12 48 -303 617 49.78 8.30
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7729 56 48 2245 617 73.81 12.30
Combination 2
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9114 363 26 4406 1651 363.88 60.65
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 8958 447 26 6153 1472 448.22 74.70
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9114 363 26 4406 1651 363.88 60.65
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5717 192 26 3631 329 193.47 32.25
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 7983 126 42 -205 535 132.41 22.07
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 7983 126 42 -205 535 132.41 22.07
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 7983 126 42 -205 535 132.41 22.07
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5731 49 42 1767 535 64.71 10.78
Combination 3
Case - (i) Longitudinal Seismic Case
a): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 11038 612 199 8402 2695 643.58 107.26
b): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 10748 613 198 8519 2655 644.70 107.45
c): Longitudinal Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 9385 612 198 8402 2683 643.36 107.23
d): Longitudinal Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 6258 255 99 4298 1941 273.93 45.65
Case - (ii) Transverse Seismic Case
a): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Reaction Case 11038 197 663 2245 8508 691.78 115.30
b): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Longitudinal Case 9361 199 661 2362 8440 689.87 114.98
c): Transverse Seismic with Maximum Transverse Case 9385 197 592 2245 8468 624.41 104.07
d): Transverse Seismic with One Span Dislodged Case 6258 109 540 2781 2317 551.02 91.84
Combination 1 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 12371 7 29 -300 2239 29.87 4.98
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 12237 7 29 599 2084 29.87 4.98
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 12371 7 29 -300 2239 29.87 4.98
d): One Span Dislodged Case 7712 7 29 1612 370 29.87 4.98
Combination 2 ( Considering congestion factor as per IRC:6-2014)
Case - (i) Live Load as Leading Load
a): Maximum Reaction Case 9371 6 26 -200 1949 26.55 4.43
b): Maximum Longitudinal Moment Case 9255 6 26 579 1814 26.55 4.43
c): Maximum Transverse Moment Case 9371 6 26 -200 1949 26.55 4.43
d): One Span Dislodged Case 5717 6 26 1208 329 26.55 4.43
COMBINATION 1 (considering snow load with no Live load
Case - (ii) Wind Load as Leading Load 10754 7 29 -458 370 29.87 4.98
No of Piles A = 6 m^2
Section ModulusZLL =( 3 x 1.50 ^2 + 2 x 0.00 ^2 ) x 2 =
54.00 m^3
Section ModulusZTT = 2 x 3.00 ^2x 2 = 36.00 m^3
Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = M35 Mpa (Table no:6.5, IRC:112-2011)
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.80 MPa
10.3 Design of Working Pile for ULS Case- For Max axial (Fixed Head Pile)
Reduction Factor for BM = 0.820 (From Fig 3B for Fixed head pile)
STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 14-Feb-17
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0 6.82 0 0;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 2;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 2.95e+007
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 25
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
1 PRIS YD 1.0
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
1 FIXED
*****Comb-1, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 34.96 FY -2309.61 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 43.07 FY -2318.45 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 34.96 FY -2309.61 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 18.48 FY -1438.29 FZ 0
*****Comb-1, Case (2)
**************** (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1854.92 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 6 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1854.92 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 7 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1854.92 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 8 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 6.15 FY -1401.99 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 9 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 30.32 FY -1778.93 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 10 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 37.35 FY -1786.6 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 11 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 30.32 FY -1778.93 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 12 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 16.12 FY -1081.05 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (2)
**************** (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 13 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
10.4 Design of Working Pile for ULS Case-Min axial (Fixed Head Pile)
Reduction Factor for BM = 0.820 (From Fig 3B for Fixed head pile)
STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 15-Feb-17
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER KN
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0 6.82 0 0;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 2;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 2.95e+007
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 25
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
1 PRIS YD 1.0
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
1 FIXED
*****Comb-1, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 34.96 FY -1715.08 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 43.07 FY -1646.46 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 34.96 FY -1715.08 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 18.48 FY -1132.5 FZ 0
*****Comb-1, Case (2)
**************** (i) Max reaction case
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1735.18 FZ 0
****************(ii) Max Longitudinal moment case
LOAD 6 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1735.18 FZ 0
****************(iii) Max Transverse moment case
LOAD 7 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 4.14 FY -1735.18 FZ 0
****************(iv) Max One Span Dislodged case
LOAD 8 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE LOAD CASE 1
JOINT LOAD
2 FX 6.15 FY -1174.36 FZ 0
*****Comb-2, Case (1)
******- LL as leading load- (i) Max reaction case
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
C O L U M N N O. 1 DESIGN RESULTS
About Z About Y
INITIAL MOMENTS : 393.10 0.00
MOMENTS DUE TO MINIMUM ECC. : 122.64 122.64
SLENDERNESS RATIOS : - -
MOMENTS DUE TO SLENDERNESS EFFECT : - -
MOMENT REDUCTION FACTORS : - -
ADDITION MOMENTS (Maz and May) : - -
============================================================================
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
11.A Design of Pier Cap in Transverse Direction as Cantilever for Maximum moment
factored Loads
Partial
Description of Load Vertical Load Long. Trans. Longitudinal MomentTransverse Moment
Safety
LHS RHS Ecc. Ecc. LHS RHS LHS RHS
factor
DL reaction 2430.00 -0.65 0.00 -1579.50 0.00 1.35
DL reaction 1890.00 0.65 0.00 1228.50 0.00 1.35
SIDL reaction 769.72 -0.65 0.00 -500.32 0.00 1.7
SIDL reaction 563.08 0.65 0.00 366.00 0.00 1.7
FPLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
FPLL reaction 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
snow load (with LL) 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35
snow load (with LL) 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35
CWLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 1.16 0.00 0.00 1.5
CWLL reaction 1141.13 0.65 1.16 741.73 1318.00 1.5
3199.72 3594.20 -2079.82 2336.23 0.00 1318.00
Design properties
Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35 Mpa
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = 35.00 Mpa
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.80 Mpa
R = Mu/bd^2 = 0.3462
Shear will be checked at a distance 'd' from the face of the pieri.e Sec 2-2 = 1.514 m
Total moment at the critical section = 2133.15 x -1.294 + 1066.57 x 0.00 = -2761.00 KNm
K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2 = 1.47
d
3/2 1/2
νmin = 0.031K fck = 0.33
2
Asw = 1206.4 mm
s >min shear reinforcement - OK
= 150 mm
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio
ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00085
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 345.03 mm
z = 0.9d = 809.1 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm = 348.0 MPa
cotθ = 2.50
αcw = 1 For σcp = 0
bw = 2700 mm
ν1 = 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa
VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 7065954 N
= 7065.95 KN
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
11.B Design of Pier Cap in Transverse Direction as Cantilever for Maximum Reaction Case
factored Loads
Partial
Description of Load Vertical Load Long. Trans. Longitudinal Moment Transverse Moment
Safety
LHS RHS Ecc. Ecc. LHS RHS LHS RHS factor
DL reaction 2430.00 -0.65 0.00 -1579.50 0.00 1.35
DL reaction 1890.00 0.65 0.00 1228.50 0.00 1.35
SIDL reaction 769.72 -0.65 0.00 -500.32 0.00 1.7
SIDL reaction 563.08 0.65 0.00 366.00 0.00 1.7
FPLL reaction 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
FPLL reaction 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15
snow load (with LL) 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35
snow load (with LL) 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35
CWLL reaction 659.54 -0.65 1.16 -428.70 761.76 1.5
CWLL reaction 660.93 0.65 1.16 429.60 763.37 1.5
3859.26 3114.01 -2508.52 2024.10 761.76 763.37
Design properties
Concrete
Grade of Concrete = M 35 Mpa
Charactristic strength of concrete (fck) = 35.00 Mpa
Tensile strength of concrete (fctm) = 2.80 Mpa
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Type of combination = Basic & Seismic
Partial material safety factor for concrete (gm) = 1.50
Ultimate compressive strain in the concrete (єcu3) = 0.0035 Mpa
Steel
Grade of Steel = FE 500
Characteristic strength of steel (fy)or(fyk) = 500.00 Mpa
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement fywd = 348.00 Mpa
Partial material safety factor for Steel (gs) = 1.15
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Mpa
Ultimate tensile strain in the steel (єs) = 0.00417
R = Mu/bd^2 = 0.3540
Shear will be checked at a distance 'd' from the face of the pieri.e Sec 2-2 = 1.514 m
Total moment at the critical section = 3182.25 x -1.294 + 1286.42 x 0.00 = -4118.89 KNm
K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2 = 1.47
d
2
Asw = 1206.37158 mm
s >min shear reinforcement - OK
= 150 mm
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio
ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00085192
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 345.025773 mm
z = 0.9d = 809.1 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm = 348 MPa
cotθ = 2.5
αcw = 1 For σcp = 0
bw = 2700 mm
ν1 = 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa
VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 7065954 N
= 7065.95 KN
Over all depth available at Sec 3-3 = 0.800 + 1.750 / 1.970 x 0.800 = 1.51 m
Effective depth = 1.510 - 0.082 (Effective cover) = 1.428 m
K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2 = 1.37
d
2
Asw = 678.584013 mm
s >min shear reinforcement - OK
= 150 mm
DOCUMENT NO. DATE
PROJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF ROB AT LC NO 81,FALNA ,RAJASTHAN
Roadway pier 14/02/17
DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET
TITLE: DESIGN OF PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION FOR RP1 FOR ROB
RS GMS
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio
ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00085192
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 345.025773 mm
z = 0.9d = 1285.2 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm = 348 MPa
cotθ = 2.5
αcw = 1 For σcp = 0
bw = 2700 mm
ν1 = 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa
VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 11223784.6 N
= 11223.78 KN